TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

University of Illinois Disconnects Pirating Students, Staffer Asked To Leave

The University of Illinois is taking complaints from copyright holders very seriously by disconnecting pirating students’ Internet connections upon the first warning. After being sanctioned by a hearing officer students are allowed to come back online, but after the third strike they lose their Internet access permanently. University employees are also reprimanded, with one staffer asked to look for a new job after several alleged infringements.

illIn recent years US colleges and universities have undertaken drastic measures to reduce piracy, but it appears that some students and staffers are proving unteachable.

Every year the RIAA and MPAA send tens of thousands of infringement notices to educational institutions, who then forward these to alleged BitTorrent pirates.

How these suspected pirates are then dealt with depends on local policies but usually it involves a visit to the dean’s office and some sort of sanction.

The University of Illinois, however, is taking it a step further by punishing its students the French way.

When copyright holders send a DMCA notice informing the university about unauthorized BitTorrent downloads, the student’s dorm room is immediately cut off from the Internet.

“Students that receive infringement notices have their access to the internet shut off,” the university’s policy explains loud and clear.

“The user is informed of the requirement to meet with a hearing officer and that their access will remain shut down until such a meeting takes place. The hearing officer will meet with the student to discuss the nature of the violation and University policy regarding copyright infringement.”

The hearing officer can then apply a wide range of punitive and educational sanctions after which the student’s Internet access is eventually restored. However, after the third warning the student will never be allowed to access the Internet again in his or her dorm room, ever.

Brian Mertz, the university’s senior security outreach specialist, says that they receive up to 100 copyright infringement notices a month. This includes warnings for both students and staff.

Christine Svoboda is one of the students who was “caught” last year and it took her almost two weeks to get back online after the first warning. She still has no clue what she did wrong.

“To be completely honest with you, I have absolutely no idea what I downloaded. I have uTorrent on my computer but it was never active at school, and I didn’t use the school’s Internet to download anything like that because it was too slow,” Svoboda told The Daily Illini.

This probably doesn’t come as a complete surprise to Mertz, who noted that not all DMCA notices appear to be accurate. The security specialist said that some warnings do not match up with the activity of the IP-address on the given timestamp. However, these warnings are followed-up regardless.

Interestingly, the rigorous copyright policy also applies to staffers. In fact, Mertz explains that one employee was asked to look for another job after several warnings.

“We can’t get into specifics for HR reasons, but we had one faculty member who had repeat violations and they were actually asked to leave the University because it was such an ongoing problem,” Mertz said.

While people should abide by the rules at work and school, it goes quite far when educational institutions are used as Internet police.

The drastic measures at the University of Illinois do not stand in isolation. In 2010 the U.S. Government added a new requirement for colleges and universities to stop illicit file-sharing on their networks.

This legislation puts a defiant school at risk of losing federal funding if it doesn’t do enough to stop illicit file-sharers on its campus. In response, schools across the country have spent hundreds of thousands of dollars installing anti-file-sharing systems on their networks and updating their policies.

Thanks to the new law, the anti-piracy policies at most universities make the upcoming “six strikes” scheme look like kindergarten.

Related Posts

Previous Post | Next Post

  • cgimusic

    Wont this lead to a lot of revenge copyright accusations? If you don’t like someone very much then all you have to do is send the university a semi-official looking copyright accusation and they get disconnected from the internet.

    • Anonymous

      Indeed. A few mischievous students could get staff members fired by the dozen, or have entire classrooms of students suspended.

      • Always a Guest

        Shit! Some of those students have guns and a few might just use them if they don’t get their gore fix. There are too many shootings in America already.

        • DreeR

          That’s how they show their love in US.

    • baba

      Send a few fake notices that the dean has been downloading gay porn. See how he likes false accusations.

    • joexxx

      Of course it will.

    • Scary_Devil_Monastery

      Indeed.

      Imagine it. University students who, if they have a little tech knowledge, can get anyone, ANYONE punished, suspended, or fired if they’re feeling vindictive.

      Any admin asked to take a position on this university will laugh and walk once he hears the policy.

  • n_mailer

    This is still a big improvement over the “one strike and you’re sued” threats of the 2000s.

  • Guest321

    “In recent years US colleges and universities have undertaken drastic measures to reduce piracy, but it appears that some students and staffers are proving unteachable.”

    You can’t teach humans to go against their very nature, the inherent desire to share.

    • Gay Dean

      Universities are generally pussies when it comes to this… No spines what so ever.

      • xpmule

        you’d think leaders would lead by example..

        • Fantastic

          Universities don’t make leaders.

        • kgbmi5cia

          You’re right, they make spies.

        • Proletariat

          Aye. Perhaps the most apt example of typical bourgeoisie fuckery… pit the proletarians against one another with the promise of an extra bit of cheese for those that do their bidding.

          But it’s a bit of an empty lie, isn’t it? Will be most fulfilling to see what will happen when the used get tired of it all and lash back out against the users. Just sayin.

    • no

      Community WiFi = Torrent

    • bonnee

      …or steal.

      • Nobbee

        Stealing has nothing to do with the issue at hand, we’re talking about sharing where something culture is passed on to others, not where one person is denied access to their unique piece of property.

    • lolz

      And what is this interesting inherent desire to share you’re naming? :))

      I can for a fact say i earn around 2500 EUR a month (not that much), but i can buy all my digital goods. Have no desire to share anything digitally.

      • http://blog.ssokolow.com ssokolow

        If that’s really true, then congrats. You’re a freak of nature.

        Humans have two instinctive behaviours. For sharing property (scare things like toys and ice cream), we have to be taught.

        For sharing culture (eg. re-telling jokes, sharing gossip, singing songs with a group of friends, sharing recipes, etc.), we have a strong instinctive desire to do so and most people can’t be trained OUT of it.

        When recordings and the like become duplicable at vanishingly small costs, our instincts start classing them as “culture” rather than “property” and sharing them becomes as much of a no-brainer as telling a joke to a friend without first phoning up the comedian and arranging to pay them a royalty.

        • bobmail

          No, you have been taught to share what is yours, not what is someone elses. It’s a pro-piracy little white lie to suggest we are taught or naturally want to share other people’s things.

          Part of learning as you grow up is that you cannot take what is not yours. Otherwise, children would be walking out of the story never considering to pay for anything, because they are just sharing.

          You can also class something as “culture” without removing it from “property”. As an example, the Empire State Building is part of the culture of New York, but it is still owned property. One is not mutually exclusive of the other. Again, another anti-copyright old wives tale.

        • BuddhaFacePalmed

          Culture can’t be owned by an individual. How do you stop a joke from being retold? How do you stop a child from being Superman? Sure, the Empire State Building is property. But no one ever said that the Empire State Building is owned by this bigshot. They say the Empire State Building is part of New York,

          Children instinctively learn to share. Wanna make friends with the kid next door? Share your toys, your jokes, your imaginative adventures. No child ever said, “Sure, I’ll be your friend. But you have to pay $0.99 to go jump over lava and defeat the mighty dragon with me.”

          You are a shill, a bloated troll with no childhood. You live in a pathetic reality where apathy is the law and any “non-MAFIAA” sanctioned creativity shall be criminally charged and jailed with the highest possible penalties.

        • bobmail

          “Culture can’t be owned by an individual. How do you stop a joke from being retold?”

          You are making the mistake of confusing the common use “hey did you see that TV show last night?” compared to “here, everyone on the internet, download last night’s TV show”. The difference is simple, but profound.

          Nobody want to own your memories or your recollections, nobody want to stop you from enjoying culture.

          “Share your toys, your jokes, your imaginative adventures. No child ever said, “Sure, I’ll be your friend. But you have to pay $0.99 to go jump over lava and defeat the mighty dragon with me.”"

          No, nor do we teach kids to go steal the toys out of the neighbors house and share them to be popular.

          You are a shit, a bloated idiot with no adulthood. I am not even sure you have had a childhood, except that you do know how to whine.

