TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

RIAA Hammers Google With DMCA Takedowns In Six Strikes Prelude

Very soon the six strikes anti-piracy program will kick off in the United States but the RIAA isn’t just sitting back and presuming that it will be an anti-piracy cure-all. Since early November the recording industry group has massively upped the number of DMCA notices it issues to make content harder to find. From an average of between 200,000 and 240,000 URL requests sent every week to Google, the RIAA has just posted 463,000 and 666,000 in successive weeks.

The well-publicized six-strikes anti-piracy scheme is just around the corner.

The MPAA, RIAA and several large Internet service providers in the United States will work together to monitor file-sharers and send them warnings in the hope that they will start spending small fortunes on CDs, DVDs and digital downloads.

While the monitoring and warning-sending while be fairly widespread, there are limitations as to who can be reached. There is a distinct possibility that once they receive a warning, file-sharers will either take steps to hide their online identities through the use of anonymity technologies like VPNs, or will shift to cyberlocker type services that cannot be monitored.

So, to make things as difficult as possible for both sets of users, rightsholders have been sending ever-increasing volumes of DMCA takedown notices, not just to torrent, cyberlocker and other linking sites, but also to Google. They hope that when Internet users can’t find what they want through a Google search they will grow increasingly tired of looking and turn to official outlets instead.

Google has been receiving huge numbers of these takedowns. To date, anti-piracy company Degban has sent the most – a staggering 8.2 million in total. Microsoft has sent 5.5 million followed by Froytal who deal with the porn industry. Listed twice (once as copyright holders and once as reporting organizations) bed-fellows the BPI and RIAA have also been sending huge numbers of takedowns, but this month have broken all records.

To give an idea of the scale, back in June this year the RIAA was sending takedown requests to Google at the rate of around 100,000 per week, with the BPI sending around 70,000. At the end of the July the BPI suddenly started sending around 150,000, with the RIAA reaching a steady 200,000 per week.

BPIGoogle

As can be seen from the diagram above, early September the BPI boosted their volumes significantly, to around 244,000 takedowns a week, increasing to between 300,000 and 330,000 in the weeks that followed.

The RIAA maintained 200,000 to 230,000 steadily until the first week of November and then, pretty much out of nowhere, they massively turned up the heat.

In the week commencing November 5, the RIAA sent 463,000 URL takedown requests to Google, doubling their busiest week ever. Then the following week (last week), the recording industry group sent a mind-boggling 666,000 takedown requests to Google in just 7 days.

RIAAGoogle

So who are they targeting with all these takedowns? Of course, the usual suspects are all there including the major torrent sites, but perhaps what is most surprising is that the most-targeted sites aren’t the ones the RIAA chooses to report to the USTR in its ‘notorious markets‘ review.

In the “non-P2P linking sites” section of the review, only the FileTube.com search engine is given a mention by the RIAA. However, although it is heavily targeted by rightsholders (and RIAA members individually), the site doesn’t appear in the RIAA’s top five most-targeted domains on Google.

The most DMCA’d sites are Downloads.nl (396,094), MP3s.pl (275,035), MP3Searchy.com (253,942), WebLagu.com (225,471) and Audiko.net (189,224).

Will the RIAA break one million URL takedowns a week by the end of the year? There’s only six weeks left to find out.

Related Posts

Previous Post | Next Post

  • Rapist No 1

    I’ve been pirating so long this doesn’t even affect me. I can switch at the drop of a hat to torrents, newsgroups, or DDL and get whatever I want whenever I want VPN or no. This won’t affect hardcore pirates. At all.

    • http://torrentfreak.com/ Rob8urcakes

      Aye and it aint gonna stop me either – but what I’d like to know is how much each of these DMCA’s cost and what effect that’ll have on the artists’ income the MAFIAA purport to represent and serve.

      One things for sure – sending out millions of DMCA takedowns merely highlights just how stupid these so-called industries are as they try to defeat the inevitable march of progress into the 21st Century.

      At least many of the independent groups and artists are now distributing their music themselves via BitTorrent, YouTube, etc.

      • EricPost

        But what’s the point of paying for VPNs and such. You might as well just buy it if you’re going to shell out the cash for services

        • Lulz

          Vpn, $20 a month. Content that’s not available in your area/market/affordability? Priceless.

          Most of the things I download are not available to me otherwise.

        • Eric Dope

          VPNs are also FREE.
          I guess your too lazy (or stupid) to implement these options.

        • Gee

          That’s a retarded comment. I pay $10 a month and get access to unlimited DRM free movies, tv-shows. NO WINDOWED RELEASE. Get it when I want, on MY terms. and best of all no fucking region-locks, which the TV industry seems to love.

        • Anon

          It’s the principle of the thing. Not one cent to copyrightist scum

        • EricPost

          YOU AGAIN! Corporate paid troll!

          I was doing your job before but I never use the name “EricPost” What other names you also going to use?

          Also you voted for yourself only once? I think that you could do better than that. I use to sometime vote dozen of time for myself.

        • Danny

          Eric it is a service issue. That is why people will hapily pay for VPNs.

          If the MAFIAA offered us a service where people could download as much music and film as they like, they will happily pay.

          Just look at the success of netflix and spotify.

          I myself have a netflix subscription, I see it a bit like the old DVD rental shops but far easier! It would be better if I could watch films on my PC but I have to go through a few hoops to do this and my PS3 is more convenient anyway as its hooked to the TV.

