TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

Dotcom’s Mega Removes Legal Files Citing Bogus DMCA Requests

In recent days thousands of files have been removed from Kim Dotcom’s Mega, some based on bogus (DMCA) takedown notices. In some cases it takes just minutes before Mega disables access to users’ files, claiming they’ve received a takedown notice from a copyright holder. Ironically, Mega also removed access to Kim Dotcom’s own music. The big question is whether there’s a rogue copyright holder on the loose, or if Mega is actively policing the Internet.

megaWith the newly launched Mega, Kim Dotcom and his associates are doing all they can to be “good corporate citizens.” However, there are signs that under the current setup users rights are being trumped to accommodate copyright holders.

TorrentFreak has received reports from people whose perfectly legal files were locked in their Mega accounts for alleged copyright violations. In all cases this happened after these users published links to the files elsewhere on the Internet.

A quick look on some of the Mega indexing sites shows that these are not isolated incidents. Thousands of publicly shared Mega files are now dead links but while many of these pointed to copyrighted material, there’s also quite a bit of collateral damage.

Mega-search.me, one of the larger Mega indexes, became a repository of dead links overnight. The site in question allows the public to post links to files shared on Mega. It currently lists nearly 8,000 links, but apart from the most recent submissions these are “no longer available” on Mega.


Mega takedown

mega-removed

The censored content includes copyrighted music and movies, but also free to share software such as Ubuntu and copies of Kim Dotcom’s very own music. Interestingly, this mass removal of files appears to contradict Kim Dotcom’s statement earlier today that Mega receives just 50 DMCA takedown requests per day, unless of course there is additional proactive work underway.

Baroque Metal band DecaY from Lyon told TorrentFreak that the music they shared on Mega also fell victim to the mass takedowns.

“I am quite shocked that they would take out my insignificant 100% legal content in the blink of an eye,” the band’s Jeremy Allison says.

Certainly, something is not right.

To test how quickly a file is removed by Mega we decided to post some previously uploaded legal content to Mega-search.me ourselves. Our uploads included a few Dan Bull songs, a clip from the Pirate Bay documentary TPB-AFK, a video explaining fair use and Kim Dotcom’s single Mr. President.

Quite shockingly, the files were pulled down by Mega in a matter of minutes, claiming they had received copyright infringement notices for each of them.

We are in receipt of a takedown notice affecting the following public link
in your account:

https://mega.co.nz/#!iRQRnLzT

Please be reminded that MEGA respects the copyrights of others and requires that users of the MEGA cloud service comply with the laws of copyright. You are strictly prohibited from using the MEGA cloud service to infringe copyrights. You may not upload, download, store, share, display, stream, distribute, e-mail, link to, transmit or otherwise make available any files, data, or content that infringes any copyright or other proprietary rights of any person or entity.

Furthermore, please be reminded that, pursuant to our Terms of Service, accounts found to be repeat infringers are subject to termination.

It didn’t stop at one email either, as can be seen below.


Mega mails

mega-mails

Unfortunately no information was provided about the alleged copyright holder who sent the notice. TorrentFreak replied to the email asking for clarification, but we have yet to receive a response from Mega. So what’s going on here?

It appears that someone or something is checking all uploads on public indexes such as Mega-search.me to pull down all the links that are added. This clearly happens automatically and without any verification of the copyrighted status of the file.

The big question, however, is where these bogus takedown notices come from.

Is there a rogue copyright holder ordering Mega to remove thousands of files just minutes after they are posted? And does Mega then process these takedowns notices in near real-time without verifying the content?

Or could it be that Mega itself has put indexes such as Mega-search.me on a blacklist to prevent copyrighted material from spreading, perhaps in an effort to prevent potential bad press that comes with it?

Whatever the case, the end result is that users can’t access perfectly legal files stored in their Mega accounts until a counter notice is processed. This prevents them from sharing their own work in public and also makes it impossible for them to download it to their own computers.


Mega account issue

mega-account-issue

TorrentFreak reached out to Kim Dotcom through various channels for a comment on the issue, but we have yet to hear back. Readers are welcome to upload legal Mega links to Mega-search.me themselves to see what’s going on.

Update: Mega-search.me now blames Mega for taking the links down.

Related Posts

Previous Post | Next Post

  • EmirSc

    wtf, and where is the perfect system that only the person who uploads can see the contenc of a file… MEGA-fail

    • toysoldier

      If you share your files stored on MEGA with a public link … then everyone can see them. All my non shared music is still there.

      • EmirSc

        1 account: piracy
        2 account: personal files
        that should work

        • Christopher Kidwell

          That’s personally what I did. I put all the stuff that someone could bitch about on one account with a throw-away e-mail address and the rest of the stuff that is my personal files on another account.

        • lagoogy

          Oh god!!! I just could not function being this sneaky. It must oooz into your everyday life aswell! There must be ppl around you who think you are a right sneaky, not to be trusted person I just could not go through life like that and I think if someone makes a product and you want said product then you BUY said product. All this sneaking around and stealing stuff can’t be good for the soul. yeah you might save a few bucks, but in the grande scheme of things you aint getting away with shit.

        • Christopher Kidwell

          lagoogy, go fuck yourself.

        • fauxe

          Claiming that you can steal what is already in unlimited supply with no cost to reproduce is about as retarded as saying someone breathing near you is stealing your oxygen

          Makes no sense, really

        • Somebody_Else

          Actually the oxygen thief is slightly more valid.

        • bobmail

          Fail. While the reproduction didn’t cost much, the action PRODUCTION of the product cost plenty. Your failure to pay means that others have to bear that cost for you. Thus, you have created harm.

          Sorry, but the “it doesn’t cost anything” argument is weak and failing.

        • Anyone

          so what?
          that’s not my problem

          if they can’t make back their investment they suck as entrepreneurs and should find a different field of work

          since when are failing entrepreneurs the problem of society? adapt or die.

        • http://gene-poole.tumblr.com Gene Poole

          you want to know what’s a weak and failing argument? mixing “fixed cost” with “marginal” cost.

          Fixed cost is the total cost of creating something. that costs, say 500,000 for filming and producing a movie. For example.

          Variable cost is the cost of reproduction. If you’re talking a digital copy, that variable cost is zero.

          Businesses in a capitalist market compete with one another. These are variable costs. Any business that is incapable of competing in a free market should go out of business. Period.

          The reason the public doesn’t understand the difference between fixed costs and variable costs is because they don’t care. And they shouldn’t. Why is it our problem to make sure the movie and music industry can survive? Candystriper cancer ward. not our problem.

        • Guest

          I hope you paid all the manufacturing costs for the high-end tech needed to make the silicon wafers with which your computer functions, bobmail. You wouldn’t want to be a hypocrite now, would you?

          How’s your amnesty campaign for Andrew Crossley coming along, by the way? Claiming that he operated well within the limits of the law?

        • 2013sUxAlready

          what Kidwell said
          also: TROLL

        • lurgygurgy

          Your inability to function in reality is your own problem, not the fault of anyone here.

          And clearly he is ‘getting away with shit’.

          Got anything relevant to add to the conversation? Thought not.

        • commenter8

          I hope you encrypted the personal stuff yourself before putting it on Mega… I sure would…

    • Techanon

      I think that part is true, because it seems files are being taken down using blind shotgun approach.

  • hehe

    heheheheheheeeeeeeeeeeeeee

    • Guest

      what an idiot

  • SolarSky

    Now that the newest LTO-6-tapes&-drives from HP, IBM & Co. are available with 256-bit-AES-Encryption, it should be easy to run an alternative business model for long-time-data-storage… anyone?

  • Guest

    Wow, GEMA/Robert King. All that money spent on trying to take down a legal service that removes content faster than a tickled nose can sneeze – money well spent eh? Bobmail and that jizz on his face must be so PROUD of you.

    • Aleister

      Stop giving that retard credit he doesn’t deserve. AK has nothing to do with this. He only goes after gullible payment processors because that’s all he can do. If he started going after linking sites, we would know about it.

      • Guest

        still.. I think he put his hand on it in some way

      • tsunku

        actually he’s far more interested in receiving donations for his ‘nonprofit’ organization that last year profitted to the tune of almost 7 million dollars usd. funny how he bought himself a new car and house with that money, i could have sworn you’re not supposed to use nonprofit money as your personal money… but there won’t ever be any other investigation into him cuz the feds have a blinder on and are ignoring obvious and easily found out about crimes by anyone connected to mpaa/riaa/hollywood/anti-pirate. he could go out and kill someone and not get arrested. eventually tho the govt will suddenly realize how retarded it has been and will go after these clowns and when they do, we have the evidence for them to see. that will be a happy day.

  • Anonymofo

    The big question, however, is where these bogus takedown notices come from.

    My money’s on that Robert King twat.

    • Truthlol

      No one is going to mention mega loses 20 percent traffic EVERY DAY on alexa check it , its a dud a fad guys

      • lol

        lol yeah it said it was going to go down after initial hype but right now its beta so wait till all the bigs are worked out and there is megakey etc coming

      • ThumbsUpThumbsDown

        Wishful….. Very wish full……

      • NewWorldStoner

        You do realize that Alexa data is seriously flawed, right?

        Only users with Alexa toolbars contribute to that data.

    • bobmail

      My money is on Fat Kim himself, playing the sympathy card. You morons are getting played big time!

      • truthlol

        hes trying to pay court costs and mercedes costs, lol , i thought everyone knew???

      • GreenPirate

        You already said that.

      • Scary_Devil_Monastery

        Oh, because Dotcom is also the one sending Google millions of fake takedown notices as well?

        Not even a nice try, bobmail. But I fully realize that a lame claim and some invective is the most stable part of the arguments you make.

        • ScrewEwe2

          It wouldn’t surprise me a bit if bobmail is Robert King because bobmail showed up about the same exact time TF first posted articles about Robert King.

        • Scary_Devil_Monastery

          My money is on that “bobmail” is another well known pro-copyright maximalist troll re-appearing under a new nick since the old one had become too thoroughly discredited.

          It’s really interesting to see that at any given time there are two or three commenters around which possess identical argumentation and equal disregard for facts and truth, with equal ignorance of basic law, basic IT, and basic logic yet who feel compelled to comment on those topics with a heavy bias on the copyright side.

          And that those two or three names stop commenting at the same time two or three new names continue the argument in the same manner.

        • http://www.facebook.com/hector.r.barbossa Hector Rainbow Barbossa

          LOL. You look a bit silly now; https://mega.co.nz/#blog_5

        • Scary_Devil_Monastery

          You mean because I’m right I look silly?

