TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

Record Labels To Pay $45 Million for Pirating Artists’ Music

The major record labels are known for their harsh stance on copyright infringements, which in an ironic turn of events is now costing them millions of dollars. Revealing a double standard when it comes to ‘piracy’, Warner Music, Sony BMG Music, EMI Music and Universal Music now have to pay Canadian artists $45 Million for the illegal use of thousands of tracks on compilation CDs.

It is no secret that the major record labels have a double standard when it comes to copyright. On the one hand they try to put operators of BitTorrent sites in jail and ruin the lives of single mothers and students by demanding hundreds of thousands of dollars in fines, and on the other they sell CDs containing music for which they haven’t always cleared the rights. This happens worldwide and more frequently than one would think.

Over the years the labels have made a habit of using songs from a wide variety of artists for compilation CDs without securing the rights. They simply use the recording and make note of it on “pending list” so they can deal with it later. This has been going on since the 1980s and since then the list of unpaid tracks (or copyright infringements) has grown to 300,000 in Canada alone.

This questionable practice has been the subject of an interesting Canadian class action lawsuit which was started in 2008. A group of artists and composers who grew tired of waiting endlessly for their money filed a lawsuit against four major labels connected to the CRIA, the local equivalent of the RIAA.

Warner Music, Sony BMG Music, EMI Music and Universal Music were sued for the illegal use of thousands of tracks and risked paying damages of up to $6 billion. Today the news broke that the two parties have agreed upon a settlement, where the record labels are required to pay $45 million to settle the copyright infringement claims.

During the case the labels were painfully confronted with their own double standard when it comes to copyright infringement. “The conduct of the defendant record companies is aggravated by their strict and unremitting approach to the enforcement of their copyright interests against consumers,” the artists argued in their initial claim for damages.

Of course, the labels are not so quick to admit their wrongdoing and in their press release the settlement is described as a compromise. “The settlement is a compromise of disputed claims and is not an admission of liability or wrongdoing by the record labels,” it reads.

David Basskin, President and CEO of one of the major Canadian licensing collectives, was nonetheless happy with the outcome. “This agreement with the four major labels resolves all outstanding pending list claims. EMI, Sony, Universal and Warner are ensuring that the net result is more money for songwriters and music publishers. It’s a win for everyone,” he said.

The major issues that led to this dispute are not resolved though. After paying off a small part of their debt the labels can continue to ‘pirate’ artists’ music as usual, using their work and placing the outstanding payments on a pending list for decades. A real solution would require the licensing system to change, and that’s not likely to happen anytime soon.

Related Posts

Previous Post | Next Post

  • hotdog

    LMAO AWESOME IT’S THE CURSE I PUT ON THE RIAA BASTARDS DESERVE IT.

  • Anonymous

    “It’s a win for everyone” Yaaaaay! Go forth our music heroes!

    Lol

  • Lol

    Let the money roll in their direction and they’ll occasionally shit a coin in the direction of the artists if it truly has to happen. “Awww, do we have to?”

    Bribing, I mean “lobbying”, politicians&co to change policies has larger monetary returns than being fair.

  • Juan Angel

    JAJAJAJAJA
    OWNED!

  • Anonymous

    In your face, RIAA!

  • Pingback: Tweets that mention Record Labels To Pay $45 Million for Pirating Artists’ Music | TorrentFreak -- Topsy.com

  • Chemical

    Damnit, should have gone for the 6 Billion high-score. I mean, come on. Seriously.

  • x

    . . . . . One BiG difference . . . . .

    £ $ $ They Copied to make money £ $ £

    WE don’t make money from sharing.

    . . . . . . . . . . .PEOPLE . . . . . . . . . . .
    . . . . . . . .SHARE LIKE FUK . . . . . . . .

    If you could copy and download a cancer drug?

  • skybon

    RIAA got pwned using their own means. ROFL

  • Kirkpad

    …”is not an admission of liability or wrongdoing by the record labels”

    So since there was no precedent set in court, they will continue stealing artists music because they believe they have done nothing wrong.

    I say they should have went through with the case and sued for the $6 billion.

  • aForce

    What goes around comes around. I hope it bit them firmly in the ass xD

    They are the real criminals and criminals belong behind bars…

  • Pingback: www.meneame.net

  • Anonymous

    I wonder if that $45 million will be added to the figure that the industry will say it lost this year due to piracy?

    I am also of the opinion that the artists in question should have gone the distance and not settled. Maybe another group of artists could try the same thing and have the balls not to back down.

    • Anonymous

      “I am also of the opinion that the artists in question should have gone the distance and not settled.”

      They’re Canadian… what else would you have expected?

