TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

U.S. Copyright Group ‘Steal’ Competitor’s Website

The U.S. Copyright Group (USCG) has been all over the news in recent months. The lawyer group sued thousands of BitTorrent users who allegedly file-shared motion pictures belonging to their clients, including the Oscar-winning Hurt Locker. However, it turns out that USCG are not copyright purists either, as they have blatantly copied the website of a competitor without permission.

During May this year the makers of The Hurt Locker filed a complaint against the first 5,000 ‘John Does’. Helped by the U.S. Copyright Group (USCG), the film makers are requesting the personal details of individuals behind the IP-addresses that allegedly shared the film on BitTorrent.

With these personal details in hand, USCG is planning to send out a batch of settlement requests asking the alleged file-sharers to pay amounts up to $2,500, or risk a full trial and a heftier fine instead. In recent months USCG has already sent out similar ‘speculative invoices’ to downloaders of other films, including the indie movie Far Cry.

It’s needless to say that the administrative process to handle thousands of settlements will involve quite a bit of work. To make this easier for themselves and the alleged downloaders, USCG recently put up a settlement website where visitors to their main website Copyrightsettlements.info are redirected to.

By itself the mere existence of this settlement portal wouldn’t really be newsworthy, but this changed when we realized that they had copied it from a competitor.

Six weeks ago a TorrentFreak reader alerted us that USCG was setting up a new website to deal with the settlements. Instead of coding the site themselves, they had simply copied the code (including the copyright statement) and images from a company in the same line of work. The images below show how both sites looked at the time.

Copied website before it was stripped (large)

c

Source (large)

c

Because the USCG site was hosted on a force.com subdomain, we weren’t able to verify the legitimacy of this site to find out if there was indeed a direct connection to USCG. To be honest, we simply couldn’t believe that USCG would be stupid enough to blatantly rip-off a website like this, so we assumed that someone had tried to pull off a prank.

A month after the email, however, the same site popped up again when we tried to access the website of USCG. Although the original layout was stripped down significantly over the past weeks, the website still uses code and images from the Copyright Enforcement Group.

Initially, USCG even listed their competitor’s phone number on their site, but they were wise enough to remove this and other texts that refer to the Copyright Enforcement Group. That said, there is no doubt that USCG’s website is ‘stolen’.

Both the source code and the copied image names clearly reveal that the code was blatantly copied from their competitors. Armed with this knowledge we decided to contact the victims of this apparent violation to ask if they had perhaps authorized this use. The answer we got was clear.

“Thank you for bringing this to our attention. We are not associated with the US Copyright Group and they are not authorized to use Copyright Enforcement Group materials,” a representative of the Copyright Enforcement Group told TorrentFreak in a response.

The same representative told TorrentFreak that the US Copyright Group and Dunlap, Grubb & Weaver will be receiving a cease and desist from Copyright Enforcement Group.

Of course, we’ve seen this type of behavior before. The UK’s ACS:Law, also writing to thousands of file-sharers demanding cash payments for alleged infringements, aren’t whiter than white either. They took sections of several news articles and tried, unsuccessfully, to pass them off as their own content on their company website.

So there we have it once again. An outfit that targets copyright infringers is actively infringing copyright themselves. They are so incompetent and probably blinded by the dollar signs in their eyes, that they can’t even put a website together without breaking the law themselves – copyright law.

Update: USCG has started to remove some images after our post. This file, among others, has been replaced by a ‘placeholder’. A confession?

Update: They removed even more images. Also, their ‘copyright’ text was stolen as well…

Related Posts

Previous Post | Next Post

  • Caliburn

    Luckily for them, they haven’t copied one of my website designs yet. Otherwise they’d quickly find themselves sued.

  • Bob

    Wow. These people fail at the very thing they are trying to fight.

  • LinuxTrance

    Wow, how thick can ya get?

  • chtit_draco

    Great article and investigation work !

  • chtit_draco

    Well my message got stripped of its link. So, in the link to the first image, just replace the “2″ by a “1″ and it works perfectly.

    Cheers!

    TF: Thanks, it’s fixed now

  • Whatever

    A bit of a weak response, just the obvious. Seems they will not be going after them.

    However, if they do, let the (lawyer) fights begin and let them finish each other off (keeps them away from filesharers).

    Time for an infringment collecting website collecting all the Imaginary Property purists own ‘crimes’ (HADOPI, Canada MAFIAA keeping billions, selling a free song…., copying web content, manufacturing evidence). A sort of IP Leaks.

    @TF
    You should have asked if they will send them a ‘speculative invoice’ now or send them to the website to settle. LOL

  • Pirat

    @2

    They aren’t fighting it, they are profiting from it.

