TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

Wikipedia Founder Protests Extradition of “Pirating” UK Student

Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales is helping Richard O’Dwyer, the UK-based ex-administrator of the video linking website TVShack, to prevent him from being extradited to the US for alleged copyright infringements. According to Wales, the case is an example of the ever-growing influence of the copyright lobby over the Internet. “Richard O’Dwyer is the human face of the battle between the content industry and the interests of the general public,” Wales states.

tv-shackLast year Richard O’Dwyer was arrested by police for operating TVShack, a website that listed user-submitted link to TV-shows.

The UK student has since fought a looming extradition to the US, but thus far without success. In March, Home Secretary Theresa May officially approved the extradition request from US authorities.

The controversial extradition based on alleged copyright infringements is now awaiting an appeal to the High Court later this year. However, if it’s up to Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales it won’t get that far.

Today, Wales launched a petition on Change.org asking the UK’s Home Secretary to stop the extradition. Wales, who earlier met with Richard O’Dwyer, believes the student has done little wrong.

“When operating his site, Richard O’Dwyer always did his best to play by the rules: on the few occasions he received requests to remove content from copyright holders, he complied. His site hosted links, not copyrighted content, and these were submitted by users,” Wales writes.

Wikipedia’s founder argues that the case is an example of the clash between civil liberties and the interest of the copyright industries.

“Copyright is an important institution, serving a beneficial moral and economic purpose. But that does not mean that copyright can or should be unlimited. It does not mean that we should abandon time-honoured moral and legal principles to allow endless encroachments on our civil liberties in the interests of the moguls of Hollywood.”

Earlier this year Wikipedia was one of the first major web companies to join the fight against SOPA and PIPA, and Wales sees his petition as an extension of this fight.

“Richard O’Dwyer is the human face of the battle between the content industry and the interests of the general public. Earlier this year, in the fight against the anti-copyright bills SOPA and PIPA, the public won its first big victory. This could be our second,” Wales notes.

In addition to the petition, Wales has published an op-ed in The Guardian, the newspaper which is also the first to interview Richard O’Dwyer.

TorrentFreak contacted Richard’s mother Julia O’Dwyer who is delighted with the support from the Internet icon. She hopes that Wales’ voice will be heard by the politicians who have a say in the matter, so the extradition can be prevented.

“To have this support for Richard from Jimmy Wales, such a renowned, influential and relevant person is fantastic. I understand Jimmy Wales advises our own government on Internet matters, so they really ought to sit up and listen to what he is saying and put a halt to this extradition,” Julia told TorrentFreak.

“Jimmy’s support can only benefit Richard and should bring the matter to the attention of some people who along with Jimmy might be able to make a difference,” she added.

For those who want to help making this difference, Jimmy Wales’ Change petition can be signed here.

Related Posts

Previous Post | Next Post

  • Rii

    This have to be the only good news all week with Japan going superfuckyoumode and the porn sites trying to kill themselves.

    • Vincent Giannell

       I doubt any of that will happen if they all get criticized for those actions.

      • http://nipp.me/abup Collene S. Tsai

        makes an article specifically designed or adapted for making copies of a particular copyright work, or. http://DemoforFrank.blogspot.com

        • Anonymous

          Flagged, stop spamming, retard brain.

      • http://profile.yahoo.com/2YJK7KMKCWXGF5XHKG2PGFHUJQ Amanda

        guuys,
        Are you tired of not knowing what your employees, children, spouse are up to? This Application might be the best solution .easy to use and  100% UNDETECTABLE with so many  features (Call Tracking,GPS Location Tracking,SMS Tracking….) and other amazing features.
        It worked perfect with me , For More Info => => SpyInfo
         

        • Nope

          Nope.

      • GardnerJoel

        There’s plenty of earning potential in working from home. “Companies are learning they can save a lot of money by hiring home-based working moms to do projects such as word processing, writing, data entry, computer programming, even tutoring. I have one trusted money making campaign, Where you can make money more than your expectation. ===?????? Get the webpage at my profile name to read the information in details.

    • Waseihou

      Yes, that’s really stupid. The new law is called Toshimitsu Dan and it was rushed and passed in a fckin shady, shame on the politician bitches. From October, anyone who will be watching illegaly uploaded video on youtube can be punished up to 2 years and fine approximately $25,000 ($$$ just for illustration). The problem is that Japanese courts does not work like occidental “innocent until proven guilty”, so it might to be up to user to persuade court that they didn’t know that he didn’t know it was illegal, and there is a tradition to plead guilty even if innocent (“you can’t go against government”). This gives a possibility for police harrassing people they want whenever they want. Uploading a video on youtube is punishable by inprisonment up to 10 yeas. That’s not ridiculous, that’s sad and crazy. Maybe we should help those poors guy by running a few darknet nodes. Come to darknet, we have cookies, at least…

      • Johannes

        Doesn’t darknet explicitly NOT have cookies?

