TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

Five File-Sharing Predictions for 2009

What will happen to BitTorrent users and their favorite sites in the new year? What will happen to the music industry’s new efforts to combat piracy with the help of ISPs, and what about efforts to legalize file sharing? We asked guest columnist Janko Roettgers for his predictions for 2009.

Granted, making predictions is easy. Being right is much harder, but I’m going to give it a try anyway. Please check back in a year and see how well I did, and feel free to share your own thoughts about what this year might bring in the comments.

File-sharing will continue to grow.

Okay, this is a no-brainer. Torrent sites like the Pirate Bay have been showing huge growth rates every single year, and there is no reason to assume that 2009 will be any different. Except maybe for the fact that the global economic crisis will continue to force consumers to spend less. And what’s an easy way to save some dough? Exactly, free music, movies and TV shows. File sharing is going to get a big recession bump in 2009.

One of the biggest torrent sites will close down.

Just don’t ask me which one. Rights holders will continue to put pressure on site admins and their hosting providers in 2009, just as they did in 2008, and at least one well-known name will fold under this pressure. For a few days it will look like the file sharing world is going to end, but then it will be business as usual again.

The RIAA’s new three-strikes policy will fail.

The music industry announced just two weeks ago that it will stop its mass lawsuit campaign and instead cooperate with ISPs to punish file sharers. The Wall Street Journal reported at the time about “agreements in principle” with an unspecified number of unnamed ISPs that “may cut off” net access for repeat offenders. Or not, one should add. ISPs don’t like to lose customers over a few traded songs, which is why a similar deal in the UK still doesn’t include any enforcement measures half a year after it was struck. The same will happen in the US. In fact, some smaller ISPs might even get a boost by promising that they won’t disconnect customers over P2P.

P4P will actually work.

The somewhat controversial technology that aims to mitigate the effect of P2P transfers on ISPs’ networks has proven to work pretty well in field tests, but those were limited to a single video file provided by personal file sharing start-up Pando. 2009 will bring us some first mass-scale implementations, and I suspect that some of you will start to use P4P-assisted file transfers without even noticing, which is how good infrastructure technology should work.

We will all become socialists.

The uproar was huge when Warner Music first expressed support for a flat fee for legal P2P music sharing in the spring of 2008. Techcrunch called the idea extortion, others warned of socialism, big government and an unfair music tax. Then the global financial markets hit rock bottom, countries like the US started to nationalize banks left and right, and people warmed up to the fact that government intervention and taxation aren’t always bad things. This will continue in 09.

We’ll see billions of tax payer’s money spent on infrastructure projects and governments taking stakes in major industries. In a way, we will all become socialists, if only to wait out the end of the crisis. And in the process, we will warm up to the idea of collective licensing. Now, it’s unclear whether the record labels will actually come through and start first blanket licensing trials by the end of the year, but I predict that consumers will be ready for it. Because really, who will object to five bucks a month in light of billions spend on bailouts?

Janko Roettgers is a Los Angeles-based journalist. He is also the editor of P2P Blog.

Related Posts

Previous Post | Next Post

  • Zoness

    Yay socialism…not

  • justdoit

    "The uproar was huge when Warner Music first expressed support for a flat fee for legal P2P music sharing in the spring of 2008."

    It is the blindingly obvious solution (ie by far the best compromise on offer, and credit to Warner for proposing such a sensible scheme). I would very happily pay a monthly fee for unlimited legal access to all p2p files (provided the bulk of that fee went to the actual artists, not to their contractual overlords).

    The copyright industry have nothing left to lose, and they will get a lot more back under such a scheme than they are under the current failed and doomed regime. The sooner they accept the realities of 21st century technology and economics, the better off they, and everybody else, will be.

    And Techcrunch are just juvenile fucking idiots, seriously out of touch with the real world.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/EZEE EZEE

      Paying a fee per month is just ludicrous, and comes up to the same RIAA racket of pay up or we sue you, except this time its a smaller amount by MANYYYYY people.