        • djnforce9

          “No, nor do we teach kids to go steal the toys out of the neighbors house and share them to be popular.”

          If you take the neighbour’s toy, then they cannot use it because it’s in your possession. However, make a duplicate of that exact same toy using YOUR OWN resources, and you both can enjoy it together. How many times do you need to be told that file sharing IS NOT THEFT! You’re not TAKING anything away although your twisted logic is that everyone who hears a song automatically owes the publisher money. It’s what led to this ridiculous licensing scheme in some countries where even playing a radio in public earshot is considered a copyright offense unless you pay through the roof first.

        • Ardvaark

          This is wrong on so many levels I don’t even know where to start…

          “You are making the mistake of confusing the common use “hey did you see
          that TV show last night?” compared to “here, everyone on the internet,
          download last night’s TV show”. The difference is simple, but profound.”

          I Fail to see how discussing a show or asking if someone saw it before starting said discussion is equivalent to the concept of “Spreading a joke”, since one happens before consuming the content and the other one afterwards… Let’s just assume you misunderstood Bhudafacepalmed

          Still the two examples you gave are so different that the changes are not “simple, but profound.” one refers to discussion, the other to sharing. Two completely different things. Also you’ll find both pirates and non-pirates engage in show discussion.

          “”Share your toys, your jokes, your imaginative adventures”. No child ever said”

          Seriously? I feel for you now. As a child I would usually share my toys with my friends and vice-versa. Also sharing an amazing story/adventure you made up before was a good pastime specially if you managed to get your friends immersed in story. Imagination…

          “Sure, I’ll be your friend. But you have to pay $0.99 to go jump over lava and defeat the mighty dragon with me.”"

          Sure with that I’ll agree, no child would ever say such things as such concepts are the result of indoctrination and happen after a certain older age.

          “nor do we teach kids to go steal the toys out of the neighbours house and share them to be popular.”

          Absolutely, we don’t teach our kids to steal but I’m sure that, more than sharing, some kids would give away toys they could duplicate. I know I did gave away to my friends some toys I was offered and that I already had one like it. Very similar to the online sharing if you ask me.

          “You are a shit, a bloated idiot with no adulthood. I am not even sure
          you have had a childhood, except that you do know how to whine.”

          Now I can pretty much assume you had no childhood based on what you said before and worse than being a spineless adult, is being and adult who forgot what it is to be a child. You just lose a great deal of humanity when you forcefully forget and repress your childhood just to be an adult.

        • ScrewEwe2

          “How do you stop a child from being Superman?”

          Gravity.

        • BuddhaFacePalmed

          “Oh, gravity. Thou be a heartless bitch.” – Dr. Sheldon Cooper PhD.

        • icec0ld

          “No, you have been taught to share what is yours, not what is someone elses. It’s a pro-piracy little white lie to suggest we are taught or naturally want to share other people’s things”

          I didn’t own the playground I played at but I was still able to share it.

          “Part of learning as you grow up is that you cannot take what is not yours. Otherwise, children would be walking out of the story never considering to pay for anything, because they are just sharing.”

          Going directly to digital piracy. You are not taking anything. You are producing a copy and depriving no one of anything.

        • bobmail

          “I didn’t own the playground I played at but I was still able to share it.”

          Actually, we all own it. It’s called public property. Don’t get confused (I know it’s simple). You cannot share your neighbor’s swimming pool with your friends (without permission).

          “Going directly to digital piracy. You are not taking anything. You are producing a copy and depriving no one of anything.”

          Sigh, you have something you have no right to have. You have taken something. You may have taken a copy, but you have taken. You have deprived someone of their rights.

          As an example, if a hotel has an empty room, should you be able to sleep there for free, because you aren’t depriving anyone of anything? After all, it was just going to be empty. Or if you neighbors go on vacation, should you be able to have a party in their house? They aren’t there, so nobody is being deprived of anything – at least by your logic.

          It’s not hard to understand, unless of course you are being willfully ignorant.

        • Scary_Devil_Monastery

          “Sigh, you have something you have no right to have. You have taken something. You may have taken a copy, but you have taken. You have deprived someone of their rights.”

          No, no, and then again, no. That’s not how copyright law works. I’m surprised, bobmail, that not only do you fail to present a defense of copyright – you don’t even know how that law works.

          Instead you try to play “fill-in-the-blanks” with nothing but your personal opinion trying to overrule reality. Again.

          “As an example, if a hotel has an empty room, should you be able to sleep there for free, because you aren’t depriving anyone of anything?”

          If you could copy the empty room then you are of course free to do with it as you wish. Your example is completely irrelevant because it doesn’t have any possible comparison to file sharing.

          Honestly, is moving the goalposts and putting up straw men the only way you, Nejtillpirater, Anon, and SoundnuoS know how to argue? If so in itself that’s a very telling argument against copyright.

          Because the only way you can defend it is by lying through your teeth.

          And failing that, try to marginalize by invective.
          Not even a nice try, bobmail.

        • http://gene-poole.tumblr.com Gene Poole

          is moving the goalposts and putting up straw men the only way you, Nejtillpirater, Anon, and SoundnuoS know how to argue?

          Survey says……..?

          …yes. Yes it is.

        • Grand

          @bobmail
          Your examples of pool, empty room
          and neighbors’ house, have no relation with subject,
          you explained why in your own words.

          A playground is from the community?
          If authorities want, they could build another thing
          in there, where most people probably won’t be able
          to get access anymore, let’s say, a parking lot.
          It’s the city hall, which decides you can publicly use
          that place, it’s like your own examples,
          if your neighbors give you unlimited access
          to use their pool, their house and their business,
          then go ahead. You just contradicted yourself.

          Now, if I bought a DVD and I want to watch that
          with other 5 persons, what am I doing?
          Am I depriving the copyright holders of their rights?

          If that’s the case, movies should only be available
          on cinemas, in that way,
          everybody would pay to watch them.

        • icec0ld

          “Actually, we all own it. It’s called public property. Don’t get confused (I know it’s simple). You cannot share your neighbor’s swimming pool with your friends (without permission).”

          You said to share something you needed to own it.

          Public “ownership” isn’t ownership, dont get too confused.

          “Sigh, you have something you have no right to have. You have taken something. You may have taken a copy, but you have taken. You have deprived someone of their rights.”

          What rights? There is no right is have violated, any more than when I cook instead of eating at a fast food joint. I have produced at my menial expense a copy and depraved no one of anything.

        • Carolina

          “It’s not hard to understand, unless of course you are being willfully ignorant.”

          Oh irony !

        • http://gene-poole.tumblr.com Gene Poole

          You have deprived someone of their rights.

          despite the misnomer, copyright is not a right. It’s a restriction on others’ property rights. stop lying, your obfuscation is fooling nobody.

        • Trist

          Please, don’t share your thoughts, bobmail,
          they are not yours, you just have been indoctrinated.

        • NewWorldStoner

          Bobmail,

          Considering that each individual word you have used to write your comment with are in fact “not yours”, why are you using them?

          No one can ever “own” information, just like no one can ever “own” a word. The very idea of owning information is ludicrous obviously because if words could be owned, we would not be able to communicate without the permission of word owners and you would not be able to post your anti-freedom comments.

          Do you now see how stupid and ironic your comments are? I hope we learned something today.

        • Re jectical

          Bob stfu. You never get fed up recycling the same lame ass excuses? Get a life bob,you might actually enjoy it. You really are just a bag of hot air.

        • Ardvaark

          I can pretty much assure you that no one else other than me owns every single bit on my hard drives and as such I’m 100% allowed to do with those as I please.

          I’m also pretty much sure I’m allowed to share those bits I own with others as much as others shared their bits with me.

          Remember, It starts with one people buying a CD/DVD/Song and thus OWNING it and thinking “Wow this is awesome material I bet someone else would like this, I’ll share it!”
          No one’s sharing anything that they don’t own.

