TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

RapidShare Gets 150,000 Euro Copyright Infringement Fine

Earlier this year, cyberlocker service RapidShare was ordered by a court to remove nearly 150 electronic books from its archives and prevent users from re-uploading them by implementing a filter. According to the publishers who brought the case, RapidShare quickly breached the injunction. Today, the Regional Court of Hamburg agreed and hit the file-hosting company with a 150,000 euro fine.

rapdsharelogoOn February 4th 2010, a group of large book publishers filed a lawsuit against file-hosting service, RapidShare. The plaintiffs, Bedford, Freeman & Worth and Macmillan, Cengage Learning, Elsevier, The McGraw-Hill Companies and Pearson, are all large suppliers of textbooks.

Listing 148 titles to which these publishers hold the copyrights, the lawsuit demanded that RapidShare stop making available to the public user-uploaded versions of these books via its service.

On February 10th 2010, the District Court in Hamburg issued a preliminary ruling against RapidShare. The Court ordered the file-hoster to stop making available electronic versions of the text books within 7 days by removing all current titles and monitoring user uploads to ensure no more were uploaded. Failure to do so would result in the company being subjected to a fine of up to 250,000 euros.

However, according to the publishers who conducted searches of the RapidShare archives after the injunction was issued, most of the titles in the lawsuit remained available. With evidence of the breach of the injunction in hand, they asked the Court to impose fines.

Today, the Regional Court of Hamburg upheld a fine of 150,000 euros for breaching the injunction.

The Court stated that RapidShare “…culpably failed to take reasonable examination and control measures. These measures include the utilization of a word filter, which checks the file name during the uploading of files to the servers of [Rapidshare] with regard to whether the author, the title, the ISBN number of the publisher may be contained in this name.”

RapidShare was also ordered by the Court to install a word filter for new user uploads and is also “required to search the relevant popular external link libraries for links to files with the works in dispute.”

Dr. Ursula Feindor-Schmidt, an attorney representing the publishers, said that the measures imposed by the Court provide the necessary mechanisms to prevent copyright infringement on the titles detailed in the injunction and to “prevent businesses like Rapidshare from profiting from unauthorized access to and illegal distribution of copyrighted works.”

Related Posts

Previous Post | Next Post

  • dan

    Wont even make a dent in their profits.

  • Anonymous

    And filters never work. Ever.
    And you also expect them to “monitor” each and every user.
    R’ly?
    LOL

    I wonder if R/S is gonna appeal, like real soon.

  • Shiny Gardevoir

    Rapidshare has been dying since they removed the rewards system. Since then people have started using them less. All these monitoring requirements are doing is killing Rapidshare faster.

  • Anonymous

    Does anyone really believe people will stop sharing things, really?

  • Anonymous

    Does the court have juristiction over R/S where are they based and or hosted ? The worst they could possibly do is order transaction companies to stop processing german transactions

  • Anonymous

    Retards. I guess they don’t realize RapidShare is just one of literally hundreds of ‘cyberlockers’.

  • jim

    not even a days revenue for rapidshare i bet.

  • Anonymous

    Yo McGraw-Hill & Co, I’m real happy for ya and Imma let you finish, but I just got to say the “rename file” function is the best of all time and it beats your silly word filter.

  • Moe

    Every time im on this website, I see them suing/fining some new piracy website. Do they seriously think the can make a difference. Sure shut one site down, the next day there are 3 new one’s to replace it. My advice: GIVE UP!!!

  • Ian Moone

    bye bye rapidshare!!

    no one’s gonna miss you!

  • Pingback: Tweets that mention RapidShare Gets 150,000 Euro Copyright Infringement Fine | TorrentFreak -- Topsy.com

  • Anonymous

    And nothing of value was lost.

  • Nobody

    That’s just not a fair fine, as there’s a ton of ways to easily get around content filters. Not a fan of Rapidshit, but that fine is just absurd.

  • neostyles

    And why exactly won’t a word filter work? If a file is titled “Transformers2.DVDrip.AXXo.part1.rar” I think we can assume that it is copyrighted material. Hell, all you would really need if the “Transformers2″ title.

  • Amak

    Rename the file to bypass the filter, and chuck a random .txt file into a .rar to bypass any sort of checksum filter. Filters never work.

  • Truther

    Would use rapidshare why again?

