TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

French Government Mulls Next Generation Anti-Piracy Measures

After pioneering one of the world’s first “three strikes” anti-piracy schemes the French are now turning their attention to other methods of obtaining unauthorized media. A new report just published by the Hadopi agency tackles the issue of streaming and direct download sites, which currently the organization is doing little about. No surprise that filtering, site blocking and domain seizures are being touted as possible solutions to this growing element of online piracy.

France’s graduated response system for dealing with online file-sharing is not only famous around the world but also popular with rightsholders. Those who are repeatedly monitored sharing copyrighted material via peer-to-peer networks can expect a short series of warning messages followed by a punishment.

Since the system only covers BitTorrent-like public transfers, streaming and direct download sites are an attractive option for Internet users wishing to avoid its clutches. But despite the Hadopi anti-piracy agency declaring last year that there had been “a clear downward trend in illegal P2P downloads” but no “massive transfer in forms of use to streaming technologies or direct downloads”, there is still interest in these mechanisms.

French news outlet PCInpact has directed TorrentFreak to a new report published by Hadopi which proposes draconian messages to force streaming and Direct Download (DDL) sites to comply with the law.

“Some Internet sites, streaming services and direct download sites are specialized in the massive exploitation of illegal content from which they make profits for their own benefit,” the Hadopi writes. “This report, showing the state of the ecosystem of illegal streaming and direct downloads, explores different ways to fight against the massive exploitation of illegal content.”

The report, put together by Mireille Imbert-Quaretta, President at the Commission for the Protection of Rights (Commission de Protection des Droits), covers a wide range of anti-piracy techniques, some well-trodden and others more fresh.

Hadopi has always claimed that “three strikes” is primarily an educational effort and in combating streaming and direct downloads the agency begins with the same approach. Internet users should be educated about the “dangers” of obtaining media via these mechanisms through warning messages sent by Hadopi.

Aiming to push the sites themselves towards YouTube-levels of copyright compliance, Hadopi would like them to implement content recognition and filtering technologies utilizing fingerprints supplied by rightsholders. These systems could be used to completely remove content or restrict user access based on location.

However, the report goes much further by suggesting that if site operators refuse to sign filtering agreements with rightsholders and illicit content repeatedly appears, they could be subjected to a strikes-style system of their own.

“In the event that it would not be possible to reach an agreement because of the apparent unwillingness of the platform hosting the reported content [to comply with the law], the public authority may decide to correct the behavior of the platform through an alert procedure,” Numerama reports.

Suggested punishments for sites are varied, including reporting them to search engines for delisting. Google has already taken steps to remove French sites including AlloStreaming from its index in the past.

In addition, sites could be reported to a judge in order to begin a domain blocking process. Once blocked by IP and DNS, Hadopi wants to have the power to ensure that domains (and any subsequent mirrors) remain blocked. Outright domain seizures are also a possibility.

Also, in a move that mirrors more recent anti-piracy activity involving PayPal and certain credit cards, Hadopi wants to hit operators in the pocket by targeting the financial intermediaries of sites subjected to the copyright alerts procedure. This could include suspension or termination of payments but if financial partners refuse to cooperate, Hadopi suggests it could take the matter to court.

Finally, and adding momentum to initiatives underway in the United States, Hadopi wants to strangle advertising to sites subjected to the alerts procedure.

Related Posts

Previous Post | Next Post

  • http://twitter.com/Power2All Power2All

    Copyright is becoming more censorship then stopping it.
    They will never win completely, there will be always a easy way to get your stuff, how hard they are trying, they won’t educate people with this, they just make the normal user going deeper into how to obtain their content in a more advanced way, thus the downloader will learn more how to get data in different ways then before they got blocked.

    Honestly, the trend is pretty easy set to say “if we block, then normal people will stop downloading”.. Down-on wrong, since the people that getting blocked, will find alternatives and come in contact with IT people who explain them the other solutions.

    This witch-hunt using blocking techniques is working the otherway around, it makes normal users going deeper into terminology and discovering different ways….

