uTorrent Userbase Grows, Vuze takes a Dive
Written by Ernesto on October 18, 2009Fresh data on the market share of BitTorrent clients shows that uTorrent remains the client of choice for over 60% of all BitTorrent users. Vuze is in second place, but its market share has dropped to 14%. Transmission, on the other hand, continues to gain ground, with the client’s market share increasing by 23% in the last two months.
BitTorrent is by far the leading file-sharing technology, with millions of people using the protocol every day. Every two months we take a look at the market share of various BitTorrent clients to see if there are interesting trends emerging.
Today’s report is based on data from over 17,221 unique users in a few dozen public BitTorrent swarms, collected by the Tribler P2P research team at Delft University of Technology.
The results in the table below show the market share for each individual client. In common with our previous reports, only 5 clients reached the 1% threshold, the remaining 14 that were encountered are grouped in the ‘other’ category. Some clients were not identified by libTorrent (rakshasa) and those ended up in the unknown ‘category’.
The changes in market share compared to our September report are also included, and these show some interesting trends. First of all, uTorrent extended its user base and now has a massive 60 percent market share. Vuze, BitComet and BitTorrent’s Mainline client all lost market share.
Transmission, on the other hand, keeps on growing. Its market share increased 23 percent and might take over BitComet’s fourth place soon. More on this in our December report.
| Ranking | Client | Market Share % | Change % | Platform |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| torrentfreak.com | ||||
| 1 | uTorrent | 60.16% | +5.90% | Windows, Mac |
| 2 | Vuze | 14.22% | -21.56% | Windows, Mac, Linux |
| 3 | BitTorrent Mainline | 8.65% | -26.63% | Windows, Mac, Linux |
| 4 | BitComet | 4.43% | -5.95% | Windows |
| 5 | Transmission | 3.65% | +23.73% | Mac, Linux |
| * | Unknown | 7.97% | +89.31% | na. |
| * | Other | 0.92% | -34.29% | na. |
Previously: TV Boss Set To Drop A File-Sharing Bomb On Digital Britain
Next: 70% of British Public Oppose Disconnecting File-Sharers
145 Responses
1st
rtorrent ++
utorrent… always.
Used to use others, but after getting this, never going back.
I use Utorrent all the time, it was recommended by a friend, and has worked fine for me. ATM my torrent files wont download, I think my ISP has done something….
I use uTorrent, Vuze appears to be too bloated.
“Its market share increased to 23 percent” – erm – no it didn’t… It climbed BY 23 percent to 3.65 percent according to your chart!
TF: “to” wasn’t supposed to be there, thanks…
I used to use azureus but when it turned to vuze it bloated my system, stole too much memory, and crashed to many times.
uTorrent is just easier and more stable.
Deluge = uTorrent Linux/GTk style
Transmission FTW
I’ve been using Deluge for a long time, but it looks like Transmission has been getting a lot better recently. It was total crap a year ago.
I’ve been using U-Torrent since 2006. Almost 3 years now.
I used to use Vuze previously, but now it is way too bloated. I have now switched to uTorrent since it does the job and isn’t in the way.
This isn’t surprising. Vuze/Azureus is quite simply too bloated for the job it performs on Windows-based systems.
I switched to uTorrent year ago, and there’s no way (status quo) that I’ll even consider Vuze.
I’m a big rTorrent fan. It works well on a headless box and means I can dump torrent files in a folder and it’ll get going. Then when complete add the files to another folder. It means I can script most of my downloading and file management/organisation.
Deluge or Utorrent. Everything else sucks.
Vuze is a massive resource hog
I think the change percentage should be in absolute terms, not actual change of the percentage value itself.
It would help us understand more where market share was transferred.
I use uTorrent because it is so incredibly lightweight, size and resource wise.
uTorrent on Windows
Transmission on Mac and Linux.
uTorrent works just great on Linux too if you want the same client across all platforms. Just use Wine.
@19
Agreed, alot of linux users run utorrent using wine.
Vuze kicks uTorrent’s ass and will forever continue to do so.
uTorrent isn’t opensource but Vuze is such a huge fiasco… I prefer Transmission (Simple. Free. Open.) ;-)
@21
Kicks its ass in being bloated?
I used to use uTorrent, but there was one point where it just wasn’t working for me – I don’t know if it was a glitch, something about my system at the time, a fluke, or what – I switched over to Azureus, and stuck with it through Vuze, and I’m still okay with that. If Vuze starts messing up, uTorrent will be first on my list of replacements, but for the time being, no complaints, oddly enough.
hardcore torrenters use deluge, not better but quite more hype than ut
I’ve tried Transmission, but I really, vastly prefer Deluge when using Linux.
