TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

$7,000 Fine for Sharing “WordPress For Dummies” on BitTorrent

A New York federal court has ordered a rare default judgment in favor of John Wiley & Sons, one of the world’s largest book publishers. Robert Carpenter from Poughkeepsie, New York, has been ordered to pay the publisher $7,000 in damages for sharing a copy of “WordPress All-in-One For Dummies” on BitTorrent. According to Judge William Pauley, the man is guilty of both copyright and trademark infringement.

bittorrent for dummiesLast fall, John Wiley and Sons became the first book publisher to go after BitTorrent users in the US. And the publisher didn’t stop at just one.

In recent months Wiley has filed more than a dozen mass BitTorrent lawsuits involving a few hundred John Doe defendants in total.

The Does are all accused of sharing digital copies of titles including “Hacking for Dummies,” “Day Trading for Dummies” and “Cooking Basics for Dummies.”

Talking to TorrentFreak, Wiley’s attorney William Dunnegan said previously that one of the main goals of the legal campaign is to obtain the personal details of the alleged infringers and offer them the opportunity to solve the matter through a settlement.

However, when a defendant is unresponsive to the settlement offer, Wiley is prepared to go a step further.

Earlier this year the book publisher named several defendants in an updated complaint, and one has now been ordered to compensate Wiley for sharing a copy of “WordPress All-in-One For Dummies” on BitTorrent.

Judge William Pauley entered a default judgement of $7,000 in damages against Robert Carpenter, who failed to respond to the allegations. The man from Poughkeepsie, New York, has been found guilty of a unique combination of both copyright and trademark infringement.

To our knowledge, this is the first time that sharing files on BitTorrent has been viewed as counterfeiting, a description that’s usually reserved for fake goods sold as the real deal.

For the copyright violations Carpenter has to pay $5,000 in damages plus another $2,000 for the counterfeiting. This is relatively mild compared to the allowed maximum statutory damages of $150,000 Wiley asked for.

“Judgement shall be entered in favor of Wiley and against Carpenter for damages in the amount of $7,000, representing $5,000 in statutory damages pursuant to 17 U.S.C 504 (c) for Carpenter’s infringement of Wiley’s copyright, and $2,000 in statutory damages pursuant to 17 U.S.C 504 (c) for Carpenter’s counterfeiting of Wiley’s Trademarks,” Judge Pauley writes.

Thus far Wiley has enjoyed a relatively easy ride in court. In several cases the New York federal court has allowed the book publisher to subpoena Internet providers for the personal details of account holders.

This means that aside from the $7,000 in damages from Carpenter, the book publisher may have raked in more than a million dollars though private settlements. Private settlements are usually around $3,000 per person, which quickly adds up with hundreds of defendants.

TorrentFreak asked Wiley for a comment on the outcome of the case but we have yet to hear back.

Related Posts

Previous Post | Next Post

  • thedude321

    Well, you can always find a Dummies book anywhere….But then again…way leads to way…

    For some reason…since they are so widely available… I never considered downloading them! :P

    • http://twitter.com/CynthiaJParker Cynthia J. Parker

      7,000 for sharing 1 book that you can just get at the library? http://FoxGetPositionWork.blogspot.com

      • Trespass

        Cleverly disguised spam, but spam none the less…  Do it somewhere else!

    • Guest

       I would pay John Wiley and his  Sons with lead.

      • Trespass

        Does psychopathic behavior run in the family? Turn off the TV and go to a park or something….

  • Pingback: Notrackingme | Proxy » Blog Archive » $7,000 Fine for Sharing “WordPress For Dummies” on BitTorrent

  • Trespass

    Newest book to be released, Extortion for Dummies.  Just don’t share it! : )

    • How to Win The Internet

      And another

      How To Get Trolled for Dummies

      1) be **John Wiley & Sons

      2) rape money out of people on the internet
       
      3) ??????

      4) profit

      ** alternatives accepted

      • http://twitter.com/viciouzex Joseph Fernandez

        reddit here you come.

