TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

uTorrent Gets Chatty With Milestone 3.0 Release

The uTorrent development team officially released version 3.0 of their popular application today. The milestone release adds many new features including torrent ratings, comments, streaming, and drag-and-drop sharing. One of the main goals is to appeal more to novice BitTorrent users, who often drop out after using uTorrent only once or twice.

utorrentuTorrent has come a long way since it first saw the light of day in the fall of 2005. What started out as a minimalist and no-nonsense client targeted at an already BitTorrent-savvy crowd, has slowly become an application that does far more than downloading alone.

During the past year many new features have been announced and tested, and nearly all of these are included in today’s first stable release of uTorrent 3.0.

The release introduces a wide range of new features and improvements that have been extensively tested over the past several months. With these additions, uTorrent parent company BitTorrent Inc. hopes that their flagship client will appeal to an even larger audience.

A new feature we already discussed when it was first added to the beta release is the option to rate and comment on torrent files. True to BitTorrent’s nature, this data is not hosted on a central server somewhere, but among downloaders.

All comments and ratings associated with a particular file are shared among members of that swarm. If another peer has a comment that you don’t have already, it will send it to you, and vice versa. The messages are sent through the tracker and don’t rely on DHT, which means they work on private torrent files too.


uTorrent comments and ratings

utorrent

Together, the comments and star ratings are supposed to give downloaders information on the quality of the various files they’re downloading. And there are more ways to get social with uTorrent 3.0, the new uChat app for example.

With uChat users can create both private and public chat rooms to discuss file-sharing related issues and more. The new app also allows users to add buddies and to share files quickly by generating magnet links. Again, this is all supported by decentralized technology and no data is stored on a central server.

Besides the chatty additions, uTorrent 3.0 also has many other interesting capabilities. The option to stream video before the download finishes is one of the features now added to the core uTorrent functionality. Streaming can be used to preview video files or to watch while downloading.

And then there’s the user interface which has been revamped completely. Among other things a “simplified view” has been added, allowing users to minimize parts of the uTorrent interface to focus attention on the most essential client features. This should make uTorrent less ‘overwhelming’ to novices, who now often drop out because it looks too complex.

Other new features to keep novices on board are the “getting started” guides that now have a prominent placement in the client. Here, newcomers can find a beginner’s guide, tutorial videos and other tips and tricks to master BitTorrent quickly.

And that’s not all. Thanks to drag and drop sharing, creating and sharing torrents with uTorrent has never been easier.

Users will notice a “drop files to send” area in the bottom left-hand corner where they can drop files into. uTorrent will then automatically create the torrent and start seeding. Users can then get a link to share the torrent with their friends directly. Friends who don’t have uTorrent installed yet get the option to download the torrent bundled with a copy of uTorrent.


uTorrent 3.0′s new features (large)

utorrent

For BitTorrent-savvy users the new uTorrent also has plenty of new features in store. Aside from comments and ratings, uTorrent 3.0 also adds remote access to the core functionality. This means that people can securely control their torrents from smartphones and other devices. In addition, uTorrent now has a portable mode so users can carry it conveniently on a USB-stick.

Some users worry that some of these changes will bloat their favorite BitTorrent client, but uTorrent’s makers contest this and say they are dedicated to keeping uTorrent as light as possible.

“µTorrent’s popularity lies in its simplicity and power. As a result, we’re very selective in the features and apps we add, focusing on maintaining the lightness and speed our community expects,” Jordy Berson, uTorrent’s director of product management at BitTorrent Inc. said commenting on the new release.

Of course we’re also interested in the opinion of uTorrent users themselves also. What do you think? What are the best new features? Is there something you don’t like? Feel free to discuss below.

Related Posts

Previous Post | Next Post

  • Anonymous

    Well, µTorrent is getting quite out of hand…

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000015837379 Sam Hyatt

      oh idk i kinda like it

    • Anonymous

      i agree, this crap should’ve stayed in the mainline client…

      • http://otester.myopenid.com/ PiRat

        They should release a Lite and Full version then everyone’s happy.