I use uTorrent on linux.
uTorrent all the way
Go Utorrent.. Every1 check out the utorrent 2.0 beta.. Pretty stable now.. Use it!.. bt.transp.disp = 255 | Forced encryption | Install IPV6 | ..
Transmission daemon on a small linux box, I love it. If you want it even more “boxed”:
http://www.freenas.org/
No surprise, Azureus (alright, Vuze or whatever they want to call it) is a resource hog. Used to swear by it until I got sick of it slowing my computer down to a crawl all the time – switched to uTorrent & won’t ever go back.
I have to laugh at all the Azureus haters!
Bloated… resource hog… LOL
Nevermind that all the resource management is done by Sun’s sh!tty Java Runtime Environment.
I was a satisfied Azureus user (that’s the name of the core), but on 7 x64 the damn JRE was to messy. In 4 to 5 hours it would eat up all the free RAM, that would be 1.3 GB without any way of recovering it. Not once did that happen on XP! And other java apps like jDownloader suffer form this as well.
About Az being bloated… no! It has a pretty well designed plugin system, a lot of them can be disabled or removed. And the interface set in classic mode is pretty simple to operate. It rarely crashed; like 10 times in 3 years of torrenting.
But sadly… java is getting worse and worse by the day. Good thing uTorrent is well done.
So FTW uTorrent!
And wow for BitComet!… that means 4.43% of torrenters are suckers!
rtorrent ftw
I’m not really surprised- the vast majority of people new to torrenting have probably only heard of uTorrent. I know I heard of uTorrent long before I ever knew about Vuze or any other BitTorrent client. And now that I do know about other clients, well, uTorrent works fine for me, so I’ve got no real reason to switch.
utorrent is proprietary software. Only its programmers know what else it does while it runs. Better to retain control of your computer and use a free software Bittorrent client so you can benefit from software freedom to inspect the program’s complete source code or let the community do that for you.
perl-script catching new releases using a regex-filter from the announcebot on irc -> rtorrent -> unrar-script extracting into dated folders -> profit.
azureus and xp through a vpn ,, quad core ;)
Azuerus used to be the best but i think people like utorrent now because it uses very little ram. Plus Vuse sucks nowadays, i liked Azuerus version 2 but that’s long gone. It was good because you could block leechers :D
Btw im running it on a 1.4ghz 256mb ram pc so i need something that wont lagg it up.
Can I hear an “amen” for ktorrent?? Anyone…? I’m a big fan…
What is Reasoned Mind using then?
@40 He works for the MPAA. Ask them.
I miss the old Azureus… It was 1000 times better than Vuze. The only thing I like about Vuze now is… well… the fact that I already know how to run it to it’s full potential. I’ve been meaning to find a new client ever since Vuze came out, but I’m just to lazy…
A little idea off topic:
You should start posting the IP addresses and any other info you can acquire of the fags that comment with “1st.” Or at least put “Fag” or another degrading comment next to their name… It’s f*cking annoying…
Anything + Java = bloatware
i say down with utorrent… lets get something good enough to compete against utorrent! i see complications in the future if we keep using utorrent…. somebody get something awesome out there so we can drop utorrent and go for a better open source alternative…
Azereus -> BitComet -> uTorrent
utorrent will surely grow more. Vuze is now useless because of its un-needed additions. Transmission will also grow as its now being largely used in Bittorrent Hardwares.
http://Pirlog.com
@42 You can still run any version of AZ that you want http://www.oldversion.com/Azureus.html
Also, ROFL!!
A little idea off topic:
You should start posting the IP addresses and any other info you can acquire of the fags that comment with “1st.” Or at least put “Fag” or another degrading comment next to their name… It’s f*cking annoying…
My thoughts *Exactly*
Btw, Azureus All the F-king way!…
Utorrent is fine, but the frog kiks ass, always has, and even with the Vusee version you dont havve to run the Vuze UI, I dont, (of course I dont run the current version either LoL)
I have nothing bad to say about Utorrent, I havve used it and its fine, I just Prefer AZ…
OMG dude, no way that is just totally insane dude.
RT
http://www.anonymous.ua.tc
Yes!! I love uTorrent for stealing copyrighted files! (there…that should incense reasoned tard)
Vuze is fail, end of discussion. uTorrent on Windows, rTorrent on OSX/Linux.