  • Pingback: Tweets that mention U.S. Copyright Group ‘Steal’ Competitor’s Website | TorrentFreak -- Topsy.com

  • Joe Hickster

    Great find (Wonder how I missed it lol) Please see here http://tinyurl.com/29zxgdg
    for a list of links regarding ACS:LAW and thank to all of you that have helped with my Blog at http://acsbore.wordpress.com/

    Keep up the GREAT work

  • Whatever

    @TF (offtopic)
    The problems with the comment system i and others (except 3rd) have sometimes:

    1. Comment disappears and when sending again it says it was already sent. Changing a detail allows to send again but disappears again. Usually it ends up being a common English word not accepted.
    2. “Posting too fast” randomly. Waiting a few seconds to a few minutes seems to fix that.
    3. When comments do get accepted the page indefinetally keeps loading, reload solves that. (browser: Shiretoko x64)

    Maybe, if you have the time, you could have a look at it.

  • duane

    So, is the “Copyright Enforcement Group” going to “enforce” its copyrights against Dunlap, Grubb & Weaver, or does it not “enforce” them on fellow money-grubbing sharks?

  • Rob

    Ahhhh, $$$$$…. the one true evil creating chaos since the dawn of man!

  • Law-nmower

    Nice.

    I guess the way copyright and software patents are set up by now, it will be hard if not almost impossible in near future to set up, design or develop anything without infringing someone.

    So, there you have it: they shoot themselves :)

  • lol

    and they expect us to feel wrong about sharing..

    bahahahaha..

    not only is it morally right to share, its your responsibility.

    Unless you want your life run by corrupt business men out to ruin your life.. you better get sharing.

  • anonymous

    regardless of what the Copyright Enforcement Group decides to do about this ‘infringement’, USCG will only, if absolutely necessary and they feel like it, apologise for their lack of judgement and decorum. they will not pay any fees if asked for and certainly would not accept any sort of legal action taken against them either. therefore, what is good for them (apologising for unauthorised copyright infringement) should be good for everyone else! :-) all those in favour say ‘AYE’

  • anony

    What’s really sad is the irony is probably completely lost on them.

    The only thing that could make this better is a lawsuit.

  • Annie Moose

    How mindbogglingly retarded are these people?! Don’t they know that the instant you start pointing fingers, everyone is going to be scrutinizing you? Why make it easy for us?!

  • Proud Pirate….

    Excellent work Ernesto!

    Would love to see any follow up you can get on it…

  • Milo

    @16: They’re pretty retarded. Most don’t seem to have any Idea what they’re trying to do.

  • Pingback: 3 Count: Supreme Fail | PlagiarismToday

  • T

    What hypocrites they are. This world is full of them.

    That sad thing is they probably will get a 2nd chance to correct it, unlike what they are doing to many 1000′s of other people, giving no 2nd chances and ruining lives.

  • Tomas

    The copied site shows the logo to say they are an authorize.net verified merchant. The new site doesn’t show that, so I’ll assume it was just something that showed up after stealing the web design.

    Surely that is another infringement, as they are misleading people into thinking they have been verified by an independent third party when in fact, they have not.

  • Donker

    U.S Racketeering Group

    should be a more appropriate name

  • matt

    I wonder if this can be used as evidence agaist USCG in a copyright case against the alleged infingers

  • DJDANK

    it should be United States Douchabaggery Group…..what a bunch of gomers!

  • Doink

    This is ok as long as pierates are not doing it.

  • Pingback: Tweets that mention U.S. Copyright Group ‘Steal’ Competitor’s Website | TorrentFreak -- Topsy.com

  • mr

    Imo cec should fine them $2.8k per hour of infringement

    Remember Jamie Thomas case it’s 1.92 million. So why the hell 1.92 and not make it 2? Simple because the figure sounds official and calculated of course we know thats bullshit!

    So that’ll be $2.8k/hr uscg…out of thin air yep that’s right we pull it. taste your own medicine

  • Ninja

    LOL. Reminds me of the Hadopi logo case..

    A failure inside a failure. Now that’s something to laugh hard heh

    Actually, even if copyright moves into a more free approach, there should still be ways to register your work so in cases of blatant copy the company that copied the contents can be exposed as a bad company. Then creativity will make total sense not because you’ll be sued but cause you’ll lose credibility.

  • Pingback: U.S. Copyright Group ‘Steal’ Competitor’s Website | Systema

  • me

    Shows clearly just how much all these lawsuits are actually done to protect intellectual property….

  • Anonymous

    “Wow. These people fail at the very thing they are trying to fight.”

    No. you are wrong. They are not trying to fight anything. They are trying to fill up their pockets like the good pack of parasites they are.

    DO NOT GIVE ANY MONEY TO THESE PIECES OF HUMAN GARBAGE!

    PLEASE DO NOT CONTRIBUTE TO THIS DISEASE!

