TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

Richard Stallman Urges Rejection of Anti-Piracy Web Blocking

Under Italian government legislation, telecommunications agency AGCOM will have to take responsibility for dealing with Internet content deemed illicit by entertainment companies. To that end, AGCOM is about to give itself the power to remove content and block websites without the need for any legal process. According to free software guru Richard Stallman, Italians should use “what’s left of their democracy” to oppose such measures.

Italy is no stranger to censoring sites deemed offensive by the entertainment industries. In the summer of 2008 The Pirate Bay was blocked nationwide following a court order, a decision the site successfully appealed at the The Court of Bergamo.

That victory was short-lived. The Supreme Court subsequently decided that sites such as The Pirate Bay can indeed be blocked on the basis they are engaging in illegal behavior. This decision opened up fresh action against another torrent site, BTjunkie. The public prosecutor described BTJunkie as one of the most prominent havens for pirated media and in April a court ordered all Italian ISPs to block the site.

But of course, legal action takes time and as was shown in the first ruling against The Pirate Bay, sometimes a positive outcome for copyright holders can transform into periods of concern. To avoid such distractions in the future, the Italian government and its telecoms agency have a cunning plan.

Under recent government legislation telecommunications agency AGCOM is now required to adopt measures to deal with sites and content deemed illicit by the entertainment industries. AGCOM want to make that particular job as simple as possible by awarding themselves the most powerful tool available – the ability to remove content and block websites without a single court, judge or legal process getting in the way.

AGCOM will be able to take offending sites and content offline within 48 hours. Sites affected by the measures will have 5 days to lodge an appeal.

Tomorrow, July 6th, AGCOM will vote on the resolution which will grant the agency the controversial powers detailed above. It will do so in the face of intense opposition from many in the Internet community, who see the lack of judicial oversight as a sign that abuses of power and unwarranted censorship will follow. Among the dissenters is free software guru Richard Stallman.

“I believe that this an attempt by copyright owners to skip the legal system to attack sites and services that they consider a threat to their interests,” says Stallman in an interview with Italy’s Espresso.

Stallman

“The new system, directed by AGCOM rather than by a court with due process, will accelerate decisions against alleged illegal internet content: this is why the copyright industry wants it. But, being a short and quick way, it will probably trample the rights of users.”

Stallman goes on to state that dissenting voices have been wrongfully silenced in the past following spurious claims of copyright infringement, and that under AGCOM’s proposals collateral damage is inevitable.

“I do not think it is possible to avoid censorship against innocent sites. But even if it were possible, it would be wrong. Why would we hinder users who want to share content?”

But does Stallman believe the right to share trumps the rights of the entertainment industries?

“I reject the term ‘copyright protection’ associated with what the industry is doing now,” Stallman explains.

“Copyright should serve to protect the art and artists. The current system, however, is only in the interests of publishers and delivers only crumbs to almost all of the artists. I propose a system to fund artists directly, based on their popularity, with taxes to give fair compensation [such as from a blank media levy].”

Various campaigns are underway to protest AGCOM’s proposals. The activists of Anonymous are taking the usual direct action by way of ‘Operation Italian Internet Freedom’ and a DDoS on the currently unavailable AGCOM website.

Related Posts

Previous Post | Next Post

  • Jake9

    I love that guy.

    • Anonymous

      When they write our histories in a few centuries, the kind we read about now with names like Borgias, Da Vinci, Galileo and Newton in them?

      I reckon Stallman will rate. He’s a righteous dude.

      • Zzzz

        Proving you know little to nothing about the achievements of Da Vinci, Galileo and Newton or the infamy of the Borgias.

        • Hey Paps

          You think being famous on the internet will be less of a deal in the future? “infamy” is not what you grew up with anymore.

  • Mike

    I love this guy also!

    Stallman is 100% correct. He could have been a billionaire and he choose to enrich humanity instead of enriching himself. He was a true father of computing and often is overlooked alongside the billionaires. I would put this guy up there as one of the best programmers of his generation.