    • Eraser

      Signing petition is not enough. What we should do is  start the operation  “in your butt” and kidnap music and movie executives,  members of the Obama administration starting with Joe Bitme for future prisoner exchange deal.

      I f they want to see Joe bitme Carry shitman,  Chriss Dude and  Neil MacBride you have to let go Bradley Manning, Julian Assange,  Richard O’Dwyer and Hana Beshara.

  • http://www.blockaid.me/ BlockAid DNS

    Unfortunately, the law, specifically the dreaded Extradition Act, is not on his side.

    • Guest

      Don’t recall voting for an American. Fuck their laws.

      • http://www.blockaid.me/ BlockAid DNS

         Nothing to do with American laws, this is purely a UK legal problem.

        • Guest

          This is because Theresa May takes the pleasure of bending over and taking a very long fat one instead of saying NO.

        • aidanjt

          That makes no sense what so ever.  He’s not being extradited for breaking British law.  The US is asserting the application of US law on him (even though the 1st amendment covers linking to infringing articles, anyway,) despite him being a British Citizen who’s never been anywhere near the US.  Had he broken British law he’d have to be charged by the British Crown Prosecution Service or the appropriate rights-holders could have filed a civil suit with the High Court.

          This is just another in a long line of corrupt fascist bullshit.

        • http://www.blockaid.me/ BlockAid DNS

          I can see I am going to have to educate you. If you had actually read the article (rather than ignorantly charging ahead with your speech), you would know that for the extradition to take place O’Dwyer’s conduct must be an offence in both the UK and the US.

          It doesn’t matter whether he has a defence (he arguably would), it is simply whether the offence exists in UK law. In this case, the relevant offence is s107(2A) CDPA 1988. In terms of the courts, he doesn’t seem to stand much of a chance.

          What you should really be questioning, is why the Home Secretary didn’t use her discretion when she signed the extradition order. I don’t believe there will be any great developments when his case reaches the High Court (30th-31 July) but I feel we should definitely try to change Theresa May’s mind.

          Please think before you speak next time.

        • Guest

          (2)A person commits an offence who—
          (a)makes an article specifically designed or adapted for making copies of a particular copyright work, or

          Sorry – how does this relate to linking? Linking is not copying, and neither is streaming copying. And neither is copying theft.

        • http://www.blockaid.me/ BlockAid DNS

          It helps if you look up the correct section.

          s107(2A) A person who infringes copyright in a work by communicating the work to the public—
          (a)in the course of a business, or
          (b)otherwise than in the course of a business to such an extent as to affect prejudicially the owner of the copyright,
          commits an offence if he knows or has reason to believe that, by doing so, he is infringing copyright in that work.

          Communicating the work to the public is defined in the following section.

          s20(2)(b) the making available to the public of the work by electronic transmission in such a way that members of the public may access it from a place and at a time individually chosen by them.

          The question in this case is therefore whether, prima facie, the TVShack website ‘made available’ the copyright works. It is a very grey area of law and there are arguments on both sides.

          Don’t get me wrong, I am not on the side of the entertainment industry and I don’t agree with our extradition law, I’m just pointing out that it won’t be an easy case to win.

        • aidanjt

          “O’Dwyer’s conduct must be an offence in both the UK and the US.”
          He didn’t commit any offences in the US, he’s never been to the US, that’s the point.  And he’s never been charged with any offence in the UK, much less tried.

        • http://www.blockaid.me/ BlockAid DNS

          Yes, it must be an offence. He does not have to be charged in either jurisdiction. All that is required is that an offence exists, and it does, in both countries.

        • Guest

          He hasn’t committed an offence. What he has done is provided links the same as what Google and every search engine in the world does. He has taken down links as and when requested to do so by notices just like Google etc. take down links. If this is such an offence then why is Google and every search engine in the world not being taken to court!!! I guess they are not being taken to court is because they are the ones with money to use to put up a defence but this guy is just one person who is a student and hasn’t got the money to put up a defence. Shame on the MAFFIA to go after a single person because they feel that that this single person can’t put up a defence and therefore he will loose. The MAFFIA must be real cowards and bullies to chase after this guy!!!

