TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

BitTorrent Traffic Booms Due to “Licensing Challenges”

In the U.S., BitTorrent’s share of total Internet traffic is falling sharply and the aggregate share of all P2P sharing applications is now at an all-time low of 12.7 percent. In other parts of the world, however, this trend is noticeably absent. In Europe and the Asia-Pacific region BitTorrent continues to surge. In part this difference can be explained by the lack of legal alternatives.

Over the years we have been following various reports on Internet traffic changes, specifically in relation to BitTorrent. One of the emerging trends is BitTorrent and P2P traffic as a whole losing its share of total Internet traffic, in the U.S. at least.

This downward spiral is confirmed by a recent Sandvine report which reveals that BitTorrent traffic is now responsible for 11.3% of all U.S. Internet traffic during peak hours, compared to 17.3% last year. Although these numbers don’t take into account that absolute traffic has increased, it’s clear that there’s little to no growth in BitTorrent use.

However, this decline appears to be unique to the U.S. When we look at other regions a different pattern can be observed.

In Europe for example, BitTorrent traffic still accounts for 20.32% of all Internet traffic during peak hours, while eDonkey adds another 9.39% to the P2P total. During the last 18 months the share of P2P traffic nearly quadrupled, and this increase is even larger in absolute traffic.

According to Sandvine, the absence of legal alternatives is one of the reasons for these high P2P traffic shares.

“We see higher levels of P2P filesharing than in many other regions, at least partially due to geographical licensing challenges that restrict the availability of legitimate Real-Time Entertainment services.”


Europe: Internet traffic during peak hours

europe

A similar trend is visible in the Asia-Pacific region where BitTorrent now accounts for nearly half of all upstream traffic and 27.19% of the aggregate Internet traffic during peak hours. The P2P streaming service PPStream and the Chinese file-sharing client Thunder add another 6.36% and 4.62% to the P2P total.


Asia-Pacific: Internet traffic during peak hours

asia pacific

So, while BitTorrent traffic is stabilizing in the U.S. as its share of Internet traffic drops, the P2P protocol is still hugely popular in other parts of the world.

Sandvine’s suggestion that a lack of legal alternatives is one of the explanations for this seems plausible. As we reported earlier this week, the latest episodes of series such as Game of Thrones are widely pirated on BitTorrent in countries such as Australia and the Netherlands due to airing delays.

In the U.S. on the other hand, the availability of legal content has flourished in recent years. To illustrate this, Sandvine reports that one-third (32.9%) of all downstream traffic during peak hours is now generated by Netflix subscribers. In addition, Hulu has doubled its share in the last year to 1.8%.

The above seems to suggest that due to these alternatives, people are less inclined to pirate.

The MPAA is slowly starting to realize that consumers are not all out to steal content, they simply want to consume.

“I believe it’s critical to find solutions to the challenges facing both these consumers and the people who create the content. Because at the end of the day, this discussion is about consumers and by consumers who love TV shows and movies. They want to be able to access them quickly and safely online,” the MPAA’s Marc Miller wrote yesterday.

True words, but Miller continues with a classic misunderstanding. “No business in the world can compete with ‘free’,” he notes.

As it turns out, the entertainment industry can definitely compete with free, up to a certain point. The crucial part is to remove all the artificial barriers. Release delays for TV and movies drive people towards BitTorrent piracy, just as DRM is an incentive to pirate rather than a deterrent.

The challenge for the entertainment industry in the years to come is not to invent ways to stop piracy but to make it less attractive, by ensuring that consumers get timely access to the content they want independent of their location, and on demand.

Related Posts

Previous Post | Next Post

  • Nil By Mouth

    One of the main challenges for the ‘entertainment industry’ is to stop treating us as ‘consumers’ and return to the original view of us as ‘customers’. Perhaps then they’ll learn to respect that we choose to give them our custom and stop treating us as though we’re some vile disease to be eradicated.

    • Guest

       Agreed and pains me to see iTunes even on the list.

      World’s most popular and expensive piece of malware is what it is.

      • Cult cassic

        Cant argue with that…. Personally I cringed when I saw it there.

        • Load… load…

          Megaupload is missing :(

        • kripk

          megaupload was HTTP anyway.

        • Anonymous

          my friend’s aunt made $17398 the previous week. she is making income on the internet and bought a $578000 house. All she did was get lucky and try the steps written on this website===>> ?????? http://job2seek.blogspot.com

      • Anonymous

        Get it===>>> lot of fun, love and enjoy here.. http://www.year13.com.au/????????

      • Anonymous

        No, windows XP and Vista still own that claim.

        • Revan343

          *Vista and 7

          FTFY

      • http://lazycash1.com/ Anonymous

        my friend’s aunt made $17398 the previous week. she is making income on the internet and bought a $578000 house. All she did was get lucky and try the steps written on this website===>> ?????? http://job2seek.blogspot.com

    • YaGoho

       us bittorrent traffic dropping due to use of foreign vpn’;s duuh

    • DeathAngel

      Ya right! My ass!  Whoever believe Sandvine is an idiot. .These guys are trying to sell their deep packet inspection shitty gear by  trying to convince the corporate parasites that it does something useful for them.

