TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

Former Uploaded.to Admin Fined $188,000 For Copyright Infringement

The former operator of a popular file-hosting site has been heavily fined by a court in Germany. The man, who is the former admin of Uploaded.to, was found guilty of offenses related to the unauthorized distribution of copyrighted content. The court fined him a total of 144,000 euros ($188,000) but due to other key matters in the case the important issue of service provider liability for third party actions wasn’t tested.

If the recent and ongoing controversy involving Megaupload has taught us anything it is that hosting other people’s content has the potential to spark heavy handed legal action. But while the 2012 Mega case rolls on with no end in sight, another case has just drawn to a conclusion.

Uploaded.to was born sometime in 2006 as the one-click file-hosting market began to develop. For the time it offered a generous upload maximum of 250mb per file and by the end of 2007 was selling premium accounts and offering uploaders four euros for each uploaded file downloaded 1,000 times.

The site now exists under new ownership at Uploaded.net but the historical activities and fate of the site’s former operator following a criminal trial are now being reported.

Uploaded.to

In addition to controlling Uploaded.to, the man also operated a second linking site called DC Remix. When the original rightsholder complaint was filed in 2007, Uploaded had around 400,000 hits a day and DC Remix around 80,000 members.

Due to shared ownership and the fact that DC Remix published links to copyright works stored on Uploaded.to, this was not a simple case of the operator of a file-hosting site being held liable for the infringing actions of his users.

Rasch Legal reports that the sites were in “technical cooperation” in order to provide a system for the illegal distribution of music. DC Remix encouraged its users to upload pirated music to Uploaded.to, profited from those who subsequently bought premium accounts on the file-hoster, and generating money throughout from advertising.

During the trial the District Court in Munich found that the rewards program operated by Uploaded.to incentivized users to upload infringing material, by paying out more to those who generated the most subsequent downloads.

The court found the man, known by the name Deniz C, guilty of commercial copyright infringement and sentenced him to pay 360 day fines of 400 euros each, to a total of 144,000 euros ($188,000).

The site operator accepted his sentence in principle but is reported to have appealed the 400 euro amount, arguing he had a net income of just 7,300 euros. However, the original amount was considered reasonable following the discovery of photographs on Facebook depicting the now Swiss resident in a luxury apartment overlooking a lake, wearing an expensive watch, and alongside his Lamborghini.

Related Posts

Previous Post | Next Post

  • mark

    No pity from here. Making money with pirated content is just WRONG! I hope all those hosters that rewards uploaders would die.

    • Guest321

      I concur. He deserves no sympathy. Sad to see that the current admin of uploaded is a greedy scumbag as well. His day will come, not to worry.

      • G-Prix

        With all the money some of you spend
        in VPNs, seedboxes and donations per month,
        you could run a server where people
        could upload things to download for free
        and you obviously could firstly download from there.

        Think about it.

    • OR PICK A NAME

      Well, there is still a small problem… Torrents are fine and dandy, but their lifespan is not as long as the files on filehosters. Too many times I’ve found a dead, or incomplete torrent of something rare, while there was a ready to download copy on a filehoster. For me these two world co-exsist.

      • Who

        and I can say the same fucking think about file hosts. MANY times I found dead links to EVERY file host do to the fact that ether the up loader deleted it or the host did do to infringement and then found the dam thing on a torrent. so the life span has nothing to do with it. the problem with file hosts is that if the file gets removed you have to waist bandwidth *most people have caps now* to re upload the file. with torrents you don’t have to be the sole up loader.

      • Pick my nose

        All we need then is a filehoster willing to host and seed torrents ;)

      • Guest321

        Nobody has any problems with file hosters as you are assuming. People only have problems with file hosters that exist solely to make money off piracy. Why else do you think a hoster would be paying money to uploaders for premium sales or downloads while giving attrocious speeds to free users to the point of no use?

      • eexd

        yeah is gr8 isnt it :-), often dead file, locker has it helping the whole world out by archiving it.

    • ScrewEwe2

      I’ve never used one. BitTorrent all the way.

  • guest

    Corrupt fuckbags.

  • FionaT

    No sympathy here either, this sort of thing is what has given sharing a bad name

  • Pingback: Former Uploaded.to Admin Fined $188,000 For Copyright Infringement | Best Seedbox

  • Gnurkel

    Yes these are sort of the dark horses in the copyright race – but… the point is they are still just found liable for ACCESSORY to copyright infringement, while the government is doing nothing to go after everyone who actually infringed!

