RIAA Sued for Fraud, Abuse and Legal Sham
Written by Ernesto on March 01, 2009It’s been a rough week for the RIAA as massive layoffs are about to cost many employees their job. On top of that, the anti-piracy outfit is being sued for abusing the legal system for its war on piracy, civil conspiracy, deceptive trade practices, trespassing and computer fraud.
Covering the progress in the various RIAA cases has never been one of our top priorities here at TorrentFreak. The legalese and numerous cases seem to drag on forever, or end up in a settlement where the alleged ‘pirate’ pays the record labels a few thousand dollars.
Today’s coverage at both P2Pnet and Ray Beckerman’s blog, however, caught our eye. In what seems to be a classic David versus Goliath story, Shahanda Moursy from North Carolina has demanded a trial against three major record labels and the RIAA.
Also among the defendants is Mediasentry, the company that harvests IP-addresses of alleged copyright infringers. Previously, Mediasentry’s investigation tactics were deemed illegal in several states because it operated without the appropriate and required paperwork. This is one of the many offenses being used in the present claim.
Moursy is suing the RIAA and others for several offenses, but what really caught our eye is the description of the RIAA’s practices. According to the complaint the RIAA and record labels:
…[through] concerted efforts and cartels, control or attempt to control the channels of creation, distribution, and sale of musical works throughout the United States and the world. They are not artists, songwriters, or musicians. They did not write or record the songs. For a number of years, a group of large, multinational, multi-billion dollar record companies, including these [record labels], have been abusing the federal court judicial system for the purpose of waging a public relations and public threat campaign targeting digital file sharing activities.
To us, this indeed seems to be a fairly accurate description, but it’s only the start. As we’ve outlined before, the RIAA tends to target the weak, and aim for an early settlement of a few thousand dollars.
As part of this campaign of their sham litigation program, the [record labels] enhance the intimidation factor by actually filing suit in a number of instances with no prior warning. These suits are designed to attract media attention, and often do, as stories emerge of [record labels'] suits against the elderly, disabled, technologically clueless, and other vulnerable victims. Many of these victims have no idea how to operate a computer, let alone how to install and use peer-to-peer networking software to exchange music they would not likely be listening to anyway. But actual innocence is rarely a consideration to the [record labels].
And on top of that..
[The record labels’] litigation campaign, its preceding demands, and illegal investigations, are part of a concerted pattern of sham litigation. The [record labels'] true purpose is not to obtain the relief claimed in its sham litigation, but to intimidate, harass, and oppress the defendant targets and other users of computer networks.
To many, this will all sound very familiar and it’s good to see Mrs. Moursy’s legal representatives describing the tactics of these outfits so vividly. Over the years, tens of thousands have been harassed and threatened because they allegedly downloaded music illegally, exclusively based on shoddy evidence. Justice is calling.
Previously: How To Turn Customers Into Pirates
Next: Anti-Piracy Action Closes Yet More Fansub Sites
121 Responses
Excellent, Just Excellent!! Pirates FTW
I can’t believe he did that !
He’s my hero!
wow, just…..wow
holy fuck this is great
Kudos to her!
Does she deserve flowers too? I have sure yes!
wow, go Shahanda! Someone needs flowers!
Perhaps people could donate money to Moursy to pay for legal expenses – each person could donate a small amont to Moursey. After all, a big legal battle usually requires a lot of funding.
Let the revolution begin!
DIGG IT DIGG IT
About F***in Time!, A bit taste of their own medicine!
HA! Great news.
this is payback! crappie riaa
This is not news. If it ever makes it to court, then, yes, it would be news then. Until then, though, this is just a lot of hot air.
How can I contribute to this cause? Donations, volunteer work, research? I’ll do anything to see these no goods get what they deserve.
@11:
And yet, people want to hear about it. It is my opinion that things like this, as long as they’re big enough, should be posted regardless of whether it classifies as whatever your definition of news happens to be. Not just because it’s interesting, which it is, but because it spreads the word that this sort of thing (suing the RIAA, etc.) is possible and clearly within the grasp of any intelligent individual willing to dig up some dirt.
To add to 13, I hate lawsuits and feel they dig into the pockets of taxpayers for nothing but a few throw-away bucks and harassment. The RIAA and related companies, however, deserve this in so many ways. Hopefully this case goes through, and they lose every dime and then some of all the settlement money they’ve accumulated over the years.
statement from his lawyer says it all for me.
no letter for me.
cant catch mah yall!