      Talk about a load of BS. Even if this was true it will still not make us come back as customers any way. All these low life form can die. We are not entertain.

      Ok  I have stuff to upload and download now.

      Tchaoo!!!!

      • Wes

         Asia Pacific why are you not on the edonkey network more? Its a great network.

    • No1_2_u

      I agree.

      3 years ago I cancelled my cable TV subscription & started downloading all of my entertainement. My Internet package is huge & costs a lot but, I get to create my own “TV packages” from ALL over the world; no cable TV packages can do that.

      I get to watch what ever I want, whenever I want w/ no commercials; I am now an Internet customer & not a *insert penis enhancing, soap, beer, car…advertisement* potential consumer/brain-dead-zombie-customer…

  • http://twitter.com/p2jack Jack

    Nice stats, I do think if there were free and legal ways to watch movies I would. And I also think a lot less would pirate, and more rent, if movies came out in the UK the same time as the US. Why do they get DVDs 4 months before us…

    • Sparrow

      I wouldn’t. I would pirate just as much. Lets say there was a site, similar to IMDB, with a huge movie collection, with trailers and info, ratings and reviews, and I could DOWNLOAD the movie (instead of stream, because streaming is retarded) through a fast un-throttled link, through a protocol similar to BitTorrent, and I would have to pay only 1$ per movie, or a monthly fee with no restrictions to do with the content I download as I please. And lets say that site would have the latest movies/tv shows out available everywhere in the world the same day it is shown in theaters/aired on tv, I still would opt for piracy. But I’m sure if there was such a site several things would happen:
      A. The people behind the site would make truck-loads of money.
      B. People would pirate a lot less.
      C. Piracy would be even easier than before, as cam rips would become a thing of the past.

      • Guest

        Why would you still pirate? You give us a bad name.

        • Sparrow

          Who is “us”? Are you saying a pirate is giving pirates a bad name? Don’t be silly. I’m not bound by moral issues nor guilt when it comes to piracy. As to why I would still pirate, that’s easy to explain; If somebody offers you a sandwich for $1, and offers you another sandwich, that is exactly the same, for free, tell me you would pay $1. Furthermore, the guy giving you the choice is a millionaire. Why would you pay? Lets go EVEN FURTHER, and say you have a pretty low income, and that $1 is better spent on something important. Why would you pay?  I choose not to pay, simply because I don’t feel any obligation to. There is no loss. There is no damage. There is no reason not to pay. 

        • Sparrow

          Also got hungry and thus distracted while writing that. The last sentence should of course read “No reason to pay” not “no to pay”. Silly me. 

        • Guest

          I’d always buy the $1 sandwich if it tasted great and I knew the $1 went to the person who made it. 

        • Anonymous

          I think you have a point:  Using Sparrow’s logic neither the original Creative Artist, Nor any other person necessary to the production of a piece of Intellectual Property is ever to be compensated.  As Filesharers we make a public appeal for acceptance and support in opposition to the existing Copyright Monopoly by framing our arguments and our conduct on the basis of Fairness: We refuse to pay a monopoly premium because it is unfair legislatively protected public extortion.  We refuse to allow corporate digital distributors to remain the primary recipients of the marginal value underlying Intellectual Property because in the digital universe they are Zero cost economic parrasites who are abusively compensated at the expense of Creative artists and Consumers under the existing copyright regime.  We refuse to accept a hundred year term for Copyright because as an effective perpetuity it abolishes the rights of citizens under Public domain. 

          All of these are winning arguments based on fairness. 

          The alternative argument, based on opportunity and pure power (we should Baptize it Sparrow’s argument), is a losing argument for Filesharers:  If you want a sense of the extent to which this argument (“There’s no need for me to pay!”) is a self defeating argument, try to imagine that we have collectively hired Sparrow to lobby against PIPA, SOPA, ACTA, CISPA, and TPP and that next week he will be spending twenty minutes with every Senator and Congressman in the American legislature making precisely THIS argument. 

          Would it surprise you to hear subsequently that all five of these laws had been unanimously passed as constitutional ammendments?    

          Imagine further that you’ve just heard on the news that Kim Dotcom  has fired his legal team and will in furure be represented before the court by none other than Sparrow, using the Sparrow Defense, ”I Choose not to pay simply because I feel no obligation to.” 

          Do we hear the judges ruling unanimously that the Fat Boy is a “Mutha Fucking Thief”? 
           

        • Billw58

          I think the point to be learned here is: speak only for yourself; stop trying to lump everybody together under a single banner as if everyone chooses to do what they do for the same reasons.

          Let me tell you, a huge portion of torrenters out there don’t give a shit about the politics/morality of it all.  Readers here represent only a very small fraction of those who torrent.  Stop acting like you speak for everyone, because you don’t.

