TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

Anti-Piracy Outfits Think Megaupload, Demonoid & BTjunkie Are Still Alive

Almost nine months on from the raids that took down Megaupload and bizarrely some of the world’s biggest record labels still think that the site is hosting infringing content. In a clear sign that anti-piracy companies aren’t bothering to carry out even the most rudimentary checks before they send DMCA notices, Google is receiving daily takedown demands not only for Megaupload, but also Demonoid, BTjunkie, and other dead file-sharing services.

During the past few years the world’s largest entertainment companies have regularly complained that Google isn’t doing enough to reduce accessibility of infringing content via its search service.

In recent months Google has made a few overtures, such as doctoring its auto-complete feature to take out terms that could potentially direct users to infringing content. More recently the search giant changed its algorithm to push allegedly infringing sites down its rankings.

But while all this is going on Google is being bombarded with requests from rightsholders to remove links from its search that point to allegedly infringing material hosted on other sites. The task has grown massively to the point where the company now produces its Transparency Report to show who asks for what content to be taken down.

During the last few days we’ve been taking a look at the report from a new angle and have discovered that some of the world’s largest record labels and anti-piracy companies are not bothering to check if takedown notices they are sending are valid. Indeed, we have discovered dozens of takedown reports being sent demanding the removal of links to content that simply doesn’t exist.

Unless you’ve been living on Mars during 2012 you’ll know that in January this year Megaupload was taken down by U.S. authorities. In the space of a few hours the entire site was completely wiped out and the news made dozens of headlines that continue to break to this day.

But while seemingly everyone knows that Megaupload no longer exists, the likes of IFPI, BPI, Sony, Warner, Universal, EMI, The Publisher’s Association, Microsoft, and adult company Vivid (to name a few) are absolutely oblivious. To this very day these companies are sending takedown demands to Google ordering the company to remove links to content on Megaupload.com that hasn’t existed, at the least, for almost nine months.


Latest Megaupload takedown requests (see)

null

And what about Demonoid, the semi-private BitTorrent tracker that went down in a cloud of smoke and controversy during the first week of August? Well, according to EMI, the BPI, Microsoft and several other anti-piracy companies, the site is alive and well. Takedown requests are being filed with Google by companies such as these on a daily basis, all for content that isn’t online.


Latest Demonoid takedown requests (see)

null

Unbelievably the same holds for BTjunkie, the BitTorrent indexing site that closed its doors in February this year. Ever since the major record labels and anti-piracy companies have been ordering Google to remove links to a completely dead site.

Sadly it doesn’t end there. In the first days of August the Oron cyberlocker disappeared after their legal fight with adult studio Liberty Media. But apparently The Publishers Association, the BPI, Universal, Sony, EMI – the list goes on and on – didn’t notice. Right up until today all of these companies have been ordering Google to take down links to content that doesn’t exist.

While it would be unfair to complain too much about the takedown requests still being sent for the now-defunct FileSonic (it’s only been down for just over a week), sending DMCA takedowns for content on Megaupload nine months after its demise is just ridiculous.

What this shows is that anti-piracy companies aren’t even bothering to check content anymore – they’re simply searching Google, firing off notices without a second thought, and then expecting the search giant to clean up the mess.

Related Posts

Previous Post | Next Post

  • Iphone

    1st

    • OccamsKatana

       Yay you……..

      • http://twitter.com/AliceBartell Alice Bartell

        DCMA law should have written in statutory penalties for filing invalid takedowns. Solve this problem very simply...knightDeal.blogspot.com

        • FrostyC

          FUCK YOUR SPAM LINK! DIE. Alice Bartell is a piece of shit.

      • Laika

        they are trying to cover up the dead maybe?

        • Alanmclelland

           or they are trying to bog down google so they simply cave to their demands to save time/money

        • Kyrin67

           Or they are simply no different than the same fat-cats that took down wall-street. They made their money but want it all and have golden parachutes if things do not go as intended.  Enough with corporate greed and tax break wealth!  When is the little guy going to be able to look into their records without expressed consent? When is the government going to protect the average person and not just wealthy corporations who can further some crooked politicians goal by tossing money around????

    • Anon

      You’re the 1st one to suck cock you mean Iphone ……or is it iFag ?

      • non

        iFag, iShit, iBitch all those dumbasses are the same. 

        • Anonymous

          This comment was flagged for review.

          click here to view anyway

        • d_e_n_n_i_s

           Why is it flagged when 25 people liked it?

        • BJonesTF

          it was a fake message….

  • OccamsKatana

    Couldn’t they be hit with filing false DMCA requests?

    • http://profiles.google.com/zerianis10 Christopher Kidwell

      Yes, but let’s be real here: it’s very seldom that, even though these notices are filed under penalty of perjury, that a prosecutor is going to take this to court.

      • OccamsKatana

        I know where you’re coming from , but don’t you think Google has the wherewithal to make it happen, should they choose to? Or at least step up to the plate and demand changes to the way DMCA requests are filed.

        • meowmix

          you’d think due dilligance would come into it. if they cannot do the legwork to check it is there, they’re wasting thiers and everyone elses time and should be fined for doing so.

        • http://profiles.google.com/zerianis10 Christopher Kidwell

          No, I don’t think that Google has the time nor energy to press this when they can just say “Hey, these sites aren’t even up anymore!” and send the things back to the companies.

        • Guest321

          All Google needs to do is demand $20 per DMCA notice served and the number of notices they get will go down to 0 immediately. It happened it NZ. MAFIAA will never pay anyone to do something but expect everyone to do their legwork for free.

        • Kyrin67

           It not googles job to police the net, regardless of what other companies get their feelings hurt. They should be able an free to unbiasedly search the internet for what ever anyone wants to look for! 

      • Anonymous

        ‘ it’s very seldom that….a prosecutor is going to take this to court’

        if it were anyone other than the entertainment industries they would!

      • OccamsKatana

        No, I don’t think that Google has the time nor energy to press this when
        they can just say “Hey, these sites aren’t even up anymore!” and send
        the things back to the companies.

