TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

Super 8 Screener Leaks – With Howard Stern’s Name All Over It

A high-quality copy of the Steven Spielberg movie ‘Super 8′ has turned up online and is spreading like wildfire. While it is hardly unusual for preview copy DVD screeners to become available in this way, it is unusual for them to carry watermarks which appear to identify the source of the leak. Come Monday morning, Howard Stern might have some questions to answer.

Back in June, Paramount Pictures were setting their lawyers on Todd Blatt, a mechanical engineer from Baltimore.

Blatt had used his design skills and 3D printing company ShapeWays to come up with replicas of the strange cube-shaped objects seen in the Steven Spielberg movie, Super 8.

While that confrontation appeared to end fairly bloodlessly, a new copyright controversy surrounding the movie may not.

Poor-quality cammed copies of Super 8 started turning up online as soon as the movie premiered, but during the last 24 hours the game has gotten a whole lot more interesting. Several P2P release groups have uploaded the movie in high-quality, each one apparently sourced from the same studio-issued DVD Screener.

As can be seen from the screenshot below, the copy has the usual watermarks across the bottom of the screen stating that the movie is the property of Paramount Pictures. However, in the top right hand corner is another watermark which appears to indicate who the copy was given to – H STERN.

Super 8 Watermark

The watermark runs throughout the entire copy and although it’s possible that someone is trying to have some fun at Mr Stern’s expense by putting it there, it seems unlikely that a release group would do such a thing.

Furthermore, if that was the case and a clean ‘unpranked’ copy was available, it would turn up very quickly indeed. At the moment it seems that all release groups are using the same source.

A few hours ago Stern stylist Ralph Cirella denied having anything to do with the leak.

Ralph

The other possibility of course is that there is another H STERN on the DVD Screener list. Likely? We’ll probably find out on Monday.

Related Posts

Previous Post | Next Post

  • Time to play ball

    Haha this should be interesting. Please do a follow up on the story tomorrow if possible.

    • golul

      “I Have Right”, heheh I love to see screener like that and still wait hi-res release, ;-).

      • Guest

        The most disgusting thing is that WE HAVE TO PAY TO WATCH MOVIES idiots like H. Stern watch them for FREE.

        One more reason not to buy movies.

        • Dr Necessito

          The movie companies give free screeners to guys like Howard Stern in the hopes that they will talk about them on the air. It’s called ‘promotion,’ dummy.

        • Dylan

          Howard Stern is a critic. He gets paid to watch movies and then talk about what he liked/disliked about them. Most of the time, you don’t even get to keep the screeners.

      • Guest

        The most disgusting thing is that WE HAVE TO PAY TO WATCH MOVIES idiots like H. Stern watch them for FREE.

        One more reason not to buy movies.

    • Joe

      Problem is Howard shouldn’t be passing around the screeners to his staff, that’s probably why no one sends him a screener in the first place.

      • http://twitter.com/ehurtley Ed Hurtley

        That happens with anyone that gets sent a screener.

        I’ve had the studio-pressed screener in my hands that was handed down about six or seven times until it reached me. I don’t even know who it was originally given to, I just know that a friend of a friend (I’ve met him once,) works in the movie industry, and was the source. Where *HE* got it from, I assume is someone that gets screeners.

      • Petrol42

        Problem is you don’t listen to Howard Stern and you’re spreading around min-information.

        If you listened to his show, then you would know the studios refused to send him screeners for a long time until a caller called in and said he’d give Howard a downloaded copy of Xmen:Origins. A person from the studio called in the next day and begged Howard not to watch that copy because it wasn’t complete and he would start sending Howard screeners.

        Also, if you listened to his show, you would know that he wouldn’t pass the DVD screener around because he’s always scared of getting busted and he doesn’t want to deal with the repercussion.

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_YFQ37SLWTB7GWJCUGWWYLYUZHE Green Su

      Here is a very nice co-mmunity

      ~~~~ Mil Cupid * C O M ~~~~

      It’s where sing-les looking for someone to enjoy their lifestyle with. Come in and stay a while. Complete your profile. Post a message, a picture of yourself and check out the photo galleries.

      Give it a try, you will find someone you like here – ;)

  • Wrath of the Tyrant

    Baba Booey Baba Booey Shitty Movie Baba Booey!

  • http://twitter.com/K1rkpad Dylan Kirkpatrick

    That’ll teach ‘em to keep their stuff protected if they really care about their property! Silly Paramount.