        • PoorPeople

          Because I am poor. I barely can afford to pay for the internet.  So, I would never buy or I ever will be a consumer.  Free downloading push me to be a consumer of the internet.  So, you and the greedy copyright holder should be glad I help contribute to the economy by paying for the internet.  So, there is no damage and loss.

      • Alexander D.

        I think you are missing the point. People is actually willing to pay, but for a reasonable price and a service that’s up to todays digital standards. As the reality is so *** far from this, the only alternative that’s up to the expectation is piracy. On another side, The Entertainment Industry is a corrupt organization, for whom I’ve no sympathy nor feeling like supporting them, that means that from a moral point of view I’d rather not use their services* either. Perhaps in a not so far away world artists in the first place won’t sign with this corrupt and inefficient corporations, and when you buy a song you only support the artist & a small feed to the payment method. This may work great in the online world, but I’m not sure for example how the recording, selling of physical discs for example should be done. Granted these days the trend & the preferred format is digital (but you know grandpa ‘d still buy a disc). Also I haven’t seen digital* vinyl discs for sale.

        How it would be, “A World without Labels” perhaps that would make for an interesting article! or maybe it should be a world without restrictive licenses, such as free for personal-non commercial use? All the current system is based on the rights of the contents, that’s the legality* from where labels justify/base all of their abusive actions. Are there really strong or attractive alternatives to labels for a superstar? (just asking an example).

        PoorPeople,
        I don’t agree with your argument. Rather poor people
        simply can’t buy even if they want, because they can’t afford to. So with or without piracy they wouldn’t still be paying.

        Sparrow, no love for your favorite artists?


        Another idea, perhaps ISPs should sponsor, make a deal with VPN Services and offer them along with the main internet service. Here’s the interesting part: If everyone’s would use VPN, labels would be happy because there would be no piracy, the ISPs on the other hand wouldn’t have to defend themselves from labels threats, and people wouldn’t be trolled with legal threats / letters.


        And perhaps even more important than all of the above stated, is the government whom implements laws, and the judicial system that rules according to them (or that should!). I’ve seen US people complaining about their government, yet I haven’t heard of any strongh support to pirate party (It didn’t even made it in the TF article about PPs) !!! So yes ultimately US people has allowed this to happen…. and unlike
        other countries such as Germany, UK, The Netherlands, I see no strong support for an organized political effort to defend people rights aka
        pirate party in the US, or is there?

        • Alexander D.

          Trimmed by show more:
          …heard of any strongh support to pirate party (It didn’t even made it in
          the TF article about PPs) !!! So yes ultimately US people has allowed
          this to happen…. and unlike other countries such as Germany, UK,
          The Netherlands, I see no strong support for an organized political
          effort to defend people rights aka pirate party in the US, or is there?

        • Sparrow

          I don’t see how I missed “the point” about people paying if there is a good legal alternative to piracy. I did state that there would be a lot less of it under point B of my first reply. Regardless, what I wrote was my personal opinion of things. I know people are willing to pay, that’s rather obvious. I, personally, am not. I don’t listen to music, so there is no “artist” in that regard that I support. I also fail to see how, if everybody used a VPN, there would be no piracy. In fact, I’m pretty sure that more people would pirate with an increase of VPN usage, simply because they would feel more secure. There are (or used to be) ISPs that relied on VPNs. Their entire network would be built on a VPN. There is a pirate party in the US, read: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Pirate_Party

          But like I stated in one of my replies further down, we actually have similar opinions on this. The system the whole movie industry is built upon is utter garbage, and they will see no support of mine, nor do they need it.

  • http://twitter.com/Anime4PSP Anime 4 PSP

    And soon we will see copywrong trash bitching around that this is all because of their “great” policies and ppl went to legal alternatives

  • NumbersLie

    I wonder how many Americans have European or Asian VPN’s

  • Jason

    This just might be a good way to monitor the growth of vpn usage. Mine will report as Sweden.

  • Detuur

    True words, but Miller continues with a classic misunderstanding. “No business in the world can compete with ‘free’,” he notes.

    The problem is that it’s not free. In the US, you are more likely to end up paying millions of dollars for stuff that is supposed to free instead of spending it on legitimate material. It’s not a better service that drives people, or morality—it’s fear. Fear of MAFIAA ruining your whole life suing you for something they have no right to: the human nature and desire to share.

    • Waxcylinder

      Yep, fear certainly is a big part of people’s motivation, as it’s a highly effective control mechanism, which explains well enough why it’s so commonly used.

      Then there’s moral argument, another powerful tool over people’s thinking.

      • Anyone

        but sharing is the moral thing to do

    • Anonymous

      It’s more than just a “classic misunderstanding”. If you can’t compete with “free” I guess Evian went out of business the second the first soda streamer hit consumer households.

      Wait, you mean bottled water CAN compete with free tap water? Even in countries where the tap water is in fact better?

