TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

Sports Reporter Demands Return of Megaupload Files

Kyle Goodwin, sports reporter and owner of OhioSportsNet, has filed a brief at a Virginia federal court urging the US Government to return the files he stored at Megaupload. Goodwin explains that the Megaupload shutdown resulted in direct losses for his company and claims the Government has violated his constitutional rights.

megauploadIn the wake of the MegaUpload shutdown many of the site’s users complained that their personal files had been lost due to collateral damage.

Behind the scenes Megaupload has been negotiating with the Department of Justice to allow these users to temporarily access their files.

“Megaupload’s legal team is working hard to reunite our users with their data. We are negotiating with the Department of Justice to allow all Mega users to retrieve their data,” Kim Dotcom told TorrentFreak previously.

However, weeks have passed by and thus far no workable solution has been found.

Tired of waiting, one Megaupload user has now asked a court to find a way to return his files. Through his attorneys, Kyle Goodwin, owner of the sports news site OhioSportsNet, filed a brief at a federal court in Virginia.

“It is one thing to take legal action against an alleged copyright infringer. It is quite another to do so at the expense of entirely innocent third parties, with no attempt to prevent or even mitigate the collateral damage,” the brief starts.

The attorneys explain that Goodwin signed up for a premium Megaupload account that he used to store raw footage of games, player and coach interviews, and promotional materials for his business. This Megaupload account served as an online backup of the files he stored on his hard drive, in case that crashed.

Unfortunately for Goodwin the hard drive did indeed crash in January, right after Megaupload was shutdown. However, when he attempted to download the backup files, he noticed that Megaupload was no longer operational. As a result, the sports reporter claims to have suffered significant losses.

“The loss of my files has made doing the business of OhioSportsNet difficult,” Goodwin explains in his testimony. “For example, at least four parents had inquired about paying me to put together highlight reels of their children’s sporting events to send to colleges for recruiting purposes. Without my files, I have been unable to do that.”

The attorneys argue that the Government is responsible for this loss, and claim that Goodwin’s Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable search and seizure has been violated.

“The government cannot just execute its search warrant and wipe its hands of any responsibility for the property incidental to that warrant, especially when the government’s actions have the direct effect of impermissibly denying innocent third parties of their property,” they write.

They further argue that Goodwin and many others have become victims of an overbroad takedown.

“Perhaps in an attempt to avoid responsibility for its seizure, the government has alleged that some data on the servers consists of infringing copies of copyrighted works. However, the potential presence of others’ infringing files does not diminish the Court’s responsibility to safeguard customers’ lawful and noninfringing files and provide for their return,” the brief reads.

Goodwin hopes that the court will ensure that the matter is resolved, and demands the return of his files, and the files of others who are in the same position as himself.

Related Posts

Previous Post | Next Post

  • Pingback: Un periodista deportivo demanda al Gobierno de EEUU por la pérdida de sus archivos alojados en Megaupload [ENG]

  • Stan

    FAIL!

    • http://twitter.com/icanhazsake Ninja

      You are either talking about yourself or about the US Govt. I’ll pick the second and hit ‘like’ in your post ;)

      • LAKEISHA

        @Zig my neiǵhbòr’s sisťer ṁaķes $84/hr òn ťhe còṁpuťer. She has been fired fròṁ ẃòrķ Ḟòr Ḟive ṁònťhs buť lasť ṁònťh her pay checķ ẃas $17387 jusť ẃòrķinǵ on ťhe ĉoṁpuťer for a feẃ hours. Ŕe<!—>ad ṁore on this ẃeḃ site..MakeCash2.com–>

        • Bloaxor

          T’his ?a??ò? li?es it’ in the butt. ?ead ?ore on ?e? site..DoWeGiveAFuck.nope

      • Lord of the Files

        The best analogy I can think of for this debacle would be the government arresting the owner/operator of a massive storage facility, like those seen on the A&E show Storage Wars (you know, where members of the public pay to rent space), seizing ALL of the items being stored there, and then deciding to destroy ALL of these seized belongings without bothering to check if any of it actually does break the law. Some units will inevitably contain something or other which does, but the vast majority won’t. People demanding to get their data back have every right to be angry and making a fuss because what the government is doing is completely wrong. The copyright industry/trolls constantly argue that a bunch of ones and zeros are exactly the same as physical property and we’re about to see that claim put to the test. It will be very interesting to see whether or not the justice system agrees and what kind of precedent might be set because of it.