    • http://tinyurl.com/ANoiXioNA-personal-info ANoiXioNA

      Agree….sorta… if they really care about monetising the cinema experience to the complete maximum.

      my opinion : Cam releases are not good….. Let them make cash from the cinema event…….
      (at least that’s worth paying for )

      The studio Releasing “screeners” ( dvd PRE releases ) as and before the film is in the cinemas……. STUPID Paramount……
      They should just give out free cinema tickets rather than leaking Data themselves .
      Another example of the old business model failing to grip reality……..

      Paramount leaked digital copies the film…… it is their fault…

      • Wrath of the Tyrant

        Are you kidding?!? I burn cams and play ‘em on my big screen with surround sound!! You’re missing out, my friend!

        • Andrew Morales

          Sorry, some of us like to see, like, details in our movies.

          DVDs are bad enough, but cams are total garbage. Even HD is a compromise.

        • Fhiiofwq

          Yeah, no. I’m betting your surround sound comes from a box which would tell me how much value you put into your cinema experience.

          All cams are awful looking and the sound is always horrible.

        • Koliedrus Smytheburg

          @Andrew
          I may be picking nits here. It was mentioned that R2D2 could be seen floating amongst battle debris in the last Star Trek.

          I shuttled to the scene, stepped to the frame and saw a detail that sticks in my mind far longer than any resolution available for more that an instant,

          Resolution isn’t simply a matter of picture quality. Neither is the perception of detail a given because of one’s media interface’s ability to resolve details most will miss.

          If you want true detail in a movie, read the book.

        • Wrath of the Tyrant

          I see my snark goes unappreciated once more…

      • Farkwad

        Meh. The “cinema experience” isn’t any fun. Relying on that will fail in the future. I mean, what can they offer? Movies at a higher price, with expensive food, in uncomfortable seats that always hurt my back. It’s not like concerts, which offer something unique; all cinemas can offer is the big screen, and that isn’t worth the price.

        For that matter, how could videogames become a service-only industry? The non-multiplayer ones I mean. They’ve traditionally relied entirely on the quality of their product. It seems like the only “service” they could give is streaming, which isn’t working well for the companies who try it and still isn’t offering anything unique over downloads.

        Doesn’t seem like a good idea to me.

        • Tosser

          I’m sorry you have a shit cinema.

          And don’t buy food from them – it’s expensive and the guy sitting next to you while you stuff and slurp and crunch will hate you. It’s people like you that make people like you moan about the cinema.

        • Farkwad

          I don’t buy food at the cinema. The “it being expensive” thing kinda prevents me from buying. And this isn’t about any 1 cinema, it’s about all of them. Particularly the chair thing. Those places are a nightmare for people with back problems.

          Tell me then, what do cinemas offer that you can’t get at home? I don’t see any good answer to that question.

        • Brudda

          watching a movie in a cinema is a complete crap

          can’t take a drink in with me, but i like a drink when i watch a movie?
          sorry, i am not going to pay ridiculous prices for cola, especially when i want beer.
          can’t take my own food in with me, but i like to munch when i watch a movie?
          sorry, no, i am not going to pay £5 for 10 pence worth of popcorn.
          can’t smoke a few spliffs at the cinema. but i like to have a smoke when i watch a movie?

          add to that uncomfy seats, tall people with big hair, etc etc…

          cinema sucks

        • Brudda

          watching a movie in a cinema is a complete crap

          can’t take a drink in with me, but i like a drink when i watch a movie?
          sorry, i am not going to pay ridiculous prices for cola, especially when i want beer.
          can’t take my own food in with me, but i like to munch when i watch a movie?
          sorry, no, i am not going to pay £5 for 10 pence worth of popcorn.
          can’t smoke a few spliffs at the cinema. but i like to have a smoke when i watch a movie?

          add to that uncomfy seats, tall people with big hair, etc etc…

          cinema sucks

        • gae

          Don’t forget screaming kids, teenagers throwing popcorn about and people on phones, plus 30 mnutes of advertisements before the movie begins.

        • http://twitter.com/K1rkpad Dylan Kirkpatrick

          If your theater is like mine, they don’t search backpacks… so go and buy some bulk pop and candy!

        • Danny

          Yeah I always take snacks a few brewskis in to the cinema in my backpack. They cannot legally search your bag, no matter what they say! Only real problem is you can’t get them to pause the film when you need to take a piss!

          Cinemas are expensive (I mean tickets), uncomfy, usually poor view of screen, expensive (again for good measure). I much prefer my cinema setup at home, even if its on a small screen I like to be comfy!

