TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

How To Kill The Music Industry

During The Pirate Bay trial, the music industry placed the blame for the decline in their revenues squarely on the shoulders of file-sharers. Their logic is clearly flawed, but it could sway the verdict if no alternative explanation is presented. So, if piracy isn’t to blame, then what is *actually* killing the music industry?

According to Per Sundin, CEO of Universal Music, the decline in music revenues in the past 8 years can be fully attributed to (read: blamed on) illegal file sharing. If this were actually true, many of us might even respect his decision to go after pirates as fiercely as the music industry is doing right now. However, the past 8 years have seen a lot more changes in the landscape of home entertainment than Per Sundin would like to admit, and some of those changes have had a massive impact on music profitability — much more so than any amount of piracy.

Let us refresh our memories and take a look at what actually happened during and just before the past 8 years:

1. First, the explosive rise of computer and console gaming. This competitive ‘third element’ has appeared in the entertainment landscape, beaten both music and movies to the curb and taken a huge cut out of the music industry’s revenues. Consumers don’t have infinitely-deep pockets, and billions of ‘recreation dollars’ that used to go almost exclusively to music, are now going into gaming.

2. International trade agreements have allowed consumers to buy their music across borders, rather than accepting local prices on music based on the ‘relative wealth’ of nations, rather than the actual value of the product.

3. New forms of distributable media, most notably MP3s but also CDs, have become mainstream. These new media don’t degrade over time and rarely break at all, making music rebuys a thing of the past, and allowing the second-hand market for music to thrive and expand – both of which take a cut out of the music industry’s former revenues.

4. Radical technological innovation has taken place in the field of music creation, processing, mixing, and mastering. Recording hardware, CD burners, music software, and media encoders have evolved to the point where most artists can actually afford decent-quality equipment to do their own recording and producing. Furthermore, this has fostered literally thousands of smaller, specialized studios that are challenging the ‘Big 4′ with lower prices, better terms for artists, genre-specific expertise, etc. Successful artists can now leave the big labels and start their own recording outfits on relatively modest budgets. Naturally, super stars like The Beatles or Frank Sinatra have always had this option, but the recent technological advances have lowered the bar drastically. This development is depriving the ‘Big 4′ of many of their former cash cows, who now use the major labels for their advertising and distribution infrastructure alone.

5. The World Wide Web has become an omnipresent force in the world, allowing cheap, end-to-end distribution of digital music, increasingly cutting out the corporate music distributors, who deal in trucks and CD covers, rather than bytes and bandwidth. With iTunes leading the way (very successfully ‘competing with free’, I might add), billions of songs are now purchased digitally rather than physically, no longer necessitating the big labels’ distribution networks.

6. The total number of radio stations, music television networks and other ‘streaming’ sources of music has grown exponentially, giving music fans a huge selection of free (and legal) music options. Satellite radio, DAB, and internet radio broadcasts have made it trivial for consumers to simply tune into a channel broadcasting the exact sub-genre of music that they feel like listening to (they can even have a stream created for them dynamically, e.g. on Pandora), making the *purchase* of music entirely optional for the casual listener.

7. A massive selection of entertainment alternatives (home computing, console gaming, mobile devices, etc.) have appeared in the home, effectively marginalizing music as an activity. 15-20 years ago, youths would regularly visit each other just to listen to music together; today, that is virtually unthinkable without some form of activity involved, such as playing Guitar Hero or Rock Band, or dancing at a concert.

8. And finally, the music industry itself has embraced the opportunities of digital media, at last letting consumers buy *single* tracks at a time rather than forcing entire albums full of ‘fillers’ on them. Looking at the RIAA’s own sales figures for the past 10 years, there is a *direct* correlation between the break-off in album sales and the introduction and increase in single track digital sales. Looking at the actual numbers, it is abundantly clear that the vast majority of consumers never wanted to buy full albums in the first place, but were merely forced to by the lack of affordable single-track media. Now that the digital revolution has arrived, countless millions of 16-track album sales are being turned into 1- or 2-track sales, *decimating* the former revenues on music. THIS is the real reason why the music industry is hurting.

In other words: The “it’s common sense” argument that the music industry is peddling in their attempt to tie the declining revenues to piracy, simply doesn’t hold. It is not as clear-cut as the industry believes; the true reason for the decline is something they are still unwilling to face, but will have to face sooner or later:

The fact is that the music industry’s revenues have been artificially inflated for decades because of limited consumer options. The last 15 years of innovation have lifted those limitations, effectively leaving the music industry with an obsolete, defective business model of monopolized production technology, forced album bundling, and almost nonexistent competition in the realm of home entertainment. What is happening now – the decline of music profits and the piracy witch hunt by the music industry – is merely the panicked struggle of a dying business model, a complacent industry’s refusal to accept its diminishing role in a digital world. The pirates are not the reason, and the decline is the not the disease. It is the cure.

This is a guest post by Jens Roland. Jens is a computer scientist by training, but a technology forecaster by trade. He has worked at international think tanks as a consultant and researcher in emerging technologies and has written more than 300 articles and a book on the subject.

———————————————————————-
DATA: Net value of shipped music, in billion dollars

1991 7.83
1992 9.02
1993 10.0
1994 12.1
1995 12.3
1996 12.5
1997 12.2
1998 13.7
1999 14.6
2000 14.3
2001 13.7
2002 12.6
2003 11.9
2004 12.3
2005 12.3
2006 11.8
2007 10.4

(source: RIAA’s annual reports)

Related Posts

Previous Post | Next Post

  • jono

    while 1-2 tracks may be downloaded by the vast majority of people.
    It dosnt make the rest of the album filler unless you only talking about the main 4 dinosaurs

  • Max

    wow, this is one of the best articles i’ve seen on this site. Kudos to Jens Roland (Y)

  • http://www.eZee.se www.eZee.se

    good article and couldnt agree with you more on some points like the ituntes one… infact we wrote about this a little while back:

    ezee.se/articles-blog/2008/03/27/why-itunes-napster-etc-are-the-real-culprits-in-killing-cd-sales-and-not-pirates/

  • Brian P

    Definitely. Thought you should title this “How the Music Industry is Killing Itself.” The industry’s resistance to change and new technology is finally catching up with them. If the ‘Big 4′ had embraced what was happening with file-sharing and the Web ten years ago, when students like me were using FTP searches to find music files we liked and Napster was just starting to grow in popularity, they could’ve completely shaped how music file-sharing developed. Instead they’ve wasted the last five years in a fruitless campaign to sue everything that’s happened since then out of existence so that their weak pay for play stuff they have online becomes the only option. But it’s too late for that.

  • bacon

    While the explanation in the article is almost certainly true, It still doesn’t give thepiratebay the right to decide how it should be done. Music is still the property of the artists/labels and they should be able to choose to distribute it however they like, they’ll eventually learn to do it right even if it takes time.

  • Adam

    They should be blaming their loss of revenue because they are making a shitty product.

  • truth

    I have not downloaded an music since napster died and I ain’t bought a CD in almost as long. With modern living there is little time to just sit there and listen to music. Overpricing and high quality digital home entertainment is killing the music “industry”.

  • LMG9

    I second Max’s comment. What a fantastic read.

  • EOTW

    I tend to agree that it’s the single track mindset that hurts the most because I think folks really aren’t buy ing whole albums anymore. Personally, the artists I listen to are AOR, so I always DL the full CD. That being said, I can’t remember the last time I actually bought a full CD of anything.

  • CWagner

    Not entirely true a lot of non-mainstream listeners love albums. Oh, wait, non mainstream music is for the biggest part not handled by the big 4… nevermind.

  • http://www.eZee.se www.eZee.se

    “It still doesn’t give thepiratebay the right to decide how it should be done.”

    TPB has not decided for anyone how its done, its just one in a long list of sites that offer a service along the chain to do it.

    If a genie made TPB disappear you think the chain would be broken? if you really do…. then i am wasting my time writing even this.

    cheers,
    -eZee.se

  • g

    So, filesharing of music became popular around 1999.

    And the decline in music sales began in the same year. Are we supposed to believe that this is a coincidence?

    Sure, piracy is not the only reason for the industry’s decline. Yes, the industry benefited from the fact that people were forced to buy albums when they just wanted a single. A certain amount of “market correction” was inevitable, but piracy is still a big factor.

    1991 7.83
    1992 9.02
    1993 10.0
    1994 12.1
    1995 12.3
    1996 12.5
    1997 12.2
    1998 13.7
    1999 14.6
    2000 14.3
    2001 13.7
    2002 12.6
    2003 11.9
    2004 12.3
    2005 12.3
    2006 11.8
    2007 10.4

  • Jens Roland

    #12: Actually, the decline began in 1994-1995, with a little spike in 1998. I’ll posting a chart that shows it better tomorrow.

  • zkello

    you should get this to the pirate bay for the case. This makes some great points about the music industry.

  • Jaime H

    I would have to add DRM in there. There has been such a backlash at DRM in music, movies, and games, that many people resort to their corresponding cracked counterparts. However people get them, whether direct download or file sharing, DRM I believe has put a dent in sales. Their full control of hard media before has really left many of these industries struggling to get that control back. That is how they push us into buying more for less.

  • Oz

    #12 must not have read the article. Yes the decline coincided with the start of major piracy, but the start of piracy coincided with the advent of easily transferred digital music. Piracy just got to it before the industry did. It still comes down to the fact the people can get it easily so they will. To say it again, the industry is just failing to keep up with the technology while piracy is flourishing with it. If they would keep up with the technology then most of their problems would be non-existent. Information becomes easily available, but the industry does not utilize it, so someone does. That does not make the problem the fault of those who utilized it first, but rather the problem of those that refuse to use what is popular.

  • Old Hippy Dude

    One should also look at population trends regarding the numbers of teenagers and others who enjoy music. Also, recent economic trends have an effect. When on unemployment, tunes are secondary, at best.

  • Anonymous

    Another factor is the second hand market.

    Before the Internet, it was pretty much limited to thrift stores, flea markets, yard sales, and the ‘used’ bin at brick and mortar shops. It was limited to places you had to physically walk or drive to.

    But now you have eBay, Amazon, and Cragslist among thousands of others. The brick and mortar shops have morphed into online stores. You don’t don’t even have to leave your chair anymore to buy second hand music and movies, and the days of them being all scratched and worn are over. You can get these things in brand new condition, still sealed. And even then, they’re usually cheaper than retail.

    If there’s a CD or DVD I want to own an official release of, but buying it would help support the IFPI/RIAA/MPAA etc., I just get a second hand copy of it off some website.

    And for the average person, if the movie doesn’t stutter and the music doesn’t skip, then who the Hell cares if it’s second hand? It’s a better price than buying it new, so why not?

    Of course, the funniest thing is, they actually HAVE tried to kill the second hand market before. Remember when the MPAA tried to popularize disposable, one-use DVDs that self destructed 24 hours after being exposed to air?

    Man, that chit was the stuff of legends.

  • very nice post

    Excellent post, I was beginning to wonder how torrentfreaks mediocre authors came up with such a high calibre post

  • nesomumi

    @ bacon

    “they’ll eventually learn to do it right even if it takes time.”

    nothing get’s eventually done if you don’t press the issue.
    and if you are bad musician that can earn dollars, learn to work dude, i will not cry for, as you are not crying for me. in the real world this is called “though luck”.
    and the argument “you don’t have to buy it” dose not stand, because every county have a tax on television, and from that tax majority of so called artist and push overs are feed.
    this is revolution baby, you don’t like it, your problem.

  • http://www.10ch.org/ www.10ch.org

    “While the explanation in the article is almost certainly true, It still doesn?t give thepiratebay the right to decide how it should be done.”

    The Pirate Bay does not decide. It is just the way it is.

  • http://www.eZee.se www.eZee.se

    Anybody else upset/notice that the industry has made 200 BILLION DOLLARS in that chart?

    Those gangsters have made more than 20x times the money it would take to end world hunger TODAY (27-Feb-2009).

    Then they go after collage kids, single mothers, homeless people, pre-teens, people with fatal illnesses etc etc

    “Pirates” will rather bite a bullet than ever “contribute” to any of those scumbags ever again…, and btw; they have the gall to call US pirates!

  • SeanP

    Another major factor is the quality of music being produced today by the big 4. It’s crap that’s not engaging an audience any more. There’s hardly a high level of ‘classics’ being put out any more. Few and far between.

    Make a better quality product and consumers will want to pay for it. Pretty simple really. It’s the same old story …. stop blaming others for your problems!

  • Jens Roland

    #22: I see your point, but remember that the data represents revenues, not profits. The industry also *spends* gargantuan amounts each year, so those $200bn aren’t exactly hiding in a Sony/BMG money bin somewhere.

  • Agreed

    Probably the best, sensible, non-biased article I’ve read here. You should get this guy posting more often. Smart fella.

  • Larry

    The stupidity of their so called CEO
    ‘s for one. Still expecting CD sales? WTF still owns a CD player?

  • Aroll605

    I agree. Unfortunately, there is more at stake here than just profit. I feel like a corporate control is also at stake at the trial. Corporate giants want to show that they control the world and want to limit our freedoms as much as possible, to force us to follow their rules, which eventually either leads to domination or profit.

    They try to follow the similar scheme as Microsoft or Apple (however, it is most likely the other way around, since the music industry was here before the two companies mentioned above) to simply control our actions.

    The exact contrary is done by people, such as you and me (pirates, hehe), we share, we make everything profitless and free (as GNU/Linux does, Ubuntu, my recommendation to you all).

    They fear “free” more than anything.

    ~Aroll605

  • Simon

    Most people don’t want to break the law but until the industry prices music fairly, piracy is and will be the people’s protest. Yes, there will be people who will always steal but most people are not thieves by nature. If the industry wishes to end piracy then the product has to have more value. A physical product can’t be priced at almost the same rate as a digital version. Either the physical product has to be better or the digital cheaper. If the industry dropped it’s price to pennies a download, most people would not risk breaking the law and download legally. When the industry realizes this, piracy will end.

    Remember film88.com? They offered to run an online download service for Hollywood before piracy became rampant. Hollywood turned them down for fear of piracy and soon after good quality pirated movies became easy to get online. Hollywood offered no such similar service and still doesn’t. They were given the chance to provide the service but chose to leave a void that was inevitably filled. Stage6.com recently closed it’s doors, another example of the technology being available to the industry but the industry not taking advantage.

    I stream rip music, which is legal in the US and watch Netflix (windows only!!) and cable channel websites in an attempt to stay legal. Piracy still offers a better service and is free. I choose to have a lesser service and pay to do so. Until I see the service I pay for improve beyone that of piracy, and provided at a fair price, I cannot imagine sites based around piracy will disappear.

  • mister_playboy

    Great article… to the authour, dude, shouldn’t you be at TPB’s trial saying this? :)

    Thanks for spelling it out for us.

  • Carl Lundstrom is a Jew Baiter

    Lundstrom is using The Pirate Bay to promote theft from Hollywood Jews. Stop stealing from Jews with your free movie downloads from The Pirate Bay.

  • Ragdrazi

    Well that is some high quality jew baiting.