      As has been said before, what about the toher industries, whats to stop them from asking for a payout as well?

      What aobut people like my granny who does not know how to download anything (despite my repeated attempts to teach her)… does she have to pay a tax as well? for what? for more blow for the industry execs? 7th Ferrari?

      If a music tax is ever out, we will fight it till our last breath in every way we can.

      http://www.eZee.se

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/Roze Roze

      "provided the bulk of that fee went to the actual artists, not to their contractual overlords"
      Of course, they would never agree to that.

      Moreover, if you take indie artists into account, who are not signed at any label at all and rather just trade their files through P2P, it would be very hard to pay many artists since one would need to track them down before one could send money to them. And what about everything that is non-music?

      It is a good idea that is difficult to implement.

    • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/Roze Roze

      "provided the bulk of that fee went to the actual artists, not to their contractual overlords"
      Of course, they would never agree to that.

      Moreover, if you take indie artists into account, who are not signed at any label at all and rather just trade their files through P2P, it would be very hard to pay many artists since one would need to track them down before one could send money to them. It would also be difficult to do the detailed investigations necessary in order to prove who was actually the one who created the music. And what about everything that is non-music?

      It is an okay idea that is difficult to implement. Much better just to extend "fair use" to everything non-commercial. The original creators still have their rights to use their works commercially.

    • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/Roze Roze

      "provided the bulk of that fee went to the actual artists, not to their contractual overlords"
      Of course, they would never agree to that.

      Moreover, if you take indie artists into account, who are not signed at any label at all and rather just trade their files through P2P, it would be very hard to pay many artists since one would need to track them down before one could send money to them. It would also be difficult to do the detailed investigations necessary in order to prove who was actually the one who created the music. And what about everything that is non-music?

      It is an okay idea that is difficult to implement. Much better just to extend "fair use" to everything non-commercial. The original creators still have their rights to use their works commercially.

    • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/Roze Roze

      "provided the bulk of that fee went to the actual artists, not to their contractual overlords"
      Of course, they would never agree to that.

      Moreover, if you take indie artists into account, who are not signed at any label at all and rather just trade their files through P2P, it would be very hard to pay many artists since one would need to track them down before one could send money to them. It would also be difficult to do the detailed investigations necessary in order to prove who was actually the one who created the music. What about uploading it to people who have not yet paid it? What about creating one's own derivative work from the music? And what about everything that is non-music?

      It is an okay idea that is difficult to implement. Much better just to extend "fair use" to everything non-commercial. The original creators still have their rights to use their works commercially.

      Roze

  • alan

    Might want to fix your last link to p2pblog there ;)

  • anon

    i bet one of the music trackers will get shut down :s
    i hope not though

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/jasperwillem jasperwillem

    [quote]One of the biggest torrent sites will close down.[/quote]

    As long as we have torrentz

    *

    [quote]ISPs don’t like to lose customers over a few traded songs, which is why a similar deal in the UK still doesn’t include any enforcement measures half a year after it was struck. The same will happen in the US[/quote]

    When it is written in law, even small ISP's cant get around it.

  • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/jasperwillem jasperwillem

    [QUOTE]One of the biggest torrent sites will close down.[/QUOTE]

    As long as we have torrentz

    *

    [quote]ISPs don’t like to lose customers over a few traded songs, which is why a similar deal in the UK still doesn’t include any enforcement measures half a year after it was struck. The same will happen in the US[/quote]

    When it is written in law, even small ISP's cant get around it.

  • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/jasperwillem jasperwillem

    @ "One of the biggest torrent sites will close down."

    As long as we have torrentz

    *

    @ "ISPs don’t like to lose customers over a few traded songs, which is why a similar deal in the UK still doesn’t include any enforcement measures half a year after it was struck. The same will happen in the US"

    When it is written in law, even small ISP's cant get around it.