          That’s a new one.

          Or were you trying to answer bobmail?

      • BallBiter

        wow only took you a few minutes to post the same thing just worded differently on the same blog, bored much?

      • 2013sUxAlready

        as stated by me in another comment in here. There are LOTS of alternatives to this MEGA. It is not the Megaupload that paid uploaders big time, not Filesonic, not Hotfile… the so to speak GOLDEN age of Filelockers is over… until these companies find another way to get around the anti-piracy nazis. The only suckers that are being played are the people that believe they can protect their made up imaginary property which they stole from creators anyway. Anyone foolish enough to believe piracy will just wither away after a few big alleged sources get illegally taken down is a fool and a half. GO figure why your crowd relies on semantics and government granted monopolies. Why you hide behind the big man. Can’t put a single fucking argument in a serious discussion other than backwards logic based on obsolete channels of distribution… I ain’t givin two shits about Mr.Schmitz’s imperium… it is not Megaupload. It even says in the logo. MEGA Beta…

  • dlovin122

    Welp… I will no longer use the new mega. His site will destroy itself soon. You just alienated the very people who keep your business afloat.

    • IHaveNoBalls

      I’ll continue to use MEGA if Kim explains himself and i’m satisfied.. Bottom line is, I don’t want to use a service which will disable access to my own files which I created… And to pay him for that would take the piss.. Sort it out Dotcom, you’re looking like the enemy right now…

    • http://modmyi.com/forums/iphone-4-new-skins-themes-launches/740147-neurotech-hd.html#post5637502 Jay

      Who ever is sending these mass takedown requests is very pleased to hear you say that.

  • Guest321

    Unless Dotcom can sort this shit out, MEGA is just about as useless as any other file hoster. All this encryption talk is just hogwash. MEGA is heading down the same road MU did. Abuse of DMCA is rampant and MEGA should enforce a policy of blacklisting those who send false takedown notices. Verification of DMCA notice validity should be mandatory prior to takedown.

    • Christopher Kidwell

      They should blacklist people who send false takedown requests, but I don’t see them doing it in all honesty. Doing that would have the Robert King’s of the world pitching a bitch about them doing that.

      • RIAAtarded

        that is a great idea. If you’re not taking the time to vet the file to be sure it is indeed something covered by your own copyright why can’t we have a 3 strikes rule against them? 3 incorrect DCMA takedowns you’re banned only seems fair. Either that or start charging for processing incorrect / flawed requests. No matter what way we look at it there needs to be penalty for abusing a system.

        • bobmail

          Doesn’t work like that, read the law – you cannot ignore the law just because you don’t think it works in your favor.

        • GreenPirate

          With all due respect, bobmail, fuck the law. Abolish the law. It no longer serves society to have this law.

        • bobmail

          Without DMCA, you would have no Youtube – it cannot exist under the existing copyright laws, it exists only because of the creation of safe harbor. But safe harbor does come with responsibility which Youtube found out about and took action.

          The law cuts both ways, you cannot toss out the parts you don’t like and only keep the parts that make you happy. The law applies to everyone, both sides, and neither side is absolutely happy.

        • Kiesha

          and a torrent file has never been ruled illigal but yet tpb have been targeted and targeted againso the law says ?

        • Scary_Devil_Monastery

          You are claiming the equivalent that a regime of constant abuse is OK as long as the beating is sometimes followed by a pat on the head for being brave. Nice.

          The DMCA in it’s entirety is worthy only of scorn and needs to go away.

          “The law cuts both ways, you cannot toss out the parts you don’t like and only keep the parts that make you happy.”

          That has never been true in any part of history. A law considered unacceptable is circumvented. This is the norm and not the exception. For that we have any number of examples in history.

        • Anyone

          then get rid of the DMCA AND copyright
          problem solved

        • RIAAtarded

          How is this for law, the organization requesting the DCMA takedown have fraudulently represented their ownership of said media and deprived the rightful owner of it’s access and have subjected their account sanctions. That is a quantifiable hardship on the legit end user and much like the rights holder want to be compensated so should those who have been adversely affected by incorrect claims. As to reading the law that statement is moronic. There is no law that is global to cover this. I think the fact there is an automated system is hugely generous and you should count your blessing it even exists. In reality they should charge you to process and remove them. Vetting each request for validity before doing so.

        • bobmail

          Prove that (a) they knew they didn’t own it, and (b) that they acted in bad faith. If you cannot, then within the DMCA law it is legal.

          Thanks for playing “understanding the law”.

        • Scary_Devil_Monastery

          “Prove that (a) they knew they didn’t own it, and (b) that they acted in bad faith. If you cannot, then within the DMCA law it is legal.”

          Applied to the real world, I could report you as a murderer by using an automated tool, you would be incarcerated – regularly – and have to prove your innocence each time.

          And the only way I could be censured, according to your inflamed logic, is by someone proving I did not know you did not commit the murder.

          This is logically impossible as it is not possible to prove a negative.

          For that reason and because the DMCA acts in this presumed-guilt setting, the DMCA is not compatible with any form of law existing in a first world country.

          “Thanks for playing “understanding the law”.”

          As you do not, proven here once again for all to see? Do go on, bobmail. Like Anon you are making the case for us quite well.

        • RIAAtarded

          Buy a globe m8 there is no ‘law’ on this matter that can be globally enforced. TO both these foolish points: They placed the DCMA request to have it removed so it is their responsibility to act in a good faith manner when removing said files. So yes they should know whether they own it or not. If they can’t be bothered to confirm it then there most definitely should be a penalty for making false claims. If you can’t do that don’t use DCMA.

        • John

          and if u look at teen/kids having sex, kids/teens drinking alchol, smoking, etc, are they not doing this and why do they ignore if kids are having sex with each otehr and teens etc since it is illigal? surely they shuld raid all the schools and lock up all the child molesterers in the schools before moving on to other things such as copywrong am i right?

        • Scary_Devil_Monastery

          Martin Luther King Jr. begs to differ.

          As does Gandhi, as did Rosa Parks, as did Jeffersson.

          As does, thinking of it, millions of citizens going about their daily lives, breaking the law on a casual basis without a single fuck being given.

          Copyright infringement is merely unlawful. Jaywalking is an actual crime, as is speeding.

          And in both the latter cases the moral support actually exists among the majority where it does not for copyright. Most people correctly assuming there’s nothing wrong in manufacturing a copy of information.

          But do go on with the Baghdad Bob lookalike act. Pretty soon we won’t be able to tell you from “Anon”.

      • Somebody_Else

        False takedown requests is actually illegal, but as nobody is prosecuting those offenders, it’s gotten rather rampant in it’s abuse.

        • bobmail

          Incorrect – knowingly filing in bad faith a false takedown is illegal. Everything else, even mistakes are legal under DMCA if they are done with good intent. Read the law.

          In NZ where there is no DMCA, there is no get back at all for false claims, as there are no provisions under standard copyright law to deal with this. It would be up to the person receiving the copyright notice to file a lawsuit, which is unlikely.

        • BuddhaFacePalmed

          I do enjoy reading your comments.
          “Everything else, even mistakes are legal under DMCA if they are done with good intent.”

          Good intention shouldn’t even be considered in the law. Bad, bad things are done with good intention, didn’t you know that?

          Ted Kaczynski only wanted to reduce humanity’s reliance on technology and get it back to be in tune with nature. Ioseb Besarionis dze Dzhugashvili was a patriot who wanted to free his fellow man from the tyranny of the capitalists and royalty.

          Both have good intentions. And both ended up with a large bodycount. So, don’t talk about good intentions. In this case, the result of collateral damage outweighs the positive effects.

        • bobmail

          “Good intention shouldn’t even be considered in the law. Bad, bad things are done with good intention, didn’t you know that?”

          Since we aren’t talking about murder or anything that actually harms anyone, your arguments are meaningless. Good faith acts are a significant part of many laws, something that you cannot get away from.

          The rest of your post is a meaningless piece of crap, trying to draw parallels where none exist. When copyright starts causing mass deaths, give us a call. Until then, you are just being a shrill idiot.

        • http://gene-poole.tumblr.com Gene Poole

          Since we aren’t talking about murder or anything that actually harms anyone

          censorship is harmful. It violates the public’s right to free speech. It’s harmful.

        • GreenPirate

          Sup Gene Poole.

          There is no way to ever know the extend of harm done by censorship. There is no way of knowing what crucial solutions, innovations, creation and education are lost to censorship.

        • http://gene-poole.tumblr.com Gene Poole

          You’re right. By its very nature, there is no way of knowing the final tally of the harm done and opportunities lost due to censorship. I would posit that in a free and open democratic society, any at all is an intolerable amount.

          Censorship is an intolerable action. The only tolerable solution to intolerable speech, is simply more speech. That is how a democracy operates.

        • FreeBSD

          the public has a right to free speech? so you think it is OK for a person to shout “Fire, Fire!” in a crowded theater? triggering a stampede and causing death & injury?

        • http://gene-poole.tumblr.com Gene Poole

          I am so glad you used this example :D

          Yes. I do agree with the public’s right to shout “Fire! Fire!” in a crowded theatre.

          http://www.popehat.com/?s=crowded+theatre

          “People tend to cite the “fire in a crowded theater” quote for two reasons, both bolstered by Holmes’ fame. First, they trot out the Holmes quote for the proposition that not all speech is protected by the First Amendment. But this is not in dispute. Saying it is not an apt or persuasive argument for the proposition that some particular speech is unprotected, any more than saying “well, some speech is protected by the First Amendment” is a persuasive argument to the contrary. Second, people tend to cite Holmes to imply that there is some undisclosed legal authority showing that the speech they are criticizing is not protected by the First Amendment.”

          Just because it’s a common phrase does not mean that it’s valid ground to stand on. The concept you’re describing was utilized to suppress someone’s right to distribute pamphlets advocating against conscription, and the decision that the “fire in a crowded theatre” argument was used in favour of was also overturned over 50 years ago specifically because it was a violation of people’s rights to freedom of speech.

          Certainly, if there is a fire in a crowded theatre, one should absolutely make people aware. Are you advocating “every man for himself” when the theatre is on fire, and quietly making your way out on your own, because otherwise someone might get trampled, so let’s let them worry about it on their own and quite possibly let the entire audience burn to death? I’d say given the choice, sharing the knowledge with my fellow man stands a much greater chance to incur less death.

