TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

New Data Exposes BitTorrent Throttling ISPs

New data published by the Google-backed Measurement Lab gives a unique insight into the BitTorrent throttling practices of ISPs all over the world. In the U.S. and Australia most large ISPs limit less than 10 percent of BitTorrent transfers. In the UK and Canada on the other hand, some providers interfere with up to three-quarters of all BitTorrent traffic.

throttlingHundreds of ISPs all over the world limit and restrict BitTorrent traffic on their networks. Unfortunately, most companies are not very open about their network management solutions.

Thanks to data collected by Measurement Lab (M-Lab) the public can learn if and how frequently their Internet provider limits torrent traffic. Among other tools, M-Lab runs the Glasnost application developed by the Max Planck Institute.

Previously the researchers published data up until 2010, and now the results have been updated to include the first quarter of 2012. This allows us to give an overview of trends and changes that have emerged in recent years.

United States

BitTorrent throttling in the US is not as prevalent as it used to be. The main reason for this is the Comcast BitTorrent blocking controversy which started in 2007. The FCC eventually ruled that Comcast had to stop its targeted interference of customers’ BitTorrent traffic.

As a result of this ruling, the throttling percentage took a dive from nearly 50 percent to only 3 percent in 2010. In the first quarter of 2012, Comcast’s throttling level was still at 3 percent, which puts the provider among the best behaving ISPs.

Throttling was also greatly reduced at Charter over the last year, from 11 percent down to 4 percent. Cox is exposed as the most heavy throttler among the major ISPs, but with 6 percent this is still rather acceptable.

Worst: Cox (6%)

Best: Comcast, Verizon, AT&T and others (3%)

UK

In the UK BitTorrent throttling in on the rise, at least among some providers. BT is the worst offender by limiting 65 percent of all BitTorrent transfers during the first months of 2012. This is up from 57 percent last year and almost twice as much as the 35 percent in 2010.

At O2 and BSkyB BitTorrent users are better off with throttling percentages of 2 and 4 percent respectively. For O2 this is a significant decline compared to their 13 percent last year.

Virgin Media sits somewhere in the middle after it interfered with 22 percent of all BitTorrent transfers in the first quarter of 2012. This is down from 33 percent during the same period last year.

Worst: BT (65%)

Best: O2 (2%)

Canada

Canada is not the most friendly country for BitTorrent users. Nearly all of the major Internet providers are heavy throttlers and Rogers tops them all. For more than half a decade Rogers has continuously throttled more than three-quarters of all BitTorrent traffic.

During the first quarter of 2012 the provider interfered with 80 percent of all BitTorrent transfers, showing that there has been no improvement. Bell is a good second with 77 percent, up from 56 percent last year.

BitTorrent users in Canada are best off at Cogeco and Telus with 3 and 0 percent respectively.

Worst: Rogers (80%)

Best: Telus (0%)

Australia

BitTorrent is extremely popular in Australia, but according to the Measurement Lab data ISPs are throttling less than last year.

iiNet is the worst offender interfering with 11 percent of BitTorrent downloads during the first months of 2012, down from 32 percent last year. Dodo hasn’t been caught throttling at all in 2012, a healthy improvement compared to the 14 percent score last year.

The rest of the Aussie ISPs are also throttling considerably less than in 2011.

Worst: iiNet (11%)

Best: Dodo (0%)

The Rest

A quick look at some other countries shows that in Sweden none of the large ISPs have been throttling BitTorrent traffic heavily so far in 2012. The same is true for other European countries such as France, Italy, Spain, Poland and the Netherlands.

In Germany, Kabel Deutschland limited more than one-third (37%) of all BitTorrent transfers, a major improvement on the 69 percent from a year ago.

For Brazilian BitTorrent users Net Servicos appears to be the worst option with a throttling percentage of 13, and in Japan Infoweb Fujitsu and J:COM should be avoided with 60 and 83 percent respectively.

If we haven’t mentioned your Internet Provider here, a full overview of all the data is available here. If you want to know whether your BitTorrent traffic is being limited you can test your connection with the Glasnost tool.

For those BitTorrent users who have a choice, the overview may help to make the right decision when signing up with an Internet provider.

Related Posts

Previous Post | Next Post

  • Obvious

    It’s a bit strange how UPC Poland had a score of 75-90% in 2009 Q1 – 2010 Q2, then no data until 2012 with a score below 5%?? What would cause such a drastic change? Anyone have any ideas?