  • stab

    The collective licensing is a horrible idea. It's literally paying record labels for doing nothing. Paying the middleman $5 a month for the privilege of going around him. It's nonsense.

  • h00dlum

    oh well.. back to telnetting to old style bbs's

  • That guy

    P4P wont take off. The entire concept is flawed. It's a ploy.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Roze Roze

    Collective licensing would work only if industry were the only creators of music. It takes out the independent (or "indie") music creators.

    The actual obvious solution is to extend "fair use" to include all non-commercial usage and non-commercial derivative works.

  • http://www.darksiderg.com/forums The P!nk Pr!nce

    Couldn’t agree more esecially about the retarded 3 strike rule and saddly about the closing of a site!

    Oh Well the BitTorrent Hydra will live on!

    P.S the link doesn’t work for me too!

  • http://www.kruhm.org zanfr

    lets hope the 3 strikes doesnt catch on in france either… where people actually pay a levy on blank media to be allowed to copy and yet get the axe when they do…
    i suspect that ISPs that will honor any sort of 3 strikes scheme will quickly run out of business… talk about the “digital france” sarkozy wants :D lol

  • lol

    who cares for torrent indexes, there are so many of them. the real bottle neck are trackers. how many public ones are there?

  • WEBmadman

    "Unfortunately. Over the next 3 years the net will be slowly destroyed. "

    I've been hearing that for the last 15 years, almost believed it for the first 10, but now, I'm cautiously optimistic- too many people have too much invested in it.

    The blank media tariff scheme like the one they have here in Canada is bogus- I'm an "indie" artist who gets to pay big label artist every time I make a cd of my own music (I know, I know, there's a red tape trail I can plow through to get it back, but it's not easy, with me having to prove it's my own music…). Nor do I see that approach as socialist- that would be more along the lines of directly supporting the artist within a social context- allowing them to engage and extend the cultural dialog regardless of whether it produces a specific product or not (think public events/installations and such that bring people together, provide inspiration, stimulate conversation, but don't involve the exchange of money- no box office, no merch, just, <gasp> art for art's sake- yikes, eh!

  • daddyo

    Woo hoo! We are all going to be Socialists.
    Now, national or international………………………

  • TerribleTony

    Hmm, so I would suddenly have to become so interested in "new music" that I would spend five squid a month on it? No thanks, I don't want to pay for something I never use. Why would I do that? If I don't need a light on I turn it off.

  • freetard

    "We will all become socialists. "
    —————————————————————————————————————-

    freetards already are socialists. always crying about other people making more money then them…boo hoo! get a better job. be smarter. work harder. or shut up.

    of course, the banking and automotive industries can now wear that title as well so it's not like it doesn't go both ways. all in all 2008 was a pretty despicable year.

    "Much better just to extend "fair use" to everything non-commercial. The original creators still have their rights to use their works commercially."
    ——————————————————————————————————————

    this is not feasible for the movie of video game industry as has already been explained to you.

    very few video games have any commercial viability, let alone the kind of viability that would cover production costs and salaries. counter-strike or halo type tournaments cannot be applied to all games and don't even make enough money to warrant mentioning in the first place. theater showings for movies currently account for 16-20% of the market over the last six years. under your idiot plan, 80% of the film industry's revenue would POOF! and what do you think would happen then? surely not innovation, nor an increase on chances taken, everything would become four-quadrant (that is, catering to all four major viewer demographics) so r-rated movies would be gone. Big blockbusters would be gone because no one would gamble that hard if there's wasn't a DVD market to prop up potentially lackluster BO. i hope you like romantic comedies!

    so once again, we have roze talking out of his ass, utterly ignorant of the business side to everything. i'm as surprised as you are…

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/ICE_30 ICE_30

      Don't count socialism out my friend capitalism is already going down the drain with american bubble bursting.

  • BS!

    Janko Roettgers dont lose your day job, your predictions show a huge deficit in your knowledge of P2P.