      :P

  • Pingback: joneame.net

  • hotdog

    Because what it all amounts to is the artist.Not the record label.I seriously hope to here more about this and artist waking up to see what these crooks have been doing.You can ask many artist what they feel about file sharing and 75% will tell you they approve.The rest are puppets.

  • elduka

    as Nelson( The Simpsions) would say, “HA HA!”

  • Lucky Man

    everything’s a joke!! everything comes to money… God don’t create money so by ppl but mess by ppl… money will die someday ;)

  • StevO

    Well, when the artist stands on stage and says ” GO ahead and get our CD, we dont care if you steal it or copy it and give it to friends…JUST GET IT!” To their fans, then they have actually given us permission. And believe me they do say it.

  • Autonomous

    @15 by StevO

    Well, when the artist stands on stage and says “GO ahead and get our CD, we dont care if you steal it or copy it and give it to friends…JUST GET IT!” To their fans, then they have actually given us permission. And believe me they do say it.

    Sadly though, they are not usually theirs to give when they’ve sold the rights to Big Media under some tortuous contract which takes away the copyright ownership.

    Just like when the Beatles copyrights were sold and the original authors were outbid by Michael Jackson.

  • Johnny

    And this is of course real piracy: taking other people’s work and reselling it for profit.

  • chaos

    ah I was already wondering what happened to this case – have been thinking about it ever since you wrote about it for the first time.

    was expecting that the CRIA bribed the hell out of whoever was responsible for it and that it was dropped. But seems I was wrong :)

    Only sad thing is that they didn’t get the maximum fines – I mean, double standard AND real commercial piracy – how much worse can it get?

    $45 Million for 300000 songs? Thats a lame 150$ per song for a really
    bad infringement. I mean, come on, “sharing pirates” got waaaay higher fines (per song) imposed on them than these suckers.

  • Pingback: Anonymous

  • Anonymous was here

    300,000 artists prolly 4-5 songs each
    1.5million songs penalty for commercial piracy
    45 million, or 30$ a song. NICE precident…..

  • Anonymous was here

    btw Canadian law actually states that per commercial infringement it is a fine of 20,000 dollars
    SO is the govt going to levy a 20,000 times ( 300,000 ?) fine on hte record labels?——6 billion dollars

  • Anonymous was here

    so,i putting stuff on a pending list and will pay 150$ each item 30 years form now…..wink wink nudge nudge.

  • Anonymous was here

    i should be dead in about 29 years 364 days

  • Violated

    It seems wrong to label this as piracy when your usual file sharing pirates did not do it for profit.

    So counterfeiting and copyright fraud would be more accurate.

    Politicians should pay attention to the two-faced scum they are trying to protect.

    Still as Johnny said above one would expect the more traditional pirate to sell their stolen booty for profit.

    This is why it is more accurate to call us the file shares which makes them the real pirates.

  • your mum

    PWNT

  • Anonymous

    This made my day.

  • (-_-)-(-_-)

    “Ouch”

  • PlayBoyMan

    Karma is quite the B***h, isn’t it ? ^_^

  • Quartz

    To settle for a paltry sum as 45 million is basically to weaken any future claims of this sort after all if the artists dont have the courage of their convictions and belief in their 6 billion claim why should anyone else ?

    Sellout settlement really, big loss for the artist and business as usual for the fat cat middlemen.

  • Anonymous

    Well by this logic, I have about 10,000 songs on my computer I have put on my “pending paying royalties” list.

    Fuck you Warner Music, Sony BMG Music, EMI Music and Universal Music

  • Anonymous

    Well by this logic, I have about 10,000 songs on my computer I have put on my “pending paying royalties” list.

    F##k you Warner Music, Sony BMG Music, EMI Music and Universal Music

  • Bum

    Wait a second… Thomas was fined $1.92 million for 24 songs

    So 300,000 that should be $1.92million/24 * 300,000 = $24 BILLION!!!

  • SSG

    Ah, what goes around..

  • uJonesing

    Hahaha!

  • Rechar

    So wait, these bloodsuckers who happily sought $150,000 per song when they sue individuals for non-profit copyright violations get away with paying $150 per song for exploiting the artist for profit?

  • Ima Wanker

    Only 45 million? WTF! They should have been fined 45 billion and sent to prison.

  • 9

    Really.. This COULD have been a big victory if the artists would not have settled for $45,000,000.. To the RIAA that is pocket change..

    After ALL this time of the RIAA saying that pirating is worse than satan, they are like “OOPS, umm.. maybe we pirated a little bit too.. >_> But PLEASE don’t be too harsh on us..”