    Copyright can be used in a good way, sadly, as most professors and other organisations state and showing facts, it’s being abused to the bone.

    • Liam JH

      I have installed the ToR package on peoples machines who have no reason to hide but feel they must.

      • Guest

        “Hadopi wants to hit operators in the pocket”

        And we hit them in the pocket by boycotting their crap.

      • Andrew me

        If it is easy to download magnetic links with tor then the torrenting will continue and no ammount of blocking is goign to help them, when i first saw torrenting software i was a bit confused but soon got the hang of it, the smae will happen to tor, where more and more people will install it and get to know how it works, and as tor is reasonably safe from take-down i can see the copyright owners going crazy as they lose all the tools they have been using. The problem is still that torrenting supplies your ip address to everyone that connects, yes you can pay for vpn’s proxies and other things but i don’t want to pay for this just to find that they have logs, even though they declare not. I will still be in court and they will be saying that they do not want to discuss the situations as you used there system for something illegal.

        So where from here, i am still waiting for anonymous torrenting, completely anonymous, where no person or organization can track me at all.It is the next step in the fight and one that will resolve numerous problems and really encourage the copyright holders and governments to start looking to themselves to start supplying what the customer wants and doing it so cheap that anyone around the world can afford it. The sooner we have anonymous torrenting the sooner we will have better business plans from Hollywood and their partners in crime.

    • nonamthanks

      “They will never win completely”

      your mistake is assuming the goal is to win completely, it is not. The goal is to make it so that average people, on an average day, don’t consider pirated material as their primary source.

      Most people who get blocked will try a bit to get around things, but they aren’t going to adapt complicated TOR / gateway / tunnel / cover my ass style solutions for very long. When it becomes too much work and too much risk to pirate, they will stop.

      • Parasite

        Oh my. Seems like someone has a little too much free time. Talk about being a “freeloader”.

        Oh, I forgot. Your job is actually this.

        Anyway…

        “The goal is to make it so that average people, on an average day, don’t consider pirated material as their primary source.”

        Why would they? As long as “pirated material” is readily available and as long as non-commercial copyright infringement is not a crime, why would you expect that to happen?

        “When it becomes too much work and too much risk to pirate, they will stop.”

        [citation needed]

        That’s like saying “when it becomes too much work and too much risk to engage in financial fraud, it will stop”. LOL. Yeah, right. That’s a HUGE “when” (which should actually be phrased as an “if”, since it’s not clear at all how that would be achieved).

        It’s been DECADES since Napster and it’s never been easier than today to find ANYTHING online to pirate: just use Google.

        So… yeah… I’ll believe it when I see it.

      • Liam JH

        The goal is to maximise profits and to control distribution channels, always has been.

        • Fantastic

          Bingo a free internet with its plethora of non pirated content is a problem for them. Alternatives cannot exist for a industry that turned its back on innovation decades if not over a century ago.

      • Guest

        Two years and millions of dollars spent only to nab one person who wasn’t even the right man? Oh, yeah, I can see how there’s a lot of risk.

        Are you going to criminalise trading thumb drives next? Have fun with that one, mate!

      • Scary_Devil_Monastery

        “The goal is to make it so that average people, on an average day, don’t consider pirated material as their primary source.”

        And in trying to make it so all they’re really doing is to ensure that average people, on average days learn to rely on the pirates to obtain the material for them.

        “Most people who get blocked will try a bit to get around things, but they aren’t going to adapt complicated TOR / gateway / tunnel / cover my ass style solutions for very long…”

        Complicated? point-and-click is “complicated”? Some VPN’s supply a client which basically you run, then from that client run your torrent client or browser.

        And failing an internal client-side solution for the VPN, there are any amount of free third-party software available which will bind your network to the VPN easily.

        As most VPN solutions are easier to start using than the average outlook installation, I can tell you already that anyone even using a torrent client to start with has no problems at all setting up a VPN.