    • Guest

       Wait, what???

      I switched to iinet because they bitch-slapped the MPAA.

      What happened guys? You used to be kewl.

  • http://www.comichippo.com/ ComicHippo

     One advantage of being in a third world country – No strict rules on piracy !!!

    • nvata.sys

      So BitTorrent = Piracy?

      • http://www.comichippo.com/ ComicHippo

         It wouldn’t be wrong to say yes . Go to any torrent sites all you will find is pirated content . Only a few companies/websites use bittorrent for sharing copyrighted content such as Ubuntu etc and most recently Internet Archive .

        • http://profile.yahoo.com/JZX5KMK4QUZYFUSZ3A4S33REJA Good

          tsk tsk tsk, publicly you’re supposed to say you only use bittorrent for freeware and public materials. for shame, for shame. hang your head and kick at pebbles!

        • anon

           you are wrong, you can go to any torrent site out there and find legit free open source software music and videos. Yes sure there are some copyrighted works but there is thousnads of legit torrents aswell therefore your comment is bull.

          And about being in a 3rd world just wait the USA is knocking on your door soon. If they can control the 3rd worlds they can try and scare the rest.

        • XFyrios

          Flash now uses BitTorrent and flash is everywhere. Just sayin ;)

        • gubatron

          we have thousands of legal works for share at frostclick.com

          Over 1,000 indie albums are released daily, a high percentage of which are willing to let you download for free and who don’t yet know about Creative Commons.

          We work with many of these guys evangelizing Creative Commons and bittorrent.

          It’s a matter of perception and education, there’s shitload of legal content my friend.

      • pavalavaloo

        Don’t be silly, he’s from Somalia.

  • http://torrentfreak.com/ Rob8urcakes

    What I’d like to know is the TRUE basis for limiting BitTorrent speeds.  What exactly does the ISP gain by doing this, and how much money do they save or gain from doing it?

    My ISP in the UK is TalkTalk (not mentioned in the article above), but my MAXIMUM upload speed is only 85 kB/sec. and has been stuck at that for some years now  :(  It’s fucking criminal, yet apparently no worse than any of the rest of these thieving, cheating charlatans.

    So much for “freedom of choice” and competition improves everyone’s interests huh?

    • JabbaTheCat

      “my MAXIMUM upload speed is only 85 kB/sec”

      What is your Talktalk tested download speed?

    • Nick

      Well I will explain you quickly ::

      BitTorrents speeds is taking bandwidth out of ISPs. Since the ISPs doesn’t care about their network, they don’t do upgrade for about 5 to 10 years (According to Bell canada, they just upgraded my city with optical fibe internet). Basicly, their networks (bell) could have been in better shape…

      -If BT takes bandwidth, this means less clients that could that “30 gb monthly”. And it’s better for them to have 10 clients with 15 gb monthly than one client that uses over 150 gb or unmetered bandwidth.

      • Mwhahaha

        Do you KNOW how much it costs to upgrade the hardlines for a city? Let alone for small towns and villages miles from everywhere You want that done every 2 years for every small improvement they make in the cabling?

        I assume either you don’t pay your phonebill or you’re just a dumb cretin.

        Some people are still on dial up and you want fibre-optics everywhere before they even get BB?

        • for Mwhahahah

          why do you have to insult someone.. nobody said upgrade infrastructure every 2 years, hell fiber has been around for 20-30 years for commercial ISP’s. If all lines were on fiber we wouldn’t need an upgrade for another 10-15 years. Ur the dumb cretin for insulting people and assuming things.

        • Nom

           Just FYI there has been 0 increase in the average internet speed in the US for the last 10 years. IE ISP’s have spent absolutely nothing on improving their networks.

        • Nick

          u mad bro?

          U better stfu if you have nothing to say disrespectful fag 

    • Mwhahaha

      I’d imagine it gains bandwidth to share around.
      On talktalk they throttle torrent traffic to a standstill in peak hours, so everyone else can have some of that lovely bandwidth, for emails, facebook, games and pornography… I’m quite happy with having no torrent usage for 6 hours a day. Better that than my bill going up and off-peak the speed’s more than adequate.Caring is sharing, after all.

      • FakeElections

         TalkTalk probably buy their bandwidth off BT. So by blocking your Bittorrent connections.. They save on bandwidth costs… They are simply ripping you off. Not helping everyone get online…

    • Mwhahaha

      And honestly Rob, you know, I know, everyone in the UK knows that talktalk are a bunch of make-do’ers who offer cheap deals for a half decent service. Their connections drop frequently at times, their customer service is terrible, their website is purposefully confusing and their sales ppl lie when you sign up.