  • Pingback: Anonymous

  • Wal-Mart

    Public sites for the Fail

    • FrostyC

      Private sites are usually severely infiltrated and with a smaller user-base, they usually go under after a case. How many time have TPB team been in court? Site’s still up. There is a major security through obscurity because they can’t watch everyone all the time.

      • EricPost

        Like What.CD? How has that managed to stand so strong, so  long?

        • FrostyC

          No one listens to commercial music anymore. :P

    • Desu1

      You do realize it’s possible to pull up the swarm of a private torrent right?

  • Devin

    LOL, sometimes I’m so glad to be blind and a student, because there’s a wonderful service called Bookshare that gives us blind folks that are students free access to books in formats we can use, no DRM, well at least none that I’ve seen yet. And for adults and stuff its just like $70 or so annually.

    • Guest

      Blind blind or legally classed as blind? If you’re blind blind then how are you viewing / reading the article?

      • McCheezits

        He could be using a TTS engine, like quite a few people use, or any other wonderful technology designed to make life easier for the blind.

      • DutchGuest

         There is software (and hardware) that reads pages to blind users, so i assume that’s what Devin uses.

      • Guest

        Do you realize that there is a massive blind userbase on the internet ?
        Screen readers are the tool of use.

        “Legally classed as blind”
        Level of visual impairment is not relevant, you can either read the screen or not.
        There are plenty of people who can not read text, who are not “legally blind”. I hate that phrase, it implies falseness of blindness, even if the person can only see a blur of shadows.

        Legally classed as blind is fucking BLIND

      • Read Section 508

        Seriously?! What do you think blind people do? Sit in a dark room all day?  

        • IDIOCRACY

           does it matter if the room is dark or lit? don´t think so, …. so then there is the electricity bill, turn  off all lights because you don´t need them, you are blind…. so yes they sit in a dark room all day when it is winter and they live above or near a polar circle (rovaniemi for example) hehe.

    • hikaricore

       ”at least none that I’ve seen yet”

      ^ I loled.

    • Guest

       @Devin “no DRM, well at least none that I’ve seen yet.”  Coming from a blind student that’s comedy genius.

      • Guest

         I teach people that are blind and it is totally cool to say “see you later” or “not that I have seen”. People that are blind can “see” in the same sense, just not like sighted people do. JAWS is a common program used for screen reading and can be used quicker than people using their eyes to read, with much practice! Just for future reference, if a person that is blind or has decreased vision (legally blind, not a bad word) said “I see what you mean” it is not necessarily a joke. 

    • dwpbike

      nexus to this discussion is tenuous, but the pitch for bookshare seems obvious.

    • SCUM

      you hear that America there are CP lawsuits here staring you in the face, think of all the money you can take of them blind folk, quick get them into court $$$$$$$

    • Guest

       Now if only they would add more text books to book-share all that meaty information could be available for study! Information should be shared not priced and guarded. 

  • Pavelanibal

    How I can download this! sorry for my English. I´m Peruvian.

  • Byte Master

    7,000 for sharing 1 book that you can just get at the library?

    http://us.pirate.is/

    • http://profiles.google.com/zerianis10 Christopher Kidwell

      Yeah, doesn’t make a lick of sense here that they would charge him 7K for this. This judge needs to read the latest rulings that an IP address is NOT equal to a specific person in the slightest.

      • Dumbjudge

         The Judge clearly has no gumption when it comes to the internet.

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_NINJ2XQMX4V6VHUQWPPVLEYZI4 Smilin' Bob

        The problem is Carpenter didn’t show up to defend himself.  Automatic guilty.  The judge had no choice.

    • Katykelly

      That’s the point. Borrow from the library.
      Stealing books cheats the publisher and the author. 99 percent of authors do not make enough royalties to support themselves without working a full-time job. Do you really begrudge them their royalties? Would you be mad if a pickpocket took two bucks out of your wallet? Would you be mad if 1,000 pickpockets  took two bucks from you? Or if 3,500 pickpockets took $7,000 from you? When pirates take ebooks without paying they are stealing from someone’s paycheck.