  • http://www.eZee.se www.eZee.se

    @24,Jens Roland:

    Thanks for replying, taking the IFPI guy at his word (arrrgh, hate even writing that) that would mean 20% went back into getting talent (40 billion! Unlikely me thinks… but i admit i dont know everything about the music making business) then being reallllly generous say another 40 billion (hell, its easier than i thought to be generous with other peoples billions!) for “expenses”… that still leaves 120 **BILLION** with them…,minus another 20 billions for the artists (yes people, you can stop laughing now :D ) and it will cost less than 6bil per year to end world hunger..

    I really liked your article Jens, I hope your next article will _really_ show us how to kill the music industry, I sure as hell want to be a part of that.

  • Luis

    So, repeat with me people: sharing isn’t stealing. If we, as a mature society, start to ban and prosecute the impulse to share with others, then we can stop calling ourselves humans.

    Comparto, luego existo.

  • dancin in da streets

    It’s the digital revolution, baby!

    Gather in the streets and destroy those IFPI CDs and party!!

  • Jonathan Rosenberg

    People downloading copyrighted content from the Pirate Bay are the moral equivalent to those nazis who pried gold fillings from the teeth of Jews.

  • http://www.eZee.se www.eZee.se

    Whats with all the Jews/Nazis stuff?

  • crk

    The industry is trying to make money off of consumer style products in a data driven market. THEY need to get with the times.

  • Ryan

    Hahaha-you’re exactly right!

  • wee

    Funny that no one mentions the research done by the Canadian government showing that file sharing has little to no effect…

    http://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/ippd-dppi.nsf/eng/h_ip01456.html

  • Rob

    Nice try, but there’s a few too many falsehoods, and inconsistencies thrown in…

  • bubdub

    For me it was simple. In 1996 I was introduced to MP3s in University and it got interested in different bands and groups. My CD collection grew from 10-20 CDs to 100-150 CDs.

    I stopped buying CDs when they decided that people who buy CDs are thieves and shouldn’t be allowed to enjoy the music they purchased. Once the first few DRM CDs came out that either screwed up your PC CD Drive and installed nasty software onto your machine, I just decided that my entertain dollars should go to a group that thought I was a valued customer.

  • United Hackers Association

    YOU FORGET ONE OTHER THING ABOUT IT.
    the fact that if piracy were to vanish every single downlaod = a sale, which is false. Like you said people dont have deep pockets. That things are so expensive is the reason for ANY piracy , if they drop prices they will see small increase in sales , but they can only go so far before they get no more returns as such to continue this is folly.
    I think i actually have a solution, if you make UNDER X dollars a year you are allowed X to get.

    However what X is and who sets X is anyones guess this is the “non commercial getting, while saying if you have money you should be buying it.

    However again how can i tell whats worth buying when the “critics” are only getitng paid when they say something positive and rarely will say bad htings as hten htey dont get press , which is also controled now almost entirely by hollywood.

    Go ahead look at who controls all hte media, almost all of it is owned by THEM.

  • United Hackers Association

    OH and in last two years sales in canada thats on the top 5 list of there hitlist pirates has increased over 120% in just two years.

    SO whats that mean

  • Also…

    Also, new music is TERRIBLE if it’s released by a major, 98% of the time.

  • That Guy

    If they want to move more CD’s then they must offer something with the purchase that you cannot get from a download and that would make it worth purchasing

    1. Offer a coupon that offers concert discounts.

    2. An online code used to enter into contests such as “meet the band” or “tour with the band”.

    3. Codes to download free unreleased material from the artist.

    4. Coupon for discounts for other CD’s from the artist or another artist on the same label.

    Just a few quick ideas I came up with. I am sure there are many other things they could do to promote their sales of CD’s.

  • CJ Millisock

    Nice.

    NOFX – Dinosaurs Will Die

    Finally coming true.

  • DJ_Sarcasm

    Great article!
    You forgot to add that in the last few years (possibly could expand that to the greater part of a decade) major label music has become… crap (yes, yes, there are exceptions).

    They try to tell us what we should listen to. They aggressively market singers/groups/rappers with no talent and a formulaic sound. And at the end of the day, even a middle class teenage girl (target demographic I assume because it doesn’t work on me) will eventually realise that just because they say it’s cool, doesn’t make it so.

    Just my opinion.

  • THA ROCKET

    i blame the terrible decline in QUALITY of music these days, coupled with the fact that youngsters can blatantly see how the music industry profits from refusing to evolve their distribution method.
    MY TWO CENTS:
    i would absolutely love to see a torrent tracker, run by ALL co-operative record companys, allow their users to upload and share any album they like, with admins seeing to the stats and the appropriate companys getting paid respectively.
    I GUESS FAIR PRICING WOULD BE
    20 euro to join the community FOR A YEAR.
    get some boardroom ‘johnson’ to chew the stats and grind out a powerpoint presentation.
    projection: SUCCESS.

    alternatively, try lobby and jail people, definitely the more expensive/dull attempt.
    and on that note, Y’ALL CANT CATCH MAH!

  • Dr.Death

    I own at least 100 CD’s which had an average retail price of $13.99+ when I bought them over the years. Many times it was for 1 or 2 songs. During that time I’ve had CD’s which were stolen out of my car, lost or destroyed – and those wern’t copied yet it’s music I paid for. With the advent of digital I am able to buy only the songs I want at a fair $1 per and guarantee that I won’t lose the media.

    If the RIAA wants to know why their profits have fallen, it’s beacuse the public got tired of paying for a piece of plastic that contained only a few songs they wanted, and offered no guarantee they’d be able to maintain the product they paid for. For them to think we’re suddenly going back to the 1990′s distribution model is absurd.

    The movie industry really has nothing to stand on in this regard since 2008 was a “record” year for revenues.

    Kudo’s to the writer of this article.

  • I Bash Scientology in my Spare Time

    On the comment on video games, I have frequently experienced times when I found a new artist or even just a song from a video game or it’s trailer.

    Weird.

    But good article. I just hope I can wait for these old coots to die off with the last generation and get some new, fresher ideas in.

  • Anonymous

    I am hoping that TPB pulls out of this but we all know it is a drop in the bucket and the culture will adapt and move on if they do not. I was rooting for them because they made it a point to make it a political issue. One camp keeps likening the distribution of copywritten (?) material as immoral and very closely tied to stealing.

    The strongest comment and thesis I have read has to do with it has the same end result, something you did not pay for ended up on your computer that you would have had to by the OLD business model.

    I agree.

    The entire business model to charge for something that can be reproduced infinitely at no cost is coming to a very swift end.

    Musicians will still make music, but imagine that, they will have to do it more often than once every 3 years.

    I pay for a movie ticket and see movies on the big screen because I like the experience. I buy all my games (PC) at full or near full price if they get a good review and are from a reputable studio. I do not pirate games.

    I do not preach to others and I strongly believe that each individual has the right to determine what is “right” and “wrong” for them. If I steal something from a store I know I would feel guilty about it. If I killed someone I know I would feel bad and guilty. This is our conscience talking to us.

    Why doesn’t it say anything when I download a work from an artist that has been dead for 30 years? Or I movie I saw 3 times in the theater?

    Stan on your imaginary moral mountain and preach your point of view and set of morals.

    To all the artists out there, yeah, go ahead. The biz is so tough you would rather work a normal 9-5 job the rest of your life. I welcome you to do a hard day’s work for once.

    “supply and demand”

    -the supply is infinite, the only logical result is the cost when divided by a finite demand will be infinitely small.

    Re-structure the business model. Give us something other than an unenforceable “right” to listen to a performance someone did once in the existence of the universe. Find something people want *as well as* the infinite supply and they will pay for it.

    Do not… and well, continue on this silly road of … lol *ahem* corporate morals, rules, and laws.

  • Anonymous

    And one other thing. The “shh, quiet down” -or they will take their ball and go home (musicians/artists) argument is moot. I have never missed a song that never existed.

  • Anonymous

    Or here is a f-ing novel idea. Why doesn’t all the butt-hurt artists subsidise their impossibly difficult hard times without CD sales by … *gasp* TEACHING MUSIC. Who f-ing wouldn’t kill to get into a school or college that has classes taught by members of (fill in band)? It kill two birds with one stone. It would provide a very finite service people would pay through the nose for. And it would revitalize the whole concept of musical education.

    I could give 2-shits about any middleman between the consumer and the artists. So I don’t even offer them any ideas and don’t care if they rot.

  • Keith Cody

    You left out that consumers have a fixed amount of money to spend on entertainment. You only have so many dollars a month. With the growth in the internet and cellphone use, consumers have chosen to spend there dollars on other things. They used to spend it on X number of CDs and $19.95 a month on dial-up. Now they spend $35 a month on dial-up and that’s one less CD each consumer buys. Now how much has the average cellphone bill increased. And cable? etc. Don’t forget the substitution effect. Also, a smaller total quanity of CDs have been made available. There are less albums. And the average cost per CD has risen. Combine an increasing cost and a decreasing amount and you have a shift in the demand-supply equilibrium, equaling less dollars spent.

  • John Jones

    Personally, I cant think of a better industry to kill!

    be-anonymous.us.tc

  • Anonymous

    Beautiful article! This info will go extremely well with the project I’m working on.

  • don2002

    How bout this; the top touring groups have been the rolling stones, eagles, AC DC and Madonna. All of the were big in the 80′s. The great unwash masses don’t all listen to rap or hip hop. Country has all ways been solid and are carried on smaller labels. The big 4 like the newspapers have failed to adopt to the internet and will all fade away.

  • stymus

    Ah,could it be that a lot of the music just sucks?

  • jw

    It used to be that if you wanted to sell a recording of your music you needed to have a contract with a record company that would cut your music onto vinyl and market it. Now every local band I see has it’s own CDs that they create and sell themselves. I wonder how much revenue flies below the radar – this might well make up for the decline in the official sales numbers. It might be interesting to tour Stockholm to collect CDs from local bands that aren’t represented by the big record companies and show up with them in court to prove the point that it’s not so much declining sales as a shift in sales.
    jw

  • Simple

    The sharp decline of profit of the record company is due to online service such as pandora or grooveshark that allow the user to stream there favorite songs freely without having to pay. These services are FREE and hurting the music industry. Also the companies failure to adapt to the ever changing technological landscape.

  • Anonymous

    “So, file sharing of music became popular around 1999. ”

    I was just finishing high school in 1999 and p2p was barely there. Don’t forget there was no where near the broadband boom of today. You still had 56k dial up and bit torrent was not even invented yet let-alone widely distributed.

    Sure, you had kazzaa or napster, or whoever wasn’t sued into oblivion at the time. But P2P was at best a tool to find those rare not-yet-released songs *remembers looking for a song from sigur ros that was not available anywhere.

    Also, the ipod hadn’t been invented yet.

    So, all those 16 year old girls were wasting their hours away infront of their dad’s computer listening to the latest from blah in 128kbps and cutting into the big 4′s profits?

    There are still a-holes today on TPB or wherever “mounted image won’t install, where do I find codecs, blah blah plays but no sound, what is .flac?” And you are suggesting 10 years ago this “scene” was popular?

    Give me a break.

    Is it even mildly possible the indicated decline could be linked to the corresponding earnings boom in the videogame industry?

    NAAAAAAH.

    Stop making shit up.

  • wlmorgan

    Lets not forget the price fixing scheme that was abandoned in 2000 that was artificially keeping prices higher. If you factor that it in and factor in inflation (they are using nominal values from what I can tell) their sales were falling long before widespread file-sharing was even possible. Really it’s a piss-poor argument they’re using.

  • Pingback: Filesharing does not kill the music industry

  • UltraLeetJ

    exactly, and these people want internet radio to go away. I doubt these guys are tracking old things like songs from Brazilian artist Tania Maria, or what about the alum your friend makes? It seems as though the crappiest music (the one you can get on the top 100 charts of these companies) is out there in such positions because of really nice boasted propaganda. Sometimes I hear some kind of grunting with some kind of snorting, which fits a beat and creates some kind of rhythm and then they call that kind of stuff the top 1 song for a consecutive 14 weeks, the most sold hit, or some other thing. Its kind of funny how they also are so picky. For instance in order for a person to get signed up with those labels they have to prove they have sold like millions (and of course hand them over to them) along with cds so that they can manage the artist. In my opinio what the music industry should do as an industry is to specialize and at least please have more knowledge in music. Having a good deal of business knowledge helps but if there was more culture I don’t think this business would be doing so badly, because just like it has been said too many times people want to hear music in which every details makes a difference! not mmusic that is bought 500 times a week.

  • Abhishek

    Beautifully written article. Kudos to Jen =]

  • Anonymous

    Maybe because the music and movies of today suck?

  • J

    whats killing the industry? how bout bad music

  • rear pirate

    One of the reasons I no longer buy CDs is CDs are mastered poorly today. No dynamic range and tons of clipping. That’s not worth my money.

  • Taylor

    Fantastic article! While most readers of this site are probably aware of the history, seeing it packaged like this is pointed and fascinating.

    * Check out my company
    http://www.strategicblend.com

  • Pingback: How To Kill The Music Industry | TorrentFreak | Spooky action at a distance.

  • KTM EXCF 250

    Very nice article.

    ———-
    TPB FTW
    ———-

  • Jesster King

    one thing you all haven’t noticed music is no longer for actual listing, its mostly just there for people with crappy lives to focus on and just ignore their problems. that’s why all this retarded crap that sucks sells.

  • moulin1

    Stop calling file sharing “illegal”. It isn’t. I don’t see the point in confessing to a crime you didn’t commit. Stop doing that.

  • Pingback: overflowlegal.com

  • United Hackers Association

    3 STRIKES LAW COMING TO QUEBEC , CANADA VIA VIDEOTRON

  • xdudex

    Excellent article!

    Also, mainstream music is fucking horrible, what a piece of garbage…

  • DES

    The argument of right and wrong is totally moot IMHO.
    Filesharing exists and that is all there is to it.
    Whether is TPB or else.
    At this point I can plan to share all music with all my buddies on Facebook- what is the RIAA gonna do about it?!
    A stupid waste of everybody’s time and a huge waste of cash- that us what that trial is!
    The music industry is trying to save face, but we all know that ship has sailed.

  • UraPhake

    Long before the iPod, there was the Diamond Rio MP3 player.

    Guess what? They were sued by the RIAA.
    http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/property00/MP3/rio.html

    http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0CGN/is_3718/ai_55362780

    Let’s also not forget what happened to Digital Cassette Recorders. Threats of lawsuits agains the DAT manufacturers forced the introduction of “SCMS” (something the Diamond Rio lacked and they used as a basis for their suit against them). Even though the manufacturers gave in to their demands, the recording industry didn’t produce pre-recorded DATs and the market for the machines died.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serial_Copy_Management_System

    The RIAA is all about destroying anything new that they feel threatens their Golden Goose. Nothing more and nothing less.

  • roller

    You bitch about the money the big 4 make.

    It has been suggested that the website is extremely profitable, and that The Pirate Bay is more engaged in making profit than supporting people’s rights. The website has insisted that these allegations are not true, stating, “It’s not free to operate a Web Site on this scale,” and, “If we were making lots of money I [Svartholm] wouldn’t be working late at the office tonight, I’d be sitting on a beach somewhere, working on my tan.” In response to claims of annual revenue exceeding $3 million (pasted from wiki)

    It seems that these boys are a little more concerned about there wealth than “you rights”, or the rights of those who actually did the work to make those songs.

