TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

uTorrent Download Speeds Beat Vuze By 16%

A new study comparing the download speeds of more than 10 million BitTorrent users found that uTorrent users achieve significantly higher download speeds than those who use Vuze. On some ISPs this advantage, which is attributed to differences in design choices, can be as much as 30%.

utorrentFor nearly half a decade uTorrent and Vuze have been two of the leading BitTorrent clients. If we leave out China, the two applications together hold three quarters of the market share which equals close to 100 million users a month.

In an attempt to determine which of the two get the best download speeds, University of California researcher Marios Iliofotou together with colleagues from Telefonica Research inspected the download speeds of more than 10 million BitTorrent downloaders last August. The results have been collated in a short paper (pdf) and it turns out that there are some big differences between the two BitTorrent clients.

As an initial sample the 600 most popular torrents on the Pirate Bay were used. The torrents were tracked for a month and a representative sample of one week was used for the final analysis. For each torrent an equal number or uTorrent and Vuze users were selected and these were also matched by ISP, so the type of torrent or ISP could not influence the results.

The research revealed a remarkable speed difference with uTorrent users getting 16% higher download speeds than Vuze users. On average uTorrent users reached a 176 Kbps download speed while Vuze users were stuck at 151 Kbps on the same torrents and with the same ISPs.

More detailed analysis revealed that uTorrent users get faster downloads on all of the 30 most used ISPs, except Verizon where there was virtually no difference. On 10% of these ISPs, uTorrent users were downloading 30% faster than Vuze users.

uTorrent vs. Vuze speeds

utorrent vuze

To find out what might be responsible for these speed differences the researchers reverse engineered both BitTorrent clients. They speculate that the distribution of upload capacity to peers is one of the underlying reasons. On average, uTorrent shares data with more peers than Vuze.

Differences in how the clients handles connections to ‘neighbors’, how they discover new peers and when they decide to close connections are also mentioned as factors that may have led to the observed speed differences.

The scope of the report is limited to Vuze and uTorrent but in future work the researchers hope to include other clients too. In addition they plan to confirm these results in a lab environment, to try and find out what constitutes the fastest BitTorrent client.

“This work does not aim to design the best BitTorrent client, but to bring to the attention of BitTorrent implementors and users that some design choices have a significant effect in practice. Even though in our study uTorrent appears to achieve faster speeds than Vuze, we do not claim that uTorrent is the way to go,” the researchers write.

“We hope that our preliminary findings will open the door for new research efforts to better understand the impact of design choices in the performance of real-world BitTorrent implementations. Ultimately, we see such research efforts leading to the design of better P2P systems,” the researchers conclude.

Related Posts

Previous Post | Next Post

  • adam

    and macs suck.

  • ____

    at least i have never noticed any speed falls when using vuze. but still using utorrent=)

  • Vuzer

    Paper is almost a year old, and using an old version of Vuze, v4.2. The latest v4.3 version has been noticeably faster for me, so time for a retest !

  • Kmaid

    @1 QFT. Macs are the fast food of tech teaching ignorance rather than proper use IMHO.

    I am surprised that the difference was as big as this. I wonder how they did the study with everyone having a different setup etc.

  • Pingback: Pirate Home Page » uTorrent Download Speeds Beat Vuze By 16%

  • lol

    and mac sucks

  • .

    “As an initial sample the 600 most popular torrents on the Pirate Bay were used.”

    In other news, a researcher at the University of California has is facing litigation from the combined forces of the creative industries after confessing to downloading copyrighted material without authorisation.

  • redbaron

    I don’t know…Since uTP is on the run I can’t surf at all while downloading torrents. Speed’s about the same.

  • lol mac knobs

    so hows all this run on the ipad.. oh wait..

    IT DOESNT..

    WTF DOES THAT THING DO!

    Seriously mac people are the weirdest people ive met.. im an IT guy.. and ive never met a non-weird mac person.

  • Afficianado

    redbaron:

    I don’t know…Since uTP is on the run I can’t surf at all while downloading torrents. Speed’s about the same.

