TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

Evil Pirates: Movie Industry Tops $30 Billion Box Office Record

The movie industry certainly had something to celebrate when it announced 2010′s box office revenues. For the first time in history box office grosses worldwide have surpassed the magic $30 billion mark and revenues are up 8 percent compared to 2009. But it’s not all positive news. Despite their achievements, in a surreal plot twist the MPAA is still calling for tougher legislation and strict enforcement to deal with the ever-looming piracy ghost.

pirateThe MPAA has made it very clear that hundreds of thousands of jobs are under threat and the economy is losing billions due to piracy. Illegal downloads, they say, are slowly killing their creative industry.

However, in a time where nearly every MPAA press release deals with piracy concerns, box office revenues are booming worldwide. The MPAA has just announced that in 2010 yet another record was broken at the box office. In the US and Canada last year’s record of $10.6 billion was equalled, while worldwide grosses swelled to a massive $31.8 billion.

“It was a strong year at the movies in 2010. Despite a weak economy, shifting business models, and the ongoing impact of digital theft, we had another record year at the global box office driven by growth outside the U.S. and Canada,” MPAA President Bob Pisano said, commenting on the record-breaking revenues worldwide.

“The continued theft of movies online will have a sustained adverse impact on movie attendance in the coming years,” Pisano added somewhat predictably. “It’s impossible to compete with free.”

Oh really? That last statement, although catchy, makes absolutely no sense in this context.

Does the MPAA chief truly believe that a shaky camcorded version of a movie is somehow depriving movie theaters of visitors? Are there millions of people who prefer watching a low quality camcorded version of a movie over a theater visit simply because they can save a few bucks?

Pisano is comparing apples and oranges here – and he and his buddies have nearly 32 billion reasons in their back pocket to prove it.

It would be the same as saying that a fan of band X won’t go to a concert because he can download a bootleg copy on the Internet instead. Movie piracy is hardly a threat (or competition) to movie theater attendances. If anything holds people back from spending a few dollars on a movie it’s probably the insane security measures that have been implemented in recent years.

Still, the MPAA is confident that piracy is affecting box office revenues, so it will therefore continue to push for new legislation and enforcement tools.

“We will continue to work with our industry partners to fight for common sense ways, through legislative, enforcement and legal avenues, to vigilantly protect the creativity at the heart of our industry from theft,” Pisano says.

One of the focuses of the MPAA has been to reduce camcording in movie theaters, but one has to question whether the investments that are made in this area are worth it. Do movie theater employees really have to be equipped with night vision goggles? Are metal detectors, emotion recognition and advanced audio watermarks really needed to pinpoint pirates?

It is almost as if the MPAA and other anti-piracy outfits continue this “piracy theater” just to guarantee and justify their jobs and those of their comrades. Make no mistake, anti-piracy is big business. There are dozens of anti-piracy outfits, copyright protection vendors and lobby groups that each earn millions of dollars merely because of this supposed piracy threat.

Something to think about.

Related Posts

Previous Post | Next Post

  • Zip

    Makes sense, they’re disappointed that they didn’t make 100 billion. They obviously feel they deserve it (they did make Skyline after all).

    • Zip

      It’s ironic that they argue that pirates are fueled by a sense of “entitlement.”

    • http://techlooser.com Sphinx Khan

      Greed on steroids :P

      http://techlooser.com

    • Baronluigi

      More of that, they think that everything they create would be perfectly sold, and any person with money would be a customer for sure, just because he can spend money.

  • TerribleTony

    Sounds to me like the MPAA are continuing their customer guilt-trip tactic, why stop now? It seems to be working.

  • Pingback: Tweets that mention Evil Pirates: Movie Industry Tops $30 Billion Box Office Record | TorrentFreak -- Topsy.com

  • bootytape.com

    Movie theater sales shouldn’t be hurt at all. DVD sales could be hurt, but not if the fans want to support there favorite movies. I understand the MPAA want to scare people into thinking watching movies for free is a bad thing. They want to treat movies like they’re illegal drugs. As if people around the world are dying inside because they haven’t paid 15 to 30 dollars for there entertainment.