    Oh I guess it is free to operate a record company unlike a website of their size.

    Grow up and quit stealing.
    A damn song cost 99 cents. (SAVE UP)
    Apparently all the music is crap these days so it couldn’t cost much.

    I think though, that what it is, is that you people really believe that you are entitled to it.

    Is that not Socialism?

    * Good article Jens *

  • t-bone

    yeah man those guys suck

  • chopper

    pirate bay sucks man

  • Roger

    One year ago, i downloaded 12 album in mp3
    format from the TPB ” users “.
    I did like the group and their music so much so i bought all the album on CD’s from a local store.
    I do not like the mp3 format because of the bad quality, but as for listening and find new groups i think the mp3 format is okay.
    So of course i did steal those 12 album.
    But the result was finding a new group and purchase all of their album on CD’s.
    Whitout the TPB i had never found this group.

    So stealing can be god thing !

    I think the best way would be to put a TAX on the broadband as Roger Wallis was talking about and let pepole download what they want and let that TAX go to the musicans and movie makers.

  • Pingback: meneame.net

  • senow

    I would add that you can now test the music before buying it. Before the internet, you would buy an album based on hearing one or two songs from it, only to find out that the rest of the album you bought was crap filler music. Now you can determine that the rest of the songs are craps filler music and avoid wasting money on buying a whole album/CD. Being able to test the quality ahead of time has reduced the purchases of crap music.

  • SJ

    there’s too many issues with broadband tax…

    you might want to have a little read here: http://blog.brokep.com/2007/12/06/the-problems-with-a-flatrate-system/

  • DaveC

    i liked this article too, someone should read it to the r-tards in the spectrial.

  • Lune

    I can state categorically that my almost none existent music consumption is down to the high price of console games, After buying the odd game there just isn’t enough money left to pay for music too.

    As mentioned, consumers do not have infinetly dep pockets, there is only an all to painfully limited amount of money available for entertainment product, and for me, feeding my PS3 is more important to me. Sony isn’t going to get £49 for a game and then £12 for an album, I ain’t got that sort of money.

  • Kitten

    File sharing aint killing the music industry, bad music is

  • charlie

    the second hand music market and CD’s are both dead now. The main question was around in the sixties: If I take a product that I own, make a copy of it and give it to someone…. Is that wrong?

  • Zcreem

    It has been shown that down loaders buy more music than anyone else, also we now have access to far more bands than ever before, circumventing the big labels and their cash cow.

  • fibre-h

    Only 2 things are killing the music and movie industry .. Greed (Who wants to pay for a crappy product?)
    Greed is everywhere, lets stomp it out. Copyright laws were written by whom? Lawyers?? What does a lawyer have in common with greed?

    Have you gone to a movie and wanted your money back ?? Lately i have seen a lot of crap movies.. i feel badly for the folks who forked out 50 bucks to be made a fool off.

    Lastly if god created the universe i am assuming he/she created the ability for the human race to share the items in question.. i can’t for the life of me see how money justifies wrong doing when no one person can claim the copyright of a
    0 or 1 .. digital creation in a pattern as well is not copy written material.. it is so absurd , next thing you know the air you breath will have copyrights..

  • 1984

    Brilliantly written article, a joy to read.

  • Kamina

    The other thing is they expect you to pay CD prices for a ‘lossy’ format that sounds like crap on high end audio equipment as it is missing lots of the frequencies that give music life. Apart from lossless codecs (and MP3 is the most popular format anyhow) this should be used as a ‘sample’ of the music and they should offer lossless for a small fee.

    You don’t even get any packaging or liner notes when you buy a track from places like iTunes.

  • Ralonto
  • wha

    In the past, a person may have walked into a music store and bought an album for no other reason(s) than they liked “A” track, or they thought the album art was cool, or they had other albums by the same artist. There was a certain ammount of impulse buying involved which accounted for a large ammount of sales. People no longer buy things on impulse so readily as they have a multitude of options, one of which is p2p.

    Now, whether people want to accept it or not, p2p does indeed affect music sales, you would have to be an ignorant fool not to accept that fact. When given the oportunity of downloading something for free or paying for it, most people would rather download it for free. That has been proven to be the case beyond a shadow of a doubt, so the question is not does p2p affect the music industry, it is why is it affecting to music industry to the extent that it does. Why is it that a growing section of society can no longer be bothered to pay for music they like. They obviously like it, becuase they are still downloading it, so what would it take to get those people to actually buy music as previous generations have?

  • Spackie

    Piracy exists because of the rip off purchase prices. There is no way I am buying xbox 360 games for $110.00 I have over 20 xbox 360 games in my collection all under $30.00 I suggest the media industry lower the prices to $30 or less and watch people’s game, music and movie collections grow.

  • GJK

    wha, you are making a lot of statements as if they were facts, but they are not. If most people would download things for free instead of paying for them, then there would be no album, no game, no dvd that sells millions and millions of copies. Which also shows, that people BUY things they like.

    But you make it sound as if everybody had all the money to buy everything they want, in a format they want, but then decides to download it.

    Someone who really can’t afford something and downloads it, may do something illegal, but he is not a lost sale and not affecting revenue at all. Everything else is theory, morals etc, but not reality.

    Someone who wants to buy something in a digital format that is not available officially and then downloads it, can’t be seen as a lost sale either.

    If all the downloads of movies, music, games etc. would be counted as lost sales, the calculated revenue of those industries would be many times higher than the total money the theoretical and real customers could ever have. This alone shows that downloads can’t be seen as lost sales.

  • Abersolde

    Great article. Nicely done.

  • Johann

    I haven’t bought music in years, i’m not a fan of a specific band so i prefer to listen radio stations , the money i have i use it to buy more interesting things like video games or technological stuff like cellphones ,computer parts or other activities in sports.
    so they are blaming the wrong people, they don’t see that time evolves, before people used to sit in front of the radio and listen radio novels and stuff , something that is not likely to happen now a days. people spend money in what they consider a priority and music is not one

  • Anonymous

    @(t)roller
    “Grow up and quit stealing.”

    Filesharing isn’t stealing, so how about you grow up and quit lying?

    @wha
    “When given the oportunity of downloading something for free or paying for it, most people would rather download it for free.”

    One word: iTunes. Given the option of downloading something for free or paying for it, a ton of people would rather pay.

  • tinner

    Spot on! I would also add two more things to it though…
    1. Limited number of time in real life to listen to music… Being 30, and working full time with some spare jobs on the side I simply don’t have time to listen to the music except when on a bus (or at work if permitted). If I would not be allowed to listen to the music at work the amount of time I could listen to my tunes would be marginal during a 24h day… There is simply not enough time to sit down and “enjoy” the music as per Music Industry Giant’s standards in a normal person’s life. The other issue is with the process of purchasing the music I want or like… We (consumers) are being fed the bullshit crappy mass-production music for years… Choosing the right piece is difficult already as it is… If I would have to go through all the registration processes, preview 15 seconds of a “new” track and then decide if I like it or not, purchase it, download it and then remember to keep it safe is just too much hassle for me… I much rather prefer enjoying the music by “skipping” the tracks I do not want rather than to make an educated decision (and sometimes a guess) whether at this point in time I will like this or that piece eternally… It just does not work that way – I want to listen to it and skip the moody tracks… If I’d have to buy every track I have on my HD I would be broke all the time and would wasted MUCH more time deciding what to buy… Just my 5 cents…

  • Z

    I don’t buy any music, but I frequently buy video games. It’s interactive content, several hours of fun for about the same price. So why stick with 70-minutes non-interactive entertainment then?

  • marc

    The music industry has been leeching from everyone for years….its only fair that music goes back into the hands of the artists and far away from big business….since all they do is screw people. the internet is free….open source will soon replace most of the best software (which should have been free from the start since windows had so many holes)
    and windows is like the music industry…trying to hold onto a dead business…because art is not a business….its a form of expression…and music is the best form of expression <3

    keep the net alive and kicking guys….im all for you <3

  • Passy

    @45 Feb 27, 2009 at 05:04 by That Guy

    I’ve been thinking the same thing for years. In order to compete with free you need to offer your customers a very attractive product.
    Just reading the comments to this post it is clear that many people still buy CDs because they think of them as a superior product than downloaded 128kbps MP3s. If one looks at iTunes offerings it is clear that many are quite content to buy music in a lossy AAC format with no extras.
    Think of how successful the big 4 could be if they actually tried to sell us songs at the same price as iTunes but included extras like “by That Guy” proposed, coupons, concert discounts or maybe pictures of the artist or even cover art if you bought the whole album.
    On top of that it would a great way for the labels to map out user demographics and target new products more accurately.
    But I fear that it is soon going to be too late for this business strategy to be implemented as free or subscription based streaming services like Pandora, last.fm or spotify are becoming more and more popular.
    On a personal note, I have become a regular user of spotify, a streaming service which offers access to a seriously large amount of music in a convenient and easy manner. I read about a spotify user using a picture of the spines of his CD music collection, on which he added spotify links which he then posted online, allowing him to access his music collection wherever he might be.
    I discovered spotify at the same as iTunes wrecked my music digital music collection when I attempted to transfer some tracks to my niece’s iPod which she had gotten for Christmas. I mistakenly let iTunes sort out my music files, which I thought meant it would do it within iTunes on my computer and not physically on my network drive. Well my mistake. At the same time I received a spotify invitation and since then I haven’t accessed my destroyed music folder again. Instead I have used the service whenever I feel like listening to some tunes.
    Spotify’s artist radio feature has also allowed me to discover a lot more music than I would have had I confined myself to my music collection.
    The low cost of distributing music on the internet could actually be beneficial for the big 4 if they wanted to re-release large portions of their back-catalogue. I know of many jazz fanatics for example, who would love to be able to have access to some obscure releases which are impossible to find anywhere in a physical form. They could charge exorbitant prices for those kind of records if they wanted to.
    One last point about all of these people talking about musicians making a living from their music. Unless they are selling in the 100 of thousands I doubt that any musician is making that much money from record sales when you consider what their cut is for each record sale. Let’s see who makes what,(there might be small variations from country to country but the pattern is fairly similar everywhere) in many cases the government will take the larger cut through their sales tax, next is the record shop, then the record company who has to pay all those executives and radio pluggers, then the distributor who is often owned by the record company anyway, if there is a bit of money left this might be distributed to the artists and their manager but not until they have repaid their advance, marketing costs, studio rental etc…
    It’s not hard to imagine that even a three piece band is hardly going to roll around in money by selling a few thousand records from which they receive something between 1 to 5% of the sales price.
    Many bands are better off selling their albums online for small amounts of money that go directly into their bank accounts. See http://cashmusic.org/ for a good example of how it can be done.
    For those with spotify this is what I discovered this morning spotify:album:2oWLa0dhVZwrKiTMYI7KGk

  • Jeff

    The music industry’s problems are largely a self-inflicted wound. When they shut down the original Napster back in 2001 (I think this was the year), thry had a chance to compete and offer their music for download as single tracks if people wanted them that way.

    But no, they had to go on and force DRM onto people, and start a misguided and suicidal campaign of suing their customer base. Now a lot more people than before will never buy any music from any of the Big Four ever again.

    Of course their are other factors such as the economy, other forms of entertainment (other than music), the rise of internet radio, and so on. But for the most part, the music industry have no one to blame for killing sales than themselves.

  • immun

    “A certain amount of ‘market correction’ was inevitable, but piracy is still a big factor.”

    Right, so the most pirated movie of last year (The Dark Knight) was also the most successful in the box office. Certainly piracy is a big factor?

  • BritSwedeGuy

    “Home taping is killing music”
    Or maybe it’s the mass-produced American Idol, Jonas Brothers and “RnB” their machines churn out combined with their wilful determination to stick with their outmoded business model.
    Most musicians I know are quite happy printing up their own 7″ vinyl and CDs and playing live – it’s the music they care about.

  • skreeth

    George W Bush is to blame!!! His war on terror has significantly raised the cost of living world wide. Massive surges in oil, gasoline etc prices have driven up the cost of everything else particularly food. Additionally, this caused the massive overinflation to the cost of housing.

    The prosecution in this case are completely misguided in their blame. The defense lawyers should be pressurize the prosecution into questioning why their research/statistics do not take these factors into account.

    When food and shelter, and other basic survival essentials, cost significantly more than in 2003, they should understand luxuries like music and video would be the first of several items axed from personal budgets as citizens world wide tighten their financial belts in these economically turbulent times.

  • BritSwedeGuy

    And, following the defence’s “logic”:
    Last year my tree bore 50 fruit.
    This year it bore 40 fruit.
    Therefore you must have stolen 10 of my fruit.
    Urrr….

  • Har har har matie!

    Leave it to the RIAA to shoot them selves in the foot whenever it comes to a new technology / model.
    First they sued the Radio stations for broadcasting music, before they realized they can make money off of them, then it was the tapes, and the vcr’s, and so on.
    RIAA is the dumbest life form on the planet. Instead of realizing the potential of a new medium has to offer so they can make money, they sue the hell out of it, until they finally come defeated or another medium has surfaced, so they shift their attention to that one. Well if they wasted all that energy in to proving that piracy will make them go bancrupt into a model that will make them money, he’d all be listening to free music, and they’d be rolling in cash right now.
    When this whole TPB thing and many other court cases has blown over, the RIAA will be left broke, and the only ones to actually profit from it will be bands that used their brains and tried to make a business model out of the whole thing like Coldplay or NIN.
    So yes RIAA, keep suing everyone until you go down, since in the end, you will not be the one having the last laugh.

  • pink panther

    No one will ever read this comment, buried at the end, but don’t forget the once-only sales burst as people replaced LP, cassette, and 8-track with CD. This will NEVER happen again, and artificially inflated sales during the 90s. For a decade, the music industry got an artificial boost as they sold people music they already had (usually twice, the original CD + a remastered CD). Now that people are buying music on CD from the beginning, we’re seeing the true sales numbers.

  • christian

    i really hope they can point something as clear as this out in court!

    great post.

  • http://www.yourtopjob.com

    I agree completely.

    Great aritcle, go TBP !!!

  • Rodrigo

    I’m lazy. Why should I drive to the next store, search for a CD which might not be sold in this store and then buy a piece of plastic which takes space at my home, can get lost/damaged?
    This old way of distributing media is bad for the environment, it takes too much time, it’s unhandy and I have to waste money on all this.
    And if I don’t like what I bought, I can’t get my money back!

    Downloading media via the internet is so much easier and better. I’d be willing to pay when I like something. But,

    WHERE IS THE BUTTON to pay the artist?

  • twzz

    well stated
    but the moral issue here is one of royalties not being built into the web free content market.

    The music industry may well decline and fall and rise but once again it is the artists who are denied any income from their work.

    The free content / p2p networks will have to face this issue one day.

  • Oldman

    oh boy, this is awesome and well reasoned article , perfectly summarazing uproar and demand of the millions.

    thumbs up!

  • brs

    Don’t forget the successes already seen from bands that have released free digital downloads on the net, such as Trent Reznor/NIN Ghosts I–IV and The Slip.

  • Thor

    Great article. Good Job Jens.

    It seems apparent to me that their needs to be a paradigm shift in the way the major labels do business and that they should embrace the internet.
    It would be a tremendous asset for them if they choose to use it.