  • Flying Dutchman

    In an US court, they would have got 15 million dollars of fines, instead of 150.000 euros

  • Torin050

    “Nothing lasts… But nothing is lost.”

  • noko

    I quite honestly welcome the death of Crapidshare.

    I really, really do…

  • iop

    150k is like petty cash for a monolith like RapidShare. The precedent set by this is more damaging than the fine itself.

  • hotdog

    well i had a comment but it’s gone anyways.
    Most of those books are educational and honestly way over-priced you know these companies forget the use of the “public library”
    Anyone can get what they want free.
    But suing for showing online hmmm wanting more bucks to stuff those pockets of your as if students don’t pay enough?
    Educational books shouldn’t be so expensive and when student can’t afford them you’ll take that 1 thing that can educate.
    Yep corporate world exist in books too and not just music and film.

  • /usr/

    The courts put them in an impossible position. I don’t see how can win. They’re always going to get caught out hosting unauthorised content that users upload unless they monitor and verify as authorised every single upload to the service.

    The courts should be taken to court themselves for being such unreasonable pricks.

  • John

    and not a shit was given anywhere.

  • Shiny Gardevoir

    @20 “Thank you for your upload please wait while we verify that it isn’t illegal. This may take several hours/days.”

  • Caveman

    stories like this make me wanna up & download even more. just to piss them off

  • fktr

    rapidshare has already made its suicide, as mentioned in @3.

    i say it’s their own fault for trying to cut deal with the mafiaa, instead of being on the side of people.

  • Anonymous

    Most of the crap in text books should not be copyrighted at all. It is just regurgitated knowledge that has been around forever. There is nothing new or creative in most of these books that ought to qualify for a copyright.

    If I changed a few things in a harry potter book created an new character or two would I get away with copyrighting the work as original? The point is no matter how you explain 2 + 2 you should not be granted a copyright because there is nothing new or original in this no matter how creative you are in explaining it.

    Nor should a book full of engineering, chemical or math equations qualify.

    The point is a copyright should not be granted on everything that is put on paper but whether there is anything unique and creative. In other words like a patent there ought to be a process that grants a copyright.

    As I have said in other posts if the dickbrained publishers would offer their books in digital form at a reasonable cost it would mitigate a lot of the file sharing.

  • Anonymous

    @21

    That’s some serious lulz there.

    150 books? That sounds like a pittance compared to the goliath of other things you can find on there. Has anyone forgotten that they don’t have the power to control user actions? All they can do is implement something that’s both repulsive to potential paying users and only stops n00b tactics.

    And the courts expect them to create an air tight “piracy containment membrane”? Well that’s what you get when you don’t take action (*cough cough hypocrite speaking*).

  • Lemming

    @21

    That’s some serious lulz there.

    150 books? That sounds like a pittance compared to the goliath of other things you can find on there. Has anyone forgotten that they don’t have the power to control user actions? All they can do is implement something that’s both repulsive to potential paying users and only stops n00b tactics.

    And the courts expect them to create an air tight “piracy containment membrane”? Well that’s what you get when you don’t take action (*cough cough hypocrite speaking*).

  • Delete

    Someone delete this post and the first double. There should be some sort of message there Torrent freak; what happened?

  • 6sixty6

    bye bye rapidshit

    i not gonna miss you!

  • johnson

    makes the fines that jamie thomas-rasset and joel tenenbaum got seem even more extortionate, to say the least. individuals get stuffed and companies get what is little more than a slapped wrist! and no fine for the number of times the ‘books’ were downloaded either!

  • Anonymous

    Well I hope I get to finish my quest !!

    75 x xputnvx.rar lol

  • Sweden

    @30 “bye rapidshit

    i not gonna miss you!”

    I fully agree with that time to dumb rapidshit and use hotfile, megaupload, megashares and many many other file hosting services.

  • Aerilus

    didn’t they just win a case saying safe harbors applied because of the service they supplied God I love modern society sue if you lose sue again and if you still lose bribe then sue then when you lose that one pay someone else to sue, then replace all of the Is with Ones and resubmit. don’t the creative content industry’s realize that they will never see the massive amount of money they are pouring down lawyers throats and that they are not even scaring anyone anymore.