    Then when clear proof is presented to them that the fans are supporting still, they want to brush it off. Maybe they think the word “3D” in every poorly plotted title saved them this time.

    I don’t think so, it’s probably because in hard times people just want to escape and not think about the big issues. The MPAA is better off settling down, because if pirates started looking at there governments instead of movies, there would be revolution instead of downloads.

    • bootytape.com

      *their entertainment

      *their government’s

  • Violated

    Their main gain was increased boxoffice sales in Asia. The US on the other hand saw little change over 2009.

    I find it funny they claim record breaking sales then they claim pirates are responsible for their small return.

    Not untrue. File sharing makes for good advertising and people value quality including the big screen and 3D.

    But sure all the time you are missing even $1 scream away. Your greed is well known.

  • Damien

    I wonder if the MPAA is going to cry about “piracy” when Pirates of the Carribean 4 will be released…

  • Foff

    Have these ftards never heard of promotion. The movie industry made that much because of downloading not in spite of it. If I download the movie and it will never be a crappy cam version I will tell friends and family if the movie is good and they will spread the word. Word of mouth is the most powerful advertising anything can have.

    The phenomenon of downloading accelerates this by many times as most who get the word will either rent,buy or see it in the theater if it is still there because while I download most of my friends and family and others I know do not.

    • Lynx

      I think the problem is that 90% of movies released are rehashed garbage. Allowing for a downloaded preview of garbage will remove the ability to trick people into spending $15 for a movie ticket. If they would move the focus from piracy toward something worth the time.. I don’t know, say… Originality, then it might not be such a big issue. But I can tell you right now, if I would have downloaded the last few movies I spent $30+ on and the theater, I wouldn’t have went! It sucks leaving a movie feeling like you just got punched in the nads.

      • http://www.facebook.com/eric.boehm Jack Murdock

        Are you mentally retarded? The best movies always get pirated the most. It’s not just a “downloaded preview.” It’s a way for people to get out of paying for the DVD.

        Im pretty sure if they didn’t like the movie in theaters they aren’t going to waste their time downloading it. Plus, there are these things called movie reviews. Saying that you don’t want to be fooled is a poor excuse at best and it just makes you look tremendously lazy. If a movie gets unanimously poor reviews, I doubt anyone is going to be terribly impressed by it and now they should have no reason to download it.

        • Violated

          I cant speak for everyone but I buy the movies I enjoy. My latest two were Predators and Kick-Ass.

          Since I have well over 300 legal DVD movies here then I guess I am evidence that file sharers are the biggest fans who spend the most.

          I sure never want to purchase a bad movie though.

          I do visit the cinema less rarely. My last trip was to see Avatar Extended Edition in 3D.

          I loved that movie so much after download I both purchased the DVD and made sure I did not miss this 2nd opportunity to see it in 3D.

          The main advantage of file sharing beyond weeding out the rubbish (like Machete) is exposing myself to titles I would not normally consider paying for. And sure enough I have gone on to purchase unusual titles like Crank 1&2.

          Just yesterday I watched my download of Tangled. That is also sure to be a future gift to a niece or nephew.

          So where is the damage from file sharing here? It seems more to their gain if you ask me. And I am quite vocal and help to advertise good movies.

        • Ryzzo

          Calling people retarded is probably a great way to help them see your point of view…

          Piracy hurts bad movies, and only bad movies. People still pay to see good movies in theaters and buy the DVD or Bluray even if they download it first. I will often download a movie to preview it if I think it might be iffy, but if I like it, I will just as often go see it in the theater or buy a copy of it for home or both. Why is this such a hard concept to grasp? I, like most “pirates”, have absolutely no problem paying for quality material that I enjoy, and I have hundreds of DVD’s to prove it. What I do have a problem with is paying my hard earned money for crap.

