TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

Google Expands Piracy-Related Keyword Filter

Earlier this year Google started censoring various ‘piracy-related’ keywords from its Instant and Autocomplete services, and this list of forbidden words was updated recently. Although Google understand that there is no silver bullet that can stop online copyright infringement, the search giant told TorrentFreak that the steps they’ve taken could help to decrease piracy.

google baySince January Google has been filtering “piracy-related” terms from its ‘Autocomplete‘ and ‘Instant‘ services.

Google users who now search for terms like “torrent”, “BitTorrent” and “RapidShare” will notice that no suggestions and search results will come up before they type the full word. This week this list was expanded with (at least) one new term – Mediafire.

By censoring parts of their search services, Google is sending out a strong signal that they are committed to combating online copyright infringement. Thus far, however, the list of forbidden words still appears to be arbitrary.

Why add the name of the file-hosting service Mediafire but not direct competitors such as Hotfile and Fileserve? Why delist the BitTorrent client uTorrent but not its main competitor Vuze?

Speaking with TorrentFreak, Google spokesman Mistique Cano reiterated what the company announced in a blog post late last year. “We are removing terms from Autocomplete where we find that those terms are closely associated with infringing results.”

Google could not provide us with a full list of banned terms or elaborate on the selection process.

“It’s not easy [to share the keywords] and the list will undoubtedly change over time,” we were told.

“When evaluating terms for inclusion, we examine several factors, including correlation between the term and results that have been subject to valid DMCA takedown notices,” Google’s spokesman added.

Although Google is not able to inform the public what terms they deem to be closely connected to infringing behaviors, the company does believe that their measures could help to decrease online piracy.

“While there is no silver bullet for infringement online, this measure is one of several that we have implemented to curb copyright infringement online.”

“This is something we looked at and thought we could make some narrow and relatively easy changes to our Autocomplete algorithm that could make a positive difference,” Google’s spokesman said.

The above is interesting, since Google decided to fight a request from a French music rights organization last year, who demanded that Google would implement a similar filtering measure. Apparently they changed their minds.

Aside from censoring piracy-related terms, Google is also preventing various other terms from appearing through their Autocomplete and Instant services. Typing in “tits”, for example, is subject to the same treatment as the piracy-related words.

“We also take a similar approach to a narrow class of terms related to pornography, violence and hate speech. These steps do not remove any results from search results or prevent users from typing any term they choose into their queries,” Google’s spokesman explained.

Admittedly, the impact of the censoring of the Autocomplete and Instant features are not that dramatic. However, Google’s willingness to interfere with parts of their search service to combat piracy will motivate rights holders to request even broader filters.

Also, Google’s definition of “narrow changes” is worrying when a dictionary word such as “torrent” and trademarks of legitimate businesses such as “BitTorrent” and “RapidShare” are blacklisted. The big question is, where will they draw the line?

Related Posts

Previous Post | Next Post

  • Anonymous

    If this continues I think less people will use Google as a search engine.

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_IZ5BM5GNLA54OADSWGSXAMA7SY Jay

      Google has a lot of benefits. I’m still against this “filtering” but all this means is that people have to type in a few more keystrokes. Really this isn’t a huge deal unless they decide to block websites. The minute they do this, I’m using Bing and never returning. At least this way, they’re open about the need to “curb infringement” when it’s doing absolutely NOTHING to stop people from stopping what they want to search for.

      • Anonymous

        It is a huge deal. I’d wager a ton of people use the autocomplete suggestions, which means they will almost never find valid programs or services such as utorrent or rapidshare. The Torrent protocol or protocols similar to it are the way of the future, and Google is effectively halting a large amount of public interaction with them.

        On top of that, they are removing one type of service while leaving the other competitors to that service. Rapidshare is censored, but Hotfile, Filesonic, etc are free to go? They are treading dangerous waters here, and I wouldn’t be surprised to see a lawsuit in the future.

        At the very least, allow us to turn on the ability to autocomplete those terms, even through a hidden little string of characters typed in.

        • http://twitter.com/icanhazsake Ninja

          Google cannot beat mouth to mouth. Educate every1 you can in the ways of the torrent. I do that =))

          And Bing is a Google ripoff. There’s proof. Duck Duck Go?

          Ahem, they are not filtering the results themselves and any fool that cannot bother to type the whole thing to find proper results probably doesn’t care if Big Brother puts a cam in their bathroom if they offer automated toilet seats for free.

