TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

UK Government Abandons File-Sharing Website Blocking Plans

Plans to block websites alleged to facilitate copyright infringement are to be dropped by the UK government. The announcement was made by Business secretary Vince Cable following a review by communications regulator OFCOM which found that blocking provisions in the Digital Economy Act would not be effective. Nevertheless, website blocking will be attempted, just by other means.

Outlining the government’s response to the Hargreaves report, business secretary Vince Cable today confirmed that the website blocking provisions put in place under the country’s controversial Digital Economy Act will be abandoned.

As widely predicted, a review by communications regulator OFCOM found that the plans were unworkable.

“Ofcom was also asked to consider whether the site-blocking provisions in the Digital Economy Act would work in practice,” began today’s statement from the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills.

“The Act contains reserve powers to allow courts to order that websites dedicated to copyright infringement are blocked. The regulator concluded the provisions as they stand would not be effective and so the Government will not bring forward the Act’s site-blocking provisions at this time.”

While some will see the decision as a victory for common sense, it does not necessarily follow that there will be no site blocking in the UK.

As the recent MPA v BT case showed all too clearly, existing legislation (the Copyrights, Design and Patents Act) is now deemed powerful enough to carry out the same function. The ruling in that case ordered ISP BT to block all subscriber access to Usenet indexing site Newzbin2.

However, without the assistance of the now-nuked provisions of the Digital Economy Act, copyright holders may be forced to go “the long way round” to get sites blocked, i.e through the legal system and existing legislation.

But as complicated as it was, the Newzbin2 case had a number of special features (such as a previous UK court ruling against Newzbin1) which helped the case along and through to ultimate success for the MPA. Relatively speaking, future legal attempts will not be as easy.

“The MPA focus until now has been on this Newzbin case and not beyond it,” the MPA told TorrentFreak when asked about future site-blocking plans. “Although there will be other targets, no decisions have yet been made.”

“However, other rights-holders have been watching the case with interest and may well have their own target rogue sites,” the MPA concludes.

But of course, there are still ongoing discussions between the government, rights-holders and ISPs concerning the voluntary blocking of websites, something which the MPA and international music industry will be keen to pursue.

Other elements of Cable’s announcement, such as the creation of a Digital Copyright Exchange, the relaxation of laws which currently forbid UK citizens from format-shifting their own legally purchased media, and the permitting of parody works without copyright-holder permission, can be read here.

Related Posts

Previous Post | Next Post

  • Gregoryfenton

    Finally a victory for common sense.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Melvin-Burton/777096131 Melvin Burton

      Nothings been implemented yet and the copyright lobby may well lobby hard against this.

      • Greg

        “abandons” sounds pretty final to me.

        The copyright lobby already have what they want with the ability to block websites without resorting to the DEA, so there is no need for it.

        The government comes out of this one looking like a hero for the common man without actually stopping their golden goose (the lobbyists) being able to prevent infringement another way.

        • Bubbo

          Its doesn’t matter how it sounds, it what is done that counts.

          Vince cable has been corrected before for making the wrong statements and the government doesn’t care what the public think, I can’t see the copyright industry letting this go without a fight, after all that effort to get the law passed in the first place.

    • Randomuser

      Not! From the report:

      “Following advice from Ofcom – which the
      Government is publishing today – site
      blocking will not be brought forward at
      this time. However, the Government is
      keen to explore the issues raised by
      Ofcom’s report and will do more work
      on what other measures can be pursued
      to tackle online copyright infringement.”

    • http://twitter.com/icanhazsake Ninja

      Somewhat. The bill is still there. It shouldn’t even be there for discussion. It’s complete lunacy.

  • Wellisntthatspecial

    oh gee look more news about the
    digitial TAX economy act

  • Wellisntthatspecial

    and this should be news
    “the MPA told TorrentFreak”

  • Wellisntthatspecial

    and what is a rogue site that is operated by the person who actualy runs it…UM not rogue, the mpa is a shitterd

  • Wellisntthatspecial

    and what is a rogue site that is operated by the person who actualy runs it…UM not rogue, the mpa is a shitterd

  • Dididavetracker

    Having seen on the news today and the internet yesterday about your new copyright reforms i feel that some finer points of the reform may not be clear to us after the speech.