    I eagerly await the day they start putting ALL copyright infringers in jail equally, rather this pussyfooting around with three strikes/six strikes/ warnings/ taking the ISP/ taking the websites etc etc

    • Guest

      Who is going to pay for the upkeep of housing people in jail when everyone is in jail!!! In the eyes of the copyright holders lending a CD/DVD to a friend is copyright infringement and a punishable offence.

      • Gnurkel

        Exactly – this is why I eagerly await that day!

        Seems like you misunderstood me. This is the “Caligula”-approach. Only when the absurdity hits you smack in the face with significant consequences – like half your neighborhood in jail – are you forced to accept that the current Copyright regime can’t go on!

        By having a law that criminalizes everyone, but only enforcing it at whim you get an intolerable legal situation. The industry gets to cherry-pick their battles, avoiding resourceful and connected victims, but weak and poor ones (like Jammie Thomas) gets friggin’ nailed to the cross!

        The only solution is to reveal Copyright in all its glorious vileness. Only then will society accept that we hit the “reset” button and form a new law based on how we can stimulate creation of intellectual wealth without infringing upon basic human rights.

        Sorry for not being sufficiently direct…

        • ScrewEwe2

          I think the second post made it all sufficiently succinct.

        • Gnurkel

          succinct – a fantastic word I haven’t heard in ages! That made my day!

    • Who

      “liable for ACCESSORY to copyright infringement”

      ok then that just means the internet needs to be shut down and every corporation that owns a search engine should be locked up.

    • Guest321

      Yeah with more people in jail than out, I’m sure the government can rely on your tax money to provide us with free lunch. May be 100% of your income should be taxed. Clearly you are not putting your money where your mouth is.

  • Rick

    poor innocent people charghed hundreds of thousands

    corrupt polliticians and law makers steal millions and they get away with it

    • anon

      I felt the same way until I read about his Lambo and luxury home. The guy might actually have a real chance of paying that money without living his life in debt. Still, there is no doubt that the local music alliance made a tidy profit out of this. I’d be happy to take 150 grand any day.

  • someone

    I just hope people will abandon Dotcom’s projects, too. That fat man was and actually still is living a luxury life purely thanks to the fact his sites are being used for pirated content. I think it’s a very weak and cheap way to make dough by distributing content that *you* haven’t contributed into at all. And i’m not taking about these few freelance artists that participated in Mega.

    I support free file sharing. I support when people have the chance to educate themselves with expensive software that would be otherwise inaccessible in third world countries. But only when educating and using it for personal usage, and not financial gain. That’d be just pathetic.

    • ghamarkhanum

      They have already done that, haven’t you seen that Mega’s alexa rank has fallen lower than what it was before it was even launched? TF doesn’t seem to be willing to write anything about this, though, judging by the amount of hope they gave the pirate community that the new Mega with all its publicity will be our savior, it isn’t much of a surprise either.

      • Guest

        MEGA launched 1 month ago: 3M+ users, 125M+ files and is increasing on a daily basis.

    • harry krishna

      i support free sharing, also, but capitalism happens

      • ThumbsUpThumbsDown

        Not only does capitalism “happen”; but, the hopes of p2p file-sharers,
        (to see vastly and efficiently distributed Intellectual Property within a
        universal Public Domain), will NOT happen without a healthy “for
        profit” alternative to the legislatively protected Monopoly system that
        now exists.

        The relevant difference is between an unhealthy
        social management of Intellectual Property by a few Monopoly suppliers
        whose perpetual control resides in their infinite ability to corrupt the
        political system; and, a more healthy and more equitable market for
        Intellectual Property based on a plurality of smaller suppliers who are
        NOT legally privileged; who do NOT have the free cash flow to corrupt
        politics; who can NOT write Law; who can NOT put prosecutorial and
        Police Authority on redial; and, who are too preoccupied competing for
        survival to abuse Customers and Citizens.

        We know what a good system looks like.

        The reason we can’t have a better system is because a truly bad system has us in its grip.

    • antifud

      really? he’s profiting on piracy?

      might want to take a look at artists who have actually gone to him to profit on their musical abilities.

    • one more

      mega,that site telling you tou use google spy chrome or enabling DOM storage.this is is not for me.

      • Christopher Kidwell

        one more, stuff it. Chrome does not ‘spy on you’ anymore than any other browser does.

        • Advertising = spying

          Your correct all browsers are intrusive in their own way, BUT google does the the MOST spying among all others. You do realise google started off as a advertising company right? And I think it still is a advertising company.

        • yup

          Google started as search engine, nothing else, they had no idea how to monetize for years before they introduced ads.
          They are sneaky little bastards no doubt though.

        • Guest321

          Some people suffer from excessive paranoia. These are the same people who have nightmares about Google driving an axe through their skull while they are asleep.

