TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

Dotcom: Record Label Pressure Forced Mega Radio Ads Off the Air

In yet another twist in the incredible life of Kim Dotcom, the Internet entrepreneur has revealed that a set of ads to promote the launch of the new Mega this week have been canceled at the eleventh hour. Broadcasting company MediaWorks had been contracted to run several radio ads hundreds of times, but according to Dotcom pressure from recording labels has now resulted in MediaWorks backing out of the deal.

How much does it cost to run a worldwide advertising campaign for an soon-to-be-launched Internet company? We’ve done a few calculations and come up with the terribly scientific answer of “an awful lot.”

But while some companies undoubtedly spend tens of millions of dollars promoting the birth of their new cyber-babies, it can be done for much less with the right staff. If you want a prime example of getting the most bang-for-your-buck, look no further than the example set by Kim Dotcom.

Ever since he announced that Megaupload would be reborn as Mega, Dotcom’s words have been echoed around the world’s tech and mainstream press, creating millions and millions of pageviews and huge publicity at minimum cost. Nevertheless, even the mighty Kim Dotcom needs some exposure AFK, and to this end his company recently invested in some traditional advertising. Unfortunately, things haven’t gone to plan.

To publicize the launch of the new Mega this week, the company invested in a series of radio advertisements. The ads – featuring Kim Dotcom of course – were due to air on radio stations owned by MediaWorks New Zealand, a large local television, radio and interactive media company.

But this morning Dotcom delivered some bad news – the ads would no longer air as planned.

“Unfortunately Mediaworks pulled the plug on our radio ad campaign,” he explained. “Apparently some music labels complained to Mediaworks about our radio ads. Booking of over 500 ad plays terminated. Wow!!!”

Dotcom added that he isn’t holding MediaWorks responsible, describing the Auckland-based media company as having “great people”, but is instead laying the blame at the feet of his recording industry opponents.

“It’s the music labels that are abusing their power, again,” he said, while putting out a request for non-MediaWorks radio stations to contact him to do a deal.

In a comment to NZHerald, a MediaWorks spokeswoman confirmed the campaign had been pulled.

“For commercial reasons we are not playing the Kim Dotcom advert,” she said, declining comment on the exact reasons behind the decision.

This is the second time that perfectly legitimate business efforts to launch the new Mega have come under attack. Last year the first choice Me.ga domain name was seized by the government of Gabon acting under external pressure to punish Dotcom.

Ever resilient, Mega will now launch under the “lobbyist-proof” Mega.co.nz.

Related Posts

Previous Post | Next Post

  • Amigo Torrentz

    For commercial reasons we are not playing the Kim Dotcom advert,” she said.
    MediaWorks probably knows their own best interests, thats all. Kim just want to be victimized – as usual dot cum.

    • Andrew me

      Butt hurt much, lol…are you one of the shills as anyone looking at this and thinking it is ok in any way must work for the old music industry or hate the fact that artists are going to be making real money from there content now, and yes the music industry that is doing this is the old industry, Mega is going to show everyone that there is a more profitable way to make money from your content.
      I am sure that Mega could take legal action here could he not , they are stifling competition in an illegal manner using there monopoly and probably blackmailing them to not air the adverts.
      But i suppose destroying them will be more than enough for Kim. I cannot wait for his site to start up, and i am spreading the word to everyone i know in real life and on the internet.The day it opens twitter is going to be bombarded with messages…let the old music industry deal with that…

    • Guest

      How is advertising a legitimate buisness self victimizing? Also, I can see you’re a very /mature/ person, the way you talk. Y’get your humor from 4chan.

    • Anyone

      500 ads surely was quite a bit of money
      just goes to show how desperate the MAFIAA are when they can match that with a larger bribe

      • Seltox

        Chances are there larger bribe was something along the lines of “If you air those ads, we won’t let you use the music of our signed artists.”

        • Guest

          eah, more thtions should start telling the music industry to F off and start playing the music of unknowns. There is plenty of music out there for them to pick from. Why do they even pay artists? They should be glad they’re playing there music out of all the choice.

    • Guest

      Looks like the MAFIAA can’t even afford literate trolls now :(

      • Guest

        What did you expect? All their money went to bribe the FBI, Gabon, Sweden, Cambodia, and now MediaWorks

    • CCd

      the way you all speak about MEGA just gives the feeling that everyone will only use MEGA as a piracy website. It’s a cyberlocker with encryption now. Why mediafireDropBox is a cyberlocker and MEGA is a piracy site?
      He bought ad space for a cyberlocker service. I don’t understand why MediaWorks has a reason to pull the plug off.

      • Anyone

        because the MAFIAA threatened them

    • http://www.facebook.com/andrew.strautz Andrew Strautz

      While the argument is true, you can’t argue that its the best advertizing model he has rite now since every other option is being systematical blocked. While old model recording industry ads get pulled all the time you don’t hear anyone giving half a crap about them, meanwhile the free advertizement is actually getting him off the ground. He doesn’t even have to pay the news outlets to get a story put in or a full page ad he just has to complain that he is being wronged. For better or worse it is the case, self preservation, guilt by association or CYOA aside getting black balled was the best thing that could happen to Dot Com; lest the troubling legal problems domestically and abroad.

    • Justice

      Since you are working for the entertainment industry and since 80% of the entertainment industry employees are pederast there is 80% chance you are one. 100% of the entertainment industry executives and others major figures are pederasts too. So if we destroy all your headquarters we will get ride of 80% pederasts and 20% non-pederast but guilty of other things such as fraud assassination satanism and money laundering and human trafficking.

      Don’t you think this will be worth it?

      • KrakOrJak

        Jeez… “pederast”? I had to look that one up… LOL

    • SpunkingInTheFaceOfThe1%

      Here’s by dirty ringpiece. Tongue-grind the rim bitch.

  • manky goes to bollywood

    We must spread the word for Mega ourselves. Tell everyone you know, people power will eventually end the monopoly of the entertainment industry.

    • Caladol1

      the MAFIAA censorship are make MEGA necessary, publicity is good but there is a market need for this kind of service

    • Guest

      but who need this? really. filesharing sites is the dinosaurs of the internet and must die off to let bittorrent glory trough!

      hail TPB – king of the internet

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Ender-Wiggin/100000885624281 Ender Wiggin

        why do we need a framework of end to end, user friendly crypto? gosh, i can’t imagine any possible reason…../sarcmark,

        • Guest

          turn on encryption in your client, you sarcastic chump >_>

      • Guest321

        Because one solution does not work for everyone or for all purposes. Bittorrent has its inherent weaknesses and that’s why cyberlockers will always be in business.

        • http://www.facebook.com/people/Ender-Wiggin/100000885624281 Ender Wiggin

          the key part of my comment was “user friendly”. most interwebz users wouldn’t have the first idea how to protect their traffic, and it’s never been attempted a user friendly internet standard.
          Frankly if he pulls it off, it’ll change the world.

      • Whatever

        A reason would be that not everything is available on bittorrent. Even worse now that demonoid is offline. And even if some things were on bittorrent before it may not be anymore as torrents also die out.