        • JordanKratz

          No way is MAFIAA ever seeing a dime out of my Wallet.You want to cave in and do that be my guest but as far as I am Concerned:
          MAFIAA Is Censored in my home !!!
          FOR LIFE…….

        • DRuNKeN MaSTeR

          @Gee: “I pay $10 a month and get access to unlimited DRM free movies, tv-shows. NO WINDOWED RELEASE.”

          Could you tell us the name of this wonderful site? I have been looking for one for the last ten years, yet coulnd’t find one.

        • Scary_Devil_Monastery

          @DRuNKeN MaSTeR

          I think he means “10$ a month for the VPN then watch an ad or two on TPB.”

        • I.Am.An.Idiot

          Some of us (me) lived in crap country, where with vpn and without vpn even web browsing has significant speed difference.

          Where there isn’t much of choice of unlimited internet ISP. Either fast internet and tiny 10-30gb monthly limit or unlimited internet where they have multi-million dollar equipments that checks all data that pass through and throttle anything.

          So its no choice if you want to download then vpn is needed.

      • http://www.facebook.com/songwaters.parijat Parijat Mishra

        no one is asking you to buy cds you can download as you do now, using online credit card transfers are not stone age. you can gift albums to your friends and pay for it if you want so much to share. I went on the steve vai site and gifted an album to by friend with 10$- he recieved the link in his inbox, seems more pregressive than your stone age pilfering to me.

    • EnsignN7

      The RIAA stated that they’re goal is not to stop the hardcore pirates. Just those who are not very tech savvy and get caught easily and heard them back into paying. It’s actually a smart move for them for their goals of just increasing the amount of $$$ in their pockets since piracy will never die but at the same time incredibly stupid and selfish since they’re not really doing anything to solve the problem and just forcing many innocent folks to take fire as well as drowning hope for open formats such as Theora, Vorbis, VP8, etc.

      RIAA is scum at the end of the day and it pisses me off to how much they’re holding back over some amazing development.

      • chronoss

        and then us hard core pirates just help offline 50 people
        that arent so teksavy
        haha hehe WAAAAAAAAAAAAA

    • Bananas

      Those mafgiaa papers always reveal great sites i never heard about.

      • IDIOCRACY

        Same for me, just visited some, some are really interesting hehe

    • JordanKratz

      Already on a VPN which does not keep Logs.
      Already purchased my own Modem so I can give Slime Warner the finger.Also called an Attorney to say I want in on the Classic Action Suit against them.
      Already Boycotting all MAFIAA Content been doing that for around 7 – 10 years.
      Already telling as many of my fans and friends to also Boycott all MAFIAA.
      Already spreading the Word against MAFIAA to my fullest effort.

      FUCK YOU MAFIAA !
      Google needs to charge these Assholes top dollar and make them pay for their lies.

    • Kissybratt
      • Kissybratt

        Give your ISP the BOOT! if enough of us do it.. they will turn this sit around Quick.. weird thing about Corporations.. they dont like it when you eff with their money.

  • MadAsASnake

    2 questions:
    - how many of these were false (either wrong material or not copyrighted by the takedown party)?
    - how many additional purchases are made because of it (DVD or download)

    If previous numbers are anything to go by, ~30% and “close to zero”

    • Dondilly

      That was something that struck me when reading the affidavid attached to the mega seizure application. Mega’s abuse address redirected to a google account and the feds were trying to imply massive infringement due to the number of daily dmca notices (a few thousand. The comment was misleading in that it didnt account for the shear size or number of users. The other point was that the notices are raised against scraped google results and known forums. Practically none of the results would have been verified (is the file still hosted at the address and if so is it infringing). It is as if they think google gives them realtime verified results.

      Not only are the notice issuers guilty of using bots, so are many link submitters who regulary repost the same links via auto
      submit tools many of them dont botherverifying their files are still up .

      I have wondered about anti piracy groups flooding the net with fake locker links. It would make life harder for users, linksites and search engines while falsely painting the locker site in a bad light due to volume of dmca notices

      • Violated0

        The Mega raid was little more than a muck raking exorcise which is why the NZ judge now calls on the DoJ/FBI to turn over some real evidence. Either they can to suitable criminal standards or the whole case is going to collapse.

      • Ohyeah

        well fbi has been posting trap links for 6-8(or more) years now, presumably, you connect to to them, you get r(ai)d(e-d)they post of file boards and i have verified this many times

        • Anonymous

          Yebb, had to report such bait links to the hosting company hosting the material, telling them if they do not turn off that machine/server off immiediatly then that IP address will be null routed. And if they still continue to host such on other servers then their entire IP block will be null routed. Usually such servers then “mysterously” disapear.

    • Whatever

      1. All of them ofcourse. The whole DMCA is false.

      2. Minus % depending on how difficult it is to find what someone is looking for. The harder to find, the less time to go out and buy something. It all goes to pizza delivery firms.

  • Guest

    666,000?!?!?!

    THE RIAA IS TEH DEVUL

    • Mainstream

      Congratulations you have won the spot anything related to the devil award.

      • IHaveNoBalls

        Jokekiller

        • Guest

          that was a joke? clearly the internet has killed the art of telling a joke.

    • Naruto999

      IT’S OVER 9000!!!!!!!!!!!!

      • Techanon

        over 9000!?

        No way! That’s impossible!

    • Wallace

      The Number of 1,000 Beasts

    • JordanKratz

      667 MPAA is the Neighbor of the Beast !

  • Dondilly

    I dont think I’ve ever heard of their top targets listed at the end. Thanks to transpancy we should thank the RIAA for the tip.