          What’s interesting is that the terms they filter seem to be somewhat random. I could advise them to filter each and every movie, song, game title available at imdb and the likes since all of them can be used to search for infringing content (sometimes the first result is infringing already). Oh wait, that defeats the purpose of autocomplete so just shut it down Google.

      • http://twitter.com/abusyman KyleS

        Because bing doesn’t filter results… :eyeroll:

    • bah

      another win for http://ddg.gg

      • Duck

        I don’t understand why most of search engines are located in USA… That’s the worst country to have a server!

        Let me know of other alternatives.

        • Duck

          I found this https://ixquick.com/

        • Ixquicktard

          ixquick FAQ states “Place a phrase in quotes if all the words need to appear together as a phrase, and not scattered about the page. For example, a search for “south park” is more likely to find websites devoted to the violent television show South Park and less likely to find pages about parks located in the south of France.”

          I used ixquick to search the very same term; “south park”

          It returned “No results matched your search. Please modify your search and try again.”

          Fail

      • Reader

        If the results for DuckDuckGo are from Bing, which only recently was caught mirroring google’s results, wouldn’t we just end up with a similar, censored search result list in the future? :/

      • Reader

        If the results for DuckDuckGo are from Bing, which only recently was caught mirroring google’s results, wouldn’t we just end up with a similar, censored search result list in the future? :/

      • Duckduckgoftw

        Been using DDG for months now & still getting to all the data I’m looking for.

        Gabriel>unknown corporate bureaucrats. Personalised emails beat bolierplate every time. ;)

    • DarknezzMadnezz

      This is why Xbox went with Bing instead of Google…
      Google has bent over and taken it up the arse leaving people with nothing worth searching… Guess its time to take google out of the home address and switch to Bing….

      • Zzzzz

        “This is why Xbox went with Bing instead of Google… ”

        Rubbish, Bing is Microsofts own search engine, they would hardly use Google over their own product.

      • Glad

        You do understand what you just said? Microsoft Xbox went with Microsoft Bing because Google filters filesharing-related terms………. ROFLMAO!
        Google has to give up minor things because of the cloud music service. You people do understand that it is hard to deal with copyright crowd when they want something from you and a lot harder when you need something from them.
        Yes, it would have been better if Google thought of more elegant solution. but it’s not that big of a deal.

        • http://twitter.com/icanhazsake Ninja

          Agreed. Before actually bashing Google for this we need to see the MAFIAA morons behind all this madness. Google is searching for a middle ground but it’s futile, in the end MAFIAA will want to filter and censor everything.

      • Giest

        Lol not quite. That’s how Microsoft get people to use Bing. They force it as default for windows, xbox etc. How do you think it’s usage climbed!

    • Bob

      I fear that your opinion is fairly ungrounded.

      The vast majority of internet users are not overly concerned with their ability to pirate music/software/films. Pirates do not form all internet users. Furthermore, of those who do pirate, the majority are occasional downloaders: e.g the teenager that once in a while decides to download an album or game. Or the parent who decides to torrent a bunch of films once in a while.

      Most people won’t really notice things like this happening. What percentage will even be aware that google is doing this?

      With the arrival of the Chromebook and easy Google applications on phones ( in particular smartphones) I doubt that this will dent Google’s user base.

    • Bob

      I fear that your opinion is fairly ungrounded.

      The vast majority of internet users are not overly concerned with their ability to pirate music/software/films. Pirates do not form all internet users. Furthermore, of those who do pirate, the majority are occasional downloaders: e.g the teenager that once in a while decides to download an album or game. Or the parent who decides to torrent a bunch of films once in a while.

      Most people won’t really notice things like this happening. What percentage will even be aware that google is doing this?

      With the arrival of the Chromebook and easy Google applications on phones ( in particular smartphones) I doubt that this will dent Google’s user base.

    • http://www.facebook.com/jordan.kratz Jordan Kratz

      i did press like on this but will add that all you have to do is type a few more words and you are cool.so this filtering really does nothing when it comes to finding things

    • Guest

      i think google is loosing their mind

  • I am a sausage not a hotdog

    Ok, I’ll admit Google is starting to be a pain in the “ass” opps they might filter “ass”!! I noticed many other sites. One in particular which is pretty cool. ant.com it’s really nice there is a firefox add on so you can see the ranking of a site etc.
    I won’t say i dislike google ,but i think they are making a big mistake and that’s going to affect them in the long run if they keep favoring the industry.One moment we are fighting next moment we are going against just make up your freaking minds google.