        Another reason is not to have a single target of failure. If TPB is all that is left in the world it would be easy enough to get blocked worldwide. A proxy only works as long as there are still countries without the great firewall of USA.

    • xpmule

      no we should spread file sharing in all free forms and not supporting people who want nothing more than to make money off of scene releases distributed by groups.

      If your gonna support this guy you might as well offer the same support to guys that run sites like ReleaseLog ..so they can make money from what SHOULD be free !

  • robthom

    Why would he waste money on promotion?

    I couldn’t think of a better example of something that would spread at a grassroots level without it.

    • cgimusic

      Well he hasn’t actually wasted any now and thanks to the Streisand effect he may have just got some of the most valuable marketing ever completely free.

      • Just sayin

        Perhaps that was the point of the exercise…

        • HaHA

          I think he plays the system like a musical instrument.

        • xpmule

          ya he’s shrewd lol

  • cgimusic

    If you want a reason to support independent artists and stop feeding these corporate bullies then look no further than this.

    • Day365

      The other day a TV host, in my country, was talking about MegaBox,
      she said “the owner of MegaUpload did bad things in the past,
      now he’s trying to make the things in a right way”, haha,
      she obviously doesn’t know anything about MegaUpload’s case
      and thinks MegaBox will work side by side with RIAA.

  • http://twitter.com/CrAppl_dot_com St1ve Joebs

    Spread the word via email,twitter,FB and word of mouth, FUC* the MAFIAA.

    • xpmule

      spread what word ?
      that he ran a file locker service and got arrested because he was making a fortune ?
      he isn’t the only one that had a file locker service that has been shutdown.
      what about the other guys ? fuck them i guess eh ?

      He’s a hero ?
      How so ?

      I believe he was treated unfairly and i hope he wins his case but he was making money from so called piracy when most of us do it for free *as its suppose to be !

      how this makes him a martyr i have no idea..

      and his new business model has little to do with file sharing support.
      It has to do with saving his own ass and making more money ..period.

      • RisingPhoenix

        No, actually you’re wrong,

        If only you knew how much money was made on all the ads on filesharingsites. (Hell, I wish I knew, but I can’t imagine it being next to nothing)

        But that’s beside the point. The point is he was treated unfairly, as he was actually running a generic file locker service, and he is still being treated unfairly. He was just operating within the bounds of the law.

        When RIAA (or any other anti-piracy outfit) calls a certain website a piracy haven, even though it’s a legitimate business that gets abused by its users now and then, everyone believes it.

        The record industry has too much power nowadays, and even though I believe you’re right that Kim Dotcom wasn’t a saint either, I believe our interests (being breaking the influence and punishing those who abuse copyright sanctions for commercial interests) are aligned today.

        I still believe Megaupload was operating within bounds of the law, especially because they did filter content based on DCMA notices. Doing so should have protected them, just as it protects services like YouTube and Dropbox. The whole situation was just a display of the level of corruption of certain parts of the American Government.

        And if a business, which is operating within the boundaries of the law, isn’t protected by it, then who can call himself/herself truly safe? Who can call himself truly free?

        Land of the free? I don’t think so.

        • RisingPhoenix

          And about the other guys (I see I forgot to mention it): Yes, they are martyrs too, but Kim Dotcom is one of the only people in the list that chose to fight and has the enough money and opportunity to do so. It’s only natural that we focus our attention on him, as he’s our best shot.

          I’m absolutely curious about the endgame.

        • Whatever

          “certain parts”

          Are you sure that you shouldn’t leave that part out.

        • xpmule

          fair reply but how has what the man has said and done translated into the fact that he’s become a file sharing super hero and martyr ?
          I seen one guy in this story comments who said KDC will end the MAFIAA and a crap load of people clicked like.
          where is this missing link i do not see ?
          all i hear is how he’s trying to get people on board with what he is doing.
          I can’t remember hearing any comments how he’s gonna battle for our file sharing rights.. he is setting up a business and trying to make money and he letting people believe what ever they want to believe (what smart people do)

          He was treated unfairly and he better win his case !
          I wish him luck with his future business ideas, BUT
          lets be realistic here about his role as the leader & fighter for File Sharing supporters.

          If he wants to battle for file sharing rights great !
          But is this what is happening or has he positioned himself so that people will back up dump trucks of money on him because he was a victim with megaupload ?
          I seen comments on this page where people were saying that they are going to throw tons of cash at KDC’s new business to screw the MAFIAA !
          And then of course the huge pile of “likes”.
          i gotta shake my head..

          Have I or have I not painted a picture here ?
          With so MANY comments no one has any opinion on what i said ?
          Was i not explaining myself very well ?

          As usual i feel like i am the guy standing by himself watching people drink the purple Koolaid ..shaking my head in disappointment.

          by the way i DO like purple Koolaid too ..I’m drinking it right now lol

        • RisingPhoenix

          XPMule, thank you for the reply.

          As of the part of KDC being a hero. Well, you’re right, he’s not, but he is kind of a big (no pun intended) game for the next couple of years.

          The reason why people look up to him nowadays is that instead of giving up after all of this, he just decided to start anew and reinvent cyberlockers. Partly because of the money, but also just to be a pain in the ass for the ones who tried to take him down.

          The new MEGA will feature encryption on all files and only the account holder will be able to decrypt it (and people who get the key). This will give MEGA total deniability as they just can’t know what’s on their servers. The only thing they can see is encrypted files.

          They also will be working with multiple hosting providers: any hosting provider can just “connect” and offer storage (and they too won’t be able to know what’s on their servers).

          And although MEGA probably will be taking down links in order to comply with DCMA, this kind of is a big deal. Even if authorities want to get all files associated with an account, they won’t be able to decrypt them (as not even MEGA is able to do so, only the user himself). Again total deniability and total privacy for your files.

          By doing this they ensure there is no possible way for them to be considered anything other than a legal company. And this will become a real thorn in the eye of the MPAA and the other outfits.

          If the entertainment industries try to take them down, (which will be near to impossible because of the chaotic hosting provider design), they will only make their illegal corrupt actions even more high profile. KDC is actually challenging them. And the more mistakes these outfits make, the better, right? Especially if they have no effect whatsoever.

          Now, I know you’re upset that this is just a company out to make money for filesharing, but in a way by starting this KDC leads us to the next big thing that can reside on the same level as Bittorrent: very difficult to takedown, encrypted traffic, but fully legal (as being a generic cyberlocker). Plus, you can be certain that KDC will be investing a part of the money to protect this business. So he will be fighting, if not just for self-interest. And because he will be making a lot of money, unlike some of the bittorrent indexing sites, he will be able to afford a grand army of lawyers.

          It’s great to just have options. I’m sure Mega will also take a little bit of the heat of the piratebay and other torrent indexing site as well. And maybe by launching this cyberlocker there will come a day when our opponents may finally come to the conclusion that resistance is futile. (which is also good for us)

          So no, KDC is not a hero, but our interests are aligned.