People are starting to wake up
Judge Declares Mistrial In RIAA’s Only Court Victory
from the jammie-thomas-gets-a-second-chance dept
The RIAA’s only court victory in its years-long legal battle against individuals who engage in unauthorized file sharing has been declared a mistrial, and the $222,000 fine against Jammie Thomas has been thrown out. Jammie Thomas may now face a new trial, but this time, the jury will be instructed that the record labels need to have shown actual infringement — and that simply making files available is not infringement. This is a pretty huge loss for the RIAA, who had been running around like crazy using the Thomas verdict to (a) claim that the courts recognize that “making available” is infringement and (b) that this case somehow proves that file sharers will get huge fines. Yet, now the RIAA is back to having no actual court victories against file sharers, and its “making available = infringement” argument is once again rejected.
Perhaps equally as interesting, in declaring the mistrial, Judge Davis also called upon Congress to change the ridiculous fines that can be levied on file sharers, noting that they seem to be way, way out of proportion to the seriousness of the act:
The Court would be remiss if it did not take this opportunity to implore Congress to amend the Copyright Act to address liability and damages in peer-to-peer network cases such as the one currently before this Court. . . . While the Court does not discount Plaintiffs’ claim that, cumulatively, illegal downloading has far-reaching effects on their businesses, the damages awarded in this case are wholly disproportionate to the damages suffered by Plaintiffs
http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/09/not-for-publica.html
FINALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLY!
The World is Ours
KickaZZ
Oh shit…
We’ve seen how badly the music industry performs in court. They need to hire some real experts, or they’re screwed.
Hey, I know. The RIAA should hire The Pirate Bay to represent them :D
Awesome im glad somebody is actually fighting back!
Hoo Fucking Ray !! Time to tear these evil companies apart.
I’m an artist and this made me smile allot!
Mirror : http://backupurl.com/t8h8px
Yeeeah! Fantastic!
Arghhh
Rum for everyone!
I’d really like seeing them push the angle about their corporate attempts at controlling world art and culture, turning it into the bland, government approved, Pepsi and MTV generation and focus group designed, placid american/teen idol bands, and flooding us with that insipid product over controlled media.
That’s really what the RIAA’s fight is about, controlling the media, itself, and thereby the content on it, which is used to market false images and idols rather than any real talent that could inspire, consol or rally.
They’re giving up the court battle only because they realize now it’s cheaper, and entirely possible if not probable, to buy off the medium itself, once again, by having the willing ISPs in their pockets.
I think they could easily make this the class action lawsuit of all time.
pointless
this is more like an ant versus a planet… she has no chance in hell.
like i said , THEY ARE NOT ARTISTS, its a business and any business that acts in this fashion is committing a terrorist act against its people as they are not acting in either good faith nor in the consumers interests NOR in any fashion helpful to the product ( NOT ART) they are delivering.
IF it is art it is meant to be shared, copyright was meant to give that creationist person a little back not have it all and put people in prison for seeing there art, or bankrupt them for seeing it.
Think about star trek when you envision a true Utopian society and guess what there still are corporations, but there control and “power” has been removed in favor of HELPING not hindering by way of economic controls.
I foresaw this kind os suit with words and as i said i mentioned the very same terminology before.
WOULD Hollywood donate a batman movie freely to the masses NOPE there fore it is a product NOT art.
The RIAA has harrassed me and I hope they get their day in court.
F U RIAA!!!!!!!!!
RIAA can suck my D***
I’ll testify. I’ve been accused of downloading a song that I didn’t download, and would love to smack back.
RIAA, we comin’ fo you, *****
The riaa will try to bribe the judge who hears this case, and pressure him to throw it out and let the riaa off the hook. That is what cartels do and the riaa is infinite times worse than opec.
Going after the weak, poor, and elderly is wrong. The fact that this cartel backed repressive sham litigation is allowed is is really depressing. I would like to see a list of musicians who fund the riaa because I would like to boycott their music. The musicians who fund the riaa are funding a form a terrorism because the riaa’s goal is to strike fear in the heart of citizens who try to help their community and share. It is fundamentally unethical to take away peoples freedom and right to help each other.
