TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

European Court of Justice To Examine ACTA For Rights Breaches

The European Commission says it is referring the ACTA anti-piracy treaty to the European Union’s top court. The Court of Justice will be asked to assess whether ACTA is incompatible with the EU’s fundamental rights and freedoms including freedom of expression and information. An ECJ ruling should “cut through this fog of uncertainty” says the EU’s trade chief.

In an announcement this morning, EU trade chief Karel De Gucht said that following discussion with fellow Commissioners, the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) will be referred to the European Court of Justice.

ACTA, a treaty aimed at harmonizing copyright enforcement globally, has been mired in controversy from its inception not least since its formulation has taken place behind closed doors. Critics fear it would introduce more online censorship and increased surveillance of Internet users.

“We are planning to ask Europe’s highest court to assess whether ACTA is incompatible – in any way – with the EU’s fundamental rights and freedoms, such as freedom of expression and information or data protection and the right to property in case of intellectual property,” said De Gucht.

During the past few weeks protests against ACTA have swept across Europe, with citizens taking to the streets in several major cities. De Gucht said he understands why people are worried.

“I share people’s concern for these fundamental freedoms. I welcome that people have voiced their concerns so actively – especially over the freedom of the internet. And I also understand that there is uncertainty on what ACTA will really mean for these key issues at the end of the day,” the trade chief said.

“So I believe that putting ACTA before the European Court of Justice is a needed step. This debate must be based upon facts and not upon the misinformation or rumor that has dominated social media sites and blogs in recent weeks.”

De Gucht insists that ACTA will not lead to the censorship or closing down of websites and will not hinder freedom on the Internet or freedom of speech, but said that the referral to the European Court of Justice would help “cut through this fog of uncertainty.”

So far the ACTA agreement has been signed by 22 EU member states, but several countries including Germany, Netherlands, Denmark, Poland, Bulgaria and Czech Republic have backed away (at least temporarily) from ratifying the agreement following the recent protests.

Australia, Canada, Japan, South Korea, Morocco, New Zealand, Singapore and the United States signed ACTA last October, leaving acceptance in the European Parliament and EU member states as the final hurdle before it goes into effect. The Court of Justice’s view on ACTA’s compatibility with EU’s fundamental rights and freedoms will be key for many lawmakers.

Previously researchers concluded that ACTA does indeed violate human rights. Whether the Court of Justice will reach a similar conclusion has yet to be seen, but in two previous rulings on anti-piracy filters the court placed the rights of the general public above those of copyright holders.

Related Posts

Previous Post | Next Post

  • Rukumouru

    It’s beautifully refreshing to be getting due process of law and respect for citizen rights in things like these.

    • Derp

      Keep in mind that treaties often go over any other laws, unless they give room to the laws of the country. (Not sure if this also applies to the EU).

      • Rukumouru

        Treaties in the EU cannot override any European country’s own law.

        • Guest

          That’s not true. The EP can adopt law to implement the objectives of the treaties. Then:

          “PRIMACY OF UNION LAW OVER NATIONAL LAW
          The direct applicability of a provision of Union law leads to a second, equally fundamental question: what happens if a provision of Union law gives rise to direct rights and obligations for the Union citizen and thereby conflicts with a rule of national law?

          Such a conflict between Union law and national law can be settled only if one gives way to the other. Union legislation contains no express provision on the question. None of the Union Treaties contains a provision stating, for example, that Union law overrides or is subordinate to national law. Nevertheless, the only way of settling conflicts between Union law and national law is to grant Union law primacy and allow it to supersede all national provisions that diverge from a Union rule and take their place in the national legal orders. After all, precious little would remain of the EU legal order if it were to be subordinated to national law. Union rules could be set aside by any national law. There would no longer be any question of the uniform and equal application of Union law in all Member States. Nor would the EU be able to perform the tasks entrusted to it by the Member States. The Union’s ability to function would be jeopardised, and the construction of a united Europe on which so many hopes rest would never be achieved.” — http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/editorial/abc_c05_r1.htm

          And:

          “In Costa v ENEL [1964] ECR 585 the European Court of Justice held that in situations where there is a conflict between the laws of member states and European Union law, European Union law prevails, because “a subsequent unilateral act incompatible with the concept of the Community cannot prevail”.” — http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Union_law

          That’s one of the issues some politicians are dishonest about: that these treaties will not change anything for member states. They certainly have the power to do so.

        • Rukumouru

          @Guest: LAWS have the power, not the actual treaties themselves. That was my point.