    • Guest

      You know what do you expect from a government who attacked a country that was not threatening to steal the oil?

      How do you call a government who lied to invade a defenseless country causing hundred of thousand of collateral casualties and thousand of US soldiers death?

      Oh! I know! Fascist!

      Why do you thing they will care about the data of few millions people while doing the deed of their friends the entertainment corporate parasites?

      We shall jail the entire Bush/Cheney administration for war crimes.

      We shall jail the entire Obama/Joe Biden administration for flagrantly violating the US constitution.

      The FBI, the NSA, the CIA the TSA and homeland security shall be purged.

      • Tomk13

        Why don’t you get leave fascist USA then and go somewhere with real democracy like Iran.

        • Anonymous

          He’s probably afraid of being killed by the USA’s poorly managed arsenal of killer drones and psychologically stunted hate-mongering soldiers. I know not everyone is the same but it only takes a few entitled asshats.

      • Antidote

        You dont know much about fascism, moron. Coward haters like you are a disgreace to the great culture of sharing and caring. With you and your likes at the barricades we are doomed to loose any fight against the world order of profit and interest.

      • http://profiles.google.com/zerianis10 Christopher Kidwell

        No, we shouldn’t jail the entire Obama administration, because they have not ‘flagrantly violated the US Constitution’ in the slightest.

    • Anonymous

      ṁy claśśṁate’ś aunt Ṁakeś $76/ĥour on tĥe internet. Śĥe ĥaś been Witĥout Work for 9 ṁontĥś but laśt Ṁontĥ ĥer pay Waś $8817 juśt Working on tĥe internet for a feW ĥourś. Ŕeaď Ṁore ĥere …Goo.gl/189kz

  • http://twitter.com/bluie_ bluie

    nazis!

    I’m sorry. It was irresistable. :P

    • Zig

      He’s called Goodwin, not Godwin!!! Nice try though – oh, and you Godwin, you lose by the way LOL

      • http://twitter.com/bluie_ bluie

        Yeah i guess you are right. I lose. I still think it was pretty funny though :P

        • Zig

          Oh without a doubt… keep ‘em coming :D

      • Timo

        It is called Godwin’s law, you moron.

        • FinalApokylypse

          And yet you still got the reference… Funny that, lol.

  • Anonymous

    This is good to see when clearly Kyle Goodwin has lost patience with the delaying tactics of the Department of Justice Punishment. He is right to say that waiting for them is going nowhere quickly.

    The DoJ are simply wanting to wring their hands on this matter and have directly told Carpathia to delete the files evidence. Even the MPAA are upset about that one and want the data kept.

    Who can say what is going on beyond that when even Carpathia are now in court wanting someone to pay their $2000 a day operating cost. That bill is already up to $154,000 since Mega got raided.

    So I would imagine it is all a case of the DoJ providing the funds to get MegaUpload back in action so people can get their data. There is a whole level beyond that including access rights, link access rights, delete access rights and can the DoJ really stop the distribution of infringing content? I would doubt they can.

    This data is stored encrypted so not even Carpathia can do anything with it without the help of both Mega and the DoJ.

    • http://twitter.com/CheapassFiction AeliusBlythe

      DoJ has Carpathia delete files.
      People discover the true meaning of “theft.”

      Not copied.
      Not shared.
      Gone.

      Who knows how many people have had/will have their work truly stolen like this and just can’t afford the lawyers to speak up.