I used to use utorrent and azureus at the same time. utorrent to download and azureus to seed. Stopped useing utorrent when I coudn’t manualy update the tracker. Now a hacked version of vuze is all I need. I use the classic UI and love it. Vuze FTW!
God bless P2P, apple pie, and harmoniums.
“a few dozen public bittorrent swarms”?
Come on, that sample size is way too low. Do a couple hundred at the very least, pick the most popular torrents from isohunt or something. This doesn’t measure anything.
uTorrent, and Deluge only plz
What strikes me is transmission being even in the list.
I like Transmission even tough I use Deluge but I’m well aware of the Linux market penetration and it is not that high and it to command that much market share already is very impressive. Well at least to me.
So either those are very localized numbers or Linux has seen some very rapidly growth in the market.
I used to use azureus, then vuze, but for a while it broke and was way too clunky so I started using transmission on the mac side and utorrent on the PC side and have never looked back.
utorrent for a fast small client with ALL the extras.
vuze is good but its too large for my taste..
only 17000 users? out of millions?
uTorrent = epic win.
I use myteev.com
vuze did it to themselves
I started using Transmission mainly because it’s default in Ubuntu. I now have the latest Transmission for my Ubuntu 8.04 (from the PPA in launchpad) and it performs extremely well.
Transmission has definately improved over the last year and a half. Recommended.
I used to use Azureus, it was great, then it merged with Vuze and turned into crap, no I just use utorrent.
I personally liked the plug in system of Vuze but switched to Utorrent at the end of my torrenting days… Haven’t used anything for a while now… DDL ftw.
uTorrent is the best client around, even on Linux where it has to run via WINE.
utorrent 2.0 has WINE support I think..
transmission – runs on linux
I dont use peer to peer because its stealing… *downloads stuff when no one is looking*
Utorrent on windows.
rtorrent or deluge on linux.
I don’t use VUZE, but I think its the only bittorrent app supporting SSL trackers.
http://azureus.sourceforge.net/faq.php#19
By the way, the EULA of Vuze contradicts the GNU GPL. Is it still an open source/free software project?
utorrent is good then you need dload something somewhere.
but if you need some control about your downloads/seeds use Azureus/Vuze.
And to shitheads crying for ”bloatness” – did you bother to find what Vuze is VERY simply turns back to Azureus 2.4.xx style?
utorrent of course ROCKS!
mpaa get real!
anybody can download from piratebay rightnow?I can get in , search and see torrents but download button don’t works
Nice stats i think the increase of uTorrent comes from the increase of users not from a shift of trend.
Its obvious why uTorrent is the best for the newbies between the torrenters as i recommend it to anyone new to the torrenting business.
I use uTorrent if i want to get something quick on someone’s machine.Then i set it up for ease of use for them.
At home i can not live without Vuze since the upgrade from Azureus it runs for me about 300% faster then before and i get the critical 100 options i need to fully customize ratio keeping on several trackers. When you have 500+ torrents running at one time seeding on several trackers its impossible to keep track on spreading your UL automatically to where you need it.Then custom RSS feeds with Regular Expression filters and being able to save files in side the torrent in different locations to suit your archiving schema.
What these stats reflect to me is that a lot of new people joined the P2P community hence uTorrent is the best choice. When they go pro they’ll switch to Vuze if they are on Windows also Vuze is not bloated for the Pro only for the newbies who i cannot blame for that claim for them its like rocket science.
Happy to see uTorrent is before Vuze. Vuze offers better control but needs way too much power to run (not to mention the existance of a COMMERCIAL portable version :X ).
For Linux Transmission and Deluge (almost the same as uTorrent but for Linux) are the best.
Another Azureus->uTorrent switcher. Wish I would have done it earlier.
utorrent for 3 years now…im never paying for anything again!
I started using vuze since august I like the vuze HD network alot I used utorrent before switching over but im not really happy with it.
uTorrent rocks!
Utorrent users careful now…http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BitTorrent,_Inc.
They own Utorrent who own you.Open software is a must in this game.Old info but good info…Azureus 2.5.0.4
I’ve been using Azureus/Vuze for a long time. I like it because it is extremely flexible. There’s tons of settings you can tweak to make sure it does exactly what you need. Moreso than any other gui client I’m aware of. For the rest, there’s a ton of plugins.
I don’t notice any large memory or cpu consumption as others seem to experience. Did you ever try to disable plugins you don’t need?
