TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

BitComet – A Bittorrent Client Stuck Behind a Language Barrier

For more than 7 years BitComet has been one of the most used BitTorrent clients, but also a piece of software with a doubtful reputation among users of competing clients. Many wild claims have been made against BitComet, with nearly no official response in English from the Chinese development team. Today we play catch up and find out how BitComet came about, what went wrong, and where the client is heading in the future.

bitcometWith 2.5 million daily users, BitComet is without doubt one of the most used BitTorrent clients. Although most of its users come from Asia, the client is also well represented in the West, with more than 100,000 daily users in both the US and UK.

In recent years BitComet has been adding many features that have taken it way beyond being a regular BitTorrent client. It now has a full featured HTTP/FTP download manager, a VIP downloading feature, and its own proprietary file sharing protocol which the developers call long-term seeding.

Despite the wide range of features that have been implemented, BitComet has remained largely undiscussed in the English speaking part of the Internet. One of the main reasons for this is that none of the 20-people strong development team speaks English. So today, after working with a team of translators, we aim to bridge this gap and unravel a few mysteries by presenting our discussions with BitComet founder RnySmile.

“In the beginning I was using another BitTorrent client developed in Python,” RnySmile says, commenting on his motivation to start developing BitComet.

“After running a torrent all night long I noticed my harddrive was running like crazy, grinding away as the torrent progressed and I wondered why the developers didn’t use a disc cache to prevent the constant need for repeated read/writes. This client also didn’t have the ability to download more than one torrent at a time.”

“So, being a C++ programmer, I began development on a new client initially called “SimpleBT”, which was originally designed to simply run torrents and introduced a disc cache as well as the ability to download multiple torrents. This project eventually grew to be much more than a simple BitTorrent client so we eventually changed the name to BitComet,” he added.

Today, BitComet has grown far beyond being a one man operation. The current BitComet development team consists of approximately 20 people, who are all from China. These developers are obviously skilled in what they do, but the inherent language barrier also has some downsides.

During the early years there were quite a few controversies surrounding BitComet, which resulted in a bad reputation among many English speaking BitTorrent users. Although RnySmile acknowledges that some errors were made in the past, he believes that many of the reported issues were the result of a lack of communication.

“The criticism and rumors about BitComet that circulated through the English-speaking torrent community were largely unknown to us, at least not to the extent they were known in the English communities,” he says. “Being that BitComet is a free software product we haven’t had the resources to operate a public relations department to service our international users, issue press releases and communicate with the media.”

Although BitComet now has English volunteers who help out users in their native language, this type of support was mostly missing in the early years. In China, on the other hand, it was easier for the BitComet team to address and respond to concerns. “We have always operated a forum in China where we post updates and users can communicate with members of the development team,” RnySmile says.

For many in the English speaking BitTorrent community, the lack of communication resulted in a bad reputation. It all started in 2005 when BitComet was banned from several private BitTorrent trackers for ignoring the “private flag” – a feature that keeps private torrents, private. Even though this issue was resolved relatively quickly, the image of BitComet was permanently damaged.

In the years to come, more and more horror stories popped up, from spreading junk data, to disobeying BitTorrent rules. In 2007, BitTornado developer Shad0w even went as far as banning all BitComet users, because the client allegedly exploited super-seeds.

Around the same time, however, Robb Topolski, a networking and protocol expert with more than 25 years experience, researched most of the claims against BitComet. He concluded that the client was not best suited for initial seeding tasks but at the same time refuted all other claims.

“BitComet is a worthy download client, providing some advantageous features not found in any other current BitTorrent client. Some of these features are confusing and are poorly implemented, but they are not detrimental to a BitTorrent swarm, nor do they take unfair advantage,” Topolski wrote.

“None of the typical accusations against BitComet, those that are provided as reasons for trackers or users to ‘Ban BitComet’ have held true. It is my professional opinion that the bans of BitComet are based on misunderstandings and falsehoods, and not on good data,” he added.

BitComet founder RnySmile agrees with this assessment, and in his full response (linked below) he addresses several of the rumors and misunderstandings in detail. Although the bad press was unpleasant, the BitComet team wanted to look ahead and create an universal download application that goes beyond BitTorrent.

“One thing we wanted to do was make BitComet into more than just a BitTorrent client. We wanted our users to be able to use one program to do all their downloading, no matter what the source of the files was, or the protocol used to get them,’ RnySmile said.

Among other things BitComet has introduced a feature called VIP-downloading which enabled user to download torrent that are accelerated by BitComet’s servers. It’s basically a private connection to a hight speed seedbox which speeds up the downloading process.

