TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

We’re No Rogue Site: PutLocker Responds To Hollywood

Last week Paramount Pictures’ identified five leading cyberlocker services as prime targets for future action. One of the services, UK-based PutLocker, has spoken with TorrentFreak refuting claims that it is some kind of “rogue site”. Another spotlighted file-hosting site, Wupload, has taken drastic action in the last few hours by announcing it has left the file-sharing business.

It’s becoming increasingly clear that the Hollywood studios aren’t going to be satisfied with the shutdown of Megaupload alone. They want more.

“We continue to make criminal referrals,” said Paramount Pictures’ Alfred Perry during a conference last week.

Perry, Paramount’s vice president for worldwide content protection, went on to list five other hosting services in the MPAA’s spotlight – FileServe, MediaFire, Wupload, PutLocker and Depositfiles. At the weekend MediaFire insisted that they aren’t run by some criminal gang and today we’ve spoken with Putlocker to get their take on Paramount’s statement.

“In any other industry, a person making this type of statement could be sued for libel. Funny how that works,” PutLocker Operations Officer Adrian Petroff told TorrentFreak.

“PutLocker takes a strong stand against copyright infringement and in the past year and a half we have taken down hundreds of thousands of infringing files and blocked the accounts of hundreds of repeat offenders,” adds Petroff. “PutLocker always cooperates with copyright holders and law enforcement agencies at home and abroad to uphold the rights of content producers and distributors alike.”

In common with competitor RapidShare, PutLocker says it’s going the extra mile to tackle infringement. Like its Swiss counterpart, PutLocker also has a program to monitor external sites for abuse of their service and aggressively takes down files that contravene the company’s terms of use.

PutLocker, a service with offices in the UK, has only been existence for a little over 18 months but during that time it has grown quickly. From a standing start the service had reached around 800,000 visitors a day by early January 2012, and like many other comparable services benefited greatly in traffic terms after Megaupload was shut down. It now brings in around 1.6 million visitors every day.

Petroff told us that the company exists to enable legitimate users to quickly and easily upload large files and access them anywhere in the world, filling a gap in the market that not even GMail with its 25mb attachment limit can match.

“Less than 2% of the files uploaded to our servers are flagged as infringing which is a strong indication of the amount of legitimate usage we provide to the online community,” he told us.

Another of the issues that has become a hot topic since January is the rewarding of cyberlocker users when others download their content. Despite Megaupload discontinuing its program many months ago, the fact that it once had such a program is referenced heavily in the US government indictment. On February 1st 2012 (and in common with many other similar services) PutLocker also shut down its affiliate program.

Other sites in the crosshairs of the MPAA are Wupload and FileServe. Today we can report that following the Paramount statement on Friday, both file-hosting services have taken the most drastic of actions.

“All sharing has been disabled,” Wupload said in an announcement. “Wupload is not a file sharing site. If you uploaded a file, only you can download it and it can’t be shared with anyone else.”

wupload

Having temporarily blocked 3rd party sharing in January, FileServe appeared to re-enable the feature, only to switch it off again in the last few hours. As of now, it appears that FileServe too are no longer in the file-sharing business. (read more here on Wupload and FileServe)

FileServe

Petroff told TorrentFreak that these are worrying developments.

“Who needs SOPA when a studio exec can make a wish/hit list and sites ‘voluntarily’ shut down?” he questioned.

From our discussions with PutLocker it seems clear that while maintaining existing popular features such as not throttling free users or putting limits on the number of files people can download, the service intends to move onwards and upwards with upgrades and additions.

“We are currently in a middle of a major site overhaul which will introduce a wide array of unique features that will help PutLocker secure itself as a leader in cloud storage and collaborative sharing platform for regular users, and businesses alike.”

“At the same time, we are always looking forward to working with content producers, distributors and their agents to diversify their distribution strategies and uphold intellectual property rights,” Petroff concludes

Related Posts

Previous Post | Next Post

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Don-Dilly/1624894683 Don Dilly

    I find it interesting that with the fact the whole notion of criminal liability that is based purely on the unproven (and shaky) case against megaupload there seems to be a rush to spread FUD and scare other sites into closing down well ahead of the mega case.

    Whats the rush guys ? I can only summize even the MAFIAA with hindsight see the very real chance of the mega case collapsing and have pulled out all the stops in an attempt to cause as much collateral damage to locker sites before that happens.

    • Lord of the Files

      Collateral damage indeed. Anyone using sites like Megaupload to freely share all the materials, textures, brushes, alphas, models, etc which they’ve created are not the only ones getting screwed. All the artists out there who want to download and use them got screwed too. I only bring it up because I encountered someone on a popular CG forum complaining they couldn’t download a bunch of free materials for the art project they were working on because all the links had died. The fallout is wider than most people realize I think, and it looks as if things are only going to get worse for legitimate users thanks to the copyright industry and their governmental minions. Have to admit though, they’re wielding fear as a weapon most effectively. Getting sites like Wupload to voluntarily shut themselves down or radically change the services being offered must be a pretty big coup for those working towards controlling life, the universe, and everything.

      • Sjococo

        Wielding fear as a weapon is what? Right, it is an act of terror.
        So that makes the movie and music industrie, MPAA and RIAA what? Right, terrorist organisations. And that opens posibilities…

        • NATASHA

          @Rob8urcakes my Ćo-wôrker’s śister makes $64/hôûr ôń the internet. Śhe has bęęn ûnęmṗlôyęd ḟôr ḟivê mônths bût last monṫh hêr Ćhêck was $17661 jusṫ workińg oń ṫhê ińṫêrńêṫ ḟor a ḟew hours. Here’s ṫhe siṫe ṫo read more..MakeCash2.com

    • Selfjustice

      Oh guess who is rogue?

      We can not afford such a disease.

      Paramount Pictures! What do they do to the society? Oh ya raping kids since they are a pack of pederasts!

      We shall kill them all one by one until the parasitic infestation is cured. Oh ya, and let’s torch their headquarters and their studios. Then we will invite everyone to dance on the ashes.

      What do you mean this would be illegal?

      To be illegal they must be a law and some justice. There is no law and no justice therefore everything goes.

      Not our choice, their.

    • Anonymous

      my buddy’s sister earned $19259 past month. she is working on the laptop and got a $330800 home. All she did was get fortunate and put in action the tips explained on this link>>> http://makecash11.blogspot.in

    • Anonymous

      my neighbor’s step-sister brought home $20864 a week ago. she has been making cash on the internet and bought a $519900 home. All she did was get lucky and apply the advice exposed on this link>>> http://dealincash.blogspot.com/

    • Anonymous

      my classmate’s mom earned $21050 a week ago. she works on the internet and bought a $507700 condo. All she did was get lucky and follow the information leaked on this web page… http://onlinemoneycampaign.blogspot.in/ 

  • Anonymous

    MAFIAA MUST DIE !
    Censor the bastards from ever getting into your Wallet and do not be a hypocrite about this.
    No Money Ever ! MAFIAA lick a dog’s Ass.

    • Myself

      “No Money Ever ! MAFIAA lick a dog’s Ass.”

      Hey now be civilized please.. what did that harmless dog ever do to you :P

    • Caladol1

      totally agree on a MAFIAA put down, let it die for the greater good.

  • Pingback: Anonymous

  • http://torrentfreak.com/ Rob8urcakes

    Oh my! It looks as though the MAFIAA still have to keep bribing politicians in order to keep their out-of-date and defunct business model intact, despite the fact that a VAST majority of “content recipients” object profusely to being attacked by the recording and movie industries we supported with hard cash for a century.

    I detect the dying throes of a desperate MAFIAA which will soon succumb to the will of the People if they continue attacking us and our preferred services such as Megaupload, Fileserve, etc.

    Time to vote with our heads folks – not only in political elections but with our cash too. So be careful what you buy and where you buy it.

    • Anonymous

      We can certainly say that Hollywood act like Terrorists by spreading fear across the market. That is true when they aim to scare LAWFUL suppliers. I have seen this before in past years and what counts is to follow the law, to stay mad, to know who you enemy is, and to bitch at them all across the Internet.