        • xpmule

          RisingPhoenix
          i read your last reply and i hear what your saying but have one thought..
          there is still no way around the fact that files are going to have a file name as they always have so…
          really what difference is encryption gonna make ?
          let me put it this way.. most file locker downloads i grab are password protected so.. ?
          see where i’m goin with this ?

          also unless KDC publicly says his long term plan publicly and we assume he’s telling the truth then all we can do is speculate.. and that is enough for many to consider him a martyr/hero and shower the man with cash..
          and lets face it there are better plays to dump your money if people so intent on giving it away.. try supporting people that can NOT afford to defend themselves rather than the guy with the mansion and fleet of sports cars etc. lol

  • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/RKKPBJMHI22ZE7BO2BHOFA3TMM Volker

    Record Labels simply “Blackmailed” the Radio station to pull the plug,
    thats another proof that the MAFIAA is simply an globally operating
    crime syndicate, nothing more and nothing less.

    • Test

      Think that should read

      “… globally operating, government backed crime syndicate,”

      • Anal Seepage

        wheres the “sad but true” button?

  • Liam Jh

    This is not news – its an opinion piece, and a bit of promotion for KDC.

    • Scary_Devil_Monastery

      Well, it is news as far as it illustrates the “chilling effect”. MediaWorks is backing out of an already agreed-on advertising deal.

      Now, if a providers backs out of a deal for ethical reasons they are usually very quick to say so. Apparently that is not the case.

      So what “commercial reason” can cause a radio station to drop a source of revenue?

      • Liam Jh

        Until there is a statement from MediaWorks explaining the ‘commercial reason’ it’s still just opinion and assumption.

        I believe MediaWorks are cowardly not saying – “If we air your adds we will be fucked over big time by the MPAA/RIAA supporting labels/advertisers”.

        Just must be a slow ‘news’ day – its not like KDC needs more attention :)

        • Anyone

          if turning down 500 ads for “commercial reasons” it only means someone else paid more than those 500 ads

        • Day365

          Yes, MediaWorks probably doesn’t want to say:
          “They paid more than Kim”, that could be the ‘commercial reason’.

        • Scary_Devil_Monastery

          “I believe MediaWorks are cowardly not saying – “If we air your adds we will be fucked over big time by the MPAA/RIAA supporting labels/advertisers”.”

          I’m not betting against those odds.

          There are many reasons it’s not good to be a radio station with a public performance license, one of which is that someone else holds your short and curlies in a vice-like grip.

      • Guest

        Most commercial stations need a licence deal with the music labels concerned.
        It’s usually a broad licence which includes all the labels. Each time a track is played it costs so many peanuts and it’s logged and totted up on the computer. Payments are distributed at regular intervals. It only takes a threat to withdraw a licence or treble the price of a licence and a music station has nothing to play or can’t afford.

        No music= no custom= no ad revenue. Simple enough to figure.

        • Anyone

          it seems in this case the music and movie industry threatened to pull their ads
          not the music directly, I think they are in long term deals with those, so they can’t efficiently threaten with those

    • Guest

      Yeah, it’s only like enigmax’s opinion that MediaWorks turned down Mega’s ad campaign, man.

      Just how stupid are you, Liam?

      • Liam Jh

        Yeah, it’s only like enigmax’s opinion that MediaWorks turned down Mega’s ad campaign, man. – no that’s news – that is a fact.
        What I commented on as being opinion, was the reasoning for pulling the ad’s, as it is only KDC’s opinion why they where pulled.
        I know how stupid I am, do you – follow the thread.

        • Anyone

          no, there is an insider source on mediaworks that said that, it’s not just speculation

        • Liam Jh

          It don’t say that in the ‘Story’ which is what I am commenting on, not some insider source that you have not named.

        • Anyone

          I got that from this site: http://www.nbr.co.nz/opinion/mediaworks-pulls-kim-dotcom-radio-ads

          (funnily enough sorted under “opinion” ;))

    • xpmule

      “This is not news – its an opinion piece, and a bit of promotion for KDC.”

      I agree with that but its still an interesting story to share and i probably would have not heard about this info otherwise.

  • MAFIAA’s Nightmare come true

    I had to think about your comment, 19. Yes, Mega opens its doors on the 19th. 3 days of nail biting anticipation.

    Hold steady with Metallica’s entire back catalogue in glorious FLAC shipmates ;)

    • Day365

      Don’t forget about their heart, which is the WAV.

  • Gmail

    Has enough money to pay for advertising of a website that will be shut down, however does not have enough money to pay his lawyers… What is that I smell?

    You will soon find out…

    • Guest

      The scent of your own bullshit.

      Spending money on Mega is wiser than spending it on court costs, because Mega will generate all the revenue Dotcom needs to pay for his lawyers.

      Also, let’s see them try to shut down Mega. That’d be fucking epic on the heels of the illegal shutdown of Megaupload and ensuing clusterfuck for the DoJ and NZ authorities. Go ahead, assholes, raid Dotcom’s legal company again. It’s working out so well for you from the last time you did that.

      • Gmail

        You found out too soon…

    • Anon

      new business = revenue = $, duh

    • Anyone

      there are other investors besides dotcom
      his fortune is still being held ransom, but other people have money, too

      • Gmail

        Investing in a company run by a known and admitted “hacker”… I’m sure lots of people are clamoring to give him money…

        • Anyone

          it seems enough people have done that, that’s why Mega can launch

        • FeMail

          Not much different to the FBI/CIA/NSA employing known and admitted “hackers” then is it? Except that he’s now trying to make money from a legitimate business, not from using his “hacking skillz” for the benefit of a US government agency.

        • Scary_Devil_Monastery

          Actually yes. Dotcom can run successful businesses. Capital investors value such quality in a man and frankly do not give a damn about what that man did ten years ago.

          And if I were speculating about investing in an online digital venture, “hacker” is a pretty good addition to the CV. It means he knows security, to begin with.

    • Scary_Devil_Monastery

      “Has enough money to pay for advertising of a website that will be shut down, however does not have enough money to pay his lawyers… What is that I smell?”

      Because having your funds unfrozen to pay for legal fees for Megaupload is another kettle of fish than embezzling money from Megaupload in order to set up another company?

      What smells appears to be that dead horse you’re trying to ride.

  • Ray186

    You know what I smell? The US government being ordered to pay this man an obscene amount of money.

    • UraPhake

      I liked this ad from KDC himself:

      “This Sunday, the Prime Minister will get an angry call from the White House – Mega.co.nz.”

      Probably from two other limp-dicks as well: Biden and Dodd.