  • Mr X Gets Tense

    Speaking on TV Chris Wright said it had been a “bittersweet moment” to part with the company he co-founded 43 years ago, but admitted the future looked rocky.

    “I think it’s very hard to really say there’s a sustainable business model for a record company,” he said.

    “The biggest problem we’ve got as an industry is coping with the amount of illegal downloading which is sucking so much revenue out of the industry.”

  • DuellistOrigins

    13:

    “Transformers2.DVDrip.Review”

    That would contain entirely non-copyrighted material, but the filter would kill it. That’s no use to anyone.

    How about:

    “ABeginnersGuideToTheElectronicComponentsOfTransformers2″?

    The word filters have to be bloody good to avoid this sort of thing. And we can’t do it yet.

    (And yes, I know you’re the troll, but that one was a sufficiently interesting problem to respond to.)

  • maxi

    now :
    hotfile
    fuleserve
    filesonic
    megaupload
    own the services:)

  • PlayBoyMan

    Forget RapidShare. (Quick note: I didn’t want to use the word “Forget”,)

  • Ano

    You have to be stupid anyway to use a name that reflects what the file is. I always use stupid names or generate random strings when uploading.

  • Troll

    first

  • http://www.jgrql.cn ?????

    ???????

  • bamfan5520

    Dr. Ursula Feindor-Schmidt, an attorney representing the publishers, said that the measures imposed by the Court provide the necessary mechanisms to prevent copyright infringement on the titles detailed in the injunction and to “prevent businesses like Rapidshare from profiting from unauthorized access to and illegal distribution of copyrighted works.”

    1. PROFIT OFF WHAT?
    2. Rapidshare charging people to download off their servers (WRONG)
    3. Prevent copyright infringement (FAT CHANCE OF THAT HAPPENING EVER)

    Courts, get this, WE DONT CARE ABOUT YOU! We are not infriging off anyones rights or even our own…Most of us dont pay to use rapidshares download service which means, they are not profiting off of our downloads…Listen to me good…You courts have NO IDEA what you are fighting to protect which is nothing…Your fighting against profits when none were made, fighting against infrigement when no one is altering the other persons work, or preventing infringement when infrigement never took place…Obviously the courts dont know what infrigement means…They have taken that term and grossly misused it…Lookup what infrigement means, it does not mention getting copyrighted works for free…Infringement is if someone takes someone elses published works, alters it a little bit, and calls it their own…IDIOTS! This is just funny to me…Everytime I see the words infrigement and profit in the same sentence, I laugh since the courts are completly stupid…

  • lulz

    Zip files into single file named using a GUID (http://www.guidgenerator.com/online-guid-generator.aspx) then use the last 12 of that GUID as the password for encrypting the zip.

    :)

  • kkks

    pass protect files and change file name name, there is no way they can find it without direct link from warez

  • Xult

    What are euros?
    do they help te relieve constipation?

  • Brudda

    @44
    “What are euros?
    do they help te relieve constipation?”

    Do you remember Pogs from the ’90s? Euros are like Pogs. They are popular now and everyone wants them, but in a couple years they will be totally worthless and nobody will want them.

  • Ven

    Keep in mind guys that they aren’t being fined for failing to stop “illegal” file sharing. They got the fine because they failed to act upon their last court-ordered requirement.

    They needed a filter to deal with Title, Author, and/or ISBN numbers located within the file’s name. Whatever they did do, it wasn’t enough, and all the publishers had to do to prove this was upload a file with that stuff and show that it was being shared anyway.

  • jlegend

    Havent you ppl figured it out now.. The retarded rule the world and think the world is flat and sunshine is something you drink… If you dont agree with them you will pay a fine or go to prison lol

  • lol

    good they got what they deserved charging people to download copyright material piracy is free lol

  • lulz

    @49 I actually laughed… Touché!

  • Student

    Don’t feel sorry for the publishers, they rob students like me blind everyday. They should be ones on trial when they charge the people who could least afford it ~$130 a book.

  • lulz

    @51 But you forget the whole “Edition 11″ where all they did was correct a few (not all) typo’s and that bad graph on page 57 so that they could re-release the same book at the same price and require people to buy it again year after year instead of people being allowed to use the first 10 editions that are already in circulation at resale prices!

  • Cujo

    a good point was made a few times here ,, split it up and rename ur ;)

  • MasterJ633

    Good. MegaUpload and MediaFire are 100x better.