    • I am a sausage not a hotdog

      I forgot to mention that ant.com has a video downloader you can either get it on firefox or look on ant.coms site.

  • http://ilike1664.myopenid.com/ Theydontunderstandpirates

    Google are determined to be the architects of their own downfall.

    Either be open about the evil filtering of the net you’re doing or don’t do it.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Don-Dilly/1624894683 Don Dilly

    They will be including lists of dns servers and proxies next.

    Oh well , will just have to make sure the URLs of torrent search engines (and mediafire) appear far and wide

  • Rodriguez

    I see no harm whatever as long as it remains in autocomplete only. This system is so open to spamming, it does make sense to use filters. Who needs
    “how do i get my girlfriend to tape her fingers together and pretend shes a dinosaur” really ?

    • Anonymous

      THAT IS A LEGITIMATE QUESTION!

      • http://twitter.com/icanhazsake Ninja

        Totally! And probably arousing for some 8D

  • Pingback: Google Expands Piracy-Related Keyword Filter | Torrentfreak.com

  • Jimmy Dean

    Inc. new firefox extension that just searches google for whatever you are typing as you type it then displays it in the same manner as the old autocomplete.

    • http://twitter.com/icanhazsake Ninja

      Epic win. Mafiaa Fire, Google’s version?

  • http://otester.myopenid.com/ PiRat

    Screw Google, use alternatives.

  • http://otester.myopenid.com/ PiRat

    Screw Google, use alternatives.

  • Guest

    DuckDuckGo ftw

    • bah

      located in USA :|

  • Sdrgfers

    PERFECT! No I’m serious! Great work! Please expand this list more! MUCH more! In fact, make it encompass ALL possible words in any language! Why? Because I hate autocomplete and I can’t turn it off!

    • ¡Hola!

      @Sdrgfers:
      In order to turn off autocomplete, click the link on the google home page that says “Screen reader users: click here to turn off google instant.”
      I know this because I use a screenreader; I can not see at all.
      This goes out to everyone now.
      I think that anyone who relies on autocomplete is lazy. It’s not that hard to type some extra keywords. Yes, I do understand how it is bad that google is censoring some words, but not others. Also, it is not cool that they are even making little stands to censor the internet in ways. It is horrible.
      Maybe it’s about time that some person creates a program which can act as an autocomplete, for pirates. It would search the torrent sites, find the most commonly used words in file searches, and then it would complete that. That is, if you are really that lazy where you need that.
      Just my views though.
      I am also for what Idea said below this; let’s give the MAFIAA a taste of their own medicine and make pay up or else schemes.
      Let’s not just say this and leave it here, we have to do things if we want to get anything accomplished.

    • sug

      use NoScript or block IP addresses like

      clients1.google.com google-analytics.com suggestqueries.google.com

  • hmm

    hows about a good workable search engine in i2p network and screw the rest

  • Idea

    OK, just one question here: Why do websites let big companies like Google dictate the Internet?
    So Google sides with the MAFIAA, so what? We don’t need them, every website can fight copyrights and patents on their own.

    For instance, why aren’t websites forbidding access to people affiliated to the MAFIAA?

    Here is an idea:
    - Before anyone can access your website, make them read a text and click an “I agree” type button.
    - The text should be something like “To access this website, you must certify that you do not hold shares in or otherwise own a music publishing company. You must also certify that you are not currently employed by or engaged in business with a music publisher”. Add a sentence that basically says “You agree to pay a $25000 fine for lying about this information” and there you go.

    Now, it won’t really stop them from accessing your website but it might scare a few off. It will also send a clear message that “We don’t want you here”. It would certainly make the MAFIAA feel unwelcome on the Internet.
    It might also make people realize there is a very real problem with the MAFIAA and copyrights since so many people don’t want them. It’s something people could see and experience for themselves, no need to read pointless debates on the net. Everyone who uses the net would end up realizing a huge number of people hate the MAFIAA.

