TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

University Students and Staff Sued For Pirating 50 Cent Movie

A new copyright infringement case filed this week looks set to cause a fresh round of controversy. Copyright trolls from Switzerland, who say they are part of a non-profit organization, are about to shake down thousands of alleged pirates who shared the 50 Cent movie All Things Fall Apart. However, in addition to the usual subscribers of ISPs such as Verizon, Comcast and AT&T, the trolls are trying to obtain the identities of individuals located at universities around the United States.

fallapartEarlier this week and following the filing of dozens of file-sharing infringement lawsuits in the United States, hope came to a court room in Los Angeles as the trolls of Prenda Law finally began to receive their comeuppance.

After their no-show Monday they will all have to appear in court on March 29 to face the music, but in the meantime the U.S. copyright troll epidemic continues, this time in California.

In a fresh lawsuit filed by attorney Boden Davidson on behalf of his client Contra Piracy, it is claimed that thousands of individuals downloaded and shared the 50 Cent movie All Things Fall Apart. The anti-piracy outfit said it obtained the “enforcement rights” from Los Angeles-based Hannibal Pictures.

Contra Piracy claim to have monitored 2,919 individuals infringing All Things Fall Apart on more than 280,000 occasions. They say they cannot identify these people without the help of ISPs, so they are seeking the court’s help in this respect.

Adding interest to the case is that Contra Piracy are based in Switzerland. They say they are a non-profit group that brings together ‘independent members’ such as technology companies, law firms and copyright owners in order to reduce piracy.

Of course, a lack of profit isn’t usually a feature of copyright trolling. In this case Contra want an absolute minimum of $5,000 from each target in the hope they will reclaim at least $7,500,000. That is $500,000 more than the movie cost to make.

To collect its evidence Contra Piracy used anti-piracy monitoring company Logistep, a company that became infamous in the UK for its connections to troll pioneer law firm Davenport Lyons. Logistep was later banned from monitoring alleged pirates in its home country.

Contra Piracy / Logistep have provided the court with a huge list of IP addresses allegedly used to share the movie and it’s quite the who’s-who of United States ISPs. America Online, AT&T, BellSouth, Verizon, Charter, Comcast, Cox, Road Runner, Qwest, T-Mobile, Sprint – they’re all here. In fact, Contra want disclosure from a claimed 61 ISPs, which may well be a record in this type of case.

However, in addition to targeting thousands of regular domestic subscribers, Contra Piracy is revisiting the ‘bad old days’ of RIAA lawsuits by targeting educational establishments too.

The Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia, private Roman Catholic arts college The College of Saint Elizabeth, the Francis Marion arts university, University of West Florida, Lamar University, Wilberforce University and Montclair State University are all listed.

Secured Servers LLC web hosting company also makes an appearance, which could possibly be down to a customer running a seedbox. The Ingersoll Rand company can also expect a call.

How the universities involved will respond to Contra Piracy remains to be seen, but they may have to be compliant in order to show that they are worthy of federal funding.

Finally, we ran a few checks on Contra Piracy and found a couple of interesting things with their domain owner “Thomas Zeeck”. Not only does he own the Contrapiracy.com domain, he also owns domains which trade on the names of the German and Swiss pirate parties – Piraten-Partei-Deutschland.com and Piratenpartei-Schweiz.org

Related Posts

Previous Post | Next Post

  • Reasonist

    >Say the group is “nonprofit”.
    >Want a minimum of $5,000 from each target

    That is looking at a maximum of $14,595,000 for them (2x the movie’s budget). These people like to contradict themselves, possibly so the victims get confused and just give them money to go away (best case scenario for them).

    • Scary_Devil_Monastery

      And entering “Prenda 2.0″.

      Now all we have to do is wait for the usual pro-copyright advocates from the church of copyright to come around and defend these “righteous organizations” for “by any means” obtaining money from presumtive filesharers.

      And to stand around red-faced and screaming incoherently when we call them on it.

      • Anon

        Cue bobby lol

      • JordanKratz

        Your Nickname Rules ! So does Mine !

        The Scary_Devil_Monastery Gorehound…………….making Gore out of people who would work in places like Contra Piracy / Logistep.

      • ITakeAPotatoChipAndEatIt

        “And entering “Prenda 2.0″.”