    • LyleD

      Something that worries me greatly about this.. They’re circumventing the normal channels by going to the ‘High Court’ first and bypassing the low courts.

      http://torrentfreak.com/return-of-the-high-court-and-low-court-111002/

      More corruption in progress? Guess we’ll see…

  • Anonymous

    Optimally, citizens shouldn’t have to fight for their rights.
    Solution? Get corporate influence the FUCK out of governments.

    • Rukumouru

      I wholeheartedly agree with you. This, however, is a refreshing change and a small step in a different, better direction.

      • Guest

        No it isn’t! This is the first step to formally announcing its legitimacy and ratification. You dumb ass.

        • http://gene-poole.tumblr.com Gene Poole

          Don’t worry!! The lobbyists are ready and willing to help the high court decipher it!

          http://www.inta.org/Press/Pages/ReferralofACTAtoECJ.aspx

          You don’t lobby a high court…that completely removes any pretense of doing this for the greater good.

    • Mwhahaha

      Most of history has been about ppl fighting for their rights. Well the interesting parts of history anyway.

      It’s only in the last 30 years or so (at best) that a fair amount of the world has accepted that say, a homosexual female black disabled Muslim should have the same rights as anyone else. Even if legally this is the case, in real terms it’s still highly doubtful if this is how it is in reality yet.

      The thing about rights is we can’t forget we need to keep fighting for them else some greedy bastard or megalomaniac idiot will try and take them from us.

      So keep fighting these greedy insane corporate monsters and their govt patsys.

      • Guest

        ‘A homosexual female black disabled Muslim’
        If you’re looking for a minority, they don’t come much rarer than that!

  • zeitsuss

    We need to tell corporates, bankers and the corrupt governments to get the FUCK OUT OF OUR LIVES and then we can begin to rearrange things for a fairer World!

  • Anonymous

    ‘De Gucht insists that ACTA will not lead to the censorship or closing down of websites and will not hinder freedom on the Internet or freedom of speech, but said that the referral to the European Court of Justice would help “cut through this fog of uncertainty.”

    if this was the case, why wasn’t anyone other than the entertainment industries and their ilk allowed to attend and be part of the negotiations? de Gucht is playing a flanker here. i do hope that those that were omitted from the ACTA meetings can give evidence at the EUCJ ‘trial’. if not, it will be another waste of time and money! unless the concerns of the people, their rights to privacy, freedom and human rights are preserved (on and off the Internet) and the overreaching desires of the entertainment industries reined in once and for all, this controversy will continue.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_VN7HXF33NHVJHTM2MVFMF7PQYY Vytautas

    I hope this is not just make facts from thin air show.

  • Anonymous

    The main problem here is that there is a good chance that the ECJ will wave ACTA through, as it does indeed not breech any European Law. It is written very vaguely, and does obstruct a much-needed copyright reform however (leave alone the problem with generica, with the acceptance of patents on living beings, and the intransparency of its drafting), so there are good reasons to be against it.

    We need to be careful in any case since IPRED 2 and TPPA are just lurking around the same corner ACTA came from (in fact many things written in IPRED 2, TPPA, and the first SOPA draft stood in the first drafts of ACTA as well, so even though they have been dropped now it is clear what the intention behind ACTA is).

  • Anonymous

    ‘in two previous rulings on anti-piracy filters the court placed the rights of the general public above those of copyright holders’

    and so they bloody well should too! since when can it be right that everyone else has to lose out simply to keep a few people raking in a fortune each year? since when has it been right that the people have to lose out because certain industries refuse, not just fail, to cater for their customers or join the 21st century and digital world, always doing their damnedest to stop the latest technology unless they actually control it?

    • Rukumouru

      You cannot stop the future. The MAFIAA are well aware of this and are scared shitless because of it.

  • Anonymous

    These guys really seem to know waht they are talking about which is really cool.
    Getting-Anon.tk

    • http://www.facebook.com/orphicdragon Trisha Lynn Dragon

      Spam elsewhere douche canoe.

    • Guest

      Guess what. I will never give you money because you spam. I hope other people do the same.

  • ZiggySig

    I am actually quite surprised, and disappointed to see European Commission acting so. EU parliament has expressed their doubts, Kader Arif (parliaments rapporteur on ACTA) has resigned expressing he had witnessed “never-before-seen manoeuvres” by officials preparing the treaty.

    To say, that the concerns are based “upon the misinformation or rumor that has dominated social media sites and blogs in recent weeks.” And that The Court of Justice should just cut all the worries away? It seems like very ignorant, or intentionally blinded look at the problem… I am disappointed, and worried.