    As stated in the press “individuals to burn copies of purchased content” ?
    Is this just to be Music and Film or any purchased content such as games software ect ect.
    If so how due other uk laws effect this change due to DRM on many content formats DVD for one ?

    At this time to create a copy of a DVD as suggested would mean that a user would have to use software or hardware that circumvents DRM restrictions placed on the disks to enable them to create a legal copy of said content.Are the laws to be put in place to allow for this ?
    For a user to use a soon to be legal backup of there purchased content other factors also come into play such as the manufactures of said hardware prevent the use of backup’s so any backup’s or disks made wont work ? which seems wrong as it’s soon to be legal in law to make them ?

    Software on all formats of systems be it game systems or computer dont allow the use of a backup copy and even more so on game systems which if found to be using a copy the users are then banned from other services such as XBOX Live ?

    To get a copy of the software to even work means a user has to circumvent the DRM restrictions placed on the system via the means of a Mod Chip or software in some cases.
    In doing so the users may well then banned from there systems and functions disabled on there hardware or there accounts ?
    All this for using a so called soon to be legal copy of the users purchased content disks.

    Some quick facts
    “The courts ruling says “game copiers” are illegal to import, advertise and sell in the UK.”
    “The mere fact that the device can be used for a non-infringing purpose is not a defence”

    Biggest Concerns
    “The biggest concerns in relation to access to works and duplication of works – both activities being essential for preservation purposes or the format shifting of a users purchased items as suggested in the new laws.
    The first concern pertains to the fact that where DRM (applied to works in digital format or to ancillary software used to access those works) becomes obsolete and the relevant manufacturers are not willing to provide updates or have gone out of business, Users then find itself with digital content that it can no longer have access to and unable, by law, to circumvent. The obsolescence of a DRM could render an item purchased inaccessible or the very fact it’s part of the purchased item.
    The second preservation concern is that, presently, where a DRM prevents copying (and the users are unable, by law, to circumvent) reproduction of a work for preservation purposes is impossible.”

    If these matters are not cleared up in the next few days i’m sure it’s going to get very confusing for the users and the police and manufactures as to what is right and what is wrong and will have the effect of making it that millions of people may still be breaking the law, with many unaware they are doing it , due to the complex nature of the DRM placed on such purchased content and the systems used to use such content.

    P2P…
    As a P2P site are we able to provide a backup to those users unable to or lack the skills they need to create a working backup of there disks ect ?
    As the uploader would have had a fully legal version to being with on the sections like dvd rip music albums ect ect were are just providing a service to those unable or unwilling to take the time to produce a working backup.
    Providing a DRM free version is another option as a user may not have the know how of how to do this or the tolls to do so ???

    • Anonymous

      You are hitting the nail on the head.

    • http://twitter.com/icanhazsake Ninja

      That.

      This shouldn’t be an issue. DRM shouldn’t exist. Simple as that.

      I’m somewhat knowledgeable so I simply workaround the DRM. The average Joe on the other hand suffers with it =)

      So DRM succeeds in annoying who doesn’t ‘pirate’. Amusing.

  • http://twitter.com/WillTovey Will Tovey

    I have a feeling that the celebrations here may be a little premature. DCMS only said that the web-blocking plans in the Digital Economy Act were “unlikely to be effective because of the slow speed that would be expected from a full court process.” Reading the documents published (particularly page 7 of http://www.culture.gov.uk/images/publications/Next-steps-for-implementation-of-the-Digital-Economy-Act.pdf ) they are still committed to tackling “illegal” websites (the websites aren’t actually illegal) just through ways that don’t involve courts – such as by blocking payments, advertising revenue and search-engine filtering. They’re also still looking at web-blocking but in ways that involve voluntary agreements with ISPs – so don’t require a court.