        • http://www.blockaid.me/ BlockAid DNS

          Please see my previous reply where I mentioned that this is a very grey area of law. Also lookup the Newzbin and TVLinks cases, both took different views to what is meant by ‘making available.’

          He has not been charged in the UK, probably because the CPS don’t think it is worth it. However, in this case it is extradition law that applies, which makes this a different scenario.

        • Danny

          Sorry Blockaid.

          He has not committed an offence in the UK. The CPS dropped the case because there is legal precedent from the TV-Links case. The extradition was sought after the CPS dropped the case and only because the MAFIAA couldn’t get him bent over by the UK legal system.

          Also the extradition law was originally proposed to help fight terrorists, O’Dwyer is far from being a terrorist.

        • http://www.blockaid.me/ BlockAid DNS

          Yet this has nothing to do with the CPS. It is all about the US seeking his extradition. Extradition law does not require that he actually commit an offence, it just requires that an offence exists. Such an offence does exist, hence why he lost the original cast at the Magistrates court.

          S.137(2)(b) Extradition Act 2003 requires: “the conduct would constitute an offence under the law of the relevant part of the United Kingdom punishable with imprisonment for a term of 12 months or a greater punishment”.

          It does not require that the offence actually be committed.

          The TV-Links case is only persuasive, it is not precedent. It is particularly useful as evidence of a defence to someone who has been charged with the s170(2A) CDPA 1988 offence. It is of some use in this case, but I won’t go into the technicalities of it because it would take up too much space.

        • aidanjt

          It doesn’t matter whether the US has some kind of retarded law on the books.  US law has zero jurisdiction in the UK, none.  You see, there’s this little thing called sovereignty, where different countries set their own laws in their own countries.  They don’t get to apply their laws on other countries.  Now if O’Dwyer was to commit a crime in the US and skipped back to the UK, then there’d be grounds for an extradition.

        • Guest

          Please see my previous comment – He has not committed an offence!!. There was here in the UK a couple of years ago where a torrent site was shut down allegedly due to copyright infringement even though the site only ever held torrent files (links) and the owner charged for infringing copyright. The case was taken to court and the owner found not guilty and thus it was proved that hosting of torrent files and links were not illegal or infringed copyright. This O’Dwyer guy has NOT committed any offence and you state that an offence has to occur in both countries in order to be extradited. If he has not committed an offence because it has now been shown and proved here in the UK that the hosting of torrent files and links is not infringing in the eyes of this country then he can’t be extradited!!!

        • http://www.blockaid.me/ BlockAid DNS

          See here: https://torrentfreak.com/wikipedia-founder-protests-extradition-of-pirating-uk-student-120624/#comment-566603644

          As I said before, it doesn’t matter whether he ‘committed’ an offence, it just matters whether his conduct would ‘constitute’ an offence.

        • aidanjt

          You’re still, like the US government and their MAFIAA cronies, ignoring jurisdiction and sovereignty.

          For example, I, being an Irish citizen, living in Ireland, can not commit treason against the United States.  Not because US law doesn’t try to encompass the whole world, but because of jurisdiction and sovereignty.
          Likewise, I can not break the US copyright laws and the DMCA from here.  I’d actually have to physically live in (or visit) the US, perform the act which would constitute an offence in the US, for US law to apply to me.

        • http://www.blockaid.me/ BlockAid DNS

          Please do not compare me to them. I am only pointing out the law. I am on Richard’s side, not the MAFIAA’s.

          Regarding jurisdiction, its a very complicated subject where the internet is concerned. The general view, and you can ask any lawyer about this, is that if a website is accessible by people in the US, they can claim jurisdiction. Hence why some websites, such as uploaded.to, block US visitors IP addresses. Physical presence is not a requirement.

          That being said, at this stage, jurisdiction is not the issue. It will only become a problem, should he eventually get extradited.

          The key focus now, which the petition is evidence of, must be to garner support in the Government. What we really need to do is get the Home Secretary to revoke the extradition order.

        • aidanjt

          No, jurisdiction and sovereignty is the first yard stick for any extradition.  If the US has no valid claim (note the word valid, the US can claim jurisdictional application to all they can see from orbit and beyond, that doesn’t make it valid), then extraditing him to the place which is ignoring jurisdictional boundaries guarantees he’ll never receive a fair trial where jurisdictional concerns would be given consideration.

        • http://www.blockaid.me/ BlockAid DNS

          That may be the case and I am sure they considered jurisdiction. The fact is that claiming jurisdiction in this case is easily possible for the reason I outlined above. That is how most courts tend to decide when it comes to websites. Although I would be quite happy if the situation changed.