        Exactly what it smells like, Prenda also described themselves as non-profit, and never actually payed the rights owners when they got money from their letters.

      • Rallias

        And entering “Prenda 2.0″

        And CegTek 3.0.

        You know, speaking of which, I’ve not seen CegTek bitching lately… they used to send like a notice a day… where’ve they gone?

  • Perry

    So.. We’re they sued for 50 cents?

    • Smeargle

      We are they sued for 50 cents? I doubt it.

      • George Carlin

        I am more than happy we are they sued for 50 cents.

  • ether

    50 Cent the rapper

    • zarathustra2k1

      Here’s the ‘c’ prefix you forgot for your last word.

  • WTF

    wow who would even pirate that shit??

    • Bart

      Me. To check how bad is it and make a parody of it.

      • One-Eyed Willie

        Regardless of how bad it is there is a provision for educational purposes is their not?

        • Boring Phil

          They’re should be.

        • http://twitter.com/BobAgger BobAgger

          just as Mike replied I am impressed that anyone able to earn $4539 in a few weeks on the inetwork..

        • http://twitter.com/BobAgger BobAgger

          ….—goo.gl/8hEuk (Home more information)

        • Who

          yes under the US copyright acts fair use section, schools are exempt from copyright infringement just as long as they are not profiting off of the works.
          but it seams that the copyright holders don’t abide by the law. NOPE….been telling ya all this for months now.
          clued in yet?

        • bobmail

          Schools are exempt in some cases if the material is SPECIFICALLY used as teaching / course material, but may or may not mean the entire movie.

          That exemption doesn’t cover students pirating shit in their dorm rooms and in class.

        • Who

          um….yes it does. dumdum read the copyright act.

        • Who

          if the copy right act actually did say that sharing freely is an act of copyright infringement Y would I bother saying it doesn’t. Ive read it. and I am NOT talking about the bull shit old as dirt DMCA. im talking about the US copyright act that the DMCA is NOW apart of. its been added to and revised but head.

        • bobmail

          Umm, please show me EXACTLY where in the copyright act that there is any provision for non-educational uses by schools?

          Answer: None.

          The exception made is for use of the material for teaching, not for entertaining. Otherwise, schools would show first run movies and charge access, but not pay because they were exempt from copyright – and they could make a killing. They can’t, and when they do have a movie night, they pay a fee to the rights holder for the movie.

          Sorry, but if you guys are going to get all uppity about stuff, at least try to have a clue.

        • downloader

          “Umm, please show me EXACTLY where in the copyright act that there is any provision for non-educational uses by schools?”

          WoW you really ARE STUPID. you should try reading it. I have and there are several provisions listed that provide exemptions for infringement and they apply to every one, not just schools.

        • Who

          OK FUCK HEAD here is the prof.
          http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap1.html

          107 . Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use

          “Notwithstanding the provisions of sections
          106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted
          work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright”

          files haring/distribution falls under criticism, comment, teaching/education and research. also as long as it is NOT sold for profit.

          so I say again YOU ARE WRONG!

          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gu5JdmsLWVk&list=FLZehVWSPOf0z-_wN9Wzr-IQ&index=3

        • Ultmast

          Hey stupid, you just proved *his* contentions, and not yours. The University can only use that material for specific uses, and *cannot* distribute. It also certainly has no bearing on what bobmail said about *students* distributing.

          You’ve shown no actual understanding of the material you quoted and linked to.

        • Who

          no your NOT reading the act correctly STUPID!

          key word here is “for purposes such as” this applies to any one doing these things.

          any one doing the distributing for… criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use) like if they were in there home and downloading or @ school, scholarship, or research.

          read the fine print and between the lines as it does not say EXCEPT FOR. it says Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A witch says that
          the owner of copyright under this title has the exclusive rights to do and to authorize any of the following:

          key word here is authorize…..movies, music software and games have already been AUTHORIZED for privet use home use…its always been this way. people share in there homes and in there dorms @ school. so how is this not privet?

          even the MPAA has stated that there works are for privet and home use ONLY.

          so tell me another one

        • Ultmast

          Your comment is the same painful stupidity as the previous one. You’re reading and quoting the material but *not understanding it at all*. The university CANNOT distribute for purposes of entertainment. The STUDENTS cannot distribute the material legally, either.