      • Aj47951

        I to have have had work stolen from these government fucks! The game I was working on useing the UDK I had been backing them up on megaupload but my harddrive got hit by lighting and I have lost mouths of work >:( I would Sue but I’m only 18 and I don’t have that kind of money to take on the government. This just makes me hate my government even more as a US citizen I fucking hate my government :(

        • Anonymous

          And you of course have already filled out the form with the EFF letting them know you want your data back right?
          The EFF represents people like you in cases like this for free.

        • Anon

          No local backups at all not even a USB pen?

          Trusting any online back up 100% is truly not wise. You might want to find out about syncing software so next time you have more than one backup.

          Stick in a few USB pens/drives then sync off (using auto sync software) to them and then online – this is a very cheap way to backup that actually works for a one man band. Actually done right online backup is not needed.

          Hope you get your files back this is the unconsidered carnage they caused going after mega. They just ruined part of the economy doing this as many business people used mega.

        • Sjococo

          You don’t have to sue. Just write a polite letter to the same court as Goodwin did and ask for access to your files. All people with files stored at MegaUpload should do that, but only if the files are legal. Not smart to indict yourself, is it?

        • Bloaxor

          Ouch bro, sad to hear your game got boned. :[

          And Sjococo got something there, suing is so duhhhfuckthis these days anyways.

      • Guest

        Will you marry me?

      • Guest

        Will you marry me?

  • John

    And like Mr Goodwin there might be many more innocent victims and business unfairly and even unconstitucionally harmed by their governments apathetic and careless actions , caught up in the middle of an unnecessary and poimtless struggle, if these are the government’s priorities it’s sad to watch.

  • E-k-nut

    I come from the country of WakaWaka. Where can I file a complaint to have the feds take down all US websites for violating Wakawaka copyright laws?

    Note: Wakawaka is a fictional country. But if they existed, would YOU violate their laws?

  • http://twitter.com/icanhazsake Ninja

    BS, no such a thing as legal content stored on cyberlockers.

    /MAFIAATroll

    Mega will come back at full power while laughing of the US. If I were Dotcom I’d remove the takedown system, take the servers to friendly places and show a huge middle finger to the MAFIAA after this is over. Want your content taken down? Send a takedown notice and we’ll process it but allow up to two years for us to proceed an investigation to determine the file holder doesn’t have the proper copyrights. Yeah, if the takedown notices pile up it’s not our fault ;)

    The MAFIAA is the worst thing that ever happened to culture.

    • http://profiles.google.com/zerianis10 Christopher Kidwell

      Actually, that is what under the DMCA as it is written now they are allowed to do. The people who say that they have the ‘rights’ to content in question are supposed to back it up in numerous ways before these companies have to take it down.

  • MadAsASnake

    The brief makes it pretty plain: DOJ had/has a responsibility to protect innocent third parties and has done nothing at all to honour that responsibility. And here we have a genuine US business user seeing his legitimate business destroyed by these broad brush actions. So while MPAA struggles to cook figures to show they are losing money to “piracy”, genuine damage is happening to other parties.

  • Jack Murdock

    Im guessing that not all people’s date is technically theirs…

    • MadAsASnake

      It is neither for the DOJ nor MPAA etc to make that decision.

    • Zig

      No, but their data is.

    • Blackbeard

      So, apart from the people who actually own their data (such as Goodwin, who actually owned his data and has been directly affected), the people don’t own their data.

      You do realised you just argued against your position, right?

  • http://www.facebook.com/MikeyCarter1974 Michael Carter

    If the US Government is this unconcerned with collateral damage of the innocent… it really makes you wonder what happens when US troops get involved?

    It’s like that Family Guy episode where Peter blows up a Children’s hospital to burn down a competitors sign.

    • Kr0nZ

      yeh they kill those 100′s of civilians, but atleast they got that one terrorist… maybe.

      that really shows how much the US just doesnt give a shit about… well anyone

      • Vrillco

        That one terrorist” who only existed on film, and was largely dismissed as a ghost story by the locals.