        Tell me, given your standard above, what would you consider “simple”? Is there even such a thing? Tying your shoelaces or installing a firefox plugin is about as difficult.

        You’re basically telling us all of HADOPI is to ensure the people who call tech support complaining the coffee cup holder broke will never use a torrent client.

        I hope for your sake that’s just the argument your copyright church is trying to peddle to the huddled masses…

      • Anyone

        if filesharing becomes too difficult to the average person they’ll just get their harddisk and visit their tech-savy friend, that will hook them up with whatever they need

        I know I provide this service to some of my friends who are too paranoid about lawyer letters and viruses

      • MadAsASnake

        And you don’t think that end would be better served by actually making the material available? It was a stated objective of HADOPI to improve what you call “Legal” online sources. This has not happened, so why is HADOPI not calling these leeches out on that?

      • Gee

        What is it with people like you that think torrents is the only way?
        I switched from torrents to cyberlockers and usenet a long time ago, and havn’t had to use torrents in a long ass time. Usenet is takes just as much effort as a torrent, download your nzb, add it to your usenet client, and NO I don’t pay for either.

      • Guest

        “Most people who get blocked will try a bit to get around things.”

        All they have to do is a quick Google search. That’s why blocking has failed to fucking work, at all.

        “When it becomes too much work and too much risk to pirate, they will stop.”

        Which are two things it can never become, because programmers are always working on solutions to make sharing easier and because filesharers have supreme safety in numbers.

        gg MAFIAA

      • Fin

        But with the IT literate youth growing things aren’t that complicated for the normal user more and more :-)

        • Whatever

          Don’t confuse “IT literate youth” with “tablet/phone using youth”. (good thing no fluids were nearby to spill :-) )

          Most of them aren’t not that IT literate at all. Some pride themselves in not being able to do basic calculation let alone know how to get a directory in a command prompt.

          The difference with the very old generations is that most of youth don’t like DRM but like sharing which is good but IT literate is pushing it a bit.

          @nonamthans (bobmail?)
          If impossible to copy, people will just go on face book to bore each other to death with messages about which tomato to pick in the supermarket. They will NOT buy more media.

        • Shreyas

          Loved the last line. I would bore myself to death watching Youtube rather than pay for media, money which I don’t have anyway

      • markh

        baghdad bob is back in disguise

        • Scary_Devil_Monastery

          In disguise?

          Looks to me the copyright church is delivering these brainwashed fanatics at our doorstep in bundles.

          All of which are so identical in their well practiced blindness and willful ignorance it’s obvious the doctrine they follow makes that of a 13th century dominican monk look liberal.

          Whether it’s one and the same person behind a dozen nicknames or a dozen identically indoctrinated clones reading from the same scripture isn’t really an issue worth debating.

      • ScrewEwe2

        What’s complicated about TOR?

      • downunder

        But if they have no money to buy said material nothing will change they will find other ways to get the FIX they need.. its leading more to controlling the web under a mask of copyright interests

      • Guest

        Tor is not complicated.

        VPNs are not complicated.

        People learn “complicated” things when they need to.

        File-sharing will not stop.

      • Boring Phil

        Criminalising the ‘average’ behaviour of ‘average’ people is despicable.

      • Andrew me

        how about building a tor network into the utorrent install so that if you use the software to search you will be searching a site on the tor network. Make is easy and people will flock to it.

      • Typhoid Mary

        To much work? Its not work, its education. The benefits of educating yourself about getting around all the censorship and tracking is not even comparable to the payoff. And as always new tech will arise becoming even easier when targeted at this specific issue of remaining anonymous. Anonymity will just become part of the torrenting world in the near future, it will be just as easy as downloading the torrent client itself.

    • Fantastic

      Its always been about censorship, piracy was just the excuse to implement it this time.

      • Scary_Devil_Monastery

        In France I can believe that. The Napoleonic code is very much alive and kicking in that nation.