          Where do you idiots come from? The adults are trying to talk about this

        • Pierat

          who said this CRAP is entertaining? LOL

        • Pierat

          I download for educating myself to see if the SHIT is worth buying. so how is that not fair? so what I am required to PAY for shit I don’t like now? what ever you idiot. there is no law saying that I am required to PAY.

          BTW it was stupid adults that act like spoiled children that came up with this BS in the 1st place. LOL

        • Andrew me

          (including multiple copies for classroom use)

          The above line in the law books is very clearly allowing the school to distribute to the classroom any copyright video.Anyone can say they downloaded and watched a movie for educational purposes it is up to the troll to prove them wrong.

          The rest of your argument can be shown to be wrong, but i cant be bothered to waste my time on doing so.

        • Who

          I am sorry but I am unable to locate the other information that proves this.

          so the MPAA/RIAA really must only want people to ONLY view/listen to there works in the home and are only paying for a right to just view/listen to…..so FUCK THAT SHIT as it VIOLATES my property rights.

          so simply put…. FUCK THE MPAA/RIAA they want my business they had better start FULLY complying with peoples rights. till then they have completely lost my respect for there works and my business.

          “end of line”

        • Ultmast

          This comment has no basis in reality. You simple have no idea what you’re talking about.

          The RIAA and MPAA aren’t even involved in this, dumbass. The main issue is also the *illegal* distribution of material, not fair use or DMCA exemption.

          You have no place in this discussion with your incredible level of ignorance of the subject

        • Pierat

          nether do you LOL

        • Pierat

          “The RIAA and MPAA aren’t even involved in this, dumbass. The main issue
          is also the *illegal* distribution of material, not fair use or DMCA exemption”

          well people do make mistakes.

          problem is we got people like you that come in places like this a bitch about it, when in reality you are just hurt that some one proves you wrong. then you raise hell about it. your pride is all that’s hurt.

          btw regardless of the fact that the MPAA or the RIAA are not involved in this, the copyright act is. funny how only selected people are getting targeted for infringement as per how you all think infringement works. Y not anybody else? seems strange to me.

        • Pierat

          well actually after having a look at the reformed copyright law I can say this much, its definitions are not to direct and parts of it contradict itself.

          but the people that do care about any copyright reform are looking to have it so that making a back up of there media for personal use is fair “even tho it is already per property rights law” or to eliminate it altogether. problem is judging by how this new one is wrote up, its never going to happen. in fact it looks more like they plan on tightening the grip and making 2nd hand sales illegal.

          “proved *his* contentions, and not yours”

          his? don’t fallow ya on that.

          “WHO” is pointing out that as long as ANY of the provisions the act is referring to for fair use. its not infringing on copyrights. and yes the words USE does in fact imply a multitude of uses, not just viewing. and yep it has been that way for years. but they really do need to be more specific. like for example “the provisions” it should say “all provisions”.

        • xmichaelx

          Everything you just posted argues AGAINST your own contention that “schools are exempt from copyright infringement.”

          Also, “Fair Use” isn’t a right; it’s a legal argument. Fair Use can ONLY be decided by a judge, I’m sad to say.

          Learn something, then speak — you’ll look less foolish.

        • josh1073

          100% agree, they are quick to sue people but not quick to read the rules they claim they uphold.

        • xmichaelx

          “under the US copyright acts fair use section, schools are exempt from copyright infringement just as long as they are not profiting off of the works.”

          This is NOT true. At all. Not even close. I work at an academic library, and copyright is a CONSTANT hassle.

    • Boring Phil

      At least this helps explain the current standard of academic discourse coming out of the US.

    • http://tiny.cc/Justp94 Justin T. Poindexter

      lol it’s actually one of those movies that should be pirated, however the message in the movie isn’t bad.

  • http://fightcopyrighttrolls.com/ SJD

    Boden Davidson is a pompous unprofessional “lawyer” and a coward: he went by his own name but then changed his handle to “arxic” in a discussion on Wired. Read it, it is entertaining. And pay attention to the votes.

    http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/07/porn-studios-screw-fans/

    • highboi

      Sounds a lot like bob, IMO

    • Boring Phil

      What the hell?