    But seriously, who the hell uses google to search for a file?
    While most locker sites dont have content search facilities, link sitesand torrent indexes do.

    I dont think ive ever even found a new link or torrent site via google. The most common method is via p2p forums and an old favourite fot finding new sites is via readmes and NFO files attached to torrents or by checking for alternate filenames on an ed2k download as they often have a linksite tagged to the end of the filename.

    If i get really desperate i just go to chilling effect to see what sites are recommended the most.

    • IDIOCRACY

      Wouldn’t it be nice to have a search engine for chilling effects? or is it there already? did I miss something…. hehe

  • Meh

    And not a fuck was given. Ahoy.

    • Techanon

      If a DMCA takedown = a fuck then I would say that 666.000 fucks are given a week by the RIAA.

      • ScrewEwe2

        And millions of I don’t give a fucks.

  • Guest

    Google will be in very serious trouble if they don’t deal with all these increasing DMCA requests in the shortest time that the MAFFIA would want them removed. Only got themselves to blame for not fighting back.

    • ThumbsUpThumbsDown

      Google will be in serious trouble only if and when 50 0r 60% of its user base says, “See ya!”

      Hasn’t happened yet; but, that doesn’t mean it can’t happen or won’t happen.

      Meanwhile, all these expensive, false, time consuming, take down notices add up exponentially for Google and other affected parties to take to the Press, the Courts, and Congress.

      Every day the cries get louder, “See what this corrupt Copyright Law is doing?”

      Every day it gets harder for even the most corrupt politician to sing from Chris Dodd’s Hymmbook.

      • Andrew me

        Give them enough rope….. Google has a good case for requesting a small fee for every takedown request when it is time to update the DMCA and i think if they do get a decent judge they could possibly go now and request a small fee for every takedown, remember they have human eyes look at every link to confirm it is illegal or looks illegal, that is a lot of eyes every week and that is surely going to cost a lot of money, Maybe google being so open about the amount of links i there way of getting the publicity before they take the next step, we can only hope.
        Or what they could do is just close down for a few days, explain that it costs too much to police the Internet and they have no recourse to any fees from those demanding links be taken down.

        But then again it might be in there interests to release a program into the wild that would make all torrenting anonymous, i am sure with the brainpower all of those programmers they could come up with something fast and anonymous.

  • PirateSoldier

    All these anti piracy groups can come up with is empty facts with even less evidence to support the claims that piracy ‘hurts’ sales. Not once have I ever seen anything concrete. They don’t care about artists only profit. So far pirates have won the war and they have lost every battle.

  • Vincent Giannell

    Hopefully our protest against this scheme will be heard.

  • Jon

    It’s like fighting a locusts with mechanized fly swatters… Yes, you surely can kill more, but it is still futile…

    • BuddhaFacePalmed

      Nah, its like trying to get rid of cockroaches by firebombing your house, Sure, you can get rid of them. But you lose the house, and the cockroaches always come back.

      • ScrewEwe2

        When it comes to cockroaches, the only thing living after an all out global thermonuclear war will be cockroaches and MAFIAA cocksuckers.

        • JordanKratz

          You forgot to say MAFIAA DOGCOCK Suckers.

          No cool and intelligent man is going to go near a MAFIAA Mouth.
          I wouldn’t let a MAFIAA Playboy looking Hottie go near my pole.
          I would rather beat my meat than let MAFIAA touch my pole.
          She can suck my dog’s dick and I will film it so I can make a Viral Vid for us “Pirates”.

  • icec0ld

    Google has already proved how willing it is to actually stand up for common sense internet law. That is to say not at all as it bends over and backwards to try and appease copyright abusers.

    Watch as fewer and fewer people care. Most people have moved to index sites to search for links and torrents and the few that haven’t will soon enough be forced into these sites soon enough.

    Keep at it RIAA. Soon enough law will catch up with society and you’ll be outed, disgraced and held accountable for a decade of abuse.

    • EricPost

      I disagree, once you’re slapped with a DMCA notice, even if you win, Google may not re index your site. I got slapped on my site and I replied and they couldn’t do anything so the DMCA worked as should. They said, I infringed, I proved I did not and my web host restored me ASAP.

      However Google honored this false DMCA notice and it took over a year to get back into Google.

      This is the problem, Google will blatantly honor DMCA regardless. If you WIN your case your still blacklisted. Since Google is an effective monopoly on search (note I didn’t say MONOPOLY but rather EFFECTIVE monopoly),your site will suffer.

      • icec0ld

        You’re going to pretend Google is the only search engine?

        Being the market leader in search engines isn’t a monopoly FYI

      • chronoss

        can i have a DMCA notice then ….i dont want to be listed LOL

        • GoAwayGoogle

          Me too. I got a robots.txt file but I don’t trust them. I wonder if we can send in false DMCA notices so we don’t get listed, you know like the MAFIAA does ;-)

        • JordanKratz

          Is there a way so Billions of us can all make it look like we are Hosting Petabytes of Movies and Bad Mainstream Music ?

          I want to know if we can all Edit Robots.txt or whatever it is so we can all make them think we are all the biggest thieves that ever existed.

          That kind of thing would be a fucking ball……………HA HA HA MAFIAA Shit.

    • http://www.facebook.com/romet.loodus Romet Loodus

      soon enough

    • I’m Batman

      Google *did* stand against SOPA, PIPA, CISPA and the like.

