TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

OneSwarm: The Privacy Aware BitTorrent Client

Developed at the University of Washington, OneSwarm is a BitTorrent client that allows users to share files “anonymously” or with a specific group of friends. These features give users more control over their privacy, while maintaining a decent download speed. The client operates from within an Internet browser and is available for Mac, Windows and Linux.

oneswarmThose who’ve been reading TorrentFreak for long enough may remember how the MPAA and RIAA accused a printer at the University of Washington of copyright infringement a few years ago.

With their research, the researchers pointed out that gathering evidence on BitTorrent downloaders is full of pitfalls.

Perhaps not coincidentally the same research group is also behind the “privacy preserving” BitTorrent client OneSwarm, currently developed by Tomas Isdal and Michael Piatek, two PhD students at the University of Washington.

Unlike other regular BitTorrent clients, OneSwarm allows users to share files only with a selected group of friends. While regular and public BitTorrent downloads are also supported, the privacy settings allow users to obscure the source of a transfer by sending it through multiple intermediaries.

“Virtually everyone on the Internet is a content producer, but today we only have one model for sharing: sign over the rights to your work to a website, with the hope that it will respect your privacy,” researcher Michael Piatek told TorrentFreak commenting on the importance of privacy on BitTorrent.

“OneSwarm is an attempt to provide an alternative. Our view is that private data sharing is an essential service in free and open societies,” he added. How the various privacy settings work is explained in detail in the video below, posted by the OneSwarm team.

Although OneSwarm has been in development for a while, the researchers have made its source available on GitHub in an update this week. Binaries and the source code are available for Windows, Linux, and Mac OS X platforms.

We tested OneSwarm, and although the browser interface is something you have to get used to, the download speeds are more than reasonable. This is also confirmed in one of the academic papers published by the OneSwarm team (pdf). In a performance comparison they found that it outperformed other “private” sharing options such as Freenet and BitTorrent over Tor.

Users have to be aware though, that while using the ‘public’ mode transfers are not anonymized.

That said, an Open Source effort to allow more privacy controls for BitTorrent users is something that can only be encouraged. The next step many BitTorrent users are looking forward to is the arrival of a fully anonymized BitTorrent client with decent speeds.

Related Posts

Previous Post | Next Post

  • Jse

    This isnt that safe
    and will open people up to conspiracy to commit copyright infringement charges

    • Anonymous

      It allows Plausible deniability http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plausible_deniability

      HEY…… if your iP is on that Hurt Locker List……..

      Say you where using OneSwarm …or Tor ….or you have open WiFi etc…….

      Plausible deniability

      • Anonymous

        I don’t see any America Court caring about that at this point…. They’d shut the whole thing down just to stop 1 pirate.

        • Anonymous

          True…..
          But ……happily for Good , Nice people…. who Care 2 Share……..

          Shutting down filesharing networks……would require cutting the whole .net….

        • Anonymous

          …………..t….r.u………………….e………………………

      • SomeAsian

        Unfortunately the people prosecuting thousands think that an IP address is a person and that they can sue them till the day they die. To those retards, an IP is undeniable proof.

        • Anonymous

          i don’t know…. my opinion….I doubt that they are actually that stupid…..
          They do act stupid…. And lie to courts to get personal details behind ip addresses…. They do it for cash..

          eg… The Hurt Locker…. ip address… personal info PHISING saga…
          If every person (x25,000) pays $400 to stay away from court , that will rake in a cool 10 million dollars….

          They think a pay up or else scam as a revenue stream…. A sinister way to extract cash from people using fear of prosecution to scam people into paying…..

      • Whatever

        I don’t see any mention in the article of random pieces forwarding without knowing final destination so there is no Plausible deniability. Such a function would be the first thing to mention.

        What plausible deniability would that be ?: “I was only sharing with friends, really… Oh, i got the setting wrong, can i go now?”
        Somehow i don’t think that will work.

        Freenet on the other hand has plausible deniability because you don’t know what is going in and out of your system all the time.