    • taxpayers

      love how the government is using taxpayer dollars to pimp corporate interests. Oh, I forgot, that’s what it exists for..

      http://torrentfreak.com.qr.net/j38Z/the-pirate-bay-departs-sweden-and-sets-sail-for-norway-and-spain-130225/

  • AsakuraSan

    This strike system is bullshit. Do they really think that people who got a strike say “oh, I will buy everything legally from now on, thanks for striking me” they will rather pay for a premium account of a file hoster.

    • Guest321

      We all know how accurate IP addresses are when it comes to identifying an infringer. Innocent people are bound to get strikes for no reason at all. Strikes will only make people angrier irrespective of whether they are guilty or innocent. There’s no way anybody is gonna turn into MAFIAA’s customer after getting a strike.

    • cc

      you have to keep in mind how they view you. They call you a “consumer”. which in their mind puts you on the level of being a cow in a herd. all a cow does is consume grass all day. these 3 strike efforts are their way of getting the herd to move in a direction that they think will make them more money.

  • ???

    They warned you to go on the offensive…

  • cgimusic

    This sort of bullshit will keep happening until content creators realize that restricting access to their content through these harsh measures will just mean people wont see their content, not that they’ll pay for it.

    • boral

      You are right. When will they understand that through these sites, their contents are getting high popularity.

      • Plop

        We already know, but unfortunately for us the middlemen still have enough money and political influence to be given the biggest soapbox to shout from in the mainstream media and parliamentary institutions. But this is slowly changing and when it hits a tipping point we, the creators, will be heard by the majority. It is inevitable. Support us, the independent artists :)

  • TerribleTony

    I still can’t wait for retinal and aurul implants to become mainstream. Then the US movie industry truly is fucked (unless they have worked out a better business model by then)… They’re fucked.

    • Guest

      Actually, you’ll be fucked. They’ll introduce a law for these implants to show advertisements and such.

  • Guest

    Next generation of anti-piracy measures? Here, HADOPI, have some advice:

    - When you get a cut in your funding, DON’T promise to send out more letters. It becomes obvious that you’ve either been receiving more money to send out less letters, or that you just plain suck at your job. Or a combination of the two.
    - For fuck’s sake, don’t spend two years and millions of taxpayer dollars to nab the wrong person. In today’s highly competitive economy you don’t get away with that horrible level of inaccuracy and inefficiency. People will divert money away from you and instead start people that don’t suck.

    • Guest

      One other thing. Saying that your own measures “aren’t oppressive enough” is an obvious giveaway of what your strategies are. My suggestion? Fire your tactical advisers and get new ones. They’re the sort of people who can’t play “Hide and Seek” without screaming, “I’m right here!”

  • Rick

    i hope all music labels will go in bakrupcy, and hollywood to make negatie profits, and don’t even get me started on politicians

    that’s what they deserve for fucking around with the internet

    it will always be free

    PS. Go strike yourselves in the balls with your shitty corrupt laws

    • Guest

      ‘Rance and now ‘Murica.. -_-

      • UraPhake

        Let us not forget that in ‘Murica the “Six Strikes” scam is not a law, but a willing partnership between the copyright monopoly and the 5 ISPs implementing it. But, as most people in the U.S. should know by now, the cable internet industry and Hollywood are pretty much one and the same.

  • anonymous

    what a shame they dont channel their efforts into ‘encouraging’ the entertainment industries to listen to customers to give what they keep asking for! the benefits to everyone, including those industries would be enormous! the cost to the French govt and every other government would be removed and could then be spent on something worthwhile, like schools, hospitals or similar. would that not be a much better move? but then, i am trying to bring some common sense into the conversation, something that these industries just do not seem to have!!

    • platyourpus

      “i am trying to bring some common sense into the conversation, something that these industries just do not seem to have!!”

      Mafiaa and common sense are self exclusive concepts that they will never comprehend.
      the only way forward is to fight them any way that you are able to.

  • DunzRunz

    Never really thought about it like that before, and it makes pretty good sense.