      But they’re cheap. Presumably that’s the reason you signed with them, cos god knows, they have fuck all else going for them.
      I’ve used BT & tt and never had an upload speed higher than about 80 myself.You mention freedom of choice, you chose talktalk and you choose everyday not to buy out your contract and go to a better ISP. If you want a decent ISP with decent rates then you know you’ll have to go elsewhere.Normally your posts are great and insightful, today you sound like a toddler throwing your toys out the pram for no good reason.

      • http://torrentfreak.com/ Rob8urcakes

         > Normally your posts are great and insightful, today you sound like a toddler throwing your toys out the pram for no good reason.

        lol, fair enough but it just goes to show I too don’t “know it all” and frequently am in need of decent, accurate, up-to-date info my friend.  After all, that’s ONE of the main reasons for reading TorrentFreak regularly.

        But you’re also quite right, that I tend to comment on issues I know about.  To retain my apparent ‘reputation’, perhaps I should avoid asking questions in future?  Even if they’re genuine and required.  Anyway, I apologise if my post has disappointed you Mwhahaha, and I’ll strive to live up to your expectations in future, OK?

        • Rogue

          Comedy gold.

    • Chris Lunas

      >but my MAXIMUM upload speed is only 85 kB/sec. and has been stuck at that for some years now

      That’s what it’s supposed to be n00b, TalkTalk isn’t deliberately throttling your torrenting upload speed to 85kB/s that’s just the maximum upload speed your account is supposed to be getting overall.

      That’s because 85kB/s is roughly the max upload speed supported by ANNEXL, the ITU (International Telecommunication Union) standard that controls the distribution of down/up stream, if you contact TalkTalk and ask them to enable ANNEXM on your account (and assuming your modem/router supports it) your upload speed will jump to about 3.5mB/s, though this will cause whatever your maximum download speed is to drop by the same amount, as the TOTAL line speed on an ADSL2+ line (top speed 24mB/s decreasing depending on line quality) cannot be increased without switching to fiber, or at the very least asking to be switched to a higher sync rate and moved to a gaming profile with error checking disabled (which will most likely fuck up your line stability).

      My parents have a TalkTalk line and they get consistent speeds of D:19mB/s U:85kB/s, and that is fine for them because they (like the vast majority of users) don’t need to upload anything more than the occasion pic, so it makes sense to cap upload speed to ANNEXL and prioritize download speed instead.

      • Meagbyte

        Silly skiddy, there’s no such thing as millibytes.

        • Chris Lunas

           I’d only just woken up when I wrote that, leave me alone!

        • Meagbyte

           @google-26f93c199f1225ec2daad304003a0bd1:disqus I am Meagbyte, therefore Meagbyte exists. It wasn’t a typo, honest!

    • GrumpyGit78

       @Rob8urcakes:disqus max upload speed for adsl2+ is 1Mbps iirc….you ain’t that far from it…..your line probably isn’t stable at a higher upload speed

      you probably wont get much higher unless you subscribe to a FTTC product ifwhen available

      me > 11.5′ish Mbps and 0.66′ish Mbps (80′ish KB/s)

    • Noorm

      “MAXIMUM upload speed is only 85 kB/sec”

      Without knowing your sync rate that means nothing.

    • Jon7272

      mines 40kps upload lol australia sux for uploads bring on nbn 

    • TheGrandZodiac

       Go to Be* :)

  • Jugjugjugiuhiuhu

    my torrents on BT go at 2-3 mb/s for like 5 minutes and then they get killed to 60-80kb/s if I’m lucky 100-200.

  • Guest

    I am from Brazil and I have “NET Servicos” ISP service (10 Mbps Down / 0.8 Mbps Up) and I have no problems downloading via Torrent. Most torrents I reach my maximum download speed (1.1 MB/s). For those people who have this issue, try changing the default port number to random up to 30000. 

  • http://twitter.com/FunnyAndFlirt piyush wadhwa

    The speed always comes down after sometime, whatever the place or ISP it is.

  • Pingback: New Data Exposes BitTorrent Throttling ISPs

  • Mwhahaha

    Honestly if ISPs can throttle torrents this effectively, then we should just be glad that they’re not all legally forced to throttle all torrent traffic always.