      Though, Google was only one among *many* well known sites; they can be lauded for that, at least.

  • Egg

    Suggestion for Google:
    Start a seperate takedown request office.
    Employ 4-6 people investigating each requests legitimacy.
    Charge $30 per request.
    If takedown request is legitimate, then remove the link.
    Queue all requests as they come in.
    Last request might have to wait 15 or so years to get to the top of the pile.

    • BuddhaFacePalmed

      Yeah, and MAFIAA would be like,

      *ahem**gruffy gentleman redneck voice*, “Dem Guugle whatchamacallit are for profiteering off our profiteering. Imma gunna sue dem.”

      • http://profiles.google.com/zerianis10 Christopher Kidwell

        They can try that, Buddha, but numerous courts and legal experts have already said that charging per DMCA notice would be legal under the law.

    • Guest

      i can still type in ted 2012 download in google and see torrent sites listed. dmca aint that useful

    • JordanKratz

      Come on Google !
      Time for you to wake the fuck up and get with the program.

  • AppleFreak

    Just a thought came to mind, what if they start giving out money (or not, just let you feel justice) when you submit a pirate link to them? And they can create a program, or rather a browser plugin, for the user to install that with a click of a button, user can submit the the link to them for takedown?
    So it’s like, catching pirates=money and/or feeling justice (they can make you feel that with some bullshit video and talks)
    But the counter part to this that this can be tricked somehow by us to earn their money
    If this is true, man, we are going to have a bad time! Or are we?

    Another thought: If Google really got messed up badly, can we just create a similar search engine just as powerful, that locates outside of US? Like Sweden or some other country?

    I might sound stupid, but these are just a few thoughts

    • icec0ld

      A system like that is open to abuse. If you’ve ever worked as a mod for any forum with a report function you’d understand that a good 2/3 or even 3/4s of every report that comes in is completely false, a spam bot or lacking even the most basic sentence of the problem.

      “Catch pirates for justice.”

      Sorry but personally I see no justice in combating pirates by aiding a group that wrecks lives, wields legislation like a toddler with an AK and fails to display any amount of competence in solving what is by and by the largest non problem ever.

      • SporadicTrollgasm

        open to abuse, eh?

        you sound pessimistic- how did you even make it this far when the shitstorm is so near…?? god damnit bro, if people bitch- letem, and if they fake reports and give’em to you, warn them that if they do it again, THEY’RE Gone for good straight to the fucking gutter. plain and simple.

        As for Spam bots, eh, just get rid of em…. if you’re the mod, that means youre in charge of making 99% of the decisions… i advise that you DO use them ^_^ as you will fulfill your duties(as a mod).

        and about the idea that APPLEFREAK was presenting-

        he didn’t clearly express it as he wanted to, but i understand the point so LET ME clear it up for you ::^_^::

        >>>>>>>>MAIN REASON 1:
        he sayin that basically if they create a plugin that would prevent users to visit “COPYRIGHTED MATERIALS” and give an incentive to users for posting “Pirate Links”, then it would actually be a perfect opportunity for us hardcore pirates because we can just post some links( old or new, it doesnt matter) and make money off of them! god damn aint he one educated pirate, contrary to the popular stereotypes :-)

        what i mean is:
        1. report pirate links

        2. get approved by these jackasses(they’re going to pay you, im assuming)

        3. ???????????????

        4. Profit!! haha ;p

        >>>>>>MAIN REASON 2:
        plus even if we DO report them to these buffoons and clowns, they’ll never figure out how to shut us DOWN due to our superior knowledge in P2P and groups of backbreaking coders who constantly face the bleeding edge of technology and the strong bond in communities.

        and with that(knowledge is power) in place, these premature kids’ frustration will increase exponentially which in turn will produce MASSIVE wet dreams about these freakazoids tryina catch us in their dream. lolz.

        so the reality is, when these tight holes wake up, they gon have to learn to do more goddamn chores and buy more expensive european silk boxers- these broke bitches..eh(MPAA/RIAA) HAHAHAHHAHAHAHA ^_________________^

        i hope i made your day. teehee

        • SporadicTrollgasm

          i meant premature kids = MPAA/RIAA

        • icec0ld

          “you sound pessimistic- how did you even make it this far when the shitstorm is so near…?? god damnit bro, if people bitch- letem, and if they fake reports and give’em to you, warn them that if they do it again, THEY’RE Gone for good straight to the fucking gutter. plain and simple.

          As for Spam bots, eh, just get rid of em…. if you’re the mod, that means youre in charge of making 99% of the decisions… i advise that you DO use them ^_^ as you will fulfill your duties(as a mod)”

          I’m questioning the usefulness of people who would use such a system. Using every citizen of the net as a whistle blower leads to lots and lots of false reports and only handful of actual actionable ones.

          It’s not a question of getting rid of them. It’s a question of the level of competence in identifying actionable targets. I see few people would be capable of that and putting a reward on the line just compounds the desperation and stupidity.

          Seems odd to say a mod makes 99% of decisions and I should use em. I do actually. My inbox will tell the same story every day regardless of the amount of action taken. Same story but different names on a different day. Go figure.

          “he sayin that basically if they create a plugin that would prevent users to visit “COPYRIGHTED MATERIALS” and give an incentive to users for posting “Pirate Links”, then it would actually be a perfect opportunity for us hardcore pirates because we can just post some links( old or new, it doesnt matter) and make money off of them! god damn aint he one educated pirate, contrary to the popular stereotypes :-)”

          Hahahahaha….