Another unique feature to BitComet is the proprietary file sharing protocol which the developers call long-term seeding (LT-seeding). With LT-seeding BitComet users can choose to keep on sharing files with other LT-seeders when their regular download is stopped. However, normal BitTorrent swarms will always have priority over LT-seeding.

Finally, BitComet is also planning to introduce an anonymity feature in the near future, but this is still a work in progress. The above, and integrating many other features that have been implemented over the years, is BitComet’s greatest accomplishment according to RnySmile. “It was a long, hard, and ongoing task to get these new features to all work together and develop a stable product.”

One thing’s for certain, BitComet is here to stay. Although it’s steering in a slightly different direction than most other clients, with some pretty unusual features, we feel that the BitComet team deserves more credit than it generally gets.

The full response from the BitComet team was too long to publish in its entirety but can be read here (pdf). We want to thank everyone who helped in getting this interview ready for publication, including RnySmile, The UnUsual Suspect, the BitComet development team, Lucy26, Kluelos, Cassie, GreyWizard and Vasy.

Related Posts

Previous Post | Next Post

  • Lime

    Why is the header “The Top 20 DMCA Cease and Desist Senders of 2010″? but links to torrentfreak.com/bitcomet-a-bittorrent-client-stuck-behind-a-language-barrier-110218/ ?? Perhaps a fix needed there

    • Anonymous

      I actually looked up to see who the writer was….
      Thought it would be enigmax.. His headings are somewhat dramatic.

      But ernesto wrote it… so it must be a mistake.

    • Anonymous

      Ok, I’ve fixed the title, slight mistake there.

  • Guest

    “The Top 20 DMCA Cease and Desist Senders of 2010″ you say?

  • Jeff

    I think you got your articles mixed up.

  • http://twitter.com/LoreleiMission Lorelei Mission

    Top 20 WhatNow?

    • http://crashsuit.blogspot.com crashsuit

      Top 20 TorrentFreak headline mixups. Also math mixups.

  • Pingback: Tweets that mention The Top 20 DMCA Cease and Desist Senders of 2010 | TorrentFreak -- Topsy.com

  • bootytape.com

    I like the article but the wrong title messes up the feel of the article though.

  • sandy

    I have found some huge forums in the past about Bitcommet. I saved them in bookmarks for future use. Will probably try bittyrant out and see if it can overtake my bittyrant client.

  • Anonymous

    um, where’s the linux version?

    • Axxe

      If you use linux, you should not use bitcomet anyway. Keep in mind that linux is all about community and Open source softwarse are the key to a good evolution of community based computing. But you may still try to run it with wine…

  • jack.ss

    From the PDF:
    “There is also a new plan under development currently, which is called
    Anonymous Download. When users are Anonymous downloading, they will
    only request pieces from our server, not from other peers in the swarm, hence
    their IPs will be protected by us, so they will not leave any trace of what they
    have downloaded. However, this plan is still in progress, it may take another
    couple of months to formally appear in the BT community.”

    That would be something :D

    • Vrwet

      already have oneswarm and freenet

      • jack.ss

        Oneswarm and freenet isn’t very fast, besides – maybe your nod is used by someone doing things you don’t want. But if it works for your needs, good for you.

        I have a VPN that I hardly use. VPN gives you a total Anonymous browsing. There is free VPN’s if you have luck like I had.

        I download most my stuff with 13000 kb/s and seed back to at least 1:1.
        Find a good private BT community and don’t HnR.

        I use to be an uploader on many sites, but now days I don’t do the open ones anymore, because 95% don’t seed back.

        Peace

    • JJ

      that’s called seedbox

      • jack.ss

        A very, Very big seedbox :D

  • anon

    That one quote by RnySmile is misleading; BitComet isn’t free software, it’s freeware.

    • The UnUsual Suspect

      The term “freeware” is an English term. This was translated from Mandarin Chinese, and I don’t see anything misleading about saying his software is free, which it is.

    • The UnUsual Suspect

      The term “freeware” is an English term. This was translated from Mandarin Chinese, and I don’t see anything misleading about saying his software is free, which it is.

    • The UnUsual Suspect

      The term “freeware” is an English term. This was translated from Mandarin Chinese, and I don’t see anything misleading about saying his software is free, which it is.

    • The UnUsual Suspect

      The term “freeware” is an English term. This was translated from Mandarin Chinese, and I don’t see anything misleading about saying his software is free, which it is.

