Copyright Group Prosecuted For Failing to Pay Artists

Written by Ernesto on July 22, 2009 

The attorney general in Brussels has concluded a three year investigation into the money trails at the the local music royalty collecting agency SABAM. The attorney general concluded that the copyright group is not paying the artists the money owed to them, and will prosecute five managers for forgery of documents and abuse of trust.

sabamRoyalty collection agencies go to the extremes, ostensibly to claim money on behalf of artists and music composers. They target schools and kids’ community centers for singing Christmas carols without a license, and some even crash weddings if they have to.

With all this dedication one would expect that such groups would handle the money they collect with care. However, according to a report from the attorney general, in the case of the Belgian copyright group SABAM the opposite is true.

In the report published today after a three year investigation, it was concluded that SABAM has been keeping money from artists. The attorney general further noted that SABAM was poorly organized, demonstrated a lack of internal control, and was unclear about how the royalties they collect should be divided between the various artists and composers.

It was further found that significant amounts of money were not paid at all, and were kept on the bankroll of SABAM. Aside from the administrative mess, SABAM has also misled artists by misrepresenting certain costs on their yearly balance.

As a consequence of these findings, five of SABAM’s top managers will be prosecuted. The five are accused of abuse of trust and forgery of documents. In addition, SABAM will have to compensate the artists for their losses. How much money SABAM held from the artists wasn’t made public, but it is a significant amount according to the report.

This is not the first time SABAM has made the headlines. In one of their most prominent legal cases against the Belgian ISP Scarlett, the court ruled that the ISP has to stop all piracy on its network or pay a 2,500 Euros fine per day.

The case against Scarlett is currently under appeal, but if SABAM wins again, we will be very interested to hear of their plans for any damages awarded to them. We seriously doubt that the artists they claim to represent will get their rightful share.

Previously: Anti-Piracy Group Claims Mass Mininova Torrent Deletion

Next: Pirate Bay Founders Sue BREIN for Slander and Abuse

61 Responses

1 Jul 22, 2009 at 23:54 by jebus

awesome. thanks for the article!

2 Jul 22, 2009 at 23:56 by Anonymous

Stop all piracy on their networks? That sounds like an easy job…

3 Jul 22, 2009 at 23:57 by ;)

Can’t wait for neostyles to show up to explain to us that this isn’t really stealing, since nothing was copied.

4 Jul 23, 2009 at 00:00 by Anonymous

The penalties will be puny.. :\

5 Jul 23, 2009 at 00:03 by Anonymous

“royalties” should apply to kingdoms only, why is it even used in relation to petty entertainers and their slave drivers?

6 Jul 23, 2009 at 00:08 by ;)

Can’t wait for neothingy to show up to explain to us that this isn’t really stealing, since nothing was actually copied.

7 Jul 23, 2009 at 00:14 by neothingy

This isn’t really stealing, since nothing was actually copied.

8 Jul 23, 2009 at 00:16 by Anon

Artists and Customers FTW!

F*#K the RIAA, F#:K the MPAA, F+<K the suits behind the PSA and F{}K them ALL for the DMCA!

9 Jul 23, 2009 at 00:44 by EC665

Ohh, what a news!! I would take ‘em to the street and publicly shoot them in the head. Confiscate all their personal assets and give it to the artists and transparent and well organized charities. Bunch of greedy ©o©ksu©kers… don’t deserve any better.

10 Jul 23, 2009 at 00:56 by jack

Now someone just needs to sue the humps at the RIAA because they don’t pay the artists shit either.

J.

11 Jul 23, 2009 at 00:59 by J

Why the hell did it take three years?

Step 1: Roll into the SABAM demand the acount books, bank accounts statements and blackmail letters*cough* i mean invoices to be handed over.

Step 2: Have 100 monkeys *cough* dedicated accountants work through the books and make two figures, Money in and money out. NOTICE the discrepancy.

Step 3: Don’t profit

Easy

-Jay

12 Jul 23, 2009 at 01:31 by Anonymous

neosuckling this taking of money is stealing. downloading for free is not.