    • Rukumouru

      The European Commission is a disgrace to democracy. Unelected officials calling the shots? Sound a hell of a lot like a dictatorship to me.

      • Mwhahaha

        I don’t know where you’re from but in the Uk and US it increasingly feels like we have a political class which leaders are elected from rather than any real democracy. In the US you need to be either very wealthy or have very wealthy supporters. In the UK you need the correct background it seems at the moment, to get into the cabinet.

        Democracy is an illusion in this county.

    • Rukumouru

      Which is why the European Parliament exists, btw. Control of the executive.

  • http://twitter.com/Anime4PSP Anime 4 PSP

    They first have signed it and only now decided to inspect it.
    Will people ever learn to first think then do?
    But still, it’s good to hear they decided to inspect it , even if late

    • Anonymous

      Governments like to act first and think second if the public demand they do.

      Even following Hadopi and the DEA only now are Governments starting to ask what is going on in this market? What real damage is being done? What action is valid to take?

  • Anonymous

    previous rulings of the court give me slight hope

    but then again, this are lawyers we’re dealing with here, so anything is possible.

  • Mwhahaha

    Off topic ( – Heads up to site)
    Interesting small article in this month’s ‘which?’ magazine asking what happens to your digital media when you die. No more inheriting mum & dad’s old vintage music collections it seems.

    • http://profiles.google.com/zerianis10 Christopher Kidwell

      Not in the RIAA/MPAA’s dream world. Unfortunately for them, courts have said that you CAN sell/inherit music collections and the ‘license’ is transferred to the new owner.

  • Tom

    “So I believe that putting ACTA before the European Court of Justice is a needed step. This debate must be based upon facts and not upon the misinformation or rumor that has dominated social media sites and blogs in recent weeks.”

    I completely agree.

    If this is given the green light by the European Court of Justice, opposing countries would have no logical reason not to sign it. Pretty smart move.

    • Anonymous

      The internet does not like your type

      GTFO culture and reality hater.

      • Tom

        You are right.. facts don’t really work well on the internet. Probably why Zeitgeist got such a huge following….

    • http://torrentfreak.com/ Rob8urcakes

      You must also agree with Hitler, Stalin, Pol-Pot, and all the other undemocratic dictators we decent people have had to deal with and remove from power.

      These UNELECTED European Commissioners have no interest whatsoever in whether or not ACTA complies with current EU law. This move to refer ACTA to the European Court of Justice is not only a delaying tactic to give them and their friends in the MAFIAAA.org etc more time to make and pass more EU law to support ACTA, it also removes our democratically elected representatives from deciding upon ACTA whilst so many voters have expressed their anger, dismay and revulsion at ACTA and its chilling effect on 21st century technology and society whilst passing more control to businesses and law enforcement.

      Let me remind you that ACTA is NOT simply a “Trade Agreement”.

      It’s a vicious, calculated attack by businesses who enjoy rights to Imaginary Property over the rights of people to enjoy and improve upon our Worldwide society.

      So the reason the EC has acted in this undemocratic manner is a cynical attempt to usurp and delay the democratic process – and although that may not yet be an offence, it is as CRIMINAL an act as any totalitarian dictator would do also.

      I call on the ECJ to reject the EC’s request.
      ACTA must now be decided upon by our elected politicians in the European Parliament, and without further delay or tweaking of ACTA.

      I also call on the European Commission to be abolished and replaced with people democratically elected by the citizens of Europe.

    • Anonymous

      Actually there is.

      Any contract or treaty which has been smuggled past due process three times and been sent back to the drawing table by outraged furor from the people’s representative each time must be considered suspect until proven otherwise.

      If the ECJ actually finds a direct violation of human rights or the EU charter in ACTA then it’s dead.

      If they don’t, we start looking at whether ACTA could indirectly lead to such violations and send it back to the ECJ.

      This is good established practice in the EU after all.

  • Kr0nZ

    I dont trust any court, unless its made up of common everyday people, truly random jury, not the ones prescreened to sway oppinions to whoever’s side
    But our governments think we don’t know what’s best for us

  • Anonymous

    if nothing else, it will show whether the EUCJ thinks Human Rights etc are more or less important than the entertainment industries profits and also what clout, if any, Viviane Reding’s statement has got. however, i can feel a big ‘people shafting’ coming here! hope i am wrong!

