TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

Wikipedia Mulls Total Blackout to Oppose SOPA

Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales wants to blank out all pages of the online encyclopedia to oppose the pending SOPA anti-piracy bill in the US. Wales, who has asked the Wikipedia community for input on the idea, fears the bill could seriously hurt the Internet and thinks that blanking out Wikipedia will send a strong message to lawmakers.

walesLater this week, the Senate’s House Judiciary Committee will vote on the “Stop Online Piracy Act” (SOPA).

Supporters of the bill say it’s needed to safeguard the interests of rightsholders who claim their businesses are threatened by online piracy. Those opposing are worried that the unprecedented censorship tools it introduces will take out many websites on baseless or faulty claims of copyright infringement.

Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales belongs to the latter group, and behind the scenes he is mulling plans to blank out all Wikipedia pages in protest against the pending SOPA bill. On Saturday he posted a message on his user page asking the community for input on the idea.

Wales explains that the idea of a ‘self-censorship’ protest is inspired by a campaign the Italian Wikipedia community ran earlier this year.

“A few months ago, the Italian Wikipedia community made a decision to blank all of Italian Wikipedia for a short period in order to protest a law which would infringe on their editorial independence. The Italian Parliament backed down immediately,” he writes.

“As Wikipedians may or may not be aware, a much worse law going under the misleading title of ‘Stop Online Piracy Act’ is working its way through [the Senate] on a bit of a fast track.”

“I may be attending a meeting at the White House on Monday along with executives from many other top Internet firms, and I thought this would be a good time to take a quick reading of the community feeling on this issue.”

By blanking out one of the most-visited sites on the Internet, the Wikipedia founder believes the community can send a strong message to their representatives in Washington. With billions of pageviews a month, a Wikipedia protest will definitely be noticed.

“My own view is that a community strike was very powerful and successful in Italy and could be even more powerful in this case,” Wales says.

The response from Wikipedia users to Wales’ plan has been overwhelmingly supportive. However, several users also placed critical notes and wondered whether Wikipedia is the right platform for a political protest.

“I oppose the legislation, but that’s a political view. I don’t ever want Wikipedia to take a political view, no matter how much I agree with it,” Ntsimp writes for example.

Others think that blanking out entire pages might not be an ideal solution, and call for alternative forms of protest such as displaying a black background.

In an update today, Wales responds to some of the points raised in response to the idea. However, he still stands behind the blanking out protest and says that something has to be done quickly before the bill is rammed through in Washington.

“Time is not on our side here,” he says.

Related Posts

Previous Post | Next Post

  • Invalid

    All sites that are against SOPA should do this, at least for a day!

    • Yes

      At the same time! Like a strike!

    • Guest

      And for one day …. millions of mainstream media news stories went without “research”.

      I say do it, not to stop SOPA, but to show what a dependent, know nothing bunch of fucks most journalists are.

    • Julian

      Imagine if google returned “Sorry the SOPA bill would censor this search” for everything, essentially blanking out Google. The ENTIRE world would freak right out. All research would stop for the duration of the ‘outage’.

      • James King

        Unless they decided to search with Bing, Yahoo, Blekko, or any of the other websites that would just be itching to get some marketshare on Google.

      • Kostas

        Quite true.

        However, imagine if it were to do this with Youtube – for just a few hours, e.g.; there is no *equivalent* alternative to Youtube AFAIK; this would make quite an effect, I think.

        • Kostas

          (Ah sorry, meant to be a reply to James King (sub-comment.))

        • An_ominous_anonymous

          Yes, except Youtube and Google don’t care, just see all the rampant censorship by Youtube!! Video’s are blocked on Youtube for having had a copyright claim to them … read that well .. a CLAIM, not a proven copyright infringement. The Megaupload video proves this and I’ve seen many more examples.

          Youtube and Google are not our allies in this in any way, if they are not on the side of the media industry at least they are far too deeply in their grip to do anything meaningful.

        • http://twitter.com/Half_Hour Half Hour Mike

          Google has been censoring certain search results as well.

