TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

European Greens Want to Legalize File-Sharing, Ban DRM

The European Greens have released a landmark position paper that should guide their policies on copyright in the digital era. The overall theme is a reduction of the copyright monopoly to the benefit of consumers. Among other things the Greens want to legalize file-sharing for personal use, ban DRM entirely and restrict the copyright term to five years.

The Greens / EFA is one of the parliamentary groups in the European Parliament. The group currently hold 57 seats, including one Pirate Party seat held by Christian Engstrom.

This week the Greens released a position paper with their view on copyright in the digital era, which mimics the Pirate Party agenda. The paper goes directly against the current trend of increasing control over copyright, and calls for a society that secures the interests of the public instead of a few multi-million dollar companies.

One of the key proposals is to legalize file-sharing for personal use. “Non commercial sharing between individuals should be allowed, for instance by widening the scope of the existing private copying exception,” the Greens write.

In addition, restrictive technologies such as DRM should be banned entirely, or at least decriminalized.

“It must always be legal to circumvent DRM restrictions, and we should consider introducing a ban in the consumer rights legislation on DRM technologies that restrict legal uses of a work,” the paper reads.

“There is no point in having our parliaments introduce a balanced and reasonable copyright legislation, if at the same time we allow the big multinational corporations to write their own laws, and enforce them through technical means,” it adds.

The Greens also want to reduce the copyright term from 70 to 5 years, with an option for copyright holders to extend it to a maximum of 20 years. The Greens call the current situation “absurd” and argue that society will greatly benefit from a more reasonable copyright term.

“Today’s protection times — life plus 70 years — are absurd. No investor would even look at a business case where the time to pay-back was that long,” they write.

Overall the paper suggests a reduction in the current stranglehold on creativity and a boost for the Internet to allow it to show its full potential. According to the Greens this also means that Net Neutrality should be guaranteed, and that remixes and mashups of copyrighted works for commercial use should be allowed.

Talking to TorrentFreak, Pirate Party MEP Christian Engstrom says that the Greens proposal perfectly resembles what the Pirate Party has been fighting for in recent years.

“I think it’s great,” Engstrom says. “The paper starts off by first going through what the situation is and what the goals are from a Green perspective, and then ends up in the same proposal for copyright reform that the Pirate Party advocates. This makes perfect sense.”

“The idea of copyright reform has existed among Greens before the Pirate Party got involved, but we have helped giving the Greens a push to really put it on the agenda,” he adds.

For Engstrom and all the other Pirate Party employees in Brussels this confirms that they can make a difference, and that the support the Pirate Party got in the 2009 elections was justified.

“I was sent to Brussels by 225,000 Swedish voters who voted for the Pirate Party, with the task to spread the Pirate ideas in the parliament, so that we can one day get the majority for the ideas that we need. This is of course a very big job, but this is a first milestone. It shows that the Pirates can deliver when they get the chance,” Engstrom concludes.

The enthusiasm of the copyright reform paper isn’t limited to Brussels either. Many pirate party members and volunteers will see it as a sign that they can make a difference.

“We know that our ideas are sound for the future, says Rick Falkvinge, founder of the first Pirate Party.

“It is great to see that they are getting larger and larger support. To see one of the seven party groups in the European Parliament adopt our entire perspective as its own is a gigantic leap forward for the civil liberties of the next generation.

“Just like the Green perspective took some time to be fully understood 40 years ago, so will ours. But understanding and endorsement of the pirate perspective keeps growing, and I expect it continue doing so until it is as common sense as acting sustainably,” Falkvinge adds.

The position paper of the Greens can be called revolutionary. However, the group is only a minority in the European Parliament, so there’s a long way to go before it will become law. It’s nonetheless a clear sign that copyright reform is gaining broader acceptance.

Related Posts

Previous Post | Next Post

  • ndmushroom

    Curious to see what the ALDE group position will be on the matter. A few liberal MEP’s have taken initiatives to counter the wave of pro-copyright propaganda widely distributed in the EU institutions, but there’s still along way to go (even in the group itself). PP+Greens+ALDE would probably form the “critical mass” needed for the Institutions’ approach to shift. (and, on a different note, I want to thank the Swedish voters for being the catalyst to this (attempted) change).

  • 4letterman

    How’s Cliff Richards going to manage in his old age.

  • 4letterman

    How’s Cliff Richards going to manage in his old age.

    • Twice Daily

      Fairly good I think. According to his latest battle for extension to copyright on his own works he obviously plans to live to the ripe old age of 138.