    And finally, if you really feel like it, and should you ever find that someone associated with the MAFIAA has accessed your website in violation of this disclaimer, you could also send them “pay-up-or-else” letters just to give them a taste of their own medicine (no need to actually expect them to pay, it’s just to make a point) or you could actually sue them. Use their tactics against them!
    “IP address XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX, which belongs to Mr. XXX, who works for the MAFIAA, (and as we all know IP addresses are people /sarcasm) has accessed without authorization our website, where copyrighted material is featured – thus this is a copyright violation (oh and accuse him of hacking while you’re at it – he did falsely click “I affirm I am not affiliated to the MAFIAA” on your disclaimer). Mr. XXX is also guilty of making illegal copies of copyrighted material since when browsing the Internet, pages are cached into a computer’s memory – thus a copy. We have on our website 20 copyrighted images, which Mr. XXX has accessed, and we estimate the cost of Mr. XXX copyright infringement to be $2000 per image.”
    Again, the Internet could fight these people with their own methods, making them realize why their methods are wrong.

    Think about it and what it would be like if this idea caught on and 1 out of 3 websites you visit had such a disclaimer. Sure would make the web look hostile to copyrights.
    Could also give anti-copyright people a legal advantage over copyright whores, which so far we seriously lack.

    I’d gladly start with this idea myself but I’m not a programmer, I don’t own a website (and making one just for this purpose won’t do much good: it has to be a popular website, not something that gets 2 visits a day) and I guess someone with a law degree should work on phrasing the disclaimer properly.
    In any case, I really think blocking the MAFIAA from accessing YOUR content is a good way of fighting back if you hate them. Even if enforcing such a disclaimer is not possible, it will have indirect consequences. It would definitely achieve more than just saying how much you hate the MAFIAA.

    • Anonymous

      Why not just send them letters for the hell of it anyways? Make up some shit like Jack downloaded this Gay porn file copyrighted to so and so at ip blah blah pay up or else. they try to weasel money from people on the basis they will pay up with out fighting so why cant we try it?

    • Anonymous

      Why not just send them letters for the hell of it anyways? Make up some shit like Jack downloaded this Gay porn file copyrighted to so and so at ip blah blah pay up or else. they try to weasel money from people on the basis they will pay up with out fighting so why cant we try it?

  • Idea

    OK, just one question here: Why do websites let big companies like Google dictate the Internet?
    So Google sides with the MAFIAA, so what? We don’t need them, every website can fight copyrights and patents on their own.

    For instance, why aren’t websites forbidding access to people affiliated to the MAFIAA?

    Here is an idea:
    - Before anyone can access your website, make them read a text and click an “I agree” type button.
    - The text should be something like “To access this website, you must certify that you do not hold shares in or otherwise own a music publishing company. You must also certify that you are not currently employed by or engaged in business with a music publisher”. Add a sentence that basically says “You agree to pay a $25000 fine for lying about this information” and there you go.

    Now, it won’t really stop them from accessing your website but it might scare a few off. It will also send a clear message that “We don’t want you here”. It would certainly make the MAFIAA feel unwelcome on the Internet.
    It might also make people realize there is a very real problem with the MAFIAA and copyrights since so many people don’t want them. It’s something people could see and experience for themselves, no need to read pointless debates on the net. Everyone who uses the net would end up realizing a huge number of people hate the MAFIAA.

    And finally, if you really feel like it, and should you ever find that someone associated with the MAFIAA has accessed your website in violation of this disclaimer, you could also send them “pay-up-or-else” letters just to give them a taste of their own medicine (no need to actually expect them to pay, it’s just to make a point) or you could actually sue them. Use their tactics against them!
    “IP address XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX, which belongs to Mr. XXX, who works for the MAFIAA, (and as we all know IP addresses are people /sarcasm) has accessed without authorization our website, where copyrighted material is featured – thus this is a copyright violation (oh and accuse him of hacking while you’re at it – he did falsely click “I affirm I am not affiliated to the MAFIAA” on your disclaimer). Mr. XXX is also guilty of making illegal copies of copyrighted material since when browsing the Internet, pages are cached into a computer’s memory – thus a copy. We have on our website 20 copyrighted images, which Mr. XXX has accessed, and we estimate the cost of Mr. XXX copyright infringement to be $2000 per image.”
    Again, the Internet could fight these people with their own methods, making them realize why their methods are wrong.

    Think about it and what it would be like if this idea caught on and 1 out of 3 websites you visit had such a disclaimer. Sure would make the web look hostile to copyrights.
    Could also give anti-copyright people a legal advantage over copyright whores, which so far we seriously lack.