  • Facefuck

    Motherfuckers can’t play by their own rules… so they just quit like the little ragefags they are and always will be and go cry to the DoJ, the White House’s appendix (aka Joe Biden) and all the networks and stations around the world how unjust this new distribution model is and that it threatens MILLIONS of imaginary work places all around the world blah blah blub.
    Then they strongarm some smaller networks into submission and force a boycott of anything they deem uncooperative to eliminate competition.
    Damn I have the sudden urge to punch a big media company CEO in the fucking guts. And strangle some talentless mainstream artist with their own mike :D right on stage. Then procede to crucify every single person involved in the unlawful takedown of Megaupload. Crooks be crooks till the end of existence.
    And don’t play that bullshit card about them trying to protect their business model… haha. Yeah right. It’s all about their companies well being, the creation and preservation of culture (lol) and keeping the economy strong… by avoiding taxes and bribing other crooks to do the dirty work for them while keeping anybody at bay with their private contractor armies of lawyers xDDD

    • 44

      Amen, kill all them rotten scumbags! Starting with chris dodd.

  • Rxster

    Thank you torrentfreak for your excellent coverage of this story.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_4CUFGPXYI63VY7JGZWHBB2NI4Q albie

    The lawyers are ready,if it launches they’ll have it shut down immediately,spoke to our NZ office last week they tell me that the government there is trying to find a save face way of deporting him back to Germany.,

    • Questiontime

      ‘The lawyers are ready,if it launches they’ll have it shut down immediately’

      On what grounds?

      How will they shut it down? You think KDC has this running on a couple of servers in his house that you can just go unplug?

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_4CUFGPXYI63VY7JGZWHBB2NI4Q albie

        It’s all out war,all the lawyers will need is just 1 download of a copyrighted product from his to shut it down again,let’s speak again in a weeks time.

        • Anyone

          since everything on the server is encrypted Mega has no idea what is stored on their servers
          so how should they prevent the storage of copyrighted material?

          this is genius, perfect plausible deniability
          I mean even against MegaUpload they couldn’t do anything within the law, it only got shut down with many many breeches of law by the prosecution both in NZ and US

        • 1hhh1

          I attended a family day at the Sorbonne here in Paris where my daughter studied International law,all the Professors were onstage,answer questions,and believe me these are very well respected people,they have no axe to grind with anyone.A first year student brought up the subject of illegal downloading of copyrighted material and their unanimous verdict was that if the powers to be really wanted to shut all the sites down is just to simply add it to the common purpose/association laws,ie it simply means that it becomes illegal for any site to give you directions to download a movie,music whatever.So the sites will then ALL be illegal and liable for all damages ect.These laws already apply in most countries.These are not my thoughts but I must admit I was impressed by the Professors arguments.

        • Liam Jh

          Do you understand how Mega works?
          For the lawyers to find ‘copyrighted’ work, they will either have to put it there themselves or get the encryption key from the person who did. Either way – Mega are not responsible for the material being stored.

        • Dont believe you hear

          ‘It’s all out war’

          Yes it is, but your side is not winning the hearts and minds of the people :)

          ‘all the lawyers will need is just 1 download of a copyrighted product from his to shut it down again’

          orly!!! You should keep away from lawyers that will tell you anything just to keep taking money from you. Don’t forget it’s the lawyers that are profiting the most from this ‘war’. They’re fleecing the movie and record businesses for all they got. Just how much money has been spent on legal fees in this ‘war’ so far?

          ‘let’s speak again in a weeks time’

          I’m sure you’ll be back before then…

        • Day365

          If they want to prove there is copyrighted material,
          they will need to get, what they call in USA,
          ‘illegal files’ and commit the ‘crime of DOWNLOADING those files’,
          I wonder, how innocent will they be in the eyes of the US law, if they do that?

          If they want to shutdown Mega, their unique alternative is:
          acting above the law… Again!

        • Scary_Devil_Monastery

          @1hhh1

          “…is just to simply add it to the common purpose/association laws,ie it simply means that it becomes illegal for any site to give you directions to download a movie,music whatever…”

          Unfortunately in order to perform that operation, in the end what you need is to make math and computer language illegal.

          And this is why the law on common purpose and association from France is radically different when applied to physical behavior, and mere information.

          I almost hope france does another HADOPI and tries. It’ll be amusing when they find out that no one can legally run a french website any longer under the law of the land.

    • Anon

      he is supposed to have it decentralized so how to shut that part down once it is released into wild?

  • radioactive

    The entertainment industry wants to prevent the airing of Mega Ads? Now he’s in the news!

  • Guest

    After hearing that advert, it sounds like they did him a favor.

    • Scary_Devil_Monastery

      They did.

      It’s a mark of the “Entertainment Industry” that they do not understand media.

      If they did they would have learned about the “Streisand Effect”.

  • iMeZiV0x

    The MAFIAA just kinda facepalmed there. Good job for promoting MEGA for free.

  • Anonymous

    if anything like this had been done AGAINST the record labels etc, they would have gone absolutely fucking ape shit!! i am wondering now as well, why there has been no follow up to what has happened, given how deep is the pile of shit that the NZ government etc are in over the whole Mega case? i guess they are afraid to be seen to be doing the ‘right thing’ and actually standing against the US before another load hits fan!!

  • Guest

    Mega will end the MAFIAA

    • xpmule

      and then your alarm clock when off lol

      • http://twitter.com/videocrafter Z

        when off? I suppose we’ll see a proper reply from you went you grow up.

  • Nospam

    I would gladly go to mega even if it sucked just to fuck the record industry and the mafiaa over and im sure there are others that think like me

    • Anal Seepage

      yup, more than you think

    • 44

      Exactly what I’m doing the second MEGA comes online.

    • xpmule

      wow

      this is gonna be a train wreck !

      why are you making him a file sharing martyr ?

      and why are you and others going to pay him a fortune when competing services do it for free ?

      You think he really cares about file sharing ?
      he cares about 1 thing and guess what that is ;)

      • Scary_Devil_Monastery

        Why?

        1) He isn’t threatening to go after our civil rights and freedoms over an outdated information-control system called “Copyright”.

        2) He’s put his finger in the MPAA/RIAA’s eye up to the second knuckle.

        I’m thinking of sending him a 100$ bill “For fucking it up for people I don’t like”.

        • xpmule

          that makes no sense.
          you guys are going to make him RICH $$$$
          why ?

          because she stood up to the US govt ?
          really ?

          well fuck me lol
          Hell i’ll stand up to the US govt..
          i want a fleet of dump trucks to back up cash to my feet !

          Go ahead guys but i would consider putting your money in a more appropriate place such as the many people and organizations that REALLY DO NEED YOUR MONEY
          and
          Who are actually CONFIRMED fighting for file sharing rights !
          You guys could be helping the people that NEED help defending themselves.. such as ALL the other file hosters who got shut down but weren’t rich like KDC so had no choice but to bend of backwards and taker it in the ass from the DOJ etc

          But hey its not my decision where you guys wanna spend your money..
          go ahead and make the rich even richer while other file sharing victims are taken down because they can’t afford to defend themselves financially.

        • Scary_Devil_Monastery

          @Comingupforblair

          “You really are a prick. You have probably been told that your whole life, but I figured just one more time would not hurt.
          Ok lets make it two….YOU ARE A PRICK”

          Actually…in real life no one has ever told me that. And on boards such as these I only ever hear it from copyright maximalist cunts who are pissed because I refuse to let them screw me over.