        BTW: Didn’t see the video (Still no x64 flash) and didn’t want to bother opening another browser so maybe they do have some inventive solution.

        (Hoping for smart solutions in future where websites, DNS and torrents are safe decentralized in a Freenet style setup. An idea for cached pieces is to have only the pieces or the keys but never both within the cache for even better plausibility)

    • Anonymous

      If this was integrated into both Tor and I2P, this would’ve been a GREAT idea.

      • Anon

        Copy and paste:

        Privacy-Implications of Performance-Based Peer Selection by Onion-Routers: A Real-World Case Study using I2P

        Into Google…

    • http://www.facebook.com/eric.boehm Jack Murdock

      No P2P app is anywhere near as people like to believe it is. Bittorrent was once hailed as the safer, fool proof alternative to direct downloads, but torrent freak themselves have demonstrated how easy it is to identify the peers/seeders in a swarm.

      The truth is that nothing is anonymous. Date can be intercepted by any government agency with the resources and know how. Simply downloading tor wont make you impossible to find.

      • Trespass

        I’m pretty confident no one will find me with running a tor proxy inside a vpn that keeps no logs. Not impossible to find, but more trouble than it’s worth. Three continents involved…

        • Friend of the People

          Yeah, but most people can’t set that stuff up. I can’t. They’re not going to go after you, they’d go after me.

        • Ugly American

          Consider a seedbox located in West Bubblefvck – Murdock will gladly help you pay for it. He’s a humanitarian who believes in sharing… <3

        • http://disqus.com/ Rob8urcakes

          Cool :)
          But wouldn’t it be easier to use TMG’s ftp servers in France?

        • Whatever

          Yes.

          When do you upload :-)

        • Fff

          1st rule of p2p data always has to find a way to get to the last IP bounce, if someone wants to find u , its easier then u think ,

        • Bragg_lamerton

          shut up dude.

      • Scary Devil Monastery

        Bittorrent was never hailed as a “safe fool proof alternative”. The popularity of bittorrent is all from the fact that the protocol is wonderful at bypassing low-bandwidth bottlenecks and high latency by swarming the transfer.

        And no, although you can see ip’s in a swarm you still get those 12% error margins enabling you to mistake a laser printer for a seedbox.

        You are certainly correct in that sufficient resources will allow you to track down a Tor user in due time, if he stays online for long enough. But here’s a hint. Those resources don’t exist for anything less urgent than, say, tracking down Bin Laden and Al Quaeda top dogs.

        That’s the same principle which applies for securing your own home. Most people stop at the level of installing a certified secure door (which can still be opened by a sledge hammer or any of your chose pick of power tools) instead of with a vault door (for which you might need a cutting torch but which can still be opened).

        What you are looking at then is simply a level of anonymity sufficient enough to discourage a government or private operation from throwing over a million dollar’s worth of resources in finding you. And that level of anonymity is laughably easy to achieve.

        • http://twitter.com/icanhazsake O Rly Owl

          That! Or you can jail every1 =)

      • http://twitter.com/icanhazsake O Rly Owl

        Well, if every1 is sharing the data flow then you’ll have to put every1 in jail. So yes, it’s fail proof. And I’m laughing @ govt trying to monitor every packet envrypted with 256… Oh yea I’m laughing.

        Govt will have to shut down the internet Jackie. Not feasible without some MAJOR uproar.

    • SomeAsian

      Are you saying that if one person in the group is charged, that all persons in the private swarm can be charged with conspiracy to commit copyright infringement??

      If this is the case, I agree. But I guess if you trust the people you share with, you will be fine.

      And when the day comes that an anonymous bit torrent client appears with 1mb/s minimum down speed is that day that I will start shitting bricks of pure gold.

  • Jake

    Tomas Isdal and Michael Piatek should watch their mailbox. Some lawyers are preparing to bill for them for a very large amount.

    • Zzzzzz

      Jake’s only got a few brain cells but he knows all their names and which ones aren’t talking.

    • Anonymous

      It is just software that creates “CLOUD” based network storage.