      • Bling

        @c653630013f0b836674057df528d8724:disqus
        “I can for a fact say i earn around 2500 EUR a month (not that much), but i can buy all my digital goods. Have no desire to share anything digitally”.

        That’s good news for the internet,
        you probably don’t know how to make a good rip.

    • Adam

      yep, and now lets prove how broken this system is. anyone at a uni, be sure to wire in private access points anywhere you can, offices, dorm rooms, libraries, cabling cabinets, and torrent away on a laptop around the corner. Stir the pot, cause trouble and force them to accept that an IP address does not equal a person and this is not fair.

    • joexxx

      Why would I learn something that is wrong? It’s a school, they’re supposed to teach the right things, not some garbage!
      That’s like saying – “We’re trying to teach them that 2+2=5, but some people say it’s wrong and don’t learn.”

    • http://www.facebook.com/stanford.chiu Stanford Chiu

      Most of these filters/tracking techniques are so easy to defeat:

      1. Proxy
      2. Private trackers are less/not policed
      3. MAC spoofing
      4. ARP spoofing

      the list goes on and on…

  • 0×41414141

    Anyone know the student IP ranges? this sounds like fun ;p

    • Always a Guest

      Yeah, an automated system should be put up to flood their mail with DMCA notices. It would have to transmit from many different locations, different dates and ‘styles’ to stop filtering. Then input the university I.P ranges and press go. They shouldn’t even have to put up with this. ISP’s don’t even have to do this bar in a couple of counties where it’s failing.

  • John Jester

    I wonder how long it’ll be before these students get VPNs and proxies?

    • Earthling

      I wonder if you will dare to change laws in your country,
      instead hiding behind VPNs, the rest of your life

      • ItsTheSasquatch

        Your average American citizens have no chance of changing laws written and paid for by the ultra-rich. Not without a hell of a lot of bloodshed, at least, and even then it isn’t likely.

        • Earthling

          Just see the whole human history,
          it never was easy for anybody,
          but revolutions happened.

          Now looks like in US, they just prefer to use VPNs
          and they don’t care if they’ll lose more rights,
          if the internet is affected, if webs, like Google,
          are turning in inefficient sites, if sites are closed,
          what would they do when they’re only going to be able
          to connect selected webs by those copyright groups?

          What? When the line between rich
          and poor people will be more widening
          and the middle class finally disappears?
          They can no longer brag about paying for VPNs.

          “This country (USA) protects its middle class”.

          http://articles.latimes.com/2012/sep/12/business/la-fi-census-poverty-rate-20120913

  • Anon00

    Someone needs to remind these institutions that the RIAA and MPAA are just a front for a group of companies and have no authority to demand or request any action on students.

    • http://modmyi.com/forums/iphone-4-new-skins-themes-launches/740147-neurotech-hd.html#post5637502 Jay

      Yeah, you’re right. Essentially Universities are opting in to an Internet Police scheme/ role, cannibalizing their own students (ie, customers).

      Wouldn’t that be like the police asking car dealerships to punish customers that committed crimes in cars purchased at that dealership?

      • bobmail

        No, the schools are limiting their liability by erring on the side of caution. They don’t want to lose their “innocent host / innocent service provider” status by ignoring DMCA complaints.

        They have a choice – take action, and stay legally safe, or ignore the notices and become liable themselves, with the deep pockets that the rights holders would love to take a shot at.

        • Scary_Devil_Monastery

          “No, the schools are limiting their liability by erring on the side of caution.”

          And in so doing nailing innocents, bypassing core principles of guilt, and generally generating a great deal of pro-pirate sympathy even among the students who weren’t into it to begin with.

        • http://modmyi.com/forums/iphone-4-new-skins-themes-launches/740147-neurotech-hd.html#post5637502 Jay

          If the wanted to take a shot at a University they would have done so by now, wouldn’t they?

        • Ardvaark

          Schools shouldn’t be liable in the first place. DMCA takedowns used to be sent to content hosts to remove said content, not to a school for providing internet to its students. They host no content.

          This is more similar to the HADOPI 3 strikes “law” than the DMCA. In fact it has NOTHING to do with DMCA, once again it’s the MAFIAA just bending the rules to fit their corporate interest.

  • Guest

    repression -’Merica…

  • politux

    The policy is clearly absurd and overreaching, however the quote from the student rings false to me. She claims to have never used uTorrent at school because the network was too slow. How would she know how fast she could torrent if she never tried? At least come up with a believable lie…

    • Guest

      I don’t know, maybe she could tell it would be slow to torrent things on the university network because the university network is slow?

      And using bittorent isn’t going to magially make it go faster?

      “My internet connection is 20kbps, it’s too slow to stream HD movies.”

      “HURR DURR HOW WOULD YOU KNOW THAT IF YOU NEVER TRIED IT”

      That’s your argument.

    • Just a Guest

      Err… she used her browser maybe???

    • http://www.facebook.com/edd.potts.5 Edd Potts

      She didn’t say torrenting was too slow, she said the network. You don’t need to torrent to know a network is too slow to torrent on. Maybe she tried to download a large file, e.g. a game on Steam, and found it was taking an inordinately long time, or perhaps she used a site that shows you how fast your connection is.

      • Windlasher

        Bullshit. She got caught. She should deal with it.

        • MPAA

          I like your attitude about this important issue. What’s your IP address again?

        • Windlasher

          What important issue. SHE GOT CAUGHT. She should say sorry, I wont do it again, and get on with life. And then be more careful next time. I bet you argue with the cops who clearly tagged you at 80 in a 60. Pay the fucking ticket and slow down.

        • Windblown

          Actually pay the ticket and get a fuzzbuster, errrr vpn.

        • Windlasher

          That I agree with.

        • xpmule

          you ever visited one of those sites that show you what you have downloaded on torrents ? If so you would see how inaccurate the info out there is.

        • Wallace

          SHE DIDN’T GET CAUGHT. What part of that is confusing to you? it’s bogus accusation against someone who knows full well what torrenting is because she does it off campus.

          “I bet you argue with the cops who clearly tagged you at 80 in a 60.”

          Windlasher logic: I have sped somewhere; therefore, all speeding tickets I get are legit.

          I absolutely argue with cops who tag me at 80 in a 60 if I feel I have a case, and when I do, I get out of it. Having sped on another road does not factor into it.

        • Windlasher

          Thats thievery logic. I did it but you cant prove it, or you didn’t see me do it so I will lie my way out of it, or yes, i had sex with her but it didn’t mean a thing and I thought of you the whole time. Have fun with that.

        • Wormlore

          That’s not “thievery logic”. That’s the fundamental logic of our countries’ judiciary systems. US, Canada, Europe… You need proof to have someone judged guilty. And you can’t have someone judged guilty on unrelated proofs: if you can only prove he once stole a car, it’s useless to sue him for having stolen a truck.

          Note that it obviously doesn’t mean the accused one is always innocent. Your so-called “thievery logic” was supposed to be our general rule of Law because it protects more innocent people than guilty ones.

          But that’s in courtrooms. MPAA/RIAA have lots of power, and they exercise it mostly out of actual trials, in a world where “might makes right” is more relevant than proofs, due process and proportional response.

        • ScrewEwe2

          One thing to consider is that in the US, Canada, Europe, you can’t have any pudding if you don’t eat you meat. Fact!

        • Of course not

          How can you have any pudding if you don’t eat your meat?

        • Wallace

          “I didn’t do it” is thievery logic?

          “I didn’t do it” means “I did it but you didn’t see me do it”?

          “I didn’t have sex with her” means “I had sex with her”?

          I’m not having fun yet.

        • http://thepiratebay.se/user/SCSA420 StoneCold420

          my ip is 1.800.Eat.Shit.

        • Techanon

          “she”? You don’t mean “the room’s IP address”?

        • Windlasher

          OK, Yeah, But she obviously knew what it was and how to use it. It was probably her. Did you read the article?