        I think they do. Google is like the sleeping giant. They have the funds and the legal team at their disposal should they decide to lock horns. Kick them in the shins enough and I’m sure they’ll wake up. I’m no friend of Google, but if anyone has the ability, THEY do! Personally, I think it would be kinda nice if they did. Teach the MAFIAA to pick on someone their own size. (or bigger!) 

        • OccamsKatana

           @c466900e9ef956f0dae9cdf09de60af1:disqus   They should be slapped with RICO. Ya think they aren’t corrupt?? Why aren’t they investigated for RICO????

          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racketeer_Influenced_and_Corrupt_Organizations_Act

        • Decimus

          I agree, I think that they could change up their forms to ensure that these companies aren’t using software to submit reports, they could do an automatic check on the host site to see if it’s up, or they could just start charging for abuse of the report system.

        • Kyrin67

           That is like saying I have the ability to go and feed my neighbors dog when it is running around the hood with no supervision. But fundamentally is that my duty, job or requirement to do so?

      • Kyrin67

         And if you as a person files a false law suite or perjured request.  What do you think would happen? Your rear is in jail or fined substantially.

    • Anonymous

      considering they were the instigators in getting these (ALL!) sites shut down in the first place, what excuse could they have for continuing to file DMCA notices?

      • Anyone

        they haven’t updated their bots

        • Anonymous

           that’s not bad then. Mega has only been down for over 8 months, so i suppose they haven’t had time? truth is, they dont give a toss for anything, including the law, as they think they are the law (and also above the law) and can do what they want when they want to who they want!

      • meowmix

        i seem to recal spamming is a crime in the us. i may be wrong, i don’t think i am.

    • zkank

      This will be good ammo for a defense lawyer in any future civil suit involving them.
      Incompetence and mindless maliciousness.

    • guess

       don’t know what the equiv version in the states is of the information commissioners office/data protection agency etc, but sometimes all it takes is 1 complaint :)

      you just got to find the right department/organization within the federal government that does :)

  • Chuck

    That’s because they are lame!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Christopher-Staniforth/100001170525332 Christopher Staniforth

    crikey iphone your day is complete

  • Guest

    Google should send the DMCA requesters a bill for x amount of dollars for each dead link that is removed to cover the wasted time. This clearly shows the abuse of the DMCA system.

    • me

      We all know where this is leading: the MAFIAA will buy a new law that prohibits Google & Co. to ask for money processing the DMCA notices. And of course, Congress will bow to the will of the Almighty Copyright Taliban, as they always do.

    • someone else

      A ‘correction fee’ for every false DMCA takedown request would seem reasonable to me. Also, refuse to process any more requests from submitter of those bad takedowns until all correction fees have been paid in full. 

      I know, they aren’t going to do it, but wouldn’t it be great?

  • MadAsASnake

    DCMA law should have written in statutory penalties for filing invalid takedowns. Solve this problem very simply.

  • Common Sense

    Massive amounts of DMCA requests + requests to Google about dead SITES (not just links) = convincing evidence of robo-requests.  Wasn’t there a prediction that giving the RIAA and MPAA the tools to file them would just result in abuse?

    • Guest

      It’s not just evidence of robo-requests, it’s evidence that the RIAA and MPAA are so fucking lazy and inept that they can’t even update their DMCA-bots to ignore dead URLs.

    • Guest321

      Of course these are all robo-requests. The MPAA and RIAA have less than 100 employees. They don’t have the manpower to search the whole web for links and manually file DMCA reports. All this is happening because there is zero penalty for abusing the DMCA. This needs to change immediately.

    • MPAA

       Who are you? I’ve never heard of you.

  • thedude321

    These idiots really need to do something useful with their lives.

    • meowmix

      foad comes to mind.

  • Guest

    Isn’t there supposed to be some penalty for sending bullshit DMCA takedowns? Oh that’s right, I forgot. The rightsholders are rich, so the law doesn’t apply to them. 

    I doubt they will because they’re pussies, but I wish Google would start charging these fuckers a processing fee. Of $100 per request. 

    • Vincent Giannell

       He can’t because doing so would get him in trouble with the rightholders and they don’t take kindly to processing feeds.

    • Guest

      Well we can’t have that now can we, after all, they are losing :SUBSTANTIALLY HUGE” amount of money already, any further and they could face bankruptcy. :O

  • Ikari930

    yea charge them 100$ an hour +sales tax to process the request personally then send gift cards for 90$ to all g+ users that register. rinse and repeat lol
    economy that.

  • ForestSilverwood

    Charging at least 1 penny would at least force them to limit the requests to some degree. 

  • ken147

    Still Alive you say…. *que Portal credits song*

  • Just Curious

    Wow..(jaw dropping) Torrent Freak has given us some news! (sarcasm)

    Sarcasm is “a sharp, bitter, or cutting expression or remark; a bitter jibe or taunt”,[1] usually conveyed through irony or understatement.[2] Most authorities distinguish sarcasm from irony;[3] however, others argue that sarcasm may or often does involve irony[4] or employs ambivalence.[5]

    Contents

     

    • http://www.facebook.com/doctorvad.gers DoctorVad Gers

       sarcasm is also the lowest form of wit…..

  • Anyone

    all this means is that DMCA takedowns need to have a cost associated with them
    otherwise the MAFIAA will not stop flooding everyone with bogus takedowns

  • anon

    Epic Fail, lol 

  • Brent Forbes

    This is what Google should have done:
    I am Google, I search the entire internet for you’re convince. I am  going to ignore all your take-down notices because all I’m doing is showing you what you are trying to find, I do not discriminate, I’m bigger than you will ever be.
    COME AT ME BRO

    • johnny 5

       best comment ever

  • Guest

    Maybe because the DMCA requests are made by robots who can’t understand that those websites are offline.

    • MadAsASnake

      Unfortunately, these idiots will use the false takedowns (and lack of challenge) as evidence of massive criminality… 

  • Anonymous

    surely this shows that the majority of all entertainment industry take down notices are done without any sort of checks at all, including whether the files are theirs in the first place and whether they are infringing anyway! they have become so used to just chucking out DMCA and infringement notices, they think that everything on the planet belongs to them. what a shame the politicians with the power to stop this from happening are so wrapped up in lining their own pockets at the expense of the people that they allow these arse holes to get away with what they are doing

    • Anyone

      it’s most likely just some bots crawling the net and sending takedowns
      the point is to annoy sites that actually comply with the takedowns so much that they eventually cave in and install your content filters

      it’s a new form of DDoS

      • Anonymous

        ‘it’s most likely just some bots crawling the net and sending takedowns’

        so why dont they stop doing it or why are they not stopped from doing it by the authorities?