  • http://homelessonwheels.com/ Mike | Homeless On Wheels

    How many copies was he allged to have shared? That’s what, a $20 book, list price? so doing the math that’s 350 copies. Sounds like Wiley & Sons have quite a profitable racket going on. I wonder if they make more money on lawsuits than book sales?

    • McCheezits

      Being from New Zealand, the cheapest copies of books from the ‘For Dummies’ series I’ve been able to purchase are relatively cheap, slightly damaged-in-transit copies from a third-party retailer.

      For undamaged copies, the prices at Whitcoulls (the biggest bookseller in NZ) start at around $60 NZD, so I think ebook ‘piracy’ (for no financial gain) is actually worth downloading.

    • Asdf

       racket? I heard some dudes at megaupload were caught with copyrighted rackets and now they’re pretty fucked! man, these rackets are serious business

      • Neil.

        Only idiots believe everything they hear.

  • Anonymous

    so an IP address was the proof used? how did that equate to a specific person then? perhaps the book that was shared was counterfeit then, not the real deal? i wonder how that was proven? if it wasn’t the real deal, what harm was done by sharing the counterfeit one? what right did John Wiley & Sons have to sue over something that wasn’t theirs? seems like another case of ‘you are gonna be screwed son, guilty or not!!’ may well have been a small fine in comparison to some but how can failing to respond be automatically taken as being guilty? why not take it as automatically being innocent? isn’t there a 50/50 chance of either?

    • Desu1

      Civil cases don’t need proof. 

      • Caladus

        Civil cases need proof, but the bar is set much lower than criminal cases.

        • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_NINJ2XQMX4V6VHUQWPPVLEYZI4 Smilin' Bob

          You don’t need proof when the accused doesn’t show up to defend himself.  That’s why it was a default judgment.

  • al

    “WordPress All-in-One For Dummies” seriously, he probably gave the book more attention than it deserved.

  • Elasbett3

    look like the judge wife refused to fuck with him , so he decided to fuck someone else

  • Wiley Sucks Butt

    Copyright Trolling for Dummies about to be released?

  • Pingback: Torrent News » $7,000 Fine for Sharing “WordPress For Dummies” on BitTorrent

  • http://cheapassfiction.com/ Aelius Blythe

    This is “WordPress for Dummies” by Lisa Sabin-Wilson?  I contacted her along with the other “Dummies” authors last year when all this started, but never got a response.  

    As I discovered talking to some of the other “For Dummies” authors and doing a bit of research, authors don’t actually hold the copyright to the “For Dummies” books (unlike with most novels where the publisher registers (c) in the author’s name.)  So the author literally has NO say. However, I can’t help but feel that abysmal judgements like this might be made more difficult if the authors spoke up.  

    That said, I for one am off to contact Ms. Sabin-Wilson again.  Anyone who wants to join me, she can be contacted…….. 

    On her personal site:    http://lisasabin-wilson.com/contact/

    On Twitter:  https://twitter.com/#!/lisasabinwilson

    Or via the form on her company’s site:    http://ewebscapes.com/contact/

    • al

      I agree with your post and will make contact. Thank You.

    • Desu1

      Of course paid writers don’t own the copyright. Assuming any writer owns the copyright is like assuming all chefs own the restaurant. 

      • Guest

        Actually, it’s like assuming a painter owns the copyright to his or her own painting…

        A reasonable assumption that would be true if copyright made any fucking sense.

      • http://cheapassfiction.com/ Aelius Blythe

        Actually, what publishers usually have is *publishing rights,* which granted, only exist because of copyright, and mean that the publisher is still the one that takes the reader to court, sometimes “on behalf” of the author.  Normally, however, at least with fiction, the copyright is still registered to the author.

        In fact, a publisher that makes you sign away the copyright to a novel is a *huge* red flag.  But again, with fiction.

        • Desu1

          Not talking about novels. Those are personal works. Of course the author holds the copyright. Why hire someone to right a novel?