      • http://twitter.com/icanhazsake Ninja

        That would be nice. Google has to blank for only a few minutes and the msg will reach shitloads of ppl. Good idea indeed.

        • Guest

          Google should upstakes and move to Honkers.

          Kinda like how Halliburton moved to Dubai to avoid all those expensive future law suits over $500 hammers and $100 nails they supplied to the US military.

    • Sopaman

      They are doing it at http://www.deviloid.net

    • http://profiles.google.com/i.see.living.people Oscar Jacobson

      Hell yeah. fuck SOPA.

  • Neotoasty

    Let’s put the fight to them by doing this.

    Even though I think Wikipedia sucks. =P

    • Anonymous

      Wikipedia sucks? I realize it has its issues, but sucks? It is an amazing source of information, regardless of the small number of mistakes in articles.

      • Guest

        I’ll send Neotoasty a subscription to Encyclopaedia Britannica.

        Oh wait, no I won’t – they went broke from being biased, crap and stuck in the 19th century.

        Wake up and smell the 21st(C) digital revolution, you muppet.

      • Neotoasty

        Wikipedia is a joke. Simply because almost none of the information on there is reliable. Small number of mistakes in articles? HAH! Maybe you don’t really look too closely, eh?

        You have to tread with caution in that site because anybody can edit the articles. Therefore anybody could be mis-lead. Pfft, people are going to be so reliant on Wikipedia in a few years it’s sad, if they haven’t already. READ A BOOK!

        And I’m glad they’re starving for donations.

        • Anonymous

          In other words, you want an incredible source of good information shut down because you’re too lazy to check their sources and facts? All those little superscript numbers on the page generally link to sources or references, as well as further reading.

          And if you believe all the information in a book just because it’s on paper, then all you are is naive.

        • Anonymous

          You’re the joke here, buddy.

        • Amy

          Books can have misinformation in them as well…

        • The Dude

          So, “correct” these glaring mistakes then. Yes, anyone can edit the articles, including you. True knowledge is a collaborative effort.

        • TheOiulkj

          So rather than have a page that has been collaborated on by thousands of people, with sources cited, you think that books by a single random “professional” is a better source of information?

          Honestly can’t tell if you’re trolling or severely deprived of brain cells.

    • Shut Up

      Please do tell us why Wikipedia sucks oh almighty one. I won’t say its the most reliable and accurate source of information but in most cases, the information provided is very accurate. Its an outstanding source of information for doing school & university projects and presentations. There is simply no other site on the internet which has information on basically any topic under the sun.

      • Seriously..?

        Okay people this is getting out of hand. The poster clearly typed “I think Wikipedia sucks.” Using “I think” reflects his/her opinion of Wikipedia meaning above poster isn’t forcing his/her opinion down anyone’s throat. ‘I think Wikipedia sucks’ and ‘Wikipedia sucks’ are very different statements. Worry more about SOPA and it’s consequences and worry less about someone who has an opinion different from you own. ?_?

        • 7th_Guest

          Okay then. I think your mom is a filthy, diseased whore. Problem?

      • http://profiles.google.com/steveaustin1971 Michael Langford

        Google actually makes it easy to find the information you want quite easily. What you are talking about is avoiding research and using someone elses… THAT is why wikipedia sucks.

        • Jhloa2

          But most of the time when people google something they click on the wikipedia link it returns…

        • Tesla

          And you went to school and used no books
          And you have no books written by others in your world
          How did you ever manage to turn that typewriter on????

          calm down Bamm Bamm…..

        • Shut Up

          9 out of 10 times when I search something, the first link google returns is a link to wikipedia. That shows how comprehensive the site’s database is. I personally never search directly on Wikipedia but Google gets me there anyway. Wikipedia is like a all in one for all you want to know on a topic. You don’t have to consult 5 different sites but that option is always open when you want more detailed information.

        • Anonymous

          Google makes it easy to find the proper Wikipedia page.

          But next time I’m doing some research (you should look up the word), I’ll be sure to start from scratch.

          First I will discover the base elements…

        • Shut Up

          You don’t need to teach me anything about research. I doubt you even passed school let alone doing research.