        • DINGDonG

          they keep adding crap to it, don’t they realize why people liked it in the first place ???

    • Randomanon

      They fucked up the formerly best and most efficient client into obtrusive (TRAILEERZ! CHAAAATT!!!11) shitware.

      I hope they rot in hell for taking away the last refuge of awesome ease of use + puristic program approach.

    • Anonymous

      What prevents you and others from using older versions?

    • Anonymous

      What prevents you and others from using older versions?

  • Mainframe Xaiver

    “One of the main goals is to appeal more to novice BitTorrent users, who often drop out after using uTorrent only once or twice. ”

    So why is it the average user needs their hand held and to have flashy features in order for something to be useful? Why cant people learn to adapt and learn something new?

    • http://otester.myopenid.com/ PiRat

      Watch Idiocracy, give you an idea why :D

  • http://www.xbomber.co.uk/ Crash

    I always thought that comments were the one useful feature that Azureus featured over utorrent, so it’s nice to have them.

    • brudda

      How the fuck can you comment on something you haven’t even seen yet? How many people are going to download, listen or watch, and then comment? It just doesn’t make sense. 99% of the comments will be useless.

  • http://www.facebook.com/SkinUpMonkey Michael Davidson

    Just to point something out, µTorrent has always been portable.

  • Julian

    I’m just wondering… is nobody using torrent comments so far? Have been using beta 3.0 since it was presented on torrentfreak and after 100+ torrents I have yet to see a single comment :)

    • DarknezzMadnezz

      Have yet to see the update released to general use.
      Even checking for updates via uTorrent does not release 3.0 due to current bugs/issues with client.

    • Foundaa

      I’ve used beta utorrent for a couple months and I’ve seen use of ratings, particularly on popular torrents, not generally comments though. I think it also limits what you can see based on the set of seeds/peers you’re connected to, which could cause ratings to fluctuate and disappear, esp. when you enter seed mode. Either way I see comments as potentially useful for a second judge of quality (first=tracker), and spreading other useful info, like seeding times.

    • Fabiomaltempi

      truly? although not all of them, lots of my torrents have comments. mostly things like “good”, or “will seed”, but still they’re there.
      maybe because i download from demonoid? we have a nice community there

    • Anonymous

      I actually turned them off.

  • Guest

    It’s too late for uTorrent – it”s already bloated since 2.0 versions…

    • brudda

      I agree, I’m still using 1.85 and it works great! Fuck updates, they’re a pain in the ass.

  • Derp

    Bells and whistles. Bells and whistles everywhere.

  • silversurfer

    getting a bloatware app stick with 1.7.7

  • Allison

    Quick update on the µChat Beta – we have taken the app down for a few hours for a quick bug fix. Thank you for your patience.

    Allison @ µTorrent

  • Guest

    New feature in next release:

    - support for Facebook chat

    • dude

      Also, msn etc.

  • Xult

    The majority of peers hate utorrent 3.0.
    They use 2.2.1.
    Bloatware indeed.

    • Anonymous

      lol, I don’t even use 2.2, I stuck with 2.0.4, the last version I find the most stable. uTorrent, despite what others say, IMO is now bloated beyond belief. BitTorrent Inc. should of left it alone instead of raping them into their needs.

      • Xult

        erm… I use Utorrent 2.0.4 :)

        • Herp

          Absolutely, 2.0.4 is here to stay.

      • Anonymous

        lol, I don’t even use 2.0.4, the last version I find good is 1.7.7 :-)

        Seriously, the µTP protocol is raping you where you stand. The option to turn it off is a hoax, or a tweak to make it permit a bit more network load. You can not turn µTP off in µTorrent. Turned off, my speed is still half of what it is with <2.0.

  • Able

    would have thought the main thing needed was anonymity, particularly with the court action being brought against them, as reported here earlier. if they lose the law suit, will anyone be able to still use it? would they want to? ISPs are gonna be looking for the use of torrents even more now than they were before.