    CompleteAnon.da.bz

  • JordanKratz

    They have Declared War and have now Fired the First Shot.
    The Internet does not Forget nor will it Forgive.
    Ask for no Quarter for you shall receive none !

    • Violated0

      That first shot was actually fired back in 1999 when John Fanning, Shawn Fanning and Sean Parker gave the world Napster and told the entire established music industry that it can “go fuck itself”

      Strangely enough after a major music slump during the 90s, when the general public liked the music less, then Napster is exactly what the music industry needed to reinvigorate the public’s love of music.

      Encountering millions of songs for free allowed people to discover music they liked and indeed many went on to support their favourite bands. It also helped to create a major Indie music market that is now bigger than the RIAA.

  • dondilly

    Claims of success against infringing bittorrent traffic seems as hollow as the UK’s BPI claim that their pirate bay blockade all but eliminated uk traffic to the site when in truth they merely displaced it with the traffic using vpn or proxies (or TOR for html only). The only effect is to increase costs to ISPs for no quantifiable gain to rightsholders.

    • MadAsASnake

      Had they not been so “successful”, there would surely be a few more people “caught”. Therefore, we surmise that the entireity of BitTorrent piracy in France was by one man’s wife, and that torrenting (what – a couple of movies?) cost the ents industires billions. Right.

      • Guest

        Why not? Every ipod in existence costs the entertainment industry 8 billion dollars according to copyright math.

        (Search for “8 billion dollar ipod” on Google)

  • ScrewEwe2

    Wonder how long it will be before Ha-dopey starts rolling out le Guillotine for repeat copyright infringers?

  • http://www.facebook.com/forkingham.melle Forkingham Melle

    and we pay for those people to sit down and dream up cash cow ideas that will restrict our freedom. nothing has changed, except we come closer to rebellion and objection, world war web is but a step away and they do not even realise it, i am shocked

  • Pingback: French Government Mulls Next Generation Anti-Piracy Measures | Best Seedbox

  • XTX

    Hollande is a liar. HADOPI = END of FREEDOM!!

  • Boring Phil

    ‘Education’, eh? Such noble aims. Maybe the public can eventually be ‘educated’ into voting for unbridled totalitarianism.

  • Traveller

    Censorship. The main force behind this shit is just censorship. They don’t like how Internet is a place with freedom of speech and copyright protection is just an excuse. Just think in some of the uses the DMCA has had.

  • Mr_Joseph

    Damn, my shitty country in north africa internet come from France via submarine cables !
    Time to dowwnload TPB in USB stick !
    USA Government go to HELL ! I am poor I cannot spend 700$ for photoshop.

    • Guest

      1000$ for the full suite..
      and Adobe can go to hell with their monopoly and “no discount” policy

      • http://www.facebook.com/jon7272 Jon Holliday

        do people still pay for adobe well go figure lol

  • Who

    “PIRACY”

    I really wish people would get there facts correct about its definition.

    Piracy is considered an act of theft. so how can online sharing be piracy then?

    they also refer Piracy to the unauthorized duplication of a copyrighted works,

    the correct definition to Piracy is to make an EXACT duplicate of ANY works regardless of copyright and claim its the ORIGINAL. so I say again, HOW is sharing copyrighted works over the web Piracy, when the works get altered from there ORIGINAL state?

    • Violated0

      The copyright monopoly has no interest in following the law and it sure has no interest in valid terminology when this is all propaganda with added slander and libel.

      The key words they always avoid being the most valid are infringement, infringer and copies. Instead they aim to link it to worse things like theft and piracy. That also means you waste your time protesting when you can’t educate them in a subject that they already know about.

      We have at least turned the Piracy concept into something more respectable but theft always gets a clear “no”. Still two can play that game with terms like Copyright Cartels and Gatekeepers.

      • xmrk

        Another interesting word is so-called intellectual property. What? You are against intellectual property? Then you are against property, then you are communist or thief. And when exposed to such vocabulary, it may be difficult to escape their way of thinking.

