TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

Hurt Locker Makers Sue Lawyer Who Helped ‘BitTorrent’ Defendants

Graham Syfert, the lawyer who offered self-help to alleged BitTorrent downloaders of films such as Far Cry and The Hurt Locker, has been sued by the makers of the latter movie. On behalf of Voltage Pictures, the US Copyright Group (USCG) is seeking sanctions against Syfert and demand $5000 for the ‘work’ the self-help forms have caused them. in reponse, Syfert has requested sanctions against the plaintiffs because their filing is “completely insane.”

hurt-lockerIn August, we reported on the self-help documents lawyer Graham Syfert was selling which enabled individuals sued by USCG to defend themselves. The documents were sold for $9.99 (now $19.95) which is a bargain compared to hiring paid legal advisors.

“One of the major problems that people encounter when trying to hire me on these cases, is that a settlement is approximately what an attorney would need to even begin a defense,” Syfert told TorrentFreak at the time.

The forms for pro se (self help) representation Syfert prepared include a Motion to Quash, Motion to Dismiss, Affidavit in Support and a Motion for Protective Support. All forms are fillable and are accompanied by detailed instructions of how they should be used.

“My dream would be to have 10,000-20,000 people file all three documents to the lawyers and severely cripple the entire process and show them that you shouldn’t be allowed to join so many defendants,” Syfert informed TorrentFreak.

Quite a few people have used the forms in recent months and in total 19 were submitted to the court. However, the defendants weren’t the only ones who took notice of the offer. The law firm behind the USCG lawsuits, Dunlap, Grubb and Weaver, was one of the first clients who bought a copy of the documents.

And it didn’t stop there, as Syfert informed us that the law firm was not happy with the service he offered to the defendants.

“After I put the forms up for sale, Jeff Weaver from Dunlap Grubb and Weaver gave me a call and threatened me with sanctions. This was back in September. He also purchased the form for $9.99 when it was on sale for a discount,” Syfert told TorrentFreak.

“He threatened me, and everyone who is using my forms.” According to Syfert, the anti-piracy lawyer (Weaver) threatened to double the settlement requests for those who were using his forms.

“Then he e-mails me a while later, advising me on the status of what he called my ‘clients’. They are not my clients, they are people who purchased forms. I do not provide assistance in filling any of these forms out,” Syfert explained.

Syfert then flipped out and sent a ‘tongue in cheek’ email to Weaver asking them to offer him a $200,000 per year job, or contact someone who actually gives a fuck. “Hire me or eat shit,” he ended his email. Not the gentlest way to make a point, but the calls and emails did stop.

That is, until two days ago.

This Monday, Weaver emailed Syfert a motion he had just submitted to the court (on behalf of the makers of The Hurt Locker), requesting sanctions against him under federal law. “He says that the 19 cases of forms that have been currently filed cost them $5000 and he’s seeking those sanctions against me personally,” Syfert explained to TorrentFreak.

“So I requested sanctions against them because this is completely insane,” Syfert added. “If 19 cases costs them $5000 in attorney time, I wonder how many cases it’d take before their business model crumbles. That is unless they are going to actually work for a living.”

The two documents (embedded below) filed by both parties are currently awaiting a response from the court. Although the turn of events is certainly an entertaining one, it seems to be mostly a clash of lawyer’s egos, not something that will contribute anything substantial to the thousands of sued individuals.

USCG (and thus Voltage Pictures) feels that Syfert is obstructing their money-making scheme, and ironically accuses Syfert of running his own money-making scheme with his self-help documents.

The one positive note from all of this is that USCG are upset for a reason. Although all the motions to quash and motions for protective order, whether filed by an attorney or filed by a pro se defendant, have been denied repeatedly by the judges, the motions to dismiss have not.

Defendants who filed a motion to dismiss for a lack of personal jurisdiction have been successful. This is not something USCG and their clients wanted to see because it means they potentially have to refile thousands of cases in other states. Needless to say, this is going to be an expensive endeavor, and thus a huge blow to their pay-up-or-else scheme.