    This should have went further and they should have had to pay like $6,000,000,000 instead of just $45,000,000.. But I think they waved the $45m in the air and said “Lookie at all this money!” because to normal people that is a lot of money, so the defendants dumbly settled for like pocket change pretty much..
    This is not going to hurt the RIAA at all.. In the end they are laughing and saying “haha, money really CAN fix every thing! Even when we pirate stuff..”

    Also, any one else that ends up in court battle over piracy should be able to say “Well, I have all of the albums I pirated on a list.. I was going to go out and buy them some time in the future..”
    Or does the RIAA have more liberties than the normal working man because they are a giant company?.. Even after settling the RIAA said they did nothing wrong..

    PLEASE vote with your wallet and don’t give your money to evil corporations any longer..

  • Toasty

    Hah! Take a bite of your own medicine, you media bastards!

  • roflcopter

    KARMA IS A BITCH!

  • James

    So the crooks had to pay.

  • Lemme Jones

    LOL, you have to admit thats pretty funyn dude. Seriously.

  • Lolzors

    Hmmm, I’m no lawyer so I’m unsure but…
    Wouldn’t we prefer a more lenient settlement? I dunno, it’s still lenient, compared to non-commercial lawsuits, but I’d rather see this shit go away, meh, well see

  • DJDANKVT

    LOL

  • Anonymous

    So can this be set as a precedent for future filesharers to pay $150 per song?

  • Anonymous

    Oh… and to settle the $150 in 30 years

  • xx

    The $45 million settlement might seem high, but lets not forget that this covers a period of a quarter-century during which the record companies freely pirated many millions of copies of artists’ songs *FOR PROFIT*

    So when the record companies get caught pirating songs, their penalty amounts to a fraction of a dollar per act of copyright infringement (or about what they would owe in royalties anyway) but when a music fan like Jammie Thomas does it, the penalty is $80 thousand per infringement.

    Does anyone think that this million-to-one ratio is somehow fair?

  • lulz

    This is not lulz. We should print this whole page and spam mail it to every politician we can think of. It’s just totally out of proportion.

  • yep

    @#3

    well said.

  • Talorthain

    Thats peanuts. Shouldnt the same level of compensation per track be applied, as they have for the various people who dont have any ability to pay.

    If it was a true win and if it was fair, it would have been 45 billion and then chased for every penny, to make an example and destroy their lives to show others piracy is not right!!

    If memory searves me right didnt one person get fined a few million for 25 tracks?

  • Anonymous

    A million is a thousandth of a BILLION

  • john smith

    The world’s best-selling music artists lists artists with claims of 50 million or more record sales in multiple third-party reliable sources.
    ……………..
    Mobile Deals

  • JustMe

    No trolls here? How come?

  • NoTownKasper

    Thanks for selling us out ya Canadian ‘artists’…instead of ‘making an example out of them’ as they would us, you let them slide with less in fines than the last Justin Beiber video cost…

    …Brilliant!

  • Brandon

    Riaa Such A-holes. They won’t even admit to piracy. Cop out and wave around 45 million to shut the artist up. Meanwhile they go Right back to pirating their stuff like nothing happened…. I hope they are and should be put out of busines Forever…

  • mshenrick

    i agree with most of the article, except the ‘ruing lives of single mothers’ that is justice, the single mother ruined her own life by pirating stuff.

    YOU have double standards

    • Anti Troll

      Go run to mommy you TROLL!!

  • hmmm

    Jurisprudence anyone?

  • NoTownKasper

    @54

    Bugger off, would ya? The single mother shouldn’t have to pay more for one CD of music than it cost for that child’s dinners for a week. Refusing to be robbed is far different from theft.

  • Joe Public

    I think I will start a new business Joe Public records … First release artists could be something like.

    The Beatles
    Lady Gaga
    Katy Perry
    Elvis Presley
    P!nk
    ABBA
    The Police
    Madonna
    Lilly Allen
    Led Zeppelin
    KISS
    Queen

    Anyway I know much of the list is Junk (and I would never listen to it) but the run down is better than most compilations I have seen. Figure I could sell a few CD’s with such a run down an none of the company’s could do anything so long as I have a pending list.

    I could also download whatever I want on the grounds of it being used in future compilations … Any conviction would set a president the music company’s would not want so they may even defend me :-)

    So how many more of you will be working on “Compilation CD’s” from now on

    Sincerely yours

    Joe Public

  • The Doctor

    So, now there should be appeals around the world for over priced judgements and they should be revised to the top four studios own calculations of what copyright infringment is actually worth..

    $45M / 300k songs = $150 per track

    So Whats his face’s $1.92M judgement for 24 songs should be reduced to $3,600.

