Pirated by iTunes, Artist Turns to BitTorrent
Written by enigmax on February 06, 2008The Flashbulb, aka Benn Jordan, became so outraged when he discovered that iTunes was effectively pirating his music, that he uploaded copies of his latest album to BitTorrent. TorrentFreak caught up with Benn to learn more about the decision to stop distributors and ‘coked-up label reps’ from getting all the cash.

An established, but outraged musician has decided to shun conventional distribution methods by following other recent initiatives (such as Radiohead’s ‘In Rainbows’ promotion) by making his latest album available for free download. It’s available on BitTorrent on sites like The Pirate Bay, with so-called ‘OiNK replacement’ site, What.cd, providing the album on ‘free leech’ to encourage more downloads.
TorrentFreak caught up with Benn Jordan who told us he’s not just disillusioned, he’s ‘outraged’ that iTunes is selling his work without permission and seemingly keeping all the money.
TF: Please tell us a little bit about yourself and your musical journey.
Benn: I’m Benn and I’m 29 years old. I started playing classical guitar when I was about 5, and since then, all I’ve wanted to do with my life was make music. Now 20-some odd years later, I feel lucky to tell you that I make music for a living. I’ve been releasing albums for about 14 years on various indy labels, and in the last 5 years I’ve also been composing for television, film, and ads. Music has allowed me to travel the world, meet thousands of wonderful people, and express myself through my work. It seems impossible to me that I’m on this planet for any other reason than writing music.
My label, on the other hand, doesn’t have a complex or radical plan. Our goal is to simply compensate our artists as much as possible, and that includes utilizing the “digital revolution” to our advantage, instead of punishing our artists by punishing their fans.
TF: Tell us a little about your dealings with labels and ‘the industry’ and why you became disillusioned.
Benn: Luckily, my record contracts were always negotiated well. Once things started moving with small labels I was approached by some larger ones, but there was always some seedy stipulation that prevented me from ever signing.
Still, with a 50/50 contract, I’d be selling 2,000 albums and would get $250 for it somehow. Many people that i’d meet at my shows would say that they bought my music on iTunes, yet I’ve never signed any sort of agreement allowing iTunes to host my music, and I’ve certainly never seen a dime of money for my albums hosted there.
So I started investigating the numbers from the label, which led me to some shocking revelations about how little the artist and label was getting in comparison to the retailers. When I got around to asking about iTunes, the owner of Sublight Records pleaded with me to “leave it be”. Everyone else made an extraordinary effort to ignore my calls and emails.
When I finally got a hold of the digital distributor (I must note that “digital distributor” is the most pathetic job title I’ve ever heard), I was told that once the files are in the iTunes system, it literally couldn’t be removed or taken down for a year. So, either Apple has created a self-aware doomsday machine that cannot be stopped or reasoned with, or everyone involved is just enjoying the gravy train of ripping off artists like myself and using Apple’s backbone of attorneys as an intimidation factor.
Even after having a lawyer working for me on this matter, this is the one and only response we’ve EVER been able to get from Apple:
Dear Benn,
I understand that you are writing to the iTunes Store because you are upset about finding your own album “The Flashlight” and some of your other album as well on the iTunes Store, and that you feel that you are owned
royalties for this music that his being purchased. I am sorry that you have to found this upsetting. My name is Wendy, and I would be happy to link you to right people to talk to about this issue
So, who’s the pirate I should go after? A kid who downloads my album because it isn’t available in non-DRM format and costs $30 on Amazon? Or a huge multi-billion dollar corporation that has been selling thousands of dollars worth of my music and not even acknowledging it?
I’m not disillusioned, I’m outraged, and anyone who ever spent a dime on buying music through these distribution methods should be outraged too. Here we are pleading with people to not steal music, and then we hand them dog shit when they go out of their way to buy it.
TF: You were a member of OiNK. Could you tell us a bit about your time there and how you used the site?