Motion filed by USCG representing Voltage Pictures

And the reply…

Syfert’s reply

Related Posts

Previous Post | Next Post

  • [C*]

    Yo dawg I’m gonna sue you so you can sue while you’re sued.

  • Mr.Afghanistan

    hahahaah. now real GAME is starting !!! =)

  • mouse

    Let the pitbulls fight each other.

  • Mr.Afghanistan

    To be honest, I quit like this Game.
    [MPAA-RIAA]B!tchez vs [Law]B!tchez ^_^

    Lets see who wins the Game.

  • blaa

    Haha, “Hire me or eat shit”, that’s a good one

  • Sue Me And Lose

    Graham Syfert … Great win , well done.

    You beat USCG , now they are clutching at straws , to get ahead.

    Law is an interesting fight to watch , especially when , One small man can defeat a very Big Bully.

    Graham , your work is appreciated.

    You have given the “”little man”" a tool to beat the bully.
    Ledgend !

  • ME

    Shows ya how desprite these idiots are to have some control.

    The internet was designed to be free and open, so let it be !!!

  • ME

    Shows ya how desperate these idiots are to have some control.
    Glad 2 see someone related to Law standing up for what is right.

    The internet was designed to be free and open, so let it be !!!

  • Pingback: Tweets that mention Hurt Locker Makers Sue Lawyer Who Helped ‘BitTorrent’ Defendants | TorrentFreak -- Topsy.com

  • Reggit

    Lol – yet another sign of what goes through all these peoples heads – How DARE people defend themselves against US!!
    …But theres always a bigger fish =P

    Makes me wonder how can we expect common human decency in a situation where there are large sums of money to be had for the victor?

  • Anoon

    Can someone explain on what grounds each is claiming sanctions are warranted? Why is it sanctionable to help people defend themselves? Why can you not fight USCG’s money making scheme….aren’t you entitled to fight against it?

  • anon

    Let’s just weigh what this means.

    The greedy, scumsucking piracy law firms are PISSED. They are SCARED and PISSED that people are replying to their evil threats with legal documents. They’re so pissed that they even sued the lawyer who made the documents, for NO APPARENT REASON.

    This guy is a hero. Everyone needs to buy his stuff.

  • Tinka

    Not that I want to hurt Graham, but I really think we should make a torrent of his forms.

  • DJDANKVT

    Graham Syfert, you are my hero! I could hear how you told Dunlap Grubb and WEASEL to eat shit over and over again and it would never get old, ever!

  • acce

    there is something wrong with the media industry…

  • bleh

    Arent lawyers just great? Referring to people like chum and shark bait..

  • Able Jones

    LOL, in come the bottom feeding, blood sucking attorneys, everyone loses.

  • IMTDb

    The law has just been redefined :

    “When you loose a trial, you file a complain against the lawyer that just beat you”

    Do people at USGC really think about what they are doing or is it just “sue everyone and lets hope we make money out of that”.

    The problem is that “thinking about what you are doing” requires neuronal connections. So let’s just sue everyone.

    @11 : It has already been done :p

    — Admin of: http://imtdb.kicks-ass.org

  • aus

    Is there nothing similar to being Threatened or Slyck in the States? Or is the process there so radically different that these would be of little use?

    It’s fairly obvious USCG are getting a bit jittery, so now would be a good time to pile on the pressure…

  • Rob Cashman (Cashman Law Firm, PLLC)

    #10, the plaintiff attorneys have filed for sanctions against Syfert because they claim that he wasted the court’s time by making legal forms available that defendants can send into the court as “self-help” to get the accusations against them dismissed (e.g., for lack of jurisdiction). The problem is that there are procedural rules when filing a motion (e.g., to also serve the plaintiff’s attorney, etc.) and DGW is claiming that among other things, the users of the forms did not adhere to procedure and thus are invalid. In addition, they care claiming that Syfert’s forms wasted the courts time because now they need to deal with all 19 defendants who improperly submitted the forms. There are other issues, but this is the jist of it.

