TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

Code Aims to Quell New Zealand “3 Strikes” Fears

The Telecommunications Carriers Forum (TCF) which represents ISPs and telecoms companies in New Zealand has drafted a code of practice which outlines the manner in which the new Section 92 “3 Strikes” regime should be handled by its members. It aims to dampen the many fears of Internet users.

Scheduled for introduction at the end of February 2009, Section 92 of the Copyright Amendment Act 2008 is causing concern for many in New Zealand, with the threat of Internet disconnection for those accused of sharing copyright works looming large. The Telecommunications Carriers’ Forum (TCF) has declared that its members believe that Section 92 “is seriously flawed” but nevertheless has just released a draft of its ISP Copyright Code of Practice for public consultation.

“The Copyright Act was amended in 2008 to include s92A which requires Internet Service Providers to have a policy to terminate the accounts of repeat copyright infringers in appropriate circumstances,” said TCF CEO Ralph Chivers. “This Draft Code is intended to be a template policy for ISPs, to assist them in meeting their obligations under the Act.”

The draft has been created by a group of New Zealand’s largest ISPs, the Internet Service Providers Association of New Zealand (ISPANZ) and Internet NZ, with input from the entertainment industries. It puts some much-needed ‘meat-on-the-bones’ of how allegations of infringement under Section 92 could be handled in practice, along with clarification of what would constitute someone being labeled as a “repeat infringer” for example.

This is how TCF propose that part of the system will work. First off, a copyright holder would identify an infringement and notify the ISP of the infringing customer immediately. The ISP would check to ensure that the complaint meets the standards required by the draft code and ensure that the evidence provided would be of such a quality that it would stand up in court. If it does not meet the standards, it will be returned to the copyright holder. If it is discovered that the copyright holder hasn’t already been ‘pre-approved’ to participate in the scheme, they are given the opportunity to join by paying a fee. The claim is then processed.

At this point the ISP checks to see if the customer has already been complained about. If they have received less than two complaints already, they receive what is known as an ‘Education Notice’. If they have received two of such notices, the ISP well then active the ‘Termination Process’. In either event, the copyright holder is notified of the action taken.

The definition of a ‘Repeat Infringer’ (and one who will be disconnected) is an Internet user who has received three Education Notices in any given 18 month period. Education Notices expire 18 months after being issued, effectively giving the user a clean sheet again.

There are also systems proposed for dealing with the actual termination of a customer’s ISP account, with provisions for taking extra caution over so-called ‘Vulnerable Customers’ (someone “who for reasons of health, disability or safety, or that of a member of their household, is reliant on their Internet Account”) and ‘Essential Service Providers’ (a “person who requires their Internet Account in order to deliver an essential service referred to in Part A of Schedule 1 of the Employment Relations Act 2000“)

Customers accused of infringement will also have the right to dispute the allegations made against them and the draft details the procedure clearly.

The draft Internet Service Provider (ISP) Copyright Code of Practice is available for viewing here. Submissions to the draft should be emailed to submissions@tcf.org.nz or posted to: Telecommunications Carriers’ Forum, PO Box 302469, North Harbour, Auckland.

The closing date for submissions is 5pm, Friday 6th March 2009.

Related Posts

Previous Post | Next Post

  • http://www.10ch.org/ www.10ch.org

    Of course, these 3 strike fears, which last time was heard here as “1 strike,” are not quelled at all by these clarifications.

  • pink panther

    Simplified code of conduct: “As long as one proprietary content file exists in the universe, you are a target and guilty until proven innocent.”

    The only way to stop this is to quit giving them your money.

  • http://www.10ch.org/ www.10ch.org

    @2 pink panther
    There is a big problem with that: many people are continuing to give them their money, and this is what the vast majority of people are doing. They can survive if only a few people refuse to give them money. This would work only when a much greater number of people are boycotting.

  • r0ck

    Why this will never work:

    “The ISP would check to ensure that the complaint meets the standards required by the draft code and ensure that the evidence provided would be of such a quality that it would stand up in court.”

    So the ISP has to do all the legal work, has to decide if the copyright was actually infringed and so on. Taking torrent swarms as example there is not yet one set of evidence that is actually viable and “would stand up in court” there are defenses against IP numbers, against protocol timing, spoofed peers etc. I think the NZ ISPs have really spread their cheeks here and the industry gladly fucked them.

    Now the ISPs have to do all the work and if they’re successful … disconnect their paying customers. One of the dumbest business moves I’ve seen … ever.

  • Howard

    “If it is discovered that the copyright holder hasn’t already been ‘pre-approved’ to participate in the scheme, they are given the opportunity to join by paying a fee.”

    Who is getting paid here? and who is running the scheme?

  • yeah

    sounds like if you bitch enough you can get out of anything.. or after 2 education notices just download from someone elses connection until 18 months pass..

    and even if you do get terminated, call up and act like your someone else who just moved in and want your internet up rofl..

    win win win

  • magicanimal

    Gotta wonder how the copy-holders propose to pay the ISPs for all this extra work… Why aren’t the ISPs fighting this more? I would imagine these sort of requirements would necessitate many, many new employees!

  • for yeah

    Not if your giving your adresse. They will trace you by that.

    People moving to canada because of war or foodless.