Benn: OiNK was an amazing network. As an avid-collector of ultra-rare old jazz records, I’ll tell you right now that it was the most complete and diverse library of music the world has ever seen. I filled some requests by uploading some of my rarer albums there. Eventually I started being harassed by someone on the network who was sending screen grabs of my seed lists to record labels. Upon complaining, a moderator simply removed my ability to communicate with anyone on the network or post comments on torrents. I can understand the paranoia and strictness.
I guess I just sort of laughed it off and stopped using it. When Oink went down, the only thing that surprised me was that the servers weren’t hidden in some weird country.
TF: Could you tell us more about the support you’re getting from one of the so-called ‘OiNK replacement’ sites, ‘What.cd’ ?
Benn: It was really a fresh breath of air for What.cd to promote the idea of artists having involvement with their own torrents. Not only does it benefit the artist to no end, but I can’t imagine that any court in the world would be able to pin someone on copyright infringement for a torrent the copyright holder created.
TF: Aside from uploading your own albums, at times you took an anti-piracy stance at OiNK, why the big change of heart?
Benn: I don’t think my stance has changed all that much. It’d be a great PR move to say that I’m pro-piracy, but I’d be lying. I keep seeing these internet news stories saying things like “The Flashbulb Promotes Piracy”. It is totally out of control. How could I be promoting piracy if I’m uploading my own material with a “buy it if you like it” message in the torrent?
What I’m promoting is the artist’s freedom to choose what can and can’t be done with his/her music, and more importantly, the listener’s freedom to do what he/she wants with their own computer, MP3 player, or internet connection.
After a journey through miles and miles of bullshit in this industry, you learn one thing: If you want something done right, you’ve got to do it yourself. Whether you’re downloading my music to check it out, to accompany the CD, or even pirating it…I want you to have a version/rip of it that I’ve listened to and approved of.
TF: You say you’re not pro-piracy yet you downloaded stuff from OiNK and also What.cd. One position seems to conflict the other. How do you explain this?
Benn: In my case I think that visible list of downloads strengthens my point. Most of those downloads are actually albums I already own (much easier to download than to record an entire vinyl album), albums I previewed but didn’t like, or albums I simply cannot find available in a suitable DRM-free format (including CD). Some of the software, like the TomTom DVD on my list, is actually impossible to technically “pirate” because you can’t buy a US TomTom GPS unit without the software. The thing is, when a tracker gets busted, the companies count these towards their losses.
So, my new album currently has 6381 downloads at the time of this interview on what.cd alone. Using that deceitful equation, my losses are over $100,000. If I wanted to, I could subtract those losses from my profit and completely get out of paying any income taxes. It makes sense from an evil, corporate, criminal-minded standpoint, right?
Beyond that, iTunes and other services simply are not acceptable to me. No company will have any control over a product that I legally own after I buy it, period.
Oink was the biggest music library in the world. People didn’t use it because they were criminals, people used it because it was literally better than any service you could pay for. It was the stubborn behavior of the record labels, artists, and government that wouldn’t allow that music library to have a cash register at the front door.
The thing RIAA is scared of is that their billion dollar backbone can no longer shelter people from exploring music themselves. Their business plan had evolved into telling the world what they will want to listen to and buy, and now they’ll have to actually compete with talented artists again. As the people regain control of the market, music will be judged by it’s content again and will be subjected to it’s own Darwinism. It is a very interesting time for the music industry…and since my entire life is devoted to making music, bring it on. I hope that this situation with my new record proves to other labels and artists that giving people exactly what they want is the smartest way to conduct any business.
TF: How do you feel about people being heavily punished for sharing music?
Benn: Obviously, the last thing I would want is anyone to be fined or imprisoned for listening to my music. Another feature of uploading my own torrent is that it creates a little legal nesting area on a network otherwise deemed illegal by most governments and RIAA. When someone else uploads a torrent of my music, it is without my approval…on the other end of things, and more importantly, when someone raids an admin’s apartment…no police officer is asking me if I want to press charges.
TF: What happens when people donate?
Benn: If you decide that you like the album, you’ll have the option of donating directly to the artist. If you decide that you’d like a CD, you’ll be able to order it directly from my label. I’ve even hired my mother to run our shipping department since she’s the most obsessive-compulsive-perfectionist office worker that I’ve ever laid eyes on.