      • Neotoasty

        No, but it’s sounding like to me you’re making it out to be the most reliable source of information. You wanna know what people like me did back in time if we gave a shit doing projects for school? Some of us got off our asses and took the time to actually pick up a book and read about whatever it is we want to know.

        Wikipedia is a sorry excuse of a replacement.

        • An_ominous_anonymous

          Yeah, I’ll go read a book about developments in web technology in the last year. You funny person. Books are not a complete research solution to anything, it would be quite stupid actually in this day and age to rely on them (books are written by human beings, a lot of times by less people than a wiki … this can also be a measure of reliability). On the other hand, if you are doing proper research you can use wikipedia as a starting point (finding things to investigate, use the wiki’s sources for unclouded information if they’re proper) and other services like Google Scholar for more legit stuff.

        • MD3

          Wikipedia is an awesome STARTING POINT for research, not the ending point of it!

          I don’t care if some idiot is cheating his/her homework by copying frmo it, it’s the teacher’s duty to go see if it was plagiarized from there.

          Now go back to your troll cave.

    • Jazsuelo

      its been proven that the error rate of wikipedia is about the same as the encyclopaedia britannica. as an encyclopaedia, it does what it is supposed to do. it gives a brief, general overview of a subject and provides the reader with links (and footnotes!) for further investigation in chosen subject. its not supposed to be the hub of human knowledge, its a guide.

  • Admin

    bad ass, stick it to them

  • http://www.facebook.com/AussieKnight1990 Brad Morris

    Fuck yes do this!

  • Anonymous

    Awesome move. This should light a fire under the users and get the bill into the public eye.

    Every time a bill like this fails, the global resolve against censorship is strengthened.

  • http://www.facebook.com/AussieKnight1990 Brad Morris

    YES DO THIS!

  • Aboxforspam

    Do it. Despite all the attention it gets in the circles we frequent, there are still millions who don’t know anything about it. SOPA threatens the entire internet, including vast swathes of Wikipedia. Do it.

  • http://Operation-DarkSky.askaboutit.com Needlez™

    I think if Google has some part in fighting censorship they should go offline for a day just to prove what this bill will do. If Google doesn’t support us anymore then they should be axed at all costs. All sites that support censorship need to be axed. And all against should help us by showing what would happen if they went offline. I wish people would realise the potential damage this bill can cause. At this current moment me and a team of college students and a few others are working on making a search engine that will still allow for looking of censored material, and will keep users totally anonymous. We need all the help we can get with the engine, proxys, and other ideas are welcome. Check us out. Https://www.ops-shutdown.org We are fighting to make sure if its shutdown we will still have it. We thank you.

    • http://profiles.google.com/zerianis10 Christopher Kidwell

      Google is pissed over this law as well, but Google is first and foremost a business….. Wikipedia is a non-profit.

      • http://Operation-DarkSky.askaboutit.com Needlez™

        If google is so pissed then go offline for an hour to show what’ll happen like itll hurt them?? really they’re like the largest search engine giant out there. Plus it would piss alot of people off. Another thing is I don’t think google is all to concerned anymore seeing as how they censor types of words in the auto fill feature.

        • Nhaskins

          They could just do an anti-SOPA doodle. That in itself would land all over the news.

        • Srsly?

          They’re pissed.

          But not pissed enough to throw away millions of dollars, lose 10% of their userbase and adverisers to other sites that are more reliable. Setting your store alight in protest may be a strong message, but it also leaves you trying to pick up the pieces for quite a while.

      • Chris Tollman

        …but Google could have everyone’s first search of a given day blocked (along with a notice on the harmful effects of SOPA), and a simple refresh could allow you to proceed.

        Google stands to lose a ad revenue from plenty of blogs and sites that are aggressively (and unconstitutionally) taken down by SOPA. Google’s for-profit nature is exactly why they should be doing this.

        • Shut Up

          I agree with your approach. Its definitely better that way than taking the site offline which will inconvenience everybody.

    • Anonymous

      Censor sites that don’t agree with our anti-censorship sentiments?