         ’it’s a new form of DDoS’

        which is illegal and whoever is doing it should be prosecuted

        • Anyone

          “so why dont they stop doing it or why are they not stopped from doing it by the authorities?”

          because the law was dictated by the MAFIAA, technically what they are doing is perfectly legal, and there are no penalties for writing millions of bogus takedowns just to waste time and money of a site that has to deal with the takedowns (if they are in the US, at least)

          they are just now waking up to what a great extortion tool this is, “install our filter or we will flood you with takedowns that will ruin you”

        • MadAsASnake

           Another answer – I think any company would be justified in rejecting DMCA notices from any organization that files more than, say, 5% false requests.

        • Guest321

          Why 5%? Even a single false DMCA notice should not be accepted. A company sending even one false DMCA notice should be immediately put in the blocklist. 

          A rightsholder is supposed to verify all claims of copyright before sending a DMCA notice and the proof of ownership or copyright should also be sent with the notice. You can’t just write, “hey this content is mine, please take it down” and expect Google & other webmasters to comply. But unfortunately the current system is working just like that.

  • Pingback: Anti-Piracy Outfits Think Megaupload, Demonoid & BTjunkie Are Still Alive

  • Just Curious

    Learn how to speeek English then someone might take you seriously.  

    • http://twitter.com/Mathew30 Mathew Lisett

       coming from the person who says “speeeek” . and when somebody types/writes, they do not “speak” they write.

  • Camosb

    Why the fuck do those antipiracy companies complain to google, te sites are down since long ago and they are still bitching about link that lead you nowhere. This is just bullshit

    • Spencer greff

      It goes to show the industry doesn’t understand the internet. They think Google is the internet, in a very literal sense. 

      • meowmix

        an awfull lot of people think google is the internet, shite, the amount of people i’ve seen complain to google because they don’t like somthing in the alt.* hierachy is very entertaining.

        • Deadharbor

           Google pwns.

    • Popehat

      They want to remove these sites from the net. So why not also remove all traces that they ever existed? (By removing dead links)

      • meowmix

        maybe leaving them is showing people that once, the net was a much better place than it currently is.

  • Andrew Lee

    Really I want to know how these stupid mother fuckers became millionaires… It defies all logic.
    Their stupidity never ceases to amaze me because just when I thought they could not do anything dumber news like this comes along.

    I mean really rofl my toaster has a higher IQ than these “insert vulgar obscenity too filthy to put into words”

    Well I feel better now O_O

    • Anyone

      it’s just a way to put pressure on Google so they start to proactively censoring like they want it to

  • Redfire Nospam

    As I recall from a previous article a part of the DMCA requires a form of sworn statement testifying that requester has the rights to the content and that the information is accurate and true for a request to be valid. If I submit an affidavit that an individual stole my car and that information is later proven false I would face serious criminal charges as well as open myself up for a civil lawsuit from the individual I accused.

  • http://digg.com/users/OmegaWolf Silver Fang

    If I were Google, I would tell Big Content to get bent and not remove a single link.

    • Anyone

      Google wants content for their Play store, so they sadly have to play ball :/

  • 0omg

    this will stop the day google start charging a fee for each takedown request …. 

    • MPAA

       We can’t afford to pay a fee. You pirates took all our money.

      • Viva la Pirate

         If you keep your mouth shout in the first place (earlier) I might as well consider feeding you MAFIAA shitee my earning from piracy…Uhm wait but first get me back my Megaupload so tat I can cash out to feed you idiot with shit.

  • http://twitter.com/Anime4PSP Anime 4 PSP

    Conclusion? Punish ignorant idiots and ban them from sending dmca notices for some period

  • foff

    I have a job for anonymous.  Create millions of links to bogus sites.  Then google and these bots will be so occupied taking down fake links they will leave us alone.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Don-Dilly/1624894683 Don Dilly

    The takedowns if nothing else point to the fact they are trawling google by media name and if nothing else it shows that they do not verify that the media at the end of the url even exists let alone download it to verify the file is infact infringing.

    It certainly identifies rightsholders methods as abusive  and explains the high levels of false positive takedowns.

    Also surely rightsholders demanding google filterdead links to pirated media is actually assisting downloaders. It would be far better for rightsholders to verify the links and only demand the removal of working links.

    The other issue raised for the likes of megaupload. is that if a user publicly posts an infringing file. no matter how fast the cyberlocker acts to remove the offending file. The uploader continually posting links to the file (often using automated tools) can spam the net with that and no doubt links to 100s of other iffy files, the uploader is rarely going to check the file still exists but even 1000s of dead links can lead to a false impression of the cyberlocker as a criminal filesharing hub. Ultimately all because the rights agent didnt verify the links,

    On a similar issue. A media work is often licensed by different companies in different territories each licensee utilising their own protection outfits with different approaches and no central coordination. This can give rise to oneprotection outfit flooding P2P sites and networks with fakes while another without verification is issuing dmca takedowns. Again, the increased volume of uploads and dmca takedowns give a false impression of a site when the real media might not even be available online.

    There is way too much abuse of DMCA

    • Jason202

      DMCA abuse is a red herring.  The real abuse is from those who steal content and “share” it, AKA pirates profiting from piracy.  

      The DMCA is pretty useless and for those who can’t afford IP services, pretty damn time-consuming and costly.  Why should the burden of proof be on the creators and not those who USE (steal) their creations?

      • Anyone

        almost all of those links are about non-profit piracy, and it has been shown that that is not only not harmful to artists, but actually beneficial (of course, it is harmful to the middlemen ripping off the artists)

        the DMCA has to be corrected, it needs a fee for each takedown request or at the very least a harsh fine for every wrong takedown
        censorship should not be tolerated or even legalized like this

      • d_e_n_n_i_s

        Theft is more strongly hyperbolic, emphasizing or exaggerating the perceived harm of infringement to copyright holders who choose to utilize their copyrights for profit; it connotes a kind of loss which infringement may not actually effect, and the U.S. Supreme Court has even ruled that infringement does not “easily” equate with theft.