  • Jacob

    @ Chronoss. Yes I agree with you about high speed internet with silly caps being usless. But I have seen worse caps for fibre internet than that. The worst cap I saw was 1GB (not 10GB but 1GB) and then it was either reduced to dialup speed or pay multiple dollars per GB overage. And let me tell you that it wasnt a cheap plan either.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/ICE_30 ICE_30

      We have such type of moronic plans in India dude they give 2mbps lines and 1 GB cap and per MB they recharge .

  • pink panther

    Only if there is an option not to pay a flat fee!

    Some of us don’t want to subsidize the current music industry.

    If there’s a flat fee option for people who want it, fine.

  • http://citronengras.de Frank

    I think another important development will be an increase of private sharing via F2F-Apps like DC, RetroShare, Alliance. Hope to see more people using this in 2009.

  • At this point, you can't close down any of the big torrent sites without unplugging the entire Internet. So that's a NO on your "One of the biggest torrent sites will close down" prediction.

    I've got a prediction, though. Pushed to new heights of desparation thanks to the failure of their doomed 3-strikes initiative, the MAFIAA will find itself in unprecedented legal trouble after their War on Sharing violates one too many basic freedom laws.

    The RIAA will be first on the chopping block.

  • matt

    The writer for this article (Janko) is practically an RIAA shill, so it’s not a surprise that they write stupid things like “p4p will work, we’ll all pay a fee, etc”. Hell, they even believe that the RIAA lawsuits are stopping! We all know how much that’s going to happen. The only thing other than that commonly covered is magic praise of P4P, which is free press for the RIAA. We all know how many RIAA members are on board for the p4p concept.

    Jeez.

  • Jan Klaasen

    First prediction:
    dough != though

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dough

    • Robin Hood

      a toll is a toll, and a roll is a roll, and if we don't get no tolls, then we don't eat no rolls

  • Pingback: A great new resource for businesses » Get An Apple Today

  • dave

    in the UK i think we will see a decline in BT use, as more and more ISP's realise that they can shape/cap BT protocol to free up bandwidth for more customers and even offer higher speeds as a result. just look @ Virgin Media who are already doing it (or will be) BT have been doing it for years now and other ISP's are joining the bandwagon

  • Jake

    I hope mininova gets shut down and all their money taken away. I also hope they get a jail sentence!

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/ICE_30 ICE_30

      Why such hatred campaign agains mininova its a good indexing site.

    • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/ICE_30 ICE_30

      Why such hatred campaign against mininova its a good indexing site.

  • chronoss

    NOTE TO YOU ALL
    it was NOT warner that came up with the idea
    it was SCOAN ( music writers in canada supported by a breakawy group of musicians )

    I hten sat for 2 months showing a way that it could be done in canada by removing Micosoft in migration on ALL GOVERNMENT COMPUTERS.

    Warner then jumps in and says ya great idea but what they want is about TWENTY TIMES. WHat socan proposed and would and is this idea effectively going to END the usefulness of ANY HIGHSPEED LEFT in CANADA.

    ALL the 60GB caps, all the traffic shaping, means why bother with highspeed at all.

  • chronoss

    as it has been suggested in my wokrings about this that the fee is added to HIGHSPEED accoutns , what does granma really need wiht a 5 megabit or higher account?
    Especially if shes only looking at webpages and doing email.

    Linux isoz you use technology to allow full speed to sites based on a YOU apply to get your site freed up and as long as you have no "copyrightable" conent ..you get approved.

    YUP the whole hting is a pain in arse
    but i had in detail at faircopyright for canada worked out every detail.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/EZEE EZEE

      The thing is, Sweden has some of the fastest connections in the world.. and cheap.

      People having 5 and 10MB lines are more common than people on the 2mb lines (am on a 100mb line myself… and could be considered a power user with hundreds of gigs(or more) used in bandwidth per month.. but not a single complaint from my ISP and i pay about $50 a month) and gran is on a 10mb line, no matter if all she does is chat/webcam with her grandkiddies/browse sites and email.