      Well, what do you know…I guess you CAN compete with free. That’s basic marketing 101. Brand name and convenience are and remain kings of the market. Miller can’t possibly be that ignorant.

  • Guest

    Correction:

    BitTorrent and P2P traffic as observable to Sandvine is losing its share of total Internet traffic, in the U.S. at least.

    VPNs and other anonymizing services take filesharers off the radar, so this “decrease” in U.S. filesharing traffic is pretty much meaningless. Is it because less Americans are filesharing, or is it because more Americans are obscuring their filesharing?

    With the rising popularity of VPNs and what not… I’d say it probably leans more towards the latter, though. 

    • Anyone

      you can observe traffic of VPNs in a swarm just fine

      it’s just that it can’t be traced back to your doorstep as easily

      • Mamma mia

        But he still has a point: Sandvine only monitors networks which have their boxes installed (mostly consumer/eyeball type of networks, not commercial/content type of networks).

        It’s highly likely that Sandvine’s statistics fail to account for VPNs, seedboxes, etc. because they’re not monitoring swarms directly: they’re doing DPI of selected (and therefore a biased/non-representative sampling of) networks.

        • Study is strange

          add to that….

          Have a DPI box sniffing your traffic == you go about normal interneting ?
          don’t think so.

          notable strangeness… (suggesting a mix of desperate data)
          Facebook and YouTube…..now a protocol ?

      • Anonymous

        Well yes and no. The point of a VPN is that the swarm doesn’t give you the real ip.

        If the VPN’s exit point is located outside of the US, what you end up with is that the torrenting done by US clients end up assigned to the torrenting going on from russia, Canada or the Netherlands.

        So the problem is really that sandvine is looking at crap data as far as determining US bittorrent use goes.

    • Nick Madeup

      For that reason it’d be interesting to see the percentage of unidentified traffic.

  • Lacus

    Marc is right though. Can’t compete with free.

    Even if I could afford it, and even if the quality of material improves, I’d still pirate. Because hey, why not? I’m not going to pay *insert amount of money here* for something that I could just as easily obtain for free.

    • Nil By Mouth

      You can quite profitably compete with free. If that wasn’t true, Apple wouldn’t be minted thanks to the iTunes Music Store. That you personally choose not to pay, doesn’t mean that you are representative of everybody.

      Some people will pay for stuff, because for those people the delivery channel may be more convenient than torrenting. Others, such as yourself, find torrents no less convenient than an eco-system like iTunes and as such freely choose to use that delivery method. The two can and do simultaneously exist quite harmoniously.

      There’s no reason to think that expanding the official paid-for channel options will be fruitless if the service provided is equal to or better than the free sharing options. Don’t forget that the people who buy the most also have a higher than average chance of being file-sharers (and vice-versa).

      The important point is that it should be about choice in the marketplace. You can choose to download for free or you can choose a competing paid-for option that doesn’t try to artificially restrict what you do with media you have bought (the way so many seem to do currently). The artificial restrictions make the ‘pirate’ service a better product.

    • Danny

      @e5015fe96721974ed918f4e4ce8deaae:disqus

      You definitely can compete with free. I am a netflix subscriber but I also torrent. Its the service of netflix that I like. I like the fact that its like an old video rental shop where I can browse lots of films I would not see otherwise, I’ve seen some great films on there I have never heard of. I pay for that service, sure if anything is not on there I download it but they are still getting money from me.

      Also I will quite happily pay £4 for a DVD in Sainsbury’s over downloading it from the net, the net is free but £4 is about fair for a DVD IMO.

    • fallacy

      You are happy to view an advert on a webpage to get the content ?

      You can still pay and get it for no monetary cost.

    • Anonymous

      Wrong. Most people want things easily and conveniently. Once it becomes easier to buy than fileshare you will start buying.

      Proof of concept? Bottled water.

      However, the above assumes you have confidence in the seller. Brand name is a must. One reason I won’t give a nickle to Sony is because I don’t trust those bastards with my credit card or any other personal information.

  • Guest

    True, true.
    Living in latin america I’d often  like to buy some of the stuff I pirate to support it and give them a reason keep doing good stuff like that but yeah a lot of stuff just isn’t out there or it’s only available on US IP’s or they try to sell it in euro outside of US and that’s no good.
    That’s the bad thing, good thing is that we don’t need VPN or anything here yet since for good or bad the media has forgotten about us.

  • http://www.twitter.com/echoman74 echoman

    It’s funny how they complain about shit! But without the Internet no one would know half of the movies and shows from around the world it’s called “discovery”. The reason bittorrent is so good is because it’s about discovery now if only these cop’rats thought like me and many others they’d see competing with free is not free at all.
    Be sure to contact me if you have questions lol.

     Money is money and regardless if i like it or others like it they’ll be more viewers money to make for every viewer is another .01 cent earned if you gather 10 million viewers from a profit or .01 cent you make 100000 bucks just out of those 10 million.