    Thank you Mr. Stallman sensible comments once again!

  • Anon

    Trust the Italians to find a way round that pesky legal process thingy :rolleyes:

    God bless Mr Stallman and God bless Anonymous… KEEP FIRING !!!

  • SomeAsian

    I liked it better back in the day when shadow corporations were slightly influencing legislation through well earned connections in government and media. At least it was cool then. Now it’s like they aren’t even trying to fucking hide it anymore!

    P.S. That guy is cool, but he looks like a hobo.

    • Anonymous

      For a moment, I thought it was a pic of Alan Moore. He too has that hobo look. But Alan Moore has that “I might be deranged, I might not. Are you willing to risk your life trying to find out?” look about him. Because he’s hardcore like that. They both have their principles though, which is admirable in this day and age. Certainly both are worthy of respect.

    • Anonymous

      For a moment, I thought it was a pic of Alan Moore. He too has that hobo look. But Alan Moore has that “I might be deranged, I might not. Are you willing to risk your life trying to find out?” look about him. Because he’s hardcore like that. They both have their principles though, which is admirable in this day and age. Certainly both are worthy of respect.

    • muumi

      P.S. That guy is cool, but he looks like a hobo. (cool man he is.)

      Mafia likes easy targets and italian agcom is also easy prey for anonymus, well imma chargin mah lazer and ROFL again.

  • wwwwwwwwww

    INSTALL GENTOO

    • Anonymous

      INSTALL /G/ENTOO

      Fix’d

    • Anonymous

      Lol. Stallman would prefer you installed a fully “free” operating system:
      http://www.gnu.org/distros/free-distros.html

      I’d recommend Trisquel, if you’re a die hard GNU enthusiast.

      • Mike

        Indeed

  • http://twitter.com/icanhazsake Ninja

    Italian Government has been doing it wrong for a while now. At least they did it right in the Ruby case, she’s a babe ;D

  • Anonymous

    Wut? Firing? Did the fun start without me again…

  • Guest

    It won’t take long before other industries use these new found powers to block other types of site who go against their best interests. For example, I could see General Motors petitioning its government to block the Toyota website or Airbus asking to have the Boeing site blocked in Europe, Budweiser vs. Heineken, the madness is just starting!

    They are opening a Pandora’s box which will never close. It is most likely kill the internet as we know it today forcing everyone to take refuge in one of the numerous darknets like Freenet or Tor.

    “The internet is dead, long live the Darknets!”

    • http://twitter.com/icanhazsake Ninja

      I think it’d not be as straightforward like that. It’s more like innocent hip hop blogs would be censored because they allow a good (and at times free) source of music to flourish. Youtube wouldn’t be blocked because the public reaction would be too negative but they would use it as bargain coin against Google to try to make the search giant do whatever they wanted.

      Pandora Box sounds so sweet when you think about it…

    • Momo

      You know all those patent disputes in the smartphone industry? I bet they’ll start asking for each other’s sites to be blocked based on accusations. Lots of fun to be had there.

      • Guest

        Indeed, just like reported in TF, Artists are even suing CNET for distributing free P2P software… With exaggeration one could even conceive that it would be possible to sue the power companies for providing the electricity necessary to permit copyright infringements.

        Don’t laugh, we have already seen weirder lawsuits…

  • http://twitter.com/ezee ezee

    I respect Stallman, his views and his intelligence BUT

    the guy should change his “look” if he wants to be taken a bit more seriously otherwise he is an easy target to be dismissed by the small and weak minded.

    Stallman is fighting a very important battle, and while I respect his individuality I think he would have to “take one for the team” and get a hair cut and shave before his words are taken in more by the masses.

    Just my 2 cents.

    Good article BTW. :)

  • Anonymous

    Richard stallman is the free gnu/software god. I have so much respect for this man,
    I couldn’t begin to tell you.This is one site i visited where they talk about windows.
    http://en.windows7sins.org and the freedom software foundation fsf.org. Stallman is a genius and any anti-piracy critic could learn allot from someone with whose intelligent like Stallman just sayin’.