      Sweden is also the home to the fastest privately owned connection, 40GBPS – thats GB not MB (http://www.usatoday.com/tech/webguide/internetlif

      And finally, I dont care what "fair copyright" says, paying labels to just sit back and do nothing is just wrong, them being buried sounds much better.

      Cheers!
      http://www.eZee.se

      • easybutton

        Umm thats 40 gigaBITS not BYTES. b = bit and B = byte. For those of you who don't know 8 bits = 1 byte. Meaning your 6 Mbps connection is 750 KBps (kilobytes per second).

  • Pingback: TorrentNews.Ru » ??? ????? ? ???????????? ? 2009 ????. 5 ?????????

  • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/Roze Roze

    Collective licensing would work only if industry were the only creators of music. It takes out the independent (or "indie") music creators.

    The actual obvious solution is to extend "fair use" to include all non-commercial usage and non-commercial derivative works.

  • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/Roze Roze

    Collective licensing would work only if industry were the only creators of music. It takes out the independent (or "indie") music creators.

    The actual obvious solution is to extend "fair use" to include all non-commercial usage and non-commercial derivative works.

  • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/Roze Roze

    Collective licensing would work only if industry were the only creators of music. It takes out the independent (or "indie") music creators.

    The actual obvious solution is to extend "fair use" to include all non-commercial usage and non-commercial derivative works.

    Roze

  • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/Roze Roze

    Collective licensing would work only if industry were the only creators of music. It takes out the independent (or "indie") music creators.

    The actual obvious solution is to extend "fair use" to include all non-commercial usage and non-commercial derivative works.

    Roze

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Crazy1 Ben

    On the prediction of a major site shutting down – I predict Isohunt. Don't ask me why

  • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/Crazy1 Ben

    On the prediction of a major site shutting down – I predict Isohunt. Don't ask me why; I've just got a bad feeling. . .

    • yeah

      im with you there but I also get a weird feeling about mininova. They have been playing nice but there still a valid target, TPB is invincible for now but mininova is bearly slipping by with smooth talking. if mininova goes down.. there will be a problem for a while, all that traffic will blow up everywhere and may cause a domino effect.

      • http://intensedebate.com/people/extramedium Mike Chelen

        There are enough different public torrent sites that even if one is taken down it would not be catastrophic. Although Mininova and others do a great job and hopefully will never stop operation, advances like DHT and magnet links mean that bittorrent would continue happily even if every single public site were taken offline, which is even more unlikely :D

    • .:AKR0N:.

      I too have the feeling that isohunt is the one mentioned, however I dont see any reason why it would tank now. Its currently my favorite, so heres hoping for the best for it as well as all the other sites to which I turn for my torrent needs.

  • dude

    Unfortunately. Over the next 3 years the net will be slowly destroyed.
    It is the last real bastion of free speech and truth.
    With only corporate controlled tv, radio and print, public opinion can be bought.
    Orwell was a prophet of modern times.

  • Jim W

    I swear you liberals piss me off sometimes. Article writer- there is a difference between P2P and socialism and you are misunderstanding what is going on here.

    Socialism is all about attacking private property. Although copyright is technically a type of private property, it’s a property that only exists because government creates it in the first place. Owning things like land or personal possessions or money isn’t a right granted by the government. These rights preexist the concept of government, the government shouldn’t be able to take them away. Because of this, rolling back the scope or duration of copyright is not the same as redistributing natural forms of property.

    I know that as a socialist you have trouble differentiating between the different targets of your redistributive tendencies, but you need to understand that the rest of us feel rather strongly about natural property rights. If you see P2P as the first step in a socialist crusade against private property, you’re in for a rude awakening.

  • subexpression

    VOIP, VPN, apps like Citrix, and online gaming can use up considerable bandwidth, so a cap is improbable (at least where I am located).

    As long as your packets are encrypted, your data is unreadable by your ISP. For all they know, you could be downloading old episodes of Gilligan's Island. They can, however, determine if you are using bit torrent, even if your headers are encrypted.