13 Jul 23, 2009 at 01:50 by d[iO]nysus

@J

Times are tough; paying off political parties and law enforcement isn’t as easy in this tough economy.

:D

14 Jul 23, 2009 at 02:07 by Anonymous

Sabam forgot to bribe someone. D’oh!

15 Jul 23, 2009 at 02:09 by yermum

D’OH!

16 Jul 23, 2009 at 02:14 by mister_playboy

This will be found to be the case at every single such royalty-collection organization, I am sure.

What a racket…

17 Jul 23, 2009 at 02:28 by neothingy

@7
its BSA (business software alliance) , not PSA (public service announcement)

18 Jul 23, 2009 at 02:32 by diarRIAA

I seriously doubt that any copyright levy’s paid on blank CD’s ever reach the artists eithers. I would urge an investigation of all organizations that claim to collect monies for the artists.

19 Jul 23, 2009 at 02:32 by diarRIAA

I seriously doubt that any copyright levy’s paid on blank CD’s ever reach the artists either. I would urge an investigation of all organizations that claim to collect monies for the artists.

20 Jul 23, 2009 at 02:32 by Anonymous

The entertainment industry is chock full of parasites!

Let’s bring the pest killer and finish them off!

Dam It!

21 Jul 23, 2009 at 02:40 by Anonymous

guyz

sabam = sadam w/ baclwards b!!!!!!

22 Jul 23, 2009 at 02:51 by apollo21

some smaller or indie german artists claim this about gema as well. especially about performace fees, which at least from what one artist said, the place hosting the performance has to pay, even for the artist performing her own songs. Many times, more money is paid then the artist gets. So far, however, it seems this has always been ruled legal. Nobody knows exactly where the money goes cause gema doesn’t have to tell, but it likely goes to big celeb acts. So afaik artists can’t opt out of paying, but also apparently have no entitlement to what the places they play at pay in, not even a fixed amount of it. This seriously makes me wonder who I’m paying …
I don’t know of an english link but the singer summarized this here (german) http://www.kult-werk.de/GEMA/UrteilverkuendigungClear.htm

23 Jul 23, 2009 at 03:35 by Kanine

I always have thought and reaffirmed that all these pro-copyright organizations as the RIAA, SABAM, SGAE, GEMA, etc. are simply vulgar delinquents, pirates, parasites and thieves… nothing more, nothing less, and that definitely something very bad was happening with the judicial systems of some countries for allowing to these vulgar delinquents to do all that they want.

Fortunately in Brussels exists some justice yet. I hope that all these vulgar pro-copyright delinquents get jail for the rest of their lives.

24 Jul 23, 2009 at 03:38 by Kanine

Ooppss… I forgot to appoint to BREIN in my previous post.

25 Jul 23, 2009 at 03:54 by Turbis

It’s just like putting up a donation fond for starving kids and then instead of giving the money to the kids you just use them for yourself.
It’s kinda ironic how we allways say the music industry is greedy and now we’ve even confirmed that the lobbyists are greedy aswell, this is getting funnier and funnier for every TF blogpost.

26 Jul 23, 2009 at 05:12 by annoyance

I didn’t know pirate was spelt SABAM

27 Jul 23, 2009 at 05:52 by sleeping pill

@25

Although “spelt” is actually spelled correctly it’s definition is somewhat different than what you had intended.

spelt

O.E. spelt, perhaps an early borrowing from L.L. spelta “spelt” (c.400, noted as a foreign word), which is perhaps ult. from PIE base *spel- “to split, to break off” (probably in ref. to the splitting of its husks in threshing), which is related to the root of flint. The word had little currency in Eng., and its history is discontinuous. Widespread in Romanic languages (cf. It. spelta, Sp. espelta, O.Fr. spelte, Mod.Fr. épeautre). The word also is widespread in Gmc. (cf. O.H.G. spelta, Ger. Spelt), and a Gmc. language is perhaps the source of the L.L. word.