          Or do you mean falsely shouting fire in a crowded theatre, causing a stampede that killed people needlessly? While certainly there are certain situations in which the greater good would be more important than the right to freedom of speech (and this concept pains me to even agree with) I do not think it is a valid argument in favour of acceptance of suppression of any free speech. Indeed, american courts have found this to be the case time and time again, even when discussing hate speech that can potentially incite violence, it is still constitutionally protected. As it should be.

          There is no valid argument that freedom of speech should not be allowed; in fact enforced. Anything else is a slippery slope towards repression, and this is something that the forefathers recognized when writing the constitution, which is why it’s enshrined therein. Certainly without freedom of speech America would never have become the land of the free.

          /patriotic bullshit. My point is that there is no argument that one can make that would ever convince me that censorship is a favourable tactic, in any situation.

        • Guest321

          So what you are saying is that Freedom of Speech is a meaningless piece of crap and you see no harm in corporate entities trying to take that right away from us just because nobody is getting murdered? Bravo! Why don’t you go live in North Korea, the regime there would love to have model citizens like you Bobby, who can kiss their leader’s ass all day long with a happy face.

        • bobmail

          “So what you are saying is that Freedom of Speech is a meaningless piece of crap and you see no harm in corporate entities trying to take that right away from us just because nobody is getting murdered?”

          No, nice to see you can’t read and insist on coloring other people’s comments with your slanted world view.

          Your first amendment rights end at my nose. That is to say that your rights to free speech exist providing they don’t infringe on the rights of others. It’s not some sort of trump card that allows you to ignore everyone else’s rights.

          One day when you grow up, you might understand.

          As for your North Korean comments, all I can say is fuck off. You are an idiot.

        • Scary_Devil_Monastery

          “That is to say that your rights to free speech exist providing they don’t infringe on the rights of others.”

          Wrong. As you would know had you any inkling of what constitutes a “right” and what constitutes as a “privilege”.

          Free speech is a right. It can only conflict with other rights. It is not revocable.

          Copyright is not a right, but a revocable privilege. And this holds true for most national constitutions as well as the human rights declaration.

          And as usual, lacking a logical or factual basis you resort to calling people “idiots” in the hopes it will magically cause the acute deficiency of your argument to go away.

        • http://gene-poole.tumblr.com Gene Poole

          Your first amendment rights end at my nose. That is to say that your rights to free speech exist providing they don’t infringe on the rights of others.

          This is absolutely correct, in as far as you go. The unwritten undertone, however, that copyright is one of these rights that you’re speaking of, is not.

          I fully expect you to ignore this, because your choices are a) argue that you weren’t equating copyright as standing on the same ground as everyone’s rights and freedoms (which you will never do) or b) try to justify that in fact copyright is in fact a right (and not the restriction on rights of property that everyone already knows it is). I don’t expect you to go this route either, though admittedly I’m unsure, based on the completely retarded holes you’ve dug for yourself in the past, that you could have avoided simply by shutting up. So I may be surprised.

          I do note that again, when you have no ground to actually stand on, you take the route of ad hominem attacks. Duly noted, at least you’re consistent. Carry on.

        • ThumbsUpThumbsDown

          Really nasty ad hominims here posing as supreme wisdom. Are you able to do better?

        • BuddhaFacePalmed

          Sure, being falsely called out by a copyright troll for downloading illegal porn isn’t harmful to one’s job , reputation nor his family.

          Don’t forget, according to DMCA as it is today, as long a person sends a notice that someone is allegedly infringing (Note that they don’t have to prove anything), any media you put up on the web gets taken down immediately by both Google and Youtube.

          So, to you, my young, uneducated troll, it means I can send a DMCA notice to anyone about anything at all at no cost, no consequences to shut it down. On the other end, if I receive a DMCA notice, I have to jump through burning hoops of bureaucracy before I can get my stuff online again. And the best part is, all they have to do to counter this is to send another DMCA notice at no extra charge.

          Every comment you’ve made is a meaningless piece of crap, trying to justify corporation greed. Why do I have to call you when we already have unlawful detentions, censorship, and cruel and unusal punishments? When society starts to rise against the tyranny of corporations, give us a call. Until then, you might want a pay-rise beyond getting sodomised from corporation thugs

        • Scary_Devil_Monastery

          “When copyright starts causing mass deaths, give us a call. Until then, you are just being a shrill idiot.”

          Then prove to us infringement causes harm?

          Ah, one standard for yourself, another for other people.

          That said, anyone believing it “does no harm” when censorship is automatically implemented but free speech has to be continually fought for has a very high deficiency of common logic.

          I’m not sure about copyright, but intellectual property as a concept has indeed caused mass deaths. More than the second world war can be held accountable for, just looking at what patent costs of medicine brings in the third world.

        • ThumbsUpThumbsDown

          These are the reasons why we need to abolish Copyright Law rather than modify it……….

        • Kiesha

          well then you could say then softwear error sorry too bad it removed all files on a website as it looks like here, and then just be get out of jail free. There has to be an open investigation each time to see what went wrong and how to correct it so it doesn’t happen again instead of too bad i got get out of jail free card….

      • Guest

        This is why the law should step in, instead of making up retarded bullshit to kill the internet like SOPA or ACTA governments should be trying to help society.
        But right now we see a dead end.
        Copyright holders send thousands of bullshit notices and the cloud services have no options, they have to take them all down because manually checking every one would be impossible ( they are worse than spam) and not taking them down would mean being sued by greedy vultures like Robert King and his lackeys.
        The blacklist idea is good.

        Cloud services should have that option and if the copyright holders want to dispute their black list status, they should have an option as well.
        But with the current system everyone gets screwed.

    • Guest

      Charge “rightsholders” a $25 processing fee for filing a DMCA.

      Charge them $2,500 for filing a bogus DMCA.

      Problem solved over night.

      Also, I think Mega-search is some kind of honeypot that just automatically sends takedowns for anything anybody lists on it. Certainly seems like it.

      • Windlasher

        Might work, but I get the feeling that Thousands of Torrenters would jump on that by uploading thousands of large files with the names of popular torrents which could be funny as hell. Probably get a lot less takedown notices if you had to put down a deposit, which is forfeit if it turns out its not the right file.

      • GreenPirate

        That’s a great idea.

      • quadderp

        the idea comes to mind – could a filehoster have its primary business model on MAKING money from charging for DMCA requests? particularly bogus ones, surely if they get a few hits of 2.5$ every so often would be enough to at least scrape by with out needing advert revenue…

        • bobmail

          In the US you cannot charge for processing such a request, it’s a legal notice, not optional reading material.

        • Josh

          The US does not own the world. Mega doesn’t even need to follow DMCA takedowns.

        • lll

          mega and megaupload were not hosted or based in us so really they could charge whatever they wanted, not even sure why they even go by dmca as that did them alot of good with megaupload and they still got raided….
          If I was kim dot com i would say fuck dmca as it doesn’t work and this is further proof and then say i made a mistake by removing this but i am no longer going to go by dmca as i am not in america mother fuckers

      • BuddhaFacePalmed

        Not sure that will work though. (Playing the devil’s advocate here). How about genuine indie artists who get ripped off by corporation-sponsored karoke singers? They may not be able to afford sending the higher processing fee and may lose in a lengthy court battle against these mega-corporations.

        • ForGodsSake

          they could do a deposit fee for anoyone sending in copyright notices. if your first batch of notices come back as invalid, all of your notices are removed and your fee is kept. if the notices are valid, your deposit is returned to you.

      • DT

        agreed

      • DT

        agreed

      • NG

        Pay $25 every time you need to address a pirate?!?!

        FFS man, small content producers are the ones that can’t afford that, but really need to take stuff down. And one link can turn into a few thousand in minutes or hours. Thanks for a very stupid idea.

        • ForGodsSake

          the general idea is still a very good one. you could instead pay a $25 deposit that would allow you to report up to 50 links. if your reports are valid, your deposit is returned to you. if not, the $25 deposit is kept.

    • Ophelia Millais

      These are not DMCA takedowns. They’re outsourced TOS enforcement.

      • ThumbsUpThumbsDown

        Very important distinction….. What must amaze us is that Copyright Holders have been able to keep such abuses mired in the lower courts for so long……

    • lll

      no way it should work, sorry we are not on us soil, do not use us servers, and last time we complied we got raided, or just take the case as “sorry if u look at history of a previous company who complied, all their assets were stollen and money and etc. I am not located in us so dmca does not apply where i reside etc…

    • bobmail

      I go for the third choice here: I think Dotcom is purposely and maliciously attacking his own site and fucking it up, with the intent of getting all the kiddies here to stand behind him against the injustice.

      Fat Kim plays you morons like a fiddle.

      • GreenPirate

        You mad, bro?

      • Guest

        Right, because Dotcom asked GEMA to takedown his video for songs that they clearly didn’t own.

        Still got that Robert King jizz running down your face I see, bobby.

      • BallBiter

        lol, well true or not, wern’t most people who read this blog already standing being him and against mafiaa with some exceptions such as yourself and othter mafiaa shills so If I am right then he would not have to “:get him on his side”lol

  • Aleister

    It’s really no different from other cloud hosting services. None of them check the files that get reported. Especially not the big sites.

  • anonymous

    it could be a security issue and the site is not as secure as Dotcom portrayed and it has been hacked. it could be that some kind soul has managed to alter the take down process. whatever the problem is, it needs sorting toute suite. after the disaster last year, he dont need another fuck up with the new site. if it proves to be something the US is doing, either the government or the entertainment industries, it shows how far they will go to have their way

  • AntiCloud

    The cloud is such a step backwards technologically. Bittorrent and P2P wouldn’t exist otherwise, and here’s the world trying to centralize everything.

    It’s like going back to the mainframe 40 years later.

    • Christopher Kidwell

      Anti-cloud, they are not trying to centralize everything. The servers that these things are stored on are all over the world and there is redundancy, which makes it near impossible to ‘lose’ things today.

      • Derric Atzrott

        I think though he meant the delegation of control of the file to a single authority though.

        Mainframes introduce a single point of failure. Decentralized systems such as Freenet don’t have this problem.

        Speaking of… why does no one use Freenet to share files? It seems like the most censorship resistant way.

        • http://blog.ssokolow.com ssokolow

          Last time I tried it, it was trickier to set up than other options and, since the indexes were stored within Freenet, the latency was horrendous even to just find things to download.

          …not to mention the whole “critical mass” issue. When I tried it, it was mainly niche content and people using it for the novelty.

        • Christopher Kidwell

          You kidding? Freenet is pretty damned fast from what I have seen, downloading the files I need within a few minutes just like Bittorrent does.