      God Bless him!

      • Momo

        Aaaand… a reference to The Picture of Dorian Gray seems highly appropriate.

  • Dsadsa

    Yess, yess, yess, yess
    yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!
    !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • http://torrentfreak.com/ Rob8urcakes

    In political terms this is absolutely orgasmic, and despite the fact that I’m a fully paid-up Member of the UK Pirate Party (with voting rights) I’ll now seriously consider voting Green in ALL relevant UK elections if the UK Greens also adopt this excellent strategy.

    Cooperation and collaboration is better than petty political differences that simply divide the voters and allow the ‘big Parties’ to flourish and conquer.

    The work and determination that Falkvinge and Engstrom etc have done to influence the policies of a mainline Political Party is one of the Pirate Party’s greatest moments in recent history.

    Take heed ‘big boys’ for you’re next and our fight for digital freedom SHALL continue unabated because …
    “Sharing IS Caring” my friends.

    • ndmushroom

      Why? If you can still vote for the PP, why would you vote for another party that was just inspired by the PP? What if we all do the same, and suddenly PP is no longer represented? Will you count on the Greens to keep up the fight? I don’t (and I even like the greens). The two parties collaborating is one thing. Ditching your party in order to support a party that released a document inspired by your party is like those left-wing americans urging Nader to quit the race so that Obama gets his votes (and look where that’s gotten them) :-)

      • Dsadsa

        I hope he means to vote green wherever no PP is on the voting bill, I hope so atleast.

      • http://torrentfreak.com/ Rob8urcakes

        The PP is currently a ‘pressure group’ that’s unfit for political office as a Party because we’re so young and focussed mainly on the issue of digital freedom from the copywrong cartel.

        When mainline political parties (such as the Green Party) take up and adopt our values, we’ve won a major step forward in our political goals.

        But the MAFIAA however abuse and lie to politicians simply to get more profit in their economic World that we the consumers take part in too. Hence the need for cooperation at the political level my friend.

        Get it now, or need more info maybe?

        • ndmushroom

          In other words, you’re saying that since the Greens have adopted the “pirate values”, there’s no reason to support the pirate party any more. Either I got this right, in which case I’ll be waiting for the “Swedish and German Pirate Party to dissolve following EU Greens proposal” headlines (much like waiting for death, or the IRS, or both), or I got this wrong and you’re only referring to the UK Pirate party (I’m not familiar with the way the UK pirate party works, to be honest), in which case thanks for the insight!

        • Devanite

          I disagree, the reason politics is soo extremely screwed up is because its a bunch of fat old people trapped in their own perceived reality, laws about to shift dramatically in canada to make it illegal to break DRM at all, and the ONLY people asking for that law are the minority of copyright corps!

        • Momo

          Attention: The PP is not a pressure group if it doesn’t get any votes!!!

          The only pressure the PP can exert is the pressure of showing that some fringe party is taking votes away from mainstream parties, so those parties need to change their policies to get those votes back. If the PP gets no votes, those parties will have no reason to modify their platforms.

          So if you have the choice, don’t vote for the greens or anyone else who has copyright as their 1000th policy, vote for the PP. Don’t stop voting for the PP until all parties have digital policy on their agendas.

        • Anonymous

          Well… The greens were also “young and too focussed” like 20-30 years ago – at least if you ask those politicians who were “established” back then. The greens were viewed as an insignificant “protest party” just as most new democratic parties. All parties start as “protest parties”! If they had nothing to protest against, and the established politicians would care about their issues… then there would be no need for forming a party.. right?

        • http://otester.myopenid.com/ PiRat

          What you really need to tackle is the bankers behind these evil institutions, until then your just fighting against an endless flow of money straight into the politicians pockets.

          Just look at the owners of EMI to know where to start.

      • test

        the greens is just trying to grab onto votes
        they saw what happened to the pirate party
        i doubt they really believe in this

    • www2

      PP is one of the members of EU greens.

  • Keien

    I vote for the orginal: Pirateparty!^^

  • Guest

    I vote yes

  • MD3

    Sanity in politics: so rare and so refreshing.