    • Colin Carr

       We may have to kill you for suggesting that on a public forum where the enemy can read it.   ;-)

  • Pingback: New Data Exposes BitTorrent Throttling ISPs - Webmaster Forum: Webhosting, SEO, Internet Marketing

  • Pingback: Torrent News » New Data Exposes BitTorrent Throttling ISPs

  • A Torrent Tracker Owner

    [quote]Worst: BT (65%)

    Best: O2 (2%)[/quote]

    this make s me laugh because they both use the BT network as does sky, talk talk, beunlimited and all the others(of which there are about 600 providers in the uk that use the BT network) but yet all the rest throttle less than BT.

    for all those on BT, sky, talk talk, O2, beunlimited etc phone them up and ask for a “SFI check” on your line because the speeds are really bad. dont be fobbed of with them saying “we have run a test and its all ok” the only test your provider can do is a exchange to home continuity test.

    also do not forget the speed you get on a copper phoneline all
    depends on how far away you are from the exchange. so take that into consideration when thinking what distance you are away from the exchange. work on the rule that for every mile you are away from the exchange you lose 1mb of your alleged upto speed. this is not exact but can give you a good idea of what you should get.

    also speeds depend on the quality of the cable you have on your line. if you are still on the old grey 2 core cable it needs changing, if your line runs through trees  to your house and you have crackle on the line it needs changing or if you just have crackle on the line. all these things can cause your broadband problems.

    also another little fact is broadband only needs 1 core of the line to be working but a telephone needs 2. ie: if for some reason if 1 core is broke for some reason  you can still use your broadband and the phone wont work so you need a engineer out to check the line ;)

    note: it can take upto a week for a engineer depending on when your provider can get a free slot in the Openreach system to book a engineer for you, normally its a 3 day wait but if they are busy it can take longer.

    hope all that helps :D

  • Rampage1985

    i am on bskyb in the uk (london area) and as far as i am aware i have never been throttled, speed aint the best though @ around bout 1.5MB/s to 1.6MB/s

  • Pingback: Estudo mostra que NET e Embratel são provedores que mais praticam traffic shaping no Brasil | Tecnoblog

  • Anon99

    Surprised that Virgin Media are not on that list.  They throttle torrents to silly slow speeds from midday to midnight every day of the week.  

    That is on top of their other traffic management which slows your connection to 50 to 75% of its original speed for 5 hours if you download a 1.5 to 2.5gb in the evening.

    • A Torrent Tracker Owner

       that all depends on what package you are on bud. if you are on the top teir there is no throttling at all.
      lower packages are throttles in 2 sections 9am to 4pm and 4pm to midnight.

      im on the 60mb package at the moment which is the middle tier but i also use airvpn and have no throttling at anytime and get great speeds through airvpn for the next 3 months for 15 euro. is well worth it :D

  • John Spartan

    w00t, my ISP, Rogers, rated the highest…..
    oh wait, high scores are bad…. FUCK YOU ROGER

  • Anonymous

    considering the data that has proven that using torrents does not interfere with the speed of other users of any particular ISP, the only reason that can be relevant is that it gives the ISPs the excuse to slow connections down simply to be bloody-minded. it’s done because it can be done and, as per usual, no consideration is given to customers who are paying for what is still classed as an ‘up to’ service. as for speed, the UK is lagging well behind other countries. the reason for that is BT still having the monopoly in 99% of places and decades old copper and/or aluminium cable not being replaced. think about the UK governments broadband strategy where it wants the whole of the UK on at least 2mps and 90% on ‘super fast’ by 2015, as well as providing the best superfast broadband network in Europe

    by the same year. what an absolute fucking joke and an insult! on top of that, what the hell is the point of having any broadband speed when almost every government wants to stop people using the Internet for anything except opening e-mails and booking holidays, unless a fortune is paid to the overly greedy entertainment industries? as long as customers are lied to and penalised and companies can continue lying, get away with it and make extortionate profits, no one gives a toss!