Finally, every detail of my album’s content, release, and business is done exactly the way I want it to be done. I hope other artists realize how liberating and profitable it is compared to the distribution system we’ve all become so accustomed to.
TF: Radiohead did really quite well after they offered ‘In Rainbows’ online for free. You’re a few days into this experiment - how is it going for you?
Benn: My donations have a way to go before they match the numbers from CD pre-orders, but I’m still crossing my fingers. In a week or so I plan to release a detailed statistical report. For some reason I really like making pie charts.
TF: I’ve listened to the album - Soundtrack To A Vacant Life - and I really enjoyed it. Could you tell us some more about it?
Benn: It was 2 years in the making, and is conceptually me attempting to write the soundtrack to my own life. Of course this means that it is much more cinematic than electronic, and the songs all connect chronologically. Those who have heard my previous albums can expect this one to be a lot more melodic, tame, and instrumental. Suggested listening is with a decent pair of headphones from start to finish.
TF: I have some, I’ll try that later. Thanks for your time.
Benn Jordan’s blog can be found here.
Previously: The Pirate Bay Fights Danish ISP Block
Next: How a BitTorrent Tracker Owner Hides from the MPAA/RIAA


127 Responses (Add yours or TrackBack)
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 » Show All
I got his album on What. I also bought the FLAC version from his site to support him. It’s crummy that iTunes would openly deny that they can’t do anything about the albums in their music store, but when they release the wrong Heroes episode on there, it’s gone the next day?
Bullllshhhittt.
I’m sorry that this guy is getting screwed by his record label, but that is not the fault of iTunes. The problem seems to be with his label.
If an independent artist puts their music on iTunes through Tunecore, they will receive $0.70 per track sold. If they go through CDBaby, they will receive $0.63.
[quote comment="282379"]I’m sorry that this guy is getting screwed by his record label, but that is not the fault of iTunes. The problem seems to be with his label.[/quote]
A. You probably didn’t read the article completely, because iTunes isn’t paying anyone anything for his albums.
B. You have to pay Tunecore to put the music on iTunes, and this guy is getting $1.00 for every $1.00 sold on his own label.
Props to him. Great album. I opened up my wallet for it.
Yeah.. Good on the guy.. come on folks support this guy when or if you can. He’s been screwed over by a bunch of industry knobs.
Lets show the world artists can reach out to the people directly and don’t need to be ripped off by massive corporations.
I’m going to be d/ling this and donating. This guy deserves it.
burrr: you apparently did not read this article iTunes is selling his music, they won’t acknowledge that they even have his music, yet they then won’t take it down for a year until the gravy train is over and they have made their money off of him, and not giving him his money owed.
“A. You probably didn’t read the article completely, because iTunes isn’t paying anyone anything for his albums.”
It’s not clear from the interview that this is the case. HE is not getting paid, but that does not necessarily mean that iTunes is not paying. It is more likely that whoever iTunes is paying is not paying him or his label.
There are plenty of independent musicians who sell their music on iTunes and get paid for it. This guy is getting screwed by somebody, but it’s not clear that iTunes is the culprit.
“B. You have to pay Tunecore to put the music on iTunes, and this guy is getting $1.00 for every $1.00 sold on his own label.”
You are forgetting about the PayPal fee. He is probably making more like $0.80 on the dollar. Still, better than iTunes, I admit.
Its not exactly hard to make a pay torrent site that gives 100% of sales directly to artists.
Normal MP3s could be free, while you pay for lossless or image files to burn to CD.
Itunes only ripp artists, theres no need for sutch a service to take anything from the sales, atleast not if they were using Bittorrent and ads pay for the site.
Itunes though will continue the old dinosaur ways and so will the music industry.
Im glad yet another artist realized whats going on and trie to do something about it ;)
And they call us “thieves”????
I wish there could be some mechanism embedded into mp3’s whereas Winamp for example could have a Donate to artist button and the monies go directly to the artists fund.