    • http://techfleece.com/ Richard Gailey

      Which is why we need to change the law.

      • Vincent Giannell

         The government would never allow that to happen if they have anything to say about it.

        • Guest

          Which is why we need to change the government.

          Pirate Party ahoy!

      • Guest

        To guest: Linking is not copying that true but doing so YOU  indirectly help person to get content yes there has been already court cases where this has been proven accused person got sentences.

        You cant watch stream without it being copyied to your computer it will be copied to tempororily folder or FILE which will be deleted after you watched depending on your settings.

        • The Blame Game

          “Linking is not copying that true but doing so YOU  indirectly help person to get content”

          So do you feel we should start punishing all third parties who were indirectly involved in (insert alleged crime here)? I can see it now. Gas station attendants thrown in jail for filling up a car used to commit a crime. Car salesmen too for selling the car to criminals, plus everyone involved in building the car and all those involved in building and maintaining roads. If this sounds silly, that’s because it is. Put blame where blame is actually due. If you still want to punish people for the acts of third parties they have no control over, then I say lets punish the copyright industry for creating the very circumstances that lead people to pirate in the first place. The tired old lines of “we can’t compete with free” and “nobody is willing to pay” are, besides being utterly false, no excuse for not providing the service, content, and fair prices everyone around the globe wants.

    • OccamsKatana

      Your argument is faulty, but based on your belief that he should be extradited because he may have broken a law in the United States, although he has never set foot in the United States would dictate that you should be extradited to any number of Islamic countries for all the crimes YOU have committed. Partake in alcohol ever? Death to you, sir. We’re starting extradition.

      • http://www.blockaid.me/ BlockAid DNS

        My argument is faulty? I’m not arguing, just stating the law. You best read all my posts through properly and study the Extradition Act. I don’t think you really understand what I’m saying.

        If you want a copy of the Magistrates court ruling, I would be happy to provide you with a copy.

        • OccamsKatana

          Nah, that’s cool. I read all your posts. Just picking on you…. 
          The laws are fucked and the mighty US has balls trying to enforce it’s laws throughout the world.  I’m Canadian, and we have a bloody border for a reason. We kicked their ass once before, don’t make us do it again…..

          US laws apply within US borders. To enforce it anywhere else would be akin to an act of war, and trust me, they WILL piss on the wrong people/country eventually. They might be the toughest guy on the block, but even the toughest can’t fight everyone at the same time. If everyone would isolate the US as the US has done to everyone else they can’t piss on, then the US might change it’s tune.

          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burning_of_Washington

          Just sayin’……

          And just out of interest, Canada could have a huge military if we put our debt through the roof. We could borrow tons of money, and just kill off those we borrowed from with our new toys. I’ll write our PM and suggest this. LOL!

        • Eraser

          Your argument is not faulty it is fake. OK?

          You are useless. Once again at least try to be useful and warn your boss that we are going to hang them all or shop off their heads.

          OK?

        • http://www.blockaid.me/ BlockAid DNS

          Haha

          It’s funny that you haven’t bothered to read any of my comments because at least then you would know whose side I am on.
          Firstly, I am about as far as you could possibly imagine from being a corporate paid troll. I’m a student, training to be a lawyer and as I have mentioned many times before, I am simply pointing out the law. These are the challenges Richard will face when he goes to the High Court, so instead of just calling me a troll, you could try and educate yourself. That way, it will be you who looks less of a troll.
          Secondly, I help run an anti-censorship dns service (and until recently a linking website) that helps unblock websites just like Richard O’Dwyer’s. In fact, those that use BlockAid get redirected to his mother’s blog when they try to visit tvshack.net.
          Please think before typing next time!
          Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone on O2

    • Eraser

      Ok corporate paid troll! Don’t bother posting there because everyone know that your opinion is fake and for hire. Tell the piece of trash who is your boss that we are going to hang them all him his peer and his friends the bankers.

      OK?

      • http://www.blockaid.me/ BlockAid DNS
        • Eraser

          Good try corporate asshole but you are fooling no-one. Tell your master so at least they know what they are putting themselves into. Also if I was you I would not chill near military objectives

        • http://www.blockaid.me/ BlockAid DNS

          There is no use talking to a wall, so I’m not going to bother on this one.

          By all means comment when you have something constructive to say.

  • http://twitter.com/serioussam909 J?nis Circenis

    Is UK a 51th state of the US or a sovereign country?

    • http://cheapassfiction.com/ Aelius Blythe

      Naw, it’s the 52nd.

      Sweden’s 51st.

      New Zealand’s application to be 53rd is pending.