    Somebody just write RapidShare in the Death Note and save them the trouble.

  • Pirate forever

    This could be far more serious than it seems for file hosts. It is impossible to prevent the upload of copyrighted material and the people who started this case know it. This will be just what the pro copyright people want as it will enable them to extort money (sue) from file hosting services until they cannot continue.

    Think about what will happen now with every copyrighted movie, song, tv show etc etc. How can any file host prevent these things from being uploaded?……..they cannot!

    Hashing the files is the closest method and that is very easily broken with a file hash changer, simply adding a byte to the end of the file.
    Filenames are useless, Transformers2.[insert any file extension here] could be a text file about how much a person loves the movie.

    The only method would be to manually test/check every single file uploaded and that will be close to impossible due to quantity and time. That’s before Rar passwords are considered.

    RS will have to get their best Lawyers working on an appeal.

  • asmpredator

    Rapidshare is dead, without uploaders will not sell premium accounts.

  • General Snus

    36/DuellistOrigins basically already said it. I dont see how a filename word filter could possibly not get tons of false positives. You can’t copyright a word or combination of words (besides a book obviously), the transformers example he gave is exactly the kinda things I was thinking of.

  • haha

    “Anti-waiting company” my ass! Go die greedy rapidshare!
    Long live MediaFire and Hotfile!

  • THeONE

    an assault on one of us is an assault on us all

    when rapidshare decided to back away from its users, we abondaned the ship…and now its sinking and all the rats are happy…hey its not our problem

    But if they can take down rapidshare, what makes you think it wont be megaupload next and so on so forth until we would have no place left to share?

  • anon

    Whole thing reeks of courtroom scam artists, judges are just scam artist lawyers who have graduated to the big time. Bottom line, Hamburg needs money.

  • LOL

    RS files has been gone…everyone knows this…the reason people still target this filehost is Hotfile and megaup get lawyers and there goons to annihalate them …cut throat man

  • Twit

    We,as text book retailer’s,reserve the God damn right to charge ridiculous amounts for material that you absolutely require.

    So there.

  • Anonymous

    @39 this doesn’t help people searching for content using words. It is possible that people like you share files using other names and instead they are kiddy porn or people having x with animals when you download the file instead. This is probably how the cops and nbi v people.

    @54 mediafire removes too many files, I have tried to download like at least over 50 files from there over time and they were removed.

  • x3style

    See cooperating with them does not help either.

  • hmmm

    @45 & 46

    Reality check : if the fed bought $600 billions in treasure bonds lately, that means the ‘market’ (the rest of the world) doesn’t want US bonds anymore.

    Maybe the euro will be like pogs in a few years. But it seems the dollar is already pogs, now.

  • JAYZZY

    im so happy to hear that :D

  • Peter

    We started uploadie.com recently and think the image of being an illegal file host would really damage our reputation. How many reputable websites use rapidshare?

  • Andy

    @67

    Great, we will all start uploading warez on your site now, thanks.

  • Anonymous

    How is rapidshare dead if they ignored the ruling and still let people do what they want?

    1. utilization of a [word] filter
    2. required to search the relevant popular external link libraries

    Two reasons which again demonstrate that government know nothing about the way this world works anymore.

  • Anonymous

    If mediafire remove too many files, who are the good ones that give users what they want?

  • Pingback: Multa de 150.000 euros a RapidShare | WebNews

  • Anonymous

    @67 Having a good reputation is about reflecting what the upload community says to you

  • Boba Fett

    Rapidshare is so poor.

  • Anonymous

    I am glad Rapidshit is dead.

  • Whatever

    Sleeping with the enemy gets you stabbed in the back.

    The court is essentially saying that these publishers own words and rapidshare has to actively scan the whole internet even more than google.

    They redefined copyright to “before typing anything check all existing data in the world to make sure nobody did it before you” (which can’t be done because it is not all publicly available).

  • AnarchyNow

    - Rabbidshit sucks and they deserve to be taken down with all the profits they make on piracy.
    - you can put a file called “my holiday photos.rar” with a password, no-one will know what’s in it, no matter how many “filters” they make, so unless it’s “guilty until proven otherwise”, there’s no way they’re gonna win.