  • Pingback: European Greens Want to Legalize File-Sharing, Ban DRM | We R Pirates

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100002567076582 Mohamed Mohsen Ahmed

    “European Greens Want to Legalize File-Sharing, Ban DRM”
    aren’t we all want that? :D

  • http://twitter.com/icanhazsake Ninja

    It’s starting to gain strength. Pretty refreshing. Best luck for them. I’ll be fighting my battle in my country ;)

  • Anonymous

    The Green Party has forgotten ONE thing. The fact that making discs is bad for the environment, than the paper covers, ink etc. (Should help getting extra voters)

  • Pingback: European Greens Want to Legalize File-Sharing, Ban DRM

  • Herbert

    i think we need an election now! those in favour, say AGHHH!!

  • PirateScum

    What else is new? Everyone wants free stuff. I wish I could have a Ferrari for free. Please someone share one with me.

    • Jeff Bekcer

      Once downloading cars becomes an option maybe i’ll share a design with you ;D

      • Anonymous

        That seems already possible. I read one news story where a complete car was made on a 3D printer with only 1 part they could not print out. So downloading a car design and printing it out is certainly in the future. They said it was very efficient with zero wastage due to building up the parts layer by layer to high accuracy. Some assembly required…

    • Jeff Bekcer

      Once downloading cars becomes an option maybe i’ll share a design with you ;D

    • me

      Will do… as soon as Star Trek replicator-like tech for physical goods emerges. Fortunately, it’s easy to replicate files, right now, not in 100+ years. Want a PDF or JPG of that nice red Ferrari?

    • me

      Will do… as soon as Star Trek replicator-like tech for physical goods emerges. Fortunately, it’s easy to replicate files, right now, not in 100+ years. Want a PDF or JPG of that nice red Ferrari?

    • Jmorse43508

      Car analogy FAIL. You and the other trolls here will be long dead before a car can be replicated in such as fashion as to be an identical copy to the original, including functioning the same.

  • Anonymous

    tinyurl.com/2df4ccp

  • Anonymous

    tinyurl.com/2df4ccp

  • ThumbsUpThumbsDown

    Great news. Many great ideas on copyright reform finding a voice in the legisltures through the Greens.

    It would be a huge enhancement to their agenda, if they included a frontal attack on the right of corporations to be considered extensionally real “artificial persons” with rights equivalent to private citizens in proceedings both in courts and in legislatures for the purpose of creating new law. The impact of such change cannot be overstated. This special status for corporations “as persons” does two really bad things to undermine any nominally democratic system: First, it lets the elite (meaning actual people) to be represented twice; once as individuals, and many times through their corporate creatures. Second, it allows corporations through their massive concentration of time and money to crowed out the individual from the political space along with his parrochially “human” priorities. I make the distinction here between granting the corporation “standing” before administrative agencies and courts for the purpose of protecting its interests on the basis of existing, already created law; and the huge mistake of allowing corporations to proceed within legilatures on an equal footing with humans to create and shape the new laws that allow them to accumulate even more political power.

    Three tactical advantages of pursuing change in this particular aspect of law: First, it goes to the very root of what allows corporations to grow beyond their human prupose. Second, it serves to explain and counteract the proliferation of so much bad law and the ligitimization of so much bad and unjustifiable business practice that tortures our rights as customers, shareholders, and counterparties. Third, it represents a meeting ground where activists concerned with different sectors (banking, insurance, accounting, copyright law) can pool their efforts to very effectively attenuate the power of monopoly in general.

  • ThumbsUpThumbsDown

    Great news. Many great ideas on copyright reform finding a voice in the legisltures through the Greens.

    It would be a huge enhancement to their agenda, if they included a frontal attack on the right of corporations to be considered extensionally real “artificial persons” with rights equivalent to private citizens in proceedings both in courts and in legislatures for the purpose of creating new law. The impact of such change cannot be overstated. This special status for corporations “as persons” does two really bad things to undermine any nominally democratic system: First, it lets the elite (meaning actual people) to be represented twice; once as individuals, and many times through their corporate creatures. Second, it allows corporations through their massive concentration of time and money to crowed out the individual from the political space along with his parrochially “human” priorities. I make the distinction here between granting the corporation “standing” before administrative agencies and courts for the purpose of protecting its interests on the basis of existing, already created law; and the huge mistake of allowing corporations to proceed within legilatures on an equal footing with humans to create and shape the new laws that allow them to accumulate even more political power.

    Three tactical advantages of pursuing change in this particular aspect of law: First, it goes to the very root of what allows corporations to grow beyond their human prupose. Second, it serves to explain and counteract the proliferation of so much bad law and the ligitimization of so much bad and unjustifiable business practice that tortures our rights as customers, shareholders, and counterparties. Third, it represents a meeting ground where activists concerned with different sectors (banking, insurance, accounting, copyright law) can pool their efforts to very effectively attenuate the power of monopoly in general.