    I’d gladly start with this idea myself but I’m not a programmer, I don’t own a website (and making one just for this purpose won’t do much good: it has to be a popular website, not something that gets 2 visits a day) and I guess someone with a law degree should work on phrasing the disclaimer properly.
    In any case, I really think blocking the MAFIAA from accessing YOUR content is a good way of fighting back if you hate them. Even if enforcing such a disclaimer is not possible, it will have indirect consequences. It would definitely achieve more than just saying how much you hate the MAFIAA.

  • Phatcawk

    lol people who need to use google to find stuff to download are lame anyway and should be allowed internet rights in the first place

  • Phatcawk

    lol people who need to use google to find stuff to download are lame anyway and should be allowed internet rights in the first place

  • Trespass

    Good move, Google. You are showing good faith in preventing these “terrible atrocities” done by pirates. That should keep them happy for awhile and not affect us file-sharers at all.

    I get the impression that you (Google) really don’t give a crap about piracy one way or another, you’re just playing the game. Works for me. Keep throwing them a bone now and then….

  • Anon

    There is one “silver bullet”, legalize non-commercial file sharing.

  • Anon

    Using [search term] filetype:ext (i.e. “The Matrix” filetype:torrent, “Annotated Turing” filetype:pdf, etc) yields better results anyway, you end up with direct links to the files you’re looking for.

  • Halfbrainj

    So google now leans on the side of China. No google wants to decide what is good or bad for its users. People do not need nannies.
    Is there a search engine that works as good as google but with out the Chinese filters?
    I bet people will switch to it very quick!!!

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Tom-Evans/549591812 Tom Evans

      yeah, and it won’t even be a drop on the ocean on the Google map

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Tom-Evans/549591812 Tom Evans

      yeah, and it won’t even be a drop on the ocean on the Google map

  • Guest

    I suggest that they should block the keywords Lady gaga or Mikael Jackson so our kids do not download their shit and become gaga!

    Thanks!

    • Aoeu

      rofl comparing gaga to jackson, get a clue

      • Anon

        No Jackson, no Gaga. Get a clue.

      • Lady Jackson

        Two overrated RIAA products – what’s the fvcking difference?

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_FCNK7C55CBUYFVSC5LNWKB322E Buglord

    google doesn’t want to look too bad, so they stop suggesting that people search for torrents and such, but you can still search for it on google…

  • Anonymous

    Google needs to take a stand and fight for whats right they can start by censoring results for any Mafiaa related sited . hell even remove them from their search engine period .

  • http://www.facebook.com/eric.boehm Jack Murdock

    This is useless. You make people spend another second at max. Not much of a deterrent. Google still displays the results, including the ones from the file locker in question.

    • Trespass

      Wow!! For once we are in agreement….and yes, you are correct.

      Never thought I’d say that!

    • Anonymous

      I agree with you Jack :) Never thought i’d say that. So if the people pro and against sharing share this opinion, why is Google doing it? The people who want this must be really dumb…

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_FCNK7C55CBUYFVSC5LNWKB322E Buglord

    go to google, search for: google torrent.

    just because google doesn’t suggest something, doesn’t mean you can’t search for it…
    seriously, who uses the suggestions anyway? are you really so lazy that you can’t write another word?
    if I suggested you paint your face red, would you do it? how about chicken for dinner?
    … am I making any sense at all now? anyone get my point?

  • Mikey

    I think google should sensor BSA, MPAA, and all anti-piracy outfits as well. Piracy is damaging to the industries just as these companies are damaging to private citizens and free software foundations.

  • anon

    petition to stop the protectip act http://tinyurl.com/3s2znem

    • Anonymous

      Obviously this is related to the US, but they provide no option for people outside of the US to sign the petition. I’m in Australia, but I completely oppose that act.

  • Anonymous

    OK, now what do they want to go and do that for? Thats just not cool at all dude.
    total-privacy.no.tc

  • Anonymous

    OK, now what do they want to go and do that for? Thats just not cool at all dude.
    total-privacy.no.tc

  • Anonymous

    We are filtering but we won’t tell you what. Might be your company name though…
    These are the cracks in net neutrality. Google forgets that if people don’t find what they want, they will move.

    Filtering out words that name female body parts? Because a bunch of small minded people can’t handle reality? Really?