It’s been tough for anti-P2P organizations lately. MediaSentry loses it’s biggest contract: supplying the RIAA lawsuit machine. Then mass-layoffs are announced at RIAA’s headquarters — as well as occurring at MediaDefender; even the company’s CEO and its president were recently sacked in the aftermath of Mediadefender (or what’s left of it) being taken over by its creditors.
Revision3 needs to launch their lawsuit(s) while there’s still anything left to sue.
Just so you know, it is not against the law to allow your wireless router to be without security. It’s legally your choice to do that.
If the RIAA/MPAA comes after you through your ISP, tell them that you are running an open wireless router and it could be someone else downloading crap. No one can force you to lock up your router.
Someone please post a tracker and the official method to donate to the cause.
Screw the RIAA and the horse it rode in on!
Agreed, piss on em! Hope this is the nail that drives them under!
be-anonymous.us.tc
@35 – the ‘unsecured network’ myth of legal defense can easily be broken down by a half-skilled prosecution team. Just because you didn’t have the mind to secure your wireless does not in any way dismiss all personal responsibility for how YOUR connection is used. Thats like telling the police that its not your fault that drug dealers happened to be using your home, simply because you left the front door unlocked.
Sound ridiculous? It is.
Beyond that – there is yet hope the lawsuit will make it to court, though we may never hear about it depending on how the defense tries to hush up information from coming out.
Win or lose, I say keep the RIAA in court as long as possible and drain their funds like they’ve been doing to all the trackers. I say it’s just as good a use of taxpayer money as bailing out the stockmarket douchebags.
Yes, FINALLY, someone sees it the way the rest of us do!
It’s a shame. the record industry has not always been the enemy. They could’ve chosen to reinvented themselves go out in style, but now they’re just a disgrace.
what kills the above BS in a nut shell
is the word unsecured
What if i don’t want it secured, is there a law that says i have to keep the door locked on my house NOPE
and if someone breaks in and uses my house for a murder , does that mean im responsible, NO but i sure am stupid for leaving the door open.
in the case of my computer WHY dont we all just open it up why not , if you notice there are just as many ways in fact to hack linux BUT guess what they arent being targeted and guess what they usually are faster servers etc. So guess what also , that means the target is windows in that case not the user.
We can simply get rules made and more laws made for spammers and virii if you want.
if every person on earth had NO security on wireless and i’ll add almost EVERY wireless connection is HACKABLE so to even say you can secure them is well YOU being UNINFORMED. In fact wireless anything is WAY more UNSECURE then convention closed in the ground on a wire line.
NO one can tell me otherwise, and the fact that YOUR data is WAY more easily spoofable and thus they get it and no matter what will crack you means DONT USE WIRELESS IF YOU WANT BETTER SECURITY. BUT WAIT every major ISP knowing this has expanded wireles.
GEE wonder why…..
—-
oh ya and so by the guys reasoning , most people dont JUST let drug dealers into the home, but say that YOU forgot to lock the door OMG does that happen? Or one of them is a lock smith or OMG they just break the lock and go in while you are away and use the home for whatever purpose.
YOU say th eowner of the house is guilty of drug dealing?
THATS ABOUT AS STUPID AS IT GETS.
adlib
by that reasoning all hammers from canadian tire MUST be removed as canuck tire is liable of murder ( i know for a fact a hammer was used in a murder so making them available must be a federal offense)
“WOULD Hollywood donate a batman movie freely to the masses NOPE there fore it is a product NOT art.”
——————————–
so is the “sistine chapel” not a work of art? it was a COMMISSIONED piece that michelangelo (among others) was HIRED to create. i defy you to find an art historian or critic who doesn’t believe it to be one of, if not THE, greatest works of art of all time by one of, if not THE greatest artists of all time…who SOLD the abundance of his work!
charging money for art does not negate the artistry. the abundance of great works were created for commission or to be sold upon completion.
your supposed definition of art does not exist in any dictionary. it’s just something you (no doubt a fourteen year old boy with nary a hair on his balls) made up in a dank corner of your parent’s basement while staring into the green-blue glow of your only friend.
keep collecting bogus ip addys from tpb & keep on failing riaa
Awesome! Though I wish that we could channel the outrage into action. Giving five bucks to the defense fund would be a start.
I applied, but someone needs to get her a better lawyer. The language used above seems very amateur for a legal filing. Maybe she should contact the EFF?