        • Danny

          Yeah I always take snacks a few brewskis in to the cinema in my backpack. They cannot legally search your bag, no matter what they say! Only real problem is you can’t get them to pause the film when you need to take a piss!

          Cinemas are expensive (I mean tickets), uncomfy, usually poor view of screen, expensive (again for good measure). I much prefer my cinema setup at home, even if its on a small screen I like to be comfy!

        • Farkwad

          Precisely. If we ask movies to rely on cinemas for their money, particularly as the ability to watch at home improves, then the people who make movies will be fucked. I don’t know about you guys, but if I could get a good copy of the movie at home at the same time it came out in theatres, I’d never go to the cinema again. There’s just nothing they can possibly offer to me.

          I don’t think service models can possibly account for everything we have now. It just seems like something will be lost. Cultural production will decrease, or something like that. Anyone disagree?

        • Re|3uilt

          muvico.com
          take a vacation….. cocktails, dinner, IMAX, all from one luv seat!
          not cheap, bring your ccard, but worth every penny if you dial in the right film and companion.

      • Jonekat

        what……is……up………with……all…..the……periods……….???? dipstick………

        • http://tinyurl.com/ANoiXioNA-personal-info ANoiXioNA

          like it …. or loathe it……It’s the way I speak…..

          If YOU think it makes me a “dipstick”…… then obviously I am a dipstick.

          YOU are after all …. The definer of peoples….The categoriser of personalities….

          The way I communicate defines me….. as me.

          The way YOU communicate ( call people dipstick for using/having a textual accent ) defines you….. as you.

          I would rather be me.
          I don’t call people names for having an accent or for writing in a particular way……horror…even with spelling mistakes or syntax errors.
          Communication is the whole purpose of ALL text and languages.
          If you understand…. the message is good….( works as desired )

          It’s shallow…. as to disregard content… based on appearance…

          Wonder if you would be a good person to show ….a picture of me? …
          maybe not:
          You..(no one else ).. YOU could probably tell my IQ from just my picture…..

        • http://tinyurl.com/ANoiXioNA-personal-info ANoiXioNA

          like it …. or loathe it……It’s the way I speak…..

          If YOU think it makes me a “dipstick”…… then obviously I am a dipstick.

          YOU are after all …. The definer of peoples….The categoriser of personalities….

          The way I communicate defines me….. as me.

          The way YOU communicate ( call people dipstick for using/having a textual accent ) defines you….. as you.

          I would rather be me.
          I don’t call people names for having an accent or for writing in a particular way……horror…even with spelling mistakes or syntax errors.
          Communication is the whole purpose of ALL text and languages.
          If you understand…. the message is good….( works as desired )

          It’s shallow…. as to disregard content… based on appearance…

          Wonder if you would be a good person to show ….a picture of me? …
          maybe not:
          You..(no one else ).. YOU could probably tell my IQ from just my picture…..

        • Anonymous

          Well, if that wasn’t a cop-out answer…

        • Anonymous

          Well, if that wasn’t a cop-out answer…

        • http://tinyurl.com/ANoiXioNA-personal-info ANoiXioNA

          @ Anonymous /

          lol ..

        • Jonekat

          ” textual accent” possibly the gayest thing I have heard all week LOL, from my perspective it appears you are incapable of putting together a complete sentence, for which there can only be three explanations, laziness, incompetence or drug use.I am leaning towards drug use, incomplete sentences and losing your train of thought are typical of someone that types with one hand and has a bong in the other

          If you want people to understand what your thinking quit with the stupid periods or at least use them in moderation and finish writing what your thinking!

          We are not mind readers…..

        • http://www.newbspeak.com Newbs

          ANoiXioNA, ellipses have three dots, not four, and they have a defined, concrete usage in English grammar. You can use as many dots as you want, of course, but you probably shouldn’t call it an ellipsis. And you definitely shouldn’t assume that it carries any sort of common meaning (or pause or whatever) that others besides you will understand. It’s your personal style, yes, but it certainly does make you look like a dipstick.

          Also, you write like Harry Knowles. That’s not a compliment.

  • Pingback: Super 8 Screener Leaks – With Howard Stern’s Name All Over It | We R Pirates

  • Anonymous

    been said countless times before, if you dont want it released on the net before it gets to cinemas, keep it from the net by not producing pre-release copies and giving them to anyone. this is clearly the way NOT to do that! wonder what excuses will be used this time?