  • Xxx

    SHOULD NEVER sign if EU sign this SHIT then the INTERNET WILL be BOUGHT by ACTA

    BEWARE

    WE shall revert back to the old ages

    BETTER change to dial up once ACTA go GLOBAL

    • Tom

      Have you actually read the ACTA document?

      • O’lay Pirate

        I have, took me 3 attempts to realise it’s full glory.

        Easily can be used for bad but also for good, it depends how countries view the treaty and how much they let the entertainment industry get involved.

        But overall… with or without ACTA, we’re doomed and forsure we will see lots of censorship.

        • Anonymous

          Now read up on the various treaties and regulations it refers to. Many of whom are not normally subjected to as stringent routines as binding treaties but would gain far greater weight than they do now – and be more easily changed (read: without parliamentary process).

          Also check the section on how ACTA is supposed to be administrated by a commission which has the ability to make amendments in how ACTA is dealt with in reality in practical matters AFTER ACTA has been signed.

          One of the reasons it’s hard to find specific faults with ACTA is because it is basically written to be a carte blanche circumvention of due process.

  • GOODGRIEF

    BREAKING NEWS …

    Guilty Verdict in “The Great Pumpkin Trial”, Moriarty New Mexico.
    (Watch the video … classic – “fugetaboutit”)
    http://www.kob.com/article/stories/S2506701.shtml?cat=500

    “You know it doesn’t matter if it’s $500,000 or a $2 pumpkin,” McCall said. “Right is right, wrong is wrong, and at the end of the day the truth will be out.”

    “Annette Atencio, says Medina spent $75 on food that day but forgot to pay for the pumpkin she picked up as she was leaving. Atencio says her sister offered to pay but was refused and then handcuffed.”

    GOOD GRIEF!

    UPDATE: McCalls Pumpkin Patch owner, Kevin McCall, has been contacted by Chris Dodd CEO MPAA staff members to testify before Congress concerning the “Pumpkin Piracy” outbreak in Moriarty. Dodd praised McCall and quickly copyrighted “It Doesn’t Matter if it’s $500 BILLION or a $2 Pumpkin” as MPAAs new corporate motto. McCall’s attorneys, however, filed an injunction stating, ”MPAAs use of Mr. McCall’s ‘work’ is infringement.” Meanwhile, McCall has “disappeared” and was last seen entering his pumpkin patch yesterday but never leaving.

    • O’lay Pirate

      _Mind Fucked_

  • Onewayjan-004

    Should have been done much earlier however nobody dared to do it at that time

  • Anonymous

    I see several aspects to this.

    The first is that people should keep in mind that it is common for the European Parliament to send an international agreement to the European Court of Justice shortly before it is killed off when then they can kill it off before the World due to a whole list of rights abuses.

    Extra good news is that the ECJ only need to find one thing wrong with ACTA for this trade agreement to be killed off. ACTA has already been agreed on the international level and there is no modifying it now only to sign up or not to sign up.

    Also keep in mind that ACTA would have not gone through the brutal secret process it did if ACTA had nothing nasty to hide. Even the United States prior refused to officially release this document quoting that such a release was “a threat to national security”

    So I have little doubt that the great ACTA will soon fall. The ECJ has even taken a shot at ACTA a few days ago. Making service providers liable certainly means forcing on them monitoring and filtering systems.

    My only ECJ advice is to look closely into the creation of ACTA.

    On the flip side then this ECJ move should mean that there will be no EP vote on ACTA this year with March 2013 now being likely. That unfortunately will give the post-SOPA heat time to simmer down.

    We can only hope in a year’s time that enough people remember to hate ACTA.

    • Anonymous

      i dont think people will have the chance to forget it. remember, we are going to have TPPA to contend with in the mean time and i’ll bet there will be a re-introduction of SOPA in the US. that wont be any different to the one that is on hold atm, just worded slightly differently but giving the same censorship powers as before

    • Ball Juggler

      And even if ACTA fails in the EU; because all those countries already signed it, does it mean that ACTA is enforced with the signed countries?.

      • Anonymous

        no, it’s either in effect in all countries or no countries.

      • Anonymous

        Signing ACTA means nothing when ACTA only comes into effect once ratified.

        Should ACTA fail in the EU then each country can choose to ratify ACTA on its own but this is not a good idea due to public protest and would well highlight who is Hollywood’s bitch. The greater theat is ACTA ratified in later years under a “we ban you doing this until ACTA is ratified” situation.

  • Pingback: === popurls.com === popular today

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Don-Dilly/1624894683 Don Dilly

    This could go either way. While the noises coming out of the EU courts amd other eu rights bodies is promising, thereis no guarentee the executive wont try loading the panel of judges.