        Orwell should have patented his idea that you can rule the people by redefining the language and rendering them unable to thing “bad” thoughts. Maybe he could have prevented some abuses by enforcing this patent. :)

  • Pingback: In the News.. | TorGuard.net Blog - Anonymous VPN Services

  • Hogspace

    Let’s be perfectly honest, governments back this increasing censorship of the internet on copyright grounds because the internet has given citizens a new way to challenge increasingly draconian government. Don’t kid yourself that the internet is ultimately government proof, at the ISP level they can eventually require secure sign on and shup down OpenNic and alternative DNS systems if they really want to.
    The onlt response will be to kil^h^h^h^vote in representatives who are citizens first and not professional politicians.

    • Guest

      The problem is the game is rigged from top to bottom. I’ve heard stories from a friend that worked as a staffer in Washington D.C. for a few years. Even got to meet Obama when he was a senator.

      There’s too much money and power controlling the game. You can vote for whoever you want, but if that person doesn’t toe the party line (which is dictated by sociopaths, pretty much), then worst case scenario, they’ll never get elected, and best case scenario, they’ll get elected but then be completely sidelined and marginalized for the duration of their time in office.

      My friend went in full of optimism, wanting to change the system from within but left utterly broken and despondent, claiming that the political system in America is utterly to far gone to have any hope of a peaceful, democratic course correction. Said the second American revolution is just a question of when, not if.

      • The Grand Media Inquisitor

        The second American revolution is never going to come

        We made sure of it why do you think the sheeple get fast food and consume all that shit that’s thrown at them they already belong to us (they can’t think for themselves anymore)

        I dare say we should just speed up the pace and force people to consume by mandatory law

        And also create a great firewall to catch any still non-converted and drag them to the machine to make him see the greatness of our nanny-state and convert them

      • Hogspace

        In the modern world there will be no second revolution, as you talk about it. But I agree the political system in the UK, EU and USA is pretty far gone. It’s simply reactionary when you think about it. Government was controlled, indeed populated by the wealthy and the landowners to 1914. It started to change in 1918, more so by 1939 and 45 to mid 80′s was a revolution. Now we are being put “back in the box”.

  • Violated0

    Aiming to push the sites themselves towards YouTube-levels of copyright compliance, Hadopi would like them to implement content recognition and filtering technologies utilizing fingerprints supplied by rightsholders. These systems could be used to completely remove content or restrict user access based on location.

    So Hadopi wants to sit on your board of directors and to make business decisions for you no matter what the other directors believe or want?

    Have no doubt that this is an attempt to get their foot in the door as once they take control it then becomes a portal to stream official media at premium rates. I shit you not when right here they say “restrict user access based on location” which is commonly known as zoning, Access restriction by country for… official media.

    Nice if a company wants to go that route but is not nice to force the unwilling to comply with added punishments if they don’t.

    However, the report goes much further by suggesting that if site operators refuse to sign filtering agreements with rightsholders and illicit content repeatedly appears, they could be subjected to a strikes-style system of their own.

    An attempt to seize market control this is. Control for some and not others.

    Let us not forget that there is already law to handle infringing content called the EUCD and if Hadopi really want to force everyone to comply with new rules then they need to change the law. We will of course be there to stop them.

    The monopoly is hard at work seizing more control and the Government’s job is to decide how little they need when the more they grant the more the public lose.

    Suggested punishments for sites are varied, including reporting them to search engines for delisting. Google has already taken steps to remove French sites including AlloStreaming from its index in the past.

    That was by a Court order. Well I am not sure Google and the others would be willing to comply.

  • anon

    HADOPI is pure BULLSHIT !

    Im french, and I can tell that if HADOPI is as good as they are in their three strike shit, this new anti piracy stuff will make them even more ridiculous.

    The French gov is already pushing the IT companies and other to go offshore with their “tax slavery” 75%, but if they now treat ads agencies, payment companies and others, good luck to keep them onshore.

    Id rather incorporate a companie in China than stay on a country that is pushing business and startups to move out, just because of thei bullshi’in !!