          Oh, I think you were serious. Willingly install a censoring tool and then get paid by this tool to report pirate links. Yeah, totally not exploitable at all. I know the idea of getting paid by the RIAA gets you hard but they aren’t going to pay jack squat to anyone unless it’s worth it. Best forget this pipe dream. RIAA would sue itself for making money off piracy if it were this dumb.

          “plus even if we DO report them to these buffoons and clowns, they’ll never figure out how to shut us DOWN due to our superior knowledge in P2P and groups of backbreaking coders who constantly face the bleeding edge of technology and the strong bond in communities”

          Funny enough, there are only a few sites truly immune to being shutdown and censored. Megaupload and TVShack have shown us just how far the US is willing to go to combat any site it sees as infringing, willing to discard it’s laws and the laws of other countries and even basic human rights.

          Don’t get me wrong. I don’t even care about piracy. It is the largest 1st world none problem ever. If anything studies have proven time and again its beneficial for entertainment industries. It’s just foolish to think that the internet as it is untouchable is all.

          “i hope i made your day. teehee”

          It did when you weren’t wildly ranting.

      • SporadicTrollgasm

        premature kids = MPAA/RIAA

  • Hulky Dory

    Next logical step for Google. Shut down all US operations, shift servers, offices and staff offshore (leaving no US address where the company can be served AT ALL), then simply give the copyright-holding DMCA abusers the finger when they are no longer obliged to comply with US laws. This might work out more cost effective than trying to appease the ever greedier MAFIAA cohorts. Google have tried to play their little game, but with every appeasement they just face greater demands on their time and resources without benefitting in any way.

    • EricPost

      Google does not care. They are so powerful, they don’t have to worry about people moving search providers. It’s easier to not index the sites and provide less content. They still make the same money either way

      • Scary_Devil_Monastery

        They are so powerful…now. Remember how they started? In a garage, with the only stated goal to index all of the internet.

        Now, if Google’s consumers start noticing that Google isn’t complete – that they don’t index enough – then Google just opened the market for anyone else to do to them what they did to Yahoo.

        And trust me, that can go from Google being top dog to Google being “Who?” in less than a month’s time, if they play their cards wrong.

        What makes Google slow on this is that Google, as a corporation, has always been very long on tech and skill…and very short on lawyers.

        • Uhhuh

          google was funded by nsa look it up, just like facebook funded by cia and nsa

    • chronoss

      then ifpi in europe starts it
      ten cria er music canada then your only in what asia?

  • Wallace

    “The most DMCA’d sites are Downloads.nl (396,094), MP3s.pl (275,035), MP3Searchy.com (253,942), WebLagu.com (225,471) and Audiko.net (189,224).”

    I’d never heard of any of these but after looking at them for the first time I can see why they’re DMCAed. They sure do deliver mp3s efficiently … not that we needed another way to do that, but still. As always, thanks for the tip, RIAA.

    • EricPost

      Most of the mp3s are crap. Really if the RIAA wanted to do something, they need to go after What.CD and Waffles, as they are the two that require quality uploads. Then those quality uploads get redistributed on common sites.

      • chronoss

        liar no such thing as waffles cept kind ya eat and what ? cd?
        1st rule of fight club is what?

      • CLL

        Why would they go after the world’s best recipe site? And what’s that CD you are talking about.

        ;)

      • Frust

        No, all the MP3s are that. I don’t want to hear beautiful music with incomplete parts. Bass so weak, instruments lacking of clarity, backbeats ruined, etc. MP3s… How many compositions and albums were ruined by that format? I remember when most rips came with a bitrate of 96kbs and/or 128kbs. And those greedy guys dare to sell MP3s on Itunes, Amazon, etc? Tsk.

    • JordanKratz

      Is the new Gobbity Goop LP there ?
      What about that new Female Singer Hottie McTrash ? She’s so cool.
      I can’t wait to rip off that LP.

  • MyHair

    Man, glad I don’t live in the US right about now. This thing is complete bullshit.

    • Violated0

      Google tends not to stick to national borders where censorship in one country soon goes global.

      • MaskJustAsk

        Simple, time to forget Google.

  • waaminn

    Big Middle Finger Salute to the RIAA lol

    http://www.Gotz-Anon.tk

  • Guest

    In times like this, TPB becomes increasingly important. And the RIAA needs to know that Google is but one search engine. There are hundreds others – some focusing directly on the material they wish to censor.

    And additionally, by removing search results, well, they are limiting the ability of folks to discover new music. Yep.

    AND one thing’s for certain I’m not likely to go on a spending spree. I don’t have time for it.

    • chronoss

      no it becomes more dangerous as idiots are the only ones that use it and gt logged and sued or striked….haha go back now…they love you

  • Anon

    I don’t think the RIAA specifically wants to apprehend and fine you, or ever did. I think they’d rather you just keep your hands off that which does not belong to you.
    Don’t wanna buy it? That’s cool.
    Do without it.

    But wait.
    That would be adult, like the golden rule. And you are pirates here.
    Never mind.

    • Explain please

      sure, but when i get a letter saying i dl’d something when i didn’t? when my router causes me to be sued? yep, thats a good system. also, it seems lending my dvd to a friend to watch is a crime. please, outline what you would consider fair use? if my game cd gets scratched but i have a backup, thats illegal. I have to rebuy the whole thing. Fair? explain please.

    • Fredrika

      > “I think they’d rather you just keep your hands off that which does not belong to you.”