    People will move to canada because of war. War of file-sharing law! haha

  • anonymous

    “First off, a copyright holder would identify an infringement and notify the ISP of the infringing customer immediately”

    The copyright holders can’t find their own ass with both hands, let alone identify an infringement.

    Therein lies the reason why the 3 strikes system can’t hold up under its own weight, whether or not ISPs decide to play ball with it… And few will.

  • djnforce9

    Something they’d also have to declare is how much time needs to elapse before another claim can be made against the same person. Otherwise, if someone is caught seeding three different torrents, they could potentially get their three strikes (and with that, their internet connection disabled) all in one go (or within the time it takes for even a single notice to be mailed).

  • Ron

    Why aren’t the ISPs fighting this more? Backhanders in N Z & Ireland!!!!

  • Do It Already

    ‘Education Notices’, wow, and there’s me thinking I’d escaped schooling 18 years ago.

    Free market economics, or preservation of status quo?

  • Fight_The_Tyranny

    Every one should cancel their isp accounts in protest. For communication and file sharing, use open wifi networks.

  • Jacob

    I live in New Zealand and if they disconect my internet connection im taking them to court.

  • NZ pirate

    I believe this is crap, the movie industry is controlling the laws in my country instead of the people of my country. Once this is in place won’t we be able to register it under different peoples names to get our three strikes back though? For example, I get two strikes so my flatmate puts the connection under his/her name then we get three more strikes or am I wrong?

  • Rotm

    Fuck all this crap! …3 strikes, disconnection bah.

    I wonder what percentage of customers of various ISP’s will actually be affected by “disconnection”?

    By complying isn’t this just ISP’s shooting themselves in the foot?

    The profit from each connection is very little as it is! I would say the most profit is from excess usage charges (going over your already small data cap) i.e. by downloading big “illegal” files

    BTW- Fuck you and your over priced copyright fucking shit.

  • Pingback: What’s Happening? » Blog Archive » Disconnection Online - Madden Tips, Madden 2009 Tips, Madden 09 …

  • Christopher

    This will be overturned in a New Zealand court, mark my words…. the first time someone decides to sue the company in question over this, it will be overturned in a court of law and the companies in question will be looking at each other like cattle about to be killed, asking themselves “How did we get ourselves into this situation?”

  • Leonidas

    The whole thing is rubbish and it won’t work if our isps wants to disconnect all us that’s fine they’ll remember us when there’s no one using their services!!!

  • Yogi

    How did NZ get so fucked up?

    Amazing how one determined business can overthrow a Democracy so quickly.

    Without a shot and without any resistance from the population.

  • Fight_the_Tyranny

    That’s because it was never really a true democracy. In fact most supposedly democratic nations are merely dressed up dictatorships whose ruling elite drive all decision making.

    You get one vote (every 4 years US, even less in europe). Then your only choice is which party will dictate for the next x years. True democracy involves the people in decision making; our so called democracies are nothing but a species of deception.

  • Pingback: 4 years and counting | Delusions of Grandeur

  • Yogi

    Fight_the_Tyranny:

    yeah, you’re right, I guess, but still – what about the pretense? Shouldn’t that be kept up so the population won’t begin to feel uncomfortable?

  • Pingback: ISPs neo-zelandeses pretendem colocar travões a lei da resposta gradual | Remixtures

  • Pingback: The Anti Spam Hub

  • Pingback: ISP Code of Practice Aims to Quell New Zealand “3 Strikes” Fears | CyberLaw Blog

  • Pingback: Sheldon Lendrum » Archive » Torrent Downloading Laws in New Zealand ~ Update

  • vag

    if it happens their will be no internet in nz lol

  • Loop-holes in the new law

    Okay how to beat section 92A of the copyright amendment act laws

    1 use a proxy (there are heaps of free proxy services which will mask your IP address. Also use ananonymous network/vpn service – both these measures will greatly reduce your detectability

    2 use a tommizone router which should potentially make you ISP as defined by the guidelines(who are exempt from being disconnected), giving you sufficient grounds to dispute any copyright abuse claims

    3 become an essential service (selling milk is considered an essential service). Simply put a sign outside your gate and you’re also exaempt from disconnection

  • X-Man

    I dont think ISP’s will be losing out too much… Copyright holders are to pay a fee when notifying the ISP of infringement… For every notice. Depending how much that is, we may have lost already.

    I smell some nasty people making a hell of a lot of money.

  • Pingback: 3 Count: 50% Off | PlagiarismToday

  • BTGuard - BitTorrent Anonymously

NewsBits

Even more news...

  • Blu-ray Anti-Piracy Tech Stops Discs and Promotes Purchases

    An anti-piracy system present in all official Blu-ray players since 2012 has received a fresh update...

  • Foxtel Breeds Pirates by Locking Up Game of Thrones

    One of the main reasons why people turn to piracy is the lack of legal alternatives....

  • UK Student Admits Breaching Sony Copyrights With Leak of PS3 SDK

    Last year an Internet user known as El Nomeo leaked version 3.70 of Sony’s Playstation3 SDK...

  • Pirates Can Be Identified Despite Sharing IP Addresses, ISP Claims

    Carrier-Grade Network Address Translation is a network mechanism through which many Internet subscribers can share the...

  • Feds Seize Cash from Major Bitcoin Exchange’s Dwolla Account

    The U.S. Government has taken a significant action against the web’s top Bitcoin exchange by seizing...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

PopularArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.