          “To be completely honest with you, I have absolutely no idea what I downloaded. I have uTorrent on my computer but it was never active at school, and I didn’t use the school’s Internet to download anything like that because it was too slow,”

          I tried it and it was too slow. Probably because they are throttling “torrents”. Show she knew. “tried to torrent but it was too slow”. MAYBE she got nailed during that ONE time she left it run for an hour and realized that they were throttling it. Oh, well. she got caught.

          People who don’t know what torrenting is, when questioned say “whats a torrent?. She’s a stupid BINT.

        • Windbreaker

          “Oh, well. she got caught.”

          Either that or she didn’t. Good point. It must be one of those two.

          She clearly stated she knew what a torrent was. That’s how she knew the accusation was false.

        • MPAA

          What’s this? You know what a torrent is Windslasher? You must be stealing from us then. Please contact our lawyers and admit to stealing from us. We promise to go easy on you.

        • Guest

          @Faillasher

          She never said she tried filesharing on the university network and there’s no proof that she did.

          You’re completely fucking making it up.

          Inventing fake facts is not how debate works, mmkay?

        • Windlasher

          And you are trying to justify theft. Her connection, her responsibility. If it was traced to her IP then its her issue.

          And by the way, I am not against torrenting. I just said she sounded like an idiot.

          Yes, officer. I did come into the bank with a gun and the intent to rob it, but there were too many security guards. DUH!

        • Anyone

          you mean like the connection that is now “stolen” from her?
          that is much more “theft” than sharing files is, because someone is actually missing something

        • Windlasher

          She got her connection back, so she is missing nothing. My point is, the record companies are missing nothing much, but something. If you came into my store and stole one of my products, I would call the police, even though that product only cost me $1 to make. I sell them for $5, but even though it cost me $1 to make, it’s mine, I made it and if you want it, you have to pay me for it. You don’t get to steal it because you disagree with the price.

        • BuddhaFacePalmed

          Really? That “Piracy steals a fictional tangible object from a fictional store that I own argument?”

          Well, I can say this MAFIAA provides a shitty service. MAFIAA did not release this product in this part of the world. A stranger is kind enough to share with us with no charge, no hassle while keeping his own copy. MAFIAA cries foul because they haven’t thought of it or couldn’t be bothered to do it in the first place.

          It’s competition. Plain and simple. If Pirates can provide a better service than the vendors themselves, is it any wonder why people go to pirates first?

        • Windlasher

          WTF. Competition..? Thats such bullshit. Stranger Sharing his own copy? Even More Bullshit. If all the people sharing a torrent was sharing their own copy, everyone would have a copy already and thus NO Need to torrent. Oh, well. live well in your delusion.

        • BuddhaFacePalmed

          A. I did not say MAFIAA only provides shitty music and films. I said MAFIAA provides shitty service. What use do I buy a Blu-Ray from overseas when that Blu-Ray is region-locked in my area and is prevented from playing.

          B. Everyone sharing a torrent is definitely sharing their own copy. What you fail to realize is that there are OTHER people who haven’t consume the media. So, they look up the BitTorrent sites and then torrent what they’re interested in. Like a open public library.

          C. AND BY THE WAY: How do you know if the music and movies are shit if you haven’t judge it for yourself? for example, Battleship was the shittiest movie of last year, but I wouldn’t know it because of all the hype and marketing surrounding it. If I had paid to watch it in the cinema, I would be treated to a below-par product for 2 hours. I can’t get my money back because I paid for it. Unlike physical objects, whereas if the supermarket sold me spoiled milk, I’m allowed to demand for a refund and potentially sue that particular supermarket for selling me spoiled milk.

        • Wallace

          “Sharing his own copy? Even More Bullshit. If all the people sharing a torrent was sharing their own copy, everyone would have a copy already and thus NO Need to torrent.”

          OK, I admit that was funny. I do admire someone coming onto a site called TorrentFreak and saying something like this. It’s like going to a horse farm and demanding to know who sawed all the horns off the unicorns.

        • Wallace

          “My point is … If you came into my store and stole one of my products, I
          would call the police”

          False.

          Your point is that you’d call the police on someone who was innocent because you had a shoplifiting problem in general.

          In your scenario, YOU’RE the criminal.

          Your “I’m just another shill” nonsense doesn’t fool anyone. The MPAA and RIAA want to punish the guilty and only scare the innocent.

        • It can not be stealing

          ” If you came into my store and stole one of my products, I would call the police, even though that product only cost me $1 to make. I sell them for $5, but even though it cost me $1 to make, it’s mine, I
          made it and if you want it, you have to pay me for it. You don’t get to
          steal it because you disagree with the price.

          What if it cost you nothing to make … and you didn’t make it?

          You wouldn’t be missing anything either. You wouldn’t have been missing something for any amount of time. You would just be calling the police about an item someone made – at no cost to you – and claiming that they stole it from you.

          “No officer, he never entered my store. No, I still have everything I had before he stole it. Yes, he made it himself.” “But it’s just like the ones I try to sell.”

        • Guest321

          Your analogy is way off as usual. File sharing is akin to going to your store, taking a looking at your product and then making a duplicate copy for myself at my own cost. Either way you don’t have my money and yet I have your product and I didn’t steal anything.

        • Windlasher

          You are not making a duplicate with your own resources. You are not going out hiring the people and resources to make it. You are stealing. Deal with it.

        • ScrewEwe2

          Your prices are too high. I’m not shopping at your store.

        • Wallace

          “And you are trying to justify theft. Her connection, her responsibility. If it was traced to her IP then its her issue.”

          I thought you said she did it, and the fact that she knew what a torrent was proved she did it?

          Now you’re saying she didn’t do it but is still responsible?

          The MPAA and RIAA do not need friends like you, and don’t pretend that saying “theft” puts you on their side. They want to make not pirating seem right and simple. You want to make not pirating seem impossible and irrelevant, since the accusations will come and be true whether the person has done it or not.

        • Scary_Devil_Monastery

          “OK, Yeah, But she obviously knew what it was and how to use it. It was probably her. “

          Oh, that will fly in a court of law.

          And the rest of your rant is full of wild guesses at the end of which you summarily call her a “stupid bint”.

          Funny. In my own personal opinion you seem to be an utterly useless inhuman sack of rancid shit without either a clue on how ip-adressed accusations usually fail to work, on the barest basics of the burden of proof or the law, and without even the common decency to not go around calling people you know nothing of “stupid bints”. Probably because you’re embarrassed at having made such an ass of yourself.

          But that’s only my personal opinion and at least i have the balls to own up to it not necessarily being fact.

          Since you want to play guessing games, here’s my own equally likely scenario. The girl turned down some guy of your approximate caliber and he framed her in revenge, knowing how laughably easy and hard to prove the botch job would be.

        • xpmule

          she doesn’t have any choice.. she was fingered by unreputable group and convicted and sentenced to punishment and afterwards she has the option of a trial of sorts..

        • ScrewEwe2

          She got fingered by an unreputable group? Sounds like gang rape to me.

    • Techanon

      Didn’t it occur to you that her dorm’s conection was _generaly_ slow, even for normal browsing, nevermind for torrenting?

    • Anon

      Have you tried torrenting with a 28.8kbps dial-up modem?

      You never know until you try. Maybe it will work!!1!

      • icec0ld

        I sure did. It was embarrassing how long I was on dial up

  • asdf

    Universities are responsible what their staff and students due. If they allow torrents they can be liable for massive lawsuits. They aren’t doing it to piss off students, they are doing it to prevent getting sued to ground.

    • 465756

      chut up no one cares about ur stupid opinion

      • http://www.facebook.com/edd.potts.5 Edd Potts

        Wow. Great rebuttal.

        • 8675309

          Wow. Great rebuttal.

        • ScrewEwe2

          Wow. Great rebuttal.

    • MPAA

      Because our profit is far more important than education.