      Kim Dotcom sure show how to do it right, He is in a position that few would want to be in but he behaving as one would hope.

      I am sure sad to see FileServe close their sharing service when I have used them much before. I just hope HotFile has no plans to do likewise when my friend has still to download her photo slideshow that I uploaded. The 29MB of this file was too big for even Yahoo Mail’s 25MB limit.

      Well a sad day but I am not too upset about this. The public have a market demand and all the time that need exists some company will always step in to make a profit. My main concern is that if these front line service shut down then I can name a few cloud storage services that could well follow.

  • Asdf

    Hollywood = Cock suckers paradise.

  • Liquidlickers

    Let’s be honest, the new laws actually are quite effectively destroying pirate sites. As ACTA will be definitely forced next year, we can say goodbye to Internet anonymity (which has been a bullshit the whole time).

    • Fredrika

      > “Let’s be honest, the new laws actually are quite effectively destroying pirate sites.”

      This article is not about pirate sites, it’s about fully legal bitlockers. Why you chose to be dishonest, when you say one shouldn’t is beyond me. But it is hypocrisy.

      > “As ACTA will be definitely forced next year..”

      This is news to me? Acta will fall as soon as one party refuses to sing it, and that is most likely scheduled to happen later this spring in EU.

      > “..we can say goodbye to Internet anonymity (which has been a bullshit the whole time).”

      That’s ignorance talking. It’s impossible to stop anonymity on the Internet without shutting down the entire Internet completely.

      • Arzak

        I doubt there will be any anonymity when the roll out IPv6. One modem. One mobile device. One setup box. One IP for the whole lifetime. In package deals they will even “look” the same if you are at the same provider for your cable, modem and cellular. For the media machine lords, the current dynamic IPv4 trickery is soon to be gone. All the US cable and cellular companies (70% of the net) want to roll out IPv6 within 2 years. There is no escape.

        • Anyone

          vpn will still work to hide your IP even with IPv6

        • MadAsASnake

          IP V6 won’t do a thing. Even if you can identify the exact device (and ISP logging was never designed for this) it still cannot tell you who was sitting at the keyboard.

        • Anonymous

          Use tor and be happy.

        • http://twitter.com/icanhazsake Ninja

          No escape from ipv6 which is a better technology indeed. But from the MAFIAA there will always be a route around ;)

    • Anonymous

      It’s only been bullshit cos you don’t know how to use it correctly.

    • Anonymous

      By “new laws” you don’t mean SOPA and PIPA,do you?

      “Perhaps” ACTA will similarly be forced next year. “Perhaps” not. If enough people take their heads out of their asses, ACTA will instead be final proof that the political hacks who have who have sponsored it need three hundred million new clients.

  • Guest

    “In any other industry, a person making this type of statement could be sued for libel. Funny how that works,” PutLocker Operations Officer Adrian Petroff told TorrentFreak.

    So what keeps them from it? Bloody sue them!

    • MadAsASnake

      Good question. Although sueing for libel would’t solve the corrupt DOJ question.

  • Guest

    That leaves Depositfiles. Well RBN?

  • Telezarz

    Fuck Wupload, Fuck Fileserve ! Just…Fuck em both !
    They just cut their sharing system without any informations, without telling their users !
    Nowadays, the ways of communication online are more than easy, Facebook, Twitter, just to tell these two.
    They havnt even think of display a signal like “Our sharing service will be over on [date here], save you files now” . Nooooo of course not !

    And even worse, a lot of people bought premium account, they will never get a refund, nothing….

    That shows that they dont even DESERVE to be use and REMEMBERED !

    Fuck you Wupload and Fileserve, we will NOT miss you and we will surely FORGOTTEN !

    • Mental Extension

      You’re wrong. FileServe fucked up, but Wupload warned their users about the removal of their affiliate program long before they shut it down, and they kept paying out every cent they owed to their users long after the payout deadline. Wupload were the only ones who did it right. Maybe get your facts straight next time?

      • Telezarz

        Did I talk about their affiliate program ? No.
        Im talking about the sharing service only.
        Wupload havnt warned their users that they’ll cut it. They did it just in few hours.
        Maybe you should read my comment from the begining to the end next time ?

      • LOL87

        At least wupload didnt start mass-banning accounts and deleting files like fileserve did. Even if they did disablew sharing, they still allow you to get your files.

      • Xxvinal77xx

         Fact is. They didnt.

    • Anonymous

      You’re still wrong: they deactivated file sharing suddenly, but you can still get your own files back. At least, that’s what it reads.
      Of course, if you paid because of the file sharing feature, you still don’t get your money back. But a “save your files now” notice was unnecessary since you can still recover them.

    • Guest

      Fileserve has refused to answer any of my emails for a refund of my premier account which started on 2/04/2012.No matter how many times I have asked for the account to be cancelled.I was a fool to pay my account and extended it to two years before it was due.I expected them to to honour their policy of refunding in 7 days which they do not seem to honour so I am stuck with something I can’t use.

      • Sliuszdfhfg

        so did you tell them you will take it up with consumer affairs????

  • Timo

    This is getting so ridiculous… When the people will start to realize that they don’t own nothing anymore and every move they make is under control.. man oh man..i can’t wait for that day. As for you guys in the USA, WTF? I mean WTF? Take a step back and look at the $hit that is going on with your country (preety soon you will be the newest Facist of the century). I’m not even an American and I get angry over what this companies that have more right that you can do with the laws. Look at the most commented article on TF.. START USING THAT BRAIN AND STOP WATCHING SO MUCH TV. GET REAL!

    PS: If the EU tries to do this stuff (after they made a LAW against this), believe me that the $hit hits the fan.. big time.

    PSS: Why MAFIAA sing the song that they’ve won agains MegaUpload? And since when is that if you get arrested or someone takes you to court, you are guilty of the charges before the judge(s) clears it out?

    • TImo

      sorry for the typos – sleepy..

    • Anonymous

      and now the UK has upped it’s citizen surveillance, even though that is supposedly against EU rules. mind you, according to the UK home secretary, law enforcement agencies will only be looking at who contacted who, not at what was said. yeah, right! they must think everyone is as fucking stupid as they are!

      • Mwhahaha

        It hasn’t upped it yet. It’s proposing to up it. If you disagree with it, get off your ass and make your complaints known rather than assuming it’s all done and dusted then sit there being bitter. Help fight it now!

  • Inigomate_chat

    So is putlocker good or is it runned by the government?

    • Bloaxor

      On the outside it looks pretty identical to Mediafire, though I haven’t downloaded nor signed up for an account.

      The only “this is what we offer you” difference seems to be that the files can be up to 1 GB, and not 200 MB.
      Speeds “might” be faster judging by a screenie on the page, too.

      • Bloaxor

        ^ I’m with stupid

        If we’re talking ABSOLUTELY honestly, then why would it even matter?
        Because if we’re talking about plain file dumping, it looks like a fine place. And I doubt you’d get in trouble for that.

  • Anonymous

    i say again. when are the various web sites, be they search engines, file hosts, streaming or sellers going to realise that if they want to continue open and doing business, they have to amalgamate and put forward a consolidated challenge to what the entertainment industries are doing. if there isn’t some sort of joint effort, these different types of site may just as well pack up and piss off! doing as ‘Wupload’ have done, ie just giving up, is admitting they were doing wrong, that they have no faith that they were doing right and no guts!!

    • Mwhahaha

      Gotta agree with you there. If MU could make money off pirated downloads, why can’t the studios make money that way too.

      Oh wait, it’s not *enough* money for them is it?

      Greedy little shits.