    The ifpi/mpii is busy trying to cripple it. I think they are beginning to see that.

    see:
    http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117978756.html?categoryId=16&cs=1

  • jan

    lets not forget that kids nowadays more likely have a computer in their room than a tv. radio is dead since a long time with the kids.
    tv used to be the only effective promotion channel for the industry.
    as you can see with mtv, kids don’t care about tv anymore.
    that’s a main reason imho.

  • newromanzer

    Full CDs can be worth to buy, if the artist is making it right. Tell a Story, so that it is a extra benefit to listen to the CD from the beginning to the end. Combine it with fine “must have” artwork in cover + Booklet + optics, and i will surely buy a full CD, maybe even if it is overpriced.

  • newromanzer

    forgot to say: Really great article! Many people should read this – not only here on torrentfreak, where nearly all readers know this. This has to be spread all over the net. The people are not all stupid (i hope), so every “common sensed” people should understand and agree.

  • Sharing is fun!

    Great article! One of the best things I’ve ever read on this site. Thanks!

  • mookiejapan

    People now spend money on things that weren’t mainstream eight years ago instead of music, like cell phones, ring tones, laptops, video games, DVD’s, flat screens.

    Even without spending money, the time and attention we give to YouTube clips takes away from the attention music might have gotten ten years ago.

    Songwriting quality has dropped in the same period, but the real issue is that there’s just a lot of other things to do now, and a lot more competition for the entertainment dollar.

  • jan

    youtube killed the music industry. i can’t imagine a single song not on youtube. okay, the quality is crap, but i’m on the computer almost all the time, so i can live with it.

  • edison carter

    Now, years ago when Britney released her first album, why didn’t I buy it, altouh I liked her music? Simple: I happened to listen to the album at a friends place who had bought it, and I discovered I -don’t like- the album. I had very much enjoyed the 4 or so songs that got played from it in the radio/TV, and I somewhat liked one more song that didn’t get a single release. The rest of the album was, for me, pure crap. I kept my money not because of piracy (I think that if the friend had recorded a copy of his tape for me than it wouldn’t even been illegal in my country) but because the album was not worth the price. Is this a single occourence? Definitly not. Why on Earth should I buy popular music by the album if even in the best case here’ll be atleast 2 songs I don’t have much interest in?

  • Bart

    i think filesharing is killing the music industry. so what. why even try to prove it’s not?

  • Astra

    Video killed the radio store.

  • sobe

    Don’t forget the crappy cd cases.

  • dahlia jasenovic

    Changing the name of the Pirate Bay to the “Liberators of Music” would help the cause. Access to new and fresh music has never been so easy.
    They can take there corporate rock machine and shove it.

  • Bubbles

    I really hope that this article can be read by the Judges involved in the pirate bay case.

    Can someone make that happen?

  • Roo-ster

    I posit that the most over looked factor in declining music sales over the past 10+ years is the corresponding increase in media concentration in commercial broadcasting the U.S.

    The fact is that the combined playlists of the ten radio stations I receive contain only 75 – 100 different songs. This may be due to the stations being owned by one or two corporate programmers.

    When I listened to radio in the 1980s I had a wealth of diverse programming alternatives that exposed me to music that I ultimately bought. Today, radio stations saturate the airwaves with a smaller selection — generally a handful of already over hyped and under talented performers

  • Bubbles

    Also I’d just like to say that I am a person that has *NEVER* pirated music myself. Yet I still support the pirate bay.
    The difference with me is that I have never been into mainstream music; all the music I listen to is either game music soundtracks or obscure stuff bought *legally* from places like eMusic, PayPlay, and Amazon MP3s.
    and these niche musics cannot afford to ignore new tech, so are at the forefront of making it easy for me to purchase their music.
    The only time I have been tempted to pirate music was when I wanted to buy something more mainstream, and could not find it online legally anywhere, and have no use for CDs (who wants to have to use a CD drive in this day and age!?). Luckily Amazon MP3 have just came along to offer more mainstream music.
    [/end life story] ;)

  • Surma

    One should also mention the expansion of the used cd market. With corporate chains such as FYE even taking part, the recording industry doesn’t see a dime of the profit these stores make selling used CDs.

  • Neurotoxine

    I remember some tips from publicity and marketing telling something about the way the enterprises should handle the market by developing necessities in products that are not as much needed. So when they develop those new characteristics that made the product a necessary item, they can handle the market of this product and control the way the product evolves.

    Well an example of this could be Coca-cola. No one ever has needed a sugar-carbonated drink to live or even to calm the thirst. They even related coke with happiness so now Coca-cola evolved from a soft drink to a magical happiness potion.

    The music market didn’t know what were they selling.
    Were they selling musical CD’s?
    Were they selling musical CD’s + art?
    Were they selling art?
    Were they selling sadness?
    Were they selling rebellion?
    They never realized that. They didn’t know what they were selling and now they can’t explain why their business is dying, cause they don’t know what IS people doing with music and for what are they hearing it in the first place.

    Thus, they can’t identify precisely what’s causing the demise of the industry (yet reading those numbers don’t make me think the industry of the big crappy 4 is dead), so they’re attacking everything’s related to music which is not handled by them.

    They simply sit down to sell CD’s of crappy CEO’s likeness groups but they never used marketing real tools and forgot to ask the people what they wanted or what they felt about the relation product value v/s perceived value-satisfaction feelings.

    Now, it’s too late. When musicians are becoming artists again, freeing what they do, to get their artistic message to more people and to a more targeted people, there’s no way an intermediate actor could do anything to enhance the channel of distribution and the value perception when the product cost is nearly $0 and the perceived value always gets paid full every time the song is replayed.

    Resume: They’re done. Nothing to do.

  • Bloink

    Let’s not forget all the people, like myself, who wants to see the big music companies fail because of their disgraceful behaviour. Why support an industry that is actively lobbying against my interests. I would never buy a CD precisely for that reason. I can live without owning a particular piece of music if part of the price is my liberty. I will not support an artist who participates in jailing their biggest fans.

    On a side note: If the industry succeeds in crippling the torrent sites, new trackerless protocols with a greater degree of anonymity will emerge and then there will be no one to sue. The technology already exist it’s just not that popular yet, because torrents are easier and faster.

  • Kikou

    Excellent article. Could use some factual data and charts to push its point, but excellent nonetheless.

  • Anonymous

    I don’t want to buy a CD recording of an untalented person shaking there tits and screaming. I can’t see the tit shaking and can only here the shit music and screaming.

    I make my money count and I get better value from other entertainment options. Music is a low priority item.

  • Dario

    wanna know whats killing the music industry? nothing because with all the software effects like auto tune they use, It costs them nothing to make an album. If there is any loss in revenue its the terrible music they produce!

  • Anonymous

    If you want to kill the music industry, bomb it!

  • Wes

    Excellent article and I could not agree more with your stance in the fact that technology has drastically advanced and the recording industry has not embraced any of the new advances but rather choose to remain stagnant in their 20th century business model.

  • dude123

    I don’t think you can underestimate the effect of DRM and the legal campaign.

    DRM is a thorn in the side of most consumers. I’ve got numerous CDs that won’t work in certain CD players. Is it b/c of DRM? Maybe, maybe not… but hell if I’ll keep buying them if they don’t work.

    They also have alienated huge portions of college aged people with their legal campaigns. That demographic is traditionally one of the largest consumers of music, and they went and pissed of huge numbers of them.

    I’m also fully in agreement with number 8. The industry has always used the single to sell records/CDs (and still does). However, with digital downloads like iTunes, you don’t need to spend $15 or more to get it. It’s now about $1. That’ll put huge cuts into revenue.

  • Anonymous

    I’ve long felt the re-buy tactic is the thing that was key to their unsustainable model. The labels loved vinyl, 8-track, the cassette and CD just because people had to continually re-buy the same music to keep up with the times. Consumers have basically said the buck stops here with digital content. I have mp3s that are over 10 years old now and have migrated through 4 computers.

  • Pingback: Lesezeichen vom 27-02-2009 | PolkaRobot

  • maja

    magnificent article!!

  • akademos

    When u try to cripple consumer choice its impossible to have a successful business model.There are certain things that u need to change with the changing times.
    A small example.When Amazon launched mp3 service with DRM free songs after convincing the big 4,I like many others welcomed that decision and i remember spending around 70/USD the very first month as I found the service to be very reliable and user friendly.
    But within a month of its launch the Big4 started their bully and decided to pull out if Amazon does not stop selling outside of USA.
    So what appeared when i tried again was a ‘geographical restriction message’.
    Since i travel a lot it was practically impossible for me to carry cd’s around and what was like a dream choice for me was taken away from me and millions of Non US residents around the world by an archaic business model.
    So what was i left with.It was website like TPB that came to my rescue as users around the world were ready to share that niche or hard to find cd in a major store with great quality rips.
    Even though i was ready to spend, i was not given an opportunity to spend here.
    And I returned the favor by seeding them so that others can listen to those songs.RIAA may not ever understand as to why i seeded the songs coz i did not earn anything out of that ! or why did someone in the first place shared those songs with me coz he also did benefit monetarily…but the fact here is that if u in this age cripple consumer choice and expect them to accept whatever they decide as right or wrong then u r bound to lose more customers and more business for sure.
    And what I did

  • Ben Hurr

    Wow

    I don’t even care if you can get the latest rip of whatever anymore, be it games, music, movies, etc

    At this point I’d just want these media moguls to fail because they believe they can boss around the entire world. ACTA and ISP shenanigans anyone?

  • akademos

    @140
    RIAA may not ever understand as to why i seeded the songs coz i did not earn anything out of that ! or why did someone in the first place shared those songs with me coz he also did ‘ NOT ‘ benefit monetarily…
    … is what I meant…sorry for the typo !

  • rack88

    Very, very true. I was waiting and waiting for the last point, which is definitely the main one.

  • Anonymous

    #9 What is reported is net value of CDs, the cost of the recording equipment also reduces the cost to the industry, which reduces the cost of the CD, which reduces the overall net value

    #10 Walmart demanded lower priced CD and entually got their way, this drove music only stored out of business (as reported here iirc). Lower prices again = lower net values.

    I think it has also been mentioned CDs are no longer being shipped in as bulk of quantities (more smaller shippments) to reduce stock piles. Also lowers the net cost as they may not over sell as much product.

  • ITguy

    Eh until people start releasing everything in FLAC I don’t want to download stuff.

    If I buy a digital copy I want the original waveform not a compressed lossy format. I’ll continue buying CDs because the artists I support are 9/10 times not on major labels.

  • Playboyman

    The RIAA is NOT updating the way it sells music to the masses.

    They STILL use CD’s because they think CD’s are still popular, and don’t understand that Digital Downloads (Legit) are an opportunity to increase their bottom line.

    They truly deserve to be called dinosaurs

  • Andrew Osenga

    I’m a professional musician/songwriter. I have never put “filler” on any record I’ve worked on. If a song’s not good enough, you keep working until it is, or you don’t put it on there. I don’t understand how you can justify piracy. I have two kids, they eat, they need a roof over their heads, as do my wife and I. I work my tail off every day in the studio or on the road. My guitars cost money, my studio costs money, good mics, preamps, cables, strings, etc.. cost money. I need to be able to sell the things I make. You steal them, we don’t eat. Frankly, I don’t see how you can argue with this. If you think you can, please come to Nashville and do my job for a week and try to make a living.

  • Anonymous

    Excellent post.

    After 1999 is when things started trailing off. If I recall the PS2 also came out right around then 1999/2000 and it just so happens that the PS2 is the best selling console evar…

  • Bubbles

    #147, maybe it’s time you got a new job eh? That’ll teach these nasty pirates, they won’t have any music left to listen too. What a tragedy that would be!

    Ok, sorry to be mean, but piracy is well and truly justified by a lot of comments on this thread. You need to read them. It seems the majority of people simply file share because buying CDs and DRM are so irritating.

    People are against the big corporate monoliths, not the musicians. You musicians are indeed victims, but so are consumers. The problem is the big industries are digging their feet in and being unwilling to use new technologies and become part of a global market. (if MP3s of your music can be purchased in one country but not all the rest, what do you think those others are going to do! Settle for the inferior product?)

  • Bubbles

    Here’s an alternative view point (not one I necessarily support, but just find interesting):

    Music can now be copied for free, so we should now consider the producing of music and expecting to get paid for it to be obsolete. Just accept it. Other industries have to. Do you think blacksmiths were happy when factory built machines took over? The music industry as we knew it is dying.

    Now will music die out and become a lost art? Somehow I don’t think so. Maybe there will be less musicians. Sh1t happens, the world is cruel, people lose their jobs. But what is more likely is that live performances will take over, or other ways to fund music will develop.

  • Pingback: Reading the news so you don’t have to » LeAnneRudy.com

  • kief

    the music indrustry will die not because of file sharing but the music quality or lack of it.

  • RIAAtarded

    wow bang on the money with this article..kudos to the writer. To bad anyone in power will ignore it because it doesn’t fit their draconian business ideals.

  • SRL

    The middle men running it. That is what is killing the music industry. A new construction of how to reach people as well as format type need to be considered.

  • Adrienne

    Could is possibly be *gasp* that the music industry is having a difficult time because the music (at least for the big four) is getting worse and worse with every year? Popular music, or that which the industry shoves down our throats is horrible. Maybe, just maybe the music industry should shift it’s paradigm about everything.

  • Warlok

    Hmmm, a couple nice points regarding the advances in technology, etc. But we all have to stop defending torrents as anything but a place to exchange stolen goods. Without all the illegally available music, movies, & software, torrents would not even exist. It’s a place to get free stuff that we should otherwise be paying for and that is wrong. There are other factors at play to be sure, but illegal file sharing is a huge problem for these industries.

  • xeno

    I think this is part of the reason for decline, but I would also like to point out at a personal level, that there has been a general decline in the quality of product they are putting out. In TPB’s trial one of the CEO’s pointed out that 2000 was a record year; well duh.

    In 2000 the best selling album was The Marshall Mathers LP, which to this day is praised as one of the best rap albums ever made, and has sold almost 20m Copies, going Diamond in the USA. Look at some of the other releases from 2000; Kid A, Maybe I’ll Catch Fire, The Moon & Antarctica, and Reflection Eternal. All of those are amazing albums that I have or would definitely have bought when they came out.

    As a huge fan of music, I was so disappointed when it came to buying albums because I got tired of buying an album for 1-3 songs, and finding out the remainder of the content was HORRIBLE. So now I do it the smart way, I download the album ahead of time, and if I like it, I buy the whole thing. No longer will I be robbed by the music industry.

  • pedxing

    You missed the real reason that revenues have dropped. The Music companies refuse to recognize that their market has changed and adjust their business plans accordingly.

    Music companies charge about US$0.99 per song. There are typically around 12 songs per CD. They charge about $12 per CD. That means the cost of downloaded music is about the same as the cost of buying a CD.

    Now, people naturally react negatively to this because they know that shipping a CD costs more than downloading a file. But there is a more fundamental problem. People’s consumption of music has changed dramatically.

    When we all collected CDs, a typical person might own 100 to 200 CDs. Let’s assume the higher number, 200. That means the person had about 2400 songs in their collection.