     If i remember and let me get this clear, if on television we watch free programming don’t those shows have advertisements etc?

    Because like i said “no Internet” no way of knowing about music, movies and television shows from around the world. Which give us the consumers customers and fans alike to become interested in anything.

    Mpaa/Riaa if you’re reading this get your heads out of your asses and start listening to the people the public and stop trying to be dictators entertainment is not law it’s entertainment for fucks sakes.

  • Whyallahwhy

    Sandvine reports that one-third (32.9%) of all downstream traffic during peak hours is now generated by Netflix subscribers. Why is that a good thing. So now Netflix will dominate the internet… Fuck Monopolies…

  • Pingback: Notrackingme | Proxy » Blog Archive » BitTorrent Traffic Booms Due to “Licensing Challenges”

  • Remo
  • Guest

    One additional reason for copying regardless of the availability of legal alternatives is  that money flowing to legal (mafia sponsored) services indirectly funds the ongoing war on privacy and sharing and the dismantling of the rule of law.

    (1) If 60 % moves from piracy to legal services, mmafia will say that they were right all along and that newer laws are still needed to force the rest 40 % into compliance.

    (2) Even if legal alternatives spring up, there is no chance in hell  that the mafia willingly  accepts scaling back of  the repressive antipiracy laws, retroactive copyright extensions, anticircumvention provisions,  strict liability rules merely for linking to infringing content and extradition of teenagers for linking to infringing content.

    Any economic support for legal services only serves to entrench the legal status quo and the copyright police state.

    (3) Going DRM free was never something the mafia did of its own willing.

    It was pulled kicking and screaming by the wave of piracy and newer tech upstarts like Apple.

    So yes, stopping pirating on the faulty assumption that we have “won” and should be satisfied with what we have got is shortsighted and counterproductive.

    But if you are not bothered by living in a copyright police state so long as you get cheap and legal (not free) stuff, you are in for a rude awakening.

  • Guest

    Guest wrote:
    “Why would you still pirate? You give us a bad name.”

    Because one may still object on principle to copyright law or copyright law being applied to non-commercial copying.
    If I have a natural right to copy for non-commercial personal use, it should not depend on seller’s price.
    One additional reason for pirating may be that one doesn’t like one’s money flowing to organizations trying to mess with internet freedom.

    Any money to RIAA or MPAA is money funding the assault on civil liberties and the expansion of the corporate police state.

  • Anonymous

    at the moment, the entertainment industries would like nothing better than to have BitTorrent declared illegal, simply because they dont control it and were far too slow to employ it. if they could get it banned, so much the better. if they ever did get to own it or even control what it could be used for, however, it would become an overnight sensation, the best invention since talking movies! what the hell they’re gonna do about the next file sharing innovation, God knows! heart attacks all round the board rooms, with a bit of luck!!

  • Guest

    Nil By Mouth wrote:

    “The important point is that it should be about choice in the marketplace. You can choose to download for free or you can choose a competing paid-for option
    that doesn’t try to artificially restrict what you do with media you have bought (the way so many seem to do currently). The artificial restrictions make
    the ‘pirate’ service a better product.”

    The artificial restrictions are those put in place by the coersive force of copyright law.

    The  availability of legal services does not remove the artificial restrictions from the market.

    Only abolition of laws against non-commercial copying will do, and paying the Mafia  for the privilege of obtaining stuf in legal ways guarantees that the repression will continue.

    • Nil By Mouth

      “The  availability of legal services does not remove the artificial restrictions from the market.Only abolition of laws against non-commercial copying will do”Oh absolutely. Couldn’t agree more, which is why I joined the PP.”paying the Mafia  for the privilege of obtaining stuf in legal ways guarantees that the repression will continue.”

      There are independents who you may want to give money to and ‘official’ channels could support these. We don’t actually need the MAFIAA organisations any more anyway – they were merely a cartel-controlled distribution conduit to the marketplace, but the internet has rendered them obsolete.

  • YARIGHT

    and the scene recently went as a standard to a x264 format that drops file size in half
    SO one could argue that 12.4 % is really no differant than 24.8% an actual increase…

    YES folks dont ya love numbers
    so cool isnt it getting a 350 meg tv ep as 200 meg or so….and that movie at 350-450 meg that used to be 700 -800 meg

    ahhh more more and getting it faster and i was doing this 9 years ago….ROFL
    so what will i move to that will be ten years ahead of you….

    im not telling

    • YARIGHT

      sorry let me get the stats form sandvine right
      This downward spiral is confirmed by a recent Sandvine report which reveals that BitTorrent traffic is now responsible for 11.3% of all U.S. Internet traffic during peak hours, compared to 17.3% last year.

      so 11.3X2 = 22.6 and it was 17.3 last year when all the file sizes were 40-50% larger….
      yup WINNING arent ya….