      Clicked on that link, and in place of the comments I got this:

      “Nothing for you here … yet. But as you comment with Disqus and follow other Disqus users, you will start to receive notifications here, as well as a personalized feed of activity by you and the people you follow. So get out there and participate in some discussions!”
      No. Get out there and fuck off, Disqus. I wanted to comment on TF, not have my internet censored by some cunt company with useless tech.

      So I’m now sorely disappointed by both Torrentfreak and Wired.
      (Not knocking your post, SJD!)

      • Anyone

        works for me

        • Boring Phil

          Well, that’s alright then.

  • Victor

    “”Copyright trolls from Switzerland, who say they are part of a non-profit
    organization, are about to shake down thousands of alleged pirates who
    shared the 50 Cent movie All Things Fall Apart. However, in addition to the usual subscribers of ISPs such as Verizon,
    Comcast and AT&T, the trolls are trying to obtain the identities of
    individuals located at universities around the United States.”"

    And since when does US ISP’s come under the jurisdiction of Switzerland. Hopefully these US ISP’s will tell these copyright trolls from Switzerland where to go and if that doesn’t work then if the Judge overseeing the copyright troll Prenda has told Prenda that the action that they undertake to find out who the culprit is that downloaded the file does not establish who the person is responsible for the download and therefore there is no case to answer then maybe another Judge will state to these copyright trolls in Switzerland the same and also that an IP does not establish or prove who is responsible.

    • Anyone

      if only the US was under Switzerland jurisdiction

      downloading is perfectly legal there

      • Who

        downloading is legal in the US. read the US copyright act buddy. the copyright holders just don’t want you to think it is.

  • Guest

    Haha, so this is the best bobmail’s heroes can do – make use of an incriminated investigative company. Once again, demonstrating the glorious legacy of copyright enforcement that needs the law to be broken to continues. Good job, bobmail!

    • highboi

      What’s sad is the school might have to pay up if they get a corrupt judge just to continue federal fundings

  • highboi

    Completly off topic: I like how he said “this time in California” like Los Angeles isn’t in Cali

    • Violated0

      Yes that made me logic glitch also but possible to say somewhere in California which is not Los Angeles. Using “also in California” would have worked much better.

  • AfriendlyTroll

    I will download it only to delete it when finished downloading.I say prove it bitches.Someone must have hacked my WIFI.Who would watch that garbage? :D

  • Pingback: University Students and Staff Sued For Pirating 50 Cent Movie | We R Pirates

  • JordanKratz

    bobmail’s fave Contra Piracy / Logistep should be a Target for up and coming Hacker Geeks.Try out your fancy stuff on these Assholes and do a dump of all their Internal Shit.

    Claims to be a Non-Profit……………Can someone empty their Bank Account and Donate the Money to a decent cause like helping out others from A-Holes like Contra Piracy / Logistep.Do that and they will be a Non-Profit.

  • Oblong of Orange

    Bloody students.

    But seriously, they really expect a good outcome from this? Well, I look forward to this one, the Prenda one has been a real roller-coaster ride. Popcorn is no help here.

  • ralph

    Dear Mommy and Daddy:
    Junior’s tuition will be going up. Oh, and BTW, you’re being sued.

  • Typhoid Mary

    Bob will be here shortly. He’s getting his daily sponge bath and meds with Jello at the moment before another hard day here in the comment section.

    He’s a handful trying to dress because he thinks his penis is a file-sharer trying to hide in his pants.

    • Guest

      why are you so obsessed with his penis may I ask?

      • Typhoid Mary

        Personally I don’t think he has one, that’s why it irritates him so much.

        Anything you’d like to share? Your not jealous are you? I’m not a male nurse so Bob wont have any sexual feelings towards me if that’s what your getting at.

      • Nejtillpirater

        Bob is embarrassed because Mary is right he dont have a willy,good sir.

    • UraPhake

      Gerbils hide in bob’s pants. They wait in a line.

  • VPN

    Look out MAFIAA there’s a new sheriff in town.

    It’s a FREE Open Source Project called VPNGATE. It can turn ANY PC into a VPN node. It’s Totally Free. It just launched this week. Think of it as super fast TOR on steroids. But YOU (the user) create your own ‘path’
    thru the Internet by cascading several nodes together.