      “” Some lawyers are preparing to “” …… …FAiL

      they could make a new law to kill OneSwarm….

      conspiracy to commit anonymity….. would you like that Jake ?

  • Guest

    Jake=Jse=Troll/paid

    • Moxie

      Jackie-boy is clearly so desperate that he’s resorted to “multiple” identities to continue his failing smear campaign

    • Jse

      jse = just steal everything
      i’ve had this handle for over 10 years

      and my point is apt, if you create a small group of close knit peers it will eventually get infiltrated as happens all the time on place such as freenet who implement similar technology.

      get your fact straight before acussing me of being someone i am not!

      • Drewh1991

        Not if you know them personally.. Between me and my friends we could share a whole lot.

      • Scary Devil Monastery

        A typical “web of trust” may be possible to infiltrate, sure. But we ARE talking about quite a few tens of thousand “webs of trust” where you’d have to infiltrate quite a lot of them merely to make a noticeable impact.

        And that assumes you won’t get a stealthnet-like solution of total anonymity for I2P/F2P as well. Honestly, i don’t think there’ll be a problem as we’ll be looking at a relatively seamless merger into stealthnet/P2P hybrids pretty soon.

      • Scary Devil Monastery

        A typical “web of trust” may be possible to infiltrate, sure. But we ARE talking about quite a few tens of thousand “webs of trust” where you’d have to infiltrate quite a lot of them merely to make a noticeable impact.

        And that assumes you won’t get a stealthnet-like solution of total anonymity for I2P/F2P as well. Honestly, i don’t think there’ll be a problem as we’ll be looking at a relatively seamless merger into stealthnet/P2P hybrids pretty soon.

      • Kaiesh2

        yes thats why they say choose strangers…

  • Pingback: OneSwarm: The Privacy Aware BitTorrent Client | Torrentfreak.com

  • Overboardkiller

    does this mean it uses your friends connection? extreme example: you only have 2 friends named Jse and Jake :P they both have dial up connections but they are friends with 100 other people who are sharing a movie. when you download does this mean you will only go at dial up speed?

  • Overboardkiller

    does this mean it uses your friends connection? extreme example: you only have 2 friends named Jse and Jake :P they both have dial up connections but they are friends with 100 other people who are sharing a movie. when you download does this mean you will only go at dial up speed?

    • Ded E E Ee

      Something like that.

  • Nicolai

    But how does it work?
    /me wants spec :p

  • Nicolai

    But how does it work?
    /me wants spec :p

  • Bittorrent

    So it still relies on bittorrent files & public trackers?

    • Bla

      No. But it can download normal torrents too (non anonymously.)

  • yuumei

    “arrival of a fully anonymized BitTorrent client with decent speeds.” Its already here! Its called I2P.

  • Anon

    Good more darknets please.

  • Anon

    Good more darknets please.

  • Derc

    Darknets for the mass…FTW.

  • Anonymous

    The MAFIAA has been identified as damage. Rerouting… Rerouting…

  • I am a sausage not a hotdog

    Interesting the first thing I looked for was if it were multi-platform.:)

  • lolwat

    I don’t really like F2F (friend-to-friend) things on the Internet; it’s a good idea and all, but I don’t hate that many friends. ;(

    • Bla

      Indeed. There are “community servers” for OneSwarm though, if you want to connect to strangers (less secure…)

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_HQJLVQ5IPKXA33X2D3EVRT64YE Kiv Kuu

    Wow that really does make a lot of sense when you think about it. Wow.
    total-anonymity.eu.tc

    • flagged

      spam

  • Pingback: P2PTalk » OneSwarm: The Privacy Aware BitTorrent Client

  • http://www.facebook.com/eric.boehm Jack Murdock

    Neat app I guess. It’s always neat to see what 3rd party developers are pulling off. Private data sharing is essential in a free society, I would agree. Private sharing of copyrighted material not so much. Free society’s don’t tell you what do so long as it doesn’t negatively affect others.