      • Anyone

        don’t trust any statistic that you haven’t forged yourself

        well spotted

      • Anonymous

        You can’t just multiply the percentages as the over all traffic would increase. But still, some 20% would be realistic – if no one is downloading apps, music and movies that is.

  • Mario Stargard

    Where’s usenet?

    • Anonymous

      Usenet is usually via encrypted traffic. I doubt it would even show – or it’s there as part of the SSL portion.

  • foff

    I am glad they believe their numbers.  I haven’t seen a drop in my downloading so go ahead and think that the paid alternatives make a difference.  Paid still does not compete with free.  1) The quality of streamed is fair at best.  2) The streamed stuff on netflix and hulu is not timely.  3) Watching anything with commercials now is torture,  I love watching something downloaded no commercials, no waiting, no endless trailers, just what you want to watch and nothing more and buffering problems ever.

    Just look at the value of facebook.  Advertising needs to come in the form of ads on a website not at the beginning or middle of a show.  The free tv model of cramming as many adverts into a hour around a show is dead in my world.  I will only put up with it in a hotel room or when I don’t want to bother to download a show and just want to veg on the couch but on a regular basis no legal alternative fills the bill yet. 

  • http://otester.myopenid.com/ PiRat

    Remind where most of the VPN’s are based…

    • Iygiwf

       shhhh!

  • YARIGHT

    i dont also see newsgroup use either….ROFL
    which has skyrocketed

    • Desu1

      And IRC. xdccfinder lists a lot of stuff!

      • lygiwf

         shhhh!!

    • lygiwf

       shhhh!

      • YARIGHT

        oh right lol

  • Anonymous

    How the hell do they even get numbers for these things?

    • YARIGHT

      they are spying on your internet use with deep packet inspection and other methods simular

  • Pingback: Anonymous

  • Anonymous

     http://bit.ly/KpDKUP

  • Admiral Ackbar

    HTTP is being constant. 

  • Ipodrx

    What about VPN traffic? Since the six strikes is eventually going to come in, wouldn’t a lot of bittorrent traffic be tunneled to other countries to continue using the p2p protocol.

    • Anonymous

      You said it. How much of the total internet traffic is under the “unclassified” heading of PPTP/IPsec/OpenVPN/L2TP encrypted protocols? Because anyone with a VPN won’t even show as using bittorrent when you look at the national figures.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100003477201404 Ian Musial

    Steam is excellent for games, go on Steam during Christmas and you can get games like Civ V, UT 3 BE, and Sim City 4k for like $3… not even joking.

    Also you can get refunds for full price (steam credit of course,) since they only refund the current price. :P

  • Sparrow

    @ThumbsUpThumbsDown:disqus 
    “There’s no need for me to pay” is not a self defeating argument, simply because the movie industry is rolling in cash. If we made the assumption that in order to keep the movie industry alive, everybody has to cash in, then yes, it would be. But as it stands, there is absolutely no NEED to pay. We’re not talking about lowly indie movies that nobody watches anyway (and I know lots of people claim to) because such movies don’t get the exposure a Hollywood blockbuster gets, and thus isn’t even relevant to piracy. Is there really a need for a “famous” actor to receive millions for a single acting job? If you believe so, you’re a fool. Just imagine if we lived in a world where people actually understood the value of money. No, I don’t feel any obligation to fund a 3rd villa for some already rich douchebag. No Mr. Actor, I don’t care about your “loss” and I shall continue to take what has been payed for tenfold and often hundredfold already. I also don’t feel like I should make arguments that a senate/congress would deem reasonable in order to not pass an unreasonable bill. I don’t need to hide behind fancy, confusing words just to avoid having a law passed in some random corrupt country that likes toying with the rest of the world. As long as the system the movie industry is built upon remains the same, I feel no obligation to pay a single cent.
    Obligation: something by which a person is bound or obliged to do certain things, and which arises out of a sense of duty or results from custom, law, etc.
    I feel absolutely no sense of duty to fund hollywood. It is a personal custom of mine to prefer free over paid. And there is no law that tells me I cannot copy a string of data on my PC. And even if there was, I feel no obligation to respect such a law, especially when all it results in is more money for more laws that I will not respect.

    • YARIGHT

      can you say that again fast?
      lol

  • Syn

    Easy beats Free.

  • Jesseicafischerqueen

     There’s nothing wrong with sharing a file period end of story.

  • http://www.alexseo.se/ Alexander Edbom

    And Bittorent traffic is also used for legal stuff, more often by Europeans than Americans as far as I know.

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/WZ56AQLBXK4SVP5HCZGLARBHI4 Elena

    what Kathryn responded I am inspired that a student can earn $8115 in 1 month on the internet. have you read this web site (Click on menu Home more information)  http://goo.gl/4Tviu  

  • Baba

    The lack of legal options is often underestimated and is in my opinion the main reason we now have such high piracy rates.

    If you consider how the sharing of digital media first became popular at the end of the 90′s you will see that the options for legal content were at first non existent, then when they did begin to show up they were expensive with a very limited selection of products and filled with usage restrictions and drm which meant that they were far inferior than a pirated version.