    Sounds like you didn’t set it up properly.

  • Spenser

    What is with the random Mac bashing?

    @1, Thank you for providing us with your opinion, without explaining why you feel so.

    @4, So using a well designed UI, with minimal crashes, better debug logs, AND a working terminal/cmd teaches ignorance? What makes more sense for listing all files and folders in the CWD… “ls” (list) or “dir” (directory)?

    @8, You obviously don’t meet many mac people. I too am an IT guy. I do server management, helpdesk/techsupport, web development, and application development. I work at a university and run my own business, and very few mac people I meet are eccentric. Sure, there are the hardcore fanboys who can get a little “out there”, but the majority of mac users (especially considering most university/college students are leaning towards macs these days) are quite normal. And one of the faces of the pc/windows world isn’t exactly normal either….
    http://images.google.ca/images?hl=en&source=hp&q=steve+ballmer&btnG=Search+Images&gbv=2&aq=f&oq=

    Back on topic, I would definitely find a more up to date sample handy, however that is quite interesting. Does that mean that more clients are willing to seed to you, if you seed to them? I was under the impression that most clients did not take a share ratio into account.

  • anon

    “Paper is almost a year old, and using an old version of Vuze, v4.2. The latest v4.3 version has been noticeably faster for me, so time for a retest !”

    you sound like a fanboi, dont let your emotions take over, this test was done to better ALL bittorrent development. Besides, the version numbers of the programs used are irrelevant.

  • Anonymous

    @11 That’s like saying which version of a game you’re playing is irrelevant. He’s not being a “fanboi” but just saying that the results no longer hold any value since both clients have been updated a lot since, and newer versions could have already addressed the problems that caused the speed difference.

  • Antony Hopkins

    What I know is that uTorrent should go open source. Right now with all this propaganda I don’t trust it even less than before.

  • Alex

    Not sure why I bother…OF COURSE the version numbers matter…you see, version numbers represent DIFFERENCE…it’s like saying that you ran a speed test with a Ford Model T and you arguing that because it’s a FORD it doesn’t matter that they didn’t use a recent car.

    I switched from Vuze because it went crappy and have much better speeds with UT, but a year old in internet terms might as well be decades.

  • Antony Hopkins

    I meant I trust uTorrent even less than before.

  • anon

    “OF COURSE the version numbers matter”

    let me elaborate, the reason i said the version numbers don’t matter is because when they did the test, just like anyone downloading right now, you are going to have a mix of peers using updated clients, and ones that use older versions, so hence, the version dosent matter, if they did the test again, you would still have people running older versions, and you would still say ,”hey vuze is on version X.X now, retest!”

  • Pingback: UTorrent Outpaces Vuze In BitTorrent Download Speed By 16% | Lifehacker Australia

  • Max

    Sounds like a marketing ploy.

  • GP

    Sounds like a load of BS. You can’t “test” BitTorrent speeds in general. Were these 600 torrents tested on 600 machines sharing the same space on a desk with the same ethernet plug at the same time through arcane application of quantum subspace? If not, the results are bogus.

  • Jeff

    The main thing I would like to see implemented in uTorrent is the ability to see who has been hitting IP filters or was banned for sending bad data too much.

    In the former case, IP blocklists include a lot of innocent ranges, as well as those belonging to MAFIAA/anti-piracy companies, and you cannot tell in uTorrent which IP addresses have been blocked.

    The banning of peers who send bad data is useful most of the time; however, I have gotten one or two low seed torrents off TPB, and banning some users would have made it impossible to complete the torrent. (In one case, the only seeder was someone who was sending bad data. Maybe half of it was discarded, but enough good pieces were sent to make an exception for them.)

  • Hom3r

    No surprise. Anything written in java is generally slow and bloated. uTorrent has a great team, and their whole goal is to make it very small, very fast, and very easy for the user. uTP helps boost speeds, and hopefully other clients will start to use uTP when it’s done.

  • Brrr

    My experience has been the opposite of this study. Vuze is at least 20% faster than uTorrent for me.