Could be open to security risks, but ideally this would be the best thing to have.
We are.
LOL @ #7, ya no shit hehehe.
This reminds me of Paulo Coelho ,and his famous book “The Alchemist”.
I hope this works out for Benn as much as it did for Paulo. This new business model based upon free distribution over bit torrent is the right way to go!
This will make people excited about buying something they were encouraged to try for free!!
when i fuck women in the ass they say pinch my nipples and when i do they come quickly, why
[quote comment="282411"]burrr: you apparently did not read this article iTunes is selling his music, they won’t acknowledge that they even have his music, yet they then won’t take it down for a year until the gravy train is over and they have made their money off of him, and not giving him his money owed.[/quote]
it sounded to me that the label he was with made the deal with iTunes and put in his contract that he would recieve royalties only off of retail purchases. leaving that label to collect all the money made off of digital downloads.
Funny, I was listening to The Flashbulb when this story popped up in my RSS aggregator.
I guess artists just don’t get paid anymore, this is why music is starting to lack originality and just sucking all around.
I agree that iTunes is not at fault here. This is the case of an evil record label.
I am an Artist that uses TuneCore and I get $0.70 per track sold (thats more than any other place I sell). They don’t even take a cut. I pay upfront a nominal fee for them to deliver my album to online services. That’s fair. Apple takes $0.29 per track. For that I get very stable service and great exposure on one of the biggest music retailers in the world. Apple has to put a lot of cash into iTunes to keep it running smoothly - especially considering how massive the library and user base is now. Thats fair.
Plus, these are businesses. Everything you do as a business must turn a profit.
One last thing, TuneCore messed one of my albums up - it was missing a track. iTunes had to remove the album, then TuneCore re-uploaded it to Apple. It took about 3 months before the whole thing was cleared up - not fast, but not a year. That record label you used to be on is pure BS.
As a small artist, iTunes (and TuneCore) is the best thing that has happened to me. I stay as far away from Record Labels as I can.
That’s just classic! Now that DRM is fading out, the next issue to be addressed is the pricing model — college students and kids aren’t gonna pay $.99 for songs, so why not cut them a rate slightly lower rate, (price discrimination? the movie theatres do it everyday) and start monetizing these kids.
Benn, would love to talk to you about Grooveshark
This interview is sort of … vague on some points. The fellow mentions Sublight Records. Who the hell are they? Are they the record label to whom this guy signed over the rights to his music — and the record label in turn made a deal with iTunes?
‘Cause then calling iTunes a pirate is a smart publicity stunt, except that it’s simple lying. If this fellow wants me to feel sympathy for him, he can start with a little bit of honesty, maybe.
As a programmer, I can tell you for a fact that the story you’ve been fed about it being impossible to remove your record off i-tunes is a blatant lie. I suggest you hire yourself a good lawyer and sue them using that rigged formula they use to make up their losses.
i’d love to fuck a chick that’s as fat as a whale
Something does not add up about this story. Who, specifically, is not allowing the album to be removed?
I know of cases where iTunes has had to make corrections or remove albums and they did so. It just takes a while in some cases.
It looks like the copyright owner of the Flashbulb albums is “Bohnerwachs Tontraeger.” That’s who needs to contact iTunes to get the albums removed.
My suspicion is that “Bohnerwachs Tontraeger” does not want the albums removed from iTunes. Either that, or their digital distributor (IODA) is unwilling to request that the album be removed. I have never dealt with them before, but I would be surprised if this was the case.
Apple really doesn’t care either way. iTunes is an advertisement for iPods.
I hate Apple, iPods, and all of their retarded crap.
fuck APPLE
It’s call a Record Label. Musicians have been getting screwed for years. If this guys believes that iTunes is to blame he is an idiot. Most of the money goes to the labels. Also, look how many people have been “discovered” through iTunes Ads (Fiest and most recently the Macbook Air lady). My take is this guy is trying to get his 15 minutes and ride the Radiohead “give it away free” train. I don’t wish him ill or wish him well either! He just seem arrogant to me.
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 » Show All
Add your response