Above “I applied” should read “I applaud her”…the perils of speech recognition!
epic fail
@34, http://www.riaaradar.com/
As far as I know the only song on my iPod that the an RIAA member company has copyrights to is rickroll (I make “portable” speakers using computer speaker amps as a pseudo-hobby, so a rickroll is always needed). If I had the money for it, I would buy every single track on my iPod except for the rickroll =). Doesn’t look like I’ll be able to get a job anytime soon though..
I hope every single employee of the RIAA chokes on dick and dies, and the company goes Bankrupt.
I always thought that if I ever came into a lot of money, I would pick a legal fight with the RIAA exactly like this. Kudos. You wonder if there’s any chance of turning this into a class action lawsuit. I’d be all in for that.
@ #39 I wouldn’t say home… I’d say if some mobsters stole your car, and used it to do a few drive-bys.. does that make you responsible for the drive-bys since you left your car door unlocked?
Sound ridiculous? It is.
@51 thanks for the link
http://moviefox.org
@35 I agree with you that the wireless defence is really a very strong argument. It is the truth, in reality there is no way to secure your router 100% unless you live in a lead or copper home.
Hell Fucking Yeah! Fuck you RIAA
*claps*
Well done! Sue the bastards!
Notice how the record companies/RIAA appear to operate a lot like the Church of Scientology does.
L. Ron Hubbard actually said before: “The purpose of the suit is to harass and discourage rather than to win. The law can be used very easily to harass, and enough harassment on somebody who is simply on the thin edge anyway, well knowing that he is not authorized, will generally be sufficient to cause his professional decease. If possible, of course, ruin him utterly.”
Sounds about right I think.
Epic Win! its about time this happened!
RIAA has more than 1.600 music labels as members, but the “big 4″ is:
* EMI
* Sony Music Entertainment
* Universal Music Group
* Warner Music Group
If you want to boycott RIAA, boycott them!
Full list of member labels:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_RIAA_member_labels
i have $20 to spare if this case makes it to court, and thats $20 that otherwise would have been spent on buying the new lamb of god album (i think ill torrent that instead now)
all of these companys try to make new laws and enforce the laws that are already there but it always back fires in their faces. looks like it even back fires for the politicians who they have in their pocket like this story http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/02/28/2237212
Having your wireless router open makes you a service provider(you just want to offer free internet to the hood).
And under DMCA law, you are not responsable.
Otherwise, ISPs should be sued, cuz they are the true owners of those IPs and they provide you the means to download music.
woot woot woot
and who is Shahanda Moursy exactly? a nobody. and that’s why this case will never make it to court.
the ifpi trolls are now out.
Hey look, a torrentfreak article!
http://torrentfreak.com/uk-file-sharers-and-the-wireless-defense-080717/
the key point being
“Noting Robertsons comments, in preparing a wireless defense, evidence from a router showing that others have accessed the device (multiple MAC addresses in the logs, for example) could prove vital in tipping the scales in the favor of the defendant.”
meaning that if you open up your router after the fact, its not enough.
Mind you, that might be enough to get away with it in the UK – but as far as I know in the US, as the saying goes, that sh*t doesn’t fly very far. They will go so far as to confiscate your computers, search for the illegal software, and trace the logs down to your computer itself if thats what it takes to put you down.
I suppose you blokes are a bit luckier than the rest of us then, hm?
@64 a/s/l
another/shithead/lawyer
@67 i wish i could be proved wrong. i’ll eat my own smelly socks if this makes it to court. but it won’t.
Good man :)
F**k RIAA!
“It is about 90-100+ people across the US and global offices – anti-piracy, coordinated IFPI/BPI etc – trust me it’s a bloodbath…
Good luck lady. We’re all behind you
Its about time guys, ive been waiting for this to happen.
Now its the RIAA’s turn to run…
What comes around goes around and smacks you twice as hard,
They been smacked Twice as hard xD
Bout time everyone found out what these people are really like, spread the world all & by 2010 the riaa will be dead & buried.
Ahhh then the earth will be cleansed
:0)
Her attorney should use the Chewbacca defense
About fsckin’ time this happened!!!
Though as others have said, it may not make it to court. Unless a certain New York Country Lawyer* becomes involved. Then there’s a better chance of that.
As for other comments about comparing the RIAA to $cientology, it would be great if somehow they and the RIAA could be tricked into suing one another. Kill two birds with one stone as the old adage goes.