    How many people have only that many songs now? An 80G IPod can hold over 30,000 songs. This is more than an order of magnitude increase. Does the music inductry think people who spent $2000 on music are now going to spend $25,000? Dream on!

    If they charged US$0.09 per download, they could virtually eliminate music piracy in an instant. And, they would earn more money than ever before. No one would think twice about downloading and paying for a song.

    So who is to blame for the sales slump? The industry. They are forcing people to pirate to meet the new consumption demand. People simply can’t afford to be honest.

  • Warlok

    And to all those blaming the “quality of the music” as the reason for the music industry having problems. That is too funny. So basically what you are saying is that if the music was good you wouldn’t steal it? Which would mean you pay for all of your good music? Yeah. Uh-uh.

    Hahahaa. It’s funny watching many of you give reasons why you are “forced” to steal music. it’s not your fault. “If the record companies didn’t suck so bad you wouldn’t have to steal from them.”
    Do you hear yourselves? wow.

  • Pingback: Hoe de muziek-industrie zichzelf in de vingers sneed « Leven is het meervoud van LEF

  • Coco Lopez

    When the RIAA started going after people, I stopped buying music in any form. Why support an industry that hates you?

  • Pingback: nicorola musikblog - rock-a-hula baby » Links vom 27.02.2009

  • heeerrresjonny

    This should be forwarded to the court if it hasn’t been already :-P

  • Brilliant Death

    Absolutely on the money. This needs to be introduced to the judge and jury.

  • TheGuest

    Beautiful article, just beautiful. Almost made me feel sorry for the RIAA, yet they deserve the worst after going after their own consumer. Your business model can’t be targeted to the same individuals you you seek to prosecute.

  • Ghostfac3killa3

    This is by far the best article i have read on this site in quite a while, kudos to Jens Roland for a great article!

  • devino

    Great article! Even so great that I wanted to let more people know about it, so I translated it into dutch on my own blog, I hope you don’t mind, otherwise tell me so.

    The dutch translation can be found here: http://log.devino-online.nl/?p=83

  • Apes-R-Us

    Wow…
    He said it all…..
    He said it well…
    He said the truth…
    He relates to my life experience….

    Nice to hear the truth without any apparent slant from anywhere…

  • Anonymous

    @147

    Make money from performing live shows and distribute your songs for free in digital format.

    Sign with an IFPI label and you will be boycotted.

  • torrentwatcher

    laws are meant to be broken nuff said..

    the music industy uses the word piracy because most young people dont understand the legal definition of th word.
    piracy is the taking, by force, of a vessel in the hight seas, adn seixing the contents thererfrom.

    So, for piracy to be proven it must be shown that
    1) a representative ( of the music industry in this instance)is transporting a consignment from point a to b.

    2 that the representative was intercepted against their will at a point between departure and arrival.,
    3 that the consignment had in fact been forcibly removed gtom the representative when contact was established.
    unfortunately as we all know, fair play does not count for anything when you have bags of money to fall back on.as the saying ap[tly states “money talks”.
    the article”how to kill the music industry” plainly shows the real motive behind the piracy trials. throw enough money at the court and they will eventually bend the law sufficiently to gain a goodly slice of the money.NO COURT HOWEVER WELL POLICED ,IS IMMUNE FROM CORRUPTION

  • Staggs

    The IPOD/mp3 is to blame here. They started to come out in the drones around 2000, oh the same year the Music Industry failed to see that CDs were replaced by CD-less MP3-players and failed to convert.

    Maybe pirating wouldn’t be so big if they had any actual creativity to slow down CD production and create a more contemporary distribution method for music.

    Their loss, leave us alone.

  • Led Zeppelin

    I see the future business model and it will be this:

    Known Major Bands will no longer sign deals with the Major Labels – they will simply pay and produce their own material and sell it directly via DL.

    The first major act that does this and documents the success will cause the critical mass effect necessary.

    It’s the same model used to fight the crooks at ticketmaster (although there still haven’t been nearly enough bands that have moved to alternative distribution for tickets)

    The Labels will still exist to find the new talent, up and comers, etc and will get their pound of flesh as that band gains exposure to the masses.

  • a

    you missed a big factor – record company sales soared in the 80`s and 90`s as they converted their back catalogues to CD. This huge cash cow started declining at the beginning of the century as consumers had by that time rebought all their old favourites on CD.
    As well during this period labels drastically cut back releasing new artists because they were making so much on thei existing catalogue.

  • txGreg

    (disclaimer: I didn’t read ALL of the comments, so I might be being redundant here).

    Important note: when the record company execs claim “losses,” they assume that one download equals one lost sale. This is not true. While it is going to be true from time to time, it is also true that someone might take something offered for free that they wouldn’t buy for a dollar (let alone 20).

    Also, speaking for myself, “illegal” downloading has provided more sales for the industry than it has cost. While I have downloaded some stinkers (looking at you Axl) that I then promptly deleted and then did not purchase, I have downloaded many more that I have then hunted down and bought because they were good. I understand that this scenario is not true of all downloaders, but I know of several whom it does represent.

    Finally, the worst problem that the music business has can be found in the mirror. The term itself implies a balance: “Music Business.” If you only care about the music, you’re liable to starve for food. If you only care about the business, you will probably starve for creativity. For a loooooong time now, the music has taken a distant backseat to the business (in fact, it’s in the trunk; tied up; wearing cement shoes).

    ’nuff said

  • Nielsen

    Many older people that I know stopped buying CDs some years back, after they found out that the record companies was using the profits to hire lawyers to persecute college students who downloaded music.

    I think this type of boycott is a perhaps invisible, but not insignificant factor in the declining record sales. The recording industry, by behaving badly towards the general public, has brought this upon themselves.

  • Anonymous

    @Warlok
    “So basically what you are saying is that if the music was good you wouldn’t steal it?”

    Oh no.

    A liar has called me a thief. Now I’ll stop filesharing forever and go hide my head in shame. :(

  • dope

    This is why peeps dont go to the cinema anymore.
    http://www.blu-ray.com/community/gallery.php?member=Brain%20Sturgeon&folderid=282
    I want one….lol

  • Foster Foskin

    One VERY IMPORTANT factor you forgot: When the record companies stopped producing good music like we had in the 60′s, 70′s, and 80′s, many of us just stopped buying. Rap Crap is not music. There is no tune, the rappers don’t sing. The beat is repetitive and boring, and the lyrics are crap. Yet the record companies continue to produce this rubbish!

    Why should I buy a record or an album? I go into record stores these days and rarely walk out with anything because I can’t find the music I like. Much of the music I like is now so old it is already out of copyright, so I can download it without any worries.

    Until the record companies wake up to the modern world and start giving us BUYERS the options and the music WE want, they will continue to lose sales.

  • Anon

    let teh RIAA walk ye plank!!!

    YARRRRRR!!!!!!!

  • FreeRyde

    The music industries decline began in the late 70′s with the demise of the ‘Single’. The industry wanted their $15.+ for an album. Napster filed the gap, allowing us to select a song or two opposed to a disc with filler. The industry failed to catch on, until iTunes made their presentation. Jackson’s ‘Thriller’ helped revitalize things (initially in vinyl, then CD), as CD’s were also a problem for them. But then so were cassettes before that. Major revenues are realized though concerts and paraphernalia. Promo material is frequently released early to promote a CD release and forthcoming concert. tour. The music industry fails to adapt in most every circumstance that arises.

  • Darren

    We just need to prove there is a direct correlation between the use of overpriced, major label CDs, and cancer.

  • pawnt

    yea, boo hoo for the music industry! Maybe people are tired of paying WAY too much for what they get? Just so old rockers like Ozzy Osborn can stumble around his L.A. mansion with a drug-fried brain, gold jewellery hanging from every appendage. Crying for his keepers. Or maybe we wouldn’t have every retard in America trying out for American Idol, whining and crying about their delusional narcissistic “dream” of being popular and loved by people they don’t even know. Yea my heart goes out to the music industry, I hope they collapse so I don’t have to watch on CNN the wired-out scanks like Brittany Spears, Courtney Love and Amy Winehouse explode. Everyone waiting desperately for the news that they died choking on their puke.

  • Pingback: mymediamusings » Great Rebuttal of Idea that Pirates Killing Music Industry

  • -_-

    It’s not Napster’s fault, it’s not music industry’s fault etc…

    Development of internet has allowed us for first time in history that we can finally diversify our hobies, so we can spend our free time on whatever we are interested in.

    Before internet our choices were very limited. We could hang out on the street, listen music, watch TV, play football.

    Now we can in matter of seconds find people (thanks to internet) for whatever hobby we have. There is no need anymore to spend money on things we were actually forced to spend time on.

  • Anonymous

    If you listen to good music there are no filler songs

  • wintermute

    kudos to the original author, this is an amazing piece of deconstructing, informing and liberating writing. Some parts of these arguments can be applied to many other areas, where the old business models becoming increasingly irrelavent.

    moreover, IMO, the decline that we see in the music industry will continue to worsen as our current economy suffers in a recession. currently, a large portion of their profit is generated based on concerts and memorabilia (sp) sales, which will certainly see a dramatic decline because people simply do not have the money to spend (and possibly do NOT want to spend). somehow, I can imagine to see the music and film industry pin that one on piracy and file-sharing as well. How can we support an industry that refuses to service their customers because they have to protect their own bottom-line and their shareholder’s profit margin?

    one other note to add to this, is that there still seem to be a lot of confusion in main-stream media (and a lot of people involved with litigations in this area) about the differences between piracy, a pirate life-style and file-sharing. Piracy is definitely a problem, not just in the infringement of intellectual right, but in other areas where the funds generated through piracy eventually end up. I don’t know about you guys, but I really cringe everytime someone mis-uses the terms.

  • Paul

    When are the music companies going to give in on stuff like this? There are too many
    people, myself included, who are fed up with the old school way of
    promoting shows and artists. Online radio has already changed the face
    of music. If you are interested in a career in online radio check out the Radio Connection. They match you with a mentor which specializes in your area of interest, whether is is electronica, Djing, hip hop, or talk radio. http://www.radioconnection.com for more info !

  • File Spree

    The facts.
    1. DRM infested files on audio downloads.
    2. Getting into the digital music scene late and all recording companies was broken up where you had to use 2-3 different websites to attain the artist since they all was split.
    3. High prices of cds and the prices climbed higher.
    4. Sued the fans and acted like assholes.
    5. Try to keep the CD format as a viable 15 dollar product.
    6. Bitch about their loss of money since they didnt fully invest the billions they made prior.

  • Pingback: Proper Parenting and Custody Advice for Parents | Where To Look For Useful Parenting Resources

  • Dave

    Well, during this time, my musical purchases have declined dramatically. Not because I download, but because I’ve been largely unimpressed with what’s been offered me.

    The industry is overly focused on formulas, and is totally unwilling to innovate. If (insert current fad here) is king, then they’ll only publish (insert current fad here).

    I don’t need to buy music to hear more of the same. Their declining revenues are entirely their own doing.

  • skiz

    Some very good arguments have been presented here, but I’m pretty sure the 9th item in this list should be piracy.

    I know of someone who has downloaded about half a dozen albums with the intention of giving them a listen and then buying them if they liked them. They continue to enjoy these albums for years but have not yet bought them.

    Also, I know of someone who has downloaded dozens of movies and TV series with no intention of buying or renting them. Before downloading movies became feasible, they used to go to the movie theater more often or rent the DVDs. In the past, because of the expense, they would would see fewer shows, but there was still some profit for the movie industry. Now that it costs them nothing, they certainly watch a lot more, but there is no profit at all for the movie industry.

    If they have done this, I’m pretty sure that millions of other people have done this also.

    Don’t pretend that piracy has not contributed to the declining profits of the music and movie industry.

  • Pingback: How To Get Everything About The Music Industry Wrong » The Cynical Musician

  • Pingback: The Daily Loper - February 27, 2009 | Medialoper

  • Ru

    Excellent article. Especially #8 – with the advent of new ways to obtain music, people aren’t forced to buy full albums from record companies.

  • plonk420

    well, with regards to #8, i’m not sure what’s happened over the years, but i liked a majority of tracks on albums like 15 years ago. very rarely does that happen for pop-radio people these days. a majority of the recent albums i’ve bought i’ve liked most of the tracks, tho.

  • my 2 cent car crash.

    I believe the music industry was forced to reduce cost of cd albums by court order some 4 years ago.
    The finding was that prices were inflated.

    2005 12.3
    2006 11.8
    2007 10.4

    If my dates are right this could show the downturn of 06,07.

    This fact is also conveniently left off any reports given in court on these subject matters

  • s.n.

    @147

    I don’t think you need to worry:
    http://www.torrentz.com/search?q=Andrew+Osenga

  • Chirag

    That’s is sound argument, the music industry has completely stopped innovating.

  • PirateNoxious

    All I can say is that before I discovered P2P and then Bit Torrent I used to spend a lot of money to acquire music. I have not spent one dime on music in the last 5 years. Anyone who says that piracy has not had a significant, negligible effect on the music industry is high.

  • Jens Roland

    #107: I read your comment, and you bring up a good point that I actually missed when I wrote the article. The sales burst in the 90s from people replacing their old analog media with CDs was a one-time occurrence, which further inflated music sales in that period. A keen observation.

  • Jens Roland

    #147, Andrew Osenga: I don’t try to justify piracy. That isn’t my point. Political discussions aside, copyright infringement *is* illegal, and I respect that. However, as an artist, your livelihood depends on a variety of media and promotional dynamics that can sometimes be counter-intuitive, like radio and file sharing. If you equate one (illegal) download with one lost sale, then you are not seeing the whole picture. Downloading hasn’t replaced purchasing. What it has actually replaced, is home recording of music off the radio. But that’s a point for another article.

  • You’ll find my name at the end

    Firstly, people can not and do not spend money they don’t have, therefore nothing is lost. If I had to pay (the ridiculous price) for everything I downloaded, I would not have seen any of it, and in reality, if you are a creator of something and now one sees it, then you might as well have created nothing. Your message, whatever the media will not be heard. Also I will have to assume you create to get your “message”/feelings/views out to others. Lastly on this part of the subject, I have no sympathy for people making millions and loosing out, boo hoo. Movies are expensive because some idiot thinks they are what makes the movie good, not everything/everyone effort just them. Actors making millions (Friends comes to mind) is just sickening.

    Artist will have to tour, yes I said tour, that’s the way you make your money, and all this mega millions they had over the last few decades, was money they really didn’t deserve. The only band that could get away with it was the Beatles, and if they were around today, they would be touring or out of a job, period!

    Also more importantly, Jens has hit on a hidden point made here (the article, well written by the way) is how Corporations will hold back humanity with their style/psychology of business. Imagine how many other industries have had advances that were taken and sealed away or destroyed. This article shows how not only the music industry is trying to hold back society, but how our society has come to where it is today. Consumerism & Capitalism are great recipes for Greed and TOTAL disrespect for everything from each other to our very planet.

    Grow up humanity, and speak up silent majority, before you don’t have the choice.
    I wrote this before and hope like the rest of this post is read and enjoyed, even being soo far down the list.