        • No1uno

          NO, Are you mentally retarded?? Do you honestly expect that everyone looks at movies with the same attitude of these lame ass reviewers. Or that just because some clown who claims to be a professional, liked it then EVERYONE ELSE will also? Either same something intelligent or STFU!

        • Donotreply

          ‘Are you mentally retarded?’

          Given your posting history across this site; this is a new low for you and certainly not how you should be addressing other people to have an intelligent discussion (how intelligent the discussion may be is subjective).

          While you may strongly disagree with the views Lynx (and any other posters on this site), I do not deny you the right to post such views (“I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.” – François-Marie Arouet whose pen name was Voltaire), however I hope it is not too much to ask of you to least apply an equal amount of responsibility to your posting rights and keep it civil without resorting to name calling and other disrespectful remarks.

          Thank you in advance.

          Moving on;

          ‘The best movies always get pirated the most.’

          I counter claim that statement in that the best movies are also the ones that generate the most sales, some of which may actually have occurred from the ‘word of mouth’ generated by said downloaded copies of movies (I know I did buy a few movies on the odd occasion (second hand sales though, I’m not going to directly fund movie studios for their lawsuits etc. as cataloged by TorrentFreak and other sites) by the word of mouth from friends who downloaded something and liked it enough to tell me about it).

          ‘It’s not just a “downloaded preview.” It’s a way for people to get out of paying for the DVD.’

          Not always true, as has already been argued numerous times when this issue is brought up.
          Sure there are some people who do download stuff for the sake of it or to avoid paying but with or without downloads these ‘sales’ would never occur as such people wouldn’t spend the money on movies etc regardless.
          Beyond that minority, the larger majority that can be interpreted as people who are ‘getting out of paying for a DVD’ or a movie ticket may actually choose not to have purchased a copy of the movie because well it simply did not entertain them (those same friends have helped me avoid a few duds =) ).

          Those could have been possible (not probable as trialing a movie via a download would occur less often were there fees attached to said downloads themselves) DVD sales that thanks to downloads many dud purchases have been avoided (and hopefully in turn discourage movie studios from making more of these duds). No one likes to get burned when they purchase a movie and wind up with one of those large amounts of ‘rehashed garbage’.

          ‘Im pretty sure if they didn’t like the movie in theaters they aren’t going to waste their time downloading it.’

          My sole purchases of movies are via 2nd hand markets. I can count the amount the times I’ve been to a cinema on one hand.
          I found from that that I get more value in my money by purchasing a DVD/Blu Ray of a movie and watching it from the comfort of my own home than I do going to the cinema (sure I have to wait longer and avoid sites that may spoil the storyline but the financial and creature comfort trade offs are more than worth the little effort spent in such fashion).
          I doubt I’m the only person to choose not to attend movie cinemas; so I could see how other people may in turn choose instead to download movies to make informed purchasing decisions (or in my case, piggy back off of friends who do such downloads).

          ‘Plus, there are these things called movie reviews.’

          Like other things (computer hardware with nVidia vs AMD GPU reviews, Intel vs AMD CPU reviews for a pair of quick examples); reviews can be biased to meet an hidden agenda which doesn’t necessarily serve any benefit to it’s readers.
          Due to such bias being prevalent on some sites I could see quite easily why a download of the movie itself would be a better alternative.

          Where bias is not present (albeit deliberately), the reviewers views and opinions of the movie may on occasion be a little short on information or have the minor mistake that can mislead readers as well (to err is human).

          Finally; the biggest mistake any reviewer can make, is the occasional spoiler that may actually give away the movie’s main plots in the story that can kind of ruin the whole experience if people actually go to see the movie (I know I’d have been peeved ~1980 if someone spilled the beans about Darth Vader being Luke Skywalkers father as revealed in The Empire Strikes Back [you've had ~30 years to watch it now so I don't think people will crucify me for that spoiler =P ] ).