  • http://twitter.com/mikkelpaulson Mikkel Paulson

    BitComet never ignored the private flag; one particular version (0.60) would resort to DHT under very specific conditions if the tracker went offline, even if the flag was set. During normal operation, the flag was respected.

    While this may still sound like a big deal, it would still require people to somehow get a copy of the metadata file (presumably without being a member), at which point they’d probably be duplicating another user’s passkey anyway, which would allow them to access the tracker without BitComet’s help.

    Classic private tracker paranoia.

    These days the main complaint with BitComet is that it creates a bunch of padding files when creating new torrents. While annoying, doing so does make it possible to selectively download some files without having to allocate those before and after as a traditional metadata (.torrent) file would require.

    Mikkel Paulson
    Leader
    Pirate Party of Canada

  • http://twitter.com/mikkelpaulson Mikkel Paulson

    BitComet never ignored the private flag; one particular version (0.60) would resort to DHT under very specific conditions if the tracker went offline, even if the flag was set. During normal operation, the flag was respected.

    While this may still sound like a big deal, it would still require people to somehow get a copy of the metadata file (presumably without being a member), at which point they’d probably be duplicating another user’s passkey anyway, which would allow them to access the tracker without BitComet’s help.

    Classic private tracker paranoia.

    These days the main complaint with BitComet is that it creates a bunch of padding files when creating new torrents. While annoying, doing so does make it possible to selectively download some files without having to allocate those before and after as a traditional metadata (.torrent) file would require.

    Mikkel Paulson
    Leader
    Pirate Party of Canada

    • leo

      Padding files on torrents is like zipping a 7z. It is nonsense and abhorrent.

    • leo

      Padding files on torrents is like zipping a 7z. It is nonsense and abhorrent.

    • The UnUsual Suspect

      The padding files are required for multiple and cross protocol downloading. They are also only used if the optional “allign piece boundary” option is enabled. When it is, a BitComet user can download some or all of the files from sources other then Bittorrent. In some cases it could even enable completion of an unseeded torrent, and then share the files with the swarm, saving a dead or dying torrent.

  • Jay

    Interesting article, even though I’ll probably never use BitComet.

  • Anonymous

    Back in the days before utorrent, BitComet was my client of choice. It was a great client and I’m sure it still is.

    • Rahul_roy_delhi

      hi i want to know that …how to download whole site at a time through bit torrent?
      it is downloading only a single file. my email>>>>>>>>rahul_roy_delhi@yahoo.co.in

      • haha

        Your question is so poorly worded that no one could possibly answer you, and all you’ve served to do here is get your email listed on spammers email lists.

        ps. Does this look like a support forum?

  • Szczoch

    Some time ago i was using BitComet but it was buggy, (but generally feature rich), i.e
    wasnt completing downloads 99% (repeating issue),
    after starting it was disabling internet connection for about a minute, i guess it was messing somehow with router,
    was starting very slow, even on modern laptop,
    and of course those anoying commercials

    Only thing i miss, comparing to utorrent, is folders presentation in BitComet.

    • The UnUsual Suspect

      There were some stability issues in versions .71 to about .8x, as RnySmile discussed in this interview, but the 99% problem you mention is usually a router problem where incoming packets have a block of data that “appears” to your router as an IP address and your router alters the data to match your Local IP address, making the packet fail hash check and be discarded. Disabling “Gaming mode” in your router usually fixes that problem. As for the router cutting out like you mention, this is usually symptom of a weak router that can’t handle the many simultaneousness connections bittorrent protocol uses. This was often compounded by users hacking their tcpip.sys file to bypass the limit of 10 half-open connection attempts per second. With a patched tcpip.sys file any bittorrent client could throw a huge number of connection attempts at your router far faster then the device can handle them, causing the device to reboot. Most of that problem was from a misunderstanding of what the limit actually was. The limit imposed when winxp sp2 was introduced didn’t limit how many half open connections you can have, it only limited how fast these connections can open, and a healthy system would open them at a rate of about 10 per second, and in most cases you will reach your target number in less then a minute, so even if the patch didn’t cripple your router or adversely effect your system, the very best speed increase you could hope for was less then one minute, usually far less, and in most cases (like yours), you end up slowing yourself down.

  • Tr_13t

    Bit-comet has taken alot of ridicule over the years from the west. But it hasn’t stopped the download engine from fading away. Go ahead – give er some more juice guys, this engine has alot more horsepower left in her. Cool idea about the anonymity. I wonder if my 100mb fiber-optic upload/download would slow down because of it…?

  • Anonymous

    Bitcomet became Adware many years ago and I stopped using it.

  • Truther

    An advertisement by any other name is just as useless.