      • Xxvinal77xx

         Exactly!!! These overpaid artists, actors, extras, whatever, dont need that shit, if they wanna make movies, music, whatever else, they should enjoy doing it and spreading there art around.. whats with these motherfuckers who demand 6-7 mil a movie? who the fuck do they think they are…. Like Maynard James Keenan said, “Learn to swim” hopefully its coming soon…

  • http://profiles.google.com/orfetheo Orfeas Theofanis

    So we have this amazing tool, The Internet, which we can use to upload our photos/videos/music/content and share it with hundreds of people at a time and at almost no cost, and they won’t let us do it.
    Close down all the cyberlockers.
    Close down all torrent sites.
    Next step: Close down The Internet, it’s too sketchy!

    How can people in America put up with that?
    Control your government, vote for new people, vote for the pirate party or whatever! Someone who understands what the people want, and knows what Freedom (with capital F) is!!

    • Bloaxor

      Let the heads roll?

    • karthur

      Why do you people feel you have the right to have access to something that someone else created, that they charge money for, for free? Logic much? You have no right to Hollywood/corporate American culture. Make your own damn culture, and then give it away for free if you are so butt-hurt about American corporations protecting their IP. What gives you the right to steal something and then post it for millions of people to download via the internet?

      No one wants your god damn photos/videos/music/content. What they want is the latest hollywood blockbuster, or music album. That is what these infringement platforms (cyberlockers) thrive on. This is what drives subscriptions/users/rewards payouts, not your god damn home movies.

      • Fredrika

        > “Why do you people feel you have the right to have access to something that someone else created, that they charge money for, for free?”

        Because that has been the norm in society for over a 150 years. Free access to culture on a commercial scale without any regards to the opinion of the creator or copyright holder. That fact that some entrepreneur wishes to make money on something that he sells has no relevance to that whatsoever. To make sales is his responsibility alone, unless you have a problem with the free market and advocate a planned economy?

        > “You have no right to Hollywood/corporate American culture.”

        Since society doesn’t work in that direction, that everything is forbidden until you have a right to it, people do not need any right to Hollywood/corporate American culture.

        > “..if you are so butt-hurt about American corporations protecting their IP.”

        They protect with fascist methods, not giving a damn about due process and collateral damage. That is obviously not ok in civilized countries. Are you saying you support fascism?

        > “What gives you the right to steal something and then post it for millions of people to download via the internet?”

        You seem confused. Nothing is stolen. What is posted on the Internet is information describing physical patterns of people’s property, that they themselves own.

        > “What they want is the latest hollywood blockbuster, or music album. That is what these infringement platforms (cyberlockers) thrive on.”

        No court has found their activities to be infringing, so please stop being a criminal and resorting to libel.

        • karthur

          just an opinion! I was not singling out any service in particular.

        • Fredrika

          > “just an opinion! I was not singling out any service in particular.”

          Aah, so it’s ok then to run around claiming that fully legal services that no judicial system has found to be infringing on anything, are doing just that?

        • karthur

          I made no such claim, these services can be used for infringing copyright, I did not mean to say they are in of themselves infringing, so apologies if I was not clear. As you said it needs to be proven in court either way.

        • Fredrika

          > “I made no such claim, these services can be used for infringing copyright, I did not mean to say they are in of themselves infringing, so apologies if I was not clear.”

          Your exact words were “That is what these infringement platforms (cyberlockers) thrive on”. Unless you have a serious problem using proper English, that is a clear accusation that the “platforms (cyberlockers)” themselves are infringing.

          But then you know now that they are not infringing and that they are considered fully legal according to the judicial system, and that the courts have already decided that their current mode of operations regarding takedowns is enough.

        • karthur

          My English is not great, I know. I think I’m going to start a Cyberlocker then!

    • PelouzeTF

      I’m sure there are many people who like to share photo’s, video, software etc that “they have created”. And for them, these services are obviously valuble.

      There are also many people who like to share materials that they have not created, sometimes for profit. Value there too, dishonest but, valueble.

      Of course people like a service where there is no cost to consume the materials just as much as a company/person will like a business model where manpower to operate the website is low and all the costs for materials on it are born by someone else with precious little responsibility on their part.

      So who are the greedy parties that have bought it to this ? (1) The website when they willfully ignore the realities of their business and incentivise /reward users (2) those users who upload materials they don’t own (for profit or not) or (3) the companies/people that spend money to create the content ?

      I’m going with a combination of 1 and 2.

      • Fredrika

        > “There are also many people who like to share materials that they have not created, sometimes for profit. Value there too, dishonest but, valueble.”

        That there’s something dishonest about sharing material that you have not created is your personal subjective opinion, nothing more. In reality, several different business models are built up around that very concept. Among others, all the publishing industries. Obviously there’s nothing dishonest whatsoever about sharing information describing the physical patterns of your own property, that you own.

        > “Of course people like a service where there is no cost to consume the materials..”

        As has been explained to you several times before, in reality, where the rest of us lives, there has never been any cost for consuming the materials. It has always been free.

        > “So who are the greedy parties that have bought it to this ? (1) The website when they willfully ignore the realities of their business and incentivise /reward users (2) those users who upload materials they don’t own (for profit or not) or (3) the companies/people that spend money to create the content ?”

        Obviously #3 is the greedy party, the weak failed entrepreneurs that refuse to operate on the free market, that demands a legislative monopoly that intrudes into and parasites on people’s property, and that demand fascist measures to guarantee their monopoly. Party #1 and #2 do nothing else than operate according to the free market rules.

        This has also been explained to you before, but you seem to have a severe problem understanding the concept of greed, parasitism and the free market.

        > “I’m going with a combination of 1 and 2.”

        That’s because you ignore reality, and advocate against the free market, and also encourage parasitic behaviour.

        • Cybrid

          Fredrika: I love your comments.

        • Fredrika

          > “Fredrika: I love your comments.”

          Is this the Show your love for Fredrika-day, or what!? =D You’re the fourth one in less than 24 hours..

          But love is good so keep on loving, and i will do my best to deserve it! =P

  • Pingback: FileServe and Wupload Exit The File-Sharing Business | TorrentFreak

  • Hammond

    The owner of Wupload was related to Filesonic.

    Fileserve = Filejungle, Uploadstation

    Filepost = Hotfile

    Filesonic and Fileserve were the worst “offenders”. I am sure the copyright mafia is on the trail of the owners.

    Shutting down and supposedly destroying evidence might actually land the owners in jjail.

    • Anonymous

      Evidence is only “evidence” once you’ve been sued.
      They have every right to destroy their own property at the moment.

      • Dave

        Anon is correct. One cannot be prosecuted for “destroying evidence” when there is no pending criminal or civil action.

    • Anonymous

      They would never ever “destroy” “evidence”! They would only shut down and delete unnecessary files in the “normal” course of business. If there was enough balls and value in the business to cover the court cost of a defense that would hold the accusers to every constitutional and procedural burden of proof, such a public case just might cost the copyright monopolies a large chunk of their current taken-for-granted previledges.

  • study

    MafRIAA works only if there is Fear, right? Mafia needs fear to take down internet, mafia needs money, mafia want simple users fear. But I think mafia will fail…

    • Mwhahaha

      I think they’re more into using bribery to pass their own laws currently.

  • Nick

    Right now democrats and republicans are for controlling the internet. As long as we are in a depression hollywood can claim they are losing jobs by having illegal uploads etc.

  • Gavpowell

    I must admit, I wondered last week why Putlocker hadn;’t been targeted yet – it’s almost identical to Mega in every way – streaming video, large file hosting, upgrade to premium etc. I dread to think what will happen if the industry wins the Mega case – people will be running to the hills.

  • Mutu02polotau

    Let’s all move to TurboBit.net
    It is strategically a very good move imo.

    • http://profiles.google.com/zerianis10 Christopher Kidwell

      Not when they block all U.S. users.

  • Aadizcx

    I love how Wupload’s banner says “the ultimate experience”
    Ah, the irony

    • Bloaxor

      WUpload.com – THE ULTIMATE EXPERIENCE
      Of hosting your own files, for yourself, and only.

      • Guest

        ha ha ha

        I won’t say “fuck you Fileserve and Wupload”. I will continue to say “Fuck you MAFIAA”

    • Mwhahaha

      What, they mean it’s the final thing you do before you get hauled off to jail?