    • Anonymous

      Ok just a thought here, but: More novice users = more sharing of legit files = more complaints to ISP’s about why they are trying to prevent aunty Petronella from sharing her vacation videos with her sister in Quebec.

      And i haven’t tested it yet. But why are extra features a problem if they do not slow the program down? Seriously, by the time they make a torrent client that slows my current rig down we will be in 2040.

      • http://www.xbomber.co.uk/ Crash

        Absolutely, I’m all in favour of streamlining software but not necessarily at the expense of adding features.
        I think all the features mentioned add some value to the program.

        When you make a program more efficient, you do it by optimising the code behind the scenes, not pulling out features right, left and centre.

  • SteRipper

    I’ve never seen so many people bitch about a very useful and powerful app in all my days. Bloatware? Please. There are ALWAYS gonna features that users won’t want/use in any program they acquire.

    Just use it for what you need, ignore all the bells and whistles, and enjoy. You don’t need to use them if you don’t want to.

    • Zar

      Is that why the early versions (161, etc) are held in such high regard. Maybe you don’t grok the reason why this client was called muTorrent (not uTorrent) in the first place; it’s because the mu symbol means ‘micro’ as in ‘MicroTorrent’ (as in tiny BT client).

      This tumescent turd doesn’t deserve the name…

  • Ctoon6

    I would like to use qbittorrent, but it does not seem to like downloading some torrents. and ?torrent is closed source and has gotten a little to big for my tastes.

  • Acheron

    Sad to see such a good client go down the drain.

  • Blackjesus

    Yuk R.I.P Utorrent maybe some people might prefer this http://qbittorrent.sourceforge.net/

    • Whitedevil

      That client is awful. Go with Tixati instead.

      • Dan

        Tixati? Hah, I tried it yesterday, it is slow and unresponsive in my netbook compared to utorrent 2.0.4 and the download speed isn’t that impressive.

  • Blackjesus

    Yuk R.I.P Utorrent maybe some people might prefer this http://qbittorrent.sourceforge.net/

  • Leemcc26

    U Torrent obviously don’t care much about what there users want, if they did they would have added anomos !!!!!!!!

    tbh i thought they would have.

    • Anonymous

      Bittorrent is not designed to be anonymous. There’s no way to by anonymous and still be within the torrent protocol.

      If you want to be anonymous, don’t use torrents.

  • Pingback: uTorrent Bugged by Bugs | TorrentFreak

  • Pingback: uTorrent 3.0 ya disponible — Bitelia

  • http://otester.myopenid.com/ PiRat

    I hope they have fixed issue when downloading part of a torrent…

  • Nicke

    Good, but how it’s going with the x64 version? I assume that most users today have x64 os.

  • https://thepiratebay.org/user/manOtor/ manOtor

    I still miss the upload/download arrows in front of the torrent-name in the new release!

    About the new features: I really don’t care if there is bloat, as long as it doesn’t make things slower – I simply ignore/don’t install the features I don’t need.

    But nevertheless I don’t get why a client would need a rating system, or torrents in general. The seeders say it all. Good torrent = many seeders, bad torrent = less seeders. Same goes for the “Health” – what does this feature measure anyway?
    And if I want to chat about torrents, I do so in the forum.
    Streaming? Isn’t that kind of counter productive to the idea of how seeding works?
    If I watch while downloading the file-junks have to be downloaded in the right order.
    But actually (initial) seeding is about distributing as many parts to as many peers as fast as possible, so that the torrent file is “complete” in the swarm as soon as possible.

    But as I said: as long as you can ignore what you don’t like and don’t loose speed over it, it’s fine by me ;)…

    • http://twitter.com/xRDVx xRDVx

      And some of them can be deactivated too, like the comments and ratings (in advanced options, unless “gui.enable_comments” & “gui.enable_ratings” don’t have anything to do with the comments and ratings features). So as you said: if you don’t like it, don’t use them — it’s not like it makes the software slower.