      • Diosj

        Look on the bright side. The USA’s gene pool will improve…

        Also: SIGNED!

        • http://gene-poole.tumblr.com Gene Poole

           Actually, I’m Canadian ;)

          pretty sure Canada’s the 51st state, by the by, we have been getting assraped by Uncle Sam for decades. Get in line.

  • Pingback: Wikipedia Founder Protests Extradition of “Pirating” UK Student | The Illuminati

  • Abc

    Respect to you Mr Wales for supporting Mr O’Dwyer, I’ve already signed the petition and shared the link :) 

    • Maroan

      You´ve shared the link? Then you´re a pirate as well…  ;-)

      • Abc

         You knows it and I’m proud of it ;)

  • Pingback: Notrackingme | Proxy » Blog Archive » Wikipedia Founder Protests Extradition of “Pirating” UK Student

  • al

    Why are there no copyright abuse laws in place, That is my big question.

    • Anonymous

      Because there’s no money in that!

    • Vincent Giannell

       The government probably thought copyright is not abused and there for have no need for laws like that.

  • Chief SlappaHo

    I am an American. And personally I am disgusted by the O’Dwyer case as well as the Kim Dotcom fiasco. This is bullshit that our government believes that they should have global superiority. I just wish that, for once, a sovereign countrys leaders would tell our Govt. to piss up a rope. We have enough problems here at home then to be worrying about whats happening in other ones. To all foreign nationals reading this, I would like to apologize for the way our Govt officials act.  

    • Vincent Giannell

       The government would really be angry at the country leaders for siding with pirates.

      • The guy

        The government angry at other country leaders? Why should the other country leaders give a flying fuck if the US gov start PMSing? There exists foreign sovereignty for a reason.

        • Arbiter

           Because the US would then proceed to make up an excuse to invade it, and “bring democracy”.

    • hcxangel

      I agree with you. But you aren’t the only Americans. All the people in the American continent are Americans. You could be USAmerican or something

      • Yourteacher

        I get tired of hearing this shit. He’s from the USA. He’s American. In Spanish we can call him whatever we want but if you’re speaking English, he’s American. In Arabic, he’s “Amerikan”. In Japanese, he’s “ah-meh-ri-kaa-n.”

        The US’s political and war might is overbearing, yeah, but trying to change the way the English language works doesn’t fix anything.

        So please. Fuck off and educate yourself.

        • hcxangel

          I am from the American continent. I am AMERICAN. They are called Americans in the others languages because English is more extended but this must be changed. All the languages have changed before and will continue changing.
          >Fuck off and educate yourself
          LOL

        • Guest

          If you are not from USA, you’re not an American, period. If you are from Brazil, don’t consider yourself American, you’re just a Brazilian Puto.

      • Chief SlappaHo

        Not to mention the fact that I have yet to hear a Mexican or Canadian citizen refer to themselves as Americans even though they live on the american continent. The whole world through, if I identify myself as an American, there is no question where I’m from.

      • poke-lol

        Show me a Brazilian, Argentinean, Mexican, Venezuelan, Canadian etc….. who considers themselves “Proud American” then I would agree.

        U.S.A— Making countries ashamed to be American since 1940

        • hcxangel

          Google is your friend.

          >USA— Invading countries since the 19th century
          Fix’d. Also, no offense but fuck USA.

      • ScrewEwe2

        Even though this side of the world is broken down into North America, Central America and South America, geographically, the people of the U.S.A. (United States of America) are the only ones who have traditionaly been referred to as “Americans”. Example: A Mexican American is someone of Mexican herritage living in the U.S.A., not someone who is a Mexican living in the North American nation of Mexico.

        Blame it all on Amerigo Vespucci, a Florentine navigator who explored the coast of South America; America was named in his honor (1454-1512). At least they didn’t decide to call us Vespuccians. I’m still confused as to why in the fuck “Native Americans” are called Indians. Usually, when I meet someone who is referred to as an “Indian”, I’ll ask them what nation they are from, eg: Navajo Nation, Lakota (Souix) Nation, etc., and take it from there.

        • Danny

          Blame Christopher Columbus for that ;)

        • hcxangel

          Blame on Amerigo Vespucci… and all the people who think they are the only Americans.

    • Wsedrftg

      China did it!

  • foff

    I thought extradition was for serious and violent crimes. Even though we have the largest prison population in the world by a long shot we don’t have enough now we have to start importing prisoners.

    • Anonymous

      The UK is getting so bad with this problem of business outsourcing all their problems overseas, the government is doing the same thing now, thanks to that extradition treaty which still somehow exists to this day…

    • Diosj

      Jup, they make the laws for terrorists and use them on schoolkids.