      You seem confused. Pirates do not put their hands on anything that does not belong to them? They use what actually does belong to them to create something of worth.

      > “Don’t wanna buy it? That’s cool. Do without it.”

      On the free market you do not have to do without it? You can buy it from another seller at a much lower price, or you can manufacture it yourself, as the pirates does.

      Do you have a problem with the free market where no entrepreneur have a legislative monopoly over manufacturing, distribution and sales of certain specific goods and services? Are you advocating communism?

      Btw, you again proved you rather huge ignorance the other day when you continued to fail to understand the difference between a good and a service, and instead completely incorrectly and illogically kept calling creative works for digital goods.

      But then i again did you a favour and explained it to you in great detail, and then you became quiet. Does this mean that you have finally learned what every single consumer legislation and economics course in the world could have thought you?

      And you kept hinting that you considered the free market unfair? And then you had a problem understanding which was the only act that compensates an entrepreneur, as in the actual sale.

      But you have learned since then i hope?

      On the other hand, maybe one shouldn’t expect to much from someone who openly applauds fascism and rape of human beings..

    • Anon

      copyrightists confuse mine and thine: when you create, you create your copy, not all copies. It’s well known that copyright monopoly undermines property law.

    • chronoss

      when copyrights are 5-10 years then they can have the precious that long and might actually get sympathy but 75+75 years give me a break you lazy fucktard….

    • Guest

      >I don’t think the RIAA specifically wants to apprehend and fine you, or ever did.

      HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

      Oh, wait. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

      Okay, now I’m done. Seriously, Anon? You gloat all the time about all the kids getting sued and you decide to pull this line of horsecrap? Just when we all think you can’t top yourself as a liar, you outdo yourself. Daddy Pelouzey must be so proud of you, you little industry cumstain.

    • http://nejtillpirater.wordpress.com/ Nejtillpirater

      Correct.

      • BuddhaFacePalmed

        You know, majority of the comments here are all pro piracy. It’s good that once in awhile a voice against piracy comes up. I salute you, sir. For reminding us that the pro-copyright do have good cause against piracy

        ………and it all gets debunked by fredrika, rickfalkvinge and pretty much anyone who can come up with hard facts that piracy promotes creative culture and rewards innovators

        • http://profiles.google.com/zerianis10 Christopher Kidwell

          Agreed on the last paragraph, Buddha. These people just need to realize that they are not the gatekeepers anymore and that most internet ‘piracy’ is equivalent to friends handing each other a CD 20 years ago and move on past the insanity of trying to stop it.

          Most people are doing a ‘try before buy’ that makes these companies lose NO dollars OR they have already paid for the things in question that they ‘pirate’ through things like a cable TV membership, which today includes? MUSIC CHANNELS!

        • http://nejtillpirater.wordpress.com/ Nejtillpirater

          Never seen those “hard facts”. Nothing debunked either.

        • BJonesTF

          You might need your glasses checked then. Most of what you have to say is factually incorrect, or true only after making certain assumptions, or changing contexts.

          Personally, I don’t have a problem with your comments as they are (there’s no profanity, and it looks like you’ve actually put some thought in) I just wish you’d inject a little bit of reality into it, and tone down the spin. You have GOT to be dizzy by now.
          If you need educating, or your misconceptions corrected, I’ll be happy to point you in the direction of a number of experts in the field. I’m sure they’ll be happy to shatter the myths you currently cherish.

        • Guest

          Aw, Nej, don’t worry; I’m sure that in your own little world under Daddy Pelouzey’s desk everything is peaches and cream. Lots and lots of Daddy Pelouzey’s industry cream.

          I suppose when lying to everyone else doesn’t work out you can always lie to yourself, right? That’s what good little industry slaves do, yes they do!

        • Pelham123

          “You know, majority of the comments here are all pro piracy.”

          I’m anti-piracy. But free speech implies the freedom to hear speech.

          Also, people also have the right to do what they want with their property, with any law (such as a copyright restriction) only providing exceptions to that rule. Those exceptions are all up for debate.

          We generally don’t discuss piracy here. We discuss what digital feudalists and information control enablers have misnamed “piracy.”

        • BuddhaFacePalmed

          @Pelham123

          I stand corrected then.

        • Scary_Devil_Monastery

          @Nejtillpirater

          “Never seen those “hard facts”. Nothing debunked either.”

          That’s because you never read the actual scientific studies performed on piracy. filesharing, and market effects.

          We have. In the face of which you now openly admit that the only thing you are reciting on threads such as these are your own personal opinions.

          Now, feel free – once again – to refute. We pirates have been waiting for four years for you to produce EVEN ONE thesis, paper or study which backs your claims against our peer-reviewed scientifically accurate ones.

          And you never have. All you do is launch into a venomous tirade or a few one-liners beginning and ending with the attempt to discredit whoever wrote anything “pro-pirate”.

          Oh, i forgot. You also applaud self-confessed fascists and have expressed similar views yourself. All in the holy name of “copyright”.

    • Scary_Devil_Monastery

      “That would be adult, like the golden rule. And you are pirates here…”

      Curious you should mention the word “adult” right after a sentence even a five-year old would call “rubbish” for good and valid reason.

      None of us are laying hands on anything belonging to anyone else. We are simply copying it. Because, being adult, we realize the law against copying is as valid as laws forbidding people from stringing male and female articles of clothing up to dry on the same line.

      Then again, Baghdad Bob, last time you were around you confessed to being a fascist and railed impotently against burden of proof, general civil rights, and decided to misquote the UN articles of human rights in a straw-grasping attempt at justifying your position.