          So, with all respect due, when affirmed little stains of asswipe such as you throw me bad names It only gives me that warm fuzzy feeling of knowing I’m doing the right thing.

  • Anon

    Remember the very early days right after Napster? No lawyers to end users, no threats, no judiciary, just literally 10′s of millions of dollars in copyright education NOT funded by taxpayers but instead by the very industries being ransacked. A respectful white glove approach to education. In those days digital industries of all kinds (not just music) believed that clarification was all that was needed and a light, educational touch was the respectful way to do it.

    No more. lol Look at digital industry now!

    Now every digital industry in the world– dwarfing the tiny American entertainment companies– are ALL gearing up with alliances with their governments and judiciaries and are launching punitive campaigns that begin with aggressive surveillance techniques and demonstrably end with nasty court cases and jail terms. And the indictments get more brutal and the jail terms get noticeably longer every month. And you still keep this shit up. lol really, this is just stupid/funny now.

    Is there a pirate here that honestly believes that this mess is not a response, rather than an unprovoked initiative? Is anyone here old enough to remember the network circa 1992,3,4 when bandwidth was on a 14.4 dial up, piracy wasn’t even practical at those speeds and NOBODY…..NO…..BODY…..was even thinking a small disfigured-thinking group of scofflaw pirates would drive the scene to where we are today.

    Now even the labels are joining you on the “I don’t give a shit about your rights” playing field that you, yourselves created and still high-five each other about.

    Now that’s entertainment!

    • Guest321

      You can’t stop human nature. Sharing is in all our blood except those who are anti-social. Even back in the 14.4kbps days people used to share media one way or the other.

    • Liam Jh

      In 1992, 93, 94 – Educational establishments where the place to be for piracy. I learned everything about digital distribution through school, sharing copys of the latest Fairlight crack across the network. Piracy was practical then just as it is now.

      • Andrew me

        I remember in the days when Bush was in power and Bill gates went to one of the third world countries, and the president/prime minister/crazy leader thanked him and the fact that people could download windows free for the amazing growth in the countries wealth of education in the computer field, he stated very clearly that if it had not been for the availability of pirated copies of windows his country would never have even been a small part of the global computer revolution. Yes Gates was embarrassed and moved quickly onto another subject but this proved beyond doubt that sharing is good for the world not just for the lone pirate sitting in his basement learning how to use photoshop so he can get a job and start contributing to society.

    • Guest

      Rights? In the ‘old days’ the media corps had no rights, that’s why piracy was rampant. Nobody then was breaking the law. Even with all these years of bending politicians ears, the media corps still can’t (and never will) stop people copying things.

      To be frank, all you have left is a damage limitation option.
      Plug the internet ‘black hole’ and ya’ll think the problem goes away.
      Well, it wont. It is already too large a phenomenon.
      Like drugs, the only hope you got is to spend years driving it from public view, but in the end you will only end up with more users, and law officials slapping each other on the back for capturing ever greater hauls. The more you make it illicit, the more people will want it. That, my dear troll, is called ‘human nature’.

      • xpmule

        out of sight out of mind..

        i’m old enough that i used to copy tapes in a double cassette deck or record off the radio etc and all the so called piracy back then is probably over all the same amount now as then. amount of people doing it i mean.
        but they can SEE it nowadays there for they all of a sudden have some big problem with it..

    • Anal Seepage

      Anon’s rambling

      Now that’s entertainment!

      • xpmule

        the guy has a vile and offensive snotty insulting attitude also.
        he can’t just make his opinion heard he has to slip in some form of attack or insult with it almost always..

    • I Didn’t Do It

      The pirate’s actions were a response to major labels and movie studios screwing up their customers and their artists. It was THEM who started not giving a rat’s ass about everyone else’s rights!

      • KuntAndTheGang

        Damn right. They shut down Napster and then sat there NOT PROVIDING THE LEGIT MP3 DOWNLOAD SERVICE THE PEOPLE WERE CRYING OUT AT THE TOP OF THEIR VOICES FOR. Then after 2 years had passed with the record labels doing fuck all except trying to convince people that they didn’t want mp3s, but still wanted CDs, Apple did their pissing job for them and launched the iTunes Music Store and made a shit load of money in the process from selling the things that people wanted to those people in a way they’d asked for (albeit with much fighting against the record labels to get rid of the early DRM and the stupid geographical limitations on the store and some of the music available in each region).

        And then the MAFIAA shills have the gall to come on here and try to revise history to suggest WE are to blame for the shitty situation they’ve found themselves in through their own stupid business decisions.

        • 2013sUxAlready

          and the shitty Itunes port on non-apple hardware xD never forget what an epic fail that bitch was. Lose all your music? Pay us to download it again! U mad bro?

      • Pelham123

        Major labels and movie studios started trying 15 years ago to use digital bootlegging as an excuse to claim/lie that copying was piracy. It didn’t stick, legally or with the public.

        Digital bootlegging is still somewhat as unauthorized as selling bootlegs always was.

        And Anon continues to claim that it means something to state that efforts to manipulate are bought on by the existence of the manipulated. As always, his Stockholm Syndrome says more about him than it does about anything else.

        • Scary_Devil_Monastery

          It’s not even a Stockholm’s syndrome anymore. This time he actually rewrote history, claiming that the internet conjured hordes of “pirates”.

          As if we hadn’t heard the same tune from the media industry for well over a century. Starting with the self-playing piano and moving on through the cassette tape and VCR to the current day.

    • ThumbsUpThumbsDown

      You really love this shit:

      “OH! My Father! Who are in Corporate Heaven!! Hollowed be thy Corporate Name!! Thy kingdom come! Thy Corporate will be done!! On earth, as it is in Heaven!! Give us this day our daily bread; and, forgive us our tresspasses; as we abuse those who tresspass our Interests!! And, lead us not into redemption, but deliver us from Democratic Good! For Thine is the Corporate Kingdom …….. The CORPORATE POWER and THE CORPORATE GLORY!! Forever and Forever. Amen!!”

      I agree with you…..

      Way too many of these people are too lazy, too stupid, and too uninterested.

      If they don’t wake up, they’d better learn your prayer.

      • Anon

        You’re an idiot. This never had anything to do with “corporate” per se. This has always been about taking whatever is for free but paying or doing without if the rightsholder intends it for sale. That goes for digital merchandise created and for sale by indies, too, you clown.

        • Guest

          Anything that is produced can be copied so if you don’t want your shit to be copied then don’t produce it.

        • Anyone

          anything that can be copied at no cost IS free
          there is no way around that fact

        • KuntAndTheGang

          You fucking idiot. Go eat your own shit sauteed in a jus of badger semen.

          This has never been about stopping ‘taking for free’, this has always been about trying to stop the march of technological progress and forcing people to support a market that just doesn’t exist in the way the MAFIAA want it to anymore.

          They never supplied what the people wanted to pay for. A fucking computer company had to do it for them. Ridiculous. These corporates are so bad at business, even when their customers are telling them exactly what services they want to pay for, that they don’t deserve to survive.