      • MPAA

         That’s right, you’re all guilty until you prove otherwise.

        • Blackstetson117

          I accuse the Media industries of false advertisement, too often making a movie look interesting in the trailer and in reality it was crap. I also accuse them of extortion, bribery of government officials, perjury, and defamation of character, liable, and the list goes on start proving otherwise!

      • FluffChop

        Who is “profiting” from sharing? Where did that come from? No you can’t slip that in without some proof son. The file sharing community is NOT about onselling the files, it’s about providing a service where someone buys something and shares it with the community. Virtually every movie ends up on TV, every song ends up on the radio, every book ends up in the library and the end user doesn’t pay for that sharing service. Selling the files, THAT would be illegal, sharing them in a community isn’t.

      • Colin Carr

         The problem with your argument here is that Google are receiving TODAY requests to take down dead links from, among others, MegaUpload which went offline almost 9 months ago.
        In other words, these takedown requests refer to links that not only don’t exist, but which CAN’T exist! As they can’t exist, nobody can use them, therefore no infringement is being facilitated.
        Put it another way, the MAFIAA could be sending out DMCA takedowns based on links created by a random number generator.
        I think it might be worth Dotcom’s while to collate all these Megaupload takedown requests that refer to times after the site was destroyed at the MAFIAA’s request. It would certainly be a bit embarrassment if they are ever brought to trial.
        If the Megaupload case is dropped, Dotcom could be just the man to take up the issue of ‘penalty of perjury’.   

      • Blackstetson117

         Burden of proof in any legal proceeding is the job of the prosecution not the defendant.
        Your point is so painfully unaware, but hey lets go with it, Pirates, We need you to prove you’re not pirating. Oh Okay well here are our legit servers don’t ask about the ones in the back…..Looks good.

      • Nightshining

        Because that was the way United States law period was written. First thing you are taught in law school. Burden of proof falls squarely on the shoulders of the prosecution. Innocent until proven guilty. The moment a dmca is filed by the company that company then becomes the plaintiff. Or in laymens terms prosecution. Which means they have the burden of proof. What you sir are advocating is that the government assume you guilty by default. Which no offense in my opinion makes you one of the people responsible for this nations lack of giving a damn about the little guy.

  • TFreak
    • Violated0

      Paper Street Cash, LLC must have been high on crack to do a take down request on 214 domains at once including TF.

      I also see they got TechDirt.

  • Darkhog

    Well, they are preparing for BTJ/MU/Demonoid return because they know they’ll lose.

  • Violated0

    This only goes to show the DMCA take-down process for these organizations has no brain involved. This also highlights that they do not even check the link where beyond dead sites they don’t even check to see if it is another person’s media under a similar name. So the widespread abuse of DMCA law contains daily on retarded systems that just censor away anything and everything they disapprove of.

    Then let us not forget rights holders filing DMCA take down requests must sign the document to say the information is true on charge of perjury. At this stage of the game such abuse and misuse should be subject to contempt of court and jail time.

    I can’t say why we now have the DMCA shit hole of censorship we have but I expect the situation to fix itself were fines for abuse implement, A simple dead domain one like this should be $5 to $20.

    Google should step up; the game themselves. These companies have done enough false requests for Google to ban them. So they can choose to pay Google a fine or they would get banned for system abuse. This idea would also help Google to fund their service to process DMCA notices.

  • Anon

    If people would respect digital property ownership and the associated legals rights that are an inherent part of that ownership we wouldn’t even be having this conversation. Pirates make plain they believe they have “rights” to infringe and make and distribute unlawful copies using whatever means necessary, masking, onion routing, wifi hacking, VPN, encryption, anonymizing software, tunneling, you name it, pirates have no conscience.

    So I say let the games begin and you can suffer whatever consequences industry money and their influence can purchase for themselves. And in the meantime, keep your mouth shut about how the other side plays the game until you get some respect for the rights others in the first place. Do the crime, enjoy the time. lol 

    • Anyone

      if the MAFIAA would respect their customers there would be no “piracy problem”

      it’s easy to compete with piracy, simply offer a better product (as Steam or Netflix do, for example)

      but of course they’d rather cripple the whole internet than to offer a product the customers actually want to buy
      it’s simply unchecked greed and trying to cling on to a “golden age” where they can overcharge for a product and keep 90% of the earnings instead of giving it to the artist

      • http://twitter.com/Mathew30 Mathew Lisett

         its not as such the product ie service, its the red tape thats stopping, ie the distribution. as it has recently been shown via a TF article , netflix were supposedly holding legal alternatives yet you couldnt get it due to country restriction

      • ANON

        HOME TAPING IS KILLING MUSIC

        • meowmix

          i laughed when i read that as i can remember that being bandied about back when i was an ankle biter.

    • ScrewEwe2

       „?o? ????? ??? ?o?u? ‘????? ??? op ?????d ?s??? ??? u? s????o s????? ??? ?o? ???ds?? ??os ??? no? ???un ???? ??? s???d ?p?s ????o ??? ?o? ?noq? ?n?s ??no? ?no? d??? ‘????u??? ??? u? pu? ?s????s???? ?o? ?s????nd u?? ??u?n??u? ????? pu? ??uo? ???snpu? s??u?nb?suo? ???????? ????ns u?? no? pu? u???q s???? ??? ??? ??s ? os

      ???u???suo? ou ???? s?????d ‘?? ???u no? ‘?u???uun? ‘??????os ?u?z???uou? ‘uo??d???u? ‘ud? ‘?u????? ???? ‘?u??no? uo?uo ‘?u??s?? ‘???ss???u su??? ???????? ?u?sn s??do? ?n????un ??nq???s?p pu? ???? pu? ??u???u? o? „s?????„ ???? ???? ??????q ???? u???d ???? s?????d ?uo???s???uo? s??? ?u???? ?q u??? ?,up?no? ?? d??s??u?o ???? ?o ???d ?u????u? u? ??? ???? s????? s????? p?????oss? ??? pu? d??s??u?o ????do?d ??????p ???ds?? p?no? ??do?d ??„

      Huh? What?