  • Truth

    Why don’t they set up their own sterile mafiaa-net that competes with the Internet via mafiaa-isp’s and mafiaa-nsp’s. And eventually not using the mafiaa-net can be a crime punishable by death.

  • 1hhh1

    Here,France,the discussion is moving towards automatic paying for illegal
    downloads.The thinking is that when one signs contract with internet
    supplier there will be a clause holding you liable for illegal downloads
    and as the suppliers will have your banks details,they’ll just garnish
    your account for the amount which will be average retail price plus bank
    expenses.

    • MadAsASnake

      Yeah – like thats going to work. I would call that “theft” especially if it is IP-based.

      • 1hhh1

        I’ve no idea if it will work or not,I presume if you sign a contract that makes you responsible for downloads on your internet account they’ll just debit your account,ie it’s like buy now,download,pay later.

        • MadAsASnake

          And how will they know what you downloaded (if anything). If it’s IP-based, then it’s you’ll be paying on a vague and totally unprovable “detection”. As you cannot actually know what is happening on your connectio, let alone stop it (short of turning it off), and the “detections” are notoriously innacurate, you’ll end up paying for stuff that has nothing to do with you, or your account. I call that theft.

    • Scary_Devil_Monastery

      I’ve read that. Would have worked in the napster days.

      Today, not so much. You’d have to persuade all the downloaders to go back to a centralized non-anonymous standard.

  • Byte

    If you are French and you voted for Hollande because he was going to abolish HADOPI, you must feel either very angry, or very stupid now.

  • joexxx

    Apparently, the French government has nothing to do. The country is overrun by criminals from North Africa and all they care about is piracy.

    • dg

      what? dude, get your facts straight, there is no such thing as “france overrun by criminals from North Africa”. The criminals you’re referring to have a french passport for the very vast majority of them, and there are good reasons why they have to resort to petty crime and drug dealing to survive: first and foremost, they’ve been left out of society because of the colour of their skin. That should be your source of concern, not so-called criminals from North-Africa…

  • Whatever

    Wasn’t the (drunK) MAFIAA president of France sacked a while ago ? So for the French it doesn’t matter who they vote for ? It sounds like the US system.

    M$ had a nice saying for this in the past (i just changed it ‘slightly’) :

    “From which side do you want to be screwed today”

  • Asashii

    isnt france the place thats hosting the fake Demonoid site with an .mk!

  • uJonesing

    “YouTube levels of copyright compliance”? LoL. Ripping audio from 1080p VEVO vids is a great way to get high-quality songs.

  • Austin Williamson

    Corrected headline: French Government Mulls New Censorship Measures That Will Fail To Stop Piracy, Punishes Citizens Instead.

    Anti-whatever measures fail because they hit citizens, not targets, and drive the “real problem” underground. Failing with the three strikes – where anybody with a wifi router can be hit – the French industry thinks it a bright idea to CENSOR ALL THE THINGS!!1

    Hey, here’s some advice to you, Big Copyright: make it easy to be legal. Duh. Low cost, engrossing, and sell MERCHANDISE, not CONTENT. MERCHANDISE is not easily copied – content is.

  • Anon66

    The French government is putting a lot of effort in to this, which can only be due to the MAFIAA and their US Gov friends applying political pressure.

    Making criminals of the people of France all due to a group of companies. The world is screwed when media companies can buy laws and influence politics of foreign countries.

    The New Zealand Prime Minister got a lot of bad press after bending over for the MAFIAA, time for the same to happen in France.

    Time to make a stand French Citizens!

  • thisguy1337

    How much censorship does one need to implement before forcing the net entity to further evolve.

    Why not make the material legal and fairly priced. Heck I have Netflix, Rhapsody, and Gamefly. I live in America and I have no problem paying for my entertainment.

    But applying censorships on filelockers and p2p networks that are a major source of culture isn’t right and will just speed up the evolution of the net that isn’t in the favor of censorships.

  • Guest

    Control of copywrong is an excuse to censor the internet. I have no doubt about that.