@74
A little condescending, don’t you think? I’ve been using utorrent for more than 4 years, so I’m not a new user, and have no plans to switch.
I have given azureus (and vuze) a shot on a couple of occasions and it only took me a couple of hours to delete it and run back to utorrent.
i love vuze i’ve never had it crash, never had it eat memory or lag me up. maybe it has something to do with my computer:
8 gigs ram
quad core 64bit AMD cpu
2X512 vid cards
1000watt psu
windows vista 64bit
and the built in “anti throttling” software in vuze is genuinely consistent. I always download faster than my brother (he uses micro torrent) on the same internet connection.
PLUS i love the built in conversion software for my xbox 360 and ipods.
oh i forgot to mention RSS feeds and built in search function. I NEVER have to go on a torrent site… EVER. Everything i want to download comes to me!
I wish there was an I2P port.
I wish uTorrent had I2P functionality built into it.
utorrent sucks, it’s windoze-only, close-source and it’s gonna be the end for bittorrent
Indeed.
A lot of people do defer to Utorrent because it’s C++ not system hungry Java machines.
But! I’ve only got a 1.2Mbit wire connection so tend to down at a max 140 and average top of 122kbps.
I find the throttle features on Azureus/Vuse help me balance up/down rates, limiting up to 15kbps while downloading helps keep available swarm speed max’d out.
But above all, Azureus has *Kick & Ban* ability not present in Utorrent.
This is handy because i find download manager hybrids, Flashget etc, compromise my speeds, Utorrent beta, Transmission and many others also seem to cluster and kill my download speed, i kick them and my speeds return, i keep to mainly Utorrent and Azureus connecting, i get full available speeds, i let others connect and my downloads get killed, more often than not.
Not all BT clients do it and among those that do not all those are aggressive, i’ve studied these buggers in Azureus a long time now and it’s how users configure their browsers and default settings etc, so the ability to occasionally disable-enable the IP filter to allow all connections again is handy because as i kick and ban to get my speeds decent some clients will not actually be aggressive but in the cluster i boot off.
So, yes, Utorrent is a decent client but i know a lot of users get strangled as well with aggressive clients connecting and i have minimal speeds so Azureus is the only client which makes sense on the aforementioned level.
but man, Utorrent will never cut it for functionality, UI and configurabity in my humble opinion.
BT client developers should focus on keeping a standard in BT FTP tech’ not introduce aggressive elements to make it seem their client has an edge over competitors, they haven’t only settings by default or there as configurable for users to purposefully ramp up over other connecting clients in swarms, as per Bit Comet, one of the first to do that and why every private tracker bans it, same as the others, it’s ruddy annoying.
Azureus is superior in such an aggressive swarm climate!
Peace!
PaxDeltaPan.
Enlightened Evolution.
Tempered From The Chaotic Forge Of Life.
Client came out as browser in the middle there, i meamnt cleint obviously.
“i’ve studied these buggers in Azureus a long time now and it’s how users configure their browsers and default settings etc”
Dunno where that came from, doh.
PaxDeltaPan.
Enlightened Evolution.
Tempered From The Chaotic Forge Of Life.
KTorrent FTW! :P
Used Both and found Utorrent to be the one for me..
Use the older version of Vuze called Azureus. then update the azureus code and it won’t be so bloated. I also use utorrent as well.
KTorrent on ubuntu \m/
I use ABC am I oldskool?
System requirements for Vuze: 2 Gigahertz processor, 1 GB of RAM and DirectX 9.0 compliant video and sound — WHY the hell do you require 1 GB of RAM for a BitTorrent client? I’ll keep slim sexy uTorrent, thank you.
Vuze/Azureus is a resource eating behemoth. If Vuze team solve that problem it’ll come back to the top.
I’ve been using uTorrent since it was born. It has greatly evolved and it is now the best software in the category. As for not being open source… Well, as long as the team does a good job keeping it up to date it’s cool. The negative point is that uTorrent stable version still doesn’t support udp… But it’s gonna change soon ;D
I used to use Transmission and uTorrent, but then found out about VUZE’s ability to transfer to my PS3. I started using it just to test out that function and found out that it also downloaded my torrents at a MUCH faster speed. Like X5 faster than uTorrent or Transmission. Not sure why. So until someone can point me to a solution to have uTorrent or Transmission download as fast as Vuze, or to a program that transfers to my PS3 in the same simple way Vuze does, then I’m using Vuze.