  • anonymous

    how the hell can one law firm be condemned (for defending people) by another law firm? seems to me that USCG expect to be able to accuse people, take them to court and win, without anyone putting up any sort of defense. everyone is entitled to contest an accusation, whether true or not, and defend themselves, with or without help. what a bunch of self-centered, self interested, hypocritical assholes! trying to pass themselves off as representatives of the law is a f***ing joke! this is even more of an insult to the law than the extortion they are practicing!

  • Clarence

    I was kind of sympathetic to Graham until I learned that he actually begged for a job, and offered to turn the tables. There was nothing “tongue in cheek” about his request/offer.

    He’s just like the USCG… only motivated by money.

  • harry krishna

    thus spake alice: curiouser and curiouser

  • Anonymous

    *Nelson* Ha Ha!
    nuff said.

  • Thys

    Good action. He should make more of these. Let people know how to fight and they will.

  • Blackplan

    Can’t find easy targets for pay or else schemes? Pick from a random list of those involved!

  • random pirate

    IMTDB, internet torrent movie database? nice one :) didn’t know it.

  • Anonymous

    Hey hurt locker makers….fuck you!

  • Ano

    Keep shooting yourself in the foot, sooner or later you’re gonna run out of feet and won’t be able to walk anymore, well beside walking the plank that is.

  • USA GO AWAY

    Only in America…

  • Le Fake

    Suing the man for helping defendants stand up against a legal blackmailing scheme? If such lawsuit moves any further than the nearest bin, I’ve totally lost trust in the American democracy.

  • Anonymous

    oh what if the DVD was eakeed Muphochs desk? He was in posiession of it first before it hit screen and torrent. IS.nt he the real pirate to go after/?

  • Ale Gore

    oh what if the DVD was leakeed off Murdoch’s FAWXdesk? He was in posiession of it first before it hit screen and torrent. IS.nt he the real pirate to go after/?

  • Afficionado

    Would have had a lot more respect for Syfert if he’d put his forms up FOC. Still I suppose that’s the American way.

  • hmm

    haa USCG the work he as caused haa self help is not illegal screw you
    USCG morons

  • Anonymous

    GO Graham !

  • hahahhahahaha

    oh this is good
    finally someone with a brain

  • Pingback: Hurt Locker Makers Sue Lawyer Who Helped ‘BitTorrent’ Defendants | Systema

  • MeepMeep

    Sounds like a good script for a movie.

  • Anonymous

    Graham Syfert must be hurting these parasites very hard with his form for them to react this way.

    Good job Graham! And Thank you!

  • 133t

    oh well suing each other is America’s national pastime or it is the national sport :P

  • if only more people stood up

    God bless you Syfert.

  • hmmm

    lol.

    They guys are so stupid, they didn’t even notice lawyers didn’t need a lawyer and to pay the related fees to defend themselves.

  • Armo

    reminds me of one of my favorite movies, Interstate 60

  • What Huh

    @Graham Syfert “A lawyer who represents himself has a fool for a client”

  • Torrent the Docs

    So are these “self help” documents available as a torrent yet?

  • Anonymous

    #19: At least he does good things for the money.

  • titus

    “Syfert informed TorrentFrea.k” yeah sure alwyas editors here are saying that them are informed but them are just make searches on faceboo.k and other similar sites and copy+paste some of officials informs so NO THEY ARE NOT SAYING TO TORRENT.FR.EAK NOTHING!

  • Nelson Muntz

    @21 You can’t be me, there’s only one Nelson Muntz!

    Ha Ha! (Finger Pointed at “imposter” comment #21)

  • hotdog

    lmao “and I say to myself what a wonderful world”!!
    Hurt Locker sucked anyways all hype and very bad results i thought avatar was way better and should have won all the awards.

    oh and the screener for the film takers has done the same 33 minute screener just like Harry potter.
    lol @ Sony pictures lmao!!

    I feel like this has all become one big playground where all the grown ups forgot about the good old days in “Pretendland” where everything was fun and nothing mattered.

  • lolz

    well this is fun isnt it. i dunlap scumbag and douche are really complaining people defending themselves on the cheap is a waste of the courts time eh? im sure it is in their eyes, its quite obvious scumbag douchebag and farts only see the court as $$$$$, so in their eyes anything not getting them that $$$ is a huge waste of time. i mean honestly, what did we pay all those lobbyists for if we cant just steal money via the courts without any resistance?