        • http://blog.ssokolow.com ssokolow

          Latency, not throughput.

          Downloads were fast when I tried it a couple of years ago, but it could take up to a minute to start actually transferring when I clicked a link… even if that was the “next page” link for an index hosted within Freenet itself.

      • justme

        The items that were taken down are lost. Redundancy that. This is a step backwords. Better off storing stuff on own drives. Why waste money with cloud storage. It does nothing for keeping our files accessable. P2P is the way to go.

        • http://twitter.com/MikuzDev Jan Mikael Lindlöf

          Dropbox keeps your files synched. Decentralize that :)
          Different cloud storages offer different kind of conveniencies. You could set up a personal Dropbox server but that’s a blocker for most Dropbox users.

          Btw, isn’t Bittorrent network technically a cloud?

        • GreenPirate

          Nope. Decentralization applies not only to the technology, but also to the gatekeeper(s) of your data.

      • Somebody_Else

        It’s similar to the days of big iron in that your computer is becoming a terminal. It doesn’t store your stuff. Instead, that’s been pushed out to another system somewhere else. To the end user, it doesn’t matter if that’s one big server in the backroom, or a million little servers all over the world. If anything interrupts his terminals connection to the ‘server’, he has access to nothing.

        It makes sense for some things to be remotely accessed, and others to be local only. This fad where everyone is trying to push everything into the ‘cloud’ is not a good policy.

    • marxmarv

      Distributed vs. centralized is just a continuum of fads, like fitted vs. loose pants. Before Teh Cloud there was the offline client. Before the Windows PC there was the diskless workstation. Ever thus with fashion, Lebowski.

    • IBM4Life

      You never heard of mainframes having to run anti-virus software! ;)

  • cupid_stunt

    am i the only one who smells something? goodbye Mega, it was nice knowing you, but then again, two accounts should do the trick, and yet, what with difficulty i had opening the first one i don’t know

  • http://twitter.com/JerkfaceMcGee Jerkface McGee

    I do think it is a rogue “rightsholder” who auto-patrols the mega-search site sending out claims to content they don’t even own, or some other troll nonetheless. Regardless, I’m guessing MEGA is pulling a YouTube and swiftly disabling anything that gets a DMCA notice without any actual humans intervening.

    • Derric Atzrott

      I hope Kim Dotcom holds them to their oath “that the information contained in the notification is accurate”.

      • Guest

        he doesn’t care about anything but money! nice facade he got there.. but his actions speak louder than his easy words

        don’t believe in him

      • Ophelia Millais

        Unfortunately, these takedowns aren’t made under the auspices of the DMCA. They are just enforcement of Mega’s terms of service, outsourced to agents of the copyright owners.

  • Pingback: In the News.. | TorGuard.net Blog - Anonymous VPN Services

  • Sinner

    We were promised that we will have all the authority to the files. but now they are deleting files on there own. If they don’t have the key they are not able to delete the files can’t even know there names so if we are not able to share files with keys (Publicly), should we do? Make private communities and share links or make an backup account and store files on cloud but this may ban your account. How can we make best use of that.?
    Any Suggestions! reply
    :)

    • spidey

      here is a suggestion!! Stop being a tight assed cunt and buy your shit you fucking low life bit of dog shit. Fucking hate thieves. There is nothing worse than a fucking toerag thief.
      FUCKYALL your friendly neighborhood spiderman

      • fauxe

        Hows that welfare money treating you spidey?

      • 2013sUxAlready

        refer to lagoogy’s repliers you fascist wannabe scumbag asskisser.

      • djnforce9

        Apparently you don’t even know how to READ. This concerns the taking down of “legal” files without any evidence that the DMCA notices were verified as legitimate because if they were, only the actual offending files would be taken down.

    • Derric Atzrott

      They can still delete files without the key.

      Encryption works to obscure and possibly secure the content of a file not to protect it. A good way to think of it would be like this: If you and I came up with a secret language we used for messages, the postman could still burn the letters even if he couldn’t read them.

      When you share the link to the file online though, you are also most likely going to publish the encryption key with it. If you do not, those who want to legitimately download the file will be unable to open it (as it is still encrypted). The act of publishing the keys though, of course, gives MEGA (or whoever else happens to see the keys, such as a copyright holder) the ability to open the file as well.

      I think private communities are likely the only good solution to this.

  • U-95

    Nothing new. They know they’re clossely watched by the MAFIAA and have to appear as good guys. Alas, it was clear that when someone released on the net a download link and the key this kind of thing would happen.

    Perhaps the bogus takedown notices come from “robots” as happens with other places. Or, likely, come from Robert King

  • http://techfleece.com/ Richard Gailey

    This happened to me last night. I was writing an article/tutorial on MEGA-Search.me and used a test file (just an image that I manipulated using Fractalius) to show users how the crowdsourced search engine works. I checked the link about an hour later only to find that it had been removed. I them received an email from MEGA regarding a Take Down notice on the file along with a link to it. I couldn’t check the file that the link pointed to due to it having been removed.

    I really hope that MEGA are actually checking for the validity of these Take Down notices as it is so open for abuse like this, that the service is pretty much useless.

    I get the fact that Kim and co want to be seen to be abiding by the rule of the law, but you HAVE to at least check the bloody files in the first place to see if they are in-fact infringing.

    • Derric Atzrott

      I thought the DMCA said they had to take it down immediately until a counter notice was filed.

      What I hope Mr. Dotcom does is hold these people accountable for prejury. If he is going to play by the rules, they should as well.

      • Ophelia Millais

        Ernesto was incorrect when he assumed the Mega takedowns are under the auspices of the DMCA; it’s outsourced TOS enforcement. The screenshot confirms.

        The major content hosting services have set up tools for outside parties to request and/or invoke takedowns en masse, with no little or no review. Outsourcing their TOS enforcement like this is essentially doing favors for the mafia so there won’t be any “trouble”. And the mafia, in turn, relies on somewhat shady outside companies to do the actual work, which makes it uncertain who’s responsible for false takedowns and what can be done about it.

        It’s a really clever system, in its deviousness. Mega may lose some business due to the false takedowns, but proving the connection will be hard, and to recover damages would require taking these shitbags to court in their own countries; not likely to happen. This is what happens when you make a deal with a content industry which believes it has no interest in allowing your business to operate at all.

        Even if the Mega cases were DMCA takedowns, Eric Goldman follows DMCA cases and has come to the conclusion that 17 USC 512(f) is “dead”. It has no teeth, and case law has proven that it’s virtually impossible to punish false takedowns.

        • bobmail

          ” 17 USC 512(f) is “dead” ”

          It’s not dead, it’s that the letter of the law is VERY stringent, requiring that the specific bad faith action be shown. Not the feeling of it, not the thought of it, but actual hard knowledge of bad faith intent to file a defective or illegal notice.

          The standard is high, the amount of knowledge is low, the chance that they can reach the standard set is about nil.

          From what I have seen, most “false” takedown notices are either misunderstandings (someone else gave them the right to use X) or are against what MAY be considered fair use (legal grey area, the DMCA notice is not bad faith here, as fair use is an asserted right under copyright), or a misunderstanding as to the content use.

          There are very, very few blatantly and intentionally false notices out there. Even the “using copyright to censor” claims generally have a basis in valid copyright law.

        • PenzancePeer

          In Criminal Law, Recklessness can be so persistent, or frequent that it becomes Criminal. I imagine the same would hold for Civil Law, where Mistakes could become so numerous as to become Bad Faith ?

        • bobmail

          No, read the law. Each DMCA notice is treated on an individual case basis. There is no provision to use any “collectivity” of action towards proving bad faith, it’s on each individual notice.

        • BuddhaFacePalmed

          So, if I had a automated system that sends DMCA notice on a regular basis to every media file that contained the words Hansel & Gretel, I would have effectively censored the internet from both the fairy tale of Hansel & Gretel and the 2013 film Hasel & Gretel. And I wouldn’t be prosecuted because I was trying to get rid of pirated versions of Hansel & Gretel.

          Copyright Logic… Seems legit D:

        • http://gene-poole.tumblr.com Gene Poole

          There’s existing precedence in tort law for proving bad faith. The covenant of good faith and fair dealing is a standard in contract law, and certainly something that those submitting dmca requests can be held accountable under.

          I would say that, given the organizations being made aware of the broad overreach that automatic dmca submissions have been proven to have, as well as the censorship that such claims have (inadvertently, at this time) caused; that being aware of these facts and nonetheless continuing to submit these dmca complaints because it gives them the security of plausible deniability for intent, a case could certainly be made for bad faith based upon existing tort law. The strings are there, there just needs to be a lawyer willing to step forward and make the argument. They can’t hide behind thta excuse forever.

        • Ophelia Millais

          The high standard for bad faith is a big part of the problem, but so is the limitation of damages to actual damages. So my kid dancing to Prince doesn’t get to be on YouTube. How much is that worth? Probably not much. As a free-speech and fair-use issue, maybe it’s worth a lot in principle…but dollar-wise, not so much. But I don’t think the people who drafted the DMCA—and I think we know who that is—weren’t about to give that part of the law enough bite that they’d ever see it used against them in their copyright enforcement efforts.

          That said, I agree that there are probably not that many deliberately false notices. It’s more just that the notices are careless, reckless even. There’s always a degree of collateral damage, and even if it’s very small, percentage-wise, it adds up to a lot of pissed-off people…people who have no recourse, no remedy or relief available to them. Same goes for the non-DMCA-based TOS enforcement like Mega is doing.

          Even properly licensed material gets taken down, as the Mega example and countless YouTube examples show. The uploader has to go through a back-and-forth with the copyright claimant and the service provider before being whitelisted, and that only happens at the content owner’s discretion (whereas the whole point of fair use is that it’s not their call). There are already cases where rights changed hands and previously whitelisted content got taken down by the new owners. Basically, if you have a fair-use or licensed content situation, you have to fight to keep the content online, and it could still go down at any time. 17 USC 512(f) is the only thing that even had potential to discourage these reckless takedowns, but as we have seen, it’s useless; recklessness, even with knowledge, isn’t the same thing as deliberate bad faith. This has to change.

      • ScrewEwe2

        I could be wrong, but I think the only time “perjury” comes into play is when you are in a court of law and have been sworn to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help you, in the name of the fairy-tale guy in the sky. I don’t think “prejury” matters.