    Sure it is not an actual court victory setting proven liability, but I doubt that will stop any decent lawyer from being able to defend the stupid amounts in the 10′s to 100′s of thousands per track claimed by the major studios. Although those cases have fallen away as a means of enforcement.

    In fact I think the artists were stupid to settle for $45M for almost over a quarter of a centry of damages.

    The RIAA and their cronies are such HYPOCRITES!!!

  • Anonymous

    @57 Joe Public

    I would love “”the balls”" to actually do your idea.

    We all know profiting from copying others work is wrong.

    But if we have a pending list…

    done.. just pay when we win the lottery.

  • ANON

    http://anonymousfilesharing.blogspot.com/

    Try the anonymous file sharing with StealthNet

    FREE AND OPEN SOURCE

  • angryfinland

    Have already started transferring collection of 8000 songs onto compilation hard drives and put them all on my pending list. Guess thats me covered for the next 30 years.

    Typical two faced double standards that we expect from the entertainment industry!

  • Pingback: Las grandes discográficas mundiales pagarán indemnizaciones para no verse condenadas por piratas | MuyComputerPRO

  • Pingback: Record Labels To Pay $45 Million for Pirating Artists’ Music | Systema

  • Pingback: Record Labels To Pay For Copyright Infringement | JetLib News

  • Pingback: Android OS news » Record Labels To Pay For Copyright Infringement

  • Ninja

    @ 11 Jan 11, 2011 at 00:54 by Anonymous: you bet it will.

    Ah, hypocrisy at it’s finest. That’s a good argument to use in a possible lawsuit from MAFIAA: “You illegally sold music and yet you are accusing me of sharing it for NO profit with my FRIENDS? Srsly?”

    Ah, it’s a better day when you read that MAFIAA got it in the face ;)

  • Pingback: Netzwelt-Ticker: Weg für Massenklage gegen Musiklabels frei | Flash News

  • johnson

    considering the ‘fines tenenbaum and thomas-rasset got, this is a pittance. considering the ‘industries’ were doing this for years, it is a pittance. considering they were using multiple tracks, it is a pittance. considering they were using multiple artists, it is a pittance. considering they were doing it for profit, it is a pittance. considering they were definitely depriving artists of money, it is a pittance. considering they have spent more on lobbying (bribing politicians), it is a pittance. considering they got caught, priceless!!!

  • Drag0nflamez

    Finally, the tables have turned.

  • Pingback: Skivbolag får betala 45 miljoner dollar för piratad musik | iPortal

  • SL

    It should be more than all the money in world, ~$145k per song per cd.

  • plgmn

    #54 mshenrick

    But what about the record labels? They were only fined $45 million. I don’t their lives ruined.

  • Whatever

    Basically it is better to SELL pirate copies than to share. For a mere $150 you can sell 1000′s of copies over 30 years of any song included. However giving things away or sharing is so bad that heavy fines including jailtime are needed. Actually, its already reality where stealing a physical cd or selling copies is much less severly punished.

    On the basis of a program i saw yesterday: It seems the nature of humans and higher level animals to share. Applying this to the music industry, the MAFIAA trolls and maybe even the US it means that those people are a mistake of nature.

    My pending list:
    DIR /s music “greater than sign” pending.txt

    @51 neocon troll blackout day?

  • plgmn

    If I’m the judge I would raise the fine to $0.45 Trillion

  • Pingback: Skivbolag får betala 45 miljoner dollar för piratad musik | Webbfeber

  • Charles B

    Hey those companies operate world wide don’t they? USA, Canada, South America, UK, etc., etc., etc. Seriously how many artists, how many songs, how many compilations on a GLOBAL SCALE??? …AND for PROFIT!!!

    Makes me so mad, I could just BLOW UP!

  • Zan

    Stunned.

    Bought a few compilations over the years.

    Does this mean I can get arrested for handling stolen goods now?

  • JD

    You guys they have this money set aside to do this. They new what you were doing is wrong. They just want to get rid of the middle class is all. The rich want to be richer and want YOU homeless. There is no in between. They want to laugh at you while they drive by when you are picking the garbage.

  • Anonymous

    haha Joe public records i like that :)well we all politicians>big companys>law firms etc etc are ALL corrupt. SADLY we are just the cattle. It goes round & round and round we are just the sh!t under the shoe

  • Anonymous

    @70

    No. But we can sue them for selling us stolen goods for the past 30 years!

  • anon

    hah, so songwriters and artists FINALLY get some money too

  • Jeff

    Serves them right, though I would think the artists who were the plaintiffs in this suit should ask for more, as much as the statutory maximum, which comes to $6 billion (CA dollars of course).

