TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

File-Sharing Admins Jailed For Linking To Copyright Works

The administrators of two file-sharing sites have been sentenced to fines and a year in jail for linking to copyright works. Breaking a long run of operators being acquitted for similar activities, a Spanish court decided that the act of linking constituted a for-profit “public communication”. The lawyer for one of the defendants has denounced the decision, saying that it can only be understood in “political terms”.

In common with many similar sites, FenixP2P.com and MP3-es.com carried no content of their own, but instead linked to other locations where content was hosted. A negative ruling against their operators seemed unlikely as Spanish courts have continually acquitted defendants running similar sites.

It therefore comes as a quite shock to hear that the Provincial Court of Vizcaya has sentenced the operators of both sites not only to fines, but a year in jail.

After originally being acquitted, an appeal in the case was brought by ADES (Spanish Association of Distributors and Publishers of Entertainment Software) and Promusicae, the well-known recording industry outfit.

While the court agreed that neither site actually hosted any infringing content, it noted that the defendants organized and made available links which enabled free downloads of copyright works, from which they intended to profit via advertising.

Crucially, the Court of Vizcaya viewed linking very differently to other courts handling similar cases in the past, when it described the act as “communicating to the public” and not an exchange between individuals.

Lawyer for FenixP2P, Carlos Sanchez Almeida, says the decision is completely wrong and can only be viewed as a political statement.

“FenixP2P was a P2P links page that all courts have declared exempt from criminal liability in recent years,” he explained.

“Given the general atmosphere in the country after the internet campaign against the Sinde Law, a statement like this can only be understood in political terms.

“The Provincial Court of Vizcaya did not hear directly from experts and witnesses, in violation of the principles of contradiction and immediacy,” he added.

Almeida says he is considering his response to the decision, possibly to include an appeal to the Constitutional Court and even the European Court of Human Rights.

Related Posts

Previous Post | Next Post

  • Krew SuffX

    What’s the point of them doing this anymore? What a waste of time and money. Big FAIL!

    • Guest

      BREAKING NEWS

      Google’s CEO, Eric Schmidt, arrested for linking (Search, Blogspot) to and hosting copyrighted works (Cache, GMail, YouTube…)

      BREAKING NEWS

      • Baka

        BREAKING NEWS

        Larry Page is the CEO of Google, not Eric Schmidt.

  • IDIOCRACY

    How much did ADES pay the judge? only 2 million… that’s a bargain.

  • Anonymous

    yet again a court has given a sentence greater than what would be given if a ‘real crime’ had been committed. this is getting to be more and more politically influenced, as stated, rather than about the law itself.

  • Pingback: File-Sharing Admins Jailed For Linking To Copyright Works | TorrentForce Blog

  • Jim

    Have I got this right?? They didn’t host any infrnging content, just provided links to illegal content and they might have made some money from it if their intentions happened?

    WTF!!!

    How about checking to see what links to infrnging content Google has as they do make loads of money

    • Anonymous

      You also have to understand that telling someone where they could buy drugs (just because you heard of it) is now to be fined by a year in jail. Even if you never used or possessed drugs.

      But what do you expect in a country that is that corrupt and high in debt. Crisis makes it cheap to buy judges…

      • Hurr

        Not exactly sure Spain is what you’d call corrupt. Public does a good job of showing their disapproval through rioting when any corruption is exposed or even thought of.

      • Anonymous

        “Crisis makes it cheap to buy judges.” Bravo, now spread the word around….

      • http://twitter.com/Gnurkel Øystein Jakobsen

        In this case, the admins did not tell anyone where drugs could be bought.

        They set up a bulletin board in the streets, where passers-by could post addresses of any kind of shop, from regular drug stores to not-so regular ones.

        Anyone see the problem here?

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_FCNK7C55CBUYFVSC5LNWKB322E Buglord

    X does A, X is judged not a criminal.
    Y does A, Y is judged a criminal.
    if this ever happens then it’s a sign of either corruption or serious flaws.

    • http://profiles.google.com/zerianis10 Christopher Kidwell

      It’s a sign of a judge not adhering to precedents in law, is what it boils down to.

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_PFCI5VRUCYT6AVBT3P6ILV3COI Ophelia Millais

      My vague understanding is that the continental European nations have “civil law” systems, which, among other things, place much lower importance on case law (precedent) than the “common law” systems as used in most English-speaking countries.

      • http://profiles.google.com/zerianis10 Christopher Kidwell

        That system has to be one of the stupidest I have ever heard of, all due respect to Ophelia and none to those European nations.

        Two different system, one that adheres to precedent and one that doesn’t? Sounds like a lawyers wet dream.