  • Jerky_san

    Makes you wonder if this isn’t something good for Mega.. technically submitting DMCA’s that aren’t actually true is purgery under US law.. Perhaps compiling a list to use to sue with? And By “good” i mean that they are letting these people do what they please at first to show that they are rouge..

    • Ophelia Millais

      These takedowns aren’t made under the auspices of the DMCA. They are just enforcement of Mega’s terms of service, outsourced to agents of the copyright owners. The DMCA doesn’t apply.

  • riceexperiment

    You do all realise that all this file sharing bullshit is going to come to an end!!! There is no way you are ever going to win against goverments….EVER! If you think they don’t understand what is going on with vpn etc then you are deluding yourself. All this is just moves on a chessboard and once you ppl do the logical next step to their action you are being lead down a path. It is all a game and you will lose.
    Look at life in general….The goverments run the fucking show and it will be the same here.
    All this just to save a few pounds…. I could not be fucking arsed to be honest. There is something to be said about being honest.. Rice experiment anyone???? And if you don’t know what that means then you are in for a few life shocks with your current behavior model.

    • Anyone

      I’m share my files very honestly

      paying for stuff that is available for free is not being honest, it’s being stupid

    • 2013sUxAlready

      Oh no the big man is going to bring us all down… for the sake of the children xD STFU Troll!

    • Malt

      Last i checked , governments still cant do about shit about drugs and hey about people shooting around like they are in a party ..

      Just to counter your bullshit reply you may have

      Punishing after the damage done wont undo the damage ..

      Those are some real life issues to deal with ..

    • TempleNewsam

      So you think the entire internet is open, visible and susceptible to government.
      You are a pretty dumb fuck.

    • no@no.no

      We’ve been winning now for 2 decades silly.

  • Anyone

    so it seems Mega is shooting itself in the foot
    it files are deleted so quickly, what’s the use of it?

    • http://www.facebook.com/hector.r.barbossa Hector Rainbow Barbossa

      In theory, it should still be good eg for posting android roms and linking from the XDA developers forums. On the other hand if someone then posts all those links on a site mega doesn’t approve of …. well, they really are shooting themselves in the foot I guess.

  • Pingback: Dotcom’s Mega Removes Legal Files Citing Bogus DMCA Requests | We R Pirates

  • Anon

    For the last time, folks: DMCA notices should NEVER be accepted by
    email, but by MAIL, fax… if you do accept things that are sent in an
    easy way you will get a lot of abuse. When are you going to learn such a basic thing about censorship?
    Perhaps never, since you only care about your ass?

    • Anon

      One more thing: you could use a software (ever heard of OCR?) to process those requests sent by mail/FAX… with some form of identification, which you can’t have in fake EMAILS sent by random people/organizations. Kim, are you listening, honey? Because if you are, either you are too dumb, lazy, or perhaps working for the same people that are trying to destroy you. Can someone help me figure out what alternative is right? I think all of them.

      • Anon

        For the record, look at this:

        http://torrentfreak.com/google-removed-50-million-pirate-search-results-this-year-121228/

        *********
        Over the past year copyright holders have asked Google to remove 51,395,353 links to infringing webpages, a dramatic surge compared to previous years. The search giant is currently processing half a million “infringing” links per day, and this number is increasing week after week. At the same time, Hollywood and the major record labels want Google to increase its anti-piracy efforts.
        *********

        Do you honestly believe GOOGLE search engine is useful anymore? I don’t. Of course they will do any kind of censorship if it suits them, they work proactively with all kinds of companies to opress their users. Is it because the law demands them to do it? You could argue that, but the fact remains Google makes a lot easier for these people. Why? Because they are desperate for money (something I wish people would stop giving to them for good).

        And remember: there’s also something called DMCA Counter-Notice. You can remove anything you like, but if a DMCA Counter-Notice is filled, you have to reinstate that content.

        However, even Google refuses to do that if it doesn’t suit them. What about Mega? Will they offer this option for anyone, and claim “we may reinstate at our discretion” as well? Will they require users with deleted contents to show some proof the content belongs to them, and if we quote some fair-use law, will they ignore as well?

        I could go on, on and on, but I think you can see how the law only works one-way, and it’s only created with one goal in mind: to commit all kinds of tyranny.

        But what good are so many laws, corrupt judges and justice systems, if the people who are threatened by them do not comply, even if they can find another way to prevent lots of abuses, uh?

        People like Kim Dotcom are the ones who dig their own graves.

        • cupid stunt

          they remove the link, but the page and file are still there. i find them by using dmca as a search engine. it is better than google and at least i know the files are legit he he. dumbo’s that they are

        • ScrewEwe2

          “Do you honestly believe GOOGLE search engine is useful anymore?” As a general search engine, hell yes. As a torrent search engine, not so much, that’s why I use torrent indexer sites like TPB, etc., instead.

        • Anyone

          it’s just a matter of time until DMCA requires them to remove “non piracy” links as well

          it’s a slippery slope

  • Ihavenoideawhatimdoingrightnow

    -.- Reupload with false title (probably in parts like in the good ol’ days) and repost the real file name on your private site if you want to share “hot” stuff. Probably not tell shit about anything on that site and rely on free accounts to temporarily overcome the takedown frenzy… nothing new here.

    Oh wait we are talking about PUBLIC links… no wonder with all these anti privacy fags out there that are in fear of losing their jobs. They have enough time on their hand to mow down public indexing sites no? No surprise as the indutry is trying everything to prevent MEGA from blowing up in their face.

  • Windlasher

    They are so screwing with him. Nothing of interest is available for download. He needs to have whomever is sending the notices verify who they are and the rights to the files before takedown.

  • anonymous

    in all honesty, if there is a way legal or not, openly or subversively, for Dotcom to be stopped from being successful with this new site, after having the old one shut down, the entertainment industries and/or the USA government is going to use it. just like TPB 4, fighting back is not allowed. moving things to keep them running is even less allowed. starting again from scratch is so fucking not allowed, it’s untrue! everyone everywhere is supposed to roll over, curl into a ball of total servitude as soon as the USA says or does something (that only benefits itself or it’s businesses, screwing everyone else in the process!). they think and act as if they are in complete control of everything. they need to be made to understand, that is not the case. countries that keep complying with the USA demands are gonna regret it sooner or later!

  • TempleNewsam

    So we know Dotcom is the lazy useless fat faced fuck we believed he was.

    • 2013sUxAlready

      Yo so funny… did your friends from *insert anti-piracy group* vote you up ? Or wass somebody so butthurt his uploads got wasted?

      • Guest

        what are you? MAFIAA bitch supporting censorship
        shut your mouth

        • 2013WTF?

          Fuck is your problem?

  • Amused

    The MAFIAA didn’t go to all that bother shutting Mega down just to let it spring back up again only a year later. If they can’t stop Kim Dotcom from running the service, then they’ll do anything they can to render it useless and leave it that nobody will want to use it. Why upload files to a service where the said files will probably be inaccessible within a very short time?
    The Mega brand was destroyed a year ago. It will never be allowed to return. It was game over for Mega when it was raided.

    • 2013rocks4eva

      Or not.

  • kings121

    Kim dotcom and the new mega is now a big squeeze for DMCA…..could kim be cited for copyrights infringement if he had named the site the new california oranges?!!

  • cupid stunt

    this is all so one sided? as much as i don’t like or agree with KD i do side with him on this one. some Chinese officials have been stealing passes and government information via snooping, i do wonder if they could just send a few of these computer wizards to sort these take downs out, it is just not fair, the more i read about it the less i dislike KD, really

  • Andrew Lee

    There is most likely another motive to the harsh copyright enforcement on legal files. It might burn Mega in the end or it could wake people up to see just how broke this shitty copyright system really is.

    In any case it’s going to open a lot of eyes before it’s all said and done. I think it’s good for people to see just how fucked up shit really is. I feel bad for the victims but hopefully in the end it will not be in vain.

    I’ve said before there is zero repercussions for sending false DCMA request. Sadly it looks like I’m right which is no surprise to me at least. When it comes time to pick a side for everyone and don’t kid yourself it’s coming where will you stand?

    Hopefully people wake up before it’s a felony to play the music with your car windows down.

  • http://creamneuron.tumblr.com/ creamneuron

    I’m sure Kim has made a good deal with the Mafiaa before the launch. now he is delivering.

    I will wait patiently for the first reports of people who get mail from lawyers with a huge bill.

    He did that before, and he was honest about it, being his realization of a business-model. He sold hackers, phreakers, carders and everyone else who trusted him. He will fuck everyone of you in the ass, as long as he gets paid for it.

    Damn, i don’t get it why everyone outside germany does not know shit about this guy and believes he is the internet hero of tomorow.

    • 2013sUxAlready

      I know… but I don’t care. I want him to spread that shit wide open and bring to light or better yet public attention how fucked up media companies have corrupted our laws to their benefits. I dont give a rats ass about Kims business model (there are hundreds of alternatives) and if he goes down with it in the end or causes another public cataclysm (confiscated servers with millions of legitimate files). People need to see the evil behind the industry and expect certain risks. Another failure on his part and we can expect this guy to fade away quicker than MEGA reappeared. Only thing he can do now is to gather his forces and kick the shit out of the people responsible for Megauploads death. Then we can maybe come to pick apart the pieces. Would you prefer other filelockers just succumb to the big USAholes regime and fold like Rapidshare? or better yet: US having a monopoly on file lockers, media hosters and streaming services… fuck that.
      I’m not saying he is the Piracy messiah other freetards expect him to be (that is seriously idiotic considering his past) but at least he puts up a fight about the Megaupload fiasco.

      • http://creamneuron.tumblr.com/ creamneuron

        Yes, for that he could be usefull. but sometimes i fear, that he even would sell the whole cause, if he gets a good enough price. But who knows, maybe he likes his role as hero so much…

        • 2013sUxAlready

          “that he even would sell the whole cause”

          seems as he did that already…

          https://mega.co.nz/#blog_5

          as said by Ophelia Millais above these arent DMCAs these are remote TOS enforcement stemming from MEGA itself. Like killing public indexing sites that don’t have propoer takedown protocols and DMCA agents in place.To sum it up: MEGA =/= MEGA Share. No intent on playing ball.

          There ya go Kimmy.

          disqus is fucking up for me a lot lately. and I don’t see all teh replies especially did not catch the recent news…

  • Byte Master

    WTF Dotcom???

    The problem with the DMCA (US-jurisdiction, not NZ-jurisdiction) is that as long as you have a good faith belief you are the, or representing the, rightsholder of the work you claim is being infringed, you’re scott free.