          ‘Saying that you don’t want to be fooled is a poor excuse at best and it just makes you look tremendously lazy. ‘

          See above regarding review bias, poor quality reviews and add to that the occasional misleading bits of advertising (while it would be interesting to see, it would be possible to chop up Star Wars into a sci-fi drama [the whole Han and Leia angle, Luke and Vader's estranged father-son relationship] that would certainly disappoint people that prefer to watch drama flicks over peeps like myself where Action and plenty of it is what I like to see [plenty of that in Star Wars =P ] ).

          ‘If a movie gets unanimously poor reviews, I doubt anyone is going to be terribly impressed by it and now they should have no reason to download it. ‘

          Review bias, people trolling threads (more prevalent with independent films than the AAA budget films [some may occasionally be movie studios shills fwiw] ) and general misleading advertising can also do that (some duds on say the IMDB occasionally rank higher than they should so it works in both directions here) though poor reviews won’t stop some people from watching them regardless (the serial downloaders) or the movie simply fits a little too well in a niché market for mainstream viewers.

          So in short, there are plenty of reasons why people download movies with some of those covered above (some actually being more of a positive than a negative for a few of these movies) so downloading a movie is not simply a ‘get out of paying for it’ ticket event (just as every download is not a lost sale).

        • Ninja

          Lengthy but wise. It summarizes what is said and seen here on TF and for the ones that are willing to see.

        • Donotreply

          Thanks for taking the time to write the nice bit of feedback =)

          I have a nasty habit of making lengthy replies (believe me it took me a little bit of time to write out as well to try and get it right =S ), however I have found that whenever I make a short one it tends to get dismissed out of hand and/or attacked in such a way to attempt to drown it out and drag attention away from it (a “you can’t handle the truth” moment as I have come to think of them).

          Yes it is a lengthy read but I hope I didn’t make too many mistakes within it (to err is human), however a bonus is that due to it’s size it will attract more attention than a simple “copyright infringement is not theft” post.

        • Donotreply

          ‘Are you mentally retarded?’

          Given your posting history across this site; this is a new low for you and certainly not how you should be addressing other people to have an intelligent discussion (how intelligent the discussion may be is subjective).

          While you may strongly disagree with the views Lynx (and any other posters on this site), I do not deny you the right to post such views (“I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.” – François-Marie Arouet whose pen name was Voltaire), however I hope it is not too much to ask of you to least apply an equal amount of responsibility to your posting rights and keep it civil without resorting to name calling and other disrespectful remarks.

          Thank you in advance.

          Moving on;

          ‘The best movies always get pirated the most.’

          I counter claim that statement in that the best movies are also the ones that generate the most sales, some of which may actually have occurred from the ‘word of mouth’ generated by said downloaded copies of movies (I know I did buy a few movies on the odd occasion (second hand sales though, I’m not going to directly fund movie studios for their lawsuits etc. as cataloged by TorrentFreak and other sites) by the word of mouth from friends who downloaded something and liked it enough to tell me about it).

          ‘It’s not just a “downloaded preview.” It’s a way for people to get out of paying for the DVD.’

          Not always true, as has already been argued numerous times when this issue is brought up.
          Sure there are some people who do download stuff for the sake of it or to avoid paying but with or without downloads these ‘sales’ would never occur as such people wouldn’t spend the money on movies etc regardless.
          Beyond that minority, the larger majority that can be interpreted as people who are ‘getting out of paying for a DVD’ or a movie ticket may actually choose not to have purchased a copy of the movie because well it simply did not entertain them (those same friends have helped me avoid a few duds =) ).

          Those could have been possible (not probable as trialing a movie via a download would occur less often were there fees attached to said downloads themselves) DVD sales that thanks to downloads many dud purchases have been avoided (and hopefully in turn discourage movie studios from making more of these duds). No one likes to get burned when they purchase a movie and wind up with one of those large amounts of ‘rehashed garbage’.

          ‘Im pretty sure if they didn’t like the movie in theaters they aren’t going to waste their time downloading it.’