  • Maxi

    This is why I refuse to buy any of the “… for Dummies” books.

  • Dirk

    I just downloaded “Bittorrenting for Dummies” and it’s awesome. I want to share it with the rest of the world. Does anybody know how? 

    • Guest

       you funny.  =p

  • ScrewEwe2

    I guess it Sucks to be Robert Carpenter.  For the next few years everyone he knows will be giving him shit about this. “You had to pay how much for sharing that book, $7,000? You Dummy! I know that’s what Fred Sanford would straight up call him.

    I paged through a few of the Dummy books in a store years ago and quickly concluded that these books are indeed, for Dumb Asses. With Google and some good forums you can find answers to damn near anything. I’ve learned a lot over the years reading TorrentFreak.

    • Guest

      It isn’t just the Dummy books. The internet has obsoleted book learnin’ in general, and that’s a very good thing. 

      Pre-internet, I wouldn’t be allowed to learn much because I’m poor. Post-internet, I can receive an expert-level education in whatever I damn well please for $0, in my spare time, in the comfort of my own home.

      You want to turn back the clock on that, John Wiley & Sons? TOO BAD, SO SAD. Time moves backwards for no man. Poor folks gon’ be learning WordPress and other technologies whether you rich assholes want them to or not. Don’t like a level playing field? Then you have exactly two options: 1. Go to hell. 2. Go fuck yourselves.

      Have a nice day.

    • Tomato Chain

       Welcome to the CORRUPT land of the “freedom”, called EE.UU.

  • Guest

    Porn studio Devil’s Film has begun issuing subpoenas to get the names of Doe defendants in a new BitTorrent copyright complaint: http://www.torrentlitigation.com/cases/Media-Products-Inc-v-Does-1-120-No-12-cv-30100-(DMA).pdf

    • Porn_Devil

       Is this Porn Devil litigation only able to subpoena people with the District of Massachusetts?

  • Pingback: Cheapass Fiction

  • Pingback: $7,000 Fine for Sharing “WordPress For Dummies” on BitTorrent | The Illuminati

  • Pingback: $7000 Fine for Sharing “WordPress For Dummies” on BitTorrent – TorrentFreak | Upgrade Wordpress

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Don-Dilly/1624894683 Don Dilly

    This smacks of similar troll tactics to ACS:Law. He imfamously spewed out claims, in one case for a game. Then picked on one of those that did not respond (even to tell him to F*&k off) and took the case to court and gained a default/uncontested judgement in his favour to threaten everyone else with. When the matter was looked into more closely it was found there was no proof that the papers were served or that the defendant even existed.

    This case amd ruling seems to be straight out of the troll playbook

  • PandiGandy

    lol, so the Kangaroo Court issued a judgement, Big effin deal lol. Its a piece of paper.

    Global-Privacy.tk

  • PeeNo

    Hey the public Library shares digital books with me and all the rest of library users. I go in with my flash drive, sign in to their computer, checkout what books I want, copy them, and go home.  Should I or the Library be sued for sharing, I mean counterfeiting?   This case is so stupid, It’s just greedy corps. running illegal monopolies and our gov’t getting a piece of the action.
    Besides you gotta be a f*in dummy to get a dumb how-to wannabe book. Just google it, if you can’t find it then, you shouldn’t be working a computer in the 1st place.

    • Desu1

      Yeah but libraries only have ancient books. 

      • Asdf

         ancient books have much wisdom contained in them, have you ever cared to check any? or are you one of those “oh my, the internet is so awesome, everything that came before it must suck major dicks” folks?

  • Daniel

    Legalised extortion! Only in America…

    • Huh

       Apparently this is your first time reading an article on this site.

    • Desu1

      If you believe it’s only in America then someone right now is making a fool of you. 

      • jim

        true—-but America are not helping create a world of love for themselves.

        The sooner the people get the money out of politics, the better.
        Americans are generally nice people.
        The corporate government ????? loved throughout the world ??????