  • Glib

    I still think that ALL torrent clients should be easily hacked to ignore the private flag. That stupid flag is just hindering sharing, it has no purpose whatsoever and forces me to use a flag-ignoring client for those specific torrents, which is lame.

    • The UnUsual Suspect

      The private flag is for private file sharing networks. If you wanted to share some files with your family, you don’t want to post them where anyone can download them do you? Thats the purpose of private trackers.

      Some are private communities where people share their files and others have open enrollment. In either case, your upload and download are measured and everyone is required to share what they download. If you don’t like private trackers, then there is no shortage of public trackers out there, so use one. However, a good private tracker will usually have the releases long before they get to public trackers and you usually get much better speeds. If a user just wants to download and not share, then they won’t be welcome, and in fact shouldn’t even be using torrents, which are designed for file sharing, not file downloading.

  • axxe

    There are better clients. Transmission, Deluge, QbitTorrent, Ktorrent, rtorrent, etc!

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_PFCI5VRUCYT6AVBT3P6ILV3COI Ophelia Millais

    BitComet felt like adware and bloatware to me since about 0.85. I gave up on it soon after, in favor of more basic clients. It’s too bad, because its torrent functionality really was quite good. That aspect of it never deserved the bad rep that has been the result of so much folklore among clueless private tracker admins who “heard somewhere” something about BitTorrent being a bad client and want to err on the safe side. A lot of people at the time just didn’t have a critical enough eye to read between the lines of Shad0w’s anti-BitComet rants, and the momentum of the BitComet backlash continues to this day. One such person who failed to take Shad0w’s claims with a grain of salt was Ernesto, author of this article we’re commenting on! Check out what he was telling the BT community here on TorrentFreak at the time: http://torrentfreak.com/bittornado-bans-all-bitcomet-users/

    “BitComet is known to be a BitTorrent bully…”

    “Recently, BitComet started to exploit the super-seeding procedure…This technique speeds up the overall speed of the swarm, and all other users benefit from it. However, not if it was up to the BitComet developers.”

    “The continuous efforts of the BitComet developers to cheat the system…”

    “People may question whether it is a good decision to ban all BitComet users, but I think it is a wise one. In general, BitComet users are not the sharing type…”

    “I’m with Shad0w on this, and I seriously hope that BitComet stops cheating, and will become more BitTorrent friendly in the future.”

    It’s nice to see TorrentFreak becoming a somewhat more neutral news site instead of just an op-ed blog, but if they really want to be taken seriously, then they’re going to have to develop an editorial policy to explain the inconsistent positions they take on things like this, even if it’s just to say “oops.”

    • The UnUsual Suspect

      Your forgetting one important thing when referring to Ernesto. He is a news reporter, not a technical analyst that is testing software. He reported on the claims of “The Shadow” (Mr. Hoffman, bittornado’s developer), not making claims of his own, simply reporting on the opinions of someone we all considered an expert.

      Newer reports from Ernesto show that Mr Hoffman’s claims were an err (note Rob Topolski tests). It’s also worthy to mention that Mr. Topolski was far to kind to Mr Hoffman in that Topolski publicly asked Hoffman to provide his data to backup the claims he made. Mr Hoffmans reply was that he wanted some time to “dot all the I’s and cross all the T’s before he sent it. Mr Topolski waited several weeks before proceeding without his data. It’s now going on three years and Mr Hoffman has provided no evidence to back up his claims.

      I don’t want to show any disrespect to Mr Hoffman, he is I’m sure a good person and probably meant well, but I believe he jumped to a conclusion and spoke out about a vague observation without doing any specific testing to backup his claims.

      I’ll also add that Mr Topolski’s claims have never been challenged and are widely accepted as factual. His tests even influenced RnySmile to incorporate superseeding into BitComet client, which has since renamed the feature to “Initial Seeding”, because there really is nothing “super” about it. In most cases it will slow down a torrent, not speed it up. Its only advantage is in conserving bandwidth. If a user is the first AND ONLY seeder on a torrent, he can get other peers upto 100% with less uploading with super/initial seeding enabled, but it may take much longer to do it. If your paying for bandwidth by measurement, then there may be an advantage, but if you want to get the torrent uploaded as fast as possible, and upload as much as possible, then you do NOT want to use superseeding.

    • The UnUsual Suspect

      Your forgetting one important thing when referring to Ernesto. He is a news reporter, not a technical analyst that is testing software. He reported on the claims of “The Shadow” (Mr. Hoffman, bittornado’s developer), not making claims of his own, simply reporting on the opinions of someone we all considered an expert.