          My sole purchases of movies are via 2nd hand markets. I can count the amount the times I’ve been to a cinema on one hand.
          I found from that that I get more value in my money by purchasing a DVD/Blu Ray of a movie and watching it from the comfort of my own home than I do going to the cinema (sure I have to wait longer and avoid sites that may spoil the storyline but the financial and creature comfort trade offs are more than worth the little effort spent in such fashion).
          I doubt I’m the only person to choose not to attend movie cinemas; so I could see how other people may in turn choose instead to download movies to make informed purchasing decisions (or in my case, piggy back off of friends who do such downloads).

          ‘Plus, there are these things called movie reviews.’

          Like other things (computer hardware with nVidia vs AMD GPU reviews, Intel vs AMD CPU reviews for a pair of quick examples); reviews can be biased to meet an hidden agenda which doesn’t necessarily serve any benefit to it’s readers.
          Due to such bias being prevalent on some sites I could see quite easily why a download of the movie itself would be a better alternative.

          Where bias is not present (albeit deliberately), the reviewers views and opinions of the movie may on occasion be a little short on information or have the minor mistake that can mislead readers as well (to err is human).

          Finally; the biggest mistake any reviewer can make, is the occasional spoiler that may actually give away the movie’s main plots in the story that can kind of ruin the whole experience if people actually go to see the movie (I know I’d have been peeved ~1980 if someone spilled the beans about Darth Vader being Luke Skywalkers father as revealed in The Empire Strikes Back [you've had ~30 years to watch it now so I don't think people will crucify me for that spoiler =P ] ).

          ‘Saying that you don’t want to be fooled is a poor excuse at best and it just makes you look tremendously lazy. ‘

          See above regarding review bias, poor quality reviews and add to that the occasional misleading bits of advertising (while it would be interesting to see, it would be possible to chop up Star Wars into a sci-fi drama [the whole Han and Leia angle, Luke and Vader's estranged father-son relationship] that would certainly disappoint people that prefer to watch drama flicks over peeps like myself where Action and plenty of it is what I like to see [plenty of that in Star Wars =P ] ).

          ‘If a movie gets unanimously poor reviews, I doubt anyone is going to be terribly impressed by it and now they should have no reason to download it. ‘

          Review bias, people trolling threads (more prevalent with independent films than the AAA budget films [some may occasionally be movie studios shills fwiw] ) and general misleading advertising can also do that (some duds on say the IMDB occasionally rank higher than they should so it works in both directions here) though poor reviews won’t stop some people from watching them regardless (the serial downloaders) or the movie simply fits a little too well in a niché market for mainstream viewers.

          So in short, there are plenty of reasons why people download movies with some of those covered above (some actually being more of a positive than a negative for a few of these movies) so downloading a movie is not simply a ‘get out of paying for it’ ticket event (just as every download is not a lost sale).

        • Ninja

          Oh Murdockie you silly, movie reviews can be bought. And even the serious ones could mean shiet if you are looking for good entertainment since I’ve seen bad reviews about entertaining movies. And good reviews about amazingly shietty movies.

          But wait, I’m replying to an idiot. You keep repeating over and over the same crap (that pirates are evil, they download to get away without paying and blablabla) when it’s clear that it is a partial truth that doesn’t apply to every single file sharer.

          Oh and yes, ppl will download crappy movies given the proper publicity efforts put on it. But if you see the torrent in the long term you’ll have a huge spike when the torrent is first released with a huge drop in the downloads in the following days simply because word will spread that the movie is a waste of time (and money, pun not intended).

          So please, do us a favor, stfu.

        • Baronluigi

          Lot of people (at least in Spain, my country) downloads things because the are available, not because they like them.

  • Blablb

    Stupid USA run and controlled by jEwS. This would never happen if they get the bAn.

  • Blablb

    Stupid USA run and controlled by jEwS. This would never happen if they get the bAn.

  • Paul

    Well, why doesn’t it surprise me. We all know they are making billions of $’s profit, so what they are blaming piracy for i don’t know. $30 billion, that could feed a third world country for years and they are still whining it’s not enough. I can’t understand the pure greed of some people, it makes me sick.