    • Anonymous

      II. Negligence
      The law of negligence has a long history, and it morphs over time. The unchanging elements of a negligence claim are:

      * Duty – did Paramount Pictures have a duty?
      * Breach – did Paramount Pictures breach that duty?
      * Causation – was the breach the cause of the investors damages?
      * Damages – were there damages, and if so, how much?

      Whether or not there is a duty is where the most debate occurs. Whether or not there is a duty is a matter of law for the court to decide, and some courts have already endorsed the theory that there may be a duty to keep your movie secured.

      That’s what negligence is: It is the law saying “You really should have seen that coming.” When you do something careless, and that carelessness costs someone else money, you pay the ”carelessness tax” – Negligence.

    • Nano Marble

      No doubt the guy will get a STERN warning ;)

      • http://tinyurl.com/ANoiXioNA-personal-info ANoiXioNA

        PUN OF THE DAY : )

        +1

        Puns make me smile cos they are so bad……

    • Nano Marble

      No doubt the guy will get a STERN warning ;)

    • Re|3uilt

      sorry but you have once again failed your business marketing 101 class and as a result now forfeit your remaining tuition towards rehabilitating kids with down-syndrome. please leave this class at once.

  • Andrew Morales

    Super 8 isn’t a Steven Spielberg film, it’s a J.J. Abrams film. Spielberg was just a producer. When the term “A (so and so) Film” is used, it describes the director, not one of the producers.

  • Andrew Morales

    Super 8 isn’t a Steven Spielberg film, it’s a J.J. Abrams film. Spielberg was just a producer. When the term “A (so and so) Film” is used, it describes the director, not one of the producers.

    • well

      Agree! J.J. Abrams is both the director and the writer of the film. Enigmax needed a flashy intro for the feature I guess, but it’s not accurate still.

      Like when they promote Falling Skies with Spielbergs’ name and he’s just there for marketing.

  • Anonymous

    Lol … Social Networking Fail : http://i.imgur.com/U6gUS.jpg

    • Anonymous

      howso?

      • Anonymous

        Isnt Get-Glueing your torrent downloads = callingup the studios and telling that you just downloaded their freshly baked screeners ?

      • Anonymous

        Isnt Get-Glueing your torrent downloads = callingup the studios and telling that you just downloaded their freshly baked screeners ?

  • mMeh

    I doubt that’s the way studios watermark screeners (except “property of” stuff). Aren’t those the watermarks invisible?

    • Anonymous

      How else would you see who leaked it? I thought they used numbers btw, but ok. In some movies you can see a transparent blur in a small rectangle somewhere in the screen.

      • Exoren22

        Those blurs are cappers who remove the network watermark. that means it was captured from OTA or Cable/Satellite.

  • Pingback: P2PTalk » Super 8 Screener Leaks – With Howard Stern’s Name All Over It

  • Pingback: The Howard Stern Show leaks a watermarked copy of Super 8 - TNW Insider

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_EYIPTOCDFJZ5M6G33BZINT4KPE Hrk Sa

    Here is a very nice co-mmunity

    ~~~~ Mil Cupid * C O M ~~~~

    It’s where sing-les looking for someone to enjoy their lifestyle with. Come in and stay a while. Complete your profile. Post a message, a picture of yourself and check out the photo galleries.

    Give it a try, you will find someone you like here – ;)

  • http://twitter.com/sohail20 sohail

    ha i remember downloading the source files :P !
    epic release :)
    plus there is green lantern screener out soon :P

    • Someoneyouknow

      Sir, allow me to call bullshit. Move on.

  • Mike

    I doubt he did it (he is crazy but not stupid) someone who cleans his house could have picked it out the player. You just can’t stop that stuff. Be be interesting nonetheless to see if they go for him or if he gets a pass. Hypocrisy will surely be shown as he gets away with it with zero penalties because of who he is.

    • Anonymous

      And i bet he would not leave his name in it… Would be a bit dumb. Or is it brilliant?

  • http://Twitter.com/elisaknockout Elisa ? Knockout™

    Lmao. Hollyweird and their crazy shenanigan’s ;P

  • Strdan

    Secure your wireless connection!

  • http://www.facebook.com/chronoss.uha1 Chronoss Uha

    and those p2p groups with this copy you should be extremely leary of….look where its coming from…

  • Bababooey666

    Probably just somebody messing with him. Stern has complained on his show numerous times about how movie studios are reluctant to let him have screeners because they’re worried the movies will get out.