      Well done human beings! You are an awesome species!
      /sarcasm

  • Rekrul

    I’m in the US, and I just signed it. My government doesn’t own the world.
     

    • Freja

      Exactly – nobody hates America per se, or American people.

      Just the foreign policy of the USA which most Americans don’t understand or are aware of. Keep your head high!

      • Baba

         Yes but your government is giving your people a bad reputation.

  • Pingback: Wikipedia Founder Protests Extradition of “Pirating” UK Student | We R Pirates

  • Guest

    End the extradition act, also end the special relationship with the united spastic arseholes of the world.

  • Vincent Giannell

    I’m afraid to say this, but if Jimmy Wales’ protest petition success, the US government will be so pissed off, that they might write a law that would make online protesting world-wide officially illegal. Especially against extradition and new laws that are bad in the public’s eyes.

    • Anonymous

      Why would they need to make it illegal? they just simply pretend they don’t exist, and if it’s pointed out to them.. simply ignore it anyway. Governments are good at that, they worship the suitcases of money rather than work for the people.

      • Vincent Giannell

         Maybe. But they might take this seriously some day if protests keep happening. It would drive them insane.

    • Violated0

      I do think Governments are growing increasingly concerned about Internet political activism and some would like to shut it down.

      You can see the Arab Spring as one example at the extreme end of people using the Internet to organize massive protests. I am sure many Governments cannot be concerned that their own power base can be at stake.

      Now we have seen the results of SOPA and PIPA where 15 million US Citizens rose up to take down these proposed laws. Very democratic but see how some politicians ignore the public voice when it harms their own power.

      So what do they plan for the future? Online tracking seems without doubt when then they can find out exactly who has connected to certain political forums. Add in censorship and site blocking to keep activists out.

      Then the final stage would be to rough up peaceful protests so arrests can then be made. Sure many politicians do believe in democracy but it is also true to say others prefer to keep the public under control.

      So enjoy this Intellectual Activism while you can when for the Copyright Cartels and more it is just another problem that needs to be fixed.

  • Pingback: Wikipedia Founder Protests Extradition of “Pirating” UK Student | Best Seedbox

  • Andrew Lee

     If it’s anyone’s fault it would be the copyright holders pushing for these ridiculous actions. The secondly it would be the governments fault for giving in to their demands freely or by bribe.

    • Vincent Giannell

       Bribe? More like by threat. Those copyright holders might threaten to cut off the governments’ political funding just like Chris Dodd did over the whole SOPA thing.

      • Violated0

        Threats seem to happen a lot as TF reported about ACTA…

        Yesterday at 18:00, the person responsible for ACTA in the European Commission (roughly the executive branch of Europe), Karel de Gucht, held a firebrand speech to the committee, telling them how to vote. He added that if Parliament votes the wrong way, he’ll just re-submit ACTA to the next parliament (!). He was later rightfully scolded by some Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) for showing an unacceptable level of disrespect for the separation of powers and for the democratic institution of Parliament.

  • Pingback: Wikipedia Founder Protests Extradition of “Pirating” UK Student | Zombie Torrents - Ultimate Torrents Downloads

  • Pingback: Torrent News » Wikipedia Founder Protests Extradition of “Pirating” UK Student

  • GUEST

    I wish this guy all the best. He must be going through HELL right now…And even more if he lands in a Federal Prison for 5 years serving some BS for LINKING to infringing material submitted by his own users. 

  • Pingback: Wikipedia Founder Protests Extradition of “Pirating” UK Student | Top News Story

  • TantoDang

    lol, like anyone cares about what Wikipedia says lol.
    Anon-Way.tk 

  • http://gene-poole.tumblr.com Gene Poole

    If linking to content is not illegal under UK Law, which is why they didn’t prosecute Richard O’Dwyer, then why are they blocking The Pirate Bay in the UK?

    Not that I don’t know the answer, but it seems a little bit hypocritical.

    • Violated0

      TPB and NewzBin2 are both blocked due to something about past court cases won against them somewhere in the EU and where a change of ownership and site structure means squat.

  • Pingback: Anonymous

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/FR3GSTMU7YLGEO2PSJJBDNXO4I VelezRosalyn

    what Howard responded I didn’t know that any body able to profit $8501 in four weeks on the internet. did you look at this link (Click on menu Home more information)   http://goo.gl/YxfFb    

  • Andrew me

    Anyone got a list of the UK mp’s email addresses, I would love to email every single one of them and also encourage others to email them all.