  • Pingback: Rapidshare : 150 livres partagés, 150 000 euros à payer | Agence de Communication - Snowi

  • Pingback: 3 Count: Fashion Template | PlagiarismToday

  • Pingback: RapidShare Gets 150,000 Euro Copyright Infringement Fine | Systema

  • Pingback: Multa de 150.000 euros a RapidShare | Últimas noticias al segundo

  • Peter Kleissner

    And what’s the answer of RS?

  • Mr X Gets Tense

    @42 bamfan

    Copyright infringement is the unauthorized or prohibited use of works under copyright, infringing the copyright owner’s exclusive rights, such as the right to reproduce or perform the copyrighted work, or to make derivative works.

    “Right to reproduce” GET IT… it’s you that’s wrong not the courts, you do make us laugh tho bamfan5520

  • 5318008

    4shared 4thewin, who uses RS??

  • bamfan5520

    @ Mr X Gets Tense

    To the people like this douchebag, we need to stand up…Remember my fellow P2P community, we have already owned 1 Anti-P2P company..this is just a start…If RIAA trolls like this continue to invade private P2P sources, they will win…We need to find the IP addresses of people like this, have Operation Payback ddos them and wipe them off the internet…By the way, THAT IS NOT WHAT INFRIGEMENT MEANS YOU RIAA SCUM…Infrigement is the unathorized reproduction of already published work being utilized by someone else by altering it…INFRINGEMENT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH P2P NETWORKING!!! GET A CLUE!!! Remember scum, this war has only begun…We WILL CONTINUE TO WIN!!! Everyone, do this guy a favor, download peerblock now and but this guy out of a job…Give him something to think about cause within the next 2 years, I can bet you the RIAA/MPAA/Anti-P2P companies will be no more!!You also forget troll, the P2P community streachs trillions of people every hour….If all of us took you to court, they would need 1,000,000 staples centers to equal our numbers and even then, might need more…Dont start a war you cant backup cause I can back it up all day and you will not win!

  • KingDingeling

    It doesn’t say it in the text, but I’m pretty sure the ‘regional court in Hamburg’ is in fact the Landgericht Hamburg (third instance of the German judicial system), a court best known for it’s “unique” rulings which usually get overturned by the very next instance. The Bundesgerichtshof (highest federal court before the German Verfassungsgericht/Supreme Court) bitchslapped the court in Hamburg more than once for it’s utter incompetence, mostly in free speech issues.
    One of the judges (Andreas Buske) even got a whole site dedicated to ridicule him (buskeismus.de)

    Now there is a thing called ‘Störerhaftung’ in Germany which means that if you are a provider of services online, you can be held responsible for punitive damages caused by the actions of third parties, but only if you don’t take appropriate action against the infringements. Appropriate in that case means all you have to do is remove flagged files. You don’t have to prescan all the file titles or even check their content.

    So what I’m basically saying is, that this ruling will definetely NOT stand, not because it is unjust, but because it is contradictive to German law.

  • KingDingeling

    Oh and I couldn’t resist showing you a picture of Judge Buske and no, that’s not a wig. We don’t wear wigs in German courts.

    http://www.buskeismus.de/berichte/images/buske_andreas_100503_1.jpg

  • pringerX

    The textbook industry is one of those large, ongoing scams. A new text book every year, every other year? Give us a break. I’ll wager 95% of the content between editions are the same, and any good professor knows textbooks are at best a reference encyclopedia; the heart of any class is in course notes that distill the key information. Saying “Read pp200-300 for tomorrow’s class” doesn’t work, what works is saying “Read the lecture notes and reference pp200-300 for additional info”. Of course, that requires effort to make good notes for the lecture, so it might all be a collusion between lazy, tenured professors and the textbook companies.
    …wait, did I say that out loud?

  • bamfan5520

    @80 KingDingeling

    Very true…It will not stand nor will the Anti-P2P aka Maffia win the case since they are all so stupid they dont even know what infringement means…Infringement has nothing to do with P2P networking nor does it have anything to do with sharing files over the internet in a public network…Its people like the RIAA/MPAA/Anti-P2P or summed up into one group, RETARDS with no clue what infringement is, that need to get lives and stop trolling for more money cause we will win and we are already on the road to freedom…

  • Anon

    OCH sucks anyway! torrent ftw!

  • Telluride

    Oh my, how the freeloaders get worked up into a frenzy when someone tries to take away thier freebies.