  • Pingback: $7,000 Fine for Sharing “WordPress For Dummies” on BitTorrent | Zombie Torrents - Ultimate Torrents Downloads

  • Game1

    FUCK USA.

  • Pingback: $7000 Fine for Sharing “WordPress For Dummies” on BitTorrent | Open Knowledge

  • Dude

    Gonna share the shit out of Wiley & Sons entire catalog just because they seem to be in need of alittle more promotion.

    • Asdf

       you go ahead and make another case for them. I’d just deleted those things out of my harddrive and then hammer it with a mallet for good measure

      • Master

        If you want to waste a hard drive be my guest. Maybe you should learn a little bit about technology b4 you even post here so as not to seem so naive.

  • foff

    The defendant probably didn’t show up because he has no fucking money.  This judgement probably does not mean squat shit because they will never collect .10 cents.  For dummies books are shit and are available at used book stores by the truckload for almost nothing.

  • Bjohensson

    I will seed 
    WordPress All-in-One For Dummies and all the ‘For dummies’ books with great effort.  F**k you 
    John Wiley & Sons.

  • MoneyMoneyMoney

    and yet more news that deserve the following “theme song”:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ll3uipTO-4A

    keep it up guys!

  • Violated0

    This is sure a sad and annoying case. So John Wiley & Sons sent him speculative invoicing demand letters but heard nothing from him, took him to Court where they still heard nothing from him, then the Judge issues a $7000 fine despite no one knowing where he is or what he is doing.

    Oh let me guess he just got his disabled mother an Internet package so she can keep in touch while he spends years touring outer Mongolia and various other remote places. Only problem is various neighbours hacked her WIFI that used the WEP standard that was popular years ago.

    This only highlights what complete crap this judgement is, We can only hope when they turn up to collect they hear that the person in question has not lived there for years.

    The related problem is that with no defence the Judge believes whatever John Wiley & Sons can slip by him. Counterfeiting on an ORIGINAL copy? Trying to pass off a fake as real for profit? Idiot judge…

  • While E Coyote

    Well I for one will never “share” a for dummies book.  Because I believe that it might help the bastards.  Not only will I not share them I will never ever buy one nor recommend one.  Wiley and sons are on my Blacklist…

  • Guest

    Copyright infringement is one thing, but how does this even qualify for trademark infringement?

    This sounds like another can of worms. You can bet that the MPAA is rubbing its hands in glee; now they can collect for not one, but two alleged infringements to settle for.

  • jojo

    lets go wipe buggers on the for dummies books down at the bookstore :0)

  • Guest32

    William Pauley was the judge in the MP3Tunes case. He seems to have a good grasp on technology, and the only reason for this case going badly is the defendant’s nonreply. If the case had wend to the discovery stage, Pauley would likely not have ruled that an IP address = a person.
    Pauley had no choice and should not be blamed. The defendant was at fault for not responding to the lawsuit. He could have proceeded pro se using the standard motion deny everything.

    • Western Digital

      Yeah, because everyone has a spare couple thousand dollars to hire an attorney in the state of New York where it averages 900 to 1200 to hire someone who would speak on your behalf and file that standard motion in FEDERAL COURT.
       
      He can always appeal.

      Oh, hey Guest32, try working for a living

  • http://twitter.com/Anime4PSP Anime 4 PSP

    They do it only because ppl understand that “‘insert something here’ for dummies” is useless shit and don’t buy it. 
    As for wordpress for dummies, it’s most pointless work. If you need such a shit for, running website/blog is just not for you.
    And this defendant dude is idiot, ignoring then was stupid

  • Chet

    lol the search says this guy is like 66 years old…

  • Pingback: === popurls.com === popular today

  • Pingback: 00 Fine for Sharing “WordPress For Dummies” on BitTorrent ... | Courses

  • Anonymous Ebayer

    Wiley ought to go after EBay. There are usually massive collections of over 300 “For Dummies” ebooks being sold on DVD there.