  • WAKE UP

    see CNET did it illuminati CBS

    The Lone Gunmen Pilot – 9/11 Predictive Programminghttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z3WW6eoLcLI

    Illuminati Symbolism http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DqBRvoMpmiI

    http://torrentfreak.com/tag/cnet/

    CBS / CNET – the Crime

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1onY5-NvGf0

  • WAKE UP
  • Guest

    Odd. Exactly why are they going after small fry compared to sites like Filesonic, which the RIAA’s data claims to be the number one filesharing threat? Or are they in fact scared of having a fight put up against them and are going after what they believe to be easy fights, as opposed to righteously upholding the golden rules of copyright law?

    • Guest321

      Been living under a rock? Filesonic has been dead for over a year.

      • http://www.facebook.com/forkingham.melle Forkingham Melle

        i live in a cardboard box outside mcdonalds(free wifi). does that count? although i did know sonic was dead, i might try a rock tonight, see if the signals as good

      • eee

        they took the money and run, right after that report they limited sharing to no one then finally enabled it for about 1-3 days then self destructed (went offline)

  • WAKE UP
  • http://www.facebook.com/forkingham.melle Forkingham Melle

    this is not in the name of a free internet and file sharing. to make that much money is sick. these people always tend to come from Andorra or Switzerland or some other shielded island within Europe. i wonder, will uploaded.to and the likes go the same way?

    • eww

      well uploaded.to copied uploading.com at the time and started that way, it is highly presumed due to the similarities so possibly a pirate used the service and liked it and copied it but used it for further pirating making him more liable, then got cought up some how and this is outcome

  • Violated0

    During the trial the District Court in Munich found that the rewards program operated by Uploaded.to incentivized users to upload infringing material, by paying out more to those who generated the most subsequent downloads.

    That sounds like a faulty conclusion. The rewards programme is neutral and simply rewards popular media. I am sure the latest version of Unbuntu would be very popular as well but infringing it is not.

    So it is regretful to hear a Judge buy-in to this usual copyright bullshit. It is just the usual infringement happens here so shut the whole thing down including a vast supply of lawful independent content.

    • nonamthanks

      Knowing that pirated material is the most popular, instituting a rewards program without verifiying the content that is used in the program is a very bad idea. Rewarding people for breaking the law is a bad idea.

      • Gene Poole

        The fact that you feel no activity should be tolerated without some parental Big Brother oversight speaks volumes, and just goes to show your content industry agenda. The internet cannot function without supervision! Someone might violate a terms of service!

      • Violated0

        Rights holders have always been expected to police their own media when they know it best.

        With thousands of uploads daily no site owner can be expected to verify the copyright status of each and every file of many different types. Then who is to say a file under copyright was not uploaded by the rights holder for official distribution.

        That is why the DMCA and EUCD were wrote the way they were with rights holders spotting the problems and having the site owners remove them.

        You also ignore the fact that site owners are allowed to profit from infringement when being a DMCA/EUCD protected business does indeed mean profit from lawful infringement,

        So I again ask how can a rewards programme not be neutral when the law has clearly established how media is to he handled and who does the checks?

  • Anon

    i love uploaded.to all of you are stupid i love the current admin. he pays me really good every month

  • Who

    to all you dumb asses that have said he got what he deserved. MU now known as MEGA, did the same fucking thing and is STILL doing the same fucking thing. CHARGING to use a service to store files. BUT most of you praised fat boy for it. BUT NO, if some one else does it and gets nailed for hosting copyrighted files you say they got what they deserve.

  • Typhoid Mary

    It is people and sites like we see here that give file-sharing a bad reputation. No sympathy here either.

  • Angry VIP uploader on TPB.

    Lol , this guy is a real pirate , hey TF… are you gonna defend him?
    Then , let me tell you this, as a PP members , go to hell..

    This guy , along with other cashwhores are the reason filesharing is suffering so much

    This IS NO FILESHARING IS FILESELLING

    I read a comment below about ubuntu shared via megaupload.
    R U 4 Real?
    Why the fuck should I download ubuntu from a filelocker with 4kbs per second when I can download any software from sourceforge at 10MB/s?

    All filelockers that offer ppd or pps should just burn in hell.

    They don’t care about sharing , they care about money , money , money , money they are worst than the scum at shittywood if you can imagine that.

    They are worst shit than the MAFFIA , this only proves than some things have no limit.

    188k fine? If it were for me he should just rot in prison.

    Filesharing is Caring. You share something you have with one that doens’t and doesn’t affor to buy it.

    You don’t make him pay for something you also didn’t pay for.