        “That one terrorist” who served as jerkoff material for an unprecedented power grab and countless crimes against humanity.

        “That one terrorist” who was magically caught, killed, and disposed of, all in one swift flick of the pen.

        Yeah, I feel so much safer now that they’ve dealt with that one terrorist. So safe, in fact, that even though I don’t live there, I’ve been shopping for a new citizenship to get me even farther away from that fascist nation.

        • http://profiles.google.com/zerianis10 Christopher Kidwell

          Well, I’m not looking for a new citizenship. I’m looking to change things in America and wake people up to the fact that the powergrab that was done after 9/11 is the biggest danger to America, not foreign terrorists, who have been able to kill a grand total of 5K people in the United States in the past 100 years.

          Compare that to 10 times that number killed each year in car accidents.

    • surfer

      or fly a couple of planes into building to start a war.

  • Patternguru714 Fani

    DOJ stuff aside, this guy’s an idiot for not reading the terms of service. Even Google Docs takes no responsibility for your files and they can delete them or lose them and not help you. This guy’s a fool for using a cloud service with a hands-off “as is” and “we can do whatever we want at any time” contract. If he had any chance of compensation, all cloud services would be peeing their pants. Gdocs loses items all the time and doesn’t recover for users. In fact, Google is most likely on the opposite side of this particular individual suit for that reason. Mega’s terms of service:

    “It is important to note that Megaupload clearly warned users to keep copies of any files they uploaded. Megaupload.com expressly informed users through its Frequently Asked Questions (‘FAQs’) and its Terms of Service that users have no proprietary interest in any of the files on Megaupload’s servers, they assume the full risk of complete loss or unavailability of their data, and that Megaupload can terminate site operations without prior notice.”

    • Zig

      But the flaw in your argument is that those are MegaUpload’s terms and the reason the files are unavailable has nothing to do with MegaUpload. The US govt has taken MU offline, so the MU terms of service are not applicable in any way. However, the US govt does have to abide by certain operating procedures – one of which is to ensure that the kind of scenario the article talks about does not happen. It was the US govt’s duty to only take offending parts of the site offline or at least provide affected users caught up in the mess with access to their files in a timely manner (which technically could have been arranged in a matter of minutes at most), but a couple of months later and those users are still sitting around waiting for access to their own data. The US govt is clearly in breach if the constitution without a shadow of a doubt.

      • Zig

        *of

      • Sjococo

        Exactly!

        And isn’t it the US goverment who have to pay the bills for the seized servers to the hostng companies like Carpatia and Leaseweb?

        • http://profiles.google.com/zerianis10 Christopher Kidwell

          Under our system of law? Yes. It is evidence in a CRIMINAL CASE, they don’t have any bipping right to say “No, we will not pay for the upkeep!” if it is evidence in a case.

    • Anonymous

      Did megaupload “terminate site operations without prior notice”? – NO.

      Megas ToS protects mega from claims for data loss…..It DOES NOT protect the USG/DoJ when they steal the data.

      • Mwhahaha

        You’re getting into pointless semantics at the point. You’re right, but when he signed up to MU he was told it wasn’t infallible so he should have made a separate copy anyway. Which frankly I’ll be surprised if he hasn’t and he’s either just being a chancer or makign a very valid point about this illegal seizure.

        • Joeschmo2000

          But it wasn’t Mega’s responsibility because THEY were not at fault here. The TOS does not come into play here, since Mega was basically forcibly taken down by an outside source beyond the limitations set by a TOS. That is why he is urging the government to give back the files, not Megaupload. Seems as if he understands that it was the governments fault and Mega is not in violation of the TOS that he agreed to. Mega was ERASED along with all its’ data, essentially, from existence. The ONLY way to get that data back is to petition the government to release it, since it was seized (illegally IMO) by them. If this was a case of Mega closing its’ doors voluntarily or because of a loss of data, then he would be asking Mega for the files back, not the government.