      I’d say the only one here acting like a child throwing a tantrum is you.

    • Pelham123

      The Golden Rule is “do unto others as you would have them do unto you.”

      I don’t consider it any of my business when other people share material I had a hand in creating, even if such sharing theoretically creates competition for me.

      Because I have no right or place to tell other people what to do, say or experience just because they own something I had a hand in making.

      And THAT is the one and only adult point of view on this subject.

  • Voice of Reason

    Clearly, they’re doing this through a highly automated process. Google needs to take steps to make it a little less easy for them to do this on such a massive scale.

  • Violated0

    Well I have done a quick sum and on 240,000 a week Google would need 358 employees on rotating 8 hour shifts, on 24 hour days, just to put a healthy 5 minutes check rejection/take-down/counter-claim into each request.

    Considering the fact this is only the RIAA, where Google deals with millions of requests weekly in all, then one of the greatest job creation industries in the United States must be in censorship. This only makes me sad when considering the wages and taxes involved then Google’s personal manager must want to throw themselves from the nearest cliff.

    More likely is that Google is not able to put any healthy oversight into the DMCA take-down process leading to censorship galore. Then since even sending notices takes up lots of work hours then I bet this is all mostly done by computers anyway.

    So the machines are already in control and where mistakes are common.

    • http://profiles.google.com/zerianis10 Christopher Kidwell

      Agreed. With all due respect to the RIAA, this massive amount of things makes it impossible for Google to give proper oversight to these things to make sure that the DMCA’s are actually valid.
      Remember: This is JUST the RIAA’s amount of the pie, not the whole pie.

  • Guest

    Well, one good thing is that the flood of DMCA notices is cleaning up the search engines. The results that remain might be of higher quality. Thanks RIAA!

    • Anonymous

      Nope, the results that remain have degraded immensly.

  • SkyBot

    I see skynet is alive and well

  • Foff

    Due to the fact that most links are massively mirrored and stuff is constantly being reposted take down requests are basically late and irrelevant. I have noticed when look for a specific file there is usually no problem but more general searches can produce a lot of take down notices.

    Lately I just go straight to linking sites to look for what I want. The thing is google is going to really weigh themselves down with all these take requests and fast making themselves useless for certain searches. For example, most teens don’t even bother to use google when looking for mp3′s they already know all the sites. If google gets to in bed with the mafiaa they risk forcing people to stop using google and use alternatives. Google could dethrone themselves from being the search king by becoming the censorship king. Fuck the mafiaa to hell and fuck google they will never stop me pirating the fuck out of anything I want!

  • Guest

    I wonder if anyone would ever think… umm since their going crazy to make sure no-one can find any illegal sources… and have proven that no one can be accountable to false DMCA take downs… (by taking down their legal competition)

    Is the anonymous group going to run a campaign to take down all the legal sources as well? :)

    Lack of information just makes the information more desirable… didn’t the industries learn anything from history! Guess not.

    • Who

      this 6 strikes shit has nothing to do with DMAC take downs. but I guess they want every one to think so and be fear full about it.

  • Who

    Ooooooo I am so scared!!!! I am shaking in me booties. LOL like I give a flying FUCK about DMCA take downs in google. I hardly even use it for searching any more.

  • StevO

    The DMCA is targeting Google. Thats who they are targeting.

  • ScrewEwe2

    “From an average of between 200,000 and 240,000 URL requests sent every week to Google, the RIAA has just posted 463,000 and 666,000 in successive weeks.”

    Is any more proof needed that the RIAA is pure evil?

  • Predator

    The RIAA is destroying the Google search engine using the DMCA as a bulldozer. I am amazed to see Google siting idle, doing nothing in despite the billion of dollars they could use to obliterate the entertainment industry.

    Eventually we are going to do it for them using others methods but it will be too late to save their business. I hope they are aware of this.

  • joexxx

    What’s curious is that DMCA doesn’t apply to Google since it does not host any infringing material nor are they an ISP in this case.
    Although there has been a couple of shaky “linking to is abetting” rulings, Google can easily challenge that and keep it stuck in courts for many years.

    • http://profiles.google.com/zerianis10 Christopher Kidwell

      Agreed there.

    • icec0ld

      Google aren’t willing to see how it would play out in court.

      • joexxx

        Did you read my post?
        They don’t have to. They can keep it from playing out for a LONG time.

        • icec0ld

          Google as a corporation is out to make money, not waste it in a pointless (to them) court battle. They’ve chosen the path of least resistance. At this point it is up to the RIAA to make obeying them more unprofitable than fighting it.

          This could play out in number ways but really at this point Google is happy to stand-aside while RIAA has its fun.

  • IsItGameOn

    Perhaps Google are being a little savvy let’s not forget Google is filled with clever people far cleverer than the AA’s. I reckon they are currently at the data gathering stage and when they have enough they will then put their case to the courts. Who knows perhaps they are actually going to be responsible for the demise of the DMCA itself.

    • Violated0

      You do make a good point when I am sure Google can claim future corporation death predicted due to the DMCA “hammer them to death” mega virus.

      Now although it is a logistical nightmare for Google to examine all DMCA take-down requests to sort out the validly they can process a large batch that they can then compare to the whole.

      It seems quite possible that Google does have the power to forever neuter the DMCA when no organization, not even hosting any infringing content, should have to put up with such disruptive abuse.