    ALL HEIL THE MINISTRY OF TRUTH!

  • Pingback: Google Expands Piracy-Related Keyword Filter | Links Daily

  • Sir_robin

    Altavista revive?:p

  • http://disqus.com/ Rob8urcakes

    Google likes to censor.
    Google likes to fight online piracy.

    OK, fine.
    I censor Google. No more Google search, no more gmail, etc.
    Google is gone.

  • Pingback: P2PTalk » Google Expands Piracy-Related Keyword Filter

  • http://www.plrsifu.com plr store

    who cares? most of us are not searching google for pr0n. We are loyal patrons to some pt0n sites that we know the url by heart – plsifu.

  • http://www.plrsifu.com plr store

    who cares? most of us are not searching google for pr0n. We are loyal patrons to some pt0n sites that we know the url by heart – plsifu.

  • Pingback: === popurls.com === popular today

  • http://profiles.google.com/ameergittens Ameer Gittens

    Don’t like this development. Is everyone going to be a policing agent of one corporation or another? Death to control freaks. Soon.

  • http://www.facebook.com/jordan.kratz Jordan Kratz

    as long as they are not filtering websites this does not matter.i do not like using the auto-complete so i just type anyweays

  • Acheron

    Wow I’m actually disappointed with Google.
    They claim they will fight censorship, yet they passively do it on their own. What a bunch of hypocrites. Shame on them.

    Is Google willing to prevent evil, but not able?
    Then they are not omnipotent.
    Are they able, but not willing?
    Then they are malevolent.
    Are they both able and willing?
    Then whence cometh evil?
    Are they neither able nor willing?
    Then why call them a hero?

  • Bravestar

    WTF!! Stop forcing me to type out the entire word!!!

    Fail.

  • Thoughtful

    For those of you going to Bing, you do realize that for the longest time they copied their search results from Google.

    • Microshit = Fail

      Imagine Microshit copying and exploiting the work of others…

  • VxA

    Actually, I find the suggestions more annoying than helpful anyway. I know what I’m looking for, and I don’t need a search engine to second guess it for me.

  • Pingback: Google Still Kicking ‘Bad Words’ Out Of Auto-Complete

  • Guest

    wont have any effect, the people that are looking for this type of content will already have the sites that offer it in a bookmark, and obviously they will use the sites search not google.blocking the results from autocomplete will just be for first time downloaders, and chances are theyre going to be kids of approx 12 years of age.

  • Guest

    wont have any effect, the people that are looking for this type of content will already have the sites that offer it in a bookmark, and obviously they will use the sites search not google.blocking the results from autocomplete will just be for first time downloaders, and chances are theyre going to be kids of approx 12 years of age.

  • Anonymous

    It’s hard to share the list? No it isn’t… a read-only list is easy to link to.

    So they censor, AND they censor the list of terms that they censor. Which pisses me off ust as much, regardless of what arguments they make about it being for the good.

    • Drone

      I absolutely agree, b289. Another example of Google’s stupidity.

  • Snorkie

    DuckDuckGo is the new Google

    • meh

      also located in USA

    • meh

      also located in USA

  • FuzzyDuck

    Doesn’t this cut both ways?

    It also makes it more difficult for the Neanderthals working at MAFIAA outfits to find URLs of infringing works. That means less take down notices and more stuff to remain available and findable on Google if you know how to.

  • MD3

    As long as they don’t filter the results themselves, there’s nothing to complain about.

  • AnarchyNow

    Google has proved with China that they are never going to defend freedom of speech, this is just another proof of the global “chinafication” of the “free world”.

    • Snorkie

      some day, the shit will hit the fan in china….i doubt you can keep that many people that controlled forever…even behind their firewall the chinese will slowly understand what their government is doing to their freedom….china will crumble from the inside, and so will the usa.
      let’s hope it will be sooner than later in both cases :)

  • NeoToasty

    Someone needs to take Google’s place and show the virtual and real world how it’s really done.

  • Pingback: Google amplia su filtro antipiratería eliminando el término “Mediafire” de las búsquedas instantáneas — Bitelia

  • anon

    For piracy related searches, there’s always Baidu.