      (Word play eh? Can’t beat it)

  • Jon7272

    ill just say why is there still online bussineses still in the uk and the usa

  • Anonymous

    and who here thinks the entertainment industries are worried whether any site they accuse of being ‘rogue’ is actually ‘rogue’? they are after shutting down as many sites as they possibly can, particularly file hosting, cyber locker and torrent sites. anyone that thinks cloud services wont be next are living in dream land. wait and see!!

    • Zig

      ‘file hosting’ and ‘cyberlocker’ sites ARE ‘cloud’ services. There is very little difference between sites like PutLocker and MegaUpload and others like Dropbox or YouSendIt and what difference there is has no bearing on legality (or rather, lawfulness – infringement is STILL only a civil issue, not criminal).

      • Zig

        …oh, and all of those services are very widely used for perfectly legitimate and lawful purposes.

        • Anonymous

          are there any file hosting sites that aren’t used for both legitimate and, perhaps, non-legitimate purposes? do you think these fuckers care? look at Mega. prime example.

        • Zig

          @Anonymous

          Absolutely. They don’t care if it’s a successful legally and lawfully run business. If it stands in the way of their total control of information flow then it must be destroyed.

      • Anonymous

        was referring to the likes of amazons offering

        • Zig

          Yes I know, but the purpose of Amazon’s offering is identical to any of the ‘cyberlockers’ – to allow remote access to files put there by an account holder. :)

  • Anonymous

    Should be rather interesting to see how that all turns out.
    Surf-Tools.tk

  • Nope

    The cyberlockers need to stop bitching out and band together and sue Paramount / MPAA / RIAA for impacting their business models and spreading abundant lies.

  • http://twitter.com/happyizpunjai happy

    Who gave industry the right to decide what is rouge and what isn’t. Retroshare all the way.

  • Luckyd2039

    When are they going to shut down my local library? I can get any DVD or CD released from my library and make copies of them. I can go to REDBOX and pay $1 and make copies of DVD’s and Video Games.

    I don’t need filelockers or the the internet.

    • PelouzeTF

      Of course you can, that has existed since media could be easily recorded on home devices. Doesn’t make it right but ultimately its “small scale”.

      The impact of copying something and sharing between a few friends is a far cry from sharing with millions.

      • Anonymous

        Yeah, but people really really like this “sharing with millions” thing. They call it reclaiming the Public Domain that was stolen by crooked politicians when they slipped in the one hundred year copyright term.

      • Fredrika

        > “Doesn’t make it right but ultimately its “small scale”.”

        In reality, it’s the other way around, there’s nothing that makes it wrong.

        > “The impact of copying something and sharing between a few friends is a far cry from sharing with millions.”

        That there is an impact on something does not mean that it is wrong. Secondly, there’s no scientific evidence whatsoever to support the fabricated thesis that sharing with millions has any negative impact on society, creators, culture or the content industry’s current record revenues.

        • Treynity

          This file sharing has been going on for years and I haven’t seen a drop in the box office sales or dvd rents, so its a lie that it negatively affects them. Besides, a bootleg is never the quality of an official release so people will buy, rent, view it on various streams of distribution anyway. The television and cable networks thrive off of a free public platform supported solely on advertising revenue so a shift in motion picture via internet based upon a free public advertising model is the answer which I forecast will be their future and this current climate of fascist tactics is the last gasps of a dinosaur in the throes of death. RIP paramount.

    • Megaaupload

      Now they are trying to ban the sale/transfer of used books/movies/games.
      So they probably will shut it down :)

  • karthur

    oh please, seriously Putlocker? I only see infringing links to Putlocker, where are all these mythical links to legit content? Just do a search on Google. Where are the non infringing links?!

    • karthur

      While I’m at it, what is your relation to Sockshare? Same IP, same site design. I can only find infringing links to that as well. Most likely we will see both of these disappear.

    • Rogers

      Legit content can mean something was uploaded and a link was sent to 1 or more people in private. Just because google didn’t index it, doesn’t mean it does not exist.

      • karthur

        Yeah? well then they should turn off public sharing, and make it a private service? Why don’t they do that??!!?! oh I know why.

        • Kr0nZ

          so then it would be just like fileserve and wupload, only you, the uploader, will be able to download your own files

          you cant have a service that only lets people you share the link with able to download, because that link can be put anywhere. You cant know if the person accessing a link is the one you originally shared a link with, even if you password protect a link that password can just be passed around with the link

        • PelouzeTF

          We all know why. If you create something, its painfully obvious why they operate the way they do.

          If you don’t create and just download shit for free, then apparently, the MPAA, RIAA etc are tying to destroy “your” freedom of speech and civil liberties. LOL

        • Fredrika

          > “We all know why. If you create something, its painfully obvious why they operate the way they do.”

          They operate the way they do because they are successful entrepreneurs that seek profit according to the free market rules, in a fully legal manner.

          Do you have a problem with entrepreneurs that operate according to the free market rules, in a fully legal manner?

          > “If you don’t create and just download shit for free, then apparently, the MPAA, RIAA etc are tying to destroy “your” freedom of speech and civil liberties.”

          No one has ever claimed that, so that is an extremely dishonest straw-man argument you just put forward.

          In reality, Mpaa, Riaa, etc are trying to destroy free speech and several other human rights, with the legislative countermeasures that they demand, to stop something that no evidence proves is even harmful in the first place.

          So the only reason you laugh is because you seem completely incapable of understanding what people actually are saying in the first place, and because you don’t have a problem with fascism.

        • http://profiles.google.com/zerianis10 Christopher Kidwell

          Peloser is at it once again, missing the point here that most people have ALREADY paid for the things that they ‘pirate’.

        • PelouzeTF

          @ Christopher Kidwell

          “Peloser is at it once again, missing the point here that most people have ALREADY paid for the things that they ‘pirate’.”

          Really Christopher ?? id love to see the hard unbiased evidence on that.

        • PelouzeTF

          @ Fredricka

          “They operate the way they do because they are successful entrepreneurs that seek profit according to the free market rules, in a fully legal manner.

          Do you have a problem with entrepreneurs that operate according to the free market rules, in a fully legal manner?”

          You’re entitled to your opinion, doesn’t make it fact.

          “No one has ever claimed that, so that is an extremely dishonest straw-man argument you just put forward.”

          Rick Falkvinge just did, on TF no less. There are many other examples.

          So you claiming “No one has ever claimed that” is dishonest.

          “In reality, Mpaa, Riaa, etc are trying to destroy free speech and several other human rights, with the legislative countermeasures that they demand, to stop something that no evidence proves is even harmful in the first place.

          So the only reason you laugh is because you seem completely incapable of understanding what people actually are saying in the first place, and because you don’t have a problem with fascism.”

          I disagree but, you’re entitled to your opinion.

        • Fredrika

          > “You’re entitled to your opinion, doesn’t make it fact.”

          I have not put forward any personal opinion? In reality, where the rest of us lives, no precedent sentencing from any higher court has ruled any cyberlockers current manner of operation to be illegal, therefore it is according to the judicial system considered fully legal successful entrepreneurship that they engage in.

          This is not an opinion, this is a fact regarding how the judicial system actually works. Do you have a problem with the judicial system, or what’s your problem?

          > “Rick Falkvinge just did, on TF no less. There are many other examples.”

          No he did not and there are not. Shall we look at your actual claim once again, so we can see what it was that you falsely claimed?

          > “If you don’t create and just download shit for free, then apparently, the MPAA, RIAA etc are tying to destroy “your” freedom of speech and civil liberties.”

          The only premiss that you mentioned had to be fulfilled for “the MPAA, RIAA etc..//tying to destroy “your” freedom of speech and civil liberties” was this: “If you don’t create and just download shit for free”

          Nor Rick or anyone else has ever claimed that that premiss alone is what equals “tying to destroy “your” freedom of speech and civil liberties”. Therefore your claim was indeed false as it was written.

          > “So you claiming “No one has ever claimed that” is dishonest.”