    If you want an idea of just how far behind technology the legal options are then you just have to look at how here in my country the streaming of movies and tv shows via netflix was only introduced at the start of this year. Previous to this your only realistic option for regular tv show viewing was to use filesharing.
    It has been almost 13 years since I could download a movie from the iternet using napster and only now a legal option to do the same is available. If the people in hollywood can;t see that this may be one of the factors in piracy then they really are a bunch of idiots.

    • HateThemAll

      Copyright assholders are so greedy, they even give Netflix problem.

  • Anon

    They are too late in realizing whatever they have realised ,They had a chance to give me what i wanted now i have found an alternative, that alternative does not have restriction is not necessary to stream and gives me all i want. They knew the reason people were sharing and they still sued them and tried to send them to jail. This is not my idea of a company i will ever support , ever. If they  offered high quality downloads at reasonable prices, like a $20 monthly membership fee and every show up to date as it was aired and every movie up to date as it was released on DVD i would still not use it now, why would i give my hard earned money to a company that totally refused to listen to there customers, the people paying to watch there content. There is nothing they can do to change my downloading habits now, they can wallow in there loss of billions of dollars  as i don’t think there are many that will give them the sympathy they will be asking for. Now if they had to release a free service with all of the above i might be interested, depends how long it takes for there high quality video of game of thrones was available on torrent sites, i would rather the torrent sites got the very small advertising fees than the arrogent ***** who will eventually try to suck up to us all saying they are sorry in there failed attempt to get the customers they abused  back. Call me a freetard a thief and parasite amongst many other colorful terms, and expect me to give you my money, right.!!!

  • http://twitter.com/SandovalStanley SandovalStanley

    just as Bryan explained I am amazed that someone able to make $6201 in 1 month on the computer. did you look at this page (Click on menu Home more information)  http://goo.gl/1ul81  

  • Anonymous

    Whatever they’ve done so far to stop piracy is an incentive rather than a deterrent:

    Putting DRM on music files, is an incentive for obvious reasons, however
    Everytime we insert a dvd / bluray, we cannot skip the fbi warnings and even sometimes the ads before accesing the menu to start the movie, by the time we get to that point we’ve already spent a lot of time, we feel disenchanted by this and dont want to watch the film anymore!
    This wont happen with downloaded files, where you dont get threatening messages and boring ads, you get only the main feature, and that is priceless

    • Anonymous

      I’ll expand that for you:

      1) DRM – incentive to purchase sanitized copy which works better, reads faster, and doesn’t screw with your OS.

      2) Regionalization – hype your product, release it in one country only while everyone in the rest of the world scrambles to download and watch what the fuss was all about.

      3) Obtain a completely useless block on filesharing sites which in effect generates a streisand effect, luring formerly uninterested internet users to watch and possibly start to download.

      4) Spew out insane hyperbole about how much the industry “loses” due to filesharing, convincing everyone that the industry representatives are all a bunch of lying twats.

      5) Publicly call for enforcement measures unseen even where terrorism and murder is concerned and which in essence results in the slack-jawed public having to watch as precious police resources are allocated for catching completely harmless teens filesharing from their homes rather than serious offenders.

      TL;DR – if the industry had shut up and adapted they would have saved themselves a few billion dollars in lobbying money and filesharing wouldn’t be as known an issue as it is today either.

  • jannamadden

    could you be using these websites? have you tried out these websites? http://pidyongsbestlist.blogspot.com/2012/05/most-useful-websites.html

  • Pingback: US BitTorrent traffic well down, but booming everywhere else | MyCE – My Consumer Electronics

  • http://openid.anonymity.com/1vmpr Anonymous

    Netflex.

  • Pingback: Tráfico de BitTorrent se dispara en Europa y en Asia | IntelDig

  • Eric Post

    Caps on ISPs have a lot to do with it

  • Eric Post

    All the Americans DL a TB of files have moved to vpn and seedboxes overseas

  • Test!

    It is absolutely unacceptable to demand
    consumers install proprietary software. I wish people would stop furthering these statistics until the industry improves on its behavior. Sadly the industry
    has lulled us into accepting it by making it easy to access without informing about the problems. The software and entertainment
    industries have the nerve to do some seriously unethical stuff. Apple lets you buy/rent content and then discontinues support for applications (iTunes) necessary to access said content (on older hardware). Sony has had the nerve to install rootkits onto consumers
    PCs and other malicious software. Microsoft bundles spyware and just
    about everybody forces you to connect for “activation”.

    We need to start saying no. There are
    companies out there who are making it possible to say no. One of them
    is ThinkPenguin. The company doesn’t sell hardware dependent on
    proprietary software and actively funds numerous distributions and
    free software projects. They make GNU/Linux seriously easy to use as everything is plug-n-play (“driverless”). The chipsets they use are in the mainline kernel and free software compatible (not dependent on proprietary drivers/firmware- most “Linux” hardware is not free software compatible and this is why users have problems). They are working with chipset manufacturers
    to ensure future availability of free software friendly hardware.