      I like the streaming option as you can begin to watch while downloading if you have a good download speed (all the software does is prioritize the pieces you need for the file you’re streaming). The health feature is what most web-sites show: Relation of seeders and peers, so it’s the same, but while downloading and in your uTorrent window (hint: you can hide it if you don’t like it)

      The rating and comment system are.. well, I’ve yet to see an usage that isn’t covered already by websites but it is a good thing if you take into account we could move from uploading torrents to websites to searching them from DHT (see http://torrentfreak.com/btdigg-the-first-trackerless-torrent-search-engine-110223/ ) I guess if it was also tied up to websites and their comments this COULD be a good thing.

    • DocGerbil100

      For the little status icons next to the torrent names:
      Preferences -> Advanced -> gui.show_status_icon_in_dl_list . :)

      • Mitugoswami35

        thx man ^^

    • Anonymous

      Health is about if all the bits are available and how many copies of them exist. And if we no longer needed the forums and torrent sites we would be harder to stop. With streaming you can check if the file is real and give an audio video rating within 5 minutes after starting a torrent.

    • info101

      wtf are you talking about there are amazing quality movies that just aren’t so popular and there are better software versions with only a few seeders
      you must learn who to judge for your self and just hope that the torrent have enough seeders so that you can download it as quick as possible

  • Pingback: uTorrent 3.0 ya disponible |

  • Pingback: uTorrent Gets Chatty With Milestone 3.0 Release | Links Daily

  • Pingback: uTorrent 3.0 Adds Instant Media Streaming, Drag-And-Drop File Sharing | Lifehacker Australia

  • None

    faggotry.

  • None

    faggotry.

  • Hg

    Whinge, Whinge, Moan, Moan. FFs this is a free bit of software. I realise that you moaners all expect to get what you want when you want and for free, but to complain about bloat is pathetic TBH. 10 years ago, I might have had some sympathy for you, but with the hardware that most of us use nowadays, it wouldn’t even miss a beat if utorrent was twice as bloated. Its not mandatory to upgrade, and a new release wont make the release that you are happy with work less well. Innovation is great, and any new features that have been added have been so following a bit of market research.
    Any new features that encourage new users to become seasoned users have to be welcomed. more seeds, peers & torrents, how bad.
    I don’t use utorrent because i have freenas / transmission, but if i used a windows pc for downloading, i would use it because what i use now is totally featureless.

    • Xult

      I am not moaning.
      Just a statement of fact.
      I will repeat.
      Most peers will not go above 2,2,1.
      In my case I use 2.0.4.
      Tried 3.0 and disliked it.
      And many others seem to agree with me.
      If the user does not want it then it will not get used.
      Market research is useless if all they did was poll among
      a few Americans.
      Might as well conduct the poll in North Korea.

  • Shantara

    I want a torrent app, not this social shit.
    Won’t update, versions 2.x work perfectly for me.

  • Otiel

    Agree with most comments… I don’t expect from my torrent client to do social now… just KISS, it will be better !
    What the fuck do I care to rate torrents or read rates !?

    Staying in 2.2.1

  • Otiel

    Agree with most comments… I don’t expect from my torrent client to do social now… just KISS, it will be better !
    What the fuck do I care to rate torrents or read rates !?

    Staying in 2.2.1

  • GUEST

    A bit of a downer. I chose to use utorrent back in the day because I wanted a small no nonsense client. To see the direction its going in today is lame.

  • UTorrentSucks

    There really should be an open-source client for Windows that would avoid this kind of bullshit. Torrenting should be more along the lines of the Transmission client for Linux, not this nonsense that wants to be a social networking app.

  • UTorrentSucks

    There really should be an open-source client for Windows that would avoid this kind of bullshit. Torrenting should be more along the lines of the Transmission client for Linux, not this nonsense that wants to be a social networking app.

  • Guest

    Yea, I tried utorrent 3 beta and just did not like it at all, the ui is bloated n Fugly.