  • Pingback: EU: De Gröna anammar Piratpartiets politik | Anders S Lindbäck @ Kunskapssamhället

  • http://profiles.google.com/skybon ????? ???????

    Banning something is not an option. It WILL NOT work. Publishers should come to a conclusion of the fact that DRM is ineffective on their own.

    • Anonymous

      If file sharing is to be lawful then there should be no blocks to their copying. Like in transferring a DVD movie to their MP4 player. DRM could well be naturally market removed due to the problems found. However this Green idea is about life where aspects like DRM is banned to promote copying and sharing.

  • Pingback: 3 Count: Going Green | Plagiarism Today

  • Anonymous

    Among other things the Greens want to legalize file-sharing for personal use, ban DRM entirely and restrict the copyright term to five years.

    Sounds like I died and gone to Heaven or at minimum a climax read.

    I would say though that 5 years should be the standard but allow up to 10 years for copyrighted items that are harder to make profit from. More than 10 years is stupid though when if they can’t profit in 10 years then they are wasting their time. Worst yet is removing this item from public use who may well fix the issues, improve the item, and make something more enjoyable.

    The current life plus 70 years is just public trash. Long obsolete comes to mind.

    Let me put it this way. I sell electronic items. Do I expect my sales to go well for life plus 70 years? Obviously no when I work in a free but hard market. New electronic items often have a life of around 18 months before a better item makes them obsolete and sales then go very slowly. So it is all about keeping up with the market and where the very final of your supply you can well sell for less than what you purchased them for. The best price on the best items wins the market.

    Copyright is not a free market it is a monopoly. This explains this stupid life plus 70 years when they just scream more, More, MORE, GIVE ME F**KING MORRRRRE!!!!!!!!!! This is of course not the artist’s goal to sit on the lazy butt and create nothing new. It is the middle men like the MPAA and RIAA who spend so much money defending their profits with lobbying and copyright protections they simply want more years to earn the money back!

    Last up then banning DRM is a start but there are many other copyright protection methods need banning as well like Macrovision and CGMS.

    • ThumbsUpThumbsDown

      Go baby go!! Thats what we tell the carpenter when he hits the nail on the head.

    • http://profiles.google.com/zerianis10 Christopher Kidwell

      True about if you cannot profit in 10 years, you aren’t going to.

  • Pingback: Piraterie pe Internet si nu numai - Page 32 - My Garage

  • Pingback: Upphovsrätt och fildelning: De Gröna i EU ställer sig bakom Piratpartiets politik « Christian Engström, Pirate MEP

  • foff

    What a great f#cking business model. Pay some sucker stool pigeon some money for their creative work and get a 100 year plus monopoly on it! If it is so f#cking important to protect copyrights that long then why is the term for patents so much shorter?

    I like the idea of 5 years but I wonder if copyrights need any term. The only protection a creative person ought to have is like patents that cover obvious and egregious copies. I see nothing wrong with anyone using an authors universe for a story like harry potter derivative works. The only protection needed is to stop obvious rewrites of the original stories. At some point there are movie remakes and yes at some point the star wars series will be remade. Here is the catch if movies could be remade after a short time the original creator would have already got his reward and the danger is if hollywood went crazy on remakes the public would tire very fast of seeing the same story over and over again with different actors. The point is a remake is not a guaranteed success and someone else’s interpretation may not live up to expectations

    The point is creativity does not need the ridiculous protection it enjoys today. Without it a good original work will stand on its own make plenty of money for many many years, People want to see what the original creator had in mind not what someone else thinks the out come ought to be.

    End copyrights!!!!! F#ck the corporate control of our world! Bring the mighty down. Go revolution!!!!

  • Pingback: European Greens Want to Legalize File-Sharing, Ban DRM | TorrentForce Blog

  • Pingback: European Greens Want to Legalize File-Sharing, Ban DRM « Darin R. McClure – The Good Life In San Clemente

  • Anonymous

    tinyurl.com/2df4ccp

  • http://profiles.google.com/zerianis10 Christopher Kidwell

    About time. 5 years is the amount of time that the Founding Fathers of America said was the MOST that something should be copyrighted for, The British Greens are taking some pointers from them here.

    As to DRM, it is something that should have been banned a long time ago, both technological and other measures. Why? Because instead of giving ANY problems to pirates, it only bothers the people who actually buy the product in question.