    CASHWHORES SHOULD BURN IN HELL.

    PS.

    Sorry for the mistypes , I’m just 2 f* angry.

    • Alpha3

      +1 Download their warez stolen from other places make them rich

      motherfuckers, visiting their shitty sites make them rich

      For this guys sharing is make money not “carrying”

      • LOOOOL

        “Caring”…You illiterate.

      • ScrewEwe2

        Cash and carry?

    • Darkside

      +1 Visting their shitty sites make them rich downloading their stuff downloaded from WE KNOW WHERE MAKE THEM RICH MOTHERFUCKER TF Why you delete my 1st post?

      These guys from uploaded just stole **** and p2p releases and make money from them? Don’t i speak the truth? Check it? For every file download uploader gets credit. And no,,,, after some time files are deleted i see many old torrents with many seeders on the TPB still live and well seeding!!!

      • LOOOOL

        That’s why he drove a lambo and overlooked a lake in the Swiss alps and you….sit in a basement with a box of kleenex fapping to youporn.

    • FuckFilesmonster

      Yeah lol… and I bet all that money goes to the artists xD yeah the
      GEMA in Gurmany will handle all the infringing data and recompensate
      artists that got their “shit” stolen LONG ago by signing away any rights
      to it. HAHA! Now wake up and smell the MPAA jizz in your mug.
      There are moneywhores everywhere… welcome to capitalism. Also Uploaded.to didn’t boycott Jdownloader or Cryptload or any of those leeching clients. Can’t imagine why anybody would buy premium… haha.

      Now FILESMONSTER… that is a fucking pile of money grubbin shit right there. I wish FILESMONSTER would burn in hell. Try downloading some large split up archive… good luck with that shit. Even if you keep your IP straight and accept large waiting time between each part SOMETHING gets screwed up in the process and the file turns out shit.

      Guess what. Crack me some premiums and get that shit for free like the freetard on the corner. AND GUESS AGAIN fancy PANTS!

      THERE IS A CAP on PREMIUM MEMBERSHIP DOWNLOADS! YEAH! BUY ANOTHER PREMIUM ACCOUNT FAGGOT! <- That is practically what they say to your face on their shitty page!

      bet Filesmonster is truly mafia operated scum.
      FUCK FILESMONSTER

  • PelouzeTF

    Should have been sentenced to jail time :/

    • Guest

      You obviously failed in sucking the judges cock long and hard enough didn’t you in bribing him to get that outcome.

      • PelouzeTF

        Such a poor retort. You sir, are truly a joke.

    • afndimrdandi

      So people not making money can go to jail to. You know these kinds of thing generally work both, right?!

      • PelouzeTF

        “You know these kinds of thing generally work both, right?!”

        English please.

  • Foff

    Most of you who post here are living in fantasy land. Cyberlockers are providing a service no different then offshore banking yet no one is attempting to fine or shut down these banks even though they are assisting criminals. I believe the courts are dead wrong to assess any liability to these services unless society is willing to go after thirds parties consistently .

    The sharing or piracy infrastructure could not exist without some money. There are no doubt pirate sites that don’t make a lot of money but no one goes to the effort to create and fund a site without the thought of generating some revenue. I will admit that the original tpb admin do not appear to have profited much off of the site. There is no evidence that any of them made any significant amount of money if any. This is why this site still exists. So while there are notable exceptions in general the admins of most sites are making at least a living.

    I do agree cyber lockers are profiting a little too excessively off of file sharing. All of them charge about $13 a month for a premium account. Which brings up the question: Why isn’t there one with the attitude of tpb that charges half to third of what the current going rate is?

    Finally with respect the mega I still have not seen any links in any of the sites that I visit so at this point the new site is light years away from the glory of the original site.

    • BesseHebbe

      ” I will admit that the original tpb admin do not appear to have profited much off of the site. There is no evidence that any of them made any significant amount of money if any”

      sorry the way the site was designed and the way they waited forever to add the magnet integration and instead served torrent files so long and a tracker when they were not needed (over 5 seeds and hopefully every client allows dht so u can build torrent file from hash or magnet), and generated huge bandwidth bills (operation would be smoother if just on magnets had saving bandwidth and no tracker as dht fixes that part, so they were making money throwing it away, and finally upgraded super long time l8tr. They bought all that hardware etc servers etc when it was not needed, instead of going efficient., which money had to come from some where so they made lots of money just blew it. They also are 1%(maybe little above) of population of internet reaches daily guessing reading it or using it.(not total traffic but like that many ppl go to site everyday), which = huge $ in advertising however at discounted rates but still huge.