  • Pingback: Moving slowly towards the future – Spectator.co.uk

  • Jack

    Something else in the small print today is about right of appeal if you receive a notice of infringement under the DEA. It’s going to cost you £20 to appeal.

    Taken from the Government’s news portal;
    “The Government has decided to introduce a £20 fee for subscribers wishing to appeal detected instances of unlawful sharing of copyright material they have been notified about. The fee will be refunded if the appeal is successful.

    A report by Ofcom, which is published today, identifies a risk of the system being overwhelmed by vexatious appeals from people determined to disrupt the system. Government expects that a £20 fee should deter appeals without deterring genuine appeals.”

    http://nds.coi.gov.uk/content/detail.aspx?NewsAreaId=2&ReleaseID=420683&SubjectId=2

    Good ole right of access to justice in the UK eh ? But isn’t this all still up for review by the EU anyway since the UK Parliament signed away our sovereignty.

    • http://torrentfreak.com/ Rob8urcakes

      Yet another example of the switch from innocent until proven guilty, to guilty-so-suffer&pay-to-prove-innocence.

      The justice system is being usurped by Hollywood, the MAFIAA and all other big businesses who think they ought to rule the World, and it’s NOT acceptable.

      Write to your MP, write to the Secretary of State for the DCMS and write to your MEP too (ie Member of the European Parliament) to ask this horrendously unfair and biased measure be dropped before more inhumanity to our fellow humans is committed by “civilised peoples”.

      • Anonymous

        I can only believe this will cause more people to run open wireless routers.

        “Here is the £20. I run a lawful open wireless router. Thanks for my £20 back. See you again next week”

        • http://twitter.com/icanhazsake Ninja

          That. Or better, you can claim your wireless security was broken OR your ip was spoofed. Or that you never downloaded that anyway and you dunno why you received the warn(s). This shit has so many flaws that I honestly lol at the futile attempt from MAFIAA in this case ;)

        • Anonymous

          They seem to forget that the greatest infringers are also the ones that spend the most on buying media. Not to forget computer systems, home cinema systems and more. Do these sound a class of people not able to afford this £20? They should also be skillful enough to win their cases.

          My concern would more be a single mother of 3. The type who spends all her spare cash on raising her kids. She only uses her computer for paying the bills and online shopping and where she knows nothing about BT. Instead the infringer is her neighbour who seemed so helpful to fix her computer problem once and noted down her wireless key. Lack of funds, lack of knowledge and most likely to write it off as misplaced and bin it.

          At least they won’t be cutting her off.

  • Cynic

    I don’t know where people are iwht this, but it appears that the first pdf of the report put up on the internet suffers from the same redaction blunder as was in those FoI responses and details of OFCOMS analysis of site blocking is already circulating.

    See

    http://www.lightbluetouchpaper.org/

    and

    http://www.tjmcintyre.com/2011/08/site-blocking-what-uk-government-would.html

    Needless to say, the Minister for Closing Stable Doors After the Horse Has Gone has had the original taken down.

  • Randomuser

    wtf. governments news also states that they are going to implement a copyright infringement notification regime to “educate users about copyright” with a 20 pound tax for those who wish to contest that their connection was used. in other words one is presumed to be guilty until proven otherwise.

    “The Government has decided to introduce a £20 fee for subscribers wishing to appeal detected instances of unlawful sharing of copyright material they have been notified about. The fee will be refunded if the appeal is successful.

    A report by Ofcom, which is published today, identifies a risk of the system being overwhelmed by vexatious appeals from people determined to disrupt the system. Government expects that a £20 fee should deter appeals without deterring genuine appeals.”

    • http://tinyurl.com/ANoiXioNA-personal-info ANoiXioNA

      Agree… And where is the £20 fee to “”deter vexatious”" accusations ?

      £20 per pay up or else letter…. That would be unfair ?..even as they have no proof..

      Scales of justice…tampered with……and heavily weighted…

    • Danny

      WTF indeed.