  • Paul

    Well, why doesn’t it surprise me. We all know they are making billions of $’s profit, so what they are blaming piracy for i don’t know. $30 billion, that could feed a third world country for years and they are still whining it’s not enough. I can’t understand the pure greed of some people, it makes me sick.

    • Violated

      I personally think they are jealous of the computer games market that dwarfs their $30 billion.

    • Ninja

      They believe that a download means lost sales of movie tickets, dvds, merchandise and whatever you can imagine they delusion about. So yeah, they are sad because they didn’t make 1 trillion in revenues.

      That and MAFIAA needs to justify it’s existence.

  • -Silicon Valley Is Gonna Burn-

    Box Office Sales account for only 20% of the traditional combined revenue of a film. The other 80% is being lost to piracy and counterfeiting. This current surge at the Box Office will do little or nothing in the grand scheme of things. The Copyleft “Spin Machine” is at it again, twisting facts and reality to support it flawed adolescent ideologies.

    • http://disqus.com/ Rob8urcakes

      Another deluded troll who spreads the erroneous propaganda of the greed-fueled MAFIAA.

      Time to wake up and smell those freshly printed $$$ we filesharers give you.
      Stop attacking your own customer base you freakin’ bunch of fascist DUMMIES.

    • Anonymous

      I see the MPAA trolls are at it again, making shit up and lying through their teeth in an attempt to dupe suckers into believing that filesharing is a threat the film industry.

      Riddle me this, stooge. How can box-office revenue be increasing if filesharing is destroying the box-office? Answer: It can’t. You and MPAA President Bob Pisano are both liars. The numbers prove that filesharing doesn’t inflict any real damage, so you have to invent some reason why box-office sales suddenly don’t count anymore. According to you, 80% of “traditional combined revenue” is being lost to piracy and counterfeiting. That’s around 100 billion dollars, and is completely absurd. You must have been asleep in Shill Training Class when the subject was how to make people believe a lie. Rule number one, it’s supposed to be plausible. Your insane fantasy that filesharing is preventing home video sales, movie rentals, and broadcasting fees from generating A HUNDRED BILLION DOLLARS IN REVENUE ANNUALLY is a little too much for anyone over the age of about seven years old to buy.

      I give your corporate trolling 1 out of 5 stars. Go hang your head in shame.

    • Anonymous

      “”"”Box Office Sales account for only 20% of the traditional combined revenue of a film. “”"”

      WTF.. troll… with a misleading message. ? I’m gonna RiP that to shreds…

      1) “” traditional “” ..
      The traditional movie is a box office SHOW. Get it ?… A SHOW.
      Recordings on TV/Tape/Dvd/internet are a newer (less entertaining ) way to view the MOVIE SHOW.
      The FACT that these RECORDINGS can be endlessly reproduced at Zero cost makes them worthless… in the REAL world.

      2) “” traditional combined revenue “”
      Traditional…. As in that moment in history…. When recordings where sold for massive profit ? Or before recordings where ever sold ?
      Seems to me , that you mean”" traditional combined revenue “” is that moment in history.

      lastly..

      3) “”Box Office Sales account for only 20%”"
      WTF…. it sould be 100%.
      We are prepared to pay to go to see a SHOW. Big screen , popcorn , friends , an experience.

      Why would anyone WAN’T to buy/rent a movie ? ?

      TV IS better by miles. FACT…. TV

      TV has hurt “”"the movie industry”" more than filesharing ever can.
      Why the fuk would I go rent a Movie ? ? I have over 200 chanels showing some really good shows.

      FFS… i remember when there was only a few TV channels…
      you had to rent a movie to see something you wanted to watch.
      Now fta/freeview is adding lots more FREE tv channels… less dvds will be sold/rented.

      TV killed the sale of DVD’s. DEAL WITH IT….