       ”lol .emit eht yojne ,emirc eht od .ecalp tsrif eht ni srehto sthgir eht rof tcepser emos teg uoy litnu emag eht syalp edis rehto eht woh tuoba tuhs htuom ruoy peek ,emitnaem eht ni dna .sevlesmeht rof esahcrup nac ecneulfni rieht dna yenom yrtsudni secneuqesnoc revetahw reffus nac uoy dna nigeb semag eht tel yas i os

      .ecneicsnoc on evah setarip ,ti eman uoy ,gnilennut ,erawtfos gnizimynona ,noitpyrcne ,npv ,gnikcah ifiw ,gnituor noino ,gniksam ,yrassecen snaem revetahw gnisu seipoc lufwalnu etubirtsid dna ekam dna egnirfni ot “sthgir” evah yeht eveileb yeht nialp ekam setarip .noitasrevnoc siht gnivah eb neve t’ndluow ew pihsrenwo taht fo trap tnerehni na era taht sthgir slagel detaicossa eht dna pihsrenwo ytreporp latigid tcepser dluow elpoep fi”

      Huh? What the hell are you talking about? You’re not making a bit of sense.

      • http://twitter.com/Mathew30 Mathew Lisett

         fuck me did your keyboard screw up?

      • guest

        to read the above message, flip screen upside down

        • http://twitter.com/Mathew30 Mathew Lisett

           or just read the original post by Anon

    • http://twitter.com/Mathew30 Mathew Lisett

       i can see you being a troll here , but ill bite a litte.  Ive said many times, even directly to the companies and mpaa stating if there was a reasonable payment system that allowed users to pay for content they download from anywhere they wished, the aim the companies always bitch about is that users always want it for nothing. yet its bullshit. they dont wish to give in to the fact allowing a payment system like that would actually work and would show every single report out there that piracy doesnt benefit is full of shite.  Christ 10 years ago, they blamed the start of the gaming demise offline  becuase of the rising needs of online digital streaming of games. 10 years on, companies are only just starting to understand that in only a few years, most of the money will come from online users. we even have multiple entertainment heads stating in PUBLIC at official events that pirates have never been the issue, its been copyright monopoly.  Hell as via my write up http://www.scribd.com/doc/76156718/Piracy-Guide-to-How-It-Can-Work-for-All i did a test to not download like i would, and actually find the legal official site for torchwood. tried to purchase the episode as they always claim there are legal alternatives to p2p, yet what a shocker it stated it couldnt happen becuase i was not in the correct country. so enough of the utter bollocks that every p2p user is out there just to gain free content and that were are all thieves. yes there are a few, but fuck me, ive stated openly (not mentioned the film…wouldnt want that given as evidence) that if certain films that others had watched and liked, via their own way and there was a legal payment system at a fair price  , then they may get a shock and start trusting what we have been saying for years.

    • d_e_n_n_i_s

      The word evokes the trolls of Scandinavian folklore and children’s tales, where they are often creatures bent on mischief and wickedness

    • MPAA

       That’s right, so what if innocent people have to suffer. As long as we get what we think we deserve.

    • Viva la Pirate

       We pirate at least are environmental friendly unlike MAFIAA fool who wasting money producing disc and sell it at inflated price.

      If I were an artist who can produce and compose my own music (there are a lot really like Big Bang and etc.) why we need those blood sucker label company?
      Think about it again…

    • Colin Carr

      You make the wrong, but understandable, mistake of thinking it is ONLY about the civil matter of copyright infringement.
      No, it’s about the 1% trying to turn the clock back to pre internet times when they controlled the comparatively few radio, TV and newspaper publishers. That was when they controlled what everyone ‘knew’ was happening in the world.
      Then along came the ‘net, and anyone could publish a blog! SHIT! We can’t have that! Somebody might start leaking loads of embarrassing government secrets, like for instance, oh I don’t know, maybe gun camera film of Iraqi civilians being murdered by US Army helicopters in Baghdad, or Afghan war logs.
      If that happened, the American people who, unlike their government, are mostly decent, honest folks; might start questioning their masters. DEFINITELY can’t have that. OK, let’s make a big fuss about copyright ‘theft’ and get our bought & paid for corrupt politicians to pass draconian laws to control it. That way, we can slip in widespread censorship as nothing more than a little collateral damage. 

      • MPAA

         Even we can’t disagree with you here.

        …I mean, uhm… stop stealing our hard work… because of you we had to fire a janitor and an electrician today. Stop being so greedy and just give up all your rights so we can keep spitting on you worthless losers.

    • Guest

      In other words, you’re going to fuck the laws until you bend them into what you want. And you whine about people downloading stuff. Really? If you’ve got so much money to pay for laws, are you really being crippled by piracy? How many years has the industry been dying now – ten? It’s taking a damn long time to die for something on its knees!

      At some point you’ll piss off enough people that laws won’t matter. What do you think Prohibition was?

      Go back to crying for Evan Stone and Andrew Crossley. That’s what “playing the game” does for you, you industry-fellating douche. Howzabout you go get daddy Pelouzey to wipe some industry ointment on that HADOPIed butthurt of yours!

      • meowmix

        the record industry has been dying ever since the home tape recorder came along, as the guy who posted pointed out ’HOME TAPING IS KILLING MUSIC’.

        for an industry that has been dying for over 40 years, they sure are taking a long time about it. i susspect the music industry suffers from hypercondria.

    • Guest

      “So I say let the games begin”

      You’re about 12 years too late. The games already took place. Spoiler: we won. 

      The MAFIAA is retarded, however, so they don’t realize this and keep struggling to triumph in a war that’s over. Filesharing is an accepted part of society. That shit is not going back in the box no matter how hard any copyright exploiter kicks and screams. 

    • Jmorse43508

       Anono: well known MAFIAA troll who posts regularly on TF.

      Nothing to see here!

  • Mr. T

    What’s the actual difference between a cyberlocker like Megaupload and a cloud storage site like Dropbox? I don’t really notice any significant differences, is it just a terminology thing?