    THERE IS NO NEED TO HAVE A GOOD FAITH BELIEF THAT THE FILE ASKED TO BE TAKEN DOWN IS INFRINGING ON SAID WORK and what is worse: THERE IS NO PENALTY.

    Kim Doctom can and should of course be a “good corporate citizen”… but HE SHOULD PENALIZE BOGUS TAKEDOWNS!

    There is nothing in the DMCA that prevents you from doing this.

    • Ophelia Millais

      You’re absolutely right about this, but these aren’t DMCA requests. Ernesto characterized them as such by mistake. They’re requests made for Mega to enforce its own TOS.

      Aside from the fact that Mega’s not US-based, the DMCA doesn’t apply to this custom takedown system, so the DMCA’s takedown procedure can be ignored. It doesn’t guarantee Mega won’t get sued or charged with criminal infringement, but it helps because they’re making an effort.

      Unfortunately, it also means the copyright owners get to be the gatekeepers, and they have no incentive whatsoever to avoid false takedowns or to do anything else that would help keep Mega in business.

      • Andrew me

        But if they take down any material that they do not own the copyright to surely they are in breech of some law, i mean is there not something about free speech where you can distribute your own material and have no interference. I think Kim is just trying to protect himself but he is once again making it a case where the users of his system are losing access to their works their copyrighted goods that they are allowing others to download free of charge.
        I wish we could see the mpaa taken to court but they have the court in their pocket so it would have to be a court outside of America and possibly not a country that is an American ally.

        But even saying that Kim has not come out and let people know why they are losing access to their files yet again.

        • Byte Master

          It’s obvious why they are losing access to their files: someone just says that file such-an-such infringes on their copyright (or those who they represent).

          The problem not even that they must have nice big blue eyes and MEGA believes them on their word.

          The problem is that one MEGA user after the other comes back and complains a perfectly legal file has been deleted (e.g. “Mr.President.mp3″), and absolutely nothing is happening to the person(s) sending those requests.

          As Ophelia Millais has been explaining: it’s NOT the DMCA, it’s MEGA’s own TOS, so it should be an easy fix: after x number of takedown requests that have been disputed in y period of time, requester is going to have explain how the file infringes on the copyright at issue.

  • http://twitter.com/Anime4PSP Anime 4 PSP

    I know that lots will disagree with me, but imo, Kim Dotcom is full of shit. He do not care about you, about promises he made and broke, he just cares about money and his own safety. He talks all big about fighting copyright extremism and yet we see this. Totally full of shit

  • cgimusic

    They really need a bit more transparency. Maybe they can’t fine copyright holders that issue false notices but they could at least shame them by stating who made the claim.

  • http://profile.typepad.com/6p0120a5509de8970c ミッコ

    “En raison d’un script développé par Mega pour supprimer l’intégralité des fichiers indexés sur Mega-search, le moteur est momentanément indisponible. Une solution pour palier à ce problème sera apportée d’ici peu.”

    ke?

    • cupid stunt

      yep i got that too

    • ScrewEwe2

      “Due to a script developed by Mega to delete all files indexed on Mega-search, the engine is temporarily unavailable. A solution to solve this problem will be remedied soon.”

  • thatstuffisstrongdude

    “Interestingly, this mass removal of files appears to contradict Kim Dotcom’s statement earlier today that Mega receives just 50 DMCA takedown requests per day, unless of course there is additional proactive work underway.”

    Dotcom lied.

    • 2013rocks4eva

      Or didn’t.

  • knglerxst

    Is this really that surprising? Profit is king in this system. It’s not this company or that company, but the system itself. It’s like if you’re in a room that’s leaking and you try to solve the problem by getting buckets to catch the water. That will never work because there’s a problem with the structure of the room itself.

  • Guest

    And this is why copyright takedown notices should have a cost.
    Make it an automated 1$ to the holder’s credit card at least.

    • Guest

      But surely if you can upload or email a takedown notice for free that’s a good thing isn’t it? Why should they pay for something they can do / get for free? I thought pirates were all for not paying for stuff. Watever happened to “sharing is caring”?

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=608525922 Ronald MacDonald

    What is needed is a lawyer to launch a class action lawsuit against RIAA, MPAA and like organizations perhaps then they would think twice before launching bogus lawsuits and take down requests.

    • marxmarv

      We have an anti-racketeering law in the US, but since citizens have no standing to bring cases under it, that law is only used as a political weapon.

  • dwpbike

    just give the man time. you expected the opposition to simply roll over?

  • Pingback: MEGA, de nieuwe MegaUpload - Pagina 4

  • Foff

    First there are plenty of of cyber lockers that are not taking down everything instantly. So fuck mega and continue with the other lockers. I thought all the hoopla with encryption would stop take downs but apparently not. Dot com must be dreaming if he thinks a cyber locker that takes down shit within minutes is any good to anyone. Why would I waste my time uploading anything even legal stuff if mega is just going to delete it. Why the fuck is anyone even still using this site? I personally have not even seen a mega link in any of the linking sites I go to so so it seems to me mega is DOA.

  • Ray Carroll

    I’m not really surprised by this. while its fun to see Dotcom being a thorn in the side or our enemy, its really about Dotcom and his bank account. People need to remember, he still has a case against him, everything he’s doing now is just as important as his action before Mega. I like the encryption part, but its the sharing issue that leaves me feeling somewhat alone on that encrypted cloud.

  • ThumbsUpThumbsDown

    DMCA is not EXACTLY the Law that Copyright Holders wanted.

    We should understand the present Mega in THAT light.

    What Corporate Copyright Holders wanted, above all, was a law that did NOT force them to litigate their “rights” against IP users one at a time; but, instead, imposed liability for controlling the infractions of individual users onto the backs of intermediaries capable of impacting and regulating the activities of Users en masse.

    They did NOT get that.

    The leverage that they got instead against intermediaries is everything that we hate about the existing Take-Down Notice System. It was specificly designed to challenge the Safe Harbor qualifications of Intermediaries based on their compliance with Take-down Requests.

    MegaUpload’s historic take down was Copyright Holders best effort at demonstrating the utter destruction of an Intermediary under DMCA principles.

    Enter the new Mega……..

    The New Mega is Kim DotCom’s best effort to demonstrate Inviolable Safe Harbors under DMCA within a platform that absolutely returns liability and responsibility for Copyright infractions (and hence their legal prosecution) onto the backs of Individual Filesharers (with all their political and Constitutional Rights protected).

    Believe it, or not! This is good news.

    It is true that the files of individual Mega Customers will be taken down abusively under the existing implementation of DMCA Take-down Notices; but, it is also true that Individual Citizens are the only remaining power, with the requisite Legal Standing and Political Authority to challenge the abuses of the Copyright Monopolies.

    It is true that perhaps millions of Mega’s Customers will find themselves fighting for their rights in Appellate Courts; and, perhaps will find themselves present in the Legislatures demanding that the DMCA be changed to protect THEM at least as much as it protects Copyright Holders.

    That is ALL GOOD!! Mega should get well deserved credit for anything it can do to encourage that process.

    • Internet_Zen_Master

      Or people could just get fed up with MEGA and stop using it. It hasn’t even been online for a month, so it’s still unknown how well it’ll do in the long run.

      As the Zen Master says, “We’ll see.”

      • ThumbsUpThumbsDown

        Yeah! But let’s distinguish what it is we’re working for: It is a fundamentally fascist process that Corporate Copyright Distributors are working to legitimize within the American and European Democracies.

        Sane Citizens will NOT support that.

        If they do, it will be a universal Human agony.

    • bobmail

      You need to understand that Kim himself is very likely driving all these “notices” as he tries to disrupt his own service to somehow prove that copyright is not working. He is such a sack of shit on things like this, his actions here are pretty transparent and very amusing.

      Basically, he is trying to prove you can’t have a legal service. He is only proving that you can’t have a legal service if all of your customers are pirates.

      • http://gene-poole.tumblr.com Gene Poole

        Your argument that Kim is doing it tells me that the copyright maximalists have something to hide, and need a scapegoat.

        Your arguments are all I need to understand what my party line should be

      • Guest

        His assets are seized or frozen, his previous business has been run to the ground – what kind of nitwit would then have the capital or bravery in order to then selfdestruct his current business venture?

        If what Dotcom is doing is to prove you can’t have a legal service, then guess what – you need to be going after Dropbox and all other similar services, because right now there’s nothing that separates Mega from them. But noooooo, you’re not happy that Dotcom is fulfilling your precious DMCA; you’d rather suck Robert King’s dick and call bluffs that don’t exist. Congratulations on being such a compliant little cocksucker, bobby.

  • Pingback: Mega bloquea cualquier contenido compartido usando la herra... - FayerWayer

  • zippos soppiz

    Remember the picture of DotCom pretending to be the Che Guevara retarded twin? well no more “revolucion” no, no more.

  • Pingback: Mega bloquea cualquier contenido compartido usando la herramienta Mega-search | mundoTEKNO

  • Dude

    On the search site it displays this. Could be possible they deleted everything linked there?

    Due to a script developed by Mega to delete all files indexed Mega-search, the engine is temporarily unavailable. A solution to overcome this problem will be made shortly.

  • Pingback: Mega bloquea cualquier contenido compartido usando la herramienta Mega-search

  • Guest

    Firefox on Linux cannot download files, only upload works.

    MEGA FAIL

    • Dude

      Just download chrome then…

      • Guest

        Why should I? I want to use Firefox… on Linux. I don’t want to use Chrome. I am still waiting for Mega to support Firefox/Linux.

        It’s possible to do anything (upload, browse, etc) except to download because Your browser requires the latest version of Flash to transfer files on MEGA.

        Why is a HTML5 website using Adobe Flash?!

        Yep, it doesn’t make sense!

        MEGA FAIL

      • http://profile.typepad.com/6p0120a5509de8970c ミッコ

        botnet browser

  • NewWorldStoner

    It’s obviously a script or program that has written by someone at the MAFIAA, which frequently reads a list of new links on the mega-search website and for each link it posts a DMCA form on Mega. In turn Mega automatically takes down the subsequent files.

  • Internet_Zen_Master

    Hmmm… I smell I rogue copyright holder playing dirty.

    On the other hand, I’m not exactly a fan of the public-indexing sites for MEGA to begin with. The site’s shtick that it’s big on privacy (however incomplete it might be. That’s what you get for making a site in less than a year and hyping the hell out of it. Absurd expectations. Kinda like Obama’s first election.), so doesn’t having a third-party site that publicly indexes everyones files kinda defeat that purpose?