      • Dohhhh

        Some people just don’t get it. TPB is alexa top 100. From ads alone they’re easily racking in $15,000 a day. That should pay for their servers and bandwidth and the few people that operate it.

    • yup

      Offshore banks do not aid criminals, they aid tax dodgers.

    • Dohhhh

      Because HARDDRIVES are fucking expensive. You checked the prices for 1 Petabyte? Each rack can only hold certain amount of HDD. Each HDD has to have Raid configuration which takes away half the space…

      On top of that comes bandwidth. Your ability to negotiate a good deal comes down to the prospective of how much business you will be doing with the hosting company, so no….Who the fuck is going to charge 3.99/4.99 for a month’s membership when that asshole is just going to leech 100TB? Multiply that asshole with a few thousand and you are NOT going to make money.

      Cyberlockers cannot exist without a Premium membership. That’s why Robert King started killing their funding.

  • jjj

    “However, the original amount was considered reasonable following the discovery of photographs on Facebook depicting the now Swiss resident in a luxury apartment overlooking a lake, wearing an expensive watch, and alongside his Lamborghini.”

    spybook http://www.stfimages.com/image/UeL , gotta luv it

    (sarcasm)

  • Anon

    Even if no money changes hands, the vast majority of copyrighted entertainment content tends to be American in origin, and is protected by other countries by their trade agreements with the USA. Further, the 9th circuit found way back in 2001 there is an inherent commercial function of making and rendering copies to others, “to save the expense.” When the intent of the provider/seller is “to pay or do without”, making a copy you want for yourself is a clear way of getting the product while avoiding the price, and thus just as selfish as any site admin who tries to offset costs by charging fees on you. You are all pirates, avoiding cost and leeching value from the creators, the rights holders or each other, while claiming its “free speech”. Scumbags all.

    “To save the expense” Illegal file bartering has been held to be a commercial use, cutting off the defense of fair use in the U.S.: “…[C]ommercial use is demonstrated by a showing that repeated and exploitative unauthorized copies of copyrighted works were made to save the expense of purchasing authorized copies.” A&M Records, Inc. et al v. Napster, Inc., 239 F.3d 1004 (9th Cir. 2001), at 1014.”

  • West

    For all of you people saying that he deserves that, I am sure that you are copyright trolls in disguise

    If you really care about us, then tell us where we can easily find all of the material found in file hosts. So far, I haven’t been able to find the source repositories for that material.

    So if you are not trolls wanting to make people support you in this, let all of us know where to find all of the source files, which aren’t found easily not even in The Pirate Bay or IsoHunt (of course, tell us unless you are copyright trolls).

    • No more cashwhores

      So , what stops the cashwhores for uploading the same file from filehosts on TPB?
      AAAA….they dont get paid . they don’t earn money

      GO TO HELL CASHWHORE!!!!

  • frozar

    If I drag 18.8 million pennies up to their office, will the building collapse? I can’t be responsible for collateral damage.

  • chaitanya

    upload.to is the worst site for free downloaders. the download is slow and unreliable.Not a file sharer but a greedy whore.

  • Typhoid Mary
  • Pingback: In the News.. | TorGuard.net Blog - Anonymous VPN Services

  • Pingback: Former Uploaded.to Admin Fined $188,000 For Copyright Infringement | Intellihub.com

  • chunjie821

    tinyurl.com/cnaff79.

  • http://www.facebook.com/00l001 Giuseppe Mala Via Capasso

    piracy showed thousands of computers and many other things
    your windows as it is your software? all pirate

  • http://www.facebook.com/00l001 Giuseppe Mala Via Capasso

    go fuck yourself F.B.A. and tribunale in Germania

  • BTGuard - BitTorrent Anonymously

NewsBits

Even more news...

  • Pirate Bay Founder Gottfrid Svartholm on Freedom of Speech

    Freedom of speech is a highly valued commodity, but should people be allowed to say whatever...

  • Blu-ray Anti-Piracy Tech Stops Discs and Promotes Purchases

    An anti-piracy system present in all official Blu-ray players since 2012 has received a fresh update...

  • Foxtel Breeds Pirates by Locking Up Game of Thrones

    One of the main reasons why people turn to piracy is the lack of legal alternatives....

  • UK Student Admits Breaching Sony Copyrights With Leak of PS3 SDK

    Last year an Internet user known as El Nomeo leaked version 3.70 of Sony’s Playstation3 SDK...

  • Pirates Can Be Identified Despite Sharing IP Addresses, ISP Claims

    Carrier-Grade Network Address Translation is a network mechanism through which many Internet subscribers can share the...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

PopularArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.