        • MadAsASnake

          Not always that straightforward – it can depend on the timings. I personally recommend at least 2 backups, one of which should not be local – filehosting is perfect as one of these. Even a setup like this will fail if you get a double strike (as in this article) before the next backup cycle. Having the DOJ acting in such a manner would not have been a risk I’d have considered when setting up a backup strategy.

    • Mwhahaha

      That was kinda my cynical assed view too in one respect. No-one can guarantee any data storage security. You could back up onto 15 different drives/services and thru a freak run of coincidences be left mourning the fact that you didn’t have a 16th copy somewhere.

      Personally I go with PC, EHD and cloud to back up anything important that I never want to lose. I wouldn’t trust any third party service to be my only back up just on the fact that fuck ups happen, especially in companies.

      Having said all that, I’m very much hoping this guy wins the case again the DoJ to set the precedent which means they’ll have to have some consideration for legal users in future seizures. Of which they’ll be many, I don’t doubt.

      As for people saying your argument is flawed, then I disagree. When people sign up to these services they are told the service doesn’t ensure 100% success, so *regardless* of what has actually happened to this guy’s data he was warned that he should keep another copy as a matter of course.

      Sucks to be him atm, but let’s hope he doesn’t end up in a 5 year battle to get something akin to justice.

      • MadAsASnake

        It’s also been very disruptive to anyone trying to use Mega (or other hosting services) as a distribution channel. Setting up a distribution channel and advertising it etc can be quite an undertaking and it’s made very difficult if the hosting services are not behaving in a stable and predictable manner. No business at all of MAFIAA but they do not care if they mess it up.

    • Uth

      You can not sue Mega but you can DoJ – There is nothing in terms of service that if someone steals files from MU you can not sue them to return it …

  • Twilightcoents

    They could buy megaupload.net on auction at sedo.com http://www.sedo.co.uk/auction/auction_detail.php?language=e&auction_id=126320

    • Stephen Fry

      What would be the point? … make a memorial website is the only idea I’ve come up with.

      • Twilightcoents

        How about a blog with recent news on the case and where things are headed?

  • Pingback: Sports Reporter Demands Return of Megaupload Files | Virginia News Press | Virginia Breaking News Headlines | Virginia News Directory

  • Anonymous

    Let us not forget that MegaUpload stored 25 PetaBytes of data (or more correctly 25 Pebibyte)

    25 PB = 25,000 TB
    25 PB = 25,000,000 GB
    25 PB = 25,000,000,000 MB

    So that is about 5.5 million 4.5GB DVDs or 35.7 million 700MB movies. Or a single person can watch 1080p HD video for almost 159 years to equal that data size.

    As we can imagine that is a vast amount of lawful data. I only lost some cute pony pictures in this MegaUpload raid but as I spread my data around I would lose something from most of them like HotFile has a photo slideshow I made for a friend.

  • foff

    This ill advised move by the DOJ has set back cloud services big time. The federal government has just completely destroyed anyone’s trust in such services. This was a developing and promising industry. It has always been the dream of software developers to rent software rather than sell it. A service means a continuing stream of income where as a product means a one time transaction. The idea of cloud is to provide a service.

    While megaupload or whatever the file hoster as a terms of contract they may want to limit liability, the fact is their service is only as good as they are so even though they don’t want to be liable for specific data their business depends on them being dependable. What was not contemplated here was a third party ie the US government destroying the business.

    I don’t know if it is a good example or not but when was the last time a gun or ammunition manufacturer was shut down by the feds because guns kill so many people? Just because a file hoster is a convenient way to share files and is misused by some does not make the entire industry an organized crime conspiracy as the feds or maafia allege.