        • Wallace

          If something is offered for free, then it is free regardless of the rightsholder’s intent. For example: supermarket samples, birthday presents, your odd use of the words “idiot” and “clown.”

        • Guest

          Copies created with the owner’s consent are not taken. But I guess you could say they’re free, in the same way that if I show you a picture in my wallet, you viewed it for free. Interesting debate.

        • Guest321

          When 3D printers become mainstream, can you stop me from copying physical products? I am sure the 3D design files of various products will be floating all over TPB like PC game cracks by then.

          If I have the ability to copy something for free at my home, then I have every right to do it. I am not reselling the copies I made for profit, so all those patent laws and copyright laws simply don’t come into the equation here.

    • markh

      Just remember the boomerang effect, What goes will come back also, first the vcr then cd player then the dvd now the internet. torrents will be something in the past in the future, because something new will come. My opinion is the more they push the less people will buy. I find it really funny how the Western World is blaming countries like Iran North Korea of Cambodja they they mistreat their own citizens, but United States Government is as worse as them. There is no real democracy in the United States.

    • Anon

      I apologize about the length of my thread, so let me sum up:

      I imagine ever-increasing punishments.

      Let me also clarify that in the days before Napster there were no punishments or responses of any kind. So they are definitely increasing.

      And it’s your fault, because any and all punishments are by definition the fault of the punished. If the punishments were not your fault, the punishments wer not exist.

      Also, I am about to slap you, which you deserve, because if you did not deserve it, I would not be doing it. Keep high-fiving each other about doing the mysterious things that caused me to slap you.

      Nobody anticipated that all the things you were doing would cause me to slap you, and yet there you are, slapped.

      Some would say I just slapped you without cause, but that is crazy talk. Only a fool would think slaps occur without cause.

      The noose is tightening.

      • Anon

        And the slaps get more brutal and the spankings get noticeably longer every month. And you still keep this shit up, i.e. exist. lol really, this is just stupid/funny now.

        Boy, looking back, that last sentence is the truest I’ve ever written. Stupid/funny describes this whole thing.

        • xpmule

          and yet i’m STILL sitting here laughing at you Anon lol

          whats funny is the delusional rantings from a copyright troll supporter.

          i will be around IN YOUR FACE for a long LONG time to come kid

          and I’ll be the one laughing the whole times sweety lol

      • Scary_Devil_Monastery

        Didn’t you post this once?

        Oh, sorry, that was the other “Anon”. Good thing you say the same thing in different ways at least.

    • Scary_Devil_Monastery

      Do you rewrite the history books in your spare time as a form of kinky hobby, Baghdad bob?

      Because from what I remember the industry has been crying to mommy government for over a century in the exact same tune.

      So if you want to actually make a point that we “pirates” are to blame then we need to go back all the way to 1906 when the musicians cried the self-playing piano would put them out of business…

      And then go on through Radio, Vinyl, The Tape Cassette, The Video Cassette Recorder, floppy disc, the MP3-player, the CD-rom, the DVD….

      But it’s a nice little story you are spinning there. In what alternative reality did that happen? Ah. Only inside your own head?

      The industry has been lobbying their asses off to get EVERY storage or transmission invention ever invented banned or restricted since early last century. And they have always, invariably failed.

      And they will repeat that performance, I have no doubt. Going for an Einstein definition of insanity one more time for good measure.

      Well done, Baghdad Bob. This time an almost lyrical prose wrapped around a revision of history completely void of fact and reason.

      • http://gene-poole.tumblr.com Gene Poole

        They haven’t always failed. I think they’re solely responsible for the death of the DAT tapes. Pretty minor victory though.

    • Anon is a cunt, also its wrong

      in 92,3,4 for many the only place to get software was with pirates. They had a far better, faster and more widespread distribution network than even the largest distributors at the time. We had hours drive to the nearest software store, so the way people got software was through the scene and by swapping disks.

  • http://gene-poole.tumblr.com Gene Poole

    Megaconz. That’s awesome.

  • Gb

    Hello, this, IS, their advertisement

    Let it be known spread it high and wide, for the good of mankind : D

    Kinda kidding

    Honestly
    All i can think is “and so it begins”

  • Bleah

    19 , 20 ,21….

    I will tell you something .. nobody will use the ..NEW.. mega…why?
    Because nobody uses bayfiles… why?

    BECAUSE ALL THE UPLOADERS UPLOAD ON PAY PER SALE OR PER DOWNLOAD WEBSITES.

    • Guest

      Guess you just don’t know where to find your files.

  • Guest

    Clearly Kim understands the Streisand effect. Nicely played Xanatos gambit.

    • Scary_Devil_Monastery

      What boggles me is the MPAA/RIAA still don’t.

      This way in addition to getting the desired advertising for FREE, Kim gets to be the underdog unfairly put upon, while MediaWorks get to be the poor schmucks just trying to stay alive.

  • ThumbsUpThumbsDown

    What a Nightmare!

    Kim DotCom Free……. The New Mega Kicking ASS!!

    Mothers everywhere asking, “Where do I Download p2p for Geniuses?”

  • Guest

    NEWS JUST IN

    Canadian Court Rejects U.S. Government Demand for Full Access to Megaupload Servers Seized in Canada: http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/6755/125/

    • Anon

      That’s a false headline, gets your facts straight. The Canadian Court asked for a more refined request for access to the data on the servers. They didn’t “reject” anything.

      Geist is the real reject.

      • Guest

        They Canadian Court REJECTED the US demand for FULL access request but then the Canadian Court asked for a more refined request. So the Canadian Court DID REJECT the US government demand for full access as per stated in the headline. It is you that should get your facts right Anon!

      • SpunkingInTheFaceOfThe1%

        Just fuck off, nobody likes you. You can’t even like yourself, otherwise you wouldn’t be trolling here so regularly.

      • markh

        Anon it is clear that you are stupid, read the following lines

        The application for a sending order is adjourned without a fixed return date, returnable on 7 days’ notice. If counsel are unable to agree as to how the scope of relevant material is to be defined then the matter may be brought back before a judge of this court for determination of that issue.

        or better yet go to the website of the Superior Court of Justice of Ontario

        http://canlii.ca/en/on/onsc/doc/2013/2013onsc193/2013onsc193.html

      • Anon

        That’s a false headline, gets your facts straight. The Canadian Court asked for a more refined request for access to the data on the servers. They didn’t “reject” anything. I mean, they rejected the submitted request, but that’s not a rejection, that’s just a rejection.

        Geist is the real reject.

        Punishments will increase.

        • Scary_Devil_Monastery

          You don’t have to repeat yourself, we read it clearly the first time.

      • Scary_Devil_Monastery

        “Geist is the real reject.”

        Let’s see, professor, named as one of Canada’s top 40 under 40, active on roughly a dozen government-associated boards…

        I think we’ll’ have to accept Geist’s word over the word of someone who thought the inception of the internet was the first time filesharers and the media industry clashed for real.

        Or who believes “law” means putting suspects of filesharing into small prison cells with roommates named “Tiny”.