  • ?

    The documents were created because many people were getting the same case against them which meant one set of documents could be used by all. It took time to make the documents and Syfert probably only wanted to recoup a small amount of the money he could have made with just selling them to one client.

    Weaver is lucky only a few filed those documents. It could have been a larger number.

  • Anonymous

    lol! This is just crazy!

  • Jay Emerson

    “Hire me or eat shit.”

    That phrase in THIS economy should be used more often by everyone in my opinion.

  • Nomad of Norad

    To number 46: Well, now that this has been publicized in places like here, you can bet those numbers will go up! Muahahahaha!

  • The Terminator
  • StevO

    If everyone was so worried about what the courts costs were for ANYTHING, you wouldnt see Movie Stars making a circus act out of them when they get in trouble. They arent concerned with what it costs the TAX payers when they want to put Lindsey Lohan in a rehab for 30days or drag Michael Jacksons crap out for years.
    The US court system is the biggest joke in the world. Its shocking they can go after pirates with so much enthusiasm considering the REAL problems we face.

  • JD

    Someone REALLY needs to investigate these corrupt lawyers doing all this suing. Its nothing but pure corruption, on their part. This is sickening, and I can’t believe Judges are letting them get away with this.

  • JD

    Surely there has to be some firm or agency that has power over these corrupt lawyers, and their mafia tactics.

  • Anonymous

    @16 slyck has some good information on it but it is notorious for censorship of the site and banning and flaming, I do not support slyck until they wise up and get rid of the flamers which is around the top two people who post
    @19 he was just saying that just to see what they would say.

  • Anonymous

    Is there somewhere I can torrent these self-help forms :)

  • Jay

    I’m seriously thinking about buying one of these forms just to support this lawyer. That he took the time to help people that were/ are being harassed by the system is just a great thing.

  • James

    I can’t believe how broken is the justice system of USA. It make no sense.

  • fuck Cashman

    here’s what’s at stake here:

    if Syfert’s form loses, it would mean that potentially, ANYONE who gives self-help advice (I mean anything, regardless of the effectiveness of the advice, which is, btw, something the people should always be wary of anyway), can be sued by anyone (typically by a big company that has the resources to mount a legal battle), because the advice a.) exists, b.) is ineffective, c.) is effective. it potentially means that self-help devices will no longer be available because a precedent is set that impugns its legality.

    to Cashman #17. waste of time?? if this was a waste of time, then the courts would have had a remedy for it already, i.e., “you can’t file shit that looks and works like this because it is an improper or illegal form nor can you file this shit YOURSELF or engage in the process as your own attorney”. obviously, the advice Syfert is giving has some value to it and it is finding it’s way to the courts and the courts are looking at it.

    only time will tell if these forms will be found to be legit or not. but at this moment, filing this is not a waste of time. everyone who has been in tech and have seen IP/copyright battles over the years knows that the record companies and the MPAA are pissed off that their shit is getting ripped off so every now and then, they sue someone to prove a fucking point. Syfert’s form calls attention to the futility of this.

    imagine, if 100,000 users in the space of 6 months, plunk down $20 to buy Syfert’s form and file their own claims to dismiss this shit in open court.

    tell you what Syfert: have a Thanksgiving sale and give people a chance to buy your forms for WHATEVER THEY CAN AFFORD ABOVE $1 and see what happens to the court system then.

    the record companies are dead and the MPAA is on it’s way out. instead of looking for help from tech, they try to squash it. fuck them all.

  • Anonymous

    #57, justice? That only happens in movies.

  • Anonymous

    Wait, wait, wait.

    Are they trying to sue him because he… told people about what they could do to defend themselves? Now people aren’t even allowed to be aware of the law? Heh.

  • whipped

    I’m so glad I never wasted any time viewing or downloading this movie.
    Shame!

  • PL Plucker

    Hey Mouse!

    20 on Syfert.

    If I lose i’ll sue you.

    :)

  • What’s This?