    • Anon

      Thanks for the link, what it says about education is so true ( and the general population is sadly so ignorant about ).

      • Anonymous

        Your welcome yes it is very much so.

    • Guest123

      Yeah, right. That free software society loses me at “regardless of how you got your copies, you always have the freedom to copy and change the software, even to sell copies. ” Actually, they lose me when they advocate forcing people to release the source code to their programs, whether they want to or not. And how they say you don’t have to give someone else credit for their work. Seems kinda counterproductive in every way to me.

      • Guest123

        Free Software Foundation. Sorry.

      • Anonymous

        It loses people who aren’t used to it you to have the freedom to do what they want. Make your own distro sell it or give it out for free it’s your freedom. Basically if you choose to. Now when it comes to the proprietary stuff. You aren’t allowed to modify or do what you want or you can get sued etc. I could make my own version of a linux distro call sausage linux if i wanted to lol.

        • Guest123

          People shouldn’t be allowed to just change the name of something and call (and sell) it their own, but from what I’ve read, that’s what he’s advocating. If that comes to pass, I don’t see what the incentive will be for anyone to work on large projects. At the very least, people want acknowledgment of their work.

        • Guest123

          People shouldn’t be allowed to just change the name of something and call (and sell) it their own, but from what I’ve read, that’s what he’s advocating. If that comes to pass, I don’t see what the incentive will be for anyone to work on large projects. At the very least, people want acknowledgment of their work.

        • Guest123

          And please, learn the rules of grammar. It’s hard to understand what you’re trying to say. Your syntax degrades your message.

        • Guest123

          And please, learn the rules of grammar. It’s hard to understand what you’re trying to say. Your syntax degrades your message.

        • Anonymous

          @Guest123
          Don’t be such a fucking hypocrite. People have every right to do what they want. Not everything evolves around copyright law. You sound like a dictator. Copy-left is the total opposite of copyright. Creative commons, general public license or GPL is different from commercial – proprietary licenses. Learn the difference. In the Linux world you can do what you want, that’s the point.Total freedom!! Mostly everyone that makes their own version has some part of another Distro and mostly attribute.
          See in GPL or Creative Commons, that’s the design the ideology, to give credit. The commercial – proprietary industry can’t seems to figure this out spend millions and make crap.
          The successors like Richard Stallman, Linus Torvald and the hundreds of millions of people who contribute their time! That’s what the major players are successful at doing. Life doesn’t revolve around windows and apple, People have other options!
          Who are you to dictate what license someone should have? If Linux/unix and The Linux foundation aswell as all the major Distros are successful like Oracle, Redhat Linux,Debian, canonical “Ubuntu” , Fedora and all the other Linux distributions out there. Who said i can’t? You can’t? Larry Moe and fucking Curly can’t?
          I bet you didn’t even know Android htc is made from Linux half of the servers in the world are run by Linux. It’s freedom!! Total freedom!! Away from Bill gates and from Steve jobs. Away from the money hungry.
          As for my grammar,Thanks !! Next time you might want to think about what you’re saying before you fuck up and correct yourself. Then try correcting someone else because you disagree with them.Totally weak.

        • Guest123

          When the hell did I say anything about Linux? When? Search through my history and find me one instance where I even talked about Linux, much less attacked it. When you try and fail to do that, please consider arguing against me instead of strawmen.

          You know what, I give up. For the life of me, I can’t understand what you’re trying to say, and you change the topic to stuff that doesn’t seem related to what we were initially talking about. This isn’t going to go anywhere. If someone else posts and explains what you were trying to say, I’ll respond. Until then, good day sir.