    Bully in a Sandbox

    Like a bully in a sand box filled with mirth
    The universe has many others than just little Earth
    No more than the insects who gather in groups
    Fighting with others for their little roots
    We may not have K9s’ to rip at our flesh
    Traded for words to rip the soul from our chest
    While some count pennies to prove they are better than others
    Most seem to miss the point which is we are all still brothers
    Time grows short, and land does too,
    Some say we act like animals in the Zoo
    This would be an insult to all animals fool
    For unlike humanity they are not cruel
    I do not know what bad things are on the horizon
    But I can see the cloud, to the heavens it is rising
    The sadness I feel for what we could have achieved
    Is only overshadowed with miseries not yet relieved

    I have no understanding why so few make our choice
    When we have so many and make the majority voice
    Our resources grow less, our population grows more
    The economic system is about to hit the floor
    Thirty years have gone by since we went to the moon
    We could have grown food or even made saloon
    Instead we made weapons to kill each other
    Fighting for lines on a map with our brother
    Enslaving other countries to meet our needs
    We ignore all others and their pleads
    We greedily all want cars and our fees
    Showing no respect for the plants and the trees
    Subways are better a wiser view and not as crude
    Instead of streets we could have gardens growing food
    Highways would change to mass transit in time
    Two lanes at a time this would be fine
    No more roads would be built it may take a while
    Some how I think I’m not the only one to smile
    Second and third rate products of any and all kind
    Never last as long and help put us in this bind
    Players and media for all entertainment needs
    Small hard drives make these not fit our needs
    Restaurants and people waste too much food
    Many could be fed with what isn’t chewed
    LED Christmas lights here is a great find
    Why are we still making that other kind
    Thousands of copies of the same books with the same pages
    Libraries could have few of them and share them for the ages

    There is a point I’m trying to make
    There’s more than enough for everyone’s sake
    Why make more than we need to make
    When half of the stuff is more or less fake
    Inventing technology has been our greatest strive
    We still work as long just to survive
    Only a few days that’s what we should work
    Some say I’m crazy, some say I’m a jerk
    Take all the people form all these areas’
    Ones from the war machine to stop some hysteria
    Gun makers and bullet makers and bio weaponist
    Auto makers and related industries could all be put to rest
    Manufactures no longer needed because we only make the best
    Trees staying planted giving Mother Nature her rest
    Less people delivering and still fewer selling
    Is anyone catching what this cook is smelling
    Restaurants only make what will be used in a day
    Let’s not cut down the Amazon so a cow can eat hay
    No more Telemarketers ringing your phone
    Those internet spammers not invading your home
    A stop to the pop-ups on the internet
    Lets at least try get the last three lines met

    Many more examples I could recite
    But this is not the point to this blight
    With all these people now out of work
    I bet a lot more of you think I’m a jerk
    All of these people could help lessen the load
    We’ll have more free time for the spiritual road
    Even though this would cost and use less
    And maybe even sort some of this mess
    Clear our skies and help with pollution
    Some will still argue this is not a solution
    There is nothing unrealistic that has been planned
    Except it will take all of us to make the stand

    We have technology and I see how much we could do
    But when I look at the pyramids with what they did do
    Even with slavery or devotion to some greater plan
    Why are we not making something more grand

    Count what you want gather what you can, like insects surrounded by the sand
    A higher line of thinking should be for man, taking each step with others by hand
    Care for the future of our great clan, together we can make a much better stand
    Like the blind we’ll have nowhere to flee, I beg you please listen and heed
    My energy leaves eyes wish not see, I hope I’ve planted even one little seed
    Only enlightenment will help you be free, our potential is great not only a need

    On a ball of dirt no bigger than an electron,
    The Universe holds many more to step on.

    Great good things will take a lot more of our time
    Great bad things happen in the space of this rhyme.

    In closing I leave you with one final thought
    As I sip my tea because it’s too damn hot
    I should have made this drink in a pot not a cup
    Change is needed if we’re going to grow up

    DaveMRJPotter
    These can be shared freely; I have made these not for money but in hope. I ask only that they are not altered. I give them with Love
    Copy write: DaveMRJPotter

    P.S this was written at the end of 2004

  • You’ll find my name at the end

    can be contacted @

    tomye-mail@cogeco.ca

  • Pingback: How To Kill The Music Industry | NJN Network

  • Pingback: » Prozess gegen The Pirate Bay: Blumen und Spott | 78s - Das Magazin für bessere Musik

  • Graeme

    Everything on the internet can be duplicated.

    That cannot be reversed.

    Digital music is here to stay, the music companies need to look at a new profit model for the new economy – just like every other business out there.

    I’d be quite interested in seeing the revenue of bought music v revenue from “live performances”.

    I suspect that more people are going to gigs and festivals than ever before – but I bet the music industry dont particularly want to volunteer these figures.

    http://graemeharrison.typepad.com

  • Pingback: Violet music design. - Free Wordpress Theme downloads.

  • Gert ten Brink

    The whole discussion is getting interesting. My two cents.
    Two links to follow:
    http://www.xs4all.nl/opinie/2007/01/10/oorlog-in-de-onderwereld/

    In short English, the artist in question sees his CD’s as promotion material and never saw anything coming from the records company (<10%)

    The Russion did it wright this time :-) link: http://www.sonofallofmp3.com/indexs2
    The RIAA was not happy with this idea……

  • jambarama

    I have no statistics here, this is just what I’d look at if I was a music exec.

    * increased competition for fixed entertainment dollars from nearly all fronts, movie theaters are also doing bad for similar reasons *[#1, though shouldn't be limited to consoles]*

    * The internet has undermined their ability to price discriminate *[#2, it may explain falling profits, won't explain falling sales]*

    * new music is competing with the existing media everyone already owns, and it is easier to have previously purchased media handy now *[#3 points to CDs lasting long, while true, ripped mp3s last longer - as long as you can run backups, and you can have all of it in one small portable device]*

    * independent media/artists are distributing outside the industry and eating the long tail, part of which used to go to the big labels [#4 & #5 - some mainstream artists are opting out of the music industry's model too - NIN, Radiohead, Prince, etc]*

    * since music is now sold track by track online, people aren’t buying the filler anymore they used to be stuck with on CDs *[#8, this is huge]*

    * the internet has provided a fantastic array of free substitutes

    * their lawsuit campaigns have earned them a small army of enemies & boycotters

    * the average real wage hasn’t risen since the 70s, we’re up to our eyeballs in debt and in a depression, and music is a luxury item

    * everyone is done repurchasing the same content in CD form (e.g. the format shifting sales have disappeared)

    * many people, even the non-tech savvy, have avoided drm’d music because of what the techies have said about music vanishing if the servers shut down, and because they’re not used to buying music online yet

    I’d like to say most new, popular music is crap but I think that has always been the case. I really just think they have a lot more competition now from podcasts, audiobooks, youtube videos, and their back catalog. I know that’s why I buy less.

    I’m sure piracy matters, and I’ll wager it somewhat decreases industry revenue (e.g. they might have seen growth in the last few years if piracy was impossible) but to lay the entire decline at the feet of piracy is just plain stupid. Now I’m going to go listen to This American Life rather than music.

  • Forseti

    How come this model would not work?
    see
    soundike com

    I suspect the ifpi does not like this site. I would gladly pay their prices. If they can do it, why cant EMI? I suspect that the price I would gladly pay here for the download
    would not include the ifpi american dinosaur tax, but I would get music that would actually play everywhere I wanted

    I say good.

  • Piguglyness

    How come this model would not work?
    see
    soundike com

    This is another russian site like allofmp3.com. With the new U2 album costing $1.92 how much of that go’s to the artist…lol
    They will close this one next.

  • Matt

    3rd world model on export!

    In for example Brazil you can get a pirate cd for about 1$ in any street corner, the music artists live from playing live and they sell their own original cds for about 5$ at the show.
    They still make good money and more peaploe get to enjoy their music the best way LIVE.
    Who the fk needs the music industry, they produce mostly braindead pop that needs billions of $ in comercial to get anyone interested, billions that also consumers of the few good produktions have to pay.

  • Piglet

    I would be interested to see the figures for shipped music for 2008 and 2009. Purhaps those were not released by the music industry yet because it show a CLEAR relationship that the annual trends in shipped music values and the world economy are directly related.

  • Dan

    You forgot to mention that the music for the last 15 years simply sucks. Why do you think we’re still listening to music from the 50′s – 80′s? Has there ever been a time in our history when 50 year old music was still immensely popular? Nope. And the reason is that music industry types exploit the Britney Spears of the world instead of quality artists.

  • Anonymous

    @201
    The point is that if EMI did it and charged 3.00 and a million people downloaded it, would they not make money both for U2 and themselves.

  • Jay

    When I was younger, bought a pile of CD’s and ripped them to the hard drive, the ripped mp3′s are what I play with copies of the originals for use in the car, have had a car broken into in the past and all they got were the copies.
    I still play the music most weeks, listening at home it is stream radio, or playing games. On the change from casettes to cd, did buy a lot, but not had the desire to spend loads more on another format.
    DRM on cd’s sucks, friend tried to rip a single cd for his sister but could not, so went onto google and searched for a torrent of the single and got the whole collection DRM free. If he had been able to rip the one album, then the sister would have continued buying Cd’s

  • forgot one thing

    This article missed the biggest reason why the RIAA isn’t seeing dollars, imo. The internet has destroyed the RIAA’s iron grip on the consumer’s choice. With net zines, myspace, last.fm, blogs, ect, music lovers aren’t restricted to hearing about their music via radio, MTV, corporate magazines or word of mouth. Indie bands and indie labels used to take a beating at the hands of the RIAA since they had no way for their material to get heard. Now the internet has changed all of that. Indie bands and labels are thriving. I haven’t spent a single penny on an RIAA produced album since 1997. I have, however, spent quite a bit of money on music.

    So it’s misleading for the RIAA to say that music isn’t selling as much as it used to. Music is selling just fine only now consumers have a choice between a wide variety of music instead of the crap the RIAA keeps churning out.

  • Spork

    I have a idea. Why doesn’t everyone just stop downloading and not buy any music either. Who would they blame then? I call for a boycott.

    I like to do things the honest way and I agree the music industry is not fair. We need to show them for the criminals they really are instead of giving them something to blame consumers for.

    Both sides are in the wrong here. We can get by just fine without obtaining any new music for a while. Its not like gasoline.

    BOYCOTT!

  • forgot one thing

    Another thing this article neglected was that casual music listeners are no longer buying albums. There’s no reason to. With itunes, popular singles are no longer driving album sales. For a while in the 90s, after the industry stopped selling singles for the most part, the only way to get a song you liked was to buy the album. A casual music listener used to spend $15 to buy a song they liked. Now they spend $0.99. That’s even cheaper than most cd singles did cost when they were around.

    It’s no wonder the music industry is losing revenue when the a large portion of their sales went from $15 to $1 in the matter of a few short years.

  • Hey Spork

    Where have you been for the last 8 years?

    http://www.boycott-riaa.com/

  • BigPirate

    What they need to do is start making Blu-Rays with a music content menu. So you buy the lets say “Disturbed 2009″ you would get all songs, videos and Reads all on the disc. If they start to invent some new things or ways to use the new age instead of trying to do CPR on CD’s they wouldnt be in this boat. They must realize humans are creators. We create new things, new ways of doing things. But I guess these CEO’s may not be humans after all.

  • gennove

    With last.fm I recently noticed that the need to buy music is out the door.
    I mean I choose my station and not only listen to music I like. But, also discover new bands.

    Best 3 bucks a month ever spent.
    goodbye itunes & brick & mortar cd stores i said bye to you back in 95 during the FTP search days.

  • peter

    Here are another 10 worth contemplating:
    1. Store stopped carrying singles.
    2. Record Industry went POP! Big Singles, big albums (Bon Jovi, Nsync, Backstreet, Britney).
    3. Uploading of CD’s into your computer with Gracenote.
    4. CD burners.
    5. Record stores changed to mall stores that sold only via price and positioning. No informed sales people.
    6. Radio centralization leads to more and more pin pointed programming – POP for girls!!
    7. Games as a competition.
    8. Media segmentation on TV, and Internet. Follow what you’re really interested in not what’s on.
    9. There is no underlying subculture that matters anymore. Its split up into tiny culturelets. Music is not the driver of youth culture anymore only the soundtrack.
    10. PRICE of CD’s!!

  • Weird Harold

    A couple of problems with all of this:

    1) The yearly sales figured are not adjusted for current value (7.83 1991 dollars is a higher number than 10.x in 2007, example). actual number is almost 11.9. Units shipped would be a better indicator

    2) The expansion of methods to play and enjoy music should have created a huge demand for music, and significantly increased sales. It didn’t, it created significant amounts of piracy and file sharing.

    3) The vast majority of people no longer consider music to have any true value as a product, and have little interest in paying for it.

    Basically, if you take the amount of music out there (total all Ipods and Zunes and other MP3 players) and figured out the value of it, and compared it to the actual income of the music industry, you would see that anywhere between 50% – 90% of the music out there wasn’t paid for. Based on the music out there in distribution, the industry should have doubled in size. Instead, it is smaller than it was in 1991, even with such signficantly improved distribution.

    Makes you wonder what really happened.

  • Pingback: Das Hömmel » Blog Archiv » How To Kill The Music Industry | TorrentFreak

  • andy

    another reason for the decline could be the music is just s**t and people are only buying decent music now!i myself own over 3,000 albums and roughly 9,000 singles on vinyl and about the same albums on cd.its cost me a fourtune most of which ended up in the record compies pockets not in the artists pockets where it belongs.what talent have the record compies got except how to steal and con talented people out of money.many years ago they would have been hung for highway robbery shame they stopped hanging.

  • Pingback: Guitar Zero » Archive » How To Kill The Music Industry

  • SLEEPY

    MANY THANK TO JERIS ROLAND FOR AN EXTREMELY INFORMATIVE ARTICLE.
    BUT FORGETTING THE ACTUAL FIGURES FOR A MOMENT I’D LIKE TO CONCENTRATE SPECIFICALLY ON ONE POINT HE RAISED THIS BEING:

    ‘International trade agreements have allowed consumers to buy their music across borders, rather than accepting local prices on music based on the ‘relative wealth’ of nations, rather than the actual value of the product.’

    LIVING IN A COUNTRY SITUATED IN NORTHERN EUROPE I GUESS THAT MEANT I PAYED THROUGH THE NOSE, WHILST OTHERS WERE ENABLED TO PURCHASE THE SAME ITEM FOR LESS,. AS HAVING BEEN LUCKY ENOUGH TO TRAVEL EXTENSIVELY DURING THE EIGHTIES I CAN TELL YOU THAT THE CHEAPEST PLACE TO BUY ALBUMS ETC’ WAS THE U.S.A.(ACTUALLY THE CHEAPEST WERE BOOTLEG (PIRATED.) COPIES FROM THE FAR EAST. BUT YOU TOOK A CHANCE ON QUALITY, AND IN A LOT OF CASES THE ORIGINALITY OF THE PERFORMING ARTISTS!)

    BASICALLY THE AMERICAN POLICY MAKERS DON’T CARE WHAT COMPANIES DO ABROAD. UNLESS IT IS SO PATENTLY ILLEGAL AS TO CAUSE INTERNATIONAL CONCERN, AND, AS LONG AS THEY DON’T ATTEMPT DO IT IN THE U.S..