Willing to change though – so help and convince me!
Oh, Vuze also has RC4 encryption.
Funnily enough I’ve actually gone from uTorrent to Vuze. But I can see why its not doing as well – Vuze isn’t exactly as lightweight or well-coded as uTorrent.
I used to be a fan of Vuze when it was still called Azureus, but ever since they renamed it and redid the interface completely i started to dislike it – mainly a last drop though as it was simply to much of a resource hog.
Utorrent does exactly the same – at least on the surface – and is a nice, slim application. Im not surprised about the market share it has :)
I use BitTornado (via TorrentFlux) on a small separate Linux machine that runs 24/7.
Do some of you folks realise you can switch from Vuze’s crap interface back to the old one as seen in Azureus?
Look here…
http://azureuswiki.com/index.php/The_Azureus_Experience
I really wonder about people’s computing abilities these days…
This helps with Vuse/Azureus resources.
http://www.mininova.org/tor/2753091
Can’t find version 3 by the Black Knight, prefer that myself but that version 4 retail of Mem Turbo is fine, just code is better and different UI, smaller filesize.
I autoreclaim every 30 mminutes, set autorecover to alert level and when needed run from system tray etc, then RAM can be refreshed without reboot.
I’ve still only got 512 and using browser with Azureus simultaneously wouldn’t be possible without Mem Turbo, prerequisite software imho.
Paxus.
PaxDeltaPan.
Or should i say multitasking Azureus and browser etc would be annoyingly clunky, not impossible, much better with Mem Turbo, other can’t qualify other RAM managers.
Indeed, goto tools menu, options, Interface sub level “Start” and about midway down is the UI chooser for classic interface, first thing i do if i need to reinstall.
Paxus.
PaxDeltaPan
I think its an extremely bad idea to use closed-source software for torrenting because it it a sensitive matter.
Therefore i wouldn’t use uTorrent or other closed-source client.
Vuze(classis interace ONLY), deluge, trasmission, ktorrent all do the job for me.
uTorrent in WINE for the win. Been my staple for years.
Does using Transmission make you feel more l33t?
Personally, I am still using Kazaa. MPAA say there are quite a few of you pirates still stealing our stuff on there.
If you want to be slick use utorrent, but if you want to be hardcore use azureus. Azureus till i die!!!
Halite
http://www.binarynotions.com/halite-bittorrent-client
the person for comment #21 should go ta hell since utorrent is jus too amazing =], NEVER had a problem
Quite frankly the TF report feels sensationalistic, as all these “metrics” are based on a sample size of just 17k peers, which is a tiny tiny fraction of the *millions* connected at any given moment, and a size so small that a single torrent can significantly skew the results. I would argue that the tribler folks need to massively increase their sample size before anyone can argue true statistical significance, and particularly before one can make any real conclusions about market share gain/loss over time:
10361 uTorrent
2449 Azureus
I’ve seen more peers on a single Lost torrent alone, than in their entire sampling! A 2% change is only a couple hundred peers in this tiny sample, a laughably small number, particularly when you realize that just a single torrent’s peers could skew all of these in the complete opposite direction.
Let me know when somebody posts some real numbers, say from a real-world tracker’s point of view, like opentracker, which should have millions of swarm peers to pull metrics from. Given the massive variation in peer types from torrent to torrent that I’ve seen, you’d need a sampling of hundreds of thousands of peers, across hundreds of torrent files, before I would make any conclusions.
Transmission if f@#$$% awsome:D
Trasmission is fast on linux :D!
@70
The EULA is for the Vuze Platform (the HD Network). The client is still GPL.
So, yes, the client is still an open source/free software project
I use Transmission on Ubuntu, however, the version on Intrepid Ibex (8.10) was not great so I suggest you go to the page such as here:
http://forum.transmissionbt.com/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=5604
To configure the package manager to get the most recent version.
In 8.10 that fixed a menu bug and added the up/down speed limits and block list features. The speed limit is particularly good for those suffering the “fair usage” policy limits during day time.
What did you expect – in a world where half the clients have spyware built in, utorrent is lean and spyware clean!
I am using rtorrent and/or transmission.
I never danced (java) with Azuerus.
I let down utorrent from 1.6 onward, mmmm I wonder why?
Don’t trust BitTorrent Inc to do good. Don’t trust Vuze Inc to deliver un-bloated software. Don’t have Linux.