        But hey, don’t let mere fact stop you from blithering on. Entertainment for the masses your new shtick, Baghdad Bob?

    • Anon

      That’s a false headline, gets your facts straight. The Canadian Court asked for a more refined request for access to the data on the servers. They didn’t “reject” anything. I mean, they rejected the submitted request, but that’s not a rejection, that’s just a rejection.

      Geist is the real reject.

      Punishments will increase.

  • G00ber

    Tell me this.

    If, as pirates say about fledgling musicians, giving your stuff away for free is the best way to advertize then why does Kim Dotcom (an already well established global brand) need to spend a fortune on advertising?

    Surely if there is any merit in the giving stuff away for free theory being the ultimate marketing strategy then Mr Dotcom ought to be to the fore in proving this theory and not lining the pockets of commercial radio stations by participating in advertising payola.

    Why are the rules different for him?

    • Anon

      Because piracy only offers exposure to rank beginners and even then for only a short time. Once you reach a point in a music career where you need to begin to sell music, piracy is no longer helpful and offers no economic platform on which to tour to the next level. In fact, consider that in 12 years since Napster, the number of musicians who have made it big, label-style big, can be counted on one hand. Now compare that ti the roster from the 1960′s, 70′s, 80′s and 1990′s. It’s a fact. Piracy undercuts a music career far more than it ever supported it.

      So the rules are “different” for him largely because ‘the rules” as pirates would like to believe them have been falsehoods all along. And let’s face facts.

      DotCom is in this for the money. For him. And only for him. And don’t forget it.

      • PhuckTrolls

        Thank you for the humor.
        Actually made me smile.
        This is one of those did-you-actually-keep-a-straight-face-when-you-said-it posts.

        I hope Kim makes LOTS of money.
        Then Mega will be spending lots on advertising educating the masses about encryption, and about how to keep their data, and their privacy, safe.

        I hope it help provide Kim the money to mount a vigorous defense,
        and helps him continue to expose the corruption and abuses of power.

        Comparing the “rules” today to the “rules” 20-40 years ago is ridiculous.
        And it underscores AGAIN how completely living-in-the-past clueless you are.

        _____

        When Mega launches everyone should send an email, or a tweet, or a text to five or more of their friends.

      • Guest

        “DotCom is in this for the money. For him. And only for him. And don’t forget it.”

        And the majority of people who are in business are only in it for themselves and no one else. And don’t you forget it!

      • Guest

        Let’s look at the sum total amount that people are willing to spend on music as a pie.

        Things that have also happened in the 12 years since Napster:

        1) Alternative platforms such as Youtube and others have allowed more independent artists to gain more exposure, thereby creating a situation where more artists are able to receive some of the pie. In the old days, artist exposure was determined primarily by the whims of the legacy media industries, who controlled the only effective channels for widespread promotion. Therefore, the entire pie was split between only the very few that the media industry allowed at the table. Now the pie is split among exponentially more artists.

        2) Alternative entertainment options such as video games have become far more mainstream, and crowd-sourced funding has become a reality. So some of the money that might have gone to buy music albums in the 70s or 80s now might be spent to buy a video game or to fund a neat idea on Kickstarter. And these are just two examples of alternative spending areas that have either appeared or become significantly more mainstream since Napster.

        3) The worst economic collapse since the 1920s has plagued the globe for the last four years. So now, between items (2) and (3), the amount of pie on the table to start with is vastly reduced from what it was in the 70s or 80s.

        4) The digital marketplace has allowed people to buy songs a la carte, so there is no longer any need to purchase an entire album at full price when someone only wants a song or two from the album.

        Your script isn’t the whole picture, Anon. But you and your masters know that.

        • Anon

          My only masters are the people I imagine spanking me – oops I mean spanking you/pirates/dot coms.

          Saying I have a corporate master is the first time in my life anyone has told me that somebody powerful wants me around and cares about what I think.

        • ReyTFox

          To add to that, the record industry took a hit in the early 80′s when kids spent their money on arcade games. Also, we can’t forget the CD price fixing collusion of the record companies during the 90′s and early 00′s that resulted in a class action settlement: http://urbanlegends.about.com/library/bl-cd-settlement.htm

      • markh

        because the oldies is good music, now they just make trash

      • Scary_Devil_Monastery

        “Once you reach a point in a music career where you need to begin to sell music, piracy is no longer helpful…”

        You mean Trent Reznor didn’t find piracy helpful?

        More history revisionism. Once you run out of history books to rewrite you may want to try your hand as a fiction writer.

        “So the rules are “different” for him largely because ‘the rules” as pirates would like to believe them have been falsehoods all along. And let’s face facts.”

        Yes, let’s face facts.

        Dotcom offers a free service. So the rules aren’t different at all. Why don’t we start there.

        Dotcom didn’t spend money on 500 ads. He offered to buy ads, was refused, and got his publicity anyway. For free. All thanks to Mediaworks caving under pressure.

        Honestly, Baghdad bob, how do you manage to shoot yourself in the foot so often using nothing more than a keyboard?

    • Anyone

      there is nothing wrong with getting more advertisement
      word of mouth is effective and cheap, but regular ads are still relevant

    • Anon

      Because piracy only offers exposure to rank beginners and even then for only a short time, because only newcomers have their music pirated. Once you reach a point in a music career where you need to begin to sell music, i.e. never or right away or something, piracy is no longer helpful and offers no economic platform on which to tour to the next level. In fact, consider that in 12 years since Napster, the number of musicians who have made it big, label-style big, can be counted on one hand. Now, I have no idea what “label-style big” means, I just invented it out of my ass. Does it refer to income? Fame? No idea. And since it’s not supported by any numbers, facts, examples, standards or any knowledge of popular music in any way, I can say it means that piracy undercuts a music career far more than it ever supported it. What else would it mean?

      Oh wait, your post is about dot coms? Yeah, they have contributed to piracy. Does anybody really think that punishments are not a response to dot coms? This is funny/stupid.

      • saba cat

        You keep yapping about Napster and holding it up like some golden victory… but even Lars Ulrich has expressed regret over jumping into that so fast without taking the time to find out what it was really about. …and now, he’s getting all kissy with Sean Parker at Spotify. Awww… how sweet! gag. I hope Sean is laughing his ass off!

      • Scary_Devil_Monastery

        You already posted exactly the same above. Saying the same in different words won’t help.

    • Scary_Devil_Monastery

      “…then why does Kim Dotcom (an already well established global brand) need to spend a fortune on advertising?”

      He didn’t. He simply offered to pay for 500 ads on radio and before you knew it he was big news for free.

      That said your statement requires amending:

      “Surely if there is any merit in the giving stuff away for free theory being the ultimate marketing strategy…”

      Giving stuff away is certainly a successful marketing strategy. Ask any marketer about promotions or take a look at the ballpoint pen or USB stick with a company logo on it you got handed by a friendly salesman.

      Where music is concerned, the case is different. The product you want to earn money on is ALSO the advertising for said product. The trick is to get as many to hear it as possible to ensure that you get those fans needed to carry you as a fan base. Pull a Trent Reznor-trick and you’re set for life and can sell them signed collector’s copies of the free music at 300$ a box.