  • http://techfleece.com/ Richard Gailey

    I have been with BE Broadband for a few years now and it really is the best ISP in the UK as far as speed and service go.
    I used to be with BT (well actually only about 3 weeks) before switching to BE ( part of O2). The reason I switched was that when I first signed up with BT, which I did on-line, I was promised unlimited usage which was only available via their Option 3 program. Just three weeks into this I hit 100GB and was throttled to the point that even a YouTube video running at 360p had a job buffering let alone playing. Luckily I had recorded the on-screen chat that I had with the lady that sold me BT’s Option 3 package (CTRL+A on the chat screen as saved as PDF via CutePDF). I then checked their ToS just to make sure that any argument that I was just about to get in with them was valid, to see if they made any mention of their Option 3 data cap. At that time (a few years back) they didn’t. I then managed to get hold of Ian Livingstone’s email address (BT CEO) and sent him an email explaining what had happened, the recorded conversation of the chat with the sales girl and a copy of their ToS.Two hours later I received a reply back from him saying that he would pass the information over to his assistant; a further 1 hour later I was released from my 18 month contract.If I had of gone through the help desk, I would never have gotten out of it.1 week later I was signed up and using BE Broadband and have never looked back. It’s a bit more expensive but you get what you pay for.

    • Guest

      I’ve been on BE for 5+ years with only a handful (if that) of very minor problems. They’ve been great. I was on BT before as well & it was actually Blueyonder when I signed up. When I was on a week long holiday, they took it upon themselves to cancel our subscription due to over use, with no warning, along with all of our email accounts. I would never go back to BT.

  • Guest

    I think there may be a bad implication here as DPI does not necessarily equal torrent blocking or limiting. It just literally deeply inspects the packets and their contents and then makes pre-chosen actions on the results.  Some types of DPI sell themselves as breaking P2P connections but my ISP ranks from 5% to 10% DPI and it only offers unlimited Internet and there is no problem with getting full speed BitTorrent downloads.  My ISP also offers IPTV and VOIP solutions over DSL and I have a strong suspicion that most of their DPI is for managing that.

    I mean for crying out loud they keep going out against the big name telco ISPs infront of government regulators talking about how they don’t have this bandwidth crunch the others do and they are government owned and run.  They push for Net Neutrality and speak out against rate hikes and for the rights of independent ISPs (to a point because there are some that are competitors)

  • BT user :(

    I have BT infinity and can get upload speeds anywhere up to 4 – 5MB/s  never get throttled. No other ISP in my area can offer anywhere near the speeds BT offer.(no virgon media in my area) Do BT still actively block on the fiber network or is it just the ADSL.? Anyone know?

  • ThumbsUpThumbsDown

    Imagine, for a second, that the Internet could be made to operate like one huge Corporate Desktop; a smoothly functioning Digital Shopping Mall in which ALL Internet Traffic could be efficiently monetized at current Copyright Protected Premiums……

    On that Internet, Profit would be reliable; and, reliably HUGE. 

    On that Internet, Customer’s expectations, conduct, rights, choices, and recourse in resapect to grievances, could be managed and resolved profitably within a known framework of commercial and civil obligations under which the “Rights” of Businesses would have primacy. 

    On that Internet, your choice would be to go from one Corporate Desktop to another; and, you would be there to shop. 

    Now If THAT Internet were today fully realized, Do you think we’ld be facing Issues of inadequate Capital Investment in the Technical Infrastructure?  Would we be having problems with ISP throughput throttling? 

    I submit to you that the ptoblem of ISP throttling, like the Corporate war against Torrent Traffic in general, resides in two diametricly opposed and incompatible world views in which Democratic Citizens have EVERYTHING at stake:  On the one hand, Citizens have told Corporations (witness the angry popular rejections of PIPA, SOPA, ACTA, CISPA, and TPP), that the Digital Internet is NOT merely a Corporate Desktop; a global Shopping Mall on which Business Interests shall have primacy; but is rather, more akin to the Modern Democratic Public Square on which the Rights and priorities of Individual Citizens are centered.  To the extent that Corporations have understood that this evolving unregulated Internet wipes out their dreams of easy Monopoly Profits, they have withheld Infrastructure Investment.  Hence, ISP throttling.   

  • €$£

    No thanks to BitTorrent Inc. who have sat on this throttling information for years after stating publicly that they had it.

  • http://twitter.com/RogersNicolas Nicolas @ Rogers

    Hi,

    I’m Nicolas from Rogers Social Media team.

    We’ve been managing some P2P
    file sharing traffic on the upstream to ensure the best possible experience for all
    our customers. This said, new technologies and important investment enabled us to start phasing out our Internet Traffic
    Management Policy (ITMP) on March 1st, 2012.
    Customers can get an update regarding the removal of this policy in their area here: http://promo.orderrogers.ca/trafficmanagement/en/?cm_mmc=Redirects-_-Consumer_Traffic_ENG-_-Traffic_2012-_-traffic  

  • Aponymous

    Question, does enforcing encryption on your bittorrent transfers defeat all attempts at throttling?