        • Scary Devil Monastery

          It is. This is one of the issues we generally have with european law systems. US law has it’s own cans of worms but in general it is a very bad thing when you cannot expect consistency from a court given identical cases.

  • http://torrentfreak.com/ Rob8urcakes

    This is what happens when economics (ie ‘big’ money operators) interfere in the political, democratic and judicial processes we’ve fought to achieve and now come to take for granted.

    Those ‘safe’ processes and principles are now being seriously undermined simply because an industry refuses to update its business model and decided to pay it’s political puppets to pass laws and make judicial decisions that go against progress and human development – for reason of self-interested profits and NOT for the future of humanity.

    Shameful. Or in more modern words …
    Epic FAIL

    • Anonymous

      I have no sympathy for the MAFIAA and their Industry of greed and thievery.
      I boycott their Content and only buy it used and physical.
      One of these days the MAFIAA will get what is definately coming to them.

  • Ksieh

    google is going to be the next one to go to the court in Spain, or it should be with this sentence, or even torrentfreak! because of this link:
    http://thepiratebay.org

    lol

    • Anonymous

      Hey that’s not funny, you will get our torrent news site closed down with your evil link.

  • Anonymous

    This shows a big fail.One thing you can do is make sure you boycott al MAFIAA content from ever touching your own wallet.Just be a little patient and you can always find a used physical product.
    Cancel your Netflix,Itunes, etc because MAFIAA will get your money.Cancel going to a theater as well.Take your date out for dancing and a great meal instead.Then take her home to your nice entertainment system with lots of used films you bought.
    And lastly if they sell used films locally you will help your local economy out a lot more in these bad times than just clicking on computer screens.

    • http://profiles.google.com/zerianis10 Christopher Kidwell

      Or just pirate everything and give a big middle finger to these companies, which is what I support!

      They are going to treat me like I am a criminal just for sharing things that I am ALREADY paying for in numerous ways? Fuck that, I’ll act like a damned criminal.

      • Anonymous

        All of the above, plus teach as many people how to torrent and explain to them what their rights are. I’m serious, start teaching, start talking! Enrage the whole world against them.

      • Guest

        The real criminals of our sick society are the banksters!

  • Anon

    Increasingly, the courts are recognizing that the facilitation of a crime, for profit or not, is a crime.

    • Blah

      The shouldn’t all the RIAA lawyers and the like be going to jail as well, seeing as they’ve stolen billions from artists?

      • Anon

        Perhaps. Certainly if artists signed agreements and believe they’ve not received their due, they should act accordingly. Some have and I applaud that. Wrongdoing is wrongdoing and the labels should not be exempt.

        But you obviously don’t know what you are talking about. The RIAA is a trade group. The artists sign with the labels. Apples/Oranges. And pirates copying recorded music without paying anything while pointing to a label is the greatest hypocrisy of all. It’s good the courts are finally finding you accountable to the sleaziest “hide and steal” paradigm in a very long time.

        So good luck with all that.
        Now be a good Blah and waste some more time reminding us all again how infringement isn’t quite the same as stealing even while you take it and pay nothing. ;-)

        We love this.

        • http://profiles.google.com/zerianis10 Christopher Kidwell

          Anon, the only person who doesn’t know what they are talking about is you, as your history of shilling posts shows.

        • Anonymous

          Stop talking crap and build me a place where i can pay for what i want when i want it. Because i still don’t have that in my country.

        • Scary Devil Monastery

          A man watches a detective movie which in great and gory detail explains how to perform a crime. The man follows the instructions and performs the crime.

          The manufacturer of the movie and the studio screening it go to jail for enabling criminal activity.

          This is the problem with assigning third-party culpability for “linking”.

          In fact, linking puts it even one step further. Hence why this ruling is VERY bad and why most sensible courts reject the idea that linking to an index is somehow associated with people then abusing that information.

          All of which we know falls on deaf ears when it comes to certain trolls who’d like nothing better than the law to be transformed into a game of “I say he’s guilty so there!”. That means you.

  • Pingback: P2PTalk » File-Sharing Admins Jailed For Linking To Copyright Works

  • Anonymous

    I have this creeping feeling that those Americans in terms of the MPAA have a hand in this somewhere. Spain has been a big target for them for a while due to the lawful sharing nature of their copyright laws and so they would much desire increased copyright protection.

    This case so has to go to appeal. Best to keep this case in Spain when I am not sure if European Courts would favour this Spanish law.

    What most annoys me about this ruling is this… Someone can see this whole run of court cases and conclude that such sites are very lawful. So they then go and make their own site only to get busted. In court it is like “You do no different to everyone else. They were all found innocent, but we find you guilty”

    In other words the law should always have consistency and a Judge should match his rulings to the rulings of similar cases. To have this Judge go against the rulings of all other court cases highlights that the Judge is wrong.