      Surely they should be proving that you broke the ‘law’ and not the other way round. In addition a tax to enable you to defend yourself doesn’t sound right at all!

  • Voicefromthesky

    OK, after having read all the government PDF-s, all I can say is that they are full of pro-business & pro-strong copyright bullsh1t.

    Basically they say that, yes, a lot of the industry funded research sucks, but we will use it anyway. Or if there are no research it is better to just “guess and do it anyway”.

    They have stopped plans to block websites, but only for now. ICE style DNS blocking is on the way. As are large scale copyright propaganda efforts.

    Government acknowledges that public interest and fairness are also important, but they do not care anyway as their main goal is to support businesses.

    Third parties will certainly be included in future copyright fights and ISP-s will be made copyright cops in the future.

    And so on and so on.

    • http://torrentfreak.com/ Rob8urcakes

      I can hear copywrong trolls and their corrupt lawyers whooping with joy and smacking their cash registers in triumphant ecstasy.

      They may have won this small squabble in the UK, but the battle for freedom continues – and remember guys, when you impoverish and enslave too many people using the legal system, you will eventually see justice through cooperation and solidarity prevail by the majority.

      History tells us this is true – so come ahead you MAFIAA fucktards, we’re ready for you.

    • Scary Devil Monastery

      “ICE style DNS blocking is on the way. As are large scale copyright propaganda efforts.”

      Both of which are likely to fail and fall just as hard as their US counterparts have done. Blocking isn’t possible at any level as long as people can still own personal computers and have internet connections.

      I do predict another explosive rise of darknet use however.

  • Pingback: UK Government Abandons File-Sharing Website Blocking Plans | Torrents & File Sharing News

  • Cynic

    Another aspect that needs an eye keeping on it are “fair use” proposals.

    Hargreaves said that consumers should be able to platform shift as fair use and did not confine that to any particular type of media.

    He also said that rightsholders should not be able to override fair use – fair use was an exception decided by legislators and not some sort of option at the whim of the rightsowner.

    Yet this does not address the issue of DRM that obstructs copying content where that is necessary to platform shift. Hargreaves referred to licensing terms that sought to remove fair use but not technical measures. If the UK Government are serious about this, they need to address these aspects in detail

    But already, some reports are confining this to CD’s and not mentioning other types of media.

    • Scary Devil Monastery

      “Yet this does not address the issue of DRM that obstructs copying content where that is necessary to platform shift.”

      Unless a bunch of hyper-advanced big-eyed grays show up and hands the industry a super-science DRM equivalent which butts heads with Clarke’s Law then that acronym will just continue to stand for “Doesn’t Really Matter”.

      As long as you can play back media on a computer you can re-record the raw data coming out. It’s that simple.

  • Pingback: UK Government Abandons File-Sharing Website Blocking Plans

  • Legion

    £20 to appeal a ‘Pay up or else’ letter?
    Does nobody at all see the irony?

  • Greg

    Yeah, looks like Andrew Crossley is back in business :P

  • Jeff Bekcer

    Now only if America realized… oh wait… it is run by retarded corporate puppets, they’re fucked.

  • http://torrentfreak.com/ Rob8urcakes

    OK so the UK government proposes that people MUST pay a ransom of £20 to challenge each and every unproven allegation of copywrong infringement. Or what?
    wtf happens if we just pile up the allegations wrongful or not?

    lol – this is a crock of shit that can only end in sorrow for ALL sides, including the fecken government.

    It’s like that daft idea of clothing social fucktards in orange overalls or orange hoodies. It just created a new peer group of those to be admired and/or feared.

    The root problem is capitalism simply doesn’t work in ALL areas of human activity and we need cooperation with each other rather than this stupid and stultifying crap of unproven allegations of theft/infringement and defence or protection.

    And we’ve the cheek to call ourselves civilised and “top of the food chain” lol I don’t think so.

  • Anonymous

    I am left somewhat vexed and confused by this announcement.

    My first thought is that they are wrong. As undesirable as it is then website blocking can indeed reduce infringement. It is not about stopping the hard core sharers, who can always find their way, but about stopping the average person simply browsing and finding a tasty download. If the door is locked their curiosity is blocked and they walk on infringement free.