      Newer reports from Ernesto show that Mr Hoffman’s claims were an err (note Rob Topolski tests). It’s also worthy to mention that Mr. Topolski was far to kind to Mr Hoffman in that Topolski publicly asked Hoffman to provide his data to backup the claims he made. Mr Hoffmans reply was that he wanted some time to “dot all the I’s and cross all the T’s before he sent it. Mr Topolski waited several weeks before proceeding without his data. It’s now going on three years and Mr Hoffman has provided no evidence to back up his claims.

      I don’t want to show any disrespect to Mr Hoffman, he is I’m sure a good person and probably meant well, but I believe he jumped to a conclusion and spoke out about a vague observation without doing any specific testing to backup his claims.

      I’ll also add that Mr Topolski’s claims have never been challenged and are widely accepted as factual. His tests even influenced RnySmile to incorporate superseeding into BitComet client, which has since renamed the feature to “Initial Seeding”, because there really is nothing “super” about it. In most cases it will slow down a torrent, not speed it up. Its only advantage is in conserving bandwidth. If a user is the first AND ONLY seeder on a torrent, he can get other peers upto 100% with less uploading with super/initial seeding enabled, but it may take much longer to do it. If your paying for bandwidth by measurement, then there may be an advantage, but if you want to get the torrent uploaded as fast as possible, and upload as much as possible, then you do NOT want to use superseeding.

  • Anonymous

    Interesting article indeed. I must admit I was swayed by all these controversies and misunderstandings, which resulted in that I decided to jump the ‘sinking’ ship.

  • Tom Wang

    Hello I’m a Chinese user. I don’t like BitCommet, but I have more reason to dislike Xunlei (Thunder), the No 1 BitTorrent client ( http://torrentfreak.com/thunder-blasts-utorrents-market-share-away-091204/ ).

    Xunlei is far worse than BitCommet, Xunlei and the Xunlei offline server are completely leechers damaging the community. Actually, even the controversial BitCommet cannot bear Xunlei, you guys bans BitCommet, and BitCommet bans Xunlei.

    I don’t care BitCommet, but Xunlei should be definitely banned. I think BitCommet developpers want to communicate with the other clients’ developpers, but the language barrier as you said, also their bad implement made them unacceptable. Maybe I can assume that they don’t mean it.

    But Xunlei is different, Xunlei company disdains to communicate with the other clients’ developpers, they make bigger money by leeching the other clients’ uploads. And since they are far from the non-Chinese developpers, they have better reputation than BitCommet and no non-China-based BitTorrent clients bans Xunlei, which makes Xunlei become the No 1 client in the world. That’s a ridiculous thing.

    • Kirkpad

      If you are in a community with a private tracker, then that data doesn’t apply to you. Xunlei is the No 1 client in the public torrent world, not the private torrent world.

      Of course, the amount of people using uTorrent privately might not beat those huge numbers.

      • Tom Wang

        Xunlei is not regularly used but it seems that it can access the private trackers? I’m not sure. Anyway if so, it is easy to ban xunlei by the private trackers. There is no place for Xunlei in the private torrent world. Xunlei developpers know it, they focus on the public one, making their empire in it.

        So IMO, BitComet v0.60 violates and the other version are OK, while all versions of Xunlei violate and leech in the public (possibly also private) torrent world and the eDonkey network. Sure it is good to not to use them both, especially Xunlei.

        • Jack Ss

          I’ve never seen Xunlei on any of the private sites I use. To access a private tracker you need a passkey, and even with one, the trackers have a ban on tracker level.

          If you see a Xunlei on a open tracker you could always use the peer block :D

  • merethan

    “…and I wondered why the developers didn’t use a disc cache to prevent the constant need for repeated read/writes.”

    You used the wrong operating system, Sir.

  • Anonymous

    Wow, never thought about it liek that before, makes sense.

    being-anon.eu.tc

  • Pingback: BitComet – A Bittorrent Client Stuck Behind a Language Barrier | PornDL News

  • anadmin

    Several BitComet ‘features’ caused trackers to ban BitComet:
    - Ignores private flag
    - Doesn’t report completion percentage properly (skip === downloaded)
    - Introduced viral like ‘padding files’
    - Hurts swarm efficiency (disputed?) / promotes hit-and-run leeching

    Bad reputation my ass. Bad morals, bad programming, bad client.

    On top of that, I think it also had ads. Overall the client was really bad.
    The interview just shows they’re just doing stuff without direction. This holds for most big name clients these days though, sadly including uTorrent. I liked it best when it was at version 0.5 or something and no one knew about it.