  • http://twitter.com/malnic Nicos Malekos

    Its so stupid, even if … lets say I am an academic wanting to read about some of these piracy related issue, or maybe a lawmaker, or even a citizen that wants to be informed, then I might want to know similar searches as the algorithm of google provides. About the porn side of the filter, its logical to avoid letting children see hard porn phrases, but why not let people who are signed in and are over 18 see them or just lower their results, If a child wants to put a “bad word” he/she will just write it … autocomplete argorithm or not.

  • Pingback: Google amplia su filtro antipiratería eliminando el término “Mediafire” de las búsquedas instantáneas |

  • Reader

    I’d like to know why the changes effect all countries and not just those that the MPAA has (undeserved) power in, such as America and possibly Canada? :/

  • bfelten

    I get autocomplete on all the buzz-words in the article. Can it be because my Google Desktop is not affected by this censorship?

  • Pingback: Google ha censurato nuove parole chiave correlate alla “pirateria” » Italia SW

  • Guest

    What is google Autocomplete services? As I use NoScript. When I search something, I know what I am searching for and typing and type quicker before the autocomplete service finishes, I don’t need a machine to pop up an annoying box trying to guess what am searching.

    Autocomplete is made for nubs. Who that uses it should get their head examined.

    Google has the most annoying services that you must use tools to block their ignorance.

    Could careless what they disable in this service as I don’t use it.

    • Violent_bob

      not nubs, but still ignorant. People are alarmngly illiterate.

  • Violent_bob

    pirate increase in case of leak of licit content no prob don’t stop make your own for others domes. violent increase will guaranty the chokehold mediacracy actually holds round the necks of you and your sis. their sh_t, you are champagne.

  • Hillary Clinton

    Google are pussies.

    • Bill Clinton

      And you sleep with more uglier women than I do!

      • Arnold Schwarzenegger

        Heck, I sleep with more ugly women than both of you combined. Winning!

  • Pingback: makin257 - Google Expands Piracy-Related Keyword Filter

  • Pingback: Anonymous

  • Guest

    I thought they were trying to fight it!

  • Pingback: Peer-meme for June 8th, 2011 | The Peer Press Podcast

  • Pingback: Google Censors Piracy Terms on Auto-Complete

  • Pingback: Google amplia su filtro antipiratería eliminando el término “Mediafire” de las búsquedas instantáneas | Dynamyza.com

  • Cujo

    basically they’re filtering a fart in the wind storm

    https://ssl.scroogle.org/

  • Pingback: Otoseek™ » Blog Archive » Google Censors Piracy Terms on Auto-Complete

  • Pingback: Google amplia su filtro antipiratería eliminando el término “Mediafire” de las búsquedas instantáneas | Bitelia | Nueva Tecnología

  • Dingobaby

    Ok…. solved the mediafire crap on google :)

    Type in the search “where is media fire” hit search….
    it comes back with a boatload of crap links…
    but !!! at the top it asks “did you mean MEDIAFIRE ?” so you click it mean ing yes you did and hey presto all the links to media fire pop up from the main site to wikipedia telling you about it balh blah blah…

    do it fast though cos i know it’s summer and those troll b*st*rds have nothing better to do the censor censored keywords….which i noticed not only censores the main site but anything else containing that word thus causing any site dependent on revenue but not related to mediafire to NOT get any site traffic via the links that would normally appear…

    Sooo google get your shit together and when censoring words the benefit of rich bastard music and video companies try to do it so you dont accidentally bar or block other none related site from getting traffic via that word….or are you tarring everyone with the same brush so to speak in the hope there will be mass hysteria and there will be fighting in the streets with website owners saying “damn that mediafire i have nothing to do with them but my traffic has halved since that word was blocked last week”

    Just think before you do things in haste for tossers who are out for everyone except themselves, that is all i am saying…

    ps : watch out there are trolls everywhere…charlie was the first to see the f*kers and nobody believed him now look at the mess the bloody world is in.