    • Anyone

      cyberlockers allow sharing, so they are useful to send large files over email
      I don’t think cloud storage is that open, but I never used one so I can’t tell from first hand experience

      but they are very related

      • http://twitter.com/Mathew30 Mathew Lisett

         its axtually pretty much the exact sme thing, only difference being the username and password would be passed around, but thats just the same as passing around the links from the lockers. hell when the cloud idea came about, i mentioned it being a piracy issue from the get go, even tweeting mpaa saying they are as thick as shit having a go at p2p, and promoting cloud based services when its going to eventually have the same effect. and now all of a sudden we are getting reports from “experts” saying exactly that

        • Anyone

          when did the MPAA promote cloud storage?
          that seems like a non-20th century thing of them to do, so it is unlikely

        • http://twitter.com/Mathew30 Mathew Lisett

           i hate it when the reply tab is missed of the edge becuase of the bloody layout. anyways

          to ” Anyone”they actually tweeted it, and it was an article tweeted via  tech site. this was a good 6 months ago or more. they were saying the cloud service is the safest and best way to gain content. where as the editor of the article pointed out the obvious flaws  and blindness to mpaa logic or their “oh shit didnt think of that”

  • Pingback: Torrent News » Anti-Piracy Outfits Think Megaupload, Demonoid & BTjunkie Are Still Alive

  • dat guy

    Anyway thanks atleast this helps weed out all the dead URLs on google so that when i search for content i get applicable links to what im searching for. Whether legimate or not

  • http://www.facebook.com/doctorvad.gers DoctorVad Gers

    Simple, free way to stop the bots would be the requirement to complete a Captcha or some other form of ‘are you a human’ check in order to submit a takedown request. The automated requests would bounce and the amount of submissions would tumble if the RIAA MPAA etc had to pay real wages to employ people to file the requests.

    • David

      ways around captcha bro

  • Just Curious

    Again not really news..  But I guess you can remove it again… just more Torrent Freak Censorship! 

  • Phil Landry

    So wrong! The problem is Napster and KaZaa!

    • Guest

      They probably still think the original Napster of 1999 is still operating!

  • ScrewEwe2

    DMCA Bot’s are Twat’s and the rightsholders are Dicks. They can fuck each other IMO.

    • Colin Carr

       Nah, twats and dicks are useful.  ;-)

  • Afronauts

    So like they think once a site is dead, they still think it’s active…? Seriously? Uh….stupid world is stupid. I feel brain dead reading this article lol…oh and people who nickname themselves “IPhone” or “Facebook” shows how original people can be now a days. inb4 massive flamewar.

  • d_e_n_n_i_s

    7 months and 19 days actually.  In all that time there seems to be no consideration if extradition offences have really been committed in New Zealand influenced, perhaps by the tone of the indictment and it’s allegations against this huge criminal “conspiracy”.  Perhaps the Federal judges should look into that.  The relevant section is 198 of the New Zealand Copyright Act which provides a maximum sentence of 3 months whereas extradition requests may only apply to conduct liable to 12 months by the Extradition Act.  In any event I suggest that Megaupload staff have already served their 3 months don’t you think?  “So, isn’t it
    surprising to you that when I’m the “pirate king” and I’m causing all this
    damage that none of them has ever even attempted to sue us, to sue us for
    damages, you know?  If you would run a business that loses billions of dollars because of me, you wouldn’t just sit there and do nothing.  I mean, this investigation was ongoing for over two years, you know, the company was live for over seven years, the MPAA has always thrown names at us and called us all kinds of things but they’ve never actually done anything to, you know, take us to court and for the very simple reason that there is a law in the US that protects us which is the Digital Millennium Copyright Act that protects online service providers from actions of their users and this is the same law that allowed Google to still exist, that allowed YouTube to still exist.  They’ve won their lawsuit and they’re still in business, and I’m sitting in jail, my house has been raided, all my assets are frozen without a trial, without a hearing. This is completely insane, that’s what it is”.

  • Anonymouse

    Google should charge for takedowns.

    • David

      Studios should charge for downloads

      • Anyone

        they do
        they just offer such a shitty service that people pirate instead

  • T.H.E. S.W.A.R.M.

    Demonoid, Megaupload and Btjunkie are still very much alive in all of us

    WE ARE THE SWARM !!

    YOUR DATA WILL BE ASSIMILATED !!

    RESISTANCE IS FUTILE !!

     

    • meowmix

      wouldn’t it be cool if the next generation of distributed p2p had a borg web page with the slogan “all of your data will be assimilated, resistance is futile”. or that as the mantra of the next gen of p2p. the way the internet should be, freedom of information, art and entertainment.

      power to the collective.

  • guest

    they need to file a lawsuit on terms of harassment

  • Hapiex

    Seems they had a problem with this! http://www.whatisatorrent.org/u-s-government-shuts-down-84000-websites-by-mistake

  • fawntee

    Well, Anti Piracy outfits are idiots, but we already knew that. Tell us something we dont know lol

    Anon-Real.tk

  • Phantom1412kid

    Whatever happened to the Perjury punishment for erroneous DMCAs?

    Sure the BIG Copyright Whores can take you to court for alleged file sharing but they can’t even get cited for the millions of unchecked DMCAs they’ve sent.

    The system is SO rigged against the little guy.

    • Daveid

      Whatever happened to infringement?

      • Anyone

        still carrying on like nothing happened
        thanks for asking

  • Target1888

    Since when did Google become the ‘internet police’ ??!!??

    Besides… Services like Google, Demonoid, and BTJunkie etc. don’t even actually HOST any alleged content anyway, so I find it hard to see any justifiable basis for ANY complaints or actions involving them at all… So the media whiners have clearly proven they have NO CLUE what world they live in. LOL

  • mamoo

    Do they have schizophrenia?

    • FluffChop

      lol, that’s an insult to schizophreniacs ;) It implies these people even have minds to begin with. It reminds me of that movie “Idiocracy” where the world is full of dumb people. Hang on is that movie fiction or documentary? lol

  • Bastetx5922

    And here we were thinking all these anti-piracy crowds are duplicitous government lobbying toadys, but it turns out they really are muppets, that have more money than sense and dont really know what they are doing ..
    Wow I thought governments and corporates hired the best … 

  • Guest

    That’s how out of touch they are.
    It proves they know nothing of what they demand, so how meaningful could those demands be?
     How long will society have to carry the unreasonable demands enabled by a flawed copyright legislation? It hurts society so much. I’d like to know when this madness will finally end.