        • Anonymous

          fsf.org is about free software you didn’t make that clear nor did you link me to the direction of what you babbling about fucktard.I can be nice.Then i can see when a complete asshole thinks he/she is the fucking Einstein of knowledge. Grammar well you need better focus on your topic your tossing towards me.I think you my friend are the one getting confused and all bitchy whinny and cranky like a crackwhore without his/her crack.
          “regardless of how you got your copies, you always have the freedom to copy and change the software, even to sell copies. ” Actually, they lose me when they advocate forcing people to release the source code to their programs, whether they want to or not. And how they say you don’t have to give someone else credit for their work.
          You do realize and if you look further you’ll see that the site has everything to do with Linux or non proprietary software. You didn’t make that clear! if your talking about software altogether then simply say so. Usually when someone doesn’t do full research, nor read fully they get lost and retort to stupidity. Now what fucking software are you talking about? The software he advocates or software in general?

  • Vlegacy

    Using the government to tax consumers and then distributing the revenue to artists based on popularity is just a terrible idea. I’m all for finding more direct ways to support artists, and definitely against attempts to police the internet, but RMS’ alternative is not a good way of handling the problem.

    • Friend of the People

      I agree. I’m not sure why people like this guy so much. Giving the power of “fair compensation” to the government sounds like a really stupid idea, especially since fair compensation based on popularity gives more money to artists like Justin Bieber or Ke$ha more than it does to quality musicians. Why should I trust the government with this power?

  • Pingback: P2PTalk » Richard Stallman Urges Rejection of Anti-Piracy Web Blocking

  • R4v3

    Richard F****** Stallman. Cant hit a link without him waiting on the other side.

    His work made him famous, his look made him immortal.

  • gae

    With no need for a court or judge the isp can pretty much decide to do whatever it wants, block whoever it wants for any reason it likes.
    Wonder how long it will take before it starts charging people a small fee to have their competitors website blocked?

  • MD3

    Just put a broadband levy, a not-for-profit rule, and that’s it! I bet most filesharers would agree!

    • Razza

      Not me. I’m not paying taxes to support artists. Why the hell should I have to pay to support people I don’t care about in the slightest? Why should I give the government any more power than it already has?

      • Razza

        Clarification; I don’t care about all artists, but my tax dollars would support artists in general, so they would naturally go to artists I don’t like.

  • Happy@Larry

    Fuck Stallman, this asshole advocates “Free (but only if you do it my way)” which in other words means not free at all.
    Unfortunately he’s just another media whore now…

    • Anonymous

      The GPL + FSF is all about freedom which can be protected, so that people cannot abuse the term “free software”.

      If code could not be protected in some way or another (a license), it would be continually abused by crapware product manufacturers such as Micro$hite (to say they don’t already steal code would be a joke).

  • Pingback: setteB.IT | Verso il bavaglio di Internet dall’AGCOM? Domani la protesta

  • Foff

    I don’t know who the F is Stallman is but how is this agency going to enforce their censorship. If I was an isp I would give this agency the big big middle finger is they told me to censor something. Who is going to pay the isp’s for their trouble. May be the isp’s will move over the border.

  • http://www.facebook.com/eric.boehm Jack Murdock

    Did people really think that free things would last forever? There is no such thing as a right to not pay for anything. Thats what we call a fantasy.

    Going to the store isn’t that bad. You just give money to the cashier. It’s as simple as that.

    • SuckItYouTard

      Obviously you’ve never heard of copyleft. Which Stallman and a few others advocated. Guess what? All the stuff that is licensed under it is free. And freely distributed. And free to change and modify and pass along to others. FREELY. It’s not fantasy. It’s reality. As much as you hate it, too f*cking bad. It’s here, it’s happening. Deal with it.

      • Haxor

        and if you want to charge money and someone will pay knowing they can get source you are free to do so, and people do…because they dont want to do things like setups….

    • Anonymous

      Do you think any of your opinions count? I didn’t think so stfu.

    • Anonymous

      Do you think any of your opinions count? I didn’t think so stfu.

    • Anonymous

      Its free until Micro$oft gets their hands on it.

    • Scary Devil Monastery

      “Did people really think that free things would last forever?”