    Then I recall why such mass censorship is not such a good idea. There is also such a thing as Creative Common and when they bring their sledgehammer down on copyright infringement there will be a vast volume of artists annoyed that access to their media marked “sharing ok” has been blocked.

    Hell then there are the likes like Lady Gaga who says she does not mind her fans sharing her music. This girl is proving highly successful and so her philosophy in life is hurting her none. Sharing the enjoyment of music is what fans have always done and the Internet has changed that little. So would she really want mass censorship blocking her obtaining yet more fans and yet more money?

    Then when has politics ever cared about these aspects? The copyright cartel do not lobby/bribe politicians to think such thoughts. “Hit them hard they say. We must eradicate them. 3 Hollywood babies die of starvation every week! Our boss had to cancel his Ferrari order! Infringers are responsible. Kill them all !!!”

    I am even starting to fear that they may turn this DEA into something… cough… cough… nice.

    Killing off the 3 strikes letter campaign previously and now the mass censorship aspect of site blocking is indeed killing off the worst aspects. The author unknown media library for broadcast use without infringement risk is actually a very good thing. They may actually modernise other copyright laws as well.

    Hell could it be that they at last see the same things that made me spend the last 13 years helping people overcome copyright protection mechanisms? I can honestly say I have never met anyone wanting to use my items for copyright fraud or counterfeiting in all that time when all it is are people just wanting to do what they need to do but protection systems stop them.

    An example would be people backing up their VCR collection to DVD when the VCR is now obsolete but Macrovision stops them. Or even parents wanting to make a copy of their Disney DVD for their kids use so their kids do not ruin the original but there is CGMS stopping them. All “fair use” in my opinion.

    These days there are even more options. Like I got my MP4 player running my favourite Futurama episodes. Took a while to reencode them but entertainment on the move.

    In the end I have hated the DEA for so long that it would be a hard swallow if they did make it nice.

  • Guest

    Finally, some good news at last! OFCOM has some fucking sense!

  • Pingback: El regulador británico tumba el bloqueo de webs de enlaces

  • Downwitopp

    If this continues to be a circus, just watch us all start indie films, games, etc.. and the big corprats will lose that’s my prediction.

    • Phil Culmer

      Cue legislation to outlaw indies and CC (or require them to pay licensing fees to the MAFIAA) in 3..2..1..

  • DarknezzMadnezz

    why do the rich continue to get quick trials, while the rest must wait years for some kind of legal justice? I say its time to BLOW them all away… “Governments that is” they are working too much with only the rich that only seem to line their pockets while the rest of us are left to rot with no hope in seeing the future of any kind.

    Fuck ALL Governments and Fuck any group that gets justice within a year only because they have money to push trials forward.

  • Anonymous

    pretty nice

  • Him

    just read on techdirt that the BPI are now going after ISPs in the UK to block websites it doesn’t like, using the Newzbin2 case as a precedent. basically, the government are easing back on web site blocking, but leaving it open for the entertainment industry to do it for them. that makes the government appear squeaky clean, the entertainment industry as the bad boys (as if they give a shit!), but the web site blocking goes ahead anyway!

  • AcslawareCrooks

    “As the recent MPA v BT case showed”

    When will people realise that it was not the MPA (music publishers association)
    http://www.mpaonline.org.uk/mpa_news
    But the MPAA the motion picture association of AMERICA.!. What business is of theirs what a UK based ISP should or should not block.

    GOVERNMENT of the UNITED KINGDOM of GREAT BRITAIN and NORTHERN IRELAND need to grow a pair and tell Hollywood to learn to deal with the world as it is not as they would like it to be!

  • Effra

    I WISH SOMEONE WOULD BLOCK VINCE CABLE!

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_PMIWXAPJJMOGUM4OQS5OBG2ILU Hre Sa

    Wanna find AN I-NTERRACIAL R-ELATION-SHIP???