    After reading I still don’t know what’s all this law jargon article about?

    How is filling forms a waste of courts’ time.

    Are these forms needed be authorized by a lawyer and expensive? Was it been sold cheaply?

    I interpret this as once the document is filed USGC threat will no longer be effective? Why?

    May someone translate further into simpler laymans term please

  • meh

    The what whater? never heard of it, guess by the sound of the legal battles around it the movie was a turd anyway.

  • Just some guy

    “Lawyers are like nuclear weapons. They have their’s so I have mine. But when you use them they fuck up everything” – Other People’s Money.

  • Anonymous

    Let the lawyers fight it out. USCG doesn’t have unlimited funds. A few more of these costly battles without any income, they will go out of business.

  • Johnny

    I just love Syfert’s e-mail response, cool and witty:

    “When I am not defending cases, I squeeze cash out of poor people for a living just like you.”

    LOL

  • Xhibit

    Yo dawg I herd u leik suing people, so we gave you sanctions, so now you can sue one person, while you sue thousands of people.

  • InterWebz

    HOW DARE YOU TELL THE IGNORANT HOW TO EXPLOIT THE LEGAL SYSTEM! ONLY US SLIMEBALL LAWYERS ARE ALLOWED TO DO THAT!

  • rob8urcakes

    @#56 by JD who said,
    “Someone REALLY needs to investigate these corrupt lawyers doing all this suing. Its nothing but pure corruption, on their part. This is sickening, and I can’t believe Judges are letting them get away with this.”

    The following graphic puts it all into context my friend. It’s titled “RIAA v The Pirate Bay” and can be snatched here
    http://www.cracked.com/funny-4003-the-pirate-bay/

    For example, one ‘fact’ in particular that stands out for me is -
    “According to the RIAA, the Pirate Bay has stolen about 46 times more dollars than actually exist on Earth.”

    See now why the lawyers and Courts lap all this up?

  • Whatever

    The Hurt Locker producers themselves seem to be sued for stealing some imaginary property (Forgot where i found it but probably through a link somewhere. Anyway, it can be found again with google).

    They are quite busy defending and attacking on 3 fronts.

    BTW: Why wasn’t this irony mentioned on TF (or i missed it).

  • mee

    DDOS dunlap+weaver?

  • AUS

    LOL, I’m gonna start selling “Hire me or eat shit” t-shirts.

  • Mrs. Mangle

    Remind me to kick the crap out of James Camerons exwife if I ever have the displeasure to meet her. All this crap is due to her suckass movie which wasn’t any good anyway.

    Dear Kathryn Bigelow. You SUCK. Any kid with a helmet and a box of firecrackers could have outdone you. Take those 6 oscars and shove them up your arse, or better yet your greedy lawyers, as you as hell don’t deserve them.

    Your movie is crap, your lawyers are dogshit in suits and I hope you die!

  • elduka

    this is the only time i truely laughed out loud on this site. truely hilarious at those idoits haha

  • Anonymous

    sueing a guy that knows how to defend himself in court, this should be interesting. i give the advantage to uscg for having deeper pockets.

    i wonder if uscg i mad because of loss of revenue or are they also mad at him for daring to offer the people in defending themselves in court and daring to be right

  • Ninja

    LOL! He’s providing affordable means for ppl to defend themselves and he’s sued for making other lawyers work harder? LMAO

    Seriously, this article is epic. Hope they eat sh!t as he said. rofl

    TF you should follow this one closely. If anything, it’s gonna be one hell entertaining show. And we might get the chance to laugh from MAFIAA clowns even louder than before ;)

  • Pingback: Online Global Week in Review 26 Nov 10 from IP Think Tank

  • Anonymous

    Apparently, the Hurt Locker’s meant to be a good film. I’m sure as fuck not buying it now. Shame.

  • ImNotALegion

    That is like a shopkeeper that sues the shopkeeper next to him for selling stuff to his clients and so taking money away from the his purse. Or even worse its the shopkeeper sueing a normal person who grows his own carrots…

    • Halpert

      After reading your post, these words come to mind:

      Used. We. Todd. Ed.