    Didn’t really like 2.2, till I found a 2.0.4 skin for it & a few UI tweaks, Hate that RSS feed icon, wtf, don’t use feeds n it is there.

  • Anonymous

    Love it, can’t wait to try the ‘drop’ function. Been a long time coming. I can however see where people are screaming about bloatware. I’m not one of them…yet.

    Maybe to appease everyone they should make a custom installation available so people can choose which parts they want to install. That should satisfy everyone.

  • Anonymous

    tinyurl.com/2df4ccp

  • Dan

    I have utorrent v. 1.8.3 in my laptop and v. 2.0.4 in my netbook. These are downgrades from v. 2.2.1 which was horridly bloated.

  • Heytunk

    Ill keep my 2.0.4

    Does torrenting just fine, no need to worry about running through and disabling extensions to the protocol and random stuff whoever was in charge on the day decided to add.
    That and the 2.2+ interface repels me like a 5ft high pile of dog do.

    uTorrent was already one of the most used clients in the world (1st or 2nd depending on how you do your metrics).
    Why screw with something that was working in completely random directions, like social, apps, chat and a new UI?

  • eman rouy

    I stuck with uTorrent up to 2.2.x. Today I downloaded 3.0, saw the installer had doubled in size, and I deleted it. I’m going to downgrade to 2.0.x while I look for a new client. Idc that its still under 1MB. I care that it doubled in size.

    • eman rouy

      1.7.7. 215KB – 1.8.5 283KB – 2.0.4 321KB – 2.2.1 390KB – 3.0RC8 624KB
      Those are installer sizes. 3.0 is the biggest size increase and comes with the most bloatware yet! I can’t wait for 4.0! :) Micro, eh?

      • echo

        so installer size from 2.2.1 to 3.0 increased by over 200 KB.

        this is going to be a major issue 20 years ago.

        • mitu

          now we r using at least 4 GB RAM and 2 TB HDD i5 core those it really matter if they put a little more something

        • eman ruoy

          Did you read my first post? Its not that it increased over 200KB, its that it almost doubled in size. Why did it double? because they added bloatware. Yeah, this really is a “simple”, “lightweight” torrent client… >.>

      • Anonymous

        Haha, yeah and then you download files that are 10 GB…

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Tom-Evans/549591812 Tom Evans

        you actually give a shit about that?

  • Anonymous

    I used qbittorrent for a while and I must say I am definitely a fan.

  • DRuNKeN MaSTeR

    “What started out as a minimalist and no-nonsense client targeted at an already BitTorrent-savvy crowd, has slowly become an application that does far more than downloading alone.”

    Yeah, it’s become a bloated crapware just like Azureus.

    • Anonymous

      I don’t get it, you still have your very small version that you are happy with. So see this as a different client.

  • Pingback: uTorrent 3.0 Adds Instant Media Streaming, Drag-and-Drop File Sharing to Our Favorite BitTorrent Client [Downloads] | That Soviet Guy

  • NiggaBee

    Here are older versions of uTorrent:

    http://www.oldapps.com/utorrent.php

  • Marshal

    If Jordy says it’s ok, then I believe him because he’s the Chief Engineer of the USS Enterprise.

  • Amizfu_35

    They shuld instead add anomos protocol in utorrent

  • Whatever

    Funny…

    Last time i mentioned it was starting to become bloatware most comments where stating that it is not bloatware and/or it is still smaller than most other clients and/or the extra features were only optional by plugins. (In an article about a list of the 10 most popular features to add. If i remember correctly there were quite a few useless things requested there like virus scanner integration)

    Bloatware always starts with a few extra options and then keeps expanding until some developer comes along and finds that he/she can do better. A good example is Nero burning rom which by now is probably larger than what it burns. Now there are quite a number of very SMALL free alternatives to Nero that are sometimes even easier to use.

  • DocGerbil100

    I’m using it now. Although it’s increasingly ugly, a bit bloated and definitely needs more work in a couple of areas, it’s not the train-wreck I feared it would be. I’ll stick with it for a while and see how it goes.