    • Anonymous

      Perhaps but for that same reason if they were to send him a screener then what better way to avoid his neglect and a release then to write his name over the entire movie? Better than some hidden watermarkers that the people encoding can simply remove. He sees his name there and he takes better care of it.

      I think Paramount and the rest may have found a new name and shame method for their preview DVD screeners. Sure the people encoding can still blank out this source naming but that would harm a section of each frame.

      We may see a lot more of this in the future. Then again if you see some B OBAMA, M JACKSON, E PRESLEY, O BIN LADEN, A MONKEY and more pop up you have good reason to be doubtful.

  • Bababooey666

    Probably just somebody messing with him. Stern has complained on his show numerous times about how movie studios are reluctant to let him have screeners because they’re worried the movies will get out.

  • anonYmouse

    BLURRED ViSiON appeared on the 5th August ;)

  • Critic

    The movie itself is quite average, entertaining at best.
    1) The alien makes no sense, an advanced being that mainly lives underground (as in he burrows into the ground), has no clothes, has been kept locked up for years but know instinctively where to get and how to use human made electrical components to create a super magnet….. I could go on…
    2) Weak acting from almost all of the characters except for Elle Fanning who shines as a very capable and emotional actress.
    3) Human interaction is unbelievable, first the kids are told the military will kill them, they see an alien on their film, then they get evacuated to an army base even though they were told the army was after them, they go back to the scene of the derailment to shoot their movie while the army is there cleaning up and nobody asks them anything, the army guys take tire track prints but they don’t try to find the vehicle the fled the scene, the pyromaniac kid is told to distract the “monster” with firecrackers, he accepts an is apparently unafraid even if he just witnessed the alien eating a corpse. Joe rescues Alice and they take time to chat and hug in the middle of the beast’s lair… Tell me when to stop…
    4) When the tanks went through the city and the gun were firing uncontrollably, why is it that the soldiers kept on reloading the guns? Kids run around the town, no soldiers stop them even if the town had been previously evacuated… How did the Colonel know that the kids were at the school? (it was never explained). The “bad guy” (Noah Emmerich) dies way too early rendering impossible a showdown at the end of the movie, Too little time is spent on the weird cubes and their special properties.

    5) Finally, people disappearing everywhere, soldiers everywhere, forest fire, drama overload and the kids can’t stop shooting their movie… It’s retarded!

    There are so many things wrong with this movie that you lose interest very early and never get back into it.

    • Nano Marble

      You probably werent paying attention to the bit where the guy says “it bonded with him” ya know, in the black n white film reel where it picks him up !!! so all the others it touches it also bonds with them too thus using that knowledge knows what all the stuff is for…

      You must have watched the shite quality cam where the sound is bad and the picture is fcuked up…
      I watched Mr Sterns copy in 264 and 5.1 and was also paying attention to it…

      Fail :p

    • Re|3uilt

      you could go on? you do go on being an idiot.

  • Bsmith

    You people obviously know nothing about industry screeners. They never – ever – have a person’s name at the bottom. Screeners are, however, always labelled digitally. That label is not visible on the screen. The “H Stern” story is obviously one that was planted by someone with an axe to grind or a need for their 15-minutes of fame.

    • Darksource

      PMSL Was this your attempt to sound smart. Next time research more before you try to open your mouth and babble! Also there was no name at the bottom dumb ass it was in the upper right hand corner.

    • Re|3uilt

      “They never – ever – have a person’s name at the bottom. Screeners are, however, always labelled digitally.” really…?!?? ever never ever….hawt dude!
      you do realize this is not a VHScreener.
      watermarks are now common practice, and studios do, in fact, watermark the individuals name on the release. either you’re an academy member, celebrity, money burning producer, or as in Howard’s case, a “media-ngelical” who happens to be on a very exclusive list of receiving parties. BTW, fame has been revised to 13mins & 14sec before going away
      [unless however, one has hawtness!! like yourself]

  • Pingback: Report: Howard Stern linked to pirated ‘Super 8′ » MeetMeDaily.com

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Siouxmoux-Riopel/593732867 Siouxmoux Riopel

    Howard Stern is not the only one and Mass majority of Movie Goer ‘all agreed that Super 8 sux. And no one should have to pay money to watch this crap.