      TV is the competition of the movie industry… TV is kicking your ass…

    • Ninja

      Yes, because 30 years ago there was no file sharing and the revenue was 80% higher and suddenly, when the internetz took over you’ve lost 80% in revenue since then. Oh wait….

      • Anonymous

        35 years ago… There wasn’t even VHS or betamax… http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VHS
        So 100% of movie sales where Box Office….
        Renting or buying movies is not the traditional “movie industry”. Going to the cinema is.

        • Anonymous

          Before VHS/Betamax there was the home cine projector. Kind of hard to get anything unofficial that way but sure enough along came the cine recorder as well for home and holiday recordings.

          I still have that one in the loft along with most other obsolete hardware. Funny how it is hard to throw away something you once enjoyed.

          So 35 years ago we still had home movie clips. They were often more enjoyable than what was on the local 3 TV stations back then. Illness I used to fear then along with episodes of Mr & Mrs. I cant ever forget that theme tune.

  • -Silicon Valley Is Gonna Burn-

    Box Office Sales account for only 20% of the traditional combined revenue of a film. The other 80% is being lost to piracy and counterfeiting. This current surge at the Box Office will do little or nothing in the grand scheme of things. The Copyleft “Spin Machine” is at it again, twisting facts and reality to support it flawed adolescent ideologies.

  • This

    im going to share 210 movies somewhere ….

  • Anonymous

    Just fuels the fire even more and makes me want to get a Seedbox alot sooner then next month. Fly the jolly roger , up those sails man those cannons its time we hit the high seas and plunder us some culture.

  • Watcher

    Honestly, I evaluate Movies, Games, Music via download. If something is really great, I go support it through purchasing a better, higher quality copy. If I couldn’t download, I wouldn’t go see it in the first place.

    • Ninja

      I’m with you. Specially for games. I download, play till the end then I buy it. If there weren’t full downloads I wouldn’t buy shiet. Actually, I wouldn’t know about my favorite group.

  • Omg

    the thing i don’t get is why are we so few to see this ? its so big its gonna explode in the world face soon !!

  • http://www.google.com/profiles/108037014675127192334 Binary

    As a writer and director, I say this:

    Film companies have too much money and are obsessed with having more.

    • Copyright Monopoly Censorship

      Right, Binary.

      Plus the financiers fight for their propaganda distribution monopoly (TV).
      Copyright is a prime Censorship device.

      When the Kings couldn’t stop the tide of people printing books,
      they started to organise monopolies. See
      Privilege and Property. Essays on the History of Copyright (2010).

      • http://disqus.com/ Rob8urcakes

        Is it copyrighted? lol
        Seriously though, got a d/l address for it?

        • Copyright Monopoly Censorship

          It shows up first in Worshipful Google search for the title in “” torrent.

  • Qqqq

    They are thinking in the future, when everyone wll have a theater at home.A very big LED TV is already not expensive at all.

  • Qqqq

    They are thinking in the future, when everyone wll have a theater at home.A very big LED TV is already not expensive at all.

    • Ninja

      Then Box revenues might get hit. But then again, why not release the DVD/Pay-per-view version along with the cinema version so ppl can choose where to watch?

    • Ninja

      Then Box revenues might get hit. But then again, why not release the DVD/Pay-per-view version along with the cinema version so ppl can choose where to watch?

  • Neotoasty

    But is that gonna stop them from suing? Hell no! So this is just big-deal news for them.

    Again, not surprised. What’s sad is that there’s a giant group of them, and the sheep followers. And a small few ten thousand of us against them. =

    As long as money is involved, nothing will stop them at going out of their way to do what they claim. Even if it means at the expense of everyone’s rights.

  • Pirate

    I dled that crappy cam version of Paul that is floating about, next day i went into work told my boss that its a @#!$in hilarious movie, he asked if he could get a copy of it, i told him it was a crappy cam and he should wait, he just said “f#@k it, I’ll just goto cinema and watch it with my girl this weekend”

    So there you go, you lost 1 sale from me, but gained 2 other sales from someone else, because I pirated it.