  • Guests

    Is this another company that can’t admit to itself it has become obsolete because of the amount of digital information sharing? Sounds like they are attacking us for nickels and cents as they go down with the ship of the useless paper books they make about how to do something when all that information is at my fingertips. It is the same swan song of crap movies like “The Hurt Locker”.

  • Racyromances

    Raising Chickens For
    Dummies is being given away today on Filepost, courtesy of the policies of Googlegroups, Picasa, SocialGo, PayPal, Yahoogroups that all support the self-styled “charity” that “shares” copyrighted ebooks, music, magazines, movies for profit that other people have allegedly “shared” on the internet.

  • Guest

    Any time I hear things like this I immediately download the torrent in spite, even if I never actually read it.

  • Pingback: $7000 Fine for Sharing “WordPress For Dummies” on BitTorrent | Wordpress news and updates

  • Pingback: $7,000 Fine for Sharing “WordPress For Dummies” on BitTorrent | Mediafire Search Engine

  • http://c3mdigital.com/ Chris Olbekson

    They are just setting the stage for the upcoming release of Torrenting for Dummies.

  • Billy Vierra
  • Pingback: $7K Fine for Sharing "WordPress For Dummies" on BitTorrent | Matias Vangsnes

  • PelouzeTF

    Carpenter was let off lightly. Was sharing the copy-written works worth it ? of course not.

  • Stoogejudge

    !!!!!Someone send the Judge a link to this comments area.!!!!!

  • Pingback: USA: 7.000 US-Dollar Strafe für Verbreitung eines eBooks | Binzl Online

  • Pingback: BT ?????????????????? | TechOrange

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_UJ4XRIA3A3E6MYGK755EGWLN4Q Dani A

    Copyright infringement I can understand… but where the hell does trademark infringement come in?

  • Pingback: ?? » BT ??????????????????

  • Pingback: Schadensersatz wegen Filesharing: erst die Abmahnung, dann die Klage – 7.000 $ › Infodocc

  • Pingback: Man fined $7,000 for sharing ‘WordPress for Dummies’ via BitTorrent | Matias Vangsnes

  • Pingback: John Wiley and Sons Wins $7,000 for Pirated Book - GalleyCat

  • Pingback: $7,000 Fine for Sharing “WordPress For Dummies” on BitTorrent | Matias Vangsnes

  • Pingback: Copyright Trolling For Dummies – John Wiley & Sons Threaten to Actually Sue People in Court | DieTrollDie

  • Pingback: When the Cosmos Laughs, Part Whatever (Updated) – PagesThatWow.com – Sharing Viral Content

  • Pingback: When the Cosmos Laughs, Part Whatever (Updated — Thrice) – PagesThatWow.com – Sharing Viral Content

  • Pingback: WP Late Night #16 "Thingamatini" | WPCandy

  • Pingback: » $7000 Fine for Sharing ‘WordPress For Dummies’ – Rare Default Judgement For Settlement Shakedown Publisher »

  • Pingback: What Happens If File Sharing Can Also Be Prosecuted As Trademark Infringement? – July 10, 2012 at 06:52PM | Lifestream

  • BTGuard - BitTorrent Anonymously

NewsBits

Even more news...

  • The Pirate Bay Isn’t Down Completely, Just Having a Few Issues

    Twitter and Facebook, not to mention the TorrentFreak inbox, are currently alive with complaints that The...

  • Pirate Bay Founder Gottfrid Svartholm on Freedom of Speech

    Freedom of speech is a highly valued commodity, but should people be allowed to say whatever...

  • Blu-ray Anti-Piracy Tech Stops Discs and Promotes Purchases

    An anti-piracy system present in all official Blu-ray players since 2012 has received a fresh update...

  • Foxtel Breeds Pirates by Locking Up Game of Thrones

    One of the main reasons why people turn to piracy is the lack of legal alternatives....

  • UK Student Admits Breaching Sony Copyrights With Leak of PS3 SDK

    Last year an Internet user known as El Nomeo leaked version 3.70 of Sony’s Playstation3 SDK...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

PopularArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.