    Either way, this should be interesting to watch. Excuse me while I go grab some popcorn.

    Will MEGA survive this?

    Zen Master says, “We’ll see.”

  • hmm

    mega site totally pointless waste of a website

  • Andrew me

    If anyone is paying for mega then surely this is against any terms and conditions they signed, yes mega have the right to take down any copyright material but if they do that then surely they should be making damn sure that it is not someone’s work that they have uploaded.

    I suspect that this will cause a lot of damage to Mega and the longer dotcom takes to respond the worse it is going to become. He had a problem with a lot of people losing their files previously which he could not really be held liable for but this is something he is responsible for completely. And if he is trying to deal with the American copyright owners again then he really has not learnt his lesson and this time i will laugh when they detain him if they get the chance.

    • Guest321

      That cheeseball simply does not get it does he? Once bitten and wants to bite the dust a second time. He played ball with the MAFIAA last time. He gave them full takedown control at the backend. The MAFIAA abused his system for years and finally dismantled his business too.

      You would think this nigga would learn once and for all. But nope, he starts another site and straightaway starts drinking the MAFIAA piss, taking down files without verifying anything. He is playing right into their hands again. He screws up once and his business is gone. He still hasn’t come to terms with who his real allies are and who are his enemies.

      It’s all fine and dandy that he wants to be a good corporate citizen but come on mate, you are gotta sit around and not do anything about false notices even though its illegal? Why would I use your service if my legal files aren’t guaranteed against takedowns?

  • nazibill

    Fucking idiots that run megasearch.me. Cheese eating french surrender monkeys

  • Pingback: Mega Faces Problems Over Copyright Takedown Requests | Gizmodo Australia

  • Pingback: Mega ya ha eliminado cientos de archivos por copyright « Blog Personal de Ariel Infante

  • WeariedKeyboardWarrior

    (This Message is very long. Read it all if you can or just skim the importaint parts.)

    Why do they have an indexer in the first place? Was this indexer created by Kim? The Mafiaa? Who? If they really want good privacy and anonymity they should run their website like torcache.Indexes will be the death of them.They should require all files to be encrypted by users on their own computers. Have it run on an encrypted line if necessary If not you can just send it through a transparent line. If your password is good enough it would take an obscene amount of years to break the encryption on the container/containers containing the file and the encryption on the file. I know most of you will think I’m a little extreme with my ideas. We have been at war for years with these scumbags we need to think of extreme methods at this point. Extreme circumstances call for extreme measure. No offense to any of you muslim readers but if a man can lead a group of radicals on a jihad to get a supposed reward of 40 virgins in heaven and they dont even know if the reward is real. Why cant we as pirates fight for a reward that we know is definitely real? We all have to make sacrafices. I dont mean to cause a flamewar.I know most of you have been brazen and courageous in the fight. I commend you. I just want to give a pep talk/ rally cry to try and somewhat motivate.To young pirates that have just joined in the fight. No This fight hasnt just started. Nor will it end quickly.Civil disobedience is the key. We must show these ppl that we are willing to stand up for our beliefs that we are willing to go to jail and/or die if necessary. War is hell their will be casualities.

    • ScrewEwe2

      Better watch what you say, or Bob will call you a child.

  • dave

    it took me a week to be able to get an account. now i cant log in. probably it will take another week. MEGA FAIL AND MEGA WASTING TIME

  • mafiaasucks

    now shows no links and says on megasearch me : http://s3.postimage.org/u278w9j4j/auto.jpg

    • Guest

      The search engine is down…

  • Who

    Y use MEGA? dotcom’s TOS is clearly fucked up. and no one out side NZ has the right to request a take down from the site to start with. the ONLY copyright law that applies is NZ’s “stupid people”

  • bob

    My Penis Smells like rotting crabs.

  • Gmail

    Bitches about the US stopping “innovation” and then says…

    @KimDotcom #Mega policy: NO PROACTIVE COPYRIGHT POLICING OF THE INTERNET. That’s not our job. But linking sites abusing the Mega brand will be blocked.

    Yeah… I smelled it when this shit launched.

    • Dude

      Keep on creating link sites. They can’t stop everything.

    • Guest321

      The US will make Dotcom their bitch a second time. He has clearly forgotten what he got a year ago for playing ball with the MAFIAA and trying to be a “good corporate citizen”.

  • http://www.dickwrench.com/ John Francis

    This was to be expected. Every troll with a internet connection will be sending off notices… I would not be suprised to see a program that just monitors the search engine and automaticall send off a DMCA notice with every new link posted.

    Seeing how Mega claims immunity from DMCA,b y saying it has no idea what is being posted. It will be stuck and have to do the take downs. That is unless it finds a way to make the notifiers PROVE its their copy righted material. As such they might have to actually file a legal notification of owner ship/representation. False notifications would be ignored and this might slow down the trolls.

  • Pingback: Dotcom’s Mega Removes Legal Files Citing Bogus DMCA Requests | The Illuminati

  • Pingback: Apps Lu » Mega search engine listings appear as files get the axe

  • manicmac

    Maybe its just me but I can;t even get mega to load. Or are they blocking the U.S altogether?

  • ThumbsUpThumbsDown

    Today, Copyright Trolls are staking their candy store on the prayer and the hope that Mega Users can be persuaded to abandon ship at the first signs of effective disruption or distress.

    Yet, let’s start with the first principle: Mega’s mere existence is living proof that these Corporate Shills are WRONG!!

    They are WRONG in their presumption that individual citizens have neither stamina or insight.

    They were WRONG when they presumed that they could wipe out Pirate’s Bay by simply blocking access.

    Had they been RIGHT, today Pirate’s Bay would be a figment of our imagination.

    They were WRONG when they assumed that they could take down MegaUpload extra-judicially; and, that there would be NO effective legal or civil opposition.

    Today, they are WRONG when they assume that they will have no effective opposition to the erroneous mass confiscation of the legitimate Private Personal Files of hundreds of millions of Individual Citizens.

    Consider: Mega is in Beta!! We are witnessing its vulnerabilities and imperfections over the space of one month!! We can hope that those imperfections will be corrected over the coming months.

    Yet, the existing Corporate Copyright regime, which both the Pirate’s Bay and Mega oppose, has been WRONG for over two hundred years; and, we can have no hope whatsoever, that any of its attributes will improve in any of our lifetimes. In fact, that regime has NEVER been more WRONG for Democratic Process and for the Constitutional Rights of Individual Citizens than it is today.

    The Question is NOT whether we can tolerate the imperfections of Pirate’s Bay or Mega for Six Months; but, whether we can be compelled by sheer arrogant naked POWER to accept a Perpetual Corporate Domain in Intellectual Property for the rest of Time.

    • Internet_Zen_Master

      Why oh why can’t I give the “IT’S STILL IN BETA!!” part a million upvotes?

      • ThumbsUpThumbsDown

        Why not just give one honest up vote to the part about the Copyright Regime being WRONG for the last two hundred years; and, being toxic to the Civil and Constitutional Rights of Individual Citizens today?

  • JG

    I’d really like to see Kim/Mega, Ubuntu, DecaY and owners of other share-able material that has been unjustly taken down to file a joint suit against whoever is sending out bogus take down notices for material they have no jurisdiction over. Its about time we stop complaining about how many bogus requests get filed with no consequences and actually provide some consequences…

    It’d also be nice to hear how many requests are in fact bogus…. We always hear MAFIAA claiming Google (or whoever) doesn’t do enough to combat piracy, that they continuously send thousands of take down requests per day… If it turns out that half of the requests are bogus then it might we might realize that online piracy isn’t as bad as they want to make it sound….. And that we really don’t need to let them be gate keepers of the internet, and allow them, without any kind of over-sight, to decide who is allowed to have a presence on the web (aka SOPA)….

  • Blood_Fart

    I had my Android files taken out.

  • Pingback: #breakingnews Is Mega using a script to block third-party link-aggregating sites? |

  • DocGerbil100

    “Update: Mega-search.me now blames Mega for taking the links down.”

    Umm… what?! I realise I’m not exactly remotely sober right now, but I, for one, would genuinely appreciate a coherent explanation of just what in the name of fuck is going on here. :P

    • http://www.facebook.com/hector.r.barbossa Hector Rainbow Barbossa

      MEGA are (or were) taking the links down themselves as fast as megasearch.me put them up, with no checking for actual infringement; says so right here https://mega.co.nz/#blog_5

  • frozar

    Problem will always be that copyright trolls have nothing to lose while these sites have everything to lose. At best they lose their business. At worst; freedom.

  • Violated0

    More DMCA havoc then and not such a surprise when DMCA abuse is now getting much worse. I would not even be surprised these day if there was an application out there to fire off millions of false DMCA take-down notices using a website of choice like a machine gun.

    We are in the era of commercial electronic warfare where Mega is clearly a target.

  • Whatever

    If the files are supposedly encrypted, how can Mega verify that a link is potentially infringing?

    • Techanon

      it doesn’t, it just blindly deleted whatever file that was posted on mega-search.me citing some notice.

    • Guest321

      MEGA is not verifying anything. Encryption is just hogwash. That’s what we have been discussing all along. They are taking down anything and everything as soon as notices are sent. Legal files are being taken down and nobody is being held accountable. That’s what this bloody system has come down to.

  • Pingback: Mega Is Already Getting a Ton of Copyright Takedown Requests Because Obviously | Rob's Personal Aggregator

  • Someone

    Looks like its time to boycot mega till they learn not to screw around with people’s stuff… This is ridiculous and stupid..

  • Pingback: DD Tech Solutions | Kim Dotcom puts up $13,500 bounty for first person to break Mega’s security system

  • Pingback: Mega enfrenta sus primeros reclamos por derechos de autor | Corillo.Com

  • ItsTheSasquatch

    Sending a false DMCA takedown request should result in jail time. I’m not talking some white collar Martha Stewart jail either–I’m talking don’t drop the soap, but even if you don’t you’re still getting raped at least twice, three times on weekends jail.

  • Pingback: Kim Dotcom puts up $13,500 bounty for first person to break Mega’s security system | 5 For Business

  • Pingback: Is Mega using a script to block third-party link-aggregating sites? : Information Technology Leader

  • Fail

    Mega Fail.

  • Pingback: Kim Dotcom puts up $13,500 bounty for first person to break Mega’s security system | Digital Gadget dan Selular

  • Josh

    I have only ever successfully been able to upload one test file to MEGA. If they are going to start this crap too then, quite frankly, fuck MEGA.