    There is clearly hypocrisy in the Big 4 music labels. When filesharers infringe with no profits from such, it is called piracy. Yet the labels do this, and they profit from it. So who are the real pirates now, trolls and MAFIAA shills?

    Not that I expect any of the usual ones to chime in here. They are always curiously silent when the shoe is on the other foot, so to speak.

  • Glad

    Epic fail.
    $45 million is nothing. $45 million – lawyer fees is less than nothing.
    Feels like another victory for big labels. They should have been punished much more severely. Without silly settlement.
    Feels like big label conspiracy to lower financial and reputational damages.
    DAMN!

  • Pingback: Tuesday: New Knockoff Makes it Tough to Keep Your Pants On! | Knockoff Report

  • Lolzors

    No1 should be surpsrised here, in the words of the exploited: ‘there’s a law for the rich, and a law for tge people like you and me’

    Tiered justice and hypocrisy are just another Monday. Fortunately, YOU can pirate, and never buy shit, and put these criminal middlemen in the street where they belong

  • Burnout

    Money Green , Or Proletarian Grey , Can Buy a Whole God Damn Government Today …

    Phuck The Lobbyist And The Big Corporations Where They Came From …

  • Anonymous

    They won’t get rid of piracy because they apparently can’t do without it either.

  • Pingback: RapidShare: We’re Dedicated To Fighting Online Infringement | PornDL News

  • Pingback: To Err Is Human, To Arr Is Pirate

  • BLOODstorm

    thats fkn awesome, but i fear this settlement will make it easier for the music labels to go after consumers by using themselves as a model of “paying their bill”.

  • BLOODstorm

    Not to mention that they will now have to make up for the loss of $45million somewhere.

  • Me

    So if I get caught with a whole bunch of copyrighted stuff on my computer, it is ok for me to say that I am going to pay for them but the payment is on my “pending list”?

  • Pingback: RapidShare: We’re Dedicated To Fighting Online Infringement

  • Pingback: Ever feel bad when pirating music?

  • kd

    If the labels are held to the same standard of up to 250,000 dollars per track aren’t we talking about 75 billion dollars? 250000*300000

  • kd

    What they paid comes to $150 per track. If Tonia Anderson got the same deal then she would pay $4500 not north of a million.

  • Bubo

    What happens when someone pirates a compilation album which is on the records companies ‘pending approval’ list. Who sues?

  • Bubanee

    Well, well, well.. they have a go at people in the P2P community when they are being just as sly..
    lol, at Joe Public Records, are you looking for a talent scout or a music provider. we’ll be right, the big boys are doing it… lol

  • Anonamoose

    So now we have the answer, if the record industry takes you to court trying to claim you’ve somehow cost them millions of dollars….just tell them they can have $10 and walk away.

    Yeah I don’t see it working…one way bastard street.

  • Anonymous

    Folks are forgetting when they do the math, the lawyers are probably going to get most of the award. The artists will probably get little of it.

  • Brian

    @11 – “I wonder if that $45 million will be added to the figure that the industry will say it lost this year due to piracy?”

    That shit is hilarious!

  • neb

    Bravo

  • Anonymous

    No, this is terrible.

    Since they’re settling out of court, this doesn’t set a legal precedent. The RIAA will continue to do whatever they want with whoever’s music they want. In the eyes of the law, they’re still a righteous entity. Sure, the people in this class-action lawsuit got 45$ mil, but that isn’t anything to the **AA. A court decision is monumental. A settlement? Sad.

  • Doink

    Canada
    the true north STRONG and FREE.

  • neo bait

    neocon what a pussy you are! Why not get your timid ass over here? Yohoo…

  • neo bait

    It doesn’t sounds like you… cus I can’t hear hooo…

  • henry

    Why only 45 million
    they should have to pay the same as every one else
    theyre getting fined less just because theyre a big corporation

  • Johnny

    $45m out of $6b of infringements? This wasn’t a fucking win, you idiots. The labels just buttfucked everyone again.

  • what you sow

    As a Canadian artist, I get a shameful thrill seeing former major label A&R people in their new demeaning jobs – Tuesday Night DJ, (unemployed) “consultant”, etc.. This article made me decide to NEVER buy a major/major-affiliated product EVER again.

  • recordexec

    THE ARTIST DIDNT WIN ANYTHING IN THIS TRIAL YOU FOOLS

    I would just like to point out that the original estimate was 50million, so a profit of 2.5M was actually made. This is not an unusual tactic, and is actually quite common.