      Um… yeah…

      • http://Operation-DarkSky.askaboutit.com Needlez™

        I’m not saying we censor them… im saying if they support us then they should go quiet for a day or so just to prove what’ll happen if this bill passes. If they aren’t with us then oh well my opinion is that site will give in an fail. Sorry if I didnt explain well enough for you.

        • Anonymous

          If Google doesn’t support us anymore then they should be axed at all costs.

          Axed means executed. So for example, you would want to get rid of Google for not supporting us. Aka, censor them.

          Unless by “axed” you meant you’d give them a scornful look. :P

      • Chris Tollman

        Think of it as more like a ‘silent treatment’ protest… like ignoring your begging child to teach them a lesson.

        • http://Operation-DarkSky.askaboutit.com Needlez™

          Yea. maybe axed was a bad choice of words. Sorry. But yes like what Chris is proposing. Like basically just people will stop using Google and then maybe Google will get the picture and start helping us more. Does that explain things better. Guess I should word things better for people.

        • Shut Up

          “Like basically just people will stop using Google and then maybe Google will get the picture…”

          Google has never claimed that they support SOPA. So what ya on about? Whether they protest or not, its upto them. You can’t wank out a person from his home and force him to protest on behalf of you. They have the freedom to decide. And for Pete’s sake stop dreaming people will stop using Google lol.

    • Snell

      your comments remind me of the bush stand point. join us or die. just wanted to say….. it didnt end well for him.

    • Travis E Cross

      Check out the project FreedomBox, you may find a fit for your search engine.

    • Shut Up

      So you say all sites must take their sites offline for a day to protest SOPA? Nobody can be neutral or protest silently or protest by other means? Very close minded approach you have, needless to say. Taking Google offline even for an hour will cause massive inconvenience worldwide, a whole day is out of question.

      • http://Operation-DarkSky.askaboutit.com Needlez™

        Not saying that. You people should quit assuming
        Dominick

  • Lost

    No… No… NO!!! I WANT MY WIKIPEDIA! WANT IT WANT IT WANT IT WANT IT

    • Chris Tollman

      …exactly the point. If your pathetic legislators weren’t supporting SOPA, you could have your Wikipedia.

      • Anonymous

        And if those pathetic legislators have their way, we’ll lose Wikipedia whenever a troll decides to “report” it for infringement.

    • Zsdf

      I think we should do this. i know wiki is not political but if a bill threatens your existence action is required. Doing nothing is agreeing. Evil wins when good men do nothing, ect.

  • Alyssa Blindy

    I think all websites against SOPA should get together and go quiet for maybe 8 or 10 hours. I agree with wickipedia on this one. Blanking out could be a great idea.

    • Johnny

      If Google did this no other website would have to – as most people need Google to access them sites in the first place ^_^

      But Google wont – as they’ll be scared of losing visitors – yet if they don’t do something SOPA might actually pass and then they’ll lose 100% of their traffic from being taken offline ;)

  • Anonymous

    Their businesses aren’t threatened by piracy, their businesses are threatened by their utter refusal to provide what the market is demanding. And so they seek highly special privilege, which infringes upon the rights of all citizens, so they can maintain profitability for their outmoded business models.

    Fuck… That.. Shit..

  • Test

    finally a person of action not empty words

    • http://www.GregoryKohs.com Gregory Kohs

      You obviously don’t know Jimmy Wales very well. Remember when he was caught hiring a fraudulent “theology professor” named “Essjay”, and his promise to the media was that Wikipedia would develop a “credentials verification” program? No such program was ever delivered. Remember when he promised (for years) that Wikipedia would “soon” implement a “flagged revisions” or “pending changes” feature to cut down 90% or more of the vandalized edits on the site? No such feature was ever adopted by Wikipedia. He is almost entirely a person of empty words, not action.

      • Guest

        Flagged revisions are currently being tested on other languages.

        • http://www.GregoryKohs.com Gregory Kohs

          We look forward to their being rejected by those languages’ respective communities, too.

    • Anonymous

      I see what you did there.