      Dotcom, however, is trying to offer a service. That service, as you put it, is for free – which is where you are wrong about different rules. They’re not.

      However, in order for Doctom to get people to actually use the service, people have to know it exists. He can’t offer people a copy of a service on TPB, nor can he demonstrate it for free on youtube. His service doesn’t share music and video’s advantages there.

      And so he has to do what any purveyor of a physical service must do – advertise. The same way you can not – as of yet – download a car, Dotcom can not fully use the marketing potential of the internet for his service.

  • PhuckTrolls

    Google of “MediaWorks Mega radio ads”
    About 708,000 results (0.30 seconds)
    LOL
    In about 24 hours.

    FOAD G00ber-troll

    • G00ber

      @ Phuckface.

      So you can’t answer the question. Thanks.

      • PhuckTrolls

        The “question” is too stupid to waste time on an “answer.”
        The premise is ridiculous and the logic flawed.
        As always . . . Never argue with an idiot.
        And it is much more fun to mock a troll.

        Been reading some of the comments on those THOUSANDS of pages about this.
        Lots of Kim support in the comments on the NZ websites.
        Based of the public sentiment and the political situation there I would be really surprised if he is ever extradited.
        They are actually following the law.
        How quaint.

      • SpunkingInTheFaceOfThe1%

        Yes, the question is easy to answer. You just don’t deserve an answer. Now fuck off and go join your cracker friends Anon, bobmail, Nejtilpirater and RaisinedMind at the MAFIAA sex party. I hear the MPAA and the RIAA are anxious to spit roast you.

      • Scary_Devil_Monastery

        It’s hard to answer a question when the question contains false premises.

        “If, as pirates say about fledgling musicians, giving your stuff away for free is the best way to advertize then why does Kim Dotcom (an already well established global brand) need to spend a fortune on advertising?”

        Because it simply isn’t possible for Dotcom to put his service on TPB where there are hundreds of millions of users to see it?

        “Why are the rules different for him?”

        They aren’t. He’s offering the service for free, isn’t he? A service which among other things, is meant to allow artists free venue to a promo tool he hopes will be as powerful as The Pirate Bay or iTunes.

        The real question is why you are posing a question in a form which can only be considered a rhetorical statement based on false premises.

        “So you can’t answer the question. Thanks.”

        In short, you didn’t want an answer since you already inserted the false premise that Dotcom has to abide by different rules in your rhetorical question?

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Gear-Mentation/100003097514663 Gear Mentation

    HAHAHA, they canceled because of pressure from the MAFIAA. Anybody scared?

  • guess

    wtf. ads not related to music at all and they seem to think they can remove them.

  • JordanKratz

    I just wish that some really smart hackers could break into the MAFIAA and release their shady accounting and other Ripoff Criminal Activities.
    Do a huge wikileak on MAFIAA please ! I would do it but I do not have the knowledge and skills.

  • guess

    Dear MediaWorks

    We don’t like kim dotcom because he is winning in court and he operated a filesharing website. He is a big meany head, plz don’t do business with him. omg

    from
    riaa

  • chris_p_bacon(R.O.L.L)

    he has just got advertisement you can only dream about

  • Trololololol

    Only 20 tb on a 1gbps possibly 2gbps link?? Lol come on, this is some fly by night shit now haha, you lose all your money dotcom lol, time to change your real last name to dot co dot nz ? Lol what a douche

    • SpunkingInTheFaceOfThe1%

      lololtrol.

      Now fuck off, you’re stinking up the genepool.

  • http://www.BrettNYC.com/ Brett

    Does anyone know if MEGA will have money-making opportunities like Megaupload did?

  • icec0ld

    This almost certainly falls under unfair competition practices.

  • Vince

    You learn something everyday. For example, today I learned there are still people that listen to the radio.

  • God 3.0

    lol wut
    people still listen to the you-think-what-we-tell-you-to-think Radio?

    lol HELLLLOOOOO MCFLY… the free-market isn’t actually free? lulz

  • The_Strawbear

    ‘How much does it cost to run a worldwide advertising campaign for an soon-to-be-launched Internet company?’

    I have no idea, how much does he pay TF for all these mentions?

    This KDC obsession’s really put me off this site.

    • FgsFds

      ”Filesharing” news site, numbskull…

      /rolls_eyes.jpg

    • xpmule

      the little jerk offs that pound one out constantly to pictures of KDC is what bugs me.. really puts me off my meal !

      /KDC_IS_THE_NEW_Robert_Tilton.jpg

    • Scary_Devil_Monastery

      “I have no idea, how much does he pay TF for all these mentions?”

      I guess about as much as the middle east paid the average newspaper in order to keep their attention focused on Iraq and Afghanistan in 2008?

      “This KDC obsession’s really put me off this site.”

      Well, I’m afraid if you don’t want to read a lot about filesharing then perhaps this is not the venue you may want to read your news.

  • DRuNKeN MaSTeR

    That’s one (shameful) way to get rid of the competition.

  • xpmule

    He climbed off the copyright trolls cross to come back and save us all from the evil mafia !

    his new service is designed to save file sharing from the grips of evil !

    paying him MONEY is the only way we will defeat the “MAFIAA” !

    we’re close to a public release i suggest all file sharers put the word out to go the bank and start getting your check books ready !

    • Scary_Devil_Monastery

      Or, you know, we could just sit back and see how he puts the other finger in the MPAA/RIAA’s eye.

  • Scary_Devil_Monastery

    Not very big on education, are you?

    I think we should offer you a clue that there are at least five different synonyms on “shit” you might use to keep the audience interested. Simply repeating it over and over again just means you can’t even troll worth crap.

    And, to be honest, I for one am rather happy about the fact that someone who can’t use the queen’s english better than some hackneyed football hooligan from kensington “has no respect”.

    Oh, and incidentally? Since both your grammar and your spelling in general is shot to hell…Don’t try to appear british if you can’t even hack it in your presumed mother tongue.

    Now toddle off and troll wherever you can find a suitable audience to bait, son.

  • BTGuard - BitTorrent Anonymously

NewsBits

Even more news...

  • The Pirate Bay Isn’t Down Completely, Just Having a Few Issues

    Twitter and Facebook, not to mention the TorrentFreak inbox, are currently alive with complaints that The...

  • Pirate Bay Founder Gottfrid Svartholm on Freedom of Speech

    Freedom of speech is a highly valued commodity, but should people be allowed to say whatever...

  • Blu-ray Anti-Piracy Tech Stops Discs and Promotes Purchases

    An anti-piracy system present in all official Blu-ray players since 2012 has received a fresh update...

  • Foxtel Breeds Pirates by Locking Up Game of Thrones

    One of the main reasons why people turn to piracy is the lack of legal alternatives....

  • UK Student Admits Breaching Sony Copyrights With Leak of PS3 SDK

    Last year an Internet user known as El Nomeo leaked version 3.70 of Sony’s Playstation3 SDK...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

PopularArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.