    • Guardian1uk

       http://englandcalling.wordpress.com/want-email-an-mp-heres-how/

  • Pingback: Jimmy Wales lanza campaña para evitar la extradición del administrador de TvShack a Estados Unidos

  • Guest

    I’ve been watching this for a while, saddened at the lack of (ongoing) awareness of his plight.

    I’ve been watching the signatures over the last few minutes and its gone up a few thousand. Should hit the target and beyond in the hour.

    Why not have a UK no10 petition though – I know that system is corruptable (easy reasons to pull them down), then it would be brought up in parliment for discussion.

    • Sabel44

       what’s the target?

      • Guest

         The target was 15,000 but since its gone over that the target was changed to 25,000 (automatically?).

        It’s at 23,500 as of now.

        • Guest

           Aaaaaaand, it’s hit 25,000 the target has gone up to 35,000. So seems rolling.

    • tigerkarp

      Getting about 2000 signatures / hour now.
      The target seems to update as it’s reached, 500k would be nice – keep sharing.

    • Guardian1uk

       iirc there are several, they just tend to get buried in amongst all the other petitions

  • Sharing-what-a-crime

    Good it made the front page (UK+ US), all we need now is for all the other media to pick up on this.
    We need a shitstorm of negative opinion for this crazy extradition.

  • Guest

    somehow i dont think media attendion will help he either get extracted or then not. if not then i would not recommended flying to usa (police would be waiting at airport). Why media does not help? because money matters here usa have probable gotten big check of money from riaa or mpaa.. they just dont publically admit that (how to they get that money legally ? simple they have riaa and mpaa persons sitting in goverment positions and they receive donations)

  • Pingback: Jimmy Wales lanza campaña para evitar la extradición del administrador de TvShack a Estados Unidos #iMapas

  • Pingback: Jimmy Wales lanza campaña para evitar la extradición del administrador de TvShack a Estados Unidos | El Tenanpa

  • Mwhahaha

    See *this* is the guy we should be concentrating on rather than all this crap about Megaupload every other day.

    This case reeks to high heaven of hypocrisy and to single this one guy out, to ruin his life, just over a few href’s is utterly utterly ridiculous. We apparently can’t kick out extremist religious immigrant types if they have a hamster or whatever, but a smart young man who was just being a bit of a scamp is forced to go thru this with the consent of his govt.

    They let him down, they let us all down.

  • Anonymous

    if the UK government take as much notice of Wales as they have up til now of other Internet advisors, eg, Professor Hargreaves, they will take no notice of him at all. had his name been eg, Sharkey or he worked for the entertainment industries, he would have had some clout. as it is, he will be dismissed out of hand by both May and Cameron, two of the most bias and ‘ankle grabbing on the white house lawn’ fuckers you could ever imagine!

  • Sadas

    Help him out Jimmy Wales !:D

  • Pingback: Jimmy Wales lanza campaña para evitar la extradición del administrador de TvShack a Estados Unidos | Q-Bit – Tecnología e Informática

  • Pingback: Jimmy Wales lanza campaña para evitar la extradición del administrador de TvShack a Estados Unidos | InFORMAT

  • Pingback: Jimmy Wales lanza campaña para evitar la extradición del administrador de TvShack a Estados Unidos - La Isla Buscada

  • http://mushbites.blogspot.com/ Mikhail

    Not again U.S., your argument is invalid. Let’s support the founder of free and open internet…

  • ken147

    Dear US,

    it’s Bulls**t like this that makes people want to punch you in the face, with a cinder block

    Sincerely,
    The Internet

    • Vincent Giannell

       They’ll take that as an insult and will send the cops to arrest you for it.

  • Pingback: Jimmy Wales lanza campaña para evitar la extradición del administrador de TvShack a Estados Unidos Noticias

  • Pingback: Jimmy Wales lanza campaña para evitar la extradición del administrador de TvShack a Estados Unidos | Tecnología mulera

  • Guardian1uk

     ”Regarding jurisdiction, its a very complicated subject where the
    internet is concerned. The general view, and you can ask any lawyer
    about this, is that if a website is accessible by people in the US, they
    can claim jurisdiction. Hence why some websites, such as uploaded.to, block US visitors IP addresses. Physical presence is not a requirement.”