  • Ad

    Speeds be damned, back when I was using a USB ADSL modem Azureus/Vuze used to bluescreen my computer all the time (apparently an issue with the Java & the USB modem). Switched to uTorrent & bam, haven’t bluescreened since. Also, it doesn’t slow everything else down.

    Vuze could download twice as fast and I wouldn’t go back to it.

  • T-double-U

    Too bad Utorrent works like SHIT on windows 7…..i have to use vuze now

  • ltr

    rtorrent ftw

  • 3thirty3

    macs are for weirdos.

  • Fierro

    Nothing can beat BitComet when it comes to speed specially if you sign in.

  • Anonymous

    and yet there will always be a dumbass in the comments whining “seeeeeeeeeeeeeeed” …. wish they would learn how to not be dumbasses…

  • Jo Tomas

    uTorrent kicks them all to the back of the bus. Nothing new there.

    Jo
    anon-resources.at.tc

  • n

    and yet there will always be a dumbass in the comments whining “seeeeeeeeeeeeeeed” …. wish they would learn how to not be dumbasses…

  • hmmm

    This test is useless unless they stick to set client versions rather than a spread of builds of both clients. Also they need to factor in the connection speeds of the users isp’s on each client and the latency between peers.

  • Unauthorized Content Consumer

    n00bz use Vuse. l33tz use uTorrent! End of story! xD

  • SquirtFiend

    Is this surprising given the bloatiness of Vuze (and BitVomit)?
    Wasn’t uTorrent always faster?

  • OLD-MAC-DONALD

    MAC people are weird….

  • OLD-MAC-DONALD

    You snooze you vuze

  • evidence

    Marketing ploy? BS? Really? Is it possible to have a statistically significant difference across so many ISPs by random chance alone? I wouldn’t be inclined to believe such a conspiracy theory.

  • Science or just random data comparison?

    There are so many variables here I find it hard to believe they could control enough of them to do any valid scientific analysis. In my opinion I would think that the swarm you connect and your ISP connection would make the biggest differences. I also find it strange that the lines are so similar. It seems they just translated a copy of the the utorrent line down %16 across the board. I would not expect it to be so clear cut.

  • neb

    isophony.gov

    Bullshit////////////

  • us
  • Anonymous

    HP Slate FTW. The iPad can SMD.

  • Anonymous

    “To find out what might be responsible for these speed differences the researchers reverse engineered both BitTorrent clients. ”

    Vuze is open source, they wouldn’t need to reverse engineer it.

  • dannyboy

    i don’t really care what client we use aslong as the internet stays free from the mafiaa/riaa corporate cronies!!

  • Anonymous

    oh YEAAH, glad to know I made the right switch two years ago!

  • GP

    @20: Java is not slow and bloated. Crappily written program are slow and bloated. Azureus was one of those crappy programs in the first few versions. Vuze is not, and hasn’t been. Of course, if you’re still trying to run modern applications on your old Pentium II, it’s your computer that is slow, not the software.

    &40: Ditto. If they “reverse engineered” Vuze, a completely open source application, then they’re obviously stupid, and this “study” should be ignored for the piece of uTorrent-funded marketing FUD it appears to be.

  • Einstein

    Not only faster download speeds, but less memory usage!
    I tried Vuze, an hated it within an hour! It also put a new toolbar in my browser. I mean Vuze torrent client is intrusive!

  • Peter

    “Besides, the version numbers of the programs used are irrelevant” ..
    Really ?
    What this study actually shows is what many have suspected for a long time :
    uTorrent favours uTorrent.

    btw : Why would they “reverse-engineer” Vuze when the source-code is available ?

  • Peter

    Hey Einstein, with that nick one would expect that you had figured out
    never to use default install-option .

  • Pingback: uTorrent Outpaces Vuze in BitTorrent Download Speed by 16% | nothing to see here

  • utorrent is best

    Use utorrent, lightweight and fast!

  • Gargamel

    I have to agree that actually with Java clients like Deluge & Azuerus i do get alot faster downloads but I just cant justify using 89 megs of fukn memory when you utorrent can be running and using only 2 megs.