    This is why I hope in the end that the feds are bitch slapped in the court. The fbi and the Mafiaa want to legislate and invent law via the courts. In what way is being a file hoster a criminal conspiracy? If that is the case then anything that assists a criminal commit a crime is a criminal conspiracy. Building a car is a criminal conspiracy because a car facilitates their get a way. Go shut down car companies fuking fbi. So fuck you FBI and Mafiaa.

    • Guest

      Foff,

      Your examples are nothing but a construction of bullshit piles.

      Honesty was shot between the eyes at point blank on Torrentfreak years ago, and you are holding the very same smoking gun.

      Lets face it – amongst the terra bytes of legal homework in the cyber locker cloud, there is enough copyright infringement to get the attention from copyright holders all over the world. Premium payments and affiliate programs makes this business model a criminal conspiracy in the eyes of the beholders – the music artists, the software developers, the movie industry, the authors, the photographers…

      The Mafiaa is a global tool. MegaUpload was bad by default for file sharing.

      Voff.

      • MadAsASnake

        So by that argument, cars are bad by default because some people drive drunk?

  • Guest

    I say we need to blow this up into a Joe the Plumber PR tool.

  • TheOiulkj

    When there’s a terrorist standing in a group of children, what’s the best course of action?

    BLOW THEM ALL THE F*** UP!!!!

    Thanks U.S. government, you’ve taught me well. I feel like I can go on as a respectable citizen now. -_____-

    • Desu75

      You hit the nail on the head there. Kill 1 terrorist and create 5 more. That’s how the US War on Terror policy is working, war on drugs, and now the war on piracy.

  • Pingback: Sports Reporter Demands Return of Megaupload Files

  • Nagisa

    Can I say some dirty words? If not, I really don’t have anything to say.

  • Pingback: MPAA: If Megaupload Gets Data Back They’ll Relaunch | U Torrent Free Download

  • http://www.webstatsart.com/ Webstats Art

    What is megaupload? I cannot see anything on that site except a sticker?

  • Patternguru714 Fani

    Guys, this stuff happens all the time in other industries and the precedents are fairly clear. Many corporations are shut down due to criminal action in the USA. Regardless of the product or industry, any property owned by consumers and held at the company OR any consumer money currently in process at the company is the responsibility of the company, or its owners/defendants. The end consumers then civil sue what’s left of the company OR if the company is defunct they sue the former owners individually. The DOJ or whomever presses criminal action resulting in the company shutdown is never responsible. No matter what you think about this particular case, that’s the rule. It makes sense if you consider that a convicted person ends up not just responsible for their crime against the government (criminal charges) but they end up responsible for everyone their crime indirectly hurt (civil charges from users). It’s as it should be, as far as general due process goes. It’s also one of the reasons every single online service, even dating sites, have full waivers of any liability in their agreements. By using them you usually agree that anything that happens is nobody’s fault, and you waive most of your rights. More expensive cyber-lockers have Quality of Service terms which can give you some money or guarantee if something happens, but never the “perceived value” of your actual content. That’s just nutty. Otherwise you could pay $15, store a copy of your PhD dissertation on it and sue them for the cost of a year of education when it gets deleted. Be mad at the accusation the DOJ is making if you want, but at least understand the domestic laws involved.

    • MadAsASnake

      Pretty sure that the DOJ can be held accountable for malicious prosecution. Also DOJ has a responsibility to protect innocent third parties from unneccessary loss which it has not done.