    It’s a pity, because we all know that breakthrough apps like this have great potential for legal uses. But people will undoubtedly use them for things outside the law, which hurts the image of the developers.

    • http://Megarelease.net Billhilley

      Just who’s law are you talking about there pal. Do you mean the American world police? Last I checked file sharing for personal (non commercial) use is still legal here in Canada…

      • http://www.facebook.com/eric.boehm Jack Murdock

        Canada can’t seem to make up it’s mind. One the one hand, non commercial file sharing is legal, yet canada has agreed to uphold copyright. Copyright law isn’t exclusive to the states. Little known fact : every country part of the world trade organisation (thats a lot of them fyi) is bound by it.

        • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_PXX4S66KOUIGIKTTIMV3CBGO7Y Colin

          Er…no Jack. WTO member states have their own laws since they are soverewign independent nations rather than additional American states. These laws address copyright in different ways according to how law developed in these countries over the centuries.
          Sadly, Big Bully America, at the behest of MAFIAA lobbyists, is spreading American style laws to more and more countries. I think it’s time Saudi law was foisted on the USA, eg no women allowed to drive, possession of alcohol punishable by public flogging & imprisonment etc.

    • Bla

      But sharing of copyrighted material hurts no-one. Authors can put up a paypal button and/or sell their stuff directly, and they do/will get money because people who like their work do pay if they can. If they can’t, it’s a good thing they can get it for free. Bittorrent is also the best way to distribute data on Internet, it costs almost nothing to the original source.

    • Bla

      But sharing of copyrighted material hurts no-one. Authors can put up a paypal button and/or sell their stuff directly, and they do/will get money because people who like their work do pay if they can. If they can’t, it’s a good thing they can get it for free. Bittorrent is also the best way to distribute data on Internet, it costs almost nothing to the original source.

  • DocGerbil100

    Is it just my warped imagination, or does OneSwarm have a very odd logo? On one level, it looks like a stylised letter T. On another, it looks like a dangling pointy blue penis with a single enormous white testicle behind it. That seems like rather a back-handed piece of symbolism by the designer, but at least it’s a rather nice shade of blue.

    More pertinently, OneSwarm may have resolved some of the practical issues common to onion-based routing, but it doesn’t address some of the most serious issues of legality.

    Plausible deniability on paper is not the same as plausible deniability in practise – and this, in turn, is a long way from having sufficient legal credibility in the first instance.

    • Normal BT clients can be used and are used for a wide range of perfectly legal distributions, even if the quantity of legal material can’t hope to match the quantity of pirated works.

    • Normal onion-based networks can be used and are used to communicate anonymously, a guaranteed right in most civilised countries. That’s what they are designed for and the sharing of large files seems to be highly discouraged by users in most networks.

    • In contrast, OneSwarm’s only purpose is to hide what users are downloading via bittorrent. Who can say with a straight face that they feel that they or that other users should be able to download Linux ISOs or family photo albums anonymously? Why would anyone else care? What plausible reason could a user have for using this, as opposed to a normal BT client, if they are not using it for something the courts might take an interest in?

    Perhaps I’m just suffering an imagination-failure, but I have a hard time visualising this as playing out well for users in a court of law. If anything, I can see users becoming more vulnerable to attack, rather than less, simply because they are attempting to hide their downloads.

    Does the client announce itself as OneSwarm to the network? Instead of making them safer, that could very easily make every last user into a big, fat juicy target – I think the authorities are likely to assume they must be downloading something illegal, even if they can’t know what it is until they turn up with a search & seizure order.

    What’s more, if the MAFIAA or the authorities seize users’ computers and they all turn out to be using the network purely for piracy purposes, it could generate some very bad legal precedents for the makers of regular BT and Tor-type networks.

    I’m all in favour of file-sharing – and good moves to protect users’ privacy are more than welcome – but this technology seems to me like it will do far more harm to us than good. :/

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_PXX4S66KOUIGIKTTIMV3CBGO7Y Colin

      You’re saying that using OneSwarm is a bit like hiding your pervy picture book inside a science textbook, the act of hiding implies some sort of guilt. But in civilised countries the law presumes you are innocent until PROVED guilty, not just acting suspiciously.
      However, I suspect this question of innocence until proved otherwise may need some heavyweight legal prodding by the EFF and others to establish what is supposed to be already a basic principle of law.