    It’s the brain child of students in Japan.

    I’m testing it now.
    Freaking AMAZING!

    This is gonna be BIG!

    • VPN

      BTW … You don’t need to install any software. Just choose from the already 100′s of volunteer FREE VPNs on the website. Cascade these together any way you want (pptp, L2TP, SSTP, OpenVPN).
      I’m using my paid VPN (CactusVPN) to test a bunch of the free volunteer VPNs. Pretty darn fast for a network just born (1-week old).

    • holololol

      They log connection data. Dealbreaker, don’t use.

      • VPN

        The Japanese student actually publishes connection logs real-time with the connection IP truncated. Cascade a few of the free VPNs and these logs are moot. It’s cool. You can ‘see’ your connection path real-time but only YOU know it’s you.
        Get it yet? You need I explain more until you get it?

    • Austin Williamson

      *coughcough*RetroShare*cough*

      Seriously, though: never use anything public. Only share with people you can trust!

  • Andrew Lee

    I would not pay 50 cents for that pos movie.
    Actually you could not even pay me to watch that garbage.

  • http://twitter.com/Mathew30 Mathew Lisett

    so let me get this right. a non profit is seeking to gain a ton of money which would mean PROFIT…. surely that would mean they would lose their non profit tag and licence if they have any

  • MadAsASnake

    When they say they got the “enforcement rights” it means they hve no right of action at all. They would have to join with everyone else with rights… Now, wouldn’t it be a good idea for the courts to run a “Show Cause” just as they did with Prenda? Pretty sure these folks will do a vanishing act…

  • http://www.facebook.com/mark.talmadge Mark Talmadge

    The movie aptly describes these copyright trolls … “All Things Fall Apart”. Sounds like the studio is trying to force these pirates to pay them for the budget for this movie. It’s like the studio spent $7 million for a movie where they lost money and they are trying to recoop those loses by forcing pirates to fork over the cash.

    Talk about a screwed up business model.

  • Getyb

    Now they’ll have to pay one dolla!

  • ItsTheSasquatch

    >Make a terrible movie

    >Lose money because no one wanted to watch it

    >Pretend people pirated it

    >Sue until profit is made

    Any business/law school that teaches this as a valid business model needs to be leveled, preferably with its students and faculty still inside.

    • Violated0

      Sounds like the slogan of a very shady business “Turn your failed movie into a healthy profit by suing the pirates!”

      Indeed some people cannot handle their creation flunking in the belief their glorious artistic nature was just stolen by pirates. I think they should just be happy that some people wanted to watch it.

  • good luck with that

    Logistep & MarkMonitor

    Those are two companies cashing in on selling people out.

  • Zinkqink

    OK wow thats the most absurd thing I have heard all week. Wow.

    Goto-Anon.tk

  • Dude

    You think 50 cent gives a fuck if some people are downloading his movies. Just another way for some trolls to make some quick $$

    • Anonymous

      FUCK 50 Cent he’s nothing but a no talent crackhead F’N nigger

  • wargamer1969

    Breaking out all the stops aren’t they lol. People need to wise up and stay ahead of those asshats. VPN, seedbox, Proxies. research and wise up to them. Don’t let them win.

  • Who

    yep this is a good example of abuse of the law.

  • Pingback: Estudiantes y personal universitario demandado por piratería de una película de 50 Cevs. | Partido Pirata

  • dribble

    “Contra Piracy claim to have monitored 2,919 individuals infringing All Things Fall Apart on more than 280,000 occasions”

    does anyone think 2919 individuals would need close to 96 copies of the film each?