  • Patternguru714 Fani

    Guys, this stuff happens all the time in other industries and the precedents are fairly clear. Many corporations are shut down due to criminal action in the USA. Regardless of the product or industry, any property owned by consumers and held at the company OR any consumer money currently in process at the company is the responsibility of the company, or its owners/defendants. The end consumers then civil sue what’s left of the company OR if the company is defunct they sue the former owners individually. The DOJ or whomever presses criminal action resulting in the company shutdown is never responsible. No matter what you think about this particular case, that’s the rule. It makes sense if you consider that a convicted person ends up not just responsible for their crime against the government (criminal charges) but they end up responsible for everyone their crime indirectly hurt (civil charges from users). It’s as it should be, as far as general due process goes. It’s also one of the reasons every single online service, even dating sites, have full waivers of any liability in their agreements. By using them you usually agree that anything that happens is nobody’s fault, and you waive most of your rights. More expensive cyber-lockers have Quality of Service terms which can give you some money or guarantee if something happens, but never the “perceived value” of your actual content. That’s just nutty. Otherwise you could pay $15, store a copy of your PhD dissertation on it and sue them for the cost of a year of education when it gets deleted. Be mad at the accusation the DOJ is making if you want, but at least understand the domestic laws involved.

  • Pingback: Sports Reporter Demands Return of Megaupload Files – BlogStream – Latest online streaming news and gossip

  • Pingback: GNC-2012-04-05 #755 Live from Indy - Geek News Central

  • Patternguru714 Fani

    @MadAsASnake in response to: “Pretty sure that the DOJ can be held accountable for malicious prosecution. Also DOJ has a responsibility to protect innocent third parties from unneccessary loss which it has not done. ”

    You’re absolutely correct regarding “malicious prosecution.” My statements apply only in the case where defendants (or a defendant corporation) is found guilty. If it does turn out the DOJ has email or other clear communication evidence that MegaUpload or its officers promoted illegal content storage for corporate gain, it’ll be tough to prove malicious prosecution. All ethical or personal arguments aside, current law removes their DMCA “compliance” protection if that intent is proven. And unfortunately the DOJ rarely indicts if they don’t think they have a slam dunk. Then again this is a new topic for them so who knows. Megaupload may also have a shot if the complicated international arrest and seizure procedures were flubbed.

    As far as “protecting innocent third-parties,” I believe the EFF is claiming this but it might be a fight since there’s probably little precedent in the context of data storage, especially when the third-parties had already waived recourse in terms of service (regardless of to whom they waived it). Historically the DOJ’s responsibility to protect third-parties has even been tossed out in cases where people lost land and physical property such as houses and buildings. The EFF rarely wins such fights, but as in far left or right politics, they do a great job of shedding light on issues and evolving the system in a more reasonable direction for all.

  • Pingback: Pirate Bay Promotion has 5000+ plus artist lined up – BlogStream – Latest online streaming news and gossip

  • Pingback: Court Kicks Out Copyright Troll Who Has “No Desire To Litigate” – BlogStream – Latest online streaming news and gossip

  • Anonymous
  • Pingback: Megaupload Host Refuses to Delete User Data and Evidence, For Now | TorrentFreak

  • Pingback: Megaupload: Feds trying to destroy evidence | OzHouse Alt News

  • Pingback: US: Megaupload’s Hosting Company Might be Sued Next | Top News Story

  • Juju

    it’s all thanks to the dirty jews.

  • Pingback: Why Am I Not Hearing More About Kim Dotcom? | The Underground Multiplex

  • BTGuard - BitTorrent Anonymously

NewsBits

Even more news...

  • Blu-ray Anti-Piracy Tech Stops Discs and Promotes Purchases

    An anti-piracy system present in all official Blu-ray players since 2012 has received a fresh update...

  • Foxtel Breeds Pirates by Locking Up Game of Thrones

    One of the main reasons why people turn to piracy is the lack of legal alternatives....

  • UK Student Admits Breaching Sony Copyrights With Leak of PS3 SDK

    Last year an Internet user known as El Nomeo leaked version 3.70 of Sony’s Playstation3 SDK...

  • Pirates Can Be Identified Despite Sharing IP Addresses, ISP Claims

    Carrier-Grade Network Address Translation is a network mechanism through which many Internet subscribers can share the...

  • Feds Seize Cash from Major Bitcoin Exchange’s Dwolla Account

    The U.S. Government has taken a significant action against the web’s top Bitcoin exchange by seizing...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

PopularArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.