  • meh

    Part of what makes it great is they say he’s selling the forms in aim of making profit for his work on putting them together and evaluating what would be relevant to a case like this.

    Soooo… it’s okay for a studio to demand compensation for time and work rendered, if a defense lawyer providing self help packets does it isn’t okay and in fact it’s demonized by the plaintiff.

    Totally makes sense now, mass media companies are the only ones that should ever expect payment. Everyone else should work for free under their almighty hammer.

    Glad the USCG hasn’t realized they’re trying to establish that people shouldn’t be compensated for products or services they provide, if they win it would be epic to see that twisted against media groups.

  • Tom

    As several people have pointed out, surely he should have given the forms out for free? I mean, I know he took time producing them, and studied for three years at university to be able to do so, but free is good, right? I mean, free is the only virtuous thing to do?

    Lucky for us it’s one of those happy congruences where the outcome that is easiest for us all is the one that is also morally correct. Thank God for that, otherwise I’d feel guilty about never having to pay for anything.

  • Anonymous

    To the US Copyright Group (USCG): “The Game” You just lost it!

  • meh

    @Tom

    It wouldn’t matter if he gave them away for free. It’s still forcing them to do work they didn’t want to do and that’s what this ammendment is about. So they would have sued him anyway and probably for a higher damage claim because their dispute is based on the claim that he’s representing these 19 people when he’s not.

    Free would have probably screwed him over even more. Virtuous isn’t always smart and at them claiming roughly $263 per filing for 19 people it would have put his new practice belly up. There’s nothing to admire about someone doing the right thing in providing any level of help getting legally raped so people can escape the hot seat this time and go “thanks bro good luck lulz”.

  • Anonymous

    I wonder if they’ll sue the lawyer’s lawyer.

  • Fugasmic

    You couldn’t make this shit up.

  • John Milton

    All this is a very fine object lesson showing what this is all about, i.e. attorneys {sic} gaming the system. It isn’t really about protecting intellectual property, though it is about money. Though to a far lesser degree, the clients of USCG especially are also being manipulated and taken advantage of in these cases. Only the plaintiff’s attorneys win. I hope the broader public continues to become more aware of what is going on with these suits and with things like COICA and ACTA. That is happening, and public disgust with the greed and shady methods (in and out of court, including DDOS attacks) of these supposedly wronged parties and their representation, is growing. My other hope is some super-rich guy (like maybe George Soros) steps up and throws 10 or 20 million into the kitty to defend these people (3-5% of whom never, ever, not once, not one bit, infringed anything, nor even thought it might be something to do someday; tracker data, even client peer lists, contain errors, too many for them to be reliable legal evidence of anything).

  • derp

    YOU WOULDN’T DOWNLOAD A CAR

    Yes.. Yes I would.

  • Pingback: ruff linkage 201048 | PieceoPlastic TAZ – The Revolution Will Be Blogged

  • No Money

    #10 – USCG is not suing Graham on any reasonable legal grounds. Their suit is purely an intimidation/scare tactic.

    Graham is calling their legal bluff.

    In legal theory, suits are supposed to take place in courts which have appropriate legal standing. This usually includes {among other things} suing someone in their local region where their local court has jurisdiction {including powers to issue subpoenas and the like}. There are a bunch of rules which govern venue.

    The other issue is that suits are against single or legally related entities/people. This is why you can see a single suit against a company, it’s subsidiaries and it’s officers. But not a single suit against say, a gas station in one city and people in 5 different cities whose only connection is they all plug into their local electric grid.

    USCG is attempting to use the federal courts to achieve economies of scale by joining together {as targets} people in disparate jurisdictions whose only connection is anonymous at best without proving such a connection exists.

    There are serious legal issues which actively subvert the rule of law and what little fairness the legal system has regarding the tactics USCG has chosen to use.

    As for Graham, there is an entire legal ‘forms’ business specifically geared towards self help for people who simply cannot afford a lawyer. The courts have long accepted such self help. From a legal standpoint, USCG knows this to be true.