    At the end of all this you can certainly see how the copyright side ignores Spanish copyright laws and court rulings and continues to harass the market. Well that and the American government trying to get the Spanish government to rewrite copyright law.

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_IZ5BM5GNLA54OADSWGSXAMA7SY Jay

      There’s a really big reason that the US is in this: Rojadirecta. I believe the MPAA is trying to attack them at the source. Next thing you know, someone is going to try the Roja case a third time in Spain after this precedent.

  • Pingback: Un año de cárcel por enlazar, ¿debería ser un delito? - La Isla Buscada

  • Oomg

    and yet again a other futile attempt to stop sharing …. pathetic ….. and the hydra will survive !

  • http://twitter.com/WillTovey Will Tovey

    I have a feeling that this change to finding liability for linking across Europe (here, in the UK Newzbin cases and so on) may be a reaction to the CJEU’s ruling in L’Oreal v eBay, which may have removed some of the protection offered by the “mere conduit” etc. defences. In that case it was suggested that eBay could be held partly liable for people selling (trademark) infringing goods through it, even though it had no direct involvement.

    [Disclaimer; I haven't yet read the L'Oreal v eBay ruling, nor this Spanish case. And I'm not a lawyer.]

    • okone

      The E-commerce directive, with its provisions for the mere-conduit defence, is not directly applicable to each Member State. Instead each EU country implements the directive via their own national law.

      In the UK, the lack of a verbaitim implementation of the directive lead the Judge in the tv-links.co.uk case to acquit the defendants. Although his reasoning was a bit shoddy, since courts are meant to read national law in line with EU legislation, but this is now besides the point.

      What I am trying to say, is that the effect of the mere conduit defence largely depends on how the e-commerce directive was implemented in the country in question. It will be interpreted at this level first.

      I will have a look at the L’Oreal case later as I heard about that one recently too.

      • http://twitter.com/WillTovey Will Tovey

        Mere conduit etc. was implemented via the Electronic Communications (EC Directive) Regulations 2002, regs 17-19 – iirc that was before the TV-Links case; but I haven’t managed to get hold of any of the documentation from it yet, so I can’t check.

  • http://profiles.google.com/zerianis10 Christopher Kidwell

    APPEAL COMING! If other courts have said that this is NOT punishable by criminal law, I see a challenge coming in higher courts.

  • Guest

    The judge is bribed and should be imprisoned for life.

    He is likely also a child molester, and I hate him.

    • http://profiles.google.com/zerianis10 Christopher Kidwell

      Actually, I wouldn’t be surprised if that second one is true. A LOT of people who get into law and ordah fields do that to hide themselves from scrutiny.

      That said, I don’t have any problem with that thing mentioned second, unless there is some physical force involved.

  • Robespierre

    Assault the prison! Bring the guillotines!

    Let shorten all these corporate parasites and criminals!

  • Robespierre

    I forgot this:

    Cut Cut Cut! Cut Cut Cut! Cut Cut Cut!

  • Anon

    It’s not the corporates anymore. Now the actual creative community is fighting you.

    http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/475411-Creative_America_Launches_New_Anti_Piracy_Offensive.php

    • Anonymous

      Boring… That is just a bunch of failed wannabe’s like you JJ.

      • Anon

        From the article:
        “Creative America coalition members include the American Federation of Television and Radio Artists, CBS Corporation, the Directors Guild of America, IATSE International, NBC Universal, the Screen Actors Guild, Sony Pictures Entertainment, Twentieth Century Fox, Viacom, The Walt Disney Company and Warner Bros. Entertainment. ”

        Failed wannabe’s, said the little pirate. lol

        • Guest

          “It’s not the corporates anymore” … CBS Corporation (Illuminati) NBC Universal (Illuminati) Sony Pictures Entertainment (against Anonymous) Twentieth Century Fox (Jews) Viacom (fascists) The Walt Disney Company (financied by Military Industry) and Warner Bros. (Jews)”

          A BIG LOL FOR YOU.

          kill the MAFIAA

    • Anonymous

      From their ‘Who we Are

      Creative America is supported by an unprecedented coalition of major entertainment unions, guilds, studios, and networks, including American Federation of Television and Radio Artists, CBS Corporation, the Directors Guild of America, IATSE International, NBC Universal, the Screen Actors Guild, Sony Pictures Entertainment Inc., Twentieth Century Fox, Viacom, the Walt Disney Company, and Warner Bros. Entertainment.

      Actual creative community? It looks like the usual suspects there.