  • http://torrentfreak.com/ Rob8urcakes

    This is one of the best articles of the year, thanks TF and Andy/enigmax.

    It not only shows us just how dumb, inefficient and careless the ‘industry’ is but it also highlights how crappy, out-of-date and wrong Google is when returning so-called hits.

    So I reckon Google’s greed and stupidity is shown here just as much as the MAFIAA’s is too.  And both organisations are wasting a lot of OUR time and effort with false outdated info.

    We need a better and more accurate search engine that will return proper ‘real’ results.

  • 187654

    WANTED :
    Lawyer willing to file a class-action law-suit against the obscenity industry .
    They are in reality violating US Law and pornography is not covered by copyright .
    Personally, I’m seeking 1 million USD per published ‘work’ for the emotional distress
    caused by the smut-peddlers !   

  • Bloaxor

    Well isn’t this a perfectly legitimate reason for The Googlefather to give them the finger.

  • Guest

    I don’t know if they’re paranoid or simply dumb.

    • USAin Bolt

      Both! but what else can be expected from US-Assholes.
      Land of the free……as long as you can afford it.

  • Pingback: Torrent News » les groupes Anti-piratage pensent que Megaupload, Demonoid et BtJunkie sont toujours en vie …

  • Ya

    google should fine/charge for false takedown claims 

  • Pingback: Technable | Making you Technically Able

  • Pingback: The Wright Computer Services » Google Gets Tons of Takedown Requests For Sites That Don’t Even Exist Anymore [Copyright]

  • Pingback: Google Gets Tons of Takedown Requests For Sites That Don’t Even Exist Anymore [Copyright] | azkafaiz.com

  • Mommy’s boy

    Wow, I just went and congratulated my mom, cuz she fuckin knew better.

  • Pingback: Google Gets Tons of Takedown Requests For Sites That Don’t Even Exist Anymore [Copyright] « VidenOmkring

  • Pingback: Google Gets Tons of Takedown Requests For Sites That Don’t Even Exist Anymore [Copyright] | 1v8 NET

  • Pingback: Anti-Piracy Organizations Continue Sending DMCA Notices | TheTechJournal

  • Pingback: Google Gets Tons of Takedown Requests For Sites That Don’t Even Exist Anymore [Copyright] | Dress Juice

  • Pingback: The Wright Computer Services » Anti-Piracy Outfits Think Megaupload, Demonoid & BTjunkie Are Still Alive (Enigmax/TorrentFreak)

  • Dino

    After so many false reports, google should make them do a TON of work to get their submit rights back.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=589676199 Courtney Harold Barker

    They can take down what they want. We will just go deeper underground 

  • GoogleFightBack

    I still cant figure out why they should be allowed to send DMCA notices to a search engine, can someone explain this? a search engine doesn’t host any of the content nor does it link directly to it, only to the page hosting the supposedly “infringing content”. search engines are only there to index webpages not promote or demote anything.

    Its like punishing someone (google) in a bank hostage situation, simply because they didn’t suicidally rush they’re captors to prevent the bank (MAFIAA) from being “robbed”.

  • Michael meabon

    We the people need to stand up on not only blacklisting websites that share copyrighted materials but all the internet material except the sick child porn sites and maybe a few others but we are getting our rights took away one by one. We are rapidly moving toward a New World Order  come on folks stop letting the leaders of the world get richer while we just get poorer and their ultimate goal is to kill off the strong and make slaves out of the rest of us pretty much like it is now with taking away good foods and putting their poison that slowly is killing us in our food, milk, and juices. the government raid our farms so farmers cant sell their milk,veggies,and meat that has not been injected with their hormones and antibiotics. all the fast food and chain stores are all ran by the government in one way or another and if they don’t follow their guide lines they get shut down. Lets stand up for our selves and not let them take advantage of us or kill us off with their experiments and medications also food. 

  • d_e_n_n_i_s

    JAY V. PRABHU, Chief,
    CYBER-crime unit, Department of Justice in the United States of America,
    accuses a New Zealander of the following:

     

    5 instances of fraud and/or aiding and abetting fraud

    4 instances of criminal copyright infringement and/or aiding and
    abetting those infringements

    Criminal
    copyright infringement by distributing a copyrighted work being prepared for
    commercial distribution on a computer network and/or aiding or abetting that
    infringement

    Conspiracies to launder money, racketeer,
    and infringe copyright

     

    You have put your signature to this, Sir.

     

    Now, I would suggest that you produce your
    evidence of this as directed by the North Shore District Court in the city of
    Takapuna, NEW ZEALAND on 29 May 2012 allowing you 21 days to do so, and held by
    the CHIEF HIGH COURT JUDGE in this jurisdiction as what you must do

     

    If you don’t do so I warn you it may tend
    to piss-off that apparently sheepish lot often referred to as the baby-boomers
    in this country, and when they do get pissed-off they get pissed off,
    especially in relation to Apartheid, American nuclear arsenal and American wars
    in Vietnam.  Moreover the average
    general-standard of educated thinker from that time would outmatch your legal
    education and would-be “influence” in any debate [see publicaddress.net/2424]

     

    It doesn’t appear that any of your
    accusations allow you to seek extradition because the would-be offence of
    infringing copy gains a 3-month only maximum term here (section 198 of our Act)
    so what do you say to that and why are you wasting our time?

     

    Why don’t you just head on back to North
    Shore Police Station and hand yourself in because conspiring to make false
    accusation could become a serious matter should we be required to seek
    extradition

     
     

  • Deadharbor

    The problem is that they’re not smart enough technologically to make the internet work for them.

    They can argue about ethics and morality all they want but at the end of the day, they’re going to lose if they keep on fighting the inevitable. You can’t turn back time so it’s just stupid to keep arguing and “educating” everyone that piracy is stealing.

  • morbidcorpse

    Am I the only one not worried when a bunch of crappy, public sites I’ve never used, get taken down?  Megaupload, hotfile (or whatever its called?)…who cares?  Let these sites go down and let the RIAA and MPAA think they’ve won and the war is over.  Meanwhile, those of us using little known, private bit torrent sites can just keep doing what we do and all sides are happy.  We get what we want.  They get what they want.  Everyone wins.