    Get a life. Pay your way instead of being leeches.

  • Anonymous

    Read till Hamburg. Then stopped.
    Hamburg is bought.

  • Pingback: Rapidshare multada con 150000 euros por infraccion de derechos de autor - Foros de Informatica - Foro de Windows 7, Foro de ayuda, Noticias de Informatica, Windows 7 y Windows Vista

  • Guenthar

    bamfan5520:

    Did you know that what you are saying is “infringement” is actually the definition of “plagiarism” which is something different then infringement. Infringement means unauthorized accesswhich applies to copyright infingement as unauthorized access to the copyrighted work.

    If you disagree with me then look it up in a dictionary and you will get something similar.

    PS. I don’t like Rapidshare but I don’t agree at all with word filters being applied to the internet so I hope Rapidshare appeals and wins.

  • Reality

    Rapidshit is dead anyway, who cares.

  • SlSkr

    Am I the only one that realises that this MUST be about Rapidshare.de?

    If the court is in Germany, its about a germany based entity. Rapidshare.com is based in switzerland. Rapidshare.de is, in the eye of the law, not assosiated with rapidshare.com.

    This has NOTHING TO DO with the rapidshare we all use.

    Plz correct me if I am wrong… but I cant see how this could be about the sitzerland based rapidshare.com

  • Pingback: Online Global Week in Review 3 December 2010 from IP Think Tank

  • has to do with

    Since the 1st of March 2010 there is no rapidshare.de anymore. So this have to be about the switzerland based rapidshare.com ?!

  • SlSkr

    Look at the dates in the article ;-)

    On February 10th 2010 rapidshare(.de?) has been ordered to remove said ebooks, but didnt comply, according to the plaintiff.
    Thats what this case is about.

    So no, the fact that rapidshare.de has closed down in march does not necessarily mean that this is about rapidshare.com.

    Cant torrentfreak clarify this?

    The way I expect this to be:

    When the infringements happened, rapidshare .de and .com where still 1 company. At one point they split (i remember reading it here), making a seperate, switzerland based company for rapidshare.com. The case ofcourse is bound to the owners at the time of the infringement, therefor the germany based company that after the split where only responsible for rapidshare.de

    So again, this does not concern rapidshare.com directly. It only concerns the german based rapidshare company, that is infact in-operational by now anyway.

    Still, can anyone (preferably the editor of this article) clarify which legal person (i.e. rapidshare gmbh of germany or rapidshare ag of switzerland) has been sued here? It is an important info to the case.
    In my legal understanding, a german court has NO dealings with a swiss company being sued by a german publishers group…

  • has to do with

    But which injunction they could have breached by abandon their whole service ?

    Uhh … maybe you’re right and they’ve breached the injunction in February, but what have the court done till now ?

  • Anonymous

    @26 by Anonymous

    “If I changed a few things in a harry potter book created an new character or two would I get away with copyrighting the work as original?”

    Probably – http://www.saynotocrack.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/61074_harrypotterstarwars.jpg

    @(Lots of people)

    “I hate Rapidshare” – “Rapidshit is dead anyway, who cares” – “Rapidshare sucks good riddance”

    Whether you like or loathe RS is irrelevant

    Whether you use or don’t use them is irrelevant

    Whether you think that “myawesomefilehost” is better is irrelevant

    The principal is the important thing – If it happens to RS today then you can be sure that it will happen to “YourFavouriteFileHoster” sometime soon

  • Anonymous

    h3r3 15 y0ur w0rd f1l73r! now 5cram!

  • Pingback: Rapidshare es condenado a una multa de 150.000 euros | Todobit

  • Anonymous

    FAIL for Rapidshare

  • Ninja

    Ok, since I can’t name it with the title I’ll just use 328hfhiiws9878hewef.rar and link it on my forum. Filters fail. Thank you.

    Publishers are even worse than MAFIAA, since they are mimicking them in the earlier stages a few years ago. LOL.