          Evidently it was not. But the problem seems to be that you do not understand what you yourself actually write, and what it means according to proper use of language.

          > “I disagree but, you’re entitled to your opinion.”

          Again, i have not put forward any opinion? My statements were the following:

          > “In reality, Mpaa, Riaa, etc are trying to destroy free speech and several other human rights, with the legislative countermeasures that they demand..”

          It’s a human right to engage in uncensored unmonitored private communication. This is something that they indeed are currently advocating against. It’s a human right to unhindered send and receive information through any means, and this is also something that they are advocating against. It’s a human right to have due process and be considered innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. This is also something that they advocate against.

          Not giving a damn about all this collateral damage regarding all innocent people, to try to stop the pirates, is text book fascism.

          So that part of my statement was in no way a opinion, it was a fact.

          Moving on, my next claim was the following:

          > “..to stop something that no evidence proves is even harmful in the first place.”

          This was obviously regarding the act of non-profit filesharing, and that also is a fact, not an opinion, that no existing scientific evidence can corroborate it being harmful to neither society, creators, culture or the content industries current record revenues.

          Moving on. The last part of my statement was the following:

          > “So the only reason you laugh is because you seem completely incapable of understanding what people actually are saying in the first place, and because you don’t have a problem with fascism.”

          As has already been proven in the initial part of the comment, regarding what no one has ever said, you do indeed have a problem understanding what people actually are saying. And secondly, you do indeed seem to have no problem with fascist measures to stop something that has never been proven harmful, based on your previous comments where you support these measures.

          Again that part of my comment was not an opinion, it was purely factual.

          Claiming that several facts was opinions, is that really the best rebuttal you can come up with? Seriously?

    • Fredrika

      > “oh please, seriously Putlocker? I only see infringing links to Putlocker..”

      You seem ignorant. There are no infringing links. A link can not be infringing.

      > “..where are all these mythical links to legit content?

      All content is legit. What possibly can be illegitimate is the transference of certain information under certain circumstances. Not the content in itself.

      • karthur

        Pedantic much? You know exactly what I mean, I don’t need to explain it further. You are the ignorant one.

        • Fredrika

          > “Pedantic much?”

          I prefer to stick to the actual facts, something that i see you continuously chose to ignore in your reasoning and arguments.

          > “You know exactly what I mean, I don’t need to explain it further.”

          I know exactly what you mean, but things are not as simple as you seem to believe, at least not according to the law, something you seem to care very little about though.

          > “You are the ignorant one.”

          Pointing out misconceptions and false claims in your arguments does not make one ignorant.

        • Anon

          Karthur will be pwned in 3…2…1

        • http://profiles.google.com/zerianis10 Christopher Kidwell

          The only one ‘pedantic’ here karthur, is you. Why? Because you fail to realize that most, if not almost all, people do not agree with your definitions of various terms.

      • Guest

        Show your love for Fredrika by flagging karthur’s comments. xD

        • Fredrika

          > “Show your love for Fredrika by flagging karthur’s comments.”

          I’m not sure if that the best method, to try to get rid if their weak flawed arguments.. Personally i feel the most loved when people really learn the meaning of my arguments, copy them, and then use them themselves, when battling ignorant pro-copyright trolls. Then i have really made a difference.

          And although i’m not sure i like the like-system, there’s always the possibility to like me. =)

      • Megaaupload

        On some movie sites 99% of the links are putlocker links. You cant really argue that putlocker didnt have alot of illegal content on it.

        • Fredrika

          > “You cant really argue that putlocker didnt have alot of illegal content on it.”

          Yes i can, because content in itself is not illegal. Neither does the mere fact that content is copyrighted mean that it is illegal to host or transfer it.

        • Fredrika

          > “You cant really argue that putlocker didnt have alot of illegal content on it.”

          Yes i can, because content in itself is not illegal. Neither does the mere fact that content is copyrighted mean that it is illegal to host or transfer it.

        • Treynity

          Could you elaborate as to how and why content is not illegal to host or transfer. I understand it this way is that if I bought a dvd and invited my friends over to watch it that is not copyright infringement even though they did not purchase anything or pay to view the movie. Accordingly, if I post the content on the internet and it is viewed is not copyright infringement just because each individual did not purchase as they are in essence the friends in my living room. I would think the problem would be if I distributed it for a fee and didn’t compensate the creator of the content. Am I wrong?

      • Megaaupload

        On some movie sites 99% of the links are putlocker links. You cant really argue that putlocker didnt have alot of illegal content on it.

  • Forest_GS

    It doesn’t take much time to make modifications to a file-sharing site when you have a paid team working on it. I bet the moment Megaupload wins, all the other services will come back. Though I doubt they will do more than what Megaupload does when it reboots.
    Example;
    If Megaupload uses an affiliate program when it comes back, the other sites will see it as safe to use. Though, it will depend on site owners to decide what to do.

  • Guest

    ohhhh you wupload …. you are a disgrace to the internet … you just bend over to get fuck by the industry …

    • Thank You Wupload

      You people at Wupload are a buncho of gutless cowards. Yes, Kim Dotcom is facing racketeering charges that carry a maximum sentence of LIFE BEHIND BARS in the USA. So what?

      You people at Wupload cower in fear while your “supporters” (see comment above) call you disgraceful bend-over clowns.

      We don’t thank you for having the balls to do what you did as long as you did it because you are cowardly douchebags.

    • Fredrika

      > “ohhhh you wupload …. you are a disgrace to the internet … you just bend over to get fuck by the industry …”

      Do you usually blame the victim? It’s obvious that the judicial system won’t protect these legal operations and their entrepreneurs from extortion, so i do understand why some of them, those who have to much connections to US soil, aren’t strong enough to stand up against criminal organisations such as Mpaa and Riaa.

      • http://profiles.google.com/zerianis10 Christopher Kidwell

        The problem is that the legal system is failing to realize that this is nothing different than numerous things that have been declared legal in courts.

        It is legal to loan DVD’s to friends. It is legal to loan CD’s to friends. It is legal to loan games to friends.

        How does it make any goddamned difference when the ‘loan’ is for life or until the person gets tired of the thing in question?

        As I keep on pointing out, the media companies are going to have to realize that it IS possible to compete with free, by offering extra added value. It is just not possible to compete with free when you insist on charging 20-60 dollars for something.

        • dont want to be sheeple

          In Australia it costs $30 for an album and $15 for a single both on cd…
          why would some one pay $15 for a cd with 2 or 3 versions of 1 song when you can download a top 100 list of songs for free, pick the songs you like then buy a blank cd for around $1 and have your own mix of music…..
          I for one do not buy cds’ because I just listen to internet radio but I can understand why kids these days prefer to download stuff for free..
          And this goes for games, music, movies etc…

  • Rod

    When MAFIAA begins to harash you there are two options for you to choose. These cyberlockers chose to run away and to surrender. Other way is to fight back, look what The Piratebay is doing, they never give up, they are sent to jail, they still fight back. That is the way to do it. We all must fight to keep Internet free. Keep on fighting everywhere, whatever it takes. We are at WAR. And we will not loose it!

    • Name1

      TPB is only up and running still because nobody knows the current owner.

      Sites like Wupload can’t be hidden since it’s a company with jobs etc.

      I respect Wupload, they tried to stay online but when it threat become ‘to real’ they had to back down – if I was in their situation I’d rather give up and go to jail for piracy. Regardless if I think it’s right or wrong it’s not worth spending the next 50 years in jail >_<

      TPB will stay online untill they find the owner or "do the megaupload" by sending the FBI to threaten to kill TPB's domain registrar unless they take the domain name offline (which at this rate doesn't seem to crazy of an idea).

      • http://profiles.google.com/zerianis10 Christopher Kidwell

        TPB is overseas and their domain registrars are in countries that do NO business with America. Hard to impossible to ‘do the MegaUpload’ when that is the case, because other foreign countries would give a big middle finger rightly to the United States.