    And yes Xunlei is worse, and thus banned on all private sites (that I know of)

    • Well…

      “Ignores private flag” – A bug exclusive to v0.60, which was withdrawn quickly. The bug has never resurfaced, yet the myth persists. See the Topolski report.

      “Hurts swarm efficiency (disputed?)” – Refuted by the Topolski report.

      “promotes hit-and-run leeching” – A vague and baseless accusation. Such user behavior is both possible and commonplace regardless of client. Besides, leechers are not criminals. I’m grateful to whoever is participating in a swarm, seeder or not. All they need is pieces I don’t have.

      “Doesn’t report completion percentage properly” – Debatable. As per the Topolski report, what was originally claimed regarding this was false, and as for the ‘completed’ message sent to the tracker, the BitTorrent spec is unclear on what’s expected. There’s no way to tell the tracker you’re skipping files. Sending ‘completed’ is the only way to announce that you’re not going to be downloading any more, which seems reasonable and exactly what the tracker needs to know, even if that’s not what other clients do.

      Padding files – They’re harmless, they enable a swarm health-promoting feature which more clients should support (getting pieces from non-BT sources), and they are only created by default when creating a torrent with v0.85. Since it only affects BitComet-created torrents and no one is truly forced to download the extra files, it’s no reason to ban the client entirely. Banning padding-file-containing torrents, maybe, but not the whole damn client! And the files are only an annoyance due to shortcomings of BitTorrent in general—you have to devote space & bandwidth to every file in the torrent, or you and the swarm don’t get the benefits of you being a seeder. Thus we all feel pressure to download, keep, and share lots of files we have no need for, be they padding files or real ones which were deliberately made part of the torrent.

      • anadmin

        > I’m grateful to whoever is participating in a swarm, seeder or not. All they need is pieces I don’t have.
        Not true, they ‘drain’ swarm capacity which just hurts overall speed.

        > Sending ‘completed’ is the only way to announce that you’re not going to be downloading any more.
        True, but the tracker can not distinguish between valid completion percentages and buffed percentages. It is for instance not uncommon for a torrent to have 5 seeders and 500 leechers where nearly everyone is around 20%. What the hell happened there? Well guess what: 4 of those seeders are BitComet users who just downloaded one file. This gives a very ‘cheaty’ feel to it. And again, this implementation is just not in the best interest of other people.

        > Padding files
        Now these are truly evil. They’re absolutely not harmless. It’s a shameless plug. The padding files say something like “this is a padding file, use BitComet x.yz or higher to hide them”.
        I definitly see the use of padding files (it’s quite brilliant actually) but it should be standardized. Not a shameful plug.
        Padding files only solve one part of the problem though, I’ve seen more elegant solutions; such as hosting (small) non-essential files on a separate persistent filehost.

        My point is that it’s not just the private flag that is a problem for BitComet. It’s just their overall mentality and their infallibly ability to choose the worst of two evils when implementing non-specified behavior.

        Look up “Dark patterns”.

        • Zdj

          Wow you’re an idiot

        • Zdj

          Wow you’re an idiot

        • Vasy

          Any new peer is brings good news to any swarm just by being there, downloading and uploading to the highest bidder. 90% of your download comes from other leechs like you, not seeds. All this and more is written in the bittorrent spec. You “have” read the specs, right?
          Are we supposed to just take your “professional” opinion as is? You must be joking, or to translate all this for less tech savvy people, PICS OR IT DIDN’T HAPPEN.

  • BoSNiaN

    I am an english user, and BitComet is what I used when I first got into torrents (from an asian friend). It was great, and I really held off other clients until 2009 or so when utorrent got really, really popular.

  • http://twitter.com/techlooser Tech Looser

    I actually never bothered to use the program. Was too happy with Transmission. I guess ill give it a try. Lets see if its available for my version of Linux.

    regards,
    http://techlooser.com

    • Anonymous

      Transmission Devs are getting kind of lame, though. Especially in terms of adding new features. It’s been how long since the freaking Mac version had labels. GTK version is still waiting for labels!

  • Spam Me Pls

    BitComet was my favorite client several years ago, but I ditched it after the “private tracker” brouhaha and a new lightweight client (do I even have to say its name?) came on the scene. BC was faster and snappier than Azureus, it was more feature rich than Ping Pong ABC, had torrent queue-ing which Bit Tornado didn’t, was actively being developed unlike bURST.

  • Nathan

    BitComet was my first ever BitTorrent client way back in 2004, so it has a special place in my heart, but I have since moved on.