  • GODFREY BROWNPANTS

    I smell twaddle here. As mentioned above, there are too many variables involved to accurately gauge this. The only way I can see it being done is with an isolated, closed network where all those unknown variables can be monitored.

    Also, what’s with these mongs who go on and on about “memory usage” for vuze etc. These clowns never look twice at memory usage for any program… half of them probably wouldn’t even know where to look. But they heard someone mention it and they just repeat it everytime like they know wtf they are talking about. Memory usage? LMFAO what kind of pos machine are you running that a few MBs of memory here or there matters? It’s your shitty PC that needs sorting not Vuze. Buy some memory and quit whining. You’re talking about an insignificant amount of difference. Throwing that up as some kind of major factor only shows how clueless you are. No surprise they think utorrent is the best then eh? Yeah, figures. It’s always the dumb and ignorant who shout the loudest isn’t it?

    uTorrent is for kids. Dumb it down and keep it simple so the dumbasses can work it. End of.

  • Anonymous

    jeebus. now ern*st0 doesn’t considers Chinese as humans. way to go and talk about human rights and net neutrality.

  • AnarchyNow

    mutorrent = worse than nazi media plot to control people by forcing the use of shitty proprietary software that will end up full of N$A probes…
    And 16%, it may just be the difference between Java shits and old-school C.

  • h00wl

    what is mac?

  • Pingback: [Lifehacker] uTorrent ultrapassa Vuze em velocidade de download de torrents | Notícias de Tecnologia

  • Pingback: P2P Talk! » uTorrent Surpasses Vuze in Download Speed Test

  • MissedMemories

    Just one thing: What about how many connections you can handle, how many peers and all that different set ups? You can’t say utorrent got faster speed in a FAIR way if you don’t make sure everyone have the same set up. EVERYONE..

    Still, good to know utorrent is good :)

  • Pingback: uTorrent downloads torrents 16% faster than Vuze/Azureus « Gus

  • The Speedy Sign Painter

    Arguing’s just a trap
    We should cut eachother slack
    It’s all good days
    Besides anyways
    I use uTorrent on Mac ;)

  • The Secretive Sign Painter

    P.S. But not really.. it’s a Hack1nt0sh!

  • BPI 1 U

    “The Act’s measures to reduce illegal downloading will spur on investment in new music and innovation in legal business models. An internet that rewards taking creative risks will mean more British bands enjoying global success, more choice in how to access music online, and more jobs in our fast-growing creative sector. These measures will not eliminate all piracy, but they will go a long way towards reducing illegal freeloading and will help to build a more sustainable ecosystem for content on the internet. We are acutely aware that music fans are at the heart of our business as it embraces the digital age. Hand-in-hand with the new measures, we will continue to expand the exciting range of legal services that offer vast catalogues of music to stream or download and which reward artists for their work. We will underpin this with industry initiatives, such as the recently launched Music Matters campaign, to raise awareness of these offerings with UK consumers. We will now work diligently with other stakeholders, including ISPs and Ofcom, to develop the Code of Practice that will bring the Act into effect.”

  • spintronics

    Well i haven’t seen vuze being used on the super fast seedboxes like utorrent is, maybe this has an effect on this data, i have used both and prefer utorrent…

  • Anonymous

    uTP = win by uTorrent…
    simple :)

  • Truther

    Still sticking to Vuze.

  • Pingback: uTorrent supera en un 16% la velocidad de descarga de Vuze | Todos Geek

  • utorrent

    boring… Who realy cares? use vuze with slow speed. I use utorrent and get fast speed.

  • Anonymous

    Good god, what is it with product fanboys. Seriously? Whether it is Mac vs. Windows, utorrent vs. Azureus, AMD vs. Intel, or ATI vs. Nvidia; there are always people who become emotional over simple choices. What is so difficult about selecting the best product for yourself at a given time and allowing others to do the same in peace?