    I suspect a few (not all, just a few) of the people here complaining about the bloaty features are the same trolls who keep signing up to the µTorrent idea bank under different aliases daily to cheat the voting system for exactly those bloody stupid ideas in the first place. It’s amazing how many anons can’t tell the difference between lulz and bone-crushingly dull vandalism.

    If you think some of µTorrent’s features are a bad idea, please do everyone a favour, don’t waste your time complaining here: sign up at the idea bank and vote against them. It doesn’t guarantee that BitTorrent, Inc will listen, but it’s a lot more likely than for purely anonymous complaints made on TF.

  • Anonymous

    tinyurl.com/24n4nqb

  • an0n

    why wont anyone come to my uChat?? damn it think i broke it…..
    ~TORRENT~4:20~ room

  • Anonymous

    “What started out as a minimalist and no-nonsense client targeted at an already BitTorrent-savvy crowd, has slowly become an application that does far more than downloading alone.”

    Which is why I stick with 1.7.7. Also, do you remember the protests around the µTP protocol? It still assrapes all µTorrent >=2.0 users without them even realising their download speeds can be twice as fast. Maybe THAT is why users stop using µTorrent after two times.
    When I download with 3.0, which I like because of the streaming function, I get speeds around 100-400KB/s. With 1.7.7, I get up to speed much faster, and it gives me the full 810KB/s which I get when downloading from websites (with good servers).

    Don’t get me wrong, I love µTorrent and use it exclusively, but some ‘features’ are just complete rubbish.

    • Herp

      “without them even realising their download speeds can be twice as fast.”
      Citation needed.
      I’m maxing out my 25mbit line with utp (ut 2.0.4) quite easily and steadily, thank you very much.

  • Anonymous

    tinyurl.com/24n4nqb

  • shutuputorrent3point0haters

    are you guys nuts, bloatware? the added features probably bloated it by 10 KB, get real, and who the heck does not read comments from sites before downloading a file, safe downloading and avoiding malicious crap… so having that right in the program isn’t a bad idea….

    they add 1 KB and your complaining in this day and age, its still tiny, its still great!

  • morningreign

    I stick with utorrent 1.6.1. I prefer it because it was the last release before embracing the dark side. 173KB and it just works.

  • Pingback: uTorrent 3.0 arrives with streaming and Web UI | Get News, Articles and other Informations

  • Pingback: The Cheap Computer Geek » Blog Archive » uTorrent 3.0 arrives with streaming and Web UI

  • Pingback: uTorrent 3.0 arrives with streaming and Web UI | RegionalForward.info

  • Pingback: uTorrent Gets Chatty With Milestone 3.0 Release | TorrentFreak | NotSoCrazyNews BETA

  • Pingback: uTorrent 3.0 arrives with streaming and Web UI | Christian Media Cross

  • http://profiles.google.com/evil.faerytales evil faerytales

    damn.. how many morons around here..

    Especially “Randomanon” with his:
    >>I hope they rot in hell.

    Fuck you, mister. Developers of UTorrent owe you nothing.

    Now, it what place it’s became bloated in 3.0 ? Streaming – awesome feature ! Comments – im fine with them, could be usefull for tracking shitty torrents. Turn them off if you dont like em.

  • http://profiles.google.com/evil.faerytales evil faerytales

    damn.. how many morons around here..

    Especially “Randomanon” with his:
    >>I hope they rot in hell.

    Fuck you, mister. Developers of UTorrent owe you nothing.

    Now, it what place it’s became bloated in 3.0 ? Streaming – awesome feature ! Comments – im fine with them, could be usefull for tracking shitty torrents. Turn them off if you dont like em.

  • just venting, bear with me

    For God’s sake, those guys STILL DIDN’ T bring back the lower panel to ITS FULL WIDTH??!! I can’t believe it!

    I am still using version 1.7.7 because of this, so I can still fit most parameters in the screen without rolling!