  • Anonymous

    regardless of anything else, had Google stood up for customers and been joined by other big internet companies, whether search engines or not, this situation probably wouldn’t have happened. i have no sympathy at all for Google. just like Rapidshare, they keep doing a bit more and a bit more to try to appease the entertainment industries and all that happens is the industries not only expect but actually demand that more blocking, restricting and removing is done. all to protect their own industry whilst doing almost nothing and spending almost nothing to get what they want done. if the big internet companies were maybe to come to their senses and join forces maybe, just maybe there would be some progress made. there certainly isn’t going to be a massive increase in legitimate downloads (full of DRM and everything else nasty the industries can think to include) or over-the-counter sales!

  • http://twitter.com/krozareq krozareq

    The Internet will slowly split off into the darknet where it’s a hobbyist’s dream again like it used to be. Bye bye mainstream iNet.

  • Midas

    My next years resolution:

    Install 40x bittorrent software and explain how it works to people who don’t know.
    35x usenet idem dito.

    There will be links upon links.

  • jaquebauer

    THE RIAA AND OTHERS LIKE IT ARE PART OF THE POLICE STATE. THE GOVERNMENT HAS NO BUSINESS DOING THE DIRTY WORK FOR PRIVATE BUSINESS’S. THAT IS FASCISM. OK UNDER OBAMA WE NOW LIVE IN A FASCIST STATE-THE UNITED FASCIST STATES OF AMERICA.

  • Pingback: RIAA Hammers Google With DMCA Takedowns In Six – TorrentFreak | CompuSys Solutions

  • Guest

    Fucking dinosaurs!

  • reneemjones

    The RIAA thinks that “piracy” is what is cutting their members profits. It is not, but they cannot see it. So, they keep spending money attacking “piracy” and seeing no results. Instead of realizing that what they are doing just does not work (piracy does not affect media spending, as the Swiss know) they keep ratcheting up the pressure. They have an ineffective politcy combined with a religious belief that their ineffective policy *must* work, if only they apply it strongly enough. The result will be nothing but complete disaster, both for the RIAA and for consumers.

  • Vergaralonso

    To hide your ip get a vpn account then
    after that use tor browser to find the links not availables on google!
    Plain and simple!!

  • Vergaralonso

    Get a vpn account to hide your IP
    the use tor to find links not availables
    in google!!

  • http://silverfang77.tumblr.com/ Silver Fang

    Why has the DMCA never been challenged on First Amendment grounds?

  • steve

    I have no problem with DMCA takedown requests as long as they are legitimate. It’s the only legislation that is indirect. I’m happy knowing that these idiots are finally being forced to use DMCA instead of bringing trumped up charges to courtrooms and charging people obscene amounts of money that they cannot obviously afford in their lifetime.

  • Pingback: Links 21/11/2012: GNU/Linux Preinstalled on More Systems, Linux Rootkit Claimed | Techrights

  • wiundiun
  • http://7-books.net/ SleepyJohn

    When I was quite young I was being plagued by the local bully. I tried being friendly and appeasing but it didn’t work, any more than it did for Chamberlain in 1939. When my mother found out she told me that bullies see appeasement as weakness, much like an animal smelling fear, and it simply emboldens them to be worse. The only way to deal with a bully, she said, was to stand up and beat the living shit out of him.

    When next I was accosted by said bully I tried my mother’s advice and was amazed to see him run off squealing for his mummy, blood dripping from his nose. I really, really wish someone rich and powerful, and generally respected by the public, such as Google, would turn on these animals and beat the living, fucking financial shit out of them. And sod the legal technicalities. Surely an arsenal of top-notch lawyers, instructed to remove these creatures from the face of the earth for the benefit of their employers and all mankind, could handle that?

    I see no other solution to what is essentially little more than a bunch of gangsters running an increasingly oppressive protection racket. ‘Safe harbour’? What a lot of bollocks. Why are people falling over themselves to respect what is just a euphemism for “Nice business you’ve got here. Be a shame if something happened to it.”

  • random

    thank you riaa, i never even knew that these wonderful websites existet
    *bookmarks them*

  • Pingback: Google Flooded with Takedown Requests

  • Pingback: ISPs Throttle Internet Pirates

  • Pingback: RIAA Hammers Google With DMCA Takedowns In Six Strikes Prelude | Equipment Dental

  • Marknelson2121

    Nothing will ever stop piracy, these DMCA takedowns can cause serious issues for websites and some of it is over the stupidest things… like I saw on edublog’s served a DMCA over a picture a student uploaded of salami…
    Really wish 21/2012 had been the end of the world…

  • BTGuard - BitTorrent Anonymously

NewsBits

Even more news...

  • Blu-ray Anti-Piracy Tech Stops Discs and Promotes Purchases

    An anti-piracy system present in all official Blu-ray players since 2012 has received a fresh update...

  • Foxtel Breeds Pirates by Locking Up Game of Thrones

    One of the main reasons why people turn to piracy is the lack of legal alternatives....

  • UK Student Admits Breaching Sony Copyrights With Leak of PS3 SDK

    Last year an Internet user known as El Nomeo leaked version 3.70 of Sony’s Playstation3 SDK...

  • Pirates Can Be Identified Despite Sharing IP Addresses, ISP Claims

    Carrier-Grade Network Address Translation is a network mechanism through which many Internet subscribers can share the...

  • Feds Seize Cash from Major Bitcoin Exchange’s Dwolla Account

    The U.S. Government has taken a significant action against the web’s top Bitcoin exchange by seizing...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

PopularArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.