      • JG

        My understanding is they’re just being cut off in their rooms. They should still be able to go to any of the computer labs on campus & log into the network. Which means more likely they’ll be using a computer they don’t have admin access to, thus they’ll be unable to install new software (so no P2P or torrent applications)…. (*yes, they could use their own laptop on wifi, but at my alma mater at least they’ve blocked all p2p/torrent access over wifi). So they can still do research etc… They just won’t be able to do it from the comfort of their own room….

        • Anon

          Pretty sure he was talking about how the feds will cut funding if the Universities don’t agree to be internet police.

          I wonder what would happen if a large University held their ground, what kind of public outrage would happen if they lost their funding and 1000′s of students lost some quality of education. Would the public get angry with the feds or the University?…

        • Im A Wrongun

          I’m pretty sure that the public outrage would be directed towards the administrators of the university, for not following what the public would see as simple steps to stop piracy, resulting in these administrators losing their positions and probably careers.

          Rightly or wrongly (and beleive me, my terrabytes of freely consmed media put me firmly in the wrong camp ;) ), these universities are caught between a rock and a hard place. While they are clearly going about this in the wrong way, they have to be seen to be doing something.

        • Scary_Devil_Monastery

          “…they have to be seen to be doing something.”

          But we aren’t exactly talking about a gathering of village idiots here. These people should have been the first to see that no matter how much they abused their student body, the *IAA’s will try to extort money from them given any chance at all.

          Honestly, any university going smart would instead sign on with a foreign VPN, channel all their traffic through that, and point to the integrity of the students for a reason.

          There’s actually a pretty good argument for this as well, as students with dissenting political views, opinions not popular by many, and/or the “wrong” type of sexual orientation or religion do have a pressing need for anonymization.

          Instead they opted for the alternative which is not only more expensive but runs a very very high risk of unjustly penalizing innocent people.

        • Techanon

          µTorrent Portable in an external HDD makes admin access unnecessary.

        • guest

          So do torrent smartphone apps.

      • http://thepiratebay.se/user/SCSA420 StoneCold420

        Freedom of Information is more important then your chump change profits MPAA faggots because Freedom of Information through file sharing is more important then you rich faggots buying another mansion or expensive car

    • xpmule

      no i don’t buy this.. under other conditions they are NOT held responsible for anything. If a student gets in trouble for hacking a web site does the University get charged ? no of course not.. If a pedophile gets arrested for child porn does the University get in trouble ? no of course not. Universities ARE responsible for protecting students from harassment.. such as illegal and malicious extortion schemes.

      • Nearly True

        Absolutely correct. However, if 25% of the university were hacking or downloading kiddie porn then questions would definately get asked of the university don’t you think?

        • Scary_Devil_Monastery

          Certainly, and the University would, if hacking and/or CP was involved, invite the police to do an investigation.

          Any other questions should be met with the honest “We are not a police force, nor do we interfere with our student’s right to communicate”.

          On my own Alma mater if the faculty tried implementing procedures such as this, the faculty would simply go without internet themselves until they caved.

    • n_mailer

      You’ve never been to college. Universities do plenty of things to piss off students. They treat their customers like human ATMs and kick them when they don’t “work.” This is a minor example of that.

  • Zebra52

    Ah…….my old undergraduate alma mater. This bastion of liberalism pronounces the students guilty as charged with no trial! Off with their heads!

  • Guest

    And so corporate America’s purchase of the education system is complete.

    • Goodbyenoway

      It’s the government’s purchase of academia that’s the problem, not corporate.

    • markh

      Why do you think I moved to Europe to study

  • dondilly

    Isnt it about time universities woke up to the fact many trackers are designed to give out a % of fake IPs either randomly generated or from a list. Real torrent clients try the fake addresses and after no meaningful response will discard them while the copyright stasi faithfully record them as valid.

    This is a common means of misidentification. Ask your nearest networked laser printer.

    • Windlasher

      so wat you are saying is that none of the students there were pirating?

      • MPAA

        Some were, some weren’t. We don’t know the difference and we don’t care. If they say they didn’t do it then all they have to do is prove it to us.

        • http://thepiratebay.se/user/SCSA420 StoneCold420

          Actually why don’t you MPAA shitheads prove your case beyond a shadow of a doubt or just give the hell up because you faggots will NEVER STOP FILE SHARING YOU STUPID MF’ers!!!

        • Duh…

          You know that account isn’t the real MPAA?

      • dondilly

        No one is saying NONE of the students were sharing. What i am pointing out is that the evidence is completely unreliable. 3 or 6 strikes on a uni campus does not strengthen a case against a student as many trackers use a list of fakes so the same IPs will appear again and again and most campuses do not utilize ISP grade logging , misguidedly use static IPs thinking it will add traceability and accountability.

    • bobmail

      You don’t think that part of their process is to actually download parts of the file from various people? Don’t you think they confirm who actually provided parts of the file? Do you think they are just pulling a list and not checking?

      The networked laser printer thing is done mostly by hooking a laptop into place of the laser printer after hours, and using it to download, and then plugging the printer back in the next morning – or for that matter just forcibly taking the IP, turning the printer off for the night, and then releasing it back in the morning and turning the printer back on.

      • Scary_Devil_Monastery

        “The networked laser printer thing is done mostly by hooking a laptop into place of the laser printer after hours, and using it to download, and then plugging the printer back in the next morning – or for that matter just forcibly taking the IP, turning the printer off for the night, and then releasing it back in the morning and turning the printer back “

        Um, nope.

        And we’ve told you a few times now to stop making guesses about how things happen when you don’t know the tech involved.

        http://dmca.cs.washington.edu/dmca_hotsec08.pdf

        In short, any attempts to trace IP adress in filesharing are inherently flawed, providing an average of 12-13% error margin, even when care is taken to collate the result.

        So stop trying to explain how the ip adress traced is, in fact, the proper one. Odds are good it’s not.

      • Ardvaark

        It appears your computer illiteracy is showing again.

        Please refrain from assuming things you don’t know.

        First learn about the NAT protocol, it’s a very nice thing but in effect it ensures that, to the outside MAFIAA “IP Hunter”, an IP can only identify the origin of the request up to a certain node. Beyond that it’s pure guess work.

        Now you could still have a pretty nice chance of guessing if it were a small network were it not for the fact that beyond said node, the topology of the network CAN change. That’s DHCP to you.

        Then there’s basic people who can’t comprehend that IP != person and assume that whatever shows up on the tracker (also note, you can show up on the tracker without downloading and uploading a single bit), is indeed a pirate. That’s wrong as it can be a network printer, a router, switch, or any other thing on the network, and also because sometimes they don’t even check the freakin file being downloaded.

        The more you know. Now crawl back to your hole.

      • http://gene-poole.tumblr.com Gene Poole

        there you go, pretending you know anything about technology again. Why don’t you leave the explanations for someone who actually (i> can find their ass with both hands and a map?

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Gear-Mentation/100003097514663 Gear Mentation

    Do they make it impossible to use a VPN inside the college network? If not, this shows why the “strikes” system will be effective.

  • nightflier

    Dictating bastards

  • Goodbyenoway

    It’s no surprise that the far left wing world of US universities would behave in this manner especially state schools. They believe in the absolute power of the state and in complete government control of people’s lives. This surprises anyone?

  • anon

    get a cheap computer, plug it into a wall jack in a computer lab and download all you want. they’ll know what the IP is, but not whos computer it is, then remote to it and download. (basically an on campus seedbox / vpn)

    • xpmule

      read the story.. staff are being fired over this. so the guy in charge of that class / room / computers etc would get fired.

  • OneEyedWillie

    God just when I think these copyright people can’t possibly get any dumber, I am schooled. If any group is going to create an epic protest or create a riot or mob scene it would be college students. MPAA + RIAA keep pissing everyone off and law simply will not matter anymore, violence will. As you oppress people enough and ruin enough lives, people will fight back and not the legal way!

