TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

IFPI Loses “Deep-Linking” Case Against Baidu

In 2008, Baidu was sued for around $9 million by Sony BMG, Universal Music and Warner Music for providing so-called “deep-links” to copyright music tracks. A court has now ruled that providing search results does not breach copyright law, clearing China’s biggest search engine of wrong-doing.

Search engine Baidu.com is not only China’s biggest, but also a major player globally. It recently grabbed headlines when it was hacked by the ‘Iranian cyber army’, the same outfit that took Twitter offline in December.

Baidu has become increasingly popular with the Chinese population for its MP3 indexing abilities. While its “MP3 Search” provides algorithm-generated links to millions of undoubtedly illicit copyright tracks hosted by others (so-called “deep-linking”), Baidu has always insisted that the provision of such links alone is entirely legal. Needless to say, IFPI, the global music group, disagrees strongly with this assertion.

“The music industry in China wants partnership with the technology companies – but you cannot build partnership on the basis of systemic theft of copyrighted music and that is why we have been forced to take further actions,” said John Kennedy, Chairman and Chief Executive of IFPI, in a February 2008 statement.

Bolstered by an earlier ruling against Yahoo China, by further actions Kennedy unsurprisingly meant “legal actions.” In early 2008, IFPI (Sony BMG, Universal Music and Warner Music) sued Baidu.com for $9m. Today the result of that case has been made public.

Beijing No.1 Intermediate People’s Court has cleared Baidu on accusations of copyright infringement, with a court statement showing that simply providing search results does not breach Chinese copyright law. According to lawyer Sun Yan, the case against the search giant fell because IFPI failed to identify the actual sites hosting the illegal music downloads.

IFPI has challenged Baidu – and lost – in the Beijing No.1 Intermediate Court before. In September 2005, IFPI filed claims regarding nearly 200 music tracks it claimed were made available via Baidu. In 2006, the Court ruled Baidu was not infringing copyright. IFPI appealed to the Beijing Higher People’s Court which upheld the earlier ruling.

Related Posts

Previous Post | Next Post

  • Mediaget
  • Download Torrents with BTguard

NewsBits

The latest news from around the web, not covered on the frontpage

  • RIAA: “Misinformation May Be a Dirty Trick, But It Works.”

    For years the RIAA has tried to convince the world that piracy is killing musicians. Supported...

  • Russia’s Largest BitTorrent Tracker Under Huge DDoS Attack

    RUTracker, Russia’s largest BitTorrent tracker, has been dealing with the effects of a DDoS attack over...

  • Reddit and WordPress Urge Congress to Shelve SOPA/PIPA

    A coalition of 70 groups, including Reddit and WordPress, are asking Congress to stop working on...

  • Turbobit.net Blocks US Visitors After MegaUpload Shutdown

    In the aftermath of the MegaUpload shutdown, file-hosting sites continue to change their services. After Uploaded.to,...

  • QuickSilverScreen Streaming Links Site Calls It Quits

    In the wake of the Megaupload raids and attacks on domains in the US and elsewhere,...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

RecommendedArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.