    Basically, the artist denies the record company their song. The record company says fuck you. Uses the song, and is forced to pay the artist what it wanted to pay them at the beginning, but after fighting the artist in court for a year…so they basically got to earn interest on the artists earnings…while the artist gets to go fuck themselves… this is not a good thing…just to make that clear…this is not a special occurrence of this either…

  • neo styles

    hey tf why did you delete my post?

  • Pingback: Anonymous

  • urdumb

    you people do realize this happened in Canada (Canadian Recording Industry Association) and is no way connected to the Recording Industy Association of America (RIAA). yeah, way to jump on that bandwagon guys!

  • complete

    and utter bull…. its just a cover up as they make a 2nd attempt to bribe the Spanish parliament.. Again.

  • Anon

    $45 million? That’s bearly enough to cover teh artist’s cup of coffee (based on the extortionate amount these companies demand from us).

    The artists should not have settled, they should have taken this to the end and like them demand the $6 billion, cos you know if the record company they would have!

  • Lemme Jones

    Wow that sure is a lot of money dude.

    total-privacy.edu.tc

  • Pingback: Piratería « Cosas que [me] Importan

  • witness

    Greed is not some fancy word for minting, greed is crooked behaviour. To limit greed, fear is created at the very moment of greed otherwise, this crook has no limits. Fear, therefore, is exposure of greed. All seemingly mind-boggling and convoluted but in reality, it is very simple. Greed is crooked behaviour. As such, any entity which exists on the platform of greed-fear is a moral criminal if not a judicial one too. Greed works on the assumption that there is no higher authority to oversee its excessess and fear works on the belief that there is no benevolence. The joke about these greedy-cum-fearful nuts-cum-screws is that although they believe that existence is what and how you’d get away with murder much like gangsters and the “privileged”, their immorality ensures that they will have a life of ups and downs together with its associated illnesses. To “enjoy” for the next round of antagonism. To exists without real peace and real satisfaction with indifference and heartlessness as their reward.

  • Pingback: notisbod.com

  • yawn

    @100
    “you people do realize this happened in Canada (Canadian Recording Industry Association) and is no way connected to the Recording Industy Association of America (RIAA). yeah, way to jump on that bandwagon guys!”

    So is a French pirate different from that of a British. But they ain’t not the same in their phucking opinion

  • Virgil

    The record companies have been stealing from artists for as long as there have been record companies. A standard contract for a first-time artist is akin to slavery in any industry other than the music industry.

    If you are a recording artist you have to realize that those companies need you, not the other way around. Without you, they have no product to sell. Without you they have no talent. You as an artist no longer need the middle man. Today’s technology allows you to record your own projects, promote yourself through online services, (some for free, like YouTube) and distribute your music through online music services like TuneCore.

    Without artists the old music industry will wither and die, but the new industry where your music’s profits are your profits, and nobody is tying up your releases in corporate doublespeak, bureaucratic red tape, and just plain lies will thrive and prosper.

    • Some person

      If the artist abandons the record company, they’ll always just hire a no-talent hussy from nowhere land and autotune the shiz out of her :D

  • Beermatman

    I always wonder about “file sharing”. What if tomorrow morning someone walked into a factory and wanted to do the job for free. Would the employee be as amenable as they expect the company to be… Um I wonder?
    Beermatman
    http://www.beermatsadvertising.com

  • Josh

    This is a huge loss for the music artist community. Looking at that settlement, it’s pretty damn clear that the record companies would have had to pay significantly more, and go through a significantly more damaging legal fight, had the actual case gone to trial. These bastards paid a mere $150 per infringement, something that would never be acceptable to an RIAA/CRIA prosecution team going after a copyright violator.

  • No one

    @54,

    If I buy a CD and share it with my single mom friend, its mine to do so. I’ll shit on the CD and burn it if I feel like. Its not piracy just because they say it is. only in todays world could it be wrong to share!

  • Gringoyle

    @54,

    If I buy a CD and share it with my single mom friend, its mine to do so. I’ll shit on the CD and burn it if I feel like. Its not piracy just because they say it is. only in todays world could it be wrong to share!

  • Big Goat Baby

    @54,

    If I buy a CD and share it with my single mom friend, its mine to do so. I’ll shit on the CD and burn it if I feel like. Its not piracy just because they say it is. only in todays world could it be wrong to share!

  • A musician

    If it’s not an acceptance of responsibility don’t accept! Take them to court until they double their offer. 45 mil between 300’000 or so songs is about 150 a song. The woman in this link (http://new.music.yahoo.com/blogs/amplifier/148/minnesota-mom-hit-with-15-million-fine-for-downloading-24-songs/) has been sued for $62,500 per song. Even with the exchange rate these artists are being ripped off. When we infringe on copyright we risk a fine higher than the cost of raising a child to adult hood. For the same deal they will be paying the cost of a used Civic. If record companies are allowed to treat artists and consumers this way, what will happen to the music?