28 Jul 23, 2009 at 05:52 by Sol1d

Oh GOOD! Now they can know what it feels like to be raped in the ass! :)

29 Jul 23, 2009 at 06:49 by deadmanamerican

read 3rd paragraph again and replace sabam with u.s. government and everyone will get a clearer picture.

30 Jul 23, 2009 at 07:42 by CCC

next target RIAA

31 Jul 23, 2009 at 09:23 by Anonymous

Death to these assholes.

32 Jul 23, 2009 at 09:35 by hot sex gary

artists make fuck all as it is, this is still just a drop in the ocean, although hopefully a step towards the death of recording companies

33 Jul 23, 2009 at 10:51 by woof

tough, i’m delighted they rip off the artists, if their to lazy or stupid to organize them selves and make sure they get what they feel they’re due, then they get whats given – and they should have no problem with file sharers either if thats the case

34 Jul 23, 2009 at 11:00 by Tim

Copyright Groups in all countries collect money AND less than 10% goes to artists. While Copyright Groups use over 90% of the collected money. It is same in every country.

35 Jul 23, 2009 at 11:14 by Tim

Of course this Copyright Groups in all countries wants more money every year and are collecting more money every year. Copyright Groups workers salary costs are very high. Example leaders and co-leaders in Copyright Groups salary in year is average 1-5 million euros. When normal Copyright Groups workers earns average 400 000-800 000 euros year. Again this is same in all countries. In One Copyright Group can work from many hundreds to many thousands workers.

Example one Copyright Group have 10 000 workers and 1 leader and 4 co-leaders . Leader earns 5 million year when co-leaders 3 million year and workers average earns 600 000 euros so salary costs are about 80 million euros year plus all bonus thins add another 10-20 millions. Totally about 100 million euros salary costs.

All those artist money goes Copyright Groups salary and bonus costs. All examples are from USA, Canada, France, UK, Germany Copyright Groups average salaries.

36 Jul 23, 2009 at 11:15 by Tim

Also Italy and Spain.

37 Jul 23, 2009 at 11:20 by Tim

Copyright Groups leaders and workers are VERY highly overpaid.

38 Jul 23, 2009 at 11:46 by Cordelia

Just proves that downloading is not stealing from the artist —– there wouldn’t have been any sale, and even if there had been, the artist wouldn’t have recieved the money.

39 Jul 23, 2009 at 12:24 by Whu?

This was the best part:
After a play a SABAM-inspector came and demanded that they had to pay because the author of the piece was with SABAM. But the person who they claimed this to was the president of the group and also the author of the play, and he was not affiliated with SABAM…

40 Jul 23, 2009 at 12:28 by albinoblackrabbit

so according to them singing carols is
wrong but stealing money off the artists isn’t?

41 Jul 23, 2009 at 14:21 by rofl

ahah nice.. and you idiots wonder why we download.

WIN for us bitches..

This is official PROOF that artists dont get compensated. OWNED. F*CKING OWNED Neofag and bongwaters and whatever rest of the trolls still on here.

We win we win we win we win hahaha

oh.. are you gonna cry?

sux to loose doesnt it.. well its great to win.

42 Jul 23, 2009 at 14:41 by M-RES

Why am I not surprised by this?

What would be sweet irony is if it turned out they owed Metallica a sh*t load of cash!

43 Jul 23, 2009 at 14:45 by Kanine

33–>”Of course this Copyright Groups in all countries wants more money every year and are collecting more money every year. Copyright Groups workers salary costs are very high. Example leaders and co-leaders in Copyright Groups salary in year is average 1-5 million euros. When normal Copyright Groups workers earns average 400 000-800 000 euros year. Again this is same in all countries. In One Copyright Group can work from many hundreds to many thousands workers.

Example one Copyright Group have 10 000 workers and 1 leader and 4 co-leaders . Leader earns 5 million year when co-leaders 3 million year and workers average earns 600 000 euros so salary costs are about 80 million euros year plus all bonus thins add another 10-20 millions. Totally about 100 million euros salary costs.”
———-

That a big waste of our money for maintaining a bunch of PARASITES that don’t provide any benefit to society.