    • Nano Marble

      It may not have been “A” grade but it didn’t suck as much as Cloverfield that’s for sure…

  • Pingback: Report: Howard Stern linked to pirated ‘Super 8′ » 99dzh

  • Pingback: Report: Howard Stern linked to pirated ‘Super 8′ | Partners In Sublime

  • Pingback: Is Howard Stern to Blame for ‘Super 8′ Movie Leak? (PC Magazine) | World News Line

  • Pingback: Is Howard Stern Torrenting the Movie ‘Super 8′? | Anchorage Daily News

  • Pingback: Is Howard Stern Torrenting the Movie ‘Super 8′? | Torrents & File Sharing News

  • Tr_13t

    it is obviously some sort of scam. think about it… this screener contained none of the typical normal Howard Stern recognitions such as a repeated outburst of the word “fuck”. this is a family move. come on ya all, some one is “fucking” with ya all

  • Pingback: Is Howard Stern to Blame for ‘Super 8′ Movie Leak? (PC Magazine) | Breaking News Today

  • Pingback: My Story, Report: Howard Stern linked to pirated ‘Super 8′ | Vote My Story

  • Pingback: Is Howard Stern to Blame for ‘Super 8′ Movie Leak? (PC Magazine) | News Bulletins

  • Pingback: Is Howard Stern to Blame for ‘Super 8′ Movie Leak? (PC Magazine) | Gadget News And Reviews

  • Pingback: Is Howard Stern to Blame for ‘Super 8′ Movie Leak? (PC Magazine) | Stock Market News - Business & Tech News

  • Pingback: Report: Howard Stern linked to pirated ‘Super 8′ | Pros Global TV

  • User

    imo its a publicity stunt ;)

    • Guest

      But if we think about the consequences in MAFIAA’s perspective (‘lost sales’) it doesn’t seem so.

  • Guest

    It’s not a Steven Spielberg move, it’s a J.J. Abrams movie :)

  • Pingback: Super 8 en fuite sur le net | Korben

  • Pingback: Super 8 en fuite sur le net | Korben

  • Pingback: Super 8 en fuite sur le net | Korben

  • Pingback: Generall » Super 8 leaks online, possibly from Howard Stern

  • Pingback: Is Howard Stern Responsible For BitTorrent Super 8 Release? | Gizmodo Australia

  • Pingback: Er Howard Stern Ansvarlig for Piratkopierede Super 8 Udgivelse? [Film] | PCTV

  • Pingback: Screener des Films “Super 8” aufgetaucht, von prominenter Hand bereitgestellt? » t3n News

  • Danny

    Who the fuck is howard stern anyhow?
    Just another american nobody I guess…….

    • Jonekat

      Howard stern is the last guy to fuck your mom before you were born, to bad she changed her mind on the abortion lol ;0)

  • Pingback: SilentDefender.co.uk » Blog Archive » Report: Howard Stern linked to pirated ‘Super 8′

  • Pingback: Super 8 leaks online, possibly from Howard Stern

  • Koisville

    Howard Stern is going to enter in the world of hurt…

  • Koisville

    Howard Stern is going to enter in the world of hurt…

  • Koisville

    Howard Stern is going to enter in the world of hurt…

  • Fsaken

    Didn’t know that Stern jackoff still existed

  • https://thepiratebay.org/user/manOtor/ manOtor

    I for one am just greatful it was leaked.
    But I don’t agree with the majority of the movie goers (if it is true what is stated some comments above – which I doubt. Imdb rating is 7/10)
    I LOVED this movie.
    Thank you, leaking person, that you made it possible for me to watch this fine peace of work in great quality rather sooner than later :)!

  • Pingback: The Interesting News Thread - Page 257

  • BTGuard - BitTorrent Anonymously

NewsBits

Even more news...

  • Pirate Bay Founder Gottfrid Svartholm on Freedom of Speech

    Freedom of speech is a highly valued commodity, but should people be allowed to say whatever...

  • Blu-ray Anti-Piracy Tech Stops Discs and Promotes Purchases

    An anti-piracy system present in all official Blu-ray players since 2012 has received a fresh update...

  • Foxtel Breeds Pirates by Locking Up Game of Thrones

    One of the main reasons why people turn to piracy is the lack of legal alternatives....

  • UK Student Admits Breaching Sony Copyrights With Leak of PS3 SDK

    Last year an Internet user known as El Nomeo leaked version 3.70 of Sony’s Playstation3 SDK...

  • Pirates Can Be Identified Despite Sharing IP Addresses, ISP Claims

    Carrier-Grade Network Address Translation is a network mechanism through which many Internet subscribers can share the...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

PopularArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.