I use uTorrent on Ubuntu Linux purely for the peer exchange. Most ppl use it, therefore uTorrent’s peer exchange has more peers than any other client. Unless some client can use uTorrent’s peer exchange, I don’t see them really losing ground anytime soon…
This is how I learned to set up uTorrent on Ubuntu Linux:
http://linuxhacksandports.blogspot.com/2009/10/torrent-on-linux.html
utorrent is the exact same thing as bittorent
@120 The latest Transmission BT client supports both peer exchange and DHT for “trackerless” operation.
why don’t you suckers use my program?
@ Brandon
Most likely TF counts also versions earlier than 6 (or was it 5?) of Mainline which was not the same program as uT. And eighter way – they´re marketed as different programs, hence they can be counted as different programs.
As for Transmission, it´s a decent client without big hickups which is, among other things, included in FreeNAS, I bet that´s why it´s getting more and more popular. Especially as Windows users can command it with the 3rd party Remote GUI which looks and works like uT.
you can call me dumb, I know you will, but I use BitComet and I like it.
I have both bitcomet and utorrent installed but i always use bitcomet, I have 2gb ram so i dont need a light client, I think bitcomet is very easy to use and has also a very good interface, never had problem with it.
I’ve tried them all…………..uTorrent downloads the fastest!
Be well all……..
MD 20/20
For those of you wondering why transmission has increasing numbers:
It probably has to do with the increasing market share of Apple, not Linux. I tried az on my mac but it was way to resource intensive. Transmission on the other hand hardly uses any cpu or that much memory. I never notice a slowdown in performance at all. Plus its easy to use and has intuitive controls. Best client for mac imho. And with Apple continuing to increase its market share, its not wonder transmission is on the rise.
Eh, screw all this.
Just buy plastic discs!
I’m liking that I’m seeing alot of push for Deluge on here. I was annoyed at transmission cause I felt like I had been crippled by trying to use it instead of uTorrent, because I felt like much information and options were missing-and they were. I was very happy when I found deluge, because like the person who said he uses rTorrent so that he can add files and have it handle the rest – deluge can do that too when you switch it to daemon mode. Then you can also connect to that daemon from any other computers in the house and it looks like you’re doing stuff on that local computer and feels just like uTorrent still (although the pieces tab is missing…) which I think is very cool.
rtorrent here, running 24/7/365 on openbsd-powered headless routers.
Of course uTorrent is more popular: Dumb is the majority. When GI Joe is 5th in the list of top ten downloads you KNOW that thinking just isn’t an option for many people.
uTorrent is for the clueless.
Note that Mainline is µTorrent with a different name and BitTorrent DNA preinstalled so it’s actually 68.81% for µTorrent/Mainline. That’s a lot!
looks like I gotta switch from vuze to uTorrent
After reading this article I tried out Transmission in the new Ubuntu beta. It’s way better than it was a year ago when I last tried it. So much so that I think I’ve found my new BitTorrent client.
I agree with the idea that Transmission is gaining ground because of Mac. I used uTorrent on Windows but when I bought my Macbook they didn’t have uTorrent for it yet. Now that I’m using Transmission I doubt I’ll switch to the Mac uTorrent.
who this is brand new! look at:
http://api.theghostbay.org/
For Linux, I prefer Deluge.
Windows, uTorrent or Vuze.
Also, don’t forget that Transmission is the default client for many Linux distros. That could also be the reason for why the client is gaining ground.
Deluge is the best
I don’t even have to use a client program. 100% of your connection speed downloads, well known and trusted service. Check it out at downloadtorrentsfaster.net
I HATE utorrent for the main fact that I can’t manually update the tracker. That’s where they fucked up for me.
A closed source application becoming a majority use application.
Now where have I heard that before?
And what was it that came before a major wave of exploits and infestation?
Oh yea, the exact same thing.
The only reason I use uTorrent is because the scheduling on the others sucks ass, and Vuze uses Java, with is a hog.
I’m here researching a change in my bittorent client, as the new Vuse ‘upgrade’ has been a disaster. It didnt install correctly, left all my torrents high and dry, I’m ready to delete the damn think and find something else after many years of loyalty to azareus.. actually I would love to go back to simple old azareus..
how much money microsoft gave you to condamn java??? hahaha….java run on kbts somethang microsoft did not done since dos.oh…did i mention no bsod…the wow was never needed.
give me java and i will emulate the world.
6 references to this post
Responses are closed
All remaining responses will continue to be archived. Use the TorrentFreak forums if you want to discuss something.