    • Techanon

      No, it only defeats DPI. It doesn’t defeat datacaps.

      • Aponymous

        My bad, I meant ‘all attempts at throttling bittorrent transfers’, obviously it wouldn’t get around other restrictions.

        But from your answer I’m guessing, yes, it defeats their attempts at throttling bittorrent.

    • Guest

       VPN is the solution.

  • Smair Sk

    In canada they stopped 
    throttling  for rogers as CRTC told them to either stop it or a get  huge fine of 2 million dollar

  • Trelew

    The problem in Canada has been that the Big 2, Bell and Rogers, have pretty well much had their way with the government.  The CRTC is pretty much their play toy as the government given them whatever they wanted.  These two companies hold a lock on anything telecommunication (phones, cells, internet) as well as owing various TV networks.  Canada has the highest cable costs anywhere in any of the G8 (and probably G20) nations.  Again out governments care more about corporate welfare than that of the people whose welfare they are SUPPOSE to represent.

    • Jon7272

      no difference here in australia charge what they want telstra and optus theres others but there not worth being in ie iinet 

    • meowmix

      looks like living next door to america, american greed has rubbed off on them.

  • http://nejtillpirater.wordpress.com/ Nejtillpirater

    Throttling is the future, this may reduce piracy effectively. 

    • Darwinism

      So we’ll adapt the protocol until you either can’t identify it, or incorrectly identify it as something else.

      • http://nejtillpirater.wordpress.com/ Nejtillpirater

        Sure. There will always be a struggle between good and evil, honest people and criminals.

        • Chillinfart

          Here in peru, piracy is not the problem. The problem is the GREED from the two ISP that we have (Telefonica/Claro), despite some benefits that they collected from corruption and that our internet services are the WORST in South America, only after Bolivia.

          Go home and be a family man bro, not all are pirates.

        • Darwinism

          Those things are defined relative to subjective position.  They mean nothing objectively.  What matters is survival.  There is no good or evil, merely powers in competition striving to attain position.

        • Notnuthavingpirater

           Just like your mum and dad eh?

        • JaTillPiratz

          Throttling affects the protocol. The protocol itself is benign – it is neither ‘good’ nor ‘evil’, just as the hypertext transfer protocol or the post office protocol are likewise not attributed such human attributes.

          You’re suggesting that because some people choose to use the protocol for unlawful activities every user of the protocol should suffer no matter what they’re doing. This is counter-intuitive to the development of web technologies which will improve distribution for the entertainment industry’s own approved content.

          http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/newsroom/cf/research-detail.cfm?item_id=8219

        • http://profiles.google.com/xanas3712 Matthew Swaringen

          You’re on the evil side of that struggle.  Honest people are those who don’t seek to control everyone else.  The state is a criminal institution at the core, using violence to enforce obedience and theft to pay for it.  

    • FOAD

      Deleting comments from Nejtillpirater is the future. 
      Douchebag started his blog because he claims “censorship” by Rick Falkvinge. 

      What a fucking hypocrite you are.  ASSHOLE! 
      Fuck Off and DIE!

    • Jon7272

      see telcos lose milions as we might as well have 2gig limits not big 500 gig to unlimited plans good luck with that troll on second thoughts why bother with pcs at all 

    • Guest

      Because only pirates would want and appreciate fast Internet and data transfer speeds, right?

      You still haven’t explained how this would help artists, Nej! Or how money taken from the Pirate Bay not given to artists would help artists, either! How long are you going to be a little bitch and not answer the questions that really matter?

  • Mstargard

    Things have changed in Canada. Used to have heavy throttling, but then the ISP’s stopped when it looked like they might be considered Broadcasters because they were manipulating video and demonstrating control. ISPs elsewhere might want to take notice that throttling could increase their liability.

    • JaTillPiratz

      Indeed. If ISPs censor lawful sites on the web then they may well find themselves in an actionable position under trading standards laws. They have sold their service as ‘internet access’, not as ‘partial internet access’. Millions of people may now have a case that they have been mis-sold the service. The ToS typically define that your use of the service is limited to ‘legal’ activities, however, if you’re legally using BitTorrent – let’s say, for instance, you’re downloading a Linux distro’s LiveCD via torrent – then throttling all traffic on that protocol will directly impact your legitimate use and become a breach of your customer rights under the contract you have with your service provider.