    • xpmule

      yeah they are in the perfect position to raise awareness and maybe do some demonstrations / rallying etc

  • Ray Carroll

    That sounds about right from the US Government corporate lobbyists. “We’re going to stop educating our students if they don’t stop downloading. The Country is ran by Comcast, Disney, Warner Bros…etc..Ridiculous stupidity to cut funding to a college because of file-sharing. All these crazy people with guns are going after the wrong people.

    • JordanKratz

      Maybe soon we will all be getting our Wish.
      The Death of some RIAA/MPAA Greedsters.

    • John

      thats b/c it was doctor and govt sponsored gun events (see davidicke . com / forum and todays news bulletin

  • Member2010

    It’s so ridiculous that they make such a big deal about filesharing. It’s as much of a nonissue as the global warming crap they keep going on about.

    • Anon

      Global warming is a theft.

      Warm people are breaking the law and will be punished.

    • xpmule

      ya or Penstate.. they will spend vast amounts of effort covering up their pedo coaches after molesting students but god forbidden if someone downloaded a movie or something..

  • AdviceMan

    if you are going to download from a university use a vpn. Dont be stupid.

    • xpmule

      you don’t have to be stupid to be harassed for file sharing related activity.. besides the VPN get out of jail free card will not work forever. I know there is no way i am going to pay someone money to simulate my personal rights and hide from “them” ..if they want a fight i will knock em the fuck out if they come after me ..bring it on copyright trolls ..i will own your ass’s hard !

      • AdviceMan

        you do know there are free vpn service. I wont name any names but you can find them very easily.

      • http://gene-poole.tumblr.com Gene Poole

        Is this a litigious argument, or more of a “4th box” sort of statement?

    • Scary_Devil_Monastery

      Unfortunately it doesn’t matter – most university nets aren’t what you’d call “secure” to begin with.

      If your ip addy has been online at all then odds are good you will be fingered whether you downloaded or did not download through or without a VPN.

  • http://echavez74.myopenid.com/ CiEZ

    p3n1sh3ads!

  • JG

    My Alma Mater has a similar policy. Except, if I’m not mistaken, rather than waiting to get a complaint, they nix you if they catch torrent like activity. It was more to reclaim resources so those of us who were using the network for legit reasons could have the bandwidth, etc. They really started to enforce it my last couple years on campus after the network had been slowed down. I think they said something like 40 students (of ~3,500 on campus residents) were eating up 70% of the bandwidth….

    The last year there, I was working as a Residence Director through the Housing Dept. I happened to be in the hall’s office when one of our residents stopped down to complain her internet had stopped working while she was at class… I was helping her troubleshoot some basic common issues, and we couldn’t figure it out. I was getting the IT number so they could help her when she mentioned her roommate’s connection had also suddenly started back up, despite being offlined for torrenting… Sure enough, while she was at class, her roommate switched cords with her, so she was plugged into the disabled port & the roommate had the active port….

    Best part… Near the end of the year, she stops down again complaining her net had been disconnected…. “Do you think my roommate might have switched cords again?” she asked….. And yes, she did….

    • http://modmyi.com/forums/iphone-4-new-skins-themes-launches/740147-neurotech-hd.html#post5637502 Jay

      Aw, that burns me up just reading it.

  • Robert Scott Lawrence

    It never ceases to amaze that educational institutions remain the most totalitarian of regimes while espousing freedom of expression. Perhaps the university should check to see if infringement actually occurred before sanctioning its students based on mass DMCA notice sent out by the RIAA and MPAA, particularly given their track record of sending notices to (a) people without internet access, (b) the dead, (c) pre-teens, (d) anyone who owns an unsecured router. Not to mention their peculiar habit of sending notices to people whose downloaded content is non-infringing.

  • Guest

    Man this is yet another great example of why the US government’s ridiculous “war on information” is so harmful in the most unexpdected of ways.
    Putting it into perspective, the RIAA and the MPAA lobby enough, they make the government pass a law that forces colleges to establish programs that will cut off internet from students to reduce “file sharing”.

    A, the are denying their studends the itnernet,a human right and the most usefull tool for education and culture.

    and B, those programs must cost some money, which will indirectly inflate the costs of education as well in a country where education is already super expensive.

    No wonder many americans consider not going to college if things are so bad over there.
    MAFIAA screwing yet another good thing.

  • PiRat

    Illinois is a shit hole any ways.

  • amikot0

    My school, Florida Tech, does the same shit. I also work tech support so if I were to get caught, I’d lose my job. Arigato Kami-sama for Torguard and other VPN’s

  • letsblowuphollywoodlol

    Christine Svoboda huh? Svoboda means freedom in Russian. What an appropriate name she has,

    Permanent disconnections after a few unproven accusations, cuts to funding? Fucking barbaric. Lets blow up hollywood already and be done with this crap.

    • ScrewEwe2

      What does “bobmail” mean in Яussian?

      • bobmail

        It means “the idiot asking is a child”.

        • ScrewEwe2

          bobmail means “the idiot asking is a child”? You should consider changing your name then Bob. You don’t want people thinking you’re an “idiotic child” do you Bob?

      • Scary_Devil_Monastery

        Not sure what it means in russian, but in the rest of the world, “bobmail” is a general name of mailinator services.

        In short, he’s chosen a nick which implies “this nick is a fake”. Deliciously ironic if he was unaware of it.

  • http://modmyi.com/forums/iphone-4-new-skins-themes-launches/740147-neurotech-hd.html#post5637502 Jay

    Fuckin’ Hell. I don’t think I could have made it through college without pirating shit. Everything is so expensive there’s no way you can go to school and afford all the software you’ll NEED to pass your classes.

  • cupid_stunt

    in the UK we have been using this universities ip to get pandora, which thanks to them works slowly, but consistently. i would like to take this opportunity to thank them and have a special request, frank zappa track from sheik yerbouti called yo mama

  • dqdfx

    in other words, UofI is signaling that nobody should go there, especially if they want anything involving technology. What’s more telling is that the school is known to have a crap network. Universities having a great network *is* a reason to want to be there, in comparison.

  • VenkRonk

    Aye aye aye, you got to be kidding me! How absurd is that?

    irAnon.tk

  • JordanKratz

    There are other Universities to go to young folk.Find a different one and that way Uof I will get nothing from your wallet.

  • icec0ld

    Fucking what?

    Infringement accusations cause a man to lose his job? The fucking fuck? In this economy it’s god damned death sentence.

  • Printer University of Illinois

    Imagine this;

    “Dean of the University of Illinois : Okay Mister Laser Printer you did a good job for our University but it came to my understanding that you used the University network to download torrents so I am afraid to inform you we will be firing you”

    This is the future my friends better hell embrace it

  • WentToUofI

    Two word: torrent encryption

  • Kiesha

    “The University of Illinois is taking complaints from copyright holders
    very seriously by disconnecting pirating students’ Internet connections
    upon the first warning. After being sanctioned by a hearing officer
    students are allowed to come back online, but after the third strike
    they lose their Internet access permanently”

    We are a college for profit and do not keep up with whats going on around us. We do not even take the time to read torrentfreak daily to see what has been going on around us with the pay up or else schemes or fake dmca etc. We know we are greedy bastards who act like we are a university but really we are just in it for the money, same as mafiaa and pay up or else schemes. Rather than dismissing the more than likely fraudelent claims when there is no evidence permitted, we would rather have no backbone and not do our job while supposably teaching the future of America. In other words, do not expect a honest and decent college from us as we do not do our research when grading others for their work (students). Thank you for choosing Iniversity Of Illinoise, home of the college that fails to do its job, we hope you enjoy your stay.

    A question I do have though is why not just get another provider? When I was on several other campuses, there were way better services avalable provided I call up the local internet companies around.