    It is companies like this that we need
    to get our money to. Another one I like is http://www.eztakes.com/.
    This small company lets you stream movies DRM-free. YES!

    However for those addicted to
    mainstream entertainment a simple search with Google comes up with
    all sorts of content for free. Just about every television show and
    movie are available for streaming. Most of the free sites have a lot
    of obnoxious advertising. I recommend installing Adblock Plus first.
    After that though it works great. Just search for content on Google.
    Type in the name of the movie/television show along with the
    following at the end: site:.eu

    Here is an example (non-existent tech
    show):

    GNU/Linux Tech Show site:.eu

    If you aren’t familiar with the Free Software Foundation or Trisquel I highly recommend getting to know them.These projects are all about freedom. Trisquel is a free distribution that doesn’t bundle Adobe Flash or provide easy access to non-free software. It ensures you won’t be supporting awful companies like Adobe, Microsoft, Netflix, Amazon, Hulu, and others.

  • http://astronerdboy.blogspot.com AstroNerdBoy

    The legal aspects aren’t playing nearly as big a role as Sandvine would like folks to believe. Were that the case, back when MPAA/RIAA were suing everyone they could left and right, combined with shutting down every file sharing site they could, they would have succeeded back then in KILLING file sharing. 

    In my opinion, the fact that there are FINALLY legal ways of getting content online is the main factor U.S. BT numbers are down.  In my opinion, most of us believe in financially supporting what we love.  However, as consumers, we want the content the way we want it…mostly (except for video games, where oddly enough, consumers have gone the other way to allow game companies to have it their way).

  • Ben

    Every time someone trots out the line “No business in the world can compete with ‘free’” the reply should be simply: “Bottled water”. 

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/XSMUVFIRPIYSVYWTX6Q4JNTPCM Gary

    just as Lois responded I cannot believe that a single mom can earn $4957 in a few weeks on the internet. have you seen this page (Click on menu Home more information)  http://goo.gl/YkCDm  

  • Anonymous

    As a society we have gone to great lengths to enable supply side economics, and I believe that we are entitled to expect that industry not artificially tamper with the full benefits thereof.

  • Anonymous

    As a society we have gone to great lengths to enable supply side economics, and I believe that we have a right to expect that industry not artificially tamper with the full benefits thereof.

  • Anonymous

    Free is easy to compete with because free is self-serve, zero customer service, zero quality control. That is why cheap is often better than free.

  • Pingback: Bit-torrent Traffic Booms Due to "Licensing Challenges" - Torrentfreak --Techbeast.netTechbeast.net

  • Anonymous

    lol Bit Torrent is jsut cool like that!
    Anon-Guys.tk

  • Pingback: BitTorrent genera più traffico di Youtube e Facebook in Europa | Tecnologia | BlogLive.it

  • Pingback: BitTorrent ????????? ???????? ???????? - ????????? ???????? =(

  • Pingback: BitTorrent Traffic Booms Due to “Licensing Challenges” | Mediafire Search Engine

  • Tad

    Once the cablecos implement “TV Everywhere” expect another surge in BT traffic. That’ll get rid of Hulu and a lot of other legal alternatives.

  • Pingback: BitTorent: U Americi drasti?ni pad ilegalnog skidanja datoteka, u ostatku svijeta postotak raste — Netokracija

  • Pingback: BitTorent: U Americi drasti?ni pad ilegalnog skidanja datoteka, u ostatku svijeta postotak raste | Croportal Magazin

  • Pingback: BitTorrent traffic drops in US, jumps in EU and Asia | t-break: Tech @ Its Fastest

  • Pingback: Il P2P è in calo negli USA ma in cresce in Europa

  • Anonymous
  • Pingback: BitTorrent Traffic Booms Due to “Licensing Challenges” | The Illuminati

  • BTGuard - BitTorrent Anonymously

NewsBits

Even more news...

  • The Pirate Bay Isn’t Down Completely, Just Having a Few Issues

    Twitter and Facebook, not to mention the TorrentFreak inbox, are currently alive with complaints that The...

  • Pirate Bay Founder Gottfrid Svartholm on Freedom of Speech

    Freedom of speech is a highly valued commodity, but should people be allowed to say whatever...

  • Blu-ray Anti-Piracy Tech Stops Discs and Promotes Purchases

    An anti-piracy system present in all official Blu-ray players since 2012 has received a fresh update...

  • Foxtel Breeds Pirates by Locking Up Game of Thrones

    One of the main reasons why people turn to piracy is the lack of legal alternatives....

  • UK Student Admits Breaching Sony Copyrights With Leak of PS3 SDK

    Last year an Internet user known as El Nomeo leaked version 3.70 of Sony’s Playstation3 SDK...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

PopularArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.