    That said the History of ACTA should also be noted. ACTA was written by the US gov primarily for the benefit of US media and pharmacutical companies.

    The USA first tried ramming it through the WTO who rightly voted i down. Individual countries count not stand up to the USA but they could do so collectively.

    What then happened was a travesty of democracy. The USA rather than accepting the democratic decision of the WTO has for the past few years been busy going round picking off and bullying each country individually, This is why we have seen the USAs meaningless 301 list.

    Lets hope that the eu courts will see the eu countrys acting collectively.

  • Anonymous

    “Cut through this fog of uncertainty” What? There’s perfect certainty that ACTA would destroy the internet, among other things. De Gucht’s words make it pretty obvious he’s yet another politician that’s bought and paid for.

    • Anonymous

      they should have had ACTA out in the open from the beginning if they really wanted to get rid of the “fog of uncertainty”

      cunts

  • anti ACTA
  • Istekmp3

    F2Ck 2 ACTA!!!

  • Anonymous

    What to stop these courts and politicians from passing ACTA when they already were dumb enough to fall for the MAFIAA’s bribery to block websites in Belgium, Finland and the UK? They sure don’t care about people and their rights, nor opinions. Maybe if we had stopped this bill 2 years ago when it was just as big as a threat there wouldn’t be a point of no return.

  • Steve Smith

    All this tready is, is SOPA Lite in a form they can fast track it through the bypass everything so they can pass it with no review of it.

  • Alyssa Blindy

    If they say there are no violations whatsoever, I would be quite surprised and disturbed.

  • My Life

    There ya’ll go, singing the song of “rights” and “justice”. In that case, you’ve already lost.

  • Pingback: European Court of Justice To Examine ACTA For Rights Breaches | Emmashare

  • Au

    Everything that we see is a shadow cast by
    that which we do not see.Actions are visible, though motives are secret.

  • gas

    I like that F*UCK ACTA sign :D

  • Will_the_man123
  • gas

    Googled “fuck acta” shows 282,000 results

  • Wjipj
  • Renaud Krummenacher

    Commissioner De Gucht is quite the hypocrite kind of man. In the “Civil Society Dialogue” meeting he stated : “I am not impressed by anti ACTA demonstrations”.
    http://www.actupparis.org/spip.php?article4757

    And now he thinks demonstrations is a good thing ?!?!

    “La quadrature du net” thinks it is a way to bring the debate on the wrong scene, asking if acta is legal when the question should be if it’s legitimate.
    http://www.laquadrature.net/en/ecj-referral-no-legal-debate-will-make-acta-legitimate

  • http://www.clearviewfocus.com/ Jeff Andrews

    Got to love the Europe court system!

  • Anonymous
  • Anonim

    STOP ACTA NO ACTA!!!

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/VKI36PH5RENWX3BRUVLYEDZFTQ Joace

    I am a 27 years old doctor,mature and beautiful. and now i am seeking a good man who can give me real love, so i got a sername Andromeda2002 on Agedate.?òM, a nice and free place for younger women and older men,or older women and younger men, to interact with each other.Maybe you wanna check out or tell your friends.

  • Pingback: El Tribunal de Justicia Europeo examinará ACTA por violaciones de derechos | Tecnocápsulas

  • Anonymous
  • Pingback: First American Pirate Conference Hits Massachusetts | TorrentFreak

  • Pingback: First American Pirate Conference Hits Massachusetts | U Torrent Free Download

  • BTGuard - BitTorrent Anonymously

NewsBits

Even more news...

  • The Pirate Bay Isn’t Down Completely, Just Having a Few Issues

    Twitter and Facebook, not to mention the TorrentFreak inbox, are currently alive with complaints that The...

  • Pirate Bay Founder Gottfrid Svartholm on Freedom of Speech

    Freedom of speech is a highly valued commodity, but should people be allowed to say whatever...

  • Blu-ray Anti-Piracy Tech Stops Discs and Promotes Purchases

    An anti-piracy system present in all official Blu-ray players since 2012 has received a fresh update...

  • Foxtel Breeds Pirates by Locking Up Game of Thrones

    One of the main reasons why people turn to piracy is the lack of legal alternatives....

  • UK Student Admits Breaching Sony Copyrights With Leak of PS3 SDK

    Last year an Internet user known as El Nomeo leaked version 3.70 of Sony’s Playstation3 SDK...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

PopularArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.