  • Pingback: Record Labels Sued for Pirating Music! - G35Driver

  • Canadian

    yay, our legal system is still partially working :)

  • Pingback: Record Labels To Pay $45 Million for Pirating Artists’ Music : Music & Mischief Media Group – www.musicandmischief.com

  • Anonymous

    Music industry is rotten to the core! With piracy the scum labels get what they deserve. Death to all them!

  • Anonymous

    All you stupid pirates have been doing it wrong. You were supposed to make a pending list!

  • Bill the Cat

    “The settlement is a compromise of disputed claims and is not an admission of liability or wrongdoing by the record labels.”

    BULLSHIT!!!

  • Angry Voter

    They should be charged under the RICO act and anti-monopoly laws.

    The RIAA members are a cartel and their primary means of business is such.

    They should do prison time.

    Lawmakers that took contributions from them should also be audited and investigated.

  • Pascal Gloor

    Some of you raised concerns about politicians doing nothing. This is wrong, there is a party, present in more than 40 countries defending your opinion! We are the pirate parties! Want to do something? Check with your national pirate party and look how you can help! If can be by giving some time, giving some money or just showing your support in the way you can (sharing information on facebook, article comments, blogs, etc..).

    Pirate parties from around the world need YOU to help them, do the step and join a party!

    Cheers fellow sharing community!
    Pascal Gloor
    Vice-president of Pirate Party Switzerland

    PS: Here’s a list of parties http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pirate_Parties_International

  • Pingback: ryanfiend - Record Labels To Pay $45 Million for Pirating Artists Music

  • Anonymous

    MAFIAA GOT PWNED

  • Pingback: 3 Count: A Fairey Settlement

  • JD

    Ernesto misses that “It also establishes a new mechanism to help ensure that artists are paid more promptly.”

    See Mike Geist’s commentary on this at:
    http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/5563/125/

  • Pingback: Un Comité de Sabios de la UE da la razón a la sociedad civil española « El Blog d'en Jaume Satorra

  • Pingback: mikedev80 - Record Labels To Pay $45 Million for Pirating Artists Music

  • Pingback: Engagements and Accolades Jan 8-15 » Blog | NetShelter Technology Media

  • bob

    I hope the lawyers share a few pennies with the artists whose work was stolen. Between the labels and the lawyers the artists are lucky to be able to buy a cup of coffee from starbucks…I post more of my feeling on the blog on my site.

    http://afloridabeachweddings.com/

    I wish it was 6 billion…for the music artists and not this pittance offered.

  • billybob

    what is good for the goose…

  • Raphael

    Artist just need to stop using the RIAA and other thug brokers/firms and just open and use their own label, set their own prices and gain profit from performances. loyalist will pay for CD, mainstream will opt and pirates will only listen to you song for a week. music was always about performance not profit by copy.

  • v1c Guevara

    Music is for everyone!

    It should not be controlled by these CROCS!

    Cheers to all our music Heroes!!!

  • Pingback: Tweets that mention Record Labels To Pay $45 Million for Pirating Artists’ Music | TorrentFreak -- Topsy.com

  • Pingback: Disqueras pagarán 45 millones de dólares por “piratear” música de artistas canadienses - FayerWayer

  • Pingback: Disqueras pagarán 45 millones de dólares por “piratear” música de artistas canadienses | Posteca

  • Pingback: El burro Hablando de Oreja, Grandes disqueras pagarán US$45 millones por “piratear” música de artistas canadienses « La Voz del que Ve

  • Pingback: Grandes disqueras pagarán US$45 millones por “piratear” música de artistas canadienses « BN

  • phuc RIAA

    this is a bit like shitting into the mouth of a dead perp who used to sexually abuse you when you were just 7 years old and continued to pimp you through most of your teen and young adult life until you were strong enough to do shit on your own.

    the motherfuckers are paying what they can but it won’t mean much to all the trouble you’ve seen and all the money and opportunities you’ve lost.

    this shit doesn’t mean a thing except that the old man is dead and needs to be forgotten, except of course to shit…in the mouth.

  • Pingback: Grandes disqueras pagarán US$45 millones por “piratear” música de artistas canadienses

  • Pingback: Record Companies Busted In Piracy Case « Superb Antenna

  • TaCoooooooooooo JohnSoN

    . . . . . One BiG difference . . . . .

    £ $ $ They Copied to make money £ $ £

    WE don’t make money from sharing.