*For those who may not know, New York Country Lawyer is none other than anti-RIAA lawyer Ray Beckermann.
@60 I’ll definitely boycott purchasing music from the big 4.
It seems like there are trolls leaving comments here don’t feed the riaa.
At last, we see the light at the end of the tunnel.
OMG its the train!
Fuck the RIAA! FUCK EM!
@45
Art is sold, but it can be seen and displayed for free, thus it’s art, if you were to see a movie for free but not own it such as the movie industry does not us, we’d get in trouble for it, make sense?
Doesn’t seem like digital piracy is wrong unless you’re selling it.
The Sistine Chapel, while a commissioned work, is still available for the public, and those who attended services at that location, full view of the work.
Quite a bit of a difference from the absolute control of recorded music performance we deal with today.
what they need is a class-action suit — and with all the people they sued and had paid them in the past with the bogus evidence, all those people should join up now and class action the riaa and other companies that forced them to pay what wasnt necessary
It is a sad world where protecting ones intellectual property is a sue-able offense.
“Art is sold, but it can be seen and displayed for free, thus it’s art.”
————
again, i must reiterate, your fake, made up, BS, definition of “art” DOES NOT EXIST IN ANY DICTIONARY! please stop debating like it does. it only makes you look stupid.
“make sense?”
————-
no.
“The Sistine Chapel, while a commissioned work, is still available for the public, and those who attended services at that location, full view of the work.”
————————
yes it is available to the public…FOR AN ENTRANCE FEE OF FIFTEEN EURO!
you’ve obviously never been there so why are you arguing with me out of complete and utter ignorance? for fun? are you just bored? do you actually have anything valid (that is, rooted in reality) to offer to this debate?
“Quite a bit of a difference from the absolute control of recorded music performance we deal with today.”
——————
no. quite similar. both are commissioned or otherwise appropriated (for money) works that the buyer/owner than charges people a fee to access.
almost all of the world’s top museums charge an entrance fee, does that make the art inside their walls nothing more than soulless products?
of course not.
…unless of course you’re a fourteen year old idiot on torrent freak who thinks he has the whole world figured out.
fail.
2 comments
1) Very true that RIAA-member record labels are only “out for the bucks” and could care less about the artists. Take a look at how SONY/BMG chief Clive Davis has screwed over his artists by forcing them to sing the crap written by weak song-writers and then dropping them when their records don’t sell. (Multiple former American Idol contestants come to mind here.)
2) It’s so easy to tap into wireless networks of the naive. For example, there’s a condo resort I’ve been to which gives free wi-fi for all tenants. In the whole complex, the password for each router is “12345″ and the password never changes.
Seems like an accurate description of what the recording industry has been up to. I’m glad someone is standing up to them, and has retained an attorney capable of so vividly illustrating exactly what is wrong with the current situation. It’s high-time the industry was made to answer for these practices. That it’s finally been put on record is a step in the right direction. I’ll be following this case closely in the hopes that it gets brought to trial.
Everybody should sue them. There are milions of us.
It’s about god damn time!I was shocked when the RIAA turned their litigation into an extortion scheme. It was unbelievable. A while back they stopped filing lawsuits all together and instead sent out notices telling people to go to their website and to pay a settlement fee BEFORE they filed any court papers. Basically telling people that if they didn’t cough up a couple thousand dollars they were going to get sued. Even if you’re innocent, you’re stuck either paying the RIAA to leave you alone because it would cost more to get an attorney and fight their corporate legal team (and risk losing and paying even more).
I’m surprised the government didn’t step in and stop it right away.
May 31 is national Piracy day! Support the community and TPB by uploading and downloading as many torrents as you can!
http://www.thepiratebay.org
RIAA, you make a mockery of the artists you represent. Whenever a promising artist comes out you make them a sign a contract stating they get so and so dollars but YOU get the final say on what the CD sounds like. You try and control our culture and make 2-3 hits songs on a album when the rest suck. We want the artist to make there shit NOT YOU. WE DON’T CARE IF sex sells because if the music rocks but the lyrics are bulls**t, why would we buy a album that isn’t worthy to be my dogs chew toy? F**k off RIAA we don’t want you censorship, we don’t want you ideas, and we don’t want ALBUMS WRITTEN BY YOU. We want real artist pouring there souls into a CD that’s worth my 16 bucks. PISS OFF AND STOP YOU F**KEN BULLS***!
it’s time for revenge with mean vengeance
Awesome stuff.