    The main hurdle to leap over and reinventing tracking.
    If all goes as predicted, and there's a clamp down on P2P, then the next gen will need to address how peers find both the files they're looking for and are able to locate one another.
    DHT is great – but it might not last.

  • John Might

    Sounds like pretty good stuff to me dude!

    privacy.de.tc

  • Reklrul

    “It is the blindingly obvious solution (ie by far the best compromise on offer, and credit to Warner for proposing such a sensible scheme). I would very happily pay a monthly fee for unlimited legal access to all p2p files (provided the bulk of that fee went to the actual artists, not to their contractual overlords).”

    Would I have to pay that fee even though I rarely download music? (I don’t, I’ve never been into music that much). What about the MPAA? Surely they’ll want a pirate movie tax. And the TV networks? The video game companies? The applications companies, like Norton and Adobe… How much of a monthly tax are you prepared to pay? $10? $20? $50?

    My predictions for file sharing in 2009;

    1. File sharing will get more expensive for many people as ISPs like AT&T start imposing ridiculously small usage caps and overage charges on their accounts.

    2. The RIAA & MPAA will continue trying to re-write copyright laws to suit their own interests and stupid politicians will continue to help them (as long as they get paid).

    3. The eDonkey network will continue to shrink as more and more servers get taken down.

  • Anonymous

    My prediction for 2009:

    P8P will work. For all you slowpoke.jpgs:

    Yes, peightpee, paid pee. Contrary to shit in bottles that is.

  • http://www.we7.com We7Steve

    The progress that has been made in 2008 is that music companies and new digital start-ups (like We7) are offering consumers legal alternatives with regard to free music, making free music easier and safer to stream and share and also monetising it so that artists and rights holders can get paid while consumers get free music – everybody's happy.

    2009 is likely to see further development in these types of services and increased value for music lovers.

    Steve Purdham
    CEO – We7
    http://www.we7.com

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/extramedium Mike Chelen

      There is already alot of exciting overlap between free music and P2P, that will continue to grow. Musicians can get listeners with a minimum of distribution costs, and we will some techniques like BitLet music streaming will be improved and become more popular.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/ICE_30 ICE_30

    I hope we get more good trackers out not only TPB and demonoid we need more.

  • Pingback: Blogs You Probably Aren’t Reading But Should: TorrentFreak | blogcampaigning

  • Pingback: Torrents, file-sharing and p2p revealed

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/extramedium Mike Chelen

    There is no single perfect solution, the best possibility is that there are many options so that listeners can pick what is most convenient for them. Customers will be interested only if the overall value is good.

  • http://www.shazzle.com Jay

    Im thinking there will be some crossover with the new software called Shazzle.

    • Jay

      Sorry forgot the URL.. Check it out http://www.shazzle.comit does small group file sharing vs. the large bucket approach of most of the other file sharing programs

  • Hossam

    What about usenet?

  • BTGuard - BitTorrent Anonymously

NewsBits

Even more news...

  • The Pirate Bay Isn’t Down Completely, Just Having a Few Issues

    Twitter and Facebook, not to mention the TorrentFreak inbox, are currently alive with complaints that The...

  • Pirate Bay Founder Gottfrid Svartholm on Freedom of Speech

    Freedom of speech is a highly valued commodity, but should people be allowed to say whatever...

  • Blu-ray Anti-Piracy Tech Stops Discs and Promotes Purchases

    An anti-piracy system present in all official Blu-ray players since 2012 has received a fresh update...

  • Foxtel Breeds Pirates by Locking Up Game of Thrones

    One of the main reasons why people turn to piracy is the lack of legal alternatives....

  • UK Student Admits Breaching Sony Copyrights With Leak of PS3 SDK

    Last year an Internet user known as El Nomeo leaked version 3.70 of Sony’s Playstation3 SDK...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

PopularArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.