  • Violated0

    People should take a quick look here to see what Hollywood movie making is up to right now…
    http://imgur.com/gallery/71h8J

    Gatekeepers indeed, Money gets the money. Art is exploited.

    • PadThai2

      BUT BUT PIRACY WONT SOMEBODY THINK OF THE CEOS

      That’s pretty sad to read, but I’m not surprised. That’s what happens when money means more than peoples’ lives.

  • TingJing

    lol, like anyone cares about some French Kangaroo court lol.

    TotalAnon.da.bz

  • dg

    HADOPI will continue to fail and cost us money – this has a few good reasons: they’re 5 years behind their supposed targetr, they’re looking in the wrong places, they’re technically not on par with their target and they’re critically understaffed.
    HADOPI has been a joke to all of us since day 1 and i’m pretty sure that no one is taking tghem seriously anymore, not even the French government, which clearly has no interrest in the matter.
    For the rest of us it’s just an incentive to join the french pirate party.
    Finally, HADOPI is an insult to 99% of the french recording and performing artists – before trying to regulate copyright on the internet, they should be trying to set up a fair copyright retribution system, system which is for now immensely unfair.

  • Pingback: Hadopi: spyware contra el streaming y los cyberlockers

  • Pingback: Hadopi vuelve a “innovar”: spyware contra el streaming y los cyberlockers

  • Pingback: Hadopi vuelve a “innovar”: spyware contra el streaming y los cyberlockers | El Tenanpa

  • Pingback: Hadopi vuelve a “innovar”: spyware contra el streaming y los cyberlockers - Marketing digital : Marketing digital

  • Pingback: Hadopi vuelve a “innovar”: spyware contra el streaming y los cyberlockers | #iMapas

  • Pingback: Hadopi vuelve a “innovar”: spyware contra el streaming y los cyberlockers. | Nakamatachi

  • Pingback: France’s “Three Strikes” anti-piracy regime may target streaming sites | SafetyFist.com

  • Pingback: France’s “Three Strikes” anti-piracy regime may target streaming sites | TechKudos

  • Pingback: France's “Three Strikes” anti-piracy regime may target streaming sites | iReadTech - Tech new summary | All the tech news

  • Pingback: #breakingnews France’s “Three Strikes” anti-piracy regime may target streaming sites |

  • SCP-682

    The level of anti-piracy measures these days are on the verge of being paranoia, if they haven’t already crossed that line yet. I mean, this is like the guy who spies on his neighbors on a regular basis paranoia. Taking it any further would just be a good reason to get the people who are pushing for it committed to a mental institute.

  • Pingback: France’s “Three Strikes” anti-piracy regime may target streaming sites | WP Demo

  • revolution

    Here we go, the begining of regulation, more regulation, and to top it of, regulation.
    Where the internet thrived in the past, like small busines’, simple, easier, now we will have more people saying “fuck it, i cant keep up with 7000thousand multi global page book of internet regulation”

    Once again governments of the world, thanks for interfering with natural progress

  • BTGuard - BitTorrent Anonymously

NewsBits

Even more news...

  • Pirate Bay Founder Gottfrid Svartholm on Freedom of Speech

    Freedom of speech is a highly valued commodity, but should people be allowed to say whatever...

  • Blu-ray Anti-Piracy Tech Stops Discs and Promotes Purchases

    An anti-piracy system present in all official Blu-ray players since 2012 has received a fresh update...

  • Foxtel Breeds Pirates by Locking Up Game of Thrones

    One of the main reasons why people turn to piracy is the lack of legal alternatives....

  • UK Student Admits Breaching Sony Copyrights With Leak of PS3 SDK

    Last year an Internet user known as El Nomeo leaked version 3.70 of Sony’s Playstation3 SDK...

  • Pirates Can Be Identified Despite Sharing IP Addresses, ISP Claims

    Carrier-Grade Network Address Translation is a network mechanism through which many Internet subscribers can share the...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

PopularArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.