      • DocGerbil100

        I wouldn’t use analogies for this – the principle of OneSwarm is simple enough that anyone can understand it: OneSwarm is a bittorrent client that allows its users to hide their identities by downloading files on behalf of each other, instead of directly.

        The principle of ‘innocent until proven guilty’ is unquestionably an important part of most western countries’ laws. So is the principle of ‘grounds for suspicion’. If nobody can think of a plausible reason to use this anonymous network (as opposed to regular bittorrent), I think it’s going to cause real problems for its users.

      • Friend of the People

        The law presumes you are innocent until proven guilty for criminal charges. If any of these organizations decide to prosecute for damages in civil court, then a pirate could be found liable for damages to the organization and the artist, even if there is not enough evidence for a criminal charge. Civil cases work on the idea of preponderance of evidence instead of innocent until proven guilty. In these cases, the use of a bittorrent client whose only unique value is to hide pirates could be seen as evidence against the user. Unless an alternate use could be found and adequately defended, this client poses a risk of making a user look guilty in the eyes of a civil court

        • Jon7272

          i c your point but what movie are they sharing its anonymous you have to have proof of the movie if say disney is taking you to court for wall e how do they know its wall e being shared

      • Friend of the People

        The law presumes you are innocent until proven guilty for criminal charges. If any of these organizations decide to prosecute for damages in civil court, then a pirate could be found liable for damages to the organization and the artist, even if there is not enough evidence for a criminal charge. Civil cases work on the idea of preponderance of evidence instead of innocent until proven guilty. In these cases, the use of a bittorrent client whose only unique value is to hide pirates could be seen as evidence against the user. Unless an alternate use could be found and adequately defended, this client poses a risk of making a user look guilty in the eyes of a civil court

      • Anonymous

        We’re no longer a civilized country, I guess. We torture people like in the Spanish Inquisition, and everyone is guilty of something, especially if they like privacy. Hell, now police are smashing peoples’ doors down in the middle of the night and machine gunning innocents in front of their families without getting in trouble.

        We don’t live in a civilized country anymore, my friend. Welcome to the jungle, courtesy of DC.

        Change we could believe in. . . right?

        • Zar

          Who is ‘we’? TINW!

          (Not everyone lives in your small part of the continent of America.)

    • Anonymous

      I can think of many reasons why anonymous sharing of legal data would be essential, especially in repressed regimes. The problem with the internet is that, while it can be very empowering, it also provides an extreme level of data mining ability that oppressive governments can use against leigitimate political dissidents.

      It’s unfortunate that many of the large corporate net companies hold their clients’ privacy in low regard, but something like this shines a light of hope on the matter.

      Just think about how such a thing could be useful in countries like China or Egypt. You KNOW those governments are spying on, and data mining everything their citizens are doing (. . . and you KNOW they’re also doing that here. . . in the “land of the free . . . or something like that, I’ve heard).

      Personally, I’d be very interested in a completely anonymous, decentralized way to send family pictures, and other trivial stuff DIRECTLY to people. I’m not into the whole Facebook, share everything about your personal life with government and advertizers sort of thing. . . call me crazy. Privacy would be nice, even with the most trivial things.

      I agree with the makers of the software. If people use it for other purposes, it’s their own issue, and the philosophy can be argued seperately, but it’s quite true that in a free society, the ability to securely send information without snooping eyes is very important. Our culture has lost too much of that. A government that believes everything should be secret, but everything WE DO has to be public and open to scrutiny. HORRIBLE double standard, don’t you think?

    • Betablock

      Folders can be shared.
      There is a search function.
      OneSwarm is it’s own system, independent of other networks traffic obligations.

      You seem to assume without researching. Why is your perception of legality to be looked at differently?