  • bamfan5520

    @87 Guenthar

    Wow, you work for the RIAA, you realize what you said makes absolutly NO SENSE!!! Infringement has NOTHING to do with sharing media with another person…People have been doing that way before the internet even started…Infringement has to do with someone else taking someone elses work, using it and calling it their own..Here is an example so you understand…Say 50 Cent made a song and published it on a recent CD release, then some noname artist decides to use that song, alter it, call it his or her own, publish it and make money off of it…THAT IS INFRINGEMENT, NOT SHARING MEDIA WITH OTHER PEOPLE…GET A CLUE TROLL!!! People, please stand behind me while I watch a giant bubble of crap explode cause that is exactly who this person is that I am correcting…If anyone took the time to actually study in school which most trolls on here obviously didnt since they got their jobs by having sex with someone who works in the office, then you would understand that what we are doing is perfectly fine…Unlike the RIAA trolls on this site, I have done my research and I can go on all day in page detail about why what we are doing is fine…But, there is no reasoning with an RIAA troll since they are paid to be bios monkeys by censoring our freedom on the internet…Hey Guenthar, do the P2P community a favor, go down to a P2P users house and ask for a sandwich that has been named after you and eat it…You will find it is loaded with Crab, Bologna, and HorseS#!t cause that is all that came out of your mouth with that retarded (TOTALLY BIOSED & FALSE) Statement!

  • dun dun dun

    eye M knot shur sirching 4 faile naames wll stp nething.

  • someone

    It looks like rapidshare will go down soon being all of there links are dead now and the changes they made in the last few months!

    hotfile fileserve filesonic megaupload
    and the list go’s on for newer file host servers poping up every where to make a quick buck, and soon these file host servers will go down like rapidshare.

    Let’s face it host servers know it illegal content being used though there server, as long as the money is coming in who cares.

    piracy sells!

  • Pingback: R&B Singers- Fantasia – Bittersweet (OFFICIAL MUSIC VIDEO)

  • Smarts

    Bam Fan- you’re not helping us. Are you a troll? No need to argue about what infringement means. Try some different drugs already.

  • Smarts

    “Thank you for your upload please wait while we verify that it isn’t illegal. This may take several hours/days.”
    if theyre going to filter words, that means they can essentially do whatever they want to the files. Like open them and check for legalality. File name won’t matter. I’m sures there’s tech already invented that can do this with both words and video and music. And they’ll just ban password protected or encrypted files unless youre like a premium verifed member or something.
    Point is, this case is precedence. If they’re filtering words now, there’s really no end to what they can do.

  • Anonymous

    RapidShare should charge the publishers for monitoring to make them think twice. It is disgusting that publishers want everything for free.

  • Anonymous

    rapidshare is going to die!

  • okokok

    at a 2kb .txt file. OH SNAP! New filesize, new hash! Change name of file. OH SNAP. It’s not an Ebook, it’s a piece of freeware software now! Password protect the zip or rar file. OH SNAP! We HAVE NO DAMN CLUE WHAT THIS IS…

  • Anonymous

    HAH! LOL! ect.
    So if i upload my copyrighted photo’s to rapidshare, i can sue them? Of course i will be uploading from proxies servers and libraries from all over Europe where i travel. But that is easy money…

  • UNF

    Yet another decision reinforces the validity of InternetRule #47:

    “The impotent dicta of bewigged foolz already judged and found guilty for contempt of Teh Internetz, a gnarly cock-vein for lulz they are.”

    Must be time to pound another lesson into the chrome-domes by routing around this ludicrous effort to disturb The Force.

    Hence InternetRule #48:

    “And verily shalt thine Enemies be choked with a Chain of 7 proxies.”

  • BTGuard - BitTorrent Anonymously

NewsBits

Even more news...

  • The Pirate Bay Isn’t Down Completely, Just Having a Few Issues

    Twitter and Facebook, not to mention the TorrentFreak inbox, are currently alive with complaints that The...

  • Pirate Bay Founder Gottfrid Svartholm on Freedom of Speech

    Freedom of speech is a highly valued commodity, but should people be allowed to say whatever...

  • Blu-ray Anti-Piracy Tech Stops Discs and Promotes Purchases

    An anti-piracy system present in all official Blu-ray players since 2012 has received a fresh update...

  • Foxtel Breeds Pirates by Locking Up Game of Thrones

    One of the main reasons why people turn to piracy is the lack of legal alternatives....

  • UK Student Admits Breaching Sony Copyrights With Leak of PS3 SDK

    Last year an Internet user known as El Nomeo leaked version 3.70 of Sony’s Playstation3 SDK...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

PopularArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.