  • Kiesha

    ok lots here so :

    “To be completely honest with you, I have absolutely no idea what I downloaded. I have uTorrent on my computer but it was never active at school, and I didn’t use the school’s Internet to download anything like that because it was too slow,” Svoboda told The Daily Illini.

    sorry but the “to be completely honest” part is ususally from a sly fox.(crooked person) if they have to tell you first (believe me) like you would not have first, second maybe the pc was restarted? and also about the schools internet too slow, most universities usually have at least a 10mb and that was back in 2003 so now probably way more than that so I guess you have 20mb + somewhere else to use?

    “This probably doesn’t come as a complete surprise to Mertz, who noted that not all DMCA notices appear to be accurate. The security specialist said that some warnings do not match up with the activity of the IP-address on the given timestamp. However, these warnings are followed-up regardless.”

    we poke the innocent person also, just because we can (basically says)

    ” In 2010 the U.S. Government added a new requirement for colleges and universities to stop illicit file-sharing on their networks.”:

    Have you seen the state of the government and educational institutions? Lets see, us bankrupt, college largest price in history, guaranteed no good paying job when leave, etc and you …

    “This legislation puts a defiant school at risk of losing federal funding if it doesn’t do enough to stop illicit file-sharers on its campus. In response, schools across the country have spent hundreds of thousands of dollars installing anti-file-sharing systems on their networks and updating their policies. ”

    blackmail, how to stop filesharing the right way 1) posters protesting mafiaa, 2) ways to protect yourself from them (use another provider other than colleges, vpn, air card, etc) 3) money saved as posters and handouts and some flyers do not cost that much, 4) bittorrent blocking softwear (just ask us govt what kind of traffic they do not want and block that one , but then if bittorrent traffic they can go to court and fight it out and be found they have to be net neutral and not block etc so the whole thing is a sham…

    forgot update policies (ex us govt wants bittorrent proticol blocked, so download via one click host, emule, freenet, tor, etc)

    the money we saved from what we though we were gong to spend on updating our stuff was way less, so we would like to donate it to fighting human trafficking.

  • Kiesha

    ok lots here so :

    “To be completely honest with you, I have absolutely no idea what I downloaded. I have uTorrent on my computer but it was never active at school, and I didn’t use the school’s Internet to download anything like that because it was too slow,” Svoboda told The Daily Illini.

    sorry but the “to be completely honest” part is ususally from a sly fox.(crooked person) if they have to tell you first (believe me) like you would not have first, second maybe the pc was restarted? and also about the schools internet too slow, most universities usually have at least a 10mb and that was back in 2003 so now probably way more than that so I guess you have 20mb + somewhere else to use?

    “This probably doesn’t come as a complete surprise to Mertz, who noted that not all DMCA notices appear to be accurate. The security specialist said that some warnings do not match up with the activity of the IP-address on the given timestamp. However, these warnings are followed-up regardless.”

    we poke the innocent person also, just because we can (basically says)

    ” In 2010 the U.S. Government added a new requirement for colleges and universities to stop illicit file-sharing on their networks.”:

    Have you seen the state of the government and educational institutions? Lets see, us bankrupt, college largest price in history, guaranteed no good paying job when leave, etc and you …

    “This legislation puts a defiant school at risk of losing federal funding if it doesn’t do enough to stop illicit file-sharers on its campus. In response, schools across the country have spent hundreds of thousands of dollars installing anti-file-sharing systems on their networks and updating their policies. ”

    blackmail, how to stop filesharing the right way 1) posters protesting mafiaa, 2) ways to protect yourself from them (use another provider other than colleges, vpn, air card, etc) 3) money saved as posters and handouts and some flyers do not cost that much, 4) bittorrent blocking softwear (just ask us govt what kind of traffic they do not want and block that one , but then if bittorrent traffic they can go to court and fight it out and be found they have to be net neutral and not block etc so the whole thing is a sham…

    forgot update policies (ex us govt wants bittorrent proticol blocked, so download via one click host, emule, freenet, tor, etc)

    the money we saved from what we though we were gong to spend on updating our stuff was way less, so we would like to donate it to fighting human trafficking.

  • Who

    I don’t understand Y….schools are exempt from copyright law. it says so in the US copyright act. FUCKING MPAA/RIAA

  • Fred

    At the university I attend and work at, there are many computer labs that students and staff have access to where the log in is just; User “lab” password “lab”. After hours anyone with a valid school ID can sneak in. Security doesn’t care about them and neither does night staff. So basically you have to be pretty stupid to get caught.

  • http://twitter.com/JerkfaceMcGee Jerkface McGee

    Hello future VPN purchasers!

    I’d like to give a special thank you to our bureaucrats at the MAFIAA and the United States government, as well as special other collaborators in the shadows, for popularizing a emerging market/industry.

  • JUDGE

    WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS BULLSHIT!!!!!!!!!!!! WHY ARE THEY INVADING OUR FUCKING LIVES?!! LEAVE PEOPLE THE FUCK ALONE. AREN’T YOU WORRIED THAT SOMEONE IS GOING TO SNAP ONE DAY AND RETALIATE AGAINST THESE FUCKING SNOOPING RATS!!!???? and then they wonder why bullies choose to not take it anymore and fight back, sometimes violently (ie columbine).

    • JUDGE

      *i meant the bullied, not the bullies

  • ItsTheSasquatch

    My university sends out a notice to all new students about their copyright policy. They even have the nerve to link directly to the RIAA’s website as “further reading” on copyright law. I’ve talked to the school’s network admin about it, and yeah, it’s because the university is afraid of the MaFIAA. The pieces of **** are actually bullying public universities into spreading their propaganda for them. This needs to stop.

  • frozar

    Unis been doing this for years.

  • joexxx

    I’d sue the school for defamation and other damages.

  • Logan B

    A wall is being built around the world. A wall you cannot see, but has been built before. Like previous walls, this wall is being built against the majority by the few. Unlike previous walls being built from stone and mortar, this one is being built by money. This wall is not like the Great Wall. This wall is more like the Berlin Wall. Those that come near, disappear, yet those that do not, also disappear. This is not freedom. Think about it.

  • Scary_Devil_Monastery

    Hrm. They might want to TRY that at my old Alma Mater. First thing that would happen if the principal announced a similar policy would be that the entire faculty would be offline until they caved.

    And I suspect it’s the same on every other university which has IT classes in it’s curriculum and a highly active slew of computer clubs.

    • ItsTheSasquatch

      The MaFIAA’s terror tactics have been partially effective–even state universities are cowering in terror of being the next victim. On the other hand, it’s also bred extreme resentment. The network admin at my school, for instance, doesn’t even pretend to support the policy–he openly admits it’s a fear-based decision by the university’s leadership.

  • Fight Illegal Immigration

    Illinois has become one of the absolute WORST states in the U.S.A. There is high unemployment and high crime. Chicago is a crime zone. It has the highest murder rate of any U.S. city. The cause of this is largely from ILLEGAL LATINOS which the governor and congress have allowed to reside in the state without upholding immigration law. Make no mistake about it, Illinois is an amnesty state for illegal immigrants just like California. The mayor of Chicago, Rahm Emanuel (aka Obama boot licker) is a communist and behind the push to shred the Constitution, especially the Second Amendment. Now, we read in the news that Illinois is going to allow drivers licenses for all their illegal immigrants. So instead of upholding and enforcing immigration laws, the state of Illinois, like California, will bend over to accommodate people ILLEGALLY in this country. Illinois is also responsible for allowing illegals to vote!

    Why the HELL should American citizens accommodate illegal immigrants through welfare and the Spanish language (because most of them don’t care to learn English)? Why should American companies sell their products with Spanish text on them? Why should call centers in the U.S give priority to Spanish speakers? Why should any of them have a job when American citizens struggle to find work?

    STOP ACCOMMODATING THESE PEOPLE.

    Why should any U.S. citizen be inconvenienced by them at all? They should be arrested and deported.