  • Anonymous

    Looks like those Kangaroo COurts really dont play around.
    anon-tools.tk

  • Chronoss

    HERE is the logic IF a hammer can be used in a crime then showing one in your store hen should also be a crime UNLESS you are licensed , telling a friend where to find one without paying for a license is also then considered aiding and possibly abetting the act of a crime….

  • Pingback: File-Sharing Admins Jailed For Linking To Copyright Works | Links Daily

  • Edmund Burke

    The names of the judges? They are partial to special interests and people should know.

  • Tosser

    If he was a dis-interested conduit then this is wrong, good luck with the appeal.

    However – if he was purely distributing MP3s through file lockers (profit) and using the promise of other people’s work as a means to generate traffic=ad-revenue (profit) then I can’t say I’m too sorry to see the bugger go.

    This ain’t sharing!

  • Tosser

    If he was a dis-interested conduit then this is wrong, good luck with the appeal.

    However – if he was purely distributing MP3s through file lockers (profit) and using the promise of other people’s work as a means to generate traffic=ad-revenue (profit) then I can’t say I’m too sorry to see the bugger go.

    This ain’t sharing!

    • http://modmyi.com/forums/iphone-4-new-skins-themes-launches/740147-neurotech-hd.html#post5637502 Jay

      I don’t think you’re understanding the gravity of what’s going on here – these people are being jailed for infringing copyrights, but they’re not copying or distributing anything that’s copyrighted.

      Think about that. They are going to be torn away from their family, friends, and society, BECAUSE THEY PLACED SOME LINKS ON A WEB PAGE. That is not justice.

      While we’re at it, let’s throw some oil executives in jail for providing gasoline to criminals. Ridiculous.

  • http://twitter.com/AlyssaBlindy Alyssa Blindy

    I knew that the spanish music and software industry developed AIDS; it comes as no surprise. Lol JK JK.
    Appeal appeal appeal.

  • http://modmyi.com/forums/iphone-4-new-skins-themes-launches/740147-neurotech-hd.html#post5637502 Jay

    Google links to copyrighted works. Let’s see these cowards take THEM on.

    This will be appealed.

  • donsan

    Note that Spain is in deep financial trouble and therefor vulnerable for threats and pressure from the USA to comply in their demands – The USA sucks when it concerns their copyright policy – All their influential politicians are corrupted by the music- and movie maffia – Shame on the USA!!

  • Guest

    OTHER COUNTRIES JAILING CRIMINALS? TIME TO BLAME THE USA!

  • Lee

    This is correct, it is the same as tpb advertising enticement charges. SEE the shareware redistribution terms from the 80s for appropriate gains above material cost for this issue. Ship.baywords.com

    • Guest

      FLAGGED spammer

  • Lee

    This is correct, it is the same as tpb advertising enticement charges. SEE the shareware redistribution terms from the 80s for appropriate gains above material cost for this issue. Ship.baywords.com

  • Btu9

    Does anyone know how to VPN another VPN connection? tried it…doesn’t work

    • Guest

      It’s easy dude. Connect to VPN then start a Virtual Machine with NAT connection, connect to VPN from Virtual Machine. DONE!

  • Pingback: Spanish Court Reverses Course: Says Linking To Infringing Material Is A Crime | The Gift Exchange

  • Pingback: The Technology Blog: File sharing admins jailed for linking to copyright works

  • Pingback: Spanish Court Reverses Course: Says Linking To Infringing Material Is A Crime « waweru.net

  • Pingback: Spanish Court Reverses Course: Says Linking To Infringing Material Is A Crime | Gas Rebate Ticket

  • Pingback: File-Sharing Admins Jailed For Linking To Copyright Works | My Blog

  • Sfsd

    Somebody check the Judge’s garage for new sportscars.

  • Pingback: Spanish court: jail time for linking to copyright infringing files « ISP Liability

  • BTGuard - BitTorrent Anonymously

NewsBits

Even more news...

  • The Pirate Bay Isn’t Down Completely, Just Having a Few Issues

    Twitter and Facebook, not to mention the TorrentFreak inbox, are currently alive with complaints that The...

  • Pirate Bay Founder Gottfrid Svartholm on Freedom of Speech

    Freedom of speech is a highly valued commodity, but should people be allowed to say whatever...

  • Blu-ray Anti-Piracy Tech Stops Discs and Promotes Purchases

    An anti-piracy system present in all official Blu-ray players since 2012 has received a fresh update...

  • Foxtel Breeds Pirates by Locking Up Game of Thrones

    One of the main reasons why people turn to piracy is the lack of legal alternatives....

  • UK Student Admits Breaching Sony Copyrights With Leak of PS3 SDK

    Last year an Internet user known as El Nomeo leaked version 3.70 of Sony’s Playstation3 SDK...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

PopularArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.