  • SoItBegins

    My best guess as to what’s going on is that some entity is crawling the web and sending takedowns on any MEGA link that’s publicly posted, as an anticompetitive measure. It’ll be interesting to see how this develops!

    • ScrewEwe2

      If people here were expecting to use Mega as a file host for wider P2P use they’re crazy. It doesn’t matter if your file is named with a bogus name like “Corporate Christmas Party Pictures” or “21fSJ68q”, if you post a link to a public linking site that describes said file as actually containing “Photoshop CS6, cracked by MKDEV TEAM, ISO file”, it will get deleted quicker than you can say “Fuck You Bob”.

      Mega can be used to distribute “Photoshop CS6, cracked by MKDEV TEAM, ISO file” to a small amount of people like family or friends, if you use
      a bogus file name like “Corporate Christmas Party Pictures” or “21fSJ68q” if you take steps to hide the contents so Mega can’t see what it is and the link isn’t publicly published anywhere. The copyright cops can’t take down anything they don’t know exists. The old WW2 saying “Loose Lips Sink Ships” is still applicable so if you don’t want charges or take down notices to be stickable, use some common sense. Most of the time people and authorities only know what you tell them. Mega is meant to be a secure private cloud storage site first and foremost, not Mega Share.

      Just Sayin’…

  • Byte Master

    Who needs #MegaUpload, where the FBI took your legal files, when you can have #MEGA where @KimDotcom deletes your legal files for you?

    The issue @KimDotcom keeps avoiding to talk about is: what to do with repeat-bogus-takedown-requesters. Right now he just keeps on deleting, and the TOS says that it’s up to you to deal with the ‘requester’.

    Repeat “accused” (falsely or not) get dealt with and their account revoked. Repeat false-accusers can just merrily go on about their business unharmed.

    It also doesn’t matter if the DMCA was sneakily constructed that way.

    Please get some answers!

  • Pingback: DotCom’s Mega removing legitimate files – CNET | Hani Dalgamouni

  • MC

    Mega has no assets in the US. Why do they need to be DMCA compliant?

  • Pingback: Kim Dotcom puts up $13,500 bounty for first person to break Mega’s security system • The Next Web

  • Pingback: Curator » DotCom's Mega removing legitimate files

  • Pingback: DotCom’s Mega removing legitimate files – CNET

  • Pingback: DotCom’s Mega removing legitimate files

  • Pingback: Kim Dotcom puts up $13,500 bounty for first person to break Mega’s security system

  • Pingback: DotCom’s Mega removing legitimate files | Tech TV

  • Pingback: DotCom’s Mega removing legitimate files | WestPenn Journal

  • Pingback: Kim Dotcom: Mega Search Engines Have to Play by the Rules | TorrentFreak

  • Anonfreak

    You need to restrict DMCA long corrupted hands
    Mega encryption will be all for nothing at this rate!

    I say,

    anything Broadcasting on TV should be allowed

    sharing on Internet. TV Shows, Movies, Anime, etc.
    TV Station broadcast them free for everyone anyway.

    About DVD/BD: should be allowed uploading on Internet

    for free once Disc Printing has shut down.
    Author should lose his/her right to claim content

    once Disc Printing is shut!

    Current DMCA system is seriously unreliable!
    TV Broadcast:

    should be always free to share & remain unlicensed until release of Disc.
    DVD/BD Distribution:

    Disc rights should go to customers once Disc Printing is

    shut down. Copyright Expired. Customers should then free to do what they want with disc.

    • DT

      i guess i agree

  • Pingback: DotCom's Mega removing legitimate files | Nyhetssida | Senaste nytt

  • zenkmenk

    Hmmm, Seems fatboy is doing things differently this time around!

    Im-Anon.tk

  • Pingback: Kim Dotcom Dangles $13,500 Carrot For The First Person Who Can Hack Mega | SiliconANGLE

  • Pingback: Kim Dotcom: Mega Search Engines Have to Play by the Rules | The Illuminati

  • Pingback: DD Tech Solutions | Mega explains removal of public files after blocking a third-party search engine that indexed user uploads

  • Pingback: Kim Dotcom Dangles $13,500 Carrot For The First Person Who Can Hack Mega | 5 For Business

  • Pingback: DotComs Mega löscht legale Musikdateien -silicon.de

  • Pingback: Kim Dotcom: Mega Search Engines Have to Play by the Rules | We R Pirates

  • Pingback: Mega explains removal of public files after blocking a third-party search engine that indexed user uploads | 5 For Business

  • Pingback: BrittHost.com – Free WebSpace! » DotCom’s Mega removing legitimate files

  • Pingback: Kim Dotcom Offers $13,580 For The First Person To Hack Mega

  • Pingback: Mega explains removal of public files after blocking a third-party search engine that indexed user uploads

  • Pingback: DotCom’s Mega removing legitimate files

  • Pingback: DotCom’s Mega removing legitimate filesCNET News | Top Technology News

  • Pingback: Além de pirataria, Mega estaria apagando arquivos sem proteção autoral | Era Sol Que Me Faltava

  • Pingback: Mega apaga arquivos legais dos usuários »

  • Person

    Or mabye, just mabye, there’s a system error that’s doing that. The instant takedown sounds like something a broken automated system would do

  • mash43

    Law and Justice, Apples and Oranges! Not the same! Rule of law does not automatically equate with true justice.

    • ItsTheSasquatch

      In Plato’s Republic, Socrates discusses the nature of justice with some guys. One of them, whose name escapes me at the moment, argues that justice is simply “the will of the stronger.” Socrates disagrees, and verbally disproves the notion… in theory. In practice, however, the guy was completely right; that’s exactly how the world works–the rich always claim their will is “justice.”

      It’s been a while, but as I recall, another guy suggests that justice is “to destroy that which is evil and protect that which is good.” This obviously leads to some nasty problems with defining good and evil, but I think we can all agree that calling laws which can be used to bankrupt families over a few minutes of music “justice” is pretty damn evil, and by extension, so are the people who claim they’re “just.”

  • Pingback: Mega apaga arquivos legais dos usuários | claudionasa

  • Pingback: Google registra patente de teclado virtual para digitação com dez dedos | claudionasa

  • Pingback: Mega apaga arquivos legais dos usuários « TecGames

  • artbyjcm

    How did he screw up so bad? He has a system that just auto-takes down legitimate content and CLAIMS there was a notice placed on it? What, does he think we’re stupid?

  • Pingback: Kim Dotcom: Mega Search Engines Have to Play by the Rules | Best Seedbox

  • Dave

    Megasearch (previously working OK) pops up with this (in French):

    Due to a script developed by Mega to delete all files indexed on Mega-search, the engine is temporarily unavailable. A solution to overcome this problem will be made shortly.

    Does this REALLY mean that the very act of searching for something publicly available actually deletes the file?

    • frozar

      Yeah. Having a counterterror force copter in and bust down your door will do that to you.

    • Dave

      Further to previous, Mega Search seems to be back up but showing a VERY small number of files. “All”,
      as I speak has only 155 files on view, which has increased slightly
      over the last few minutes. Oh….and one more! Seems a real mess.

  • Pingback: Kim Dotcoms Mega löscht tausende legale Dateien | ZDNet.de

  • Pingback: Digital Breakfast: PrivacyNet » Kim Dotcom: From Alleged Pirate to Copyright Enforcer?

  • Pingback: PaoliniJr | Mega apaga arquivos legais dos usuários

  • Heh

    If it’s encrypted on both ends how can anyone file a dmca… You can’t that’s how, what’s that smell OH the honeypot…

    • dude

      when you have link + key, you can file dmca..

  • Pingback: Kim Dotcom oferece 10.000€ a quem hackear Mega « INFOREFLEX

  • http://www.facebook.com/Steohawk Stephen Hawkins

    I can’t help but wonder if the whole purpose of Mega’s existence is a grand statement about how the DMCA is a means of censorship. It’s a fantastic way of demonstrating a reductio ad absurdum.

  • Pingback: Mega apaga arquivos legais dos usuários | Cláudio Nasa

  • Pingback: Fichiers supprimés sur Mega : la faute à des moteurs de recherche | Crédior

  • Pingback: Cyberculture roundup: EFF suggests “Three Things Students Can Do Now to Promote Open Access…Geeks… Safer Internet Day… « Erkan's Field Diary

  • Pingback: Dotcom’s Mega Removes Legal Files Citing Bogus DMCA Requests | SafetyFist.com

  • Pingback: Kim Dotcom: Mega Search Engines Have to Play by the Rules | SafetyFist.com

  • RayZfox

    He needs to hire some employees and do it like youtube does it.

  • MediaFap

    wtf are you lot moaning about?

    Don’t want your files removed? Simple, by a cheap cloud server and store what you like.

    Need to share a file with someone? Send a link.
    Need to share a file with the masses? Risk it and use a file hosting service like MEGA, it’s their servers they can do whatever they want to with the files.

    You’re moaning about a service that is FREE, fuckin’ cheapskate cunts, it’s as though storage is expensive in today’s world, fuckin’ indie artists moaning they’re legal songs are being deleted, store it yourselves muppets.

    Some people.

  • splicernyc

    As someone who uses Mega to hold a crapload of my own stuff for my own use, I am starting to wonder how safe that really is. A friend of mine used Megaupload for years as a way to distribute her completely legal videos. Her productions, her copyright. When it got shut down without notice, she suddenly lost her quick and easy way to run the business. Since my own files are there and I don’t link to them I hope that Kim dot com and Mega have the decency to let me know they are shutting down so I can make sure everything up there is backed up.

  • BTGuard - BitTorrent Anonymously

NewsBits

Even more news...

  • The Pirate Bay Isn’t Down Completely, Just Having a Few Issues

    Twitter and Facebook, not to mention the TorrentFreak inbox, are currently alive with complaints that The...

  • Pirate Bay Founder Gottfrid Svartholm on Freedom of Speech

    Freedom of speech is a highly valued commodity, but should people be allowed to say whatever...

  • Blu-ray Anti-Piracy Tech Stops Discs and Promotes Purchases

    An anti-piracy system present in all official Blu-ray players since 2012 has received a fresh update...

  • Foxtel Breeds Pirates by Locking Up Game of Thrones

    One of the main reasons why people turn to piracy is the lack of legal alternatives....

  • UK Student Admits Breaching Sony Copyrights With Leak of PS3 SDK

    Last year an Internet user known as El Nomeo leaked version 3.70 of Sony’s Playstation3 SDK...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

PopularArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.