    Add to this that after the first 3 years or so (the time period when DRM has it’s best reasoning for usage), the companies are NOT REMOVING THE DRM THEMSELVES, so that we can be sure that everything from the multiplayer aspect on the games to numerous other things will work.

  • Pingback: Europäische Grüne wollen Filesharing legalisieren und DRM verbieten | News, Tipps und Tricks von DMI

  • Pingback: European Greens Call For Copyright Reform, Legalized File Sharing, Banning of DRM - Digital Video Forums

  • PRIVACY is priceless to me

    And now it’s the beginning of the end for the useless hypocrite pirate party, just to make the greens take off again before crash!
    Those people don’t give a shit about anything else than being slaves to capitalism and won’t change anything: “‘if elections would change anything, they would be banned”.
    In 2012 we need a good full-scale world revolution.

  • Pingback: Al parlamento europeo i Verdi vorrebbero legalizzare il file sharing | PowerBlog.it

  • Anonymous

    http://www.lovetoshopping.org
    http://www.jerseymall.org
    Cheapest Vans Shoes,Tiffany Jewelry Company,Wholesale Hollister
    Clothing

  • DRuNKeN MaSTeR

    This would be a dream come true, if it get’s passed some time in the future. I really hope to see it happen (especially the copywrong term from 70 to 5 years – or less).

  • https://thepiratebay.org/user/manOtor/ manOtor

    Thank you TorrentFreak! Great read! And fantastic news!

    Although I rather believe, the greens are just after votes, as others already mentioned, I got to say: I don’t really care.
    That is what politics is about – that’s how it works.
    To get a nice big slice of the power cake, as a political party you have to go for votes. Being aware of what the masses moves and adjusting to that definitely shows the quality of The Greens.

    And we should face the fact, that a party calling itself “Pirate Party” will never pull in the more conservative voters.
    So, why not give those voters the possibility to vote for the same agenda as we do without loosing their face?
    What better way is there, than letting a more “established” party adopt our perspective and give those voters a platform to join the cause?

    This is a start.
    This is how things change.
    Slowly but resilient is the motto, as The Pirate Bay has taught us, and as we have proven now!

    Go Greens! Go Pirates!

    Cheers

  • Anonymous

    Well, if I check most downloaded movies list, it’s full of titles old 5 years or more. What a joke. People will download everything they can, as long it’s for free.

    • Fredrika

      You seem to have misunderstood something. The proposed initial five year copyright term has no relevance to downloading or filesharing.

  • Anonymous

    my best friend’s mom makes $77 an hour on the computer. She has been out of job for 9 months but last month her check was $7487 just working on the computer for a few hours. Read about it here CashSharp.com

  • Pingback: EU Greens /EFA Position Paper on “Creation and Copyright in the Digital Era”

  • Anonymous

    http://www.lovetoshopping.org
    http://www.jerseymall.org
    Cheapest Vans Shoes,Tiffany Jewelry Company,Wholesale Hollister
    Clothing

  • Sanity_Vocal

    Wonder what the impact will be on those EU members who have contradictory local laws on the matter. Will the local laws be changed to fit the possible new EU stance?

    Refering of course to England and France’s Three Strike laws.

  • Pingback: Piracy and Copyright Challenges in 1841 Mirror Those of Today | TorrentFreak

  • Pingback: Piracy and Copyright Challenges in 1841 Mirror Those of Today

  • Pingback: Piracy and Copyright Challenges in 1841 Mirror Those of Today | We R Pirates

  • Pingback: P2PTalk » Piracy and Copyright Challenges in 1841 Mirror Those of Today

  • BTGuard - BitTorrent Anonymously

NewsBits

Even more news...

  • Blu-ray Anti-Piracy Tech Stops Discs and Promotes Purchases

    An anti-piracy system present in all official Blu-ray players since 2012 has received a fresh update...

  • Foxtel Breeds Pirates by Locking Up Game of Thrones

    One of the main reasons why people turn to piracy is the lack of legal alternatives....

  • UK Student Admits Breaching Sony Copyrights With Leak of PS3 SDK

    Last year an Internet user known as El Nomeo leaked version 3.70 of Sony’s Playstation3 SDK...

  • Pirates Can Be Identified Despite Sharing IP Addresses, ISP Claims

    Carrier-Grade Network Address Translation is a network mechanism through which many Internet subscribers can share the...

  • Feds Seize Cash from Major Bitcoin Exchange’s Dwolla Account

    The U.S. Government has taken a significant action against the web’s top Bitcoin exchange by seizing...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

PopularArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.