    Why they did that since 1.8? To make the first column deep enough to have APPS?

    Who cares about faggot apps! Put them in some detachable menu!

    It’s like putting the glove compartment behind the wheel of a car, instead of the status indicators!

    Now, quoting author of article:
    “One of the main goals is to appeal more to novice BitTorrent users, who often drop out after using uTorrent only once or twice.”

    If someone drops out after using uTorrent once or twice, GOOD RIDDANCE! They are MORONIC bells-and-whistles/skin addicted losers with bad taste to begin with and are better off from any BT swarm anyway!

    • DocGerbil100

      As far as I know, Options -> Advanced -> gui.tall_category_list has always allowed users to switch the display between full-width-lower-panel and full-height-categories. Perhaps you should have read the manual – or looked in the forum, or Googled it, or just asked someone – at some point in the last two years. :P

      • Helikopte

        DUDE! ARE YOU FUCKING INSANE?! That would involve READING! EVERYTHING I LIKE SHOULD BE THE RE FROM THE START AND EVERYTHING I DON’T LIKE SHOULD BE OPTIONAL!!!

    • Helikopte

      Personally I use homing pigeons to seed and and receive. Totally anonymous, unless some fucker shoots my pigeons and steals my shit. Only happened once though, had to track him down and make him pay for fucking with my uptime.

      Also I doesn’t strain my computer at all, no apps, programs or anything. I save those enormous 500kb for my uncompressed bluray-rips instead.

  • Pingback: uTorrent Gets Chatty With Milestone 3.0 Release - techtime's posterous

  • Pingback: uTorrent 3.0 arrives with streaming and Web UI | Source Of Drivers

  • Pingback: uTorrent 3.0 arrives with cool new features | URLFile Blog

  • Pingback: uTorrent 3.0 arrives with streaming and Web UI | Mohinder's Blog

  • Anonymous

    hope someone at utorrent is reading this. i’m ready to jump on board. btw, i’m speaking ubuntu linux. comprende?

  • Pingback: The Technology Blog: uTorrent Gets Chatty With Milestone 30 Release

  • hoodedhacks

    Deluge anyone? Or Halite. Both are really awesome clients for windows.

    • DocGerbil100

      Deluge is a good client, but – even accounting for µTorrent 3′s slightly increased size – Deluge is still something like a hundred and fifty times larger and feels positively glacial to use (although µT is slowly catching up in the clunkiness stakes :/ ). Despite this, it’s my second-favourite Windows client. :D

      I tried Halite, but it isn’t really a contender at the moment. It seems to be designed for 64-bit machines only – I’m not sure it will ever work properly on older hardware. On my machine, it isn’t functional – it’s just about usable, but with totally broken UI throughout (possibly because it’s expecting some Vista- or Windows 7-specific capabilities) and 90% CPU consumption.

      It’s still very much in development, I think – I look forward to seeing a fully-working version, assuming the devs are developing with 32-bit machines in mind at all. :)

  • Jordy

    Hey, this is Jordy from uTorrent product management. I’m one of many at uTorrent reading your comments. :) Thanks for the helpful comments. A few impressions:

    1) The biggest take-away: how important “speed” is for everyone. I get it, our developers get it. We like speed too. :) Now that we’ve shipped 3.0, we’re focusing for a bit on pure stabilization and speed tasks which we do periodically. But we also consider these things on an ongoing basis with each code change we make. To those who have the understandable fear that we’re spiraling out of control towards useless features and bloat the way so many software products have – we’re not. I know you won’t take my word for it – we have to prove it to you. We’re game for that. :)

    2) Relating to my above comment – bloat is obviously subjective and I don’t want to make any false promises here. So to be clear: Our focus is on keeping your torrenting experience reliable and fast; on making sure you can remove new features you don’t like; and on keeping install size small. Nevermind that most torrent clients are way bigger than we are – you chose us for micro, we need to deliver micro.
    BUT – the above aims do not mean we won’t add new features or expand size. We WILL keep adding features, and for a range of users including new users. Not aimless features, but features directed squarely at improving the way our users can find content, play and share content, and move it to other devices. If you can’t stand ANY size increase and ANY change…that’s okay. See the next point.