  • suze

    Anyone else totally underwhelmed by this?

    • Betablock

      Expecting a life changing moment?

  • LOL

    soon to happen:
    people looking for “private swarms of friends”

  • Pingback: OneSwarm, cliente BitTorrent contra la censura para compartir archivos “anónimos” — Bitelia

  • Pingback: OneSwarm, cliente BitTorrent contra la censura para compartir archivos “anónimos” | BytNews

  • Pingback: OneSwarm, cliente BitTorrent contra la censura para compartir archivos “anónimos” |

  • http://modmyi.com/forums/iphone-4-new-skins-themes-launches/740147-neurotech-hd.html#post5637502 Jay

    I’m still trying to get Fetch.io to work.

  • Pingback: OneSwarm, cliente BitTorrent contra la censura para compartir archivos “anónimos” | Linkeando: La Isla Buscada

  • radioman

    i’m sick of this hiding, maybe it would be better to go back live in caves… private caves ;/

  • Pingback: OneSwarm Restricts BitTorrent Downloads To Just Your Friends | Lifehacker Australia

  • Pingback: OneSwarm: ‘Cause Privacy Matters : P2P ON!

  • Pingback: OneSwarm Keeps Big Brother Out of Your BitTorrent Hair by Restricting Downloads to Just Your Friends [Video]

  • Pingback: OneSwarm, un cliente de BitTorrent que preserva tu intimidad | Disquisiciones - Lo que se cuece en Internet

  • StevO

    Vote for Ron Paul, hes against government internet regulating. watch 3:08 – 3:14
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v … or even watch to 5:39. Thats about big business influencing the government.

    • Bogler

      Another poster that thinks the world lives in Merka…

  • Pingback: OneSwarm Restricts BitTorrent Downloads To Just Your Friends

  • Pingback: P2PTalk » OneSwarm: ‘Cause Privacy Matters

  • Pingback: OneSwarm, cliente BitTorrent contra la censura para compartir archivos “anónimos” | SOLO INFORMATICA, POR MANUEL MURILLO GARCIA

  • http://disqus.com/ Rob8urcakes

    What’s the difference between privacy and piracy?
    Nothing!

    Both protect ordinary people from being unfairly raped by corporations whose sole raison dêtre is a fevered and frenzied pursuit of ever-increasing profits regardless of a decent standard of business ethics or law or even basic human rights.

    The crazy asswipes are now declaring war on their own customers ffs.
    And US politicians are going along with it.

    Well, to quote Sam Goldwyn (of MGM), “include me out”.

  • pepsy

    Hey Oneswarm is really old :S?

  • Pingback: OneSwarm: Comparte tus archivos via P2P de forma anónima : Soft Zone : Blog sobre Software con tutoriales de ayuda y noticias

  • Anonymous

    There are many ways of staying anonymous on the internet using temporary email addressees is one way.

    Here is an easy free to use tool which makes using temporary email addresses easy: http://www.spamratings.com/consumers/the-cleanzer-tour

    • Guest

      spamratings=spamtwattings
      /facepalm

    • Bam

      spammed

  • BTGuard - BitTorrent Anonymously

NewsBits

Even more news...

  • The Pirate Bay Isn’t Down Completely, Just Having a Few Issues

    Twitter and Facebook, not to mention the TorrentFreak inbox, are currently alive with complaints that The...

  • Pirate Bay Founder Gottfrid Svartholm on Freedom of Speech

    Freedom of speech is a highly valued commodity, but should people be allowed to say whatever...

  • Blu-ray Anti-Piracy Tech Stops Discs and Promotes Purchases

    An anti-piracy system present in all official Blu-ray players since 2012 has received a fresh update...

  • Foxtel Breeds Pirates by Locking Up Game of Thrones

    One of the main reasons why people turn to piracy is the lack of legal alternatives....

  • UK Student Admits Breaching Sony Copyrights With Leak of PS3 SDK

    Last year an Internet user known as El Nomeo leaked version 3.70 of Sony’s Playstation3 SDK...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

PopularArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.