  • Anonymous

    I would say “go for it” when they do need a good reminder how much good stuff the Internet has gave us. It will in fact be a beautiful thing to witness when millions of Americans will only see an anti-SOPA message.

    This day will also be funny to see when so many people will lack their usual “brain extension” leading to all kinds of difficulty trying to reference that what they could not quite remember… myself included.

  • Reader

    If only Google and Bing would do the same :( If major search engines did that without stabbing eachother in the backs(i.e. someone backing out after the first has blocked access in order to gain new users), then I think that would make the issue ALOT more known than just Wikipedia..

    • Johnny

      Facebook/Twitter censoring the words people write is also very effective.

  • Pingback: Wikipedia vill censurera alla artiklar som protest mot SOPA - Sebastian

  • GuiHarrison

    Jimmy Wales is awesome!

  • Anonymous

    DO IT! God that bill will have extremely negative international consequences and I want it killed.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_XH3LPSTXI5EF34FEBB5NTMQJMA Jeff Walt

    Jimmy’s mug begging for donation on each page like an annoying street bum makes me want to choose a different street and use Wikipedia only as a last resource.
    Which often it is.
    I don’t think SOPA people could care less about it either.

    • The Dude

      So you like browsing Wikipedia and letting everyone else pay for it? Furthermore you outraged by a simple request to pay for what you use? Sounds like you’re the annoying street bum living off of everyone else’s charity. A tragedy you can’t see the irony in your comment.

  • Pingback: El fundador de la Wikipedia propone vaciar todas las páginas como protesta contra SOPA [ENG]

  • Pingback: Wikipedia Mulls Total Blackout to Oppose SOPA | We R Pirates

  • http://blockaid.me BlockAid DNS

    If it helps lawmakers understand the threat that this horrible piece of proposed legislation poses, then I’m all for it!

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000617943487 Máté Bikfalvi

    If they do it, next time if they’ll ask for money I’ll donate.

    • http://twitter.com/icanhazsake Ninja

      That makes two of us.

  • Anonymous

    the US government, or at least a big part of it, has definitely got Google in it’s sights. if it were to shut down, even for a day, the message it would send would be phenomenal. think of the businesses that would be hard pressed to operate. think of the financial markets that would be unable to get up to date information that they require. think of the effects on the economy. it takes moves like this to bring home how much Google is needed and relied on, worldwide, not just in the US. trouble is, it just wont happen! Google doesn’t seem to have the balls it once had, or the clout. look at what it has done to try to keep certain industries happy. that hasn’t happened, with just more and more being expected of it to fight a fight it shouldn’t have to.

  • Pingback: SOPA: What You Don’t Want « Down on the Pharm

  • Anonimouse

    Your right Google is a big enough player to have some affect It should shut down its search the day before the vote and keep it down until this POS has been rejected.

  • http://about.me/jthomp jthompson

    I say go for it!

    • Guest

      Dear ICANN please stop the internet world wide for a day to address and counter act this SOPA bill.

      Amen!

  • Pingback: Notrackingme | Proxy » Wikipedia Mulls Total Blackout to Oppose SOPA

  • Anonymous

    It would be funny if someone in the senate went to Wikipedia something that day :D

  • Roberto

    Switch off the servers for a week. You’ll save thousands of bucks.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_XH3LPSTXI5EF34FEBB5NTMQJMA Jeff Walt

    Actually if Jimmy would invite every Wikipedia visitor to sign anti-SOPA petition or do any other action to add a counted voice – it would have a better mass positive effect.
    “I won’t let you access wikipedia because SOPA is bad” just doesn’t make any sense.

    • EG

      But the proposed method has more of an effect. Getting people to sign a petition really isn’t as effective as causing an actual inconvenience.

  • Pingback: Strike! Wikipedia founder floats idea of site blackout to protest SOPA | VentureBeat

  • Anonymous

    Awesome idea go for it!!!

  • Riptide Tempora

    The only pages that shouldn’t be blanked are the articles on SOPA, PIPA, PROTECT IP, the 2012 Defense Authorization Act, and a list of the United State’s history of censorship. Every other page should link only to those 5, and they should be protected from vandalism.