  • Chillinfart

    ENG: It’s weird and disappointing that America Movil (Claro) is not listed here, despite two cases of traffic shaping reported in peru.

    The 2011 issue is in the ISP black list from Vuze.
    http://wiki.vuze.com/w/Bad_ISPs#Per.C3.BA

    And currently, Claro is redirecting/blocking traffic from some ports to trick the Glasnost test, but the trap in a certain moment comes to be evidenced (in spanish).

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=velV9572eZM

    These issues happens on it´s mobile internet services. However, in last months Claro was testing these measures to other internet services.

    ESP: Es extraño y decepcionante que America Movil (Claro) no esté listado aquí, pese a que se han publicado dos casos de limitaciones de tráfico en el perú.

    El caso del 2011 está en la lista negra de Vuze.

    http://wiki.vuze.com/w/Bad_ISPs#Per.C3.BA

    Y actualmente, Claro viene redireccionando/bloqueando el tráfico de algunos puertos para burlar la prueba Glasnost, aunque la trampa en un determinado momento llega a ser evidenciada.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=velV9572eZM

  • theonlyone

    My internet connection seems to drop off and disconnect whenever I transfer files larger than a few mb through ftp. Mysterious and suspect. Time Warner

  • Pingback: Estudo mostra que NET é a principal inimiga dos torrents no Brasil | Consultoria Jr

  • Pingback: Estudo mostra que NET é a principal inimiga dos torrents no Brasil | Mundo Net XD

  • Pingback: New Data Exposes BitTorrent Throttling ISPs | The Illuminati

  • Pingback:   Estudo mostra que NET é a principal inimiga dos torrents no Brasil by AGREGA LINK – Agregador de Noticias e Informações

  • ZengaTeee

    I personally find that to be very annoying. Wow.
    Go-Private.tk

  • Pingback: tecboo » NET Virtua é a pricipal inimiga dos torrents segundo estudos

  • zeelandnet

    I cant believe that so many countries are so far behind or so greedy with their bandwidth. The UK, USA and Canada. I am hearing all sorts of data limits/caps limited speed throttling. I live in the netherelands. I have 2 choice’s cable provider or telefoon provider. Zeelandnet has the whole of Zeeland for themselves but for 50Euro’s you can have 50Mbit ( max is 80 and 8 I think )down and 6mbit up, when transfering from my sbox ftp to my home I usually get more that my alocated bandwidth in short bursts but on average its either the full speed or above. There is a FUP but I’ve never had a dear jon letter from the about bandwidth abuse. If you want to go through the telefoon ( which lets be honest use’s fiber in their trunk lines for many years now )   the choices are ADSL1 to 12 Mbit – 1Mbit  ADSL2 20Mbit – 2Mbit and of course VDSL at 40Mbit – 4Mbit and 80Mbit – 8Mbit  http://www.kpn.com/prive/internet.htm
    I live in a small village where you wouldn’t expect to have highspeed access.
    Are we luck here or are other countries greedy so and so’s and will not upgrade their infrastructure. I dont know you tell me.
    Oh and 1 more thing. My father worked for BT all his life and I remember him coming from work with loads of paperwork regarding fiber. This was more than 30 years ago and BT have been running fiber trunk lines from that era till now. Sometimes I dont get that when someone says are you on the fiber or the copper. Both run on fiber and both run copper from the junctionbox in the street to your home.
    Anyway seems like holland is pretty much ahead of other countries for sure.

    • Jon7272

      and australia 

  • Herdygerdy

    Moved house and got BT Infinity with plans to boost my ratio on a few sites only to find they throttle p2p download speeds at peak time (Weekdays 4pm to midnight, Weekends 9am to midnight) which I was fine with but soon discovered that they throttled p2p upload speed 24/7 and was uploading at just 70 kB/sec. Got a seedbox in the end, couldn’t be happier

  • Pingback: Comcast has been well-behaved ever since the FCC smacked it down over BitTorrent throttling | AVORAH - Geek Lifestyle Reviews And Views - TECH, GADGETS, STYLE.

  • Pingback: Not So Secret Answers | Jupiter Broadcasting

  • Anonymous

    I use cox.. im rather surprized this report says they throttle 6%.
    I have never noticed any throttling.
    TBH I go over the monthly limits quite regularly and never even see them enforce slower speeds for the remainder of the month.