    AS FOR THE FIGURES GIVE BY MR ROLAND I SEE THAT IN ’91 THE FIGURE WAS 7.83 (BILLIONS) THIS PEAKED IN ’99 AT 14.6 (BILLIONS) A RISE IN TURNOVER OF 6.73 (BILLIONS) OVER AN EIGHT YEAR PERIOD. ALTHOUGH IF I REMEMBER CORRECTLY THE MUSIC OF THIS PERIOD COULD NOT BE CONSIDERED AS GROUNBREAKING OR INNIVOTIVE WITH SCANT EXCEPTION AS IT WAS MAINLY LOVE BALLADS, MOURNFUL DIRGES, AND MUSICALLY REPETITIVE SEQUENCED RAP
    AND DANCE, ALL OF WHICH APPEARED IN THE PREVIOUS DECADE OR BEFORE, EVEN NOW WITH ARE CHARTS FILLED WITH THE REHASHING OF PAST GENRES THE BIG 4 MUSIC COMPANIES STILL HAVE THE NERVE TO CLAIM RESEARCH AND DEVELOPEMENT COSTS WHEN ALL SUCH MATTERS ARE ACTUALLY BEING UNDERTAKEN BY THE INDEPENDATS. AS FOR MOVIE DOWNLOADS CAN ANYBODY SAY THAT THEY WOULD NOT RATHER WATCH A FILM AT THE CINEMA WHERE SCREENSIZE AND PICTURE QUALITY FAR OUT PERFORM ANY ‘COPY’ THE FACT THAT OUGHT BE RECOGNISED IS MANY WHO D\L MOVIES THEN FEEL THE NEED TO EXPERIENCE THE D\L’D FILM ON THE ‘BIG SCREEN’. THE D\L SEEN AS MERELY A PREVIEW. AND THAT ‘COPYING’ HAS ITSELF CREATED A NEW CINEMA GOING AUDIENCE. THIS IS EVIDENCED BY THE INCREASED QUANTITY OF ‘BUMS ON SEATS’ AS WITNESSED BY CINEMA OWNERS IN THE PAST TEN YEARS OR SO. ADDED TO THEIR (THE FILM MAKERS, YES EVEN THE CORPORATE ONES LITIGATING AGAINST TPB, ALONGSIDE THE CINEMA AND MULTIPLEX OWNERS) UNDERSTANDING OF THEIR TARGET AUDIENCE. THEY CAN BE SHOWN TO HAVE EVOLVED TO EMBRACE NEW TECHNOLOGY AND ARE WILLING TO DO AS MUCH AS IT TAKES TO ENSURE THE SURVIVAL OF THEIR BUSINESS.

  • Pingback: Manifesto: Como matar a indústria musical @ Submusica

  • Pingback: Tasty Waves and a Too Late Now Bud :: Agent Bedhead

  • GLARFACE

    A FACTUAL TRUISM

    SUPPOSITION AND EXPECTATION DO NOT CONSTITUTE FACT. NOR DO HOPE OR SPECULATION CONSTITUTE TRUTH.
    THE TRUTH IS FACT AND FACT IS TRUTH

    THE FIGURES GIVEN BY THE PROCECUTION APPERTAINING TO LOST REVENUE SHOW THEY THINK OF SUCH THINGS AS ‘UNDENIABLE FACT’
    THE ‘TRUTH’ IS AS ALL HOLD DIFFERENT OPINION AND BY INFERENCE ‘TRUTHS’ IT IS FOR THE JUDGE TO DECIDE WHICH OF THESE ‘TRUTHS’ STAND UP UNDER SCRUTINY.

    MY ‘TRUTH’ IS THAT THIS CASE IS NO MORE THAN A SPECULATIVE PROCECUTION OR LEGAL ‘FISHING’ EXPEDITION IN SEARCH FOR SOME CIRCUMVENTION OF EXISTING ESTABLISHED COPYRIGHT AND INTERLECTUAL PROPERTY LAWS OF (THE SOVEREIGN NATION OF) SWEDEN. ATTEMPTS HAD ALREADY BEEN MADE TO DIS-ESTABLISH THOSE LAWS BY COERCION OF THE ELECTED PARLIAMENT BUT WERE REBUFFED. SO THE JUDICIARY WERE CONSIDERED FOR INVOLVEMENT.
    TO ENABLE THIS INVOLVEMENT THE PROCECUTION ‘FABRICATED’ CHARGES WHICH THEY BROUGHT AGAINST TPB, AND ITS ‘EXECUTIVES’ THESE CHARGES WERE CONSIDERED AS A SERIOUS ENOUGH BREACH OF THOSE LAWS TO WARRANT THESE COURT PROCEEDINGS.
    AS I’VE STATED BEFOR, (PROBABLY TO THE IRRITATION OF SOME HAHA) THE AMENDED CHARGES IN AND OF THEMSELVES WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN DEEMED OF SUCH SERIOUSNESS AS TO INSTIGATE LEGAL PROCEEDINGS. (WITHIN THE PARAMETERS OF SWEDISH COPYRIGHT AND INTERLECTUAL PROPERTY LAWS.) AND I WOULD CAUTION THOSE WHO BELIEVE TPB WILL ESCAPE ANY OR ALL LEGAL DAMAGE AS RESULT OF THIS TRIAL TO REMEMBER THIS.
    PERHAPS THE POLITICAL ‘FIX IS ALREADY IN’ (AS THE AMERICANS SAY) AND ALL THATS HAPPENING NOW IS THE WINDOW DRESSING AND GRANDSTANDING NECESSARY TO SHOW THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM AS INDEPENDANT.
    A BIT PARANOID? MAYBE, BUT IT WOULDN’T BE THE FIRST TIME IT’S HAPPENED AND IT DEFINITELY WON’T BE THE LAST!
    PERSONALLY I WOULD LIKE TO SEE TPB WIN BECAUSE THE RESULTING RAMIFICATIONS OFF SUCH A DECISION WOULD NO DOUBT CREATE HAVOC WITHIN THE SEEMINGLY GLOBAL AQUIESSENCE TOWARD THE AMERICAN SPONSORED LITIGATION\LOBBY STEAMROLLER AS DISPLAYED BY AUSTRALIA AND THE EUROPEAN UNION ETC’.
    ALSO BECAUSE THESE GROUPS (RIAA, IFPI AND OTHERS) REPRESENTED BY THE PROCECUTIONS LAWYERS ARE THEMSELVES JUST REPRESENTATIVES OF GLOBAL CONGLOMERATES (THE BIG 4) AND IT WILL BE THIS GROUP HELD AS LIABLE. SO THE FINANCIAL RECOMPENSE AND DESERVED FINANCIAL RESTITUTION THAT CAN BE CLAIMED BY THE DEFENDANTS WILL HAVE TO BE (IF I UNDERSTAND SWEDISH LAW ON THIS MATTER AND I DON’T) CONSIDERED ON THE PREMISE OF ‘ABILITY TO AFFORD’ RATHER THAN ‘JUST AND REASONABLE’ SO WOULD BE ASTRONOMICAL.
    THIS IS ANOTHER CAUSE FOR CONCERN HOWEVER FOR AS HAS BEEN SHOWN ABOVE THESE MEDIA CONGLOMERATES AND THEIR CEO MOGULS PROBABLY HAVENT GOT A POT TO PISS IN, BECAUSE THOSE THIEVING ‘PIRATES’ HAVE ‘STOLEN’ IT ALONG WITH EVERYTHING ELSE BOOHOO.. BOOHOOHOO….THE B$$TARD$… BOOHOOHOO… PA$$ THE…SNIFF!… TI$$UE$…BOOHOOHOO…SNIFF! SNIFF!
    BY THE WAY DOES SWEDEN LIKE BRITAIN HAVE LEGAL AID SUPPORT FOR NON NATIONAL NON RESIDENTS IF SO THERE MAYBE A FEW MUSIC INDUSTRY EXECUTIVES ON THEIR WAY TO MAKE USE OF IT.
    YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED!!

  • birdie

    amazing how everyone misses the fact that the bush administration was in power the last 8 years, waging wars…..does anyone think they wanted a healthy active music industry? hello out there!

  • me

    The truth is file sharing is like just looking for stuff cause you’re bored. Noone would buy the stuff they’re downloading……Like one time I was listening to the Monkeys greatest hits, ( was stoned) I woulds never walk into a store and buy that. Never!

  • jamrondun

    Piracy does diminish profits to all people in the music making pipeline. The Big 4, the little 4, musicians, engineers, composers, arrangers, et al are all losing money. Hopefully, a reasonable level can be reached where the creators of music have the ability to earn a living. If so, then we can look forward to a fantastic music future. If not, prepare yourself for the worst music in history.

  • Pingback: pligg.com

  • tweet

    218 birdie

    they also wanted (in the name of homeland security) unfettered warrant less access to anything from your internet connection.

    google ACTA

  • 655321

    Yeah–they probably know that, too–they’ve seen the studies that have been done. Does anyone have a serious answer: if they know that, then why are they making such a big deal?

  • 655321

    I wanna clarify–by “that” I mean they know that file sharing is not the culprit.

  • Rudolfo
  • gerard pawling

    wnew-fm 102.7 circa 1967 – 1976

  • Pingback: Anything Other Than File-Sharing To Blame For Music Industry Woes? | Trademark Law and Domain Name

  • Pingback: The Music Industry: Killed By Its Own Hand - How Fast Are You?

  • Jens Roland

    #220 jamrondun: “Piracy does diminish profits to all people in the music making pipeline (…) musicians, engineers, composers, arrangers, et al are all losing money.”

    I agree that when the recording industry hurting, so are musicians, composers, etc. This is very unfortunate, but unless a significant portion of the decline can be attributed directly to piracy, the solution isn’t litigation and regulation of file sharing.

    “Hopefully, a reasonable level can be reached (…) If not, prepare yourself for the worst music in history.”

    Copyright law has *never* helped the ‘quality’ of music, nor was it ever intended to. Real artists, be that in music, painting, or literature, will keep creating no matter what, and indeed most of what we call artistic masterpieces were created long before the ‘protections’ of intellectual property rights. If anything, IP rights have hindered artistic expression by making it so much harder for artists to get inspired by their peers and create derivative works. There is every reason to believe we would have *better* music if IP laws were abandoned, or better yet, revised.

  • Pingback: Piraten Berlin Blog » Blog Archive » Pirate Bay Prozess Tag 8

  • Charlie

    Remember the time when the VCR came? Movie outfits went nuts to shut it down. Did they win?

    Who do you think will win this time?

    History and logic is on whose side?

  • MusicisDead

    The music industry dug their own grave. Just turn on the radio and you can hear all the talentless hack popping out music like it is a factory.

  • the bane of ignorance

    This reminds of middle ages, when christianity was the ruling dogma in everything and fiercly resisted all technological progress that would hurt their belief in “God”, nowadays its the same thing, only now the same things happen because of the new god of our times-”Money”.

  • Pingback: Hur man tar död på musikindustrin « Paulwaper

  • Pingback: Jens Roland: “Hvordan drepe musikkindustrien” | Nettnavigatøren

  • nicole

    FRED DURST IS KILLING THE MUSIC INDUSTRY FO SHO.

  • Pingback: Images for the future - Research blog » blog archive » Interesting links

  • Bill_Brasky

    first and foremost the thing i htink killing the industry would be artists that actually have talent. if anyone knows, the artist usually makes most of their money on tour. if the artist has no talent to perform live, then they wont do so well. when you need an entier recording studio to make your “artist” sellable, then somethign is definatly wrong with the way music is produced.

  • Raiders757

    Great article, but do have to disagree with point number six.

    Sure, maybe there are more radio stations and a few more options these days, but the fact still remains that most all of radio has been consolidated into “best of” and top 40 playlists. Even with satellite radio, there still seems to less overall variety being played and less to discover. On top of all that, nobody, including satellite radio, plays the really great “deep track/cuts” anymore.

    Radio has grown old and tired. File sharing is the new radio, and the new way of true discovery for the diehard music fan. Radio has nothing to do with the industries woes, other than it’s just plain bad and more and more people are tuning out.

  • Anonymous

    it still doesn’t legitimize piracy – jackasses

  • latex conservative

    A great article, but you forgot a step that a few others I have seen in the comments section has pointed out: the quality of music has been faltering.

    Even with digital downloads, you still do not get that 30 million albums plus sales, in any form, from music any longer. I watched the other day when they made a big deal about this person selling 2 million CDs in one year. Even in the SoundScan era that’s very weak; compare that to the years of Micheal Jackson’s ‘Thriller’ and Guns & Roses’Appetite for Destruction’ and the album releases of Garth Brooks, and it’s pathetic. It’s ironic how they now talk up Katy Perry’s numbers as being equalled to Madonna’s talked down numbers as if Perry’s sales are mind blowing.

    The industry is lowering the bar in those numbers as well as quality, oddly enough. Maybe they do it so they can say ‘see, P2P is killing us!’. But I join everyone else here in saying that the music artists, as well as the music industry, should grow up, wise up, and understand they’re in this weak position because they, not us, had caused it.

  • Eliada

    Every word spoken here is 100% truth. This article has changed my perspective and further strengthened my resolve. Thank you.

  • JRBlood

    There’s one more thing that should have been added to that list.

    The new artists that the big 4 sign up suck!!! All of the crap that is released to the various media outlets (Especially the radio stations where I live) all sound the same, as if one big factory was pumping out clones of past “mega-stars”. The Hip-Hop, Rap, and Pop charts are especially full of no-talent, only-in-it-for-the-money wanna-bes.

    There’s a reason why the underground scene still lives, and the RIAA can’t touch it. We won’t allow it!!

  • Anon

    In response to an earlier concerning the question in the ’60s “Can I take something I own, copy it and give it to a friend?”

    Technically, you don’t own the recording. All you own is a license to listen to it. This means that even if you make a copy of your music and then break your original media, that it is still legal for you to listen to that music.

    The same thing goes for software. You don’t own a copy of Windows or Mac OS X, you own a license to use it.

    I have to agree with Jens on this one, the record industry has been in decline since the late 90′s and the fact that they refused to buy into the digital music industry really was slitting their own throats.

    Now that illegal file-sharing (NB: that’s sharing of illegal files, as opposed to all file-sharing) is rampant, it will be a lot harder for the assorted media industries to win back customers. People will not pay the same amount for a CD when they can get it for free from their computer, in a relatively similar quality.

    Concerning the current TPB trial, from what I’ve been reading, it seems that whilst the prosecutors have been supplying very convincing evidence, there has been nothing so far that actually incriminates TPB owners.

  • Will Goodfellow

    I also agree that the quality of music has declined rapidly, how many more similar sounding rap and r’n'b tunes can they churn out and expect consumers to buy?
    I doubt many, if any, popular artists today will be around in 25 years time, their longetivity is equal to their talent, short-lived if at all present.

    Also, let’s not forget that between 1995-2001, one of the biggest revenue growth periods according to the above chart, was during a period in which the five largest music companies were accused of price-fixing CDs and agreed a $143m settlement to make the case dissappear. They were accused of using a practice known as “Minimum Advertised Pricing” to artificially inflate the value.

    Strange how after this was exposed, CD sales revenues started to drop.
    I guess if you are willing to rip people off, don’t be surprised when the table is turned.