    3) Some of you don’t like any change from the legendary 2.04 or 1.7.7 or whatever your perfect version is. That’s cool with us. It’s just like cars: Here in northern California, there are tons of “vintage” cars from 1970′s BMW 2002 tii’s to 1991 Honda Accords LX’s to 1985 Subaru BRATs. People can like what they like, and everyone can drive the software version of their choice. :)

    4) The bad thing about relatively anonymous forums is that comments are depersonalized and thus it’s easier to make those occasional, terrible comments. It’s a very human temptation. First, THANKS to all who keep uTorrent-related forums elevated and call people out who, in moments of passion, make thoughtless comments. We like the passion, but for the very few of you who sometimes get a little too passionate, :) consider if you’d say the same comment in person or not. For example:
    - I’m certain that most if not all of you who had a “beginner” friend who needed extra help using uTorrent would NOT call your friend an idiot unworthy of using uTorrent and send him/her away. You’d probably help them out the same way we’re attempting to help new users out in this new version.
    - And I’m even more certain that if you had the chance to sit face-to-face with one of our amazing developers, people who consider you and what you want on an almost daily basis, you wouldn’t treat them as your personal servants and yell at them when you didn’t get exactly what you wanted like some tyrant king. Let me tell you, the people who develop this client are amazing – dedicated, friendly, smart, and all trying to make a good product.

    Again, I sure appreciate the comments from all of you. We read them and use them to influence product direction, i.e. the comments matter.

    Thanks,

    Jordy (bigfalls on uTorrent forums)

    • Mjkennedy70

      If you do not mind people using old versions of the client, please post these older releases on your web site. At the moment, people have to download them from some unknown and potentially untrustworthy web site or torrent. These executables could have a virus.

    • Mjkennedy70

      If you do not mind people using old versions of the client, please post these older releases on your web site. At the moment, people have to download them from some unknown and potentially untrustworthy web site or torrent. These executables could have a virus.

  • Pingback: What Is Streaming? » uTorrent 3.0 Adds Instant Media Streaming, Drag-And-Drop File Sharing

  • info101

    wtf are you talking about there are amazing quality movies that just aren’t so popular and there are better software versions with only a few seeders
    you must learn who to judge for your self and just hope that the torrent have enough seeders so that you can download it as quick as possible

  • Pingback: What Is Streaming? » uTorrent 3.0 Adds Instant Media Streaming, Drag-and-Drop File Sharing to Our Favorite BitTorrent Client [Downloads]

  • Pingback: uTorrent 3.0 Adds Instant Media Streaming, Drag-And-Drop File Sharing | Torrents & File Sharing News

  • Pingback: uTorrent 3.0 Adds Instant Media Streaming, Drag-and-Drop File Sharing to Our Favorite BitTorrent Client [Downloads] | Torrents & File Sharing News

  • BTGuard - BitTorrent Anonymously

NewsBits

Even more news...

  • The Pirate Bay Isn’t Down Completely, Just Having a Few Issues

    Twitter and Facebook, not to mention the TorrentFreak inbox, are currently alive with complaints that The...

  • Pirate Bay Founder Gottfrid Svartholm on Freedom of Speech

    Freedom of speech is a highly valued commodity, but should people be allowed to say whatever...

  • Blu-ray Anti-Piracy Tech Stops Discs and Promotes Purchases

    An anti-piracy system present in all official Blu-ray players since 2012 has received a fresh update...

  • Foxtel Breeds Pirates by Locking Up Game of Thrones

    One of the main reasons why people turn to piracy is the lack of legal alternatives....

  • UK Student Admits Breaching Sony Copyrights With Leak of PS3 SDK

    Last year an Internet user known as El Nomeo leaked version 3.70 of Sony’s Playstation3 SDK...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

PopularArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.