  • Dcjb

    Put locker deletes any infrigmented file when reported acc to T&C

    • karthur

      Not good enough. Please, go Google some Putlocker links and come back and tell me when you found something that doesn’t appear to be infringing.

      • Fredrika

        > “Not good enough.”

        According to the law, that is good enough. Are you saying that you don’t care about due process and what the law says?

        • karthur

          Are you kidding? Notice and Takedown does not work when the volumes are high. It has no impact. If Putlocker implemented some kind of takedown-staydown process then that would be the solution but pretty much impossible with a Cyberlocker service in this form. An infringing service is infringing. Please, take me up on my Google offer, go find a Putlocker link that isn’t infringing. See how long that will take you.

        • Fredrika

          > “Are you kidding?”

          I do not. That’s what the law says. You seem to have a problem with the law?

          > “Notice and Takedown does not work when the volumes are high. It has no impact.”

          Your personal opinion on that matter has no relevance whatsoever regarding what the law says. Accoring to the law it is enough.

          > “An infringing service is infringing.”

          And no courts has found these services to be infringing.

          > “Please, take me up on my Google offer, go find a Putlocker link that isn’t infringing. See how long that will take you”

          There are no infringing links to Putlocker.

        • karthur

          Well I guess the law needs changing doesn’t it? It obviously is not effective when dealing with these issues.

          Look, there may be legit content on Putlocker, in fact there is bound to be. But no matter how I google it. When I do a search for Putlocker links, I have not yet been able to find something that doesn’t appear to be infringing. To me this illustrates that there is a problem that needs to be corrected.

        • Fredrika

          > “Well I guess the law needs changing doesn’t it?”

          Your guesses are not relevant to what law changes that are needed.

          > “It obviously is not effective when dealing with these issues.”

          Just because someone claims that an issue exists, that not make it an issue for everyone else, society or the law.

          > “But no matter how I google it. When I do a search for Putlocker links, I have not yet been able to find something that doesn’t appear to be infringing.”

          How you personally find things to be is irrelevant.

          > “To me this illustrates that there is a problem that needs to be corrected.”

          That is because you do not understand how society works and what criteria that needs to be fulfilled for something to constitute a problem for society in the first place, that needs to be legislatively addressed.

        • karthur

          Your comments and opinions serve absolutely no purpose, and as irrelevant my opinions/comments may be, the exact same thing applies to yours. You appear to really love yourself.

        • Fredrika

          > “Your comments and opinions serve absolutely no purpose..”

          I have not put forward any opinion, i have only pointed out clear misconceptions and false claims that you our forward. The purpose is exactly that, to point out the errors in your arguments.

          > “..and as irrelevant my opinions/comments may be, the exact same thing applies to yours.”

          Since you put forward false claims and misconceptions, and i point out the facts about your misconceptions and false claims, i would say there is some difference in how relevant my posts are.

          > “You appear to really love yourself.”

          If we for a second disregard your Ad Homimen-argument and personal attack, which is a logical fallacy, how you subjectively perceive someone’s love for themselves has no relevance whatsoever.

        • only I can judge me

          Should anyone care about due process and the LAW when clearly the government “don’t”…
          Oh that’s right… the government own the police & military to enforce their own laws and opinions!!!!!!!

      • Kr0nZ

        you mean like this? took about 5 mins, and the irony most links were removed because of infringements.
        How can something that is FREE be removed because of infringement?

        http://www.putlocker.com/file/C9015A6B09563E34

        Now go back to sucking your masters dick

      • Anon

        Blah blah blah , go fuck yourself with a retractable baton.
        No one cares what the fuck you think , so do us all a favour n fuck your self happy kthanksbai

      • Guest

        Wow, Pelouzer, where did you find this new bitch? He seems rather addicted to your man chowder.

        I guess we need to add another synonym for Neostyles.

      • Joey

        You are totally failing to grasp how these services are used. -Of course- you can go onto google and search for famous filmes, music etc. and find links to it on this kind of site, because you knew what to search for because it’s famous. The -other- totally legal use of these sites is people like small, unsigned music artists who use them to distribute their music while saving on bandwidth costs – but you’ll stuggle to find them on google, because you’ve never heard of them, because they’re -small and unsigned-. But hey, what do I know? I’ve only worked in radio for the past few years. I only follow hundreds of up-and-coming unsigned producers and DJs who rely heavily on these services.

      • Madderdan

        well didnt take too much googling ;)

        http://www.piratenz.eu/video-hosts.php?h=45

        for the too lazy to search themselves out there.

  • Orlimente

    “In any other industry, a person could be for . Funny how that works,”

    No shit. I think that just about every time I read news related to this stuff.

    • Orly?

      Haha. Disqus thought that was code.

  • foff

    Oh fuck it all. I enjoyed cyber lockers and used their services. It was a great way to share and get tons of shit but as with all pirate activities it is time to move on. Don’t know what the future will bring but another form or model of sharing will appear.

    • Mwhahaha

      That’s going against the grain of all these ppl claiming lockers are 95% legit. Good to see someone’s being rational, admitting some of these places were basically making money from sharing pirated stuff and some innocent people have been caught in the cross fire.

      I accept loads of people do use these places for legit means. I went on a 3 month tour a while back and uploaded my pictures daily to a cloud service in case I lost the camera. Was very handy, tho I’ve never even bothered retrieving them or deleting them. Offsite back ups, paranoid 8th back ups, some legit content producers giving away things. They all occur on CLs. That accounts for what, about 5% of their traffic previously?

      So anyone who claims that lockers don’t take most of their traffic from movies and music etc are kidding themselves. The affiliate program is by design (either happenstance or intentional) an invite to share pirated stuff that ensures lots of hits.

      Frankly I don’t have that much of an issue with this, other than sharing should be free and not involve cash.

      What I do have an issue is people who scream as loud as possible that these services didn’t tacitly accept what made them most of their money and were thankful for it.

      CL’s were always a nod and a wink operation. If you say otherwise you’re naive or just plain dumb.

      Why all the studios don’t run their own version of a CL with advertising on there I have no idea.

      • foff

        Actually what I don’t understand is why cl’s are caught in the crossfire. There is no legal reason why they have to provide take down tools or delete files. What they should do is provide the ip of the uploader and tell the mafiaa to go after the uploader. Why make it so easy for these fuckers, make them work.

  • grodyfuckers

    Someone with the technical know how, please find the IP addresses that MAFFIA & RIAA are using and burn their servers down

    • fuck them over

      no just take them down and sue them and forget if anyone else have files on there just delete it asap

  • http://twitter.com/icanhazsake Ninja

    @Fredrika: if you keep crushing the trolls like that I’ll have to ask if you wanna be the mother of my kids.

    Ahem, @karthur it’s as she says, no matter what you say it doesn’t matter if the law says otherwise. And it both amuses and concerns me that there are ppl like you advocating more laws when they are not needed. There was a great article these days comparing the MAFIAA to the button guilds in the XVII century demanding for stricter laws and state protection against the ones making buttons from cloth. Just because you feel entitled it doesn’t mean you are.

    • Mwhahaha

      Yep it comes back down the blacksmiths q.

      Do you wish the blacksmiths had stopped cars being mass produced so they could keep making horseshoes.

      No industry should be allowed market protection, esp not one as rich as the media industry who’ve been top and bottom slicing money for decades.

    • Fredrika

      > if you keep crushing the trolls like that I’ll have to ask if you wanna be the mother of my kids.”

      Do i look old enough to be carrying any children!? :D

      But i do appreciate the flattery.. :)

      • Guest

        Well, you do have the joy and the laughter.

      • Cybrid

        Fredrika: I learned alot reading your comments. Please keep up the good work! Internet needs you. Internet needs all of us. I can say with solid evidence that Internet was and is my University. I got all my education from Internet. Internet gave me the required information to open my mind, spirit and ears. We need to protect that for the kids of the future!

        • Fredrika

          > “Fredrika: I learned alot reading your comments.”

          And yet my comments under this article aren’t my best.. =)

          > “Please keep up the good work!”

          Will do!!