  • GeorgeFBush

    If you rip that site off, can you then use it to settle the copyright infringement?

  • MY

    The old adage is true: There is no honor among thieves.

  • Gill Bates

    OMFG, what a bunch of f-nut tards! They should be sued like no tomorrow and lose their contract and all business. Unbelievable, what a bunch of morons!

  • djizle

    now im curious if this will help the 1000′s of people there trying to sue. i would think that a way to make it pretty clear to a jury that its basically a scam that there trying to pull on american citizens. i wonder if the lawyers even know what bittorrent is or does, what a video file is comprised of,or even a full understanding of computers period. they probably said “gosh darn lets ask these directors that made horrible movies if we can try to rape these people for etra profit and to make us rich at the same time” “wince we dont know jack about computers what so ever or what were trying to sue people for lets just steal it from someone who does know about this stuff, that way we dont have to pay for computer experts”

  • 133t

    epic

    /

  • TerribleTony

    Why are the other group sending a cease and desist? Surely they should be sending them a settlement letter?

  • Flying Dutchman

    @32
    Don’t think they would be stupid enough to send a Settlement letter. They will never settle and they know it. They only prey for the weak and defenceless…

    Someone really needs to hack into these companies mailservers and publish their E-mails…

    Just as they did with MediaDefender >:)

  • Anonymous

    USCG – you are a bunch of retards.

    please see the term – retard: http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=retard

    thx

  • habits changed

    Now when you check the USCG site, they have changed the page. Somebody has to hold them accountable for this blunder, especially given their line of work.

  • rf

    It wouldn’t surprise me if this was just a slip-up of presenting the collusion between these groups to the outside world, hence CEG’s neutered response.

  • Pingback: WHAT REALLY HAPPENED | The Ruthless Truth blog

  • Jeff

    The phrase “Do as I say, not as I do,” applies here.

    Somehow, I am not in the least bit surprised about this. After all, the clients of similar legal firms (the MAFIAA) do this all the time. And Disney is one of the worst violators.

  • Anonymous

    The dirty thieves!

  • Blood

    The simple explanation. The person hired to build the website is the same for both.

    That explains how they obtained the source code, how they didn’t know they were copying another site.

    It’s common between web developers/designers to find previous work and just start from there…honestly who will start from scratch when you have previously built the same functional website.

    Although usually i would expect people to be building it locally before risking web exposure.

  • Bob

    I just check their website again…viewed the source. At the very bottom of the code … does anyone else find it odd that they closed the tag twice .. the second contains an input tag linking something back to Salesforce.com.

    Can we say two counts of blatant copyright infringement?

    USCG has lost all credibility…I intend on ignoring anything they send to me.

  • Bob

    @Blood

    You are a moron. Right-click, view page source, is how you get the source code of any website coded in plain HTML.

  • bloodyloosers

    They didn’t copy it they own both firm and just wanted to push PR away from USCG to CEG…

    Both copyright…group…
    and then they copied from each other…

    Why should someone copy a website with a PayPal login?

    They own both, I am almost sure..

  • in.cog.nito

    @39

    I am a web developer by profession. As it is true, if we have developed code that works in one instance, you do not reinvent the wheel, but ANY self respecting developer would at least re-skin the website with different graphics, and change the source code in the metadata.

  • Anonymous
  • tosser

    Someone should post this on http://www.youthoughtwewouldntnotice.com

  • That guy

    Fantastic work, turning one against another.. LOL

  • Pingback: Anti-P2P lawyers accused of copyright hypocrisy | BJD Productions blog

  • Pingback: Anti-P2P lawyers accused of copyright hypocrisy

  • Anonymous

    I actually support the USCG but I have to admit this is pretty funny. lol.

  • Simon

    Stuff like this is too funny

  • NeoStylish

    You guys are missing the point!

    By infringing on copyright, they’re just trying to show you how wrong and evil piracy really is!

    Yeah, that must be it…

  • Anonymous

    @49
    If you support them you should be ashamed of what they did.

  • Rob

    @49
    If you support them you should be ashamed of what they did.

  • Pingback: iWinUX.net – Where actual journalism looks better » U.S. Copyright Group uses competitor’s stolen website design

  • Pingback: Anti-P2P lawyers accused of copyright hypocrisy | mediarosa

  • Megalomaniac

    ROFL – I love hypocrisy. So funny!

  • King K

    @49
    If you support them you should be ashamed of what they did.

  • neo/style

    this is impossible

  • neo/style

    my boss will never do such a thing

  • Daemon_ZOGG

    Copyright Enforcement Group letters go through the shredder just as fast as the rest of the BullSh”. junk-mail. };P

  • Pingback: Musings of Wiz » U.S. Copyright Group ‘Steal’ Competitor’s Website

  • Pingback: U.S. Copyright Group steals copyrighted website design | MyCE – My Consumer Electronics

  • Dia

    Didn’t you know? Only things that are sold have copyrights!