  • JG

    T-Mobile & Sprint don’t have “land-line” connections like Verizon and AT&T right… So for them to be listed as ISPs of interest in this case, that means someone(s) used their mobile phone to download the movie…

    In a way, I’m kind of surprised .. I mean, I suppose it was only a matter of time, but… I’d think the less than stellar battery life, data caps and all that would discourage people from using their phones to download stuff like that…

    I’m even more surprised the carriers even allow it, especially with their whole we-don’t-have-enough-bandwidth-to-let-our-customers-do whatever-they-want,-we-have-to-limit-them-to-just-2GB/month mentality .. We’ve seen them put blocks on FaceTime & other similar programs to prevent their use over 3G as to leave bandwidth for others (*and probably more so upon Apple’s insistence so the video quality is always stellar). Verizon blocks IRC completely over 3G – though I’d assume it’s for reasons other than bandwidth control as I doubt it’d use that much… So it wouldn’t be too unreasonable for the carriers to ban torrenting over their mobile network. I know my alma mater put filters on their wifi to prevent torrenting & other p2p usage on their wifi (if you wanted to pirate, you had to do so in your dorm room, you couldn’t go out & enjoy the nice day in the quad)

    • downloader

      Verizon has land lines? that’s news to me. but yes that was the point of the data caps. as they cant actually sue you for sharing unless you are profiting directly off of it. so they try and slow ya down.

      • JG

        Technically, Verizon is exclusively land-line. Verizon Wireless is the mobile company (though, they’re both actually the same company). Along with traditional copper wire telephone service, Verizon also offers VoIP phone, Internet & television packages under the FIOS brand. Though their FIOS service area is rather limited geographically. AT&T offers similar services via U-Verse.

        You may want to check your facts again though, if I’m not mistaken, I believe the “only if you profit from it” bit has been removed from the law. Though I’m not a lawyer – I don’t even play one on TV… I mean they did go after a 9yo little girl & take her winnie the pooh laptop and continued to threaten the father with additional legal proceedings… I doubt she was selling copies of the songs she downloaded (OK, not a US example, but)….

  • That_Anonymous_Coward

    One question…
    What the hell are “enforcement rights”?
    Did we not learn from Righthaven you can’t split up stuff this way?

  • josh1073

    This copyright shit is getting out of hand now. Its funny because we all know 50 was pirating others music before he was famous and watching bootleg movies.

  • bry68

    people…………suck :)

  • John Doe

    Rapidshare has a massive stain on their reputation after their actions this week. They used to offer unlimited storage. They informed users this week that they had 8 days to either sign up for 250GB plan, 500GB (overpriced plan) or have their extra files above the threshold deleted. I have no problem with them making business decisions that they must make to turn a profit… but this was a serious slap in the face to users to only give us 8 days notice. Nobody should ever trust them again (if you even trusted them before)..

    • ItsTheSasquatch

      RS has been useless garbage since the MegaUpload raid. Damned cowards have been kissing the MaFIAA’s ass ever since.

  • Pingback: University Students and Staff Sued For Pirating 50 Cent Movie ‘All Things Fall Apart’: ‘in addition to the usual subscribers of ISPs such as Verizon, Comcast and AT&T, the copyright trolls are trying to obtain the identities of individuals located at US universities.’ | On Reddit

  • sickofUSA

    50 cent is worth a penny!!

  • xczcz

    The reason is AMERIKA!

  • sjococo

    Hmm, interesting point is that Hannibal Pictures is mentioned as copyright holder, but on their site they mention the domestic rights for this movie are transferred to Image Entertainment as reported in The Hollywood Reporter. So, from who did Contra Piracy obtained the rights and on what date. The transferdate of the domestic rights is also important… The news article in THR is 9/9/2011, quite old news…

    http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/50-cents-all-things-fall-233480

  • BTGuard - BitTorrent Anonymously

NewsBits

Even more news...

  • The Pirate Bay Isn’t Down Completely, Just Having a Few Issues

    Twitter and Facebook, not to mention the TorrentFreak inbox, are currently alive with complaints that The...

  • Pirate Bay Founder Gottfrid Svartholm on Freedom of Speech

    Freedom of speech is a highly valued commodity, but should people be allowed to say whatever...

  • Blu-ray Anti-Piracy Tech Stops Discs and Promotes Purchases

    An anti-piracy system present in all official Blu-ray players since 2012 has received a fresh update...

  • Foxtel Breeds Pirates by Locking Up Game of Thrones

    One of the main reasons why people turn to piracy is the lack of legal alternatives....

  • UK Student Admits Breaching Sony Copyrights With Leak of PS3 SDK

    Last year an Internet user known as El Nomeo leaked version 3.70 of Sony’s Playstation3 SDK...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

PopularArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.