          > “Internet needs you. Internet needs all of us.”

          Does all include those fascist entrepreneurs that demand their copyright monopoly intact, regardless of the collateral damage? I’m not so sure..

          > “We need to protect that for the kids of the future!”

          Let’s not rule out the possibility that child bearing goes way down in the future(The episode 2010 of Stargate SG-1 touches on that subject) and that we’ll be forced to master time travel to obtain new children from the past(preferably those who were destined to die in explosive accidents, milliseconds before they exploded, to not alter the course of history, which seems to be serious, just having watched the Family Guy-episode Back to the Pilot) to survive in the future.

        • Fredrika

          > “Fredrika: I learned alot reading your comments.”

          And yet my comments under this article aren’t my best.. =)

          > “Please keep up the good work!”

          Will do!!

          > “Internet needs you. Internet needs all of us.”

          Does all include those fascist entrepreneurs that demand their copyright monopoly intact, regardless of the collateral damage? I’m not so sure..

          > “We need to protect that for the kids of the future!”

          Let’s not rule out the possibility that child bearing goes way down in the future(The episode 2010 of Stargate SG-1 touches on that subject) and that we’ll be forced to master time travel to obtain new children from the past(preferably those who were destined to die in explosive accidents, milliseconds before they exploded, to not alter the course of history, which seems to be serious, just having watched the Family Guy-episode Back to the Pilot) to survive in the future.

    • Tom

      She certainly has a way about going round in circles and boring you to death.

  • Anon

    You everyone here doesn’t understand is the reason fileserve and wupload have stopped their service is simple. The government has stopped playing by the rules and is literally on a witch hunt. No matter how “legal” the sites are, the feds/hollywood are out for blood…. They will cross oceans, jurisdictions and even break laws such as the DMCA law that protects people like Fileserve, Wupload and yes…. MegaUpload.

    They stopped their service because they know it’s a lost battle. That they will be arrested without cause but only “Conspiracies” will be thrown at them, the feds will seize the domains and any other properties/belongings and put them in a local prison awaiting extradition… It’s just not worth it. The battle is lost and there is nothing anyone can do about it. The USA is broke and Hollywood threw money at them to “take care” of this for them like as if they were ordering a hit. The USA gov in this case was the Hitman. When laws don’t protect you anymore.. it’s time to move on and say… “ok, you win….i’m out…. just don’t put me in jail”

    I feel mostly bad for the thousands of people that used the service legitimately and now can’t. Was a good run…. the USA Gov / Hollywood say “The internet is not free…. it belongs to US now” Soon you will all be paying to use the internet… not via ISP but the internet itself..

    This is a very sad day for me as well…. more than you will ever know.

    [Anon]

    • Anonymous

      Of course, we know the mindset: “The steamroller is comming! It’s hopeless! Lie flat and die! Stop thinking,outside the box, it’s scary out there! Don’t do that, the masters wont like that! What you’re saying shall become illegal! You’ll get ten years for thinking that!”

      It’s hopeless, huh? So, how do you like the way these all powerful masters just rammed trough SOPA and PIPA? That particular bit of play by play is recent memory; and, what most of us who actually saw the game remember is that that particular steamroller flattened monopoly row and it wasn’t driven by the usual copyright suspects. No sir! It was driven by that segment of three hundred million American with brains to know and balls to act.

      Your post doesn’t tell us that you’ld like to share useful wisdom. Oh no! It just tells us that you’re a paid up member in the Great New Republic of Eunichsstan and that you’re recruiting new members.

      • Sticks and Stones

        Fool.

        • Anonymous

          Believe it or not, most of us try to take responsible and respectful positions in what we post here…………Then………….You come along…………and………Oh!
          Another Troll………..Wonder why they can’t seem to sring two coherent ideas to support their views…….Do we say, “They’re retards!”……..No sir! We say, “Let me ask him how he would justify copyright as a legal perpetuity without ever recourse to the public domain?…….Perhaps he can explain why one should support a copyright law in which the work puoduct of Original artists are purchased for a pittance by corporate distributors who then extract enormous unearned profits from everyone else in the society……We say, Maybe this is the Troll who can explain how a democracy can be expected to be a democracy if its Intellectual property is allowed to fall under the exclusive ownership or controll of a corporate oligarchy……Surely, this Troll will explain why the profit opportunity of the few should ever be held to have primacy over the constitutional rights of the many………Like I said…..you come along and…..give us all the benefit of your best answer and…….and…..

          …..you only belch out the word, “FOOL!”……..

          and……Like Moses standing before the burning bush……….We can’t believe the sheer power of your revelation……real shock and awe……You see, most of us have been raised to think that our laws are made by the wisest and best intentiond people among us….but, no……hearing you we understand that if good citizens want better laws they need to break out a bigger bullwhip…….and….we should thank you and every troll we meet for such a revelation………..

      • Anonymous

        sopa pipa was blocked but what about the new trade agreement that is far more reaching and never even went before congress

    • Anonymous

      At least someone got it right in here. Seems the rest of the idiots saying “fuck you fileserve & wupload” are just out for themselves and usually the type that think with their dick instead of their brain.

  • Blah

    I look at cyberlocker links for all manner of content on an assortment of blogs and forums every day and have never seen a single link listed for copyrighted content on Putlocker. When Paramount put out their list of rogue sites, my first thought on seeing Putlocker on the list was: “Who?”.

    • http://profiles.google.com/zerianis10 Christopher Kidwell

      Same with me. I didn’t even know that Putlocker existed at all until this article. Neither did my friends whom I asked.

    • http://profiles.google.com/zerianis10 Christopher Kidwell

      Same with me. I didn’t even know that Putlocker existed at all until this article. Neither did my friends whom I asked.

  • Anonymous

    We <3 PutLocker!

  • Guest of a Guest

    PutLocker is UK based? Cool…

    Nice to seem some Brits sac up and not cave to the MPAA. I say good job to the staff of PutLocker.

    I am American and I am sick of the “Team America: World ‘Piracy’ Police” dog and pony show. There is actual crime going on world wide; dudes like me getting music and movies from some server that sitting on another sovereign nation’s soil is NOT anywhere in the top 25,000 or so on the priority scale.

    As for the IP rights… I buy the movies and music that is worth owning. I steal the rest and sample what it new via piracy methods. Same for games. MPAA is not stopping me. No halting millions like me.

    So why do the MPAA and those other dick kiss acronym groups extend their actions into other nations and harass overseas? That only give the USA a bully reputation in my view. Most unwarranted. FFS if the MPAA and others where not so ham fisted, they would still damage the standing of those they represent due to the excessive position they take about how they are allowed to ‘enforce’ their IP rights. Add the fact these dolts are clumsy and brutish… What a shit storm!

    Whole issue stinks more then an open bottle of Hai Karate.

  • Srsly

    MegaUpload really needs to win its case so that the proper precedent is be set and this bullshit is finally stopped. MAFIAA needs to get the fuck out of my MediaFire.

  • Anonymous

    PutLocker being in UK is just awaiting to be the next “TV shack” being extradited. Not only the CEO, but their whole staff will face extradition as they’ll be charged under “RICO”. Call me insane for saying this, but this is what’s going to happen. UK will bend over backwards for the US to get them on a plane to face a criminal trial.

    • http://profiles.google.com/zerianis10 Christopher Kidwell

      I doubt it. There is already a big backlash against that happening for the TVShack people, from what I have been reading online.

      • Anonymous

        @Christopher: I beg to differ, especially when the kid is going to be sent on a plane very soon to the US to face trial and potentially 5 years in prison. Having the foreign secretary sign off that it is “OK” for him to be sent off to the US because he didn’t break ANY UK laws, but “broke” US laws is mindboggling and worrying for anyone who does similar business to Putlocker, et al. Fact that they are in the UK makes it even easier to extradite them to the US.

  • Anonymous

    With Cyberlockers there is more hope. Why? Because there are abundant accessible alternative competitors. Don’t like this particular cyberlocker? A new one is born it seems every minute ready to take business from a weaker neighbor who lost sight of who his customers were in the choppy waters. What do we say to the cyberlocker too weak to protect itself and its customers? We say, “Bye-bye!”