  • Elizeu Junior

    I think the correct legal process would be: 1-download the illegal content to see if its really illegal (a file’s name, format and size isnt enough to check authenticity); 2-contact the owner’s, to see if he really doesnt have autorization for the content (i guess you cant part from the principle that the owners is infring copyright if you dont know); 3-Prove step 1 and 2 and file a takedown request; 4-Google should warn the owner about the takedown in case this one wants to process the company making the request; 5-???? profit

  • Anon

    Google I need you to take down this thing called Napster.

  • Pingback: Pese a estar cerrado, siguen solicitando a Google retirar links a Megaupload - FayerWayer

  • Pingback: Pese a estar cerrado, siguen solicitando a Google retirar links a Megaupload | SoftMexico - (SinapsysMx)

  • tiqiann

     http://lnk.co/I2VI9

  • Perceptivecomplex

    OK, there needs to be a better way to handle this. The current laws are not only going to violate freedom of information entirely but are being currently abused. Why? Because the majority of the public is uneducated on the subject or could care less. If what happened to mega upload were applied to the entire internet then what would happen? Literally all sites that have “sharing” capabilities will shut-down. Basically destroying the essence of the internet.

    Mayor Reform In The United States Is Necessary!
      -and hopefully this reform will deal with all this takedown request abuse.

    *though i highly doubt that will happen anytime soon.

  • Pingback: | swanksocial | Google Gets Tons of Takedown Requests For Sites That Don’t Even Exist Anymore [Copyright] |

  • Pingback: Google erhält Copyright-Beschwerden für bereits gelöschte Daten - GIZMODO DE - Das Gadget-Weblog

  • Pingback: Anti-piracy outfits beating a dead horse? - Techindustriya.com

  • Pingback: Despite being closed, are requesting Google remove links to Megaupload | Tech News Pedia

  • Pingback: Pese a estar cerrado, siguen solicitando a Google retirar links a Megaupload Noticias

  • Senibudi

    Yes those site are no longer available NOW.  But those link would be live when those sites rises like a phoenix .. that is what happen to the demonoid link when it returns month later ..

     

  • Pingback: La industria de la música continúa pidiendo a Google que elimine enlaces de Megaupload

  • Pingback: The music industry continues to ask Google to remove links to Megaupload | Tech Crash

  • Pingback: La industria de la música continúa pidiendo a Google que elimine enlaces de Megaupload | Desgobierno de Chile

  • Pingback: La industria de la música continúa pidiendo a Google que elimine enlaces de Megaupload

  • Pingback: La industria de la música continúa pidiendo a Google que elimine enlaces de Megaupload - La Isla Buscada

  • Pingback: La industria de la música continúa pidiendo a Google que elimine enlaces de Megaupload « BlackBerry Warez | Blog

  • Pingback: News/Noticia: La industria de la música continúa pidiendo a Google que elimine enlaces de Megaupload | MegaLogy.Com - Dosis De Informacion Tecnologica Actualizada!

  • Pingback: Musikindustrie reklamiert weiterhin Megaupload-Links | Binzl Online

  • Pingback: La industria de la música continúa pidiendo a Google que elimine enlaces de Megaupload Noticias

  • Pingback: La industria de la música continúa pidiendo a Google que elimine enlaces de Megaupload | www.Faltariamas.com

  • Pingback: RedUSERS | Siguen solicitando a Google que borre links de Megaupload

  • Pingback: La industria de la música continúa pidiendo a Google que elimine enlaces de Megaupload | TECNOLOGIA Y NOTICIAS

  • Pingback: rapidhelp.com.ar | Siguen solicitando a Google que borre links de Megaupload

  • Derp

    why is it google’s job to remove content links. it is a search engine it searches the internet. i don’t see how it is their job or responsibility to take down search results.

  • Pingback: Megaupload et les sites vides gênent encore les Majors (DMCA)

  • Pingback: Discográficas siguen solicitando a Google que elimine enlaces de Megaupload

  • Pingback: Anti-piratage : Des plaintes contres des sites qui n'existent plus ! | UnderNews

  • Pingback: Siguen solicitando a Google que borre links de Megaupload :CDC831 EN LA WEB SIN RESTRINCCIONES

  • Pingback: La industria de la música continúa pidiendo a Google que elimine enlaces de Megaupload | El Correo

  • Doxie56

    me thinks this site is in violation of our freedom of speech, judging by the amount of comments either removed or being “reviewed”.  Maybe someone tried to tell us how to find our fave sites that ARE up and running elsewhere?

  • just a person

    thanks to those fat cats demands google is getting more useless each day i will just look for something better bye google

  • Bob Bobson

    Obviously their whole system is automated. That’s a good thing because you can just ignore them since they obviously don’t follow up on anything.

    On the other hand, maybe they are just trying to be helpful by nudging Google to keep their system clean by getting rid of broken links. :-P

  • Pingback: Siguen solicitando a Google que borre links de Megaupload – Tecnoinforme

  • Lbl

    Dont these rich people have anything better to do . They make all the millions….they should hire people to find and bust them…not bug the government with this stuff.

  • BTGuard - BitTorrent Anonymously

NewsBits

Even more news...

  • Pirate Bay Founder Gottfrid Svartholm on Freedom of Speech

    Freedom of speech is a highly valued commodity, but should people be allowed to say whatever...

  • Blu-ray Anti-Piracy Tech Stops Discs and Promotes Purchases

    An anti-piracy system present in all official Blu-ray players since 2012 has received a fresh update...

  • Foxtel Breeds Pirates by Locking Up Game of Thrones

    One of the main reasons why people turn to piracy is the lack of legal alternatives....

  • UK Student Admits Breaching Sony Copyrights With Leak of PS3 SDK

    Last year an Internet user known as El Nomeo leaked version 3.70 of Sony’s Playstation3 SDK...

  • Pirates Can Be Identified Despite Sharing IP Addresses, ISP Claims

    Carrier-Grade Network Address Translation is a network mechanism through which many Internet subscribers can share the...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

PopularArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.