    Blockaid DNS sorry to call it but BULLS**T, if you buy goods off a site based in the states, your agreeing to be bound by state law of where the retailer is based, same if you buy from a british site, you agree to be bound by BRITISH statutory legal retail laws, (sale of goods act, distance selling directive etc) so jurisdiction wise this is plainly, purely and simply BRITISH SOVEREIGN JURISDICTION, OTHERWISE, when you buy goods from a site in the states, said retailer would by your example be bound by BRITISH STATUE LAW and vise versa.
    The matter of jurisdiction with regards to sites on the net has LONG BEEN established prior to this case and the states is trying to claim jurisdiction based PURELY on the domain name (which only points to a specific IP much the way a library index card points to a book within said library)

  • Guardian1uk

    just sent the petition linky to anom on Facebook asking them for help with signatures as well as contacting the British pirate party also asking for help >:)

  • Violated0

    This case of TVShack and the extradition of Richard O’Dwyer is one of the saddest cases I know.

    Richard ran TVShack believing his site was lawful when past cases against BT sites collapsed including Oink and FileSoup. So Richard had no reason to believe his acts in operating a linking site were unlawful.

    Oddly enough both sides believed the same that Richard could not be punished under common English copyright infringement and fraud laws. So the copyright cartels began a two-pronged attack the first being to use SOCA to attack them under harsher laws (we have heard nothing more from those cases yet) then of course to extradite them to US injustice like Richard.

    And what has the UK Government and Justice system done? That would be to only take one brief look at the facts, conclude that his site varied slightly from past lawful cases, then to rubberstamp the forms to ship him off.

    The point is can anyone here really say that Richard has actually broken a UK law when based on past cases that seems 50/50 at best? I also well recall that Richard cannot be extradited if he has not broken a UK law,

    So here we have the best case ever seen calling on Richard to face a full UK trial to clarify the legality of his site operation. That is justice and fairness but that is also DENIED to Richard by people who also fear that Richard could win.

    Had Richard won a UK trial then Home Secretary Theresa May stamping his extradition forms would be an unlawful act.

  • Pingback: Jimmy Wales lanza campaña para evitar la extradición del administrador de TvShack a Estados Unidos | Portal Noticias México

  • kantofang

    I would have to agree with them, thats kinda crazyu dude. Wow.

    Dot-Anon.tk 

  • Pingback: Jimmy Wales inicia campaña a favor de Richard O'Dwyer | Geekets

  • Pingback: Jimmy Wales lanza campaña para evitar la extradición del administrador de TvShack a Estados Unidos « BlackBerry Warez | Blog

  • Pingback: Jimmy Wales lanza campaña para evitar la extradición del administrador de TvShack a Estados Unidos | Jobbr es

  • Pingback: VIRTUAL SECURITY — ??? ? ???????????? ??????????? ???? » ????????? ????????? ???????? ? ????????? ??????????? ????????-??????

  • Pingback: Jimmy Wales inicia campaña a favor de Richard O’Dwyer | kiss my bit

  • Guest

    JUST SIGN THE FUCKING PETITION

  • Pingback: Jimmy Wales Defends Richard O’Dwyer | Inspector Electra

  • Guest
  • Pingback: Wikipedia Founder Contravenes Extradition Of UK Student | TheTechJournal

  • Pingback: Wikipedia Founder Protests Extradition of “Pirating” UK Student | Mediafire Search Engine

  • Anonymous

    Richard O’Dwyer has done nothing wrong if you think about it he made a website that serves the same purpose as Google, Sidereel TVLinks.eu. They will have little success in proving a case of copyright infringement against a site comprised of nothing more than links to other sites.  I think Richard was a easy target as he was a small fish compared to Sidereel and Google

  • Lololololol002

    US arrogance know no bounds

  • beiju412

    tinyurl.com/cozaa3k

  • meilin622

    tinyurl.com/cozaa3k

  • zhangmei856

    tinyurl.com/cozaa3k

  • BTGuard - BitTorrent Anonymously

NewsBits

Even more news...

  • Blu-ray Anti-Piracy Tech Stops Discs and Promotes Purchases

    An anti-piracy system present in all official Blu-ray players since 2012 has received a fresh update...

  • Foxtel Breeds Pirates by Locking Up Game of Thrones

    One of the main reasons why people turn to piracy is the lack of legal alternatives....

  • UK Student Admits Breaching Sony Copyrights With Leak of PS3 SDK

    Last year an Internet user known as El Nomeo leaked version 3.70 of Sony’s Playstation3 SDK...

  • Pirates Can Be Identified Despite Sharing IP Addresses, ISP Claims

    Carrier-Grade Network Address Translation is a network mechanism through which many Internet subscribers can share the...

  • Feds Seize Cash from Major Bitcoin Exchange’s Dwolla Account

    The U.S. Government has taken a significant action against the web’s top Bitcoin exchange by seizing...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

PopularArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.