    With ISPs it is a completely differrent story. Why? Because, even if you think that there are many ISPs nationally, there are probably NOT many ISPs competing and also available to you within your market. Historically, such businesses have been reguated as MONOPOLIES precisely because it was understood that their customers would be exploited if these businessers were allowed free reign to act in concert.

    Which brings us to the proposed agreements between ISPs and content providers to act in concert against the needs and interests of customers in return for a promised peaceful modus vivendiwith copyright holders These agreements are a fundamental threat to the rights and interests of customers precisely because they represent agreed terms among monopolists and cannot be avoided by the individual customer.

    With these inter-company agreements, however, ISPs and Copyright holders are staking their businesses on the slim hope that they are herding sheep rather than wolverines. Why? Because these agreements are completely lacking in the legal basis in written law that they were meant to have had SOPA and PIPA become law. That would have been a completely different parrallel universe. First, those laws would have put the burden of proving guilt or innocence squarely on the backs of customers. Second, in case customers got past that burden, those laws explicitly gave content distributers and their enforcers immunity from liability.

    So, in the absence of SOPA and PIPA, what do the copyright monopolies have left? They certainly do NOT yet have a venue where custumers are presumed guilty; and, neither do they have a venue where they can, as a matter of written law, claim immunity. Even if these ISPs got a back room promise from Eric Holder’s DOJ to look the other way pending passage of ACTA, such a back room promise could NOT promise actual passage of ACTA against any level of public outrage. (We need context in order to realize fully how important it is to block ACTA.) Neither could such a DOJ promise of wilful blindness bind the civil or apellate judiciary to provide immunity in the absense of ACTA becoming law.

    In conclusion, these ISPs can agree to sodomize their customers as per the instructions of copyright holders, but if their customes turn out to be wolverines instead of sheep, the bill for that pleasure will come due sooner rather than later.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Don-Dilly/1624894683 Don Dilly

    Why did the chicken not discuss crossing the Interstate highway with his mate on the other side ??

    So the feds couldnt turn a ticketable jaywalking misdemeanor most cops wouldnt bother with into a felony conspiracy charge.

  • Desu75

    Rename it to PotLucker. Include cheese dip recipes with every upload.

    • http://twitter.com/Jatthewmoly Matt

      lol i read it like that the first time i found out about it

  • http://www.facebook.com/ValhallaLegend Andrew Lee

    The places shutting down are really jumping the gun here.
    First off Dotcom “HAS NOT” been found guilty of the moronic charges brought against him. Second the case against him as more and more of it comes to light is showing some very serious cracks and breaches that will end in a lawsuit of his and his users favor.

    PL needs to realize in order to make the copyright fuckers happy they will need to do a few things.

    1.Give them 100% site profits.
    2.IP information of all users “Legit users and non” so they can sue them also for more profits from bogus data that would cost more to fight then just to pay to go away.

    Oh well my views stay the same the MPAA and others can go bend over and shove a chainsaw where the sun don’t shine.

    • Anon

      But does it matter when you’re stripped off all your assets, your defence is hindered for months and you’re living in fear that you may be facing 20 years in jail on foreign soil that you’ve never set foot on?

      The US govt (MPAA) works out of the GUILTY until found innocent. Not the other way around (as they may claim)

      There’s no real fight here…It’s a Goliath vs David scenario with the MPAA being the Goliath and Kim (and other hosters) being the David. You going to try throw rocks at Goliath Ver. 2? He’s got a shield up and he will stamp you out.

  • Guest

    laws are made to be broken, or they wouldnt bother.

    stupid laws, are made to be broken repeatedly.

    dont buy hollywood.

    break stupid laws

  • Guest

    I don’t see movies from Hollywood. Overrated industry, overrated and overpaid actors.

  • Anonymous
  • Cybrid

    Yeah, boicot to MAFIAA!!

  • Cybrid

    Yeah, boicot to MAFIAA!!

  • Pingback: Hollywood Continues To Kill Innovation, Simply By Hinting At Criminal Prosecution Of Cyberlockers « waweru.net

  • Malmstein

    RIP Fileserve and all the files on them..
    Freaking ass cowards.

  • Pingback: Links – JimmyLee and Bambi Show – April 7, 2012 » Blog: CNI Radio

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Winter-Reifen/100003386963367 Winter Reifen

    i found your site through search, yours site is a nice and excellent website.. contents are nice.. will grow higher in future

    http://winterreifen.ms/

  • JIN

    FUCK THE POOLICE!

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/YJ2UM3ZGCIFIYKQO662HXDE6Y4 Frank

    my classmate’s step-mother brought in $21074 the previous month. she is getting paid on the internet and bought a $442000 house. All she did was get blessed and put into use the clues made clear on this web site (Click on menu Home more information) http://goo.gl/sXTYs

  • Anonymous

    my buddy’s sister earned $19259 past month. she is working on the laptop and got a $330800 home. All she did was get fortunate and put in action the tips explained on this link>>> http://makecash11.blogspot.in

  • Anonymous

    my buddy’s step-aunt brought in $20413 the prior month. she is making an income on the laptop and bought a $529300 home. All she did was get lucky and use the instructions exposed on this web site… http://cashathom.blogspot.in 

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/Z6W3R73Y6XZ574A47PJMEPIZRE Elisabeth

    my roomate’s half-sister got paid $16388 the prior week. she works on the computer and got a $550400 condo. All she did was get lucky and follow the directions uncovered on this website  (Click on menu Home more information)  http://goo.gl/MvNFc  

  • Guest2

    putlocker does not ban you after 3 dmcas and they dont have md5 blacklist system

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/BXQDLZXFVJDQ5D2PIYZ7LAYLS4 Eileen

    my roomate’s sister-in-law brought in $21042 the previous month. she is getting paid on the internet and bought a $547400 condo. All she did was get blessed and work up the steps laid out on this link  (Click on menu Home more information)   http://goo.gl/6FHwM  

  • Drp985

    This happen once before in 1940′s and again in 1990. It’s called book burning. All those who gave their lives to fight for freedom did so in vain if this is aloud to continue.

  • 1 among the many

    If US don’t want people supposedly violating their copyright laws then they should open their official sites to non US customers. As is, most of the world is banned from access to any of the shows they air. If I can’t watch something, I sure as hell won’t buy it when it goes on sale in my country. They can either accept that though millions use these sites with no ill intention, they ultimately fatten the industry wallets by buying their boxsets, films etc or they can force them all to shut down and lose millions of potential customers and millions in revenue from sale of stock. They can’t have it all their way. Yes, there are people who misuse the sites and pirate downloads but the majority of people want the guaranteed quality as well as the added bonus features that come with legally bought products. So, if these US industries want to keep getting their wallets fat, they need to meet the needs of the people globally. Until they do they will forever be fighting a losing battle. 

  • Vincent Giannell

    Putlocker has been called a piracy haven by MPAA and RIAA again.

  • BTGuard - BitTorrent Anonymously

NewsBits

Even more news...

  • Blu-ray Anti-Piracy Tech Stops Discs and Promotes Purchases

    An anti-piracy system present in all official Blu-ray players since 2012 has received a fresh update...

  • Foxtel Breeds Pirates by Locking Up Game of Thrones

    One of the main reasons why people turn to piracy is the lack of legal alternatives....

  • UK Student Admits Breaching Sony Copyrights With Leak of PS3 SDK

    Last year an Internet user known as El Nomeo leaked version 3.70 of Sony’s Playstation3 SDK...

  • Pirates Can Be Identified Despite Sharing IP Addresses, ISP Claims

    Carrier-Grade Network Address Translation is a network mechanism through which many Internet subscribers can share the...

  • Feds Seize Cash from Major Bitcoin Exchange’s Dwolla Account

    The U.S. Government has taken a significant action against the web’s top Bitcoin exchange by seizing...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

PopularArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.