  • Det

    I can not believe the FileHippo/AppHit incident wasn’t mentioned here [1]:

    As of April 2008 FileHippo will no longer be updating BitComet. As they have copied the FileHippo site text, files, images and update checker and are passing it off as original work. We recommend you use a different more reputable torrent client such as uTorrent.

    [1] = http://www.filehippo.com/download_bitcomet/

    • The UnUsual Suspect

      Every application, feature, plugin and website BitComet developers make carries the “Comet” brand name. If someone has a problem with AppHit, they need to address that to AppHit, not blame other unrelated companies that use the service.

      BitComet cannot and will not speak for AppHit, and FileHippo has no business making unfounded claims against BitComet. If they can prove AppHit stole something from them, then take appropriate action, don’t attack everyone that uses it. Their claims convinced me not to use FileHippo.

      • Det

        Oh, what an honor. A response from a BitComet developer/employee/employer. Well, I’d appreciate if what you said wasn’t full of sh*t so you might wanna maybe go for another try?

        As even you guys can clearly see how both sites, http://www.apphit.com [1] _and_ http://www.bitcomet.com [2] are owned by the same ISP, “SoftLayer Technologies Inc.”, the are located in the same city, Dallas (U.S.) and they are even (*cough*) located in the same postal code.

        AppHit is a clear copy of FileHippo with just a few modifications, including listing BitComet as the most popular download – which I suppose it never even has been.

        The fact that you’re even defending (or at least trying to) this situation is just proving how you don’t even want to answer for what you’ve done.

        Sorry, but you lose. The only thing you can now hope for is that nobody has seen my previous comment nor this one (or that they suddenly won’t end up finding out themselves – the internet is quite a big place anyway and you guys alone just can’t spread your lies all that well).

        [1] http://geo.flagfox.net/?ip=67.228.31.175&host=www.apphit.com
        [2] http://geo.flagfox.net/?ip=74.86.101.115&host=www.bitcomet.com

        ps. Please go f*ck yourself.

        • The UnUsual Suspect

          Every fact I posted is 100% true. What you said is unimportant, and unworthy of a reply, except to say that I’m not employed by, and don’t work for BitComet, which if you did your homework is located in China, not Texas??? wtf?

        • Det

          Sure, that’s what you say.

          The _ISP_ is located in Dallas, though, so what I said for that part was wrong.

      • Det

        Oh, what an honor. A response from a BitComet developer/employee/employer. Well, I’d appreciate if what you said wasn’t full of sh*t so you might wanna maybe go for another try?

        As even you guys can clearly see how both sites, http://www.apphit.com [1] _and_ http://www.bitcomet.com [2] are owned by the same ISP, “SoftLayer Technologies Inc.”, the are located in the same city, Dallas (U.S.) and they are even (*cough*) located in the same postal code.

        AppHit is a clear copy of FileHippo with just a few modifications, including listing BitComet as the most popular download – which I suppose it never even has been.

        The fact that you’re even defending (or at least trying to) this situation is just proving how you don’t even want to answer for what you’ve done.

        Sorry, but you lose. The only thing you can now hope for is that nobody has seen my previous comment nor this one (or that they suddenly won’t end up finding out themselves – the internet is quite a big place anyway and you guys alone just can’t spread your lies all that well).

        [1] http://geo.flagfox.net/?ip=67.228.31.175&host=www.apphit.com
        [2] http://geo.flagfox.net/?ip=74.86.101.115&host=www.bitcomet.com

        ps. Please go f*ck yourself.

      • Det

        Yeah, and you even *Like*d your own post – twice. Talk about running out of options, eh?

        • Vasy

          Employment? Ha! We’re volunteers. He has done more for BitComet than your president is doing for you and we respect him.

          But you sure sound like a pro at throwing mud on others to promote yourself, sir. Isn’t that a powerhouse, at selling high?

          If your neighbor sells nukes should you hang too? Let God sort ‘em out, right?

          It’s not possible to own two companies in China, not out of freeware anyway
          And the term you used, “owned by an ISP”, is outright wrong and misleading. A provider is just a provider, no matter who’s the client.

        • Det

          Lol. FYI I don’t live in the USA.

          Anyways I’ve asked FileHippo of how they got the idea that BitComet and AppHit are owned by the same guys. If they can’t prove it, I might start believing you guys.

        • The UnUsual Suspect

          I’m glad to hear you say that.

          The only facts I can tell you is that the developers of BitComet first heard of this from me in 2010, about two years after the claim. I can also tell you that there are two issue involved here.