    Thank ye for reading you know it makes sense [well kinda]

  • Dingobaby

    Ok…. solved the mediafire crap on google :)

    Type in the search “where is media fire” hit search….
    it comes back with a boatload of crap links…
    but !!! at the top it asks “did you mean MEDIAFIRE ?” so you click it mean ing yes you did and hey presto all the links to media fire pop up from the main site to wikipedia telling you about it balh blah blah…

    do it fast though cos i know it’s summer and those troll b*st*rds have nothing better to do the censor censored keywords….which i noticed not only censores the main site but anything else containing that word thus causing any site dependent on revenue but not related to mediafire to NOT get any site traffic via the links that would normally appear…

    Sooo google get your shit together and when censoring words the benefit of rich bastard music and video companies try to do it so you dont accidentally bar or block other none related site from getting traffic via that word….or are you tarring everyone with the same brush so to speak in the hope there will be mass hysteria and there will be fighting in the streets with website owners saying “damn that mediafire i have nothing to do with them but my traffic has halved since that word was blocked last week”

    Just think before you do things in haste for tossers who are out for everyone except themselves, that is all i am saying…

    ps : watch out there are trolls everywhere…charlie was the first to see the f*kers and nobody believed him now look at the mess the bloody world is in.

    Thank ye for reading you know it makes sense [well kinda]

  • Dingobaby

    Ok…. solved the mediafire crap on google :)

    Type in the search “where is media fire” hit search….
    it comes back with a boatload of crap links…
    but !!! at the top it asks “did you mean MEDIAFIRE ?” so you click it mean ing yes you did and hey presto all the links to media fire pop up from the main site to wikipedia telling you about it balh blah blah…

    do it fast though cos i know it’s summer and those troll b*st*rds have nothing better to do the censor censored keywords….which i noticed not only censores the main site but anything else containing that word thus causing any site dependent on revenue but not related to mediafire to NOT get any site traffic via the links that would normally appear…

    Sooo google get your shit together and when censoring words the benefit of rich bastard music and video companies try to do it so you dont accidentally bar or block other none related site from getting traffic via that word….or are you tarring everyone with the same brush so to speak in the hope there will be mass hysteria and there will be fighting in the streets with website owners saying “damn that mediafire i have nothing to do with them but my traffic has halved since that word was blocked last week”

    Just think before you do things in haste for tossers who are out for everyone except themselves, that is all i am saying…

    ps : watch out there are trolls everywhere…charlie was the first to see the f*kers and nobody believed him now look at the mess the bloody world is in.

    Thank ye for reading you know it makes sense [well kinda]

  • Pingback: Google añade el termino "Mediafire" a su filtro antipiratería | Vidapixel

  • Ptrwtt

    If Google is no longer the lesser of all evils, what is?
    What search engine offers an equally powerful search, without any censorship? Is there one?

  • Pingback: Google censura nuove keywords legate alla "pirateria"

  • Pingback: Google Censorship Initiative Thwarted by ‘Gee! No Evil!’ Add-On | TorrentFreak

  • Pingback: Google Censorship Initiative Thwarted by ‘Gee! No Evil!’ Add-On | We R Pirates

  • Pingback: P2PTalk » Google Censorship Initiative Thwarted by ‘Gee! No Evil!’ Add-On

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=793717359 Kyle Dickson

    You all are pathetic, cheap bastards. Give up your coffee and support the artists whose works you like to watch.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=793717359 Kyle Dickson

    You all are pathetic, cheap bastards. Give up your coffee and support the artists whose works you like to watch.

  • Drone

    “While there is no silver bullet for infringement online, this measure is one of several that we have implemented to curb copyright infringement online.”

    b289

    Guess what, Google? You are not so controlling of the Internet that anything you do will help to “curb copyright infringement online,” You may curb copyright infringement on Google, but not online. Sorry – your influence is slipping away.

  • John Holmes

    Hey Kyle you plant …Go suck off the riaa and mpaa as you are their stooge …. Coming to a board that supports filesharing/torrents etc and being that ONE guy is getting old …

  • BTGuard - BitTorrent Anonymously

NewsBits

Even more news...

  • 404 Fail: Six Strikes’ Piracy Alternatives Go Missing

    After years of negotiating and planning the “six strikes” copyright alert system finally saw the light...

  • Google Doesn’t Believe Kim Dotcom is Real

    Those who enter Kim Dotcom into Google’s search box will get millions of results. Still, Google...

  • Nintendo’s Miyamoto: Piracy More Concerning Than Used Games Market

    In an interview with Computer and Video Games, Nintendo designer Shigeru Miyamoto says that his company...

  • Monitoring BitTorrent Activity on a Network Using WireShark

    As all readers should know by now, BitTorrent activity is public and can be easily logged...

  • The Pirate Bay Suffers Downtime

    The Pirate Bay is not responding at the moment and most proxies appear to be down...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

PopularArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.