  • Anonymous

    Who uses HTML 4.1 Transitional anymore?

    um, XHTML anyone?

  • Liam

    FAIL

  • mmmunf

    Hrm. http://www.copyrightsettlements.info redirects me to the farce.com one?

  • dg100

    Fabulous work, TF, absolutely precious!
    :D

  • HateTheHaters

    If you want to give these idiots a headache sign them (subpoena@dgwlegal.com) up to every mailing list you can find… ;)

  • BUMPULG

    OH CRAP!!! MY ANUS IS LEAKING AGAIN!

  • Pingback: The U.S. Copyright Group (USCG) responsible foGroup steals copyrighted website design - Digit's Technology Discussion Forum

  • Stan

    TorrenLeech is under attack !

    2010-07-31 – TRACKER DOWN

    We have an ongoing DoS attack on our tracker, which results in our tracker appearing offline. We are trying to block it, and will keep you posted with updates.

  • Pingback: U.S. Copyright Group ‘Steal’ Competitor’s Website (Ernesto/TorrentFreak) | Access 2 Art

  • Pingback: Anti-P2P lawyers accused of copyright hypocrisy « Gyrovague's Raves

  • Anonymous

    function checkmyformb() {
    var missing = ”;
    if(document.getElementById(‘formb_password’).value == ”) missing += ‘ – Password\n’;
    if(document.getElementById(‘formb_password’).value == ‘Password’) missing += ‘ – Password\n’;
    if(document.getElementById(‘formb_case’).value == ”) missing += ‘ – Case Number\n’;
    if(document.getElementById(‘formb_case’).value == ‘Case #’) missing += ‘ – Case Number\n’;
    if(!document.getElementById(‘formb_age’).checked) missing += ‘ – Age Verification\n’;
    if(missing.length > 0) {
    alert(‘The following are missing from your form:\n’+missing);
    return false;
    is still copied

  • Pingback: U.S. Copyright Group caught stealing competitor’s code

  • Pingback: U.S. Copyright Group caught stealing competitor’s code | Internet News for Geeks

  • Been Here Before

    Fun as it may be to further villify these predatory companies by pointing out instances of hypocrisy, it’s still just tu quoque, a distraction which has no bearing on the cases they’re making against people…not that those cases are necessarily justified – it’s just that the hypocrisy of the company w.r.t. its website doesn’t enter into it.

  • Pingback: U.S. Copyright Group caught stealing competitor’s code » Shai Perednik.com

  • Pingback: U.S. Copyright Group caught stealing competitor’s code | ThaiDC.com

  • fkfkf

    i thought lawyers had to do new work for each client. If they billed for the website it’s fraud.

  • cundare

    Obvious question: If different entities put up the two sites, why do they share the same phone #? That doesn’t add up, ya know.

  • Anonymous

    Unfuckingbelievable. Lawyers are pure scum!

  • Pingback: Anonymous

  • expublicus

    ‘…kill all the lawyers…’

  • Pingback: Quick & Dirty (20) « Journal du Hack

  • Pingback: Interesting read for Torrent users... - GT-R Register - Official Nissan Skyline and GTR Owners Club forum

  • Pingback: Anti-P2P lawyers accused of copyright hypocrisy | streetvisuals

  • Pingback: Anti-P2P lawyers accused of copyright hypocrisy | Bhaskar News Online

  • Pingback: Anonymous

  • Pingback: Soniq.org Links » U.S. Copyright Group caught stealing competitor’s code

  • Pingback: links for 2010-08-04 | Leefe rates the world...

  • Sandy

    I have received one of these letters suing me….Are you saying it’s a scam

  • Pingback: UniversoTek » Los cazadores de piratas también son piratas

  • BTGuard - BitTorrent Anonymously

NewsBits

Even more news...

  • 404 Fail: Six Strikes’ Piracy Alternatives Go Missing

    After years of negotiating and planning the “six strikes” copyright alert system finally saw the light...

  • Google Doesn’t Believe Kim Dotcom is Real

    Those who enter Kim Dotcom into Google’s search box will get millions of results. Still, Google...

  • Nintendo’s Miyamoto: Piracy More Concerning Than Used Games Market

    In an interview with Computer and Video Games, Nintendo designer Shigeru Miyamoto says that his company...

  • Monitoring BitTorrent Activity on a Network Using WireShark

    As all readers should know by now, BitTorrent activity is public and can be easily logged...

  • The Pirate Bay Suffers Downtime

    The Pirate Bay is not responding at the moment and most proxies appear to be down...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

PopularArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.