    . . . . . . . . . . .PEOPLE . . . . . . . . . . .
    . . . . . . . .SHARE LIKE FUK . . . . . . . .

    If you could copy and download a cancer drug?

  • rob8urcakes

    Raphael @123 and Virgil @106 are IMHO absolutely spot-on in finding a decent, fair and reasonable solution to all this aggression from the MAFIAA. Here’s what we should do and why -

    106 Jan 12, 2011 at 18:40 by Virgil
    The record companies have been stealing from artists for as long as there have been record companies. A standard contract for a first-time artist is akin to slavery in any industry other than the music industry.

    If you are a recording artist you have to realize that those companies need you, not the other way around. Without you, they have no product to sell. Without you they have no talent. You as an artist no longer need the middle man. Today’s technology allows you to record your own projects, promote yourself through online services, (some for free, like YouTube) and distribute your music through online music services like TuneCore.

    Without artists the old music industry will wither and die, but the new industry where your music’s profits are your profits, and nobody is tying up your releases in corporate doublespeak, bureaucratic red tape, and just plain lies will thrive and prosper.

    Thanks VIrgil, and Raphael too of course. You guys are the best.

  • Pingback: General Global Week in Review 17 January 2011 from IP Think Tank

  • chris franko

    are you kidding me!!!!!! 6 billion dollars and u settle for 45 million. you basicly said, oh yea, its ok to fuck me in the ass, as long as you spit on it once.

    • ceejay@trashfactory.de

      thats exactly what i was thinking. this is not a win against, but again for the music mafia. this should have been fought until the very end, like they do with single moms and teenagers.

  • dugg simpson

    there are a lot of things wrong with this settlement…it doesn’t make a whole lot of sense.

    check the questions at the end of this blog post:

  • LOL

    Someone get this up on CNET. I’d love to see the RIAA’s allies try to justify this. Somehow i don’t think i’m gonna hear about this in the mainstream media

  • 0ffh

    Bah, it’s below 1% of the maximal claim! I’d have called 10% a compromise, but this is pathetic! Probably more attractive for the claimants to get a crumb of the cake right now than fight for another decade in the uncertain hope to get a whole slice of it.

  • Pingback: $45 Million for Pirating Music, and why I’m happy about it | facepalm 2.0

  • Pingback: Engagement and Accolades Jan 14-21 » Blog | NetShelter Technology Media

  • Pingback: Music Industrie und der Klagenwahnsinn: Diesmal anders herum! | A-M Radio

  • RIAAsux

    About time the RIAA got a taste of their own medicine. Phecking bastards.

  • Pingback: hamels.be » Blog Archive » What goes around, comes around

  • ANTO32

    They totally deserve it.

  • mdean707@hotmail.com

    Slave For Truth by Michael Dean Hajas

    Sony,BMG, Eric Lavine, Bruce Scavuzzo, Zomba, Britney Spears, Robert John Mutt Lange, Matt Haywood, and HHO Publishing need to come to grips with the facts. Your life stogie choices depend on your abilities to carry on in the music business as honorable gentlemen and ladies. You performed a great travesty beyond your collective comprehension, and that is why Karma is knocking on your doors. Your respective corporations and affiliate members will continue to witness the decline in monetary reward, until you have turned the tables with a full admission and recompense to the artists that you so depend on. Shame on you and your leaders, especially Howard Stringer, you are suppose to represent the interests of the parent company. They will have no tolerance for your disgrace.

    You are all cowards, and shall be deal with, as common thieves.

    Michael Dean Hajas
    Mdean707@hotmail.com

  • Pingback: News - Google censors BitTorrent and more from its instant search service - HEXUS.community discussion forums

  • BTGuard - BitTorrent Anonymously

NewsBits

Even more news...

  • The Pirate Bay Isn’t Down Completely, Just Having a Few Issues

    Twitter and Facebook, not to mention the TorrentFreak inbox, are currently alive with complaints that The...

  • Pirate Bay Founder Gottfrid Svartholm on Freedom of Speech

    Freedom of speech is a highly valued commodity, but should people be allowed to say whatever...

  • Blu-ray Anti-Piracy Tech Stops Discs and Promotes Purchases

    An anti-piracy system present in all official Blu-ray players since 2012 has received a fresh update...

  • Foxtel Breeds Pirates by Locking Up Game of Thrones

    One of the main reasons why people turn to piracy is the lack of legal alternatives....

  • UK Student Admits Breaching Sony Copyrights With Leak of PS3 SDK

    Last year an Internet user known as El Nomeo leaked version 3.70 of Sony’s Playstation3 SDK...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

PopularArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.