Less popular artists profit from filesharing
The rich get poorer and the poor get richer. That’s what filesharing does for the music industry. No wonder the RIAA is desperately trying to shutdown all filesharing activities.
A recent overview of the current literature on the effect of filesharing on record sales shows that the most popular artist (top 25%) sell less records. However, the remaining 75% of all artists actually profits from filesharing. How this is possible?
Easy, sharing increases the amount of artists you get familiar with. Especially BitTorrent sites are an excellent platform for promoting new, or less popular artists.
First of all, on BitTorrent sites the users decide what’s popular, not the radiostations, record labels and pluggers. Besides this, it’s far more easy to first download an album, listen to it, and then decide if you want to buy it or not. Sure, most of the people will not buy the album, but since you will probably tell tell your friends about this “great new album”, popularity will grow, and eventually the artist will profit from it.
An excellent example is the band Harvey Danger who offers the opportunity to download their album on their website. As soon as they decided to do this, their popularity grew. By offering their album as a download, they gained a lot of fans, collected donations, and probably sold more albums.
Something to think about…
Previously: BitTorrent & Firefox
Next: the MPAA and Bram Cohen are going to make a big announcement

88 Responses
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 » Show All
i totally agree with this…once i started DLing songs i got exposed to WAY more music i never would’ve bothered to hear…and bands i DO like i still go buy the CD to support them
I agree a bit. People should still support their favorite bands by buying cd’s
but.
the internet and filesharing offers a great opportunity for starting bands to reach the public. Personally I don’t need some guy in a suit to decide what kind of music I should listen to.
Take a look at http://www.jamendo.com/en/
This is how it should be, we should decide what’s good. Most of the money should go to the artists, not the 10% or less they get now.
yea, i wouldnt listen to 1/3 of the bands i listen to now if i couldnt download a track or two of theirs first. coz lets face it, just buy a random cd these days often leads to u buying absolute shit
If u don’t want to see this message again please write me your website link at: tuxcop@yahoo.co.uk Your URL will be immediately removed from Data Basea
If u don’t want to see this message again please write me your website link at: tuxcop@yahoo.co.uk Your URL will be immediately removed from Data Base
If u don’t want to see this message again please write me your website link at: tuxcop@yahoo.co.uk Your URL will be immediately removed from Data Basee
Oh o ho! very nice site!e
Hello people! Nice site!
I you all love!n
Fascinating site and well worth the visit. I will be back2
i love this site.e
Many interesting information on your site - keep up good work2
Your work is marvelous!!u
Check out my new site:)
Thanks so very much for taking your time to create this very useful and informative site. I have learned a lot from your site. Thanks!!k
You have built a good website
I\’l be back… :)
Nice site… Cool guestbook…+
Hi, everybodyi
Hello stupid pendosegi.b
This is very interesting site…a
I enjoy your site very much! THANK YOUs
Your work is marvelous!!e
2 references to this post
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 » Show All
Responses are closed
All remaining responses will continue to be archived. Thanks to all who made serious comments.