      Yes we do, actually. Today I can run a computer with a linux distro installed and happily realize it gives me all of the options of windows 7 and NONE of the problems. And it costs me absolutely zip where i would otherwise have had to pay 500-1000 USD for the licenses alone had i gone with commercial crapware (which, with very rare exceptions is outperformed solidly by the open-source solutions these days).

      The odd thing about that is that those companies giving away large chunks of free software are still raking in cash hand over fist. Like Oracle with Java.

  • Pingback: Richard Stallman Urges Rejection of Anti-Piracy Web Blocking | Links Daily

  • GNU

    I do hope that any website blocking won’t inadvertently block Richard Stallman’s “Free software song”. It’s epic.

  • GNU

    I do hope that any website blocking won’t inadvertently block Richard Stallman’s “Free software song”. It’s epic.

  • GNU

    I do hope that any website blocking won’t inadvertently block Richard Stallman’s “Free software song”. It’s epic.

  • GNU

    I do hope that any website blocking won’t inadvertently block Richard Stallman’s “Free software song”. It’s epic.

  • GNU

    I do hope that any website blocking won’t inadvertently block Richard Stallman’s “Free software song”. It’s epic.

  • GNU

    I do hope that any website blocking won’t inadvertently block Richard Stallman’s “Free software song”. It’s epic.

  • Pingback: Richard Stallman urges rejection of anti-piracy web blocking: Italy’s AGCOM about to give itself the power to remove content and block websites without the need for any legal process. Stallman says Italians should use “what’s left of their democracy

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Don-Dilly/1624894683 Don Dilly

    Anonymous DDosing a small italian gov departmental website will have no effect.
    It is only a public facing site and the gov will just spin the downtime as the action of the same criminals they are trying to stop.

    The best sites to go for are with the PMs site or if they do tax return filings and online payments, hit their IRS site

  • Guest

    Charge me 5$ /month on my broadband access and allow me to download anything in the amount I want without DRM and I sing on the dotted line right now!

    The alternative is to keep the Status Quo and Hollywood will continue getting 0$ from me per month.

    So the choice is easy, either change your tune and get 5$/month from me, or keep business as usual and get 0$ /month from me…

  • Guest

    Richard Stallman for President
    (if you believe in Politics (I don’t))

  • Pingback: Richard Stallman Urges Rejection of Anti-Piracy Web Blocking - techtime's posterous

  • Piersjohn

    for free downloading with less issue try using the torrentsapps toolbar application. you wont have to deal with illegal issues.

  • Tosser

    “Copyright should serve to protect the art and artists. The current system, however, is only in the interests of publishers and delivers only crumbs to almost all of the artists.”

    This.

    If I choose to support artists and artisans, the money should not end up in the net censorship lobby’s war chest.

    Copyright is a necessary evil, but one that seriously needs immediate reform.

  • Pingback: Richard Stallman Urges Rejection of Anti-Piracy Web Blocking | Pixelbean

  • Pingback: Richard Stallman Urges Rejection of Anti-Piracy Web Blocking » OWNI.eu, News, Augmented

  • Majon

    ohh great fascist corrupted government!

  • BTGuard - BitTorrent Anonymously

NewsBits

Even more news...

  • Blu-ray Anti-Piracy Tech Stops Discs and Promotes Purchases

    An anti-piracy system present in all official Blu-ray players since 2012 has received a fresh update...

  • Foxtel Breeds Pirates by Locking Up Game of Thrones

    One of the main reasons why people turn to piracy is the lack of legal alternatives....

  • UK Student Admits Breaching Sony Copyrights With Leak of PS3 SDK

    Last year an Internet user known as El Nomeo leaked version 3.70 of Sony’s Playstation3 SDK...

  • Pirates Can Be Identified Despite Sharing IP Addresses, ISP Claims

    Carrier-Grade Network Address Translation is a network mechanism through which many Internet subscribers can share the...

  • Feds Seize Cash from Major Bitcoin Exchange’s Dwolla Account

    The U.S. Government has taken a significant action against the web’s top Bitcoin exchange by seizing...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

PopularArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.