    Here is a very nice co-mmunity

    ~~~~ Mil Cupid * C O M ~~~~

    It’s where sing-les looking for someone to enjoy their lifestyle with. Come in and stay a while. Complete your profile. Post a message, a picture of yourself and check out the photo galleries.

    Give it a try, you will find someone you like here – ;)

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_PMIWXAPJJMOGUM4OQS5OBG2ILU Hre Sa

    Wanna find AN I-NTERRACIAL R-ELATION-SHIP???

    Here is a very nice co-mmunity

    ~~~~ Mil Cupid * C O M ~~~~

    It’s where sing-les looking for someone to enjoy their lifestyle with. Come in and stay a while. Complete your profile. Post a message, a picture of yourself and check out the photo galleries.

    Give it a try, you will find someone you like here – ;)

  • Zero

    the DEA is one of those acts which went through a corrupt labor government. hushed through the media and completely destroys our rights.

    where was my local MP when this was being rushed through parliment????

    corruption at the highest levels

  • Pingback: Hollywood Forces UK ISP To Block Newzbin Usenet Site « Danno's Blog

  • http://www.zichicas.com juegos de chicas

    Really nice article, congrats

  • Pingback: Twitted by VegasMAK

  • Pingback: Reino Unido no bloqueará por ley el acceso a las webs de descargas

  • Pingback: UK Government Abandons File-Sharing Website Blocking Plans - techtime's posterous

  • Pingback: UK Government Abandons File-Sharing Website Blocking Plans | Remove spyware and malware, latest IT security news

  • Pingback: UK Government Abandons File-Sharing Website Blocking Plans | Patriot Britain

  • http://www.supershops.org wakao71
  • Him

    anyone found/produced a non-redacted version yet?

  • Him

    anyone found/produced a non-redacted version yet?

  • http://www.jerseymall.org wakao43
  • Pingback: UK Report Shows Futility Of US Anti-Piracy Law | TorrentFreak

  • Pingback: UK Report Shows Futility Of US Anti-Piracy Law

  • Pingback: Ministerio de Cultura y realidades paralelas » El Blog de Enrique Dans

  • Pingback: Ministerio de Cultura y realidades paralelas | Blog PeruW

  • Pingback: Ministerio de Cultura y realidades paralelas | La Isla Buscada

  • Pingback: Ministerio de Cultura y realidades paralelas

  • Pingback: Lib Dems to Vote on Piracy Act Repeal | TorrentFreak

  • Pingback: Is Copyright Only For the Big Guys? | TorrentFreak

  • Pingback: Is Copyright Only For the Big Guys? | We R Pirates

  • Pingback: Is Copyright Only For the Big Guys? | Links Daily

  • Pingback: P2PTalk » Is Copyright Only For the Big Guys?

  • Pingback: Is Copyright Only For the Big Guys?

  • Pingback: Is Copyright Only For the Big Guys? | p2p | DigitFreak

  • Pingback: Is Copyright Only For the Big Guys?

  • Pingback: Is Copyright Only For the Big Guys? | Torrents & File Sharing News

  • BTGuard - BitTorrent Anonymously

NewsBits

Even more news...

  • Pirate Bay Founder Gottfrid Svartholm on Freedom of Speech

    Freedom of speech is a highly valued commodity, but should people be allowed to say whatever...

  • Blu-ray Anti-Piracy Tech Stops Discs and Promotes Purchases

    An anti-piracy system present in all official Blu-ray players since 2012 has received a fresh update...

  • Foxtel Breeds Pirates by Locking Up Game of Thrones

    One of the main reasons why people turn to piracy is the lack of legal alternatives....

  • UK Student Admits Breaching Sony Copyrights With Leak of PS3 SDK

    Last year an Internet user known as El Nomeo leaked version 3.70 of Sony’s Playstation3 SDK...

  • Pirates Can Be Identified Despite Sharing IP Addresses, ISP Claims

    Carrier-Grade Network Address Translation is a network mechanism through which many Internet subscribers can share the...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

PopularArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.