  • Pingback: Estudo mostra que NET é a principal inimiga dos torrents no Brasil - Canapum Service

  • Pingback: Estudo mostra que NET e Embratel são provedores que mais praticam traffic shaping no Brasil | Por um internet melhor!

  • ScrewEwe2

    I’ve noticed that my BT download speeds are cut in half sometimes while going through the VPN as opposed to BT download speeds while not going through the VPN. I’ve never seen or experienced BT traffic throttling from my ISP. Of course everything can be skewed by number of seeds and their upload speeds.

  • Pingback: Aktuelles 10. August 2012 — neunetz.com

  • steve.

    I’ve been with AOL for years and never had any problems apart from crap customer service. sometimes when i have been heavily torrenting, they throttle my http access, but not my torrents… which is weird…. considering they’re also owned by one quarter of the music/movie biz….

    • Anonymouse

       LOL limit your torrent clients maximum upload speed this isn’t your ISP you are
      choking your connection set your mamimum upload to 90% of that available.

  • Anonymouse

    LOL well there is a surprise BT is the Worst ISP in the UK.

  • Pingback: Estudo mostra as empresas no Brasil que diminuem a velocidade do seus torrents, faça o teste.

  • g h

    I live in Grand Falls Newfieland and I have 2 choices..

    Bell or Rogers but I’m looking into Teksavvy because apparently they offer unlimited for a few more bucks at set-up modem etc..

    If it works to my benefit I will drop rogers YESTERDAY..

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=596574811 Alan Anderson

    DoDo customer here in australia and im glad. :)

  • Pingback: Limiti al traffico del P2P: in Italia la situazione non è pessima » SeeYouLike

  • Asashii

    i tell people to encrypt in their client, ISP usually quits being throttled and they like me for it, ISP cant throttle what they dont see, its just now data to them, works for every COMCAST user that has asked me!!!!

  • Pingback: Not the friendliest place for BitTorrent users - City-Data Forum

  • bhell better than robbers

    As of March 2012, Bell Canada has stopped using their Sandvine DPI boxes in most locations around Canada.

    Rogers on the other hand still does in most areas but vowed to eliminate them by the beginning of 2013. 

    • Miami Sunset

       Bell’s system was easy enough to bypass with the proper torrent settings. It’s possible that they were loosing too many customers.

  • Pingback: New Data Exposes BitTorrent Throttling ISPs | Zombie Torrents - Ultimate Torrents Downloads

  • theonlyone

     Best way around it: Get a seedbox. You wont believe the speed. The one I use gives me a VPN to use.Download files through FTP. Fuck the trolls and fuck the ISP.

  • Pingback: uTorrent upload speed seems "throttled" - Page 2

  • Pingback: Social Media White Noise » Blog Archive » #90: Closing Ceremony Cash In

  • Pingback: New Data Exposes BitTorrent Throttling ISPs – August 09, 2012 at 08:15AM | Lifestream

  • Pingback: New Data Exposes BitTorrent Throttling ISPs – August 09, 2012 at 08:15AM | Lifestream

  • Pingback: Estudo mostra que NET e Embratel são provedores que mais praticam traffic shaping no Brasil | RS Sistemas - Tecnologia da Informação

  • Pingback: Top 10 uTorrent Alternatives | TorrentFreak

  • wjohnc@gmail.com

    Demonoid member for 10 years. Please invite me in! The other torrent sites suck. 

  • Pingback: Top 10 uTorrent Alternatives | Nyheter

  • Pingback: New Data Exposes BitTorrent Throttling ISPs | Nyheter

  • BTGuard - BitTorrent Anonymously

NewsBits

Even more news...

  • Pirate Bay Founder Gottfrid Svartholm on Freedom of Speech

    Freedom of speech is a highly valued commodity, but should people be allowed to say whatever...

  • Blu-ray Anti-Piracy Tech Stops Discs and Promotes Purchases

    An anti-piracy system present in all official Blu-ray players since 2012 has received a fresh update...

  • Foxtel Breeds Pirates by Locking Up Game of Thrones

    One of the main reasons why people turn to piracy is the lack of legal alternatives....

  • UK Student Admits Breaching Sony Copyrights With Leak of PS3 SDK

    Last year an Internet user known as El Nomeo leaked version 3.70 of Sony’s Playstation3 SDK...

  • Pirates Can Be Identified Despite Sharing IP Addresses, ISP Claims

    Carrier-Grade Network Address Translation is a network mechanism through which many Internet subscribers can share the...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

PopularArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.