          1. Did AppHit steal intellectual property from FileHippo? As of yet, I’ve seen nothing except FileHippo’s very vague claim, which I can’t really accept as fact because of the assumption that it was BitComet that did it.

          2. Does BitComet own AppHit? The answer to this is No. If you’ll look deeper into what BitComet has developed, there are dozens of projects, some successful, some not, many websites, blogs, forums and such, and every one of them has the common “Comet” theme. There was AtComet, MComet, BitCometBlog, CometPlayer, (suffice it to say the list is extensive).

          Anything further I say on this matter is speculation because my only connection to BitComet is to support it’s English speaking users and my communications with development are on Technical subjects necessary for myself and our forum volunteers to offer support. I don’t have the need nor desire to get involved in any legal disputes, but with that said, BitComet began using the AppHit service and integrated it into BitComet, much like it has integrated other products/services in the past. When I reported filehippo’s claims to the development team last year, they correctly decided that such a claim would need to be addressed to apphit, and as it was, it could not be given more credibility then any forum or blog post, so to simply end a very successful business relationship over this was premature.

          I have to agree with them.

          ps. thank you for keeping an open mind

        • The UnUsual Suspect

          I’m glad to hear you say that.

          The only facts I can tell you is that the developers of BitComet first heard of this from me in 2010, about two years after the claim. I can also tell you that there are two issue involved here.

          1. Did AppHit steal intellectual property from FileHippo? As of yet, I’ve seen nothing except FileHippo’s very vague claim, which I can’t really accept as fact because of the assumption that it was BitComet that did it.

          2. Does BitComet own AppHit? The answer to this is No. If you’ll look deeper into what BitComet has developed, there are dozens of projects, some successful, some not, many websites, blogs, forums and such, and every one of them has the common “Comet” theme. There was AtComet, MComet, BitCometBlog, CometPlayer, (suffice it to say the list is extensive).

          Anything further I say on this matter is speculation because my only connection to BitComet is to support it’s English speaking users and my communications with development are on Technical subjects necessary for myself and our forum volunteers to offer support. I don’t have the need nor desire to get involved in any legal disputes, but with that said, BitComet began using the AppHit service and integrated it into BitComet, much like it has integrated other products/services in the past. When I reported filehippo’s claims to the development team last year, they correctly decided that such a claim would need to be addressed to apphit, and as it was, it could not be given more credibility then any forum or blog post, so to simply end a very successful business relationship over this was premature.

          I have to agree with them.

          ps. thank you for keeping an open mind

        • Vasy

          I never said you do. USA did not invent ignorance.
          I’m happy to see you start questioning one of the things you take for granted. It’s a good start.

  • Anonymous

    ( http://www.yessoso.com )

    We specialized in the exportation of sport shoes and other products

    (clothing, bag,sunglasses,watches,belts,etc )which have great enjoyed

    popularty in the world market Many of our goods are on sales ,we can

    guarantee the crediblity by Pay-pal and delivery time .we would like to

    make a long termship.

    1)Name : The perfect gift.

    2)Grade : AAA+

    3)Package : in original boxes

    4)Color : various

    5)MOQ : 1 pc

    6)Payment : Pay-pal/Western Union / Credit card/Moneygram

    7)Ship-ping : 4-7 days with guarantee of customs clearance, drop shipp-ing

    is accepted to customers’demands.

    8)Who-lesale: very low price, you can make a small order first to test

    quality and service.

    ( http://www.yessoso.com )

    Online Contact . thank you.

  • reedit

    Why you bother to use BitComet ? use uTorrent for windows or rTorrent for Unix.

    http://www.getaseedbox.com/

  • BTGuard - BitTorrent Anonymously

NewsBits

Even more news...

  • The Pirate Bay Isn’t Down Completely, Just Having a Few Issues

    Twitter and Facebook, not to mention the TorrentFreak inbox, are currently alive with complaints that The...

  • Pirate Bay Founder Gottfrid Svartholm on Freedom of Speech

    Freedom of speech is a highly valued commodity, but should people be allowed to say whatever...

  • Blu-ray Anti-Piracy Tech Stops Discs and Promotes Purchases

    An anti-piracy system present in all official Blu-ray players since 2012 has received a fresh update...

  • Foxtel Breeds Pirates by Locking Up Game of Thrones

    One of the main reasons why people turn to piracy is the lack of legal alternatives....

  • UK Student Admits Breaching Sony Copyrights With Leak of PS3 SDK

    Last year an Internet user known as El Nomeo leaked version 3.70 of Sony’s Playstation3 SDK...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

PopularArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.