Why are some governments supporting this organized crime against the society that in addition undermines the rights and civil liberties of the people?

44 Jul 23, 2009 at 14:49 by Kanine

BTW, excellent article

45 Jul 23, 2009 at 14:54 by Kanine

36–>”Just proves that downloading is not stealing from the artist —– there wouldn’t have been any sale, and even if there had been, the artist wouldn’t have recieved the money.”
———–

SHARING music files with others never was (nor will be) piracy.

Piracy is living as PARASITES from the hard work of others, which is EXACTLY that pro-copyright groups as RIAA, SGAE, etc. do.

46 Jul 23, 2009 at 15:09 by Sendaii

Now who’s the thieves?

This is excellent. Groups like this think that they are above the law, and it’s nice to see them brought crashing down. Now, if only we can get the RIAA, IFPI and BPI like this…

47 Jul 23, 2009 at 15:32 by BioShockT81

It’s groups like these that give copyright advocates a bad name. Hopefully they will be replaced by a more proper antipiracy agency.

48 Jul 23, 2009 at 15:34 by Anonymous

“royalties” should apply to kingdoms only, why is it even used in relation to petty entertainers and their slave drivers?

you can say this with a straight face the moment 9-5 jobs give up their sick leave, paid vacation, health plans, dental plans, 401k, retirement funds AND enact a largely performance-based pay system rather than a guaranteed salary (that they still receive even in the event of their product or service turning out to be a complete failure)

until then…LOL

49 Jul 23, 2009 at 15:46 by Sendaii

@45: Not likely. I haven’t seen a single anti-piracy group that can do their job competently, the latest example being BREIN scum.

50 Jul 23, 2009 at 17:05 by Jim Bob

Keep in mind, this is how all these organizations work. This is how they make money. IF they gave it al to the artists, they would make nothing.

51 Jul 23, 2009 at 18:14 by woof

@ 46 Jul 23, 2009 at 15:34 by Anonymous

ah! wondered when fagnonymous would appear after cherry picking his comments to reply to….or splicing and dicing them …as usual you bypass the meat of the article to spew your nonsense…

ever heard of piece work you twat, and believe it or not there IS a world that exisists outside the USA.

52 Jul 23, 2009 at 19:09 by CDR levy of canada

sabam = sadam?

53 Jul 23, 2009 at 22:13 by anonymous in belgium

this fine organization crashed our BBQ and demanded the party hosts(me) to pay up. because we didn’t pay in advance.

54 Jul 24, 2009 at 05:02 by neko

about time some cards were called

55 Jul 24, 2009 at 12:16 by Yar

Stating that these kind of companies as copyright-MAFIA isn’t that far-fetched now is it? :D

56 Jul 24, 2009 at 18:33 by UltraLeetJ

about time! this article is the definite proof of EVERY POINT I’ve been making. Oh, and by the way still wondering where is the so called “intelligent discourse” (AKA trolls). Whats up neoUnstylized, where’s the justification for these atrocities your idols (record labels) have been making? If they are so much of an interest it would be a kind action for them to be defended NOW

57 Jul 24, 2009 at 19:07 by mattias

Q. why’s the economy become so bad in recent times?

A. f***ing copyright groups and middle-men hogging all the money for their own pockets.

58 Jul 25, 2009 at 18:41 by ThePenguinator

Nice to see this :)

59 Jul 25, 2009 at 19:15 by Grok

This is just silly. They’re not satisfied with the amount that they steal normally, I see. They just have to steal from the artists. Hypocritical to the extreme.

60 Jul 26, 2009 at 11:16 by Anon

Oh sh…..60 posts and still no neofag.

61 Jul 26, 2009 at 12:49 by They are the Pirates

sabam = Pirates

Most of us know this here & have known for a long time…

riaa/mpaa = Pirates

Responses are closed

All remaining responses will continue to be archived. Use the TorrentFreak forums if you want to discuss something.