    I am prolly the biggest pirate out of everyone I know, I really know no other person who dl’s as much as me, when they need something(anything ;-) ) they usally come to me for it.

  • SteRipper

    The MPAA needs to realize that if they stop trying to stop a threat that doesn’t exist, they would have more money to wipe their butts with.

  • http://www.facebook.com/thatdamnedkid Brent Andersen

    Helps when tickets cost almost $15.

  • AnarchyNow

    $30 billions that are wasted into emptiness instead of being used for actual real people welfare,
    Nuke U$A Now!

  • There is

    all you pirates saying you go to the movies and spend money on dvd’s are just going to hell to burn for the rest of eternity, you are no better than a rapist or a thief who steals someones entire paycheck leaving them to starve.

    thats what the MAFIAA wants you to believe

  • ndmushroom

    Has anyone actually done a study on how many jobs and revenue piracy creates? The issue raised in the last paragraph of the article is a very interesting one, and it would be nice to have some statistics on how much money is spent on lobbying, anti-piracy organizations, lawyers and other judicial expenses, developing monitoring and filtering systems, ads and other “educational” material, copy-protection technologies, research and statistics on piracy, special police taskforces, specialist panels and consultations etc. Even more interesting would be to know how much of this money is coming from public funds (as in “the taxpayer”).

  • SOLIDUS

    When will these idiots get it, piracy in the long run doesn’t hurt. Fucking retarded idiots!

  • Anon

    Evil Pirates: Movie Industry Tops $30 Billion Box Office Record

    Does not compute, pirates are pirating more and more movies yet they are still making a profit. Some would say maybe piracy really isnt as big as they make it out to be…..

  • Peter

    It’s a Jewish thing, think nazi hunters.

  • Big Fan of Hollywood Jews

    Re: Try before you buy movie pirates

    This ain’t VIDEO GAMES, movie companies use all the money they get to sue pirates.

  • Big Fan of Hollywood Jews

    Re: Try before you buy movie pirates

    This ain’t VIDEO GAMES, movie companies use all the money they get to sue pirates.

  • not even one

    I don’t give a penny to movie/music industry. I could live without them!

  • Chris

    Fuck this, I’m not going to the movies again. I’d rather not watch a movie at all than support these people.

    • reedit

      What ? You don’t want to support Charlie Sheen getting high and drunk using your money ? C’mon man :))

      http://www.getaseedbox.com/

  • xennex

    I don’t buy the “the economy is losing money” argument. All that money is spent elsewhere. If you stop fighting the War on Drugs (for instance) with its multi-billion dollar budget, you lose jobs, but the jobs resurface elsewhere as the government has more to spend. Same with piracy. Real value lies in the products and services being produced. You don’t get more movies created by having a higher movie attendance. Not a lot more. You get the same movies with higher revenues. A lot of money changes hands, yes. But the amount of products/services created does not grow significantly. Thus, the economy does not benefit significantly. And the money goes elsewhere.

  • BTGuard - BitTorrent Anonymously

NewsBits

Even more news...

  • The Pirate Bay Isn’t Down Completely, Just Having a Few Issues

    Twitter and Facebook, not to mention the TorrentFreak inbox, are currently alive with complaints that The...

  • Pirate Bay Founder Gottfrid Svartholm on Freedom of Speech

    Freedom of speech is a highly valued commodity, but should people be allowed to say whatever...

  • Blu-ray Anti-Piracy Tech Stops Discs and Promotes Purchases

    An anti-piracy system present in all official Blu-ray players since 2012 has received a fresh update...

  • Foxtel Breeds Pirates by Locking Up Game of Thrones

    One of the main reasons why people turn to piracy is the lack of legal alternatives....

  • UK Student Admits Breaching Sony Copyrights With Leak of PS3 SDK

    Last year an Internet user known as El Nomeo leaked version 3.70 of Sony’s Playstation3 SDK...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

PopularArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.