  • eye$

    Honestly, I agree with what you’ve said about the industry trying to peddle their product much too far by charging for every little piece of it. How can they blame the decrease in album sales on p2p, and – for some reason – specifically The Pirate Bay, when they have whittled their purchasing power by allowing the sale of such undersized product.

    The Music industry is probably plotting to attempt the take down of one torrent “heavy-hitter” in hopes that the rest will follow out of the fear of the same fate.

    I can’t see this ending well for the music industry until they start looking at the infrastructure. Ironically enough, that happens to be what the world’s economy needs right now.
    *ahem*
    What it is i’m trying to get at is that perhaps the music industry needs to take an awkward-long look at themselves and their surroundings, and take a big fat hint. The one that’s been staring them in the face since the Napster-fiasco in ’00.

    Don’t get me wrong, Metallica were right. Their music was being shared between thousands of people. But no one was making any money. How are they supposed to sue for the money they lost? I credit it to their own undoing (the band was having a rough time, their interpersonal issues, and not to mention, the cd sucked).

    Things don’t look up for the music industry right now, Unless you happen to be The Jonas Brothers or Mylie Cyrus.

    Check out my blog at http://enjoyyoureverysecond.blogspot.com for the old, the new, and the hidden gems of youtube and music.

  • Jonas B.

    The decline around 1994 is expected. The CD player became common in homes around 1990, and people started buying their old favourite albums on the new media.

  • Big labels

    Great post. It’s hard to deny that piracy doesn’t result in a lack of sales.

    I think a lot of people don’t like the big labels because they are these huge corporations that make a lot of money. Well they also play a big part in getting music out to the masses.

    Some of our greatest talent belong on these labels and without that talent, well the world will sound rather boring.

  • Pingback: Kaip Užmušti Muzikos Pramon? at Gru

  • Mark Evans

    I’m trying to take some deep breaths and let my blood pressure decline. I really, really hate these kind of “Monday morning quarter” back type of commentaries. I’ve been in the book industry for 20 years and did a 2 year stint at Tower Records (1999-2000) and have given this a lot of thought.

    These completely wrong-headed essays inevitably seem to want to justify what you all now have: lots of free music. The reality is that piracy and file sharing was, by far, the single biggest factor in the decline of the music industry. This is really pretty simple, guys.

    Were there other reasons that contributed? Clearly. But the reality is that many, many people who used to pay good (and steep) prices for music don’t any more.

    The other thing that these kinds of commentaries always rely on is the things they didn’t like about the way the labels did business. Well, guess what? That is the beauty of ownership, content, and free enterprise. The labels and artists OWNED this music. If they wanted to sell only to 10 people on earth and sell 1000 bundled CD’s ONLY and charge $1m each – well…THAT IS THE WAY THE MARKET WORKS.

    Please don’t list a litany of things that you didn’t like about their pricing, marketing, distribution method as why it is ok to steal music.

    As far as many other streams, on-line radio, etc. Many of these have been allowed to expand and flourish based on renegotiated rights that were agreed to based on the extreme pressure that labels were under to do *something*, *anything* to adapt given that the music was being shared freely. That is, file sharing itself helped to force these distribution methods into place and weaken the labels to the point of crying “uncle” and agree to almost any legit methods.

    As far as less music being consumed, that is simply not the case. More music is consumed now than ever before due to the omnipresent iPod (and the fact that it is effectively FREE to any one who wants to take the time to find it.) If you have actual data on decreased music consumed, I really would like to see it.

    Do I like greedy, big corporations like the record labels? No. Was I always happy to pay $18 for a CD? No. Would I prefer that more money goes directly to artists? Certainly. Those facts, as much as we might like them to, do not change the fact that these companies own this music and can sell however they see fit. Despite many claims to the contrary, the vast majority of artists want people to buy music even if from their labels.

    I especially love point (8) – the labels actually “love it”! Yes, they have done something to sell single tracks online – how does this have anything to do with the facts that (1) music industry revenues have declined steeply (2) the timing is exactly coincidental to file sharing expansion (3) kids today DO NOT, DO NOT pay for music?

    When I was in college (’85-’89) I bought lots and lots of CD despite being someone of fairly modest means: rent, beer, pizza, CDs. Would I do this today? Of course not. No need to pay for CDs.

    This essay is one big justification of file sharing. At this point, I say go ahead and do it (like you need my permission) but do you really need to spend effort to make it seem noble and justified? Do you really need a list of rationals on why it really isn’t the problem? You’re stealing – call it what it is.

    Mark Evans
    Ann Arbor, MI

  • vj EoN

    I’ve read this article with pleasure but a few things though.
    For those claiming filesharing started only a few years ago.
    Any old skool peeps here who still remember those BBS’ or even futher back in time or those massive events where people would drop by with their home computer and copy the latest games?
    I’ve started out with my old C64 back in the early 80′s and when I wanted to buy a game it was pretty hard.
    For the main reason that most stores couldn’t get the game or wouldn’t buy them as they thought it wouldn’t sell anyway.
    The other reason was that as a 10 year old child I didn’t have large amounts of money to spend.
    Even as a grown up with a steady job and extra income as artist I still don’t. :P

    And the ones who were being sold gave me a poor choice.
    Copying was for me a way of getting the games I wanted to play.
    If I didn’t write them myself.

    Later on in the 80′s CDs became available but the price was again too high for me.
    Compared to today the prices haven’t changed that much when the Euro was introduced here.
    Before I paid FL40,= (Old Dutch currency) for CD and it didn’t matter where I bought it.
    Today I pay 15 to 20 Euro for a CD and if I calculate it back to the old currency the price is even higher than back then.
    They tend to drop after a while but still remain too high.
    And again the same problem. How many times can you spend the money you have?
    Once in my eyes but if you believe in Ceditcards and such you might think otherwise.

    Today that market has changed but the music/movie industry are still living a pre-digital age while the rest of the world has moved on.

    I’m not saying that piracy doesn’t dent the gross income of these companies but if I would to believe only what they are saying I think the word naive would be an big understatement.
    Propaganda would be a word that comes pretty colse the way these companies use information and the way they try to inform you.
    Halftruths mainly.
    This article shows the other side of the coin.

    For years the big companies are controlling the market until the Interwebs became available for the masses. Keep in mind that even these days enough people think Internet is just webpages/sites.
    And what was the first thing they found, besides the porn, were sites where you could download the latest album of artists you never heard of or albums of your favourite artists you couldn’t buy in any stores near you.

    Another thing I’m missing is the cloning these companies use.
    How many albums are released that sound almost the same as most others by that company?
    Or movies?
    I wouldn’t even dare to post a list here of movies that are almost the same as any on that list.
    Pretty much the same absent storyline as all the others.
    Or what about music?
    How many boy/girl bands have we seen since the 50′s?
    How many Britney Spear clones are flooding the market?
    People change and their taste changes too.
    Or the repetitiveness on the radio of the same songs.
    I’m not going to buy an album when it played daily on the radio.
    After a while it starts to bore me and then annoy me.
    I have my own radio at work but the only stations I can get are the big ones all sounding the same.

    I’m going to close this one of with this.
    In the 70′s cassette tapes were destroying the music industry.
    In the 80′s VHS was destroying the movie industry.
    And they are still using the same argument as they did back then so have they been destroyed by that technology? :P

  • Pingback: Let’s talk anime industry! Blessed be thy Miko day! @ Period Blog

  • R.H.

    Just like the auto industry, it’s their failure to
    renovate and innovate. CD’s have always too expensive for what they are. Is anyone surprised that people jumped on an alternative to them? Major labels need to stop blaming the consumer for not buying what they are selling and start selling products worth their price tag.

  • What about

    And what about all the miljonair musicians? I for one will never add one cent to their allready extraordinary weatlh; money I have to work hard for every day.

    This whole music business is a scam and should be ashamed for itself.

  • Pingback: PoisonMushroom.Org - Combing the Net So You Don’t Have To » Blog Archive » What’s Killing the Music Industry?

  • AznMusicLuvr

    Also, your forgetting globalization. Japan is all the rage right now, alot of fans of final fantasy and other video games are listening to Japanese and Korean music…and Chinese rap 0.0
    Japan is the videogame music empire, nothing like it even exists outside, not even in the US.

  • Pingback: Hennessy Love Machine

  • timmay

    oH PLEASE-
    People so clearly do know exactly what ‘file sharing’ is!

    Its STEALING!
    Thats half the reason they do it!

    How else to explain that no one cares about QUALITY- otherwise MP3s wouldnt exist- only quantity-

    WHY the endless diatribes about how ‘It really NOT theft! No! See, because…etc.”

    You kill off the record co.s, fine. No there is no one to find, nurture, and promote bands -properly-

    the proof:

    Todays music!

  • Scooter Scotland

    The fact is they are flogging a dead horse. when sites such as last FM could charge users a small subscriptions fee then pay royalties based on radio plays it all makes perfect sense.. no viruses , no wipeouts and no hassles. Artists distributed without the labels. perfect…but what do they do? they try to stop it or at least limit it. they are panicing and are lost. Last FM was set up by two uni students and sold for £150M. if they can do it after 4 years study why can the industry..only one person will kill the industry, themselves…and good riddence to the lot of them.

  • Scooter Scotland

    PS – i think you will find that streaming media is the target now! is that stealing? wise up! people who file share also buy music…if they didnt file share they wouldnt buy music..stop thinking that they are detracting from otherwise generous sources of revenue.. we get charged 70p per song. noo distribution costs, no art work, no store wages to pay, no physical product…who is stealing really? makes me tired this ignorant argument

  • Pingback: So what is so wrong with the 360 deal? » MarkCarras.com

  • Fenris

    If you download a song for free to listen to that you would not have paid to hear had you had no choice but to pay if you wanted to hear it, then it cannot be stealing. You’ve not actually taken anything physical from anyone and you haven’t cost anyone money.

    What the industry never likes to mention is that if you took the estimate downloads of music and replace each one of them with actual album and single purchases to get the same material across, you’d see probably the biggest boom in the record industry ever. Even with all those other factors for it’s decline. That makes no sense, because those downloads would not have equated to actual sales.

    So what does that mean? That the illegal download means more people are hearing music then would have been had they been forced to buy.

    How can that be a bad thing for the future of music?

  • kazkas

    two more points:
    1. Record labels are now focused on main stream, minimising risks. That means more and more music from Big 4 are absolutely the same sh*t, so people turn to independent labels.
    2. Remember, how many times in 80s you bought an album you would listen 1 or 2 times only? Now with ability to listen songs and read reviews before buying CD so people now buying less, because buying what they really like only.

  • Jens Roland

    #242, Mark Evans:

    “Please don’t list a litany of things that you didn’t like about their pricing, marketing, distribution method as why it is ok to steal music (…) This essay is one big justification of file sharing”

    I need you to acknowledge that I *never* said it was okay to steal anything or to infringe on copyright. There are laws making those activities illegal, and I fully respect that. By assuming otherwise, you are repeatedly calling me a thief, or at least an instigator of crime. My article is not justifying anything, and you have some nerve to say that it does. It has to do with the *causes* of the recent decline in music revenues, since there are a lot of misconceptions that need clearing up. Including more than a few in your comment:

    As to the major labels allowing streaming sources due to pressure? That’s completely false. The labels have NEVER changed their practices until the business model could be PROVEN to make them more money. The tried vehemently to kill the LP, music on radio, the CD burner, the Rio, the cassette tape, and they *actually* killed the minidisc. *Any* new media format or initiative that might reduce revenues is met with litigation and cries of not “uncle”, but “wolf”. And *never* with acceptance due to ‘pressure’.

    I also never disputed corporations’ right to control their own business models, since they DO own the product and can do with it as they please. All I am saying is when the business model that ensured their high revenues withers, to keep their expectations realistic and not fool themselves about the reasons. And if they believe file sharing is “fully to blame”, they are plainly wrong.

    “If you have actual data on decreased music consumed, I really would like to see it.”

    You know as well as I do that such numbers are extremely difficult to come by. Not even the music industry has objective numbers on music consumption. But would you accept a documented decline in music sales? ;-)

    “kids today DO NOT, DO NOT pay for music”

    Any data on that? At all? Or is it just another assumption based on your mental model of the world?

    “(’85-’89) I bought lots and lots of CD (…) Would I do this today? Of course not”

    So because you are the type of person who would have downloaded music illegally (that you’d have bought otherwise), then by extension everyone else does the same? If that is your logic, then I see the problem. Personally, I don’t believe ‘kids’ who download 1.000 illegal music tracks are all kids who would have bought 1.000 tracks if the internet hadn’t existed – not even close. This is easily proven by the industry’s own numbers. The FACT is, the ‘kids’ who download what they can’t afford are the same ‘kids’ who used to record what they couldn’t afford on cassette tapes, and the ‘kids’ before them who used to listen on the radio to the records they couldn’t afford. I am actually trying to compile the blank cassette tape sales numbers right now, since I am suspecting that they will show that the high ratios of illegal downloads to legal purchases reported today will actually match the ratio of blank cassette copies to original albums back in the day. Disprove that, and you have a case.

    In conclusion, I think you should re-read my article, this time without assuming I am trying to endorse or justify illegal activities (how the hell you got that from my article is simply beyond me). I am trying to point out a major flaw in the scapegoating logic that is all too prevalent in the music industry. And you are guilty of the same jumping-to-easy-answers, when you say “piracy and file sharing was, by far, the single biggest factor in the decline (…) This is really pretty simple”. It is *not* that simple, and that is the point of my article. You cling to this assumption because it is simple and fits into your world view, but you offer no evidence to support your claim, and that is why my article was sorely needed.

  • Jens Roland

    Also, to the neverending list of commenters who seem to think the reason for the decline is that the “Big 4″ only release ‘crappy’ music, that is a very subjective argument, and one I would never make. What you call ‘crappy’ translates to ‘assembly line popular music’, which translates to ‘mainstream’, which translates to ‘big audience’, which translates to PROFITABLE. The ‘big 4′ have grown so big because they are really really good at making profitable music, and that hasn’t changed all that much. I’m not saying I love every television-born boy band, I’m just saying that is probably not what’s killing the big labels. They are just making the kind of music they know they can sell, and you can’t really blame them for doing that. The music *may* be crap to you, but it’s the kind of crap that people want.

  • BTGuard - BitTorrent Anonymously

NewsBits

Even more news...

  • The Pirate Bay Isn’t Down Completely, Just Having a Few Issues

    Twitter and Facebook, not to mention the TorrentFreak inbox, are currently alive with complaints that The...

  • Pirate Bay Founder Gottfrid Svartholm on Freedom of Speech

    Freedom of speech is a highly valued commodity, but should people be allowed to say whatever...

  • Blu-ray Anti-Piracy Tech Stops Discs and Promotes Purchases

    An anti-piracy system present in all official Blu-ray players since 2012 has received a fresh update...

  • Foxtel Breeds Pirates by Locking Up Game of Thrones

    One of the main reasons why people turn to piracy is the lack of legal alternatives....

  • UK Student Admits Breaching Sony Copyrights With Leak of PS3 SDK

    Last year an Internet user known as El Nomeo leaked version 3.70 of Sony’s Playstation3 SDK...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

PopularArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.