———
TPB FTW
———
Stick it to the f-in man!
FUCK the RIAA.
music is something to be shared and shared freely.
brilliant, EPIC WIN!
On the turning away
From the pale and downtrodden
And the words they say
Which we wont understand
Dont accept that whats happening
Is just a case of others suffering
Or youll find that youre joining in
The turning away
Its a sin that somehow
Light is changing to shadow
And casting its shroud
Over all we have known
Unaware how the ranks have grown
Driven on by a heart of stone
We could find that were all alone
In the dream of the proud
On the wings of the night
As the daytime is stirring
Where the speechless unite
In a silent accord
Using words you will find are strange
And mesmerized as they light the flame
Feel the new wind of change
On the wings of the night
No more turning away
From the weak and the weary
No more turning away
From the coldness inside
Just a world that we all must share
Its not enough just to stand and stare
Is it only a dream that therell be
No more turning away?
it is wrong for a man have a rich woman or a woman have a wealthy man?It is an absolutely extramarital relationship. but more and more services come out on
Internet focusing on this kind of relationship.such as__S e e k r i c h . c o m___it’s the biggest dating site for wealthy and successful people.
WOOT. THEY DESERVE EVERYTHING THEY GET.
i love this!!!
lets have a moment of silence for everyone at RIAA, those that lost their jobs, and those that are going to.
alright lets party!!!
how can we send money to help her beat the riaa
If every1 did this the RIAA would die.
no tears there! Good for someone to stand up to these bullies!
FIGHT FIRE WITH FIRE! LOL
Hold the torch woman.Sisters are doing it for everyone.
Yarrrr Harrrr….The RIAA be walkin’ thar own plank!
FUCK RIAA!
AN HERO! Finally someone has some sense.
@91
The Metropolitan Museum of art in New York does not charge an entrance fee. They have suggested donations, but you are allowed to pay as much or as little as you want for entrance.
This is the best thing to happen since Jack Thompson got pwnd
“The Metropolitan Museum of art in New York does not charge an entrance fee. They have suggested donations, but you are allowed to pay as much or as little as you want for entrance.”
———————-
i know. the operative word you seemed to have missed is “almost”.
your example also doesn’t change the fact that commerce and art are not mutually exclusive despite what a few anarchist retards (roze) on TF would have you believe.
freetard, get a life, and stop bickering. Instead, support Shahanda and what she is doing. Don’t use it as an excuse to argue with and be-little peoples oppinions.
oh, and FYI, art SHOULD be free, but it rarely is.
If the RIAA sold their movies online, and in stores for LESS and with more FREE CRAP i like…well i’d buy them. Already, the ones I like I buy. Do something, you suing faggots (apologies to cool faggots) rather than sue millions of people.
“art SHOULD be free”
—–
whatever YOU do for a living should be done for FREE.
Finally.
I really do hope this case won’t take forever.
MediaSentry i have some docs TO SHOW TO THE WORLD I NEED HELP its all ready rar up im am filling a compliant tues next week. there in deep s@it
plus i need help if there any MediaSentry in new jersey please
I AM SO P@ST OFF I GOT A dam letter from those ass hole im sorry for being nasty would anyone like to see POST UT EVERWHERE YOU CAN
as you can read the first paragraph
Thepoet623 (11:42:51):
RE; Unauthorized Distribution of copyrighted motion picture entitled
YES MAN
we are writing this letter on behalf of Warner Bros. Entertainment inc. (”Warner Bros.”)
We have received information that an individual has utilized the below-referenced IP address at the noted date and time to offer downloads of copyrighted motion picture(s)
WHAT THE F@@K OK guys i have it scanned and ready for everyone to see i need help in order to find the right spot to upload so every one to see/ you can also see MediaSentry in there too im so mad i need a lawyer fast. first off all i didnt even upload or Distribute any film.
please help
HERE MY AIM
thepoet623@aol.com
thepoet623
as a matter in fact i will POST THIS ON YOUTUBE AND MYSPACE IM BUGGING THE F@@K OUT.
im sorry for my writing please forgive me.
18 references to this post
Responses are closed
All remaining responses will continue to be archived. Use the TorrentFreak forums if you want to discuss something.