    Illegal immigrants cost the American taxpayer around 113 BILLION dollars a year. These costs come from welfare, schooling, healthcare, committing crimes (especially fraud), etc. Most of the identity theft that occurs in the U.S. is committed by illegals. They are responsible for the explosion of crime rates all over the country. Illegals around the country attempt to remove Blacks and Asians from neighborhoods through violence and intimidation (using the “n” word, etc.). Compton, California, with a population of about 97,000, was predominately Black for many years. It is now 65% Latino, according to the 2010 U.S. Census. The city is now only 32.9% Black. This demographic shift was caused by Latino thugs and gangs taking over the neighborhoods through violence and intimidation against Blacks.

    The issue of racism in the U.S. is no longer a White/Black issue. The problem of racism in the U.S. comes from illegal Latinos against all other races, but this racism is particularly targeted against Blacks and Asians.

    The following list presents the totality of the true cost and burden of having illegals in this country:

    Anchor Babies: Birthright Citizenship Exploited
    Anti-American Attitudes
    Anti-Semitic Attitudes
    Anti-Black Attitudes
    Anti-White Attitudes
    Anti-Asian Attitudes
    Attacks on Border Patrol and Law Enforcement agents
    Attacks on Free Speech in America
    Animal Abuse Increases
    Census Numbers: Negative Impact on Congressional Representation
    Civil rights: Devalued by comparison to illegal actions
    Child Endangerment
    Child Molestation
    Closed and Overcrowded Hospitals and Emergency Rooms
    Cost of Translators
    Consulates issuing Matricular Cards (ID Mexico won’t even accept)
    Day Laborers loitering and creating public hazards
    Depreciated Wages for Americans and Legal Immigrants
    Deterioration of Common American Culture
    Desecration of the American Flag: Foreign Flags used aggressively
    Disrespect for American Laws
    Document Fraud
    Drunk driving injuries and deaths: Hit and Runs
    Ethnic Cleansing and Race Riots
    Farm animals within city limits
    Foreign Influence on US Politics
    Gangs, Graffiti, Drugs, Cartels, Smugglers, and Violence
    Gang Rape and unreported rapes
    High Birth Rates and Overpopulation
    Human Sex Slavery
    Identity Theft
    Increased Crime
    Increased Taxes for Americans
    Increased pressures on infrastructure (roads, traffic, water, sewer)
    Infectious Diseases
    Lost American Jobs
    Lost American Sovereignty
    Lost Self Governance of American citizens Vs. Globalism and Elitism
    Male Chauvinism: Gender inequality
    Not Speaking English, loss of common language, Press 1 for English
    Overcrowded Schools and Negative Impact on American Education
    Overcrowded single family homes
    Overcrowded Jails and Prisons
    Public Sanitation Loss: Trash and human waste in towns
    Racist Groups (La Raza) and Race Based Politics
    Remittances: Billions of dollars sent out of the US Economy
    Rule of Law: Fundamental principles of America sacrificed.
    Separatist Movements: Demands for autonomy
    Smear Campaigns and Lies: Dirty Politics
    Stolen American Taxpayer Resources: Tuition, Welfare, Licenses
    Taking limited seats in colleges at taxpayer expense
    Tax payer funds going to special interest groups (example) “La Raza”
    Terrorism Threats and Loss of national security
    Trash and Negative Impact on Environment at border
    Unfair to Legal Immigrants
    Unfair Business Competition for law abiding companies
    Unlicensed and Uninsured Motorists
    Untaxed Wages
    Voter Fraud

  • Pingback: Hadopi en la Universidad de Illinois

  • Pingback: Universidad crea su propia Hadopi dejando sin Internet a los alumnos al tercer aviso | 18minutos

  • Pingback: Universidad crea su propia Hadopi dejando sin Internet a los alumnos al tercer aviso

  • Pingback: Universidad crea su propia Hadopi dejando sin Internet a los alumnos al tercer aviso - Marketing digital : Marketing digital

  • anonymous

    seems to me that the entertainment industries have little need to do too much now. organisations such as this are falling over themselves to do the job of policing the files, all for free, and to punish anyone found to be, IN THEIR ESTIMATION, GUILTY’. another example of guilt by accusation and association, with no real evidence.

  • NewWorldStoner

    So basically sharing information while learning is now partially prohibited. Great idea guys, what next? Prohibit electricity from computers? Prohibit light from plants? Fuck it, let’s just make it illegal to learn anything, that way no one can ever find out how badly they’re being fucked by the system in the first place, ingenious.

  • TempleNewsam

    Students in too fucking mean to buy a VPN service non shocker

  • Pingback: Universidad crea su propia Hadopi dejando sin Internet a los alumnos al tercer aviso | #iMapas

  • 2013sUxAlready

    ” In response, schools across the country have spent hundreds of
    thousands of dollars installing anti-file-sharing systems on their
    networks and updating their policies. ”

    Money well spent right there. Coulda be used to INCREASE the bandwith and upgrading the classrooms but no. We need to protect the MONOPOLY. As they said the FEDs are pushing those schools to enforce harsh measures. Unless they can afford to cope without federal funding which in Uhmerica is practically impossible for most schools aint it? FU MAFIAA LOBBYISTS!

  • cupid_stunt

    i have a theory. maybe there is not the bandwidth we are being told about. maybe the internet is struggling to cope with 4.7gb torrents. maybe if torrents are not stopped we will all become educated via torrents and books and films exposing what is really going on. i did not even smoke anything to come up with that one!

  • Pingback: Universidad crea su propia Hadopi dejando sin Internet a los alumnos al tercer aviso | SONSEMAR NOTICIAS

  • Pingback: Universidad crea su propia Hadopi dejando sin Internet a los alumnos al tercer aviso. | Nakamatachi

  • asashii fustazi

    idiots downloading Copyrighted material on a colleges internet, dumb @$$es!!!!!

    • Scary_Devil_Monastery

      Some 90% of the educational material used by university students is infringed material. Because buying the originals would cost twice what the student has to live of for the term, in many cases.

      In short, copyright and greedy publishers have put many students in the position of either learning how to infringe, or to drop out.

  • GreenPirate

    Drop out and pirate everything.

  • Pingback: Latino » Blog Archive » Universidad crea su propia Hadopi dejando sin Internet a los alumnos al tercer aviso.

  • Pingback: In the News.. | TorGuard.net Blog - Anonymous VPN Services

  • Michael S

    UCI will kick students out for an infringement notice.

  • Zebra52

    Glad to see that my Alma Mater is focusing on the important aspects of their students education. Surprised to see the University bending over for the RiAA & MPAA.

  • Miami Sunset

    Universities have been known for a long time to be strict about their internet useage. And since it’s a private system they can be held liable. But I suspect the real issue is about bandwidth and those illegal downloads cost them.

    To be fair, since it is a private system they do have the right. While it may be connecting to the internet, it’s done so through their system. Someone is still free to find internet access outside the university.

  • Jason

    UNC-Chapel Hill did this to me on my first offense in October 2009 (Actually had a matching movie ticket, Zombieland).

  • Pingback: Universidad crea su propia Hadopi dejando sin Internet a los alumnos al tercer aviso | Posa Studio Creativo / Centro Integral de Comunicación Visual

  • BTGuard - BitTorrent Anonymously

NewsBits

Even more news...

  • Pirate Bay Founder Gottfrid Svartholm on Freedom of Speech

    Freedom of speech is a highly valued commodity, but should people be allowed to say whatever...

  • Blu-ray Anti-Piracy Tech Stops Discs and Promotes Purchases

    An anti-piracy system present in all official Blu-ray players since 2012 has received a fresh update...

  • Foxtel Breeds Pirates by Locking Up Game of Thrones

    One of the main reasons why people turn to piracy is the lack of legal alternatives....

  • UK Student Admits Breaching Sony Copyrights With Leak of PS3 SDK

    Last year an Internet user known as El Nomeo leaked version 3.70 of Sony’s Playstation3 SDK...

  • Pirates Can Be Identified Despite Sharing IP Addresses, ISP Claims

    Carrier-Grade Network Address Translation is a network mechanism through which many Internet subscribers can share the...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

PopularArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.