    USCG’s tactic can therefore only be seen as an attempt to intimidate Graham. This is egregious in the extreme and is sanction-able up to and including disbarment. Not like to happen. But USCG is really taking a risk here {however remote it is}.

    You simply don’t file frivolous lawsuits against fellow lawyers. Doing so tells the court something about you as an officer of the court that judges are not thrilled to see. Given that this judge has already indicated she won’t entertain suits against anyone not in her jurisdiction, I’d say it’s pretty clear that she’ll not be pleased to see this tactic by USCG.

  • hrrumph

    i like how the lawyer who provided the defense forms for money told the competing law firm to hire him or get bent. way to sell your services to anyone, guy. but he can do what he wants i suppose.

  • meh

    @hrrumph

    He tells them to hire him or get bent after the fact that they’ve been hounding him over the phone and email. I take it you’ve never worked in an office before? It’s a bit annoying when you’re trying to work and people keep bugging you for random shit while you try and get your tasks done.

    Glad you were able to take that literally instead of as the figurative statement it was. To pay him to listen to their banter or get lost because he knew they were full of hot air.

  • Pingback: links for 2010-11-28 « Wild Webmink

  • Pingback: The Technology newsbucket: Ireland’s bailout, Oracle’s win, Nokia marketing and more « billytompson

  • Anonymous

    I hear they are planning on suing the judges next for “bad” judgement against them… ;)

  • kritik1

    The judge should look into whether a case should go forward in a preliminary hearing. In most cases the judge should ask the organization the legality of suing a lawyer who acts on defendants behalf. If the bar association cannot find grounds for unethical behaviour of the lawyer, then the judge hands are tied and no docket should be entertained for a case against the lawyer.

  • Burt

    Unbelievable. I am rooting for this attorney. Dunlap Grubb and scumbag are just a sick group of extortionists. You have to read this article on the truth behind the hurtlocker lawsuits!

    http://reportyourcomplaint.com/us-copyright-group-lawsuit-scam-please-read-this-before-you-pay-dunlap-grubb-weaver-anything/

  • Pingback: Anti-Piracy Lawyers Sued For Fraud, Abuse and Extortion | Tech-Bubble

  • Pingback: Anti-Piracy Lawyers Sued For Fraud, Abuse and Extortion | We R Pirates

  • Pingback: P2PTalk » Anti-Piracy Lawyers Sued For Fraud, Abuse and Extortion

  • Cik

    “hire me or eat shit.” even if he was serious, guy’s a fucking hero.

  • Pingback: Anti-Piracy Lawyers Sued For Fraud, Abuse and Extortion – The Torrent Engine

  • Anonymous

    Note to self:

    Never rent the Hurt Locker.

  • cde

    Seriously, no torrent or RS of the papers? If it was a buck, it be a nice read…

  • Fetus

    It will be hilarious if this lawyer makes more money from his self help than the makers of Hurt Locker make from DVD sales…That would be an EPIC win!

  • tourbar

    PLease check this articel. USCG was sued in class action. Hurt locker filesharer should do the same!

    http://torrentfreak.com/anti-piracy-lawyers-sued-for-fraud-abuse-and-extortion-101129/

  • Pingback: The new Internet business model « Gaijinass

  • BTGuard - BitTorrent Anonymously

NewsBits

Even more news...

  • Pirate Bay Founder Gottfrid Svartholm on Freedom of Speech

    Freedom of speech is a highly valued commodity, but should people be allowed to say whatever...

  • Blu-ray Anti-Piracy Tech Stops Discs and Promotes Purchases

    An anti-piracy system present in all official Blu-ray players since 2012 has received a fresh update...

  • Foxtel Breeds Pirates by Locking Up Game of Thrones

    One of the main reasons why people turn to piracy is the lack of legal alternatives....

  • UK Student Admits Breaching Sony Copyrights With Leak of PS3 SDK

    Last year an Internet user known as El Nomeo leaked version 3.70 of Sony’s Playstation3 SDK...

  • Pirates Can Be Identified Despite Sharing IP Addresses, ISP Claims

    Carrier-Grade Network Address Translation is a network mechanism through which many Internet subscribers can share the...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

PopularArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.