    In the case of utorrent and Vuze, there seems to be very little real-world speed difference when both clients are configured properly. I choose to use utorrent because it currently offers every meaningful feature that Vuze does without the overhead. Don’t get me wrong, I was an Azureus user for quite some time. At that point, Azureus was THE client. It had the most features, achieved the best speeds, and was the most accepted by my private trackers. If and when this again becomes the case, I will switch back to Vuze.

  • Pingback: Trik Download Torrent lebih Cepat dengan uTorrent | Intipadi.com

  • 30mm

    Forget client versions, let’s see a comprehensive test of how different ISPs perform.

  • Borderliner

    I might be wrong at this, but didn´t Vuze relay on Java´s TCP/IP stack to do it´s networks stuff? In other words: Vuze can be only as good as the Java implementation it´s running on. And while Sun´s official release might be adequate for most networking situations BT tends to push the limit quite a bit (unspecified amounts of new connections with unspecified lifespan).

  • Pingback: UR-VE.COM » Blog Archive » Estudio: uTorrent es un 16% más rápido que Vuze

  • Pingback: uTorrent sigue siendo el cliente más rápido de BitTorrent

  • lol

    uTorrent FTW!

    Vuze is for noobs, uTorrents is for l33ts…

  • Pingback: Mude já para uTorrent: downloads são 16% mais rápidos | News

  • Pingback: Programma più veloce per scaricare torrent? uTorrent 16% in + su Vuze | RisorseGeek

  • Anonymous

    Pleas halp me share!
    Completed torrents with insufficient share ratios for deletion are piling up in my Deluge client!
    I TRY to share, but for hours on end my upstream just sits there at 0KiB/s and a couple of connected peers at the most!
    I could upstream well above 50KiB/s, if just anybody cared to request packets!
    Funny is: Downloading works just fine!
    Why do I have so much trouble sharing?
    Halp, please!

  • Pingback: » Mude já para uTorrent: downloads são 16% mais rápidos ## Johnatan Oliveira ~~ joww.net – Internet, Tecnologia, Música e Vida Profissional

  • janis

    (…) To find out what might be responsible for these speed differences the researchers reverse engineered both BitTorrent clients.(…) Very good! lets fork uTorrent to OuRTorrent – “O”pen “u” “R”everse engineered “T”orrent!

  • utorrent far the best.

    here is an example of a public tracker download:
    http://e.imagehost.org/0027/2010-03-18_110310.png
    I see no azureus uploading to me.
    I use utorrent 1.8.5 by the way, I find it much better-faster then 2.0.

  • Pingback: uTorrent batte Vuze del 16% nella velocità di download | Poweruser

  • Pingback: BSNL 2mbps 500c plan night unlimited Slow speed - Page 3

  • Steve Jobs

    ? <3

  • Pingback: Qual o melhor Client para torrent? « Parada pro Café

  • Toshio

    Is there any comparison between Azureus, uTorrent and Transmission?

  • Pingback: Download com uTorrent são 16% mais rápidos « Dicas do Julio Jacovenko

  • mith

    My uTorrent speeds were crippled by my router. I don’t know how to port forward properly. Vuze runs pretty well.

  • Pingback: Utorrent better than Vuze(Azureus) | Ricky Martin's Blog

  • Nana

    Wow!! good news!

  • Jere

    I like µTorrent… Lightweight apps are the best.

  • BTGuard - BitTorrent Anonymously

NewsBits

Even more news...

  • 404 Fail: Six Strikes’ Piracy Alternatives Go Missing

    After years of negotiating and planning the “six strikes” copyright alert system finally saw the light...

  • Google Doesn’t Believe Kim Dotcom is Real

    Those who enter Kim Dotcom into Google’s search box will get millions of results. Still, Google...

  • Nintendo’s Miyamoto: Piracy More Concerning Than Used Games Market

    In an interview with Computer and Video Games, Nintendo designer Shigeru Miyamoto says that his company...

  • Monitoring BitTorrent Activity on a Network Using WireShark

    As all readers should know by now, BitTorrent activity is public and can be easily logged...

  • The Pirate Bay Suffers Downtime

    The Pirate Bay is not responding at the moment and most proxies appear to be down...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

PopularArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.