    • Guest

      Only 2 translations available for SOPA page. WTF is going on?

      EVERYBODY START TRANSLATING THE PAGES OF “MAFIAA ACTS” TO YOUR OWN LANGUAGE

    • Anonymous

      Leave the Chuck Norris page intact as well.

  • Pingback: Strike! Wikipedia founder floats idea of site blackout to protest SOPA : Marketers-Network

  • Daniel

    Dear Wikipedia, if you do this I will send you money.

  • Guest

    This will be amazing if he does it. Millions and millions of people use wikipedia so the message will spread very fast. He should blank out the pages for a month or 2

  • Larrymiller

    Nothing the people do can stop this bill, the US government is bought and paid for already and it’s laws are being written by Corporations. Even your president Obongo is a paid for puppet.

    • Yondee

      You realize that the Obama administration is opposed to both of these bills right?

  • Peter

    Dear Wikipedia, why is it even a question of IF you should do this? It MUST be done.

  • TelezarZ

    Yes, do it Wikipedia ! Too bad that Google and Facebook dont follow this example..

  • Pingback: Remains of the Day: The FBI May Be Using Carrier IQ to Track Suspects [For What It's Worth]

  • Esn

    Even the existing copyright laws are being used to censor journalists. Check this out:
    http://thesecondalarm.com/2011/12/12/citigroup-suppressing-memo/

  • Pingback: Nerd Nightly News - TDW Geeks

  • Anonymous

    I’d go with the black background since Wikipedia is vital to many people. Never know when someone might need urgent information. The black background gets the point across without preventing users from getting information.

    • Leroy

      Black background is racist man, why be dissing against Blacks man yo, you b lokin’ fo fight yo.

      • Anonymous

        Fine! blue backgrounds. Let the Pandora people come get offended instead. *if I were white I’d be pissed about all the white backgrounds tho…just sayin*
        ….uh…lol lol no racism intended, in all seriousness

        • Guest

          I hate blue! LMAO

  • Other World

    What about those of us who aren’t from the US? Will we all still be affected, even though the american bill would have no effect in our jurisdictions?

    • Kevin

      You know Americans, they will push their stupid laws onto others, they can’t help it.

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_PXX4S66KOUIGIKTTIMV3CBGO7Y Colin

      Do you ever look at a site with a .com URL, torrentfreak.com for instance? Oh yes we’d all be affected as the American empire’s tentacles stretch all over the world! Ask Rojadirecta, the fully legal Spanish website…

      • Other World

        I asked if those of us who don’t live in the US would be affected by the Blackout. Not whether we, as a globalized entity, are affected by American commerce. There’s a big difference. If you choose to do business in the US, then that’s your prerogative. But it’s also your responsibility to abide by its laws, no matter how crazy they may be.

    • http://www.xcopfly.com Dan

      .com .net .org .edu are subject to United States. So you can have stuff hosted in another country but you lose your domain name.

  • guest

    But it’s finals week, how the hell am I supposed to study? :(

    • Guest

      Tell your school that you can’t study because of SOPA.

    • http://www.xcopfly.com Dan

      You use Wikipedia for finals? Sad higher education allows this now…

    • http://silicoxvalley.com person287

      Google Cache?

  • Pingback: Ten and Two | Notes To Self

  • My name is H

    Just make a script that replaces random words with black bars. Enough that no page view would escape. When a “redacted” word is clicked, take the user to a page about SOPA.

  • Darkstar77

    heres a link everyone to fight against SOPA/PIPA WE NEED TO SEND A VERY STRONG MESSAGE TO CONGRESS THAT WE WONT STAND FOR THIS I HOPE WIKIPEDIA DOES THE BLACKOUT AND THAT SHOULD TELL THESE PEOPLE SOMETHING HERES THE LINK https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/12/stand-and-fight-week-action-against-censorship

  • Anonymous

    Doesnt seem to me like those two will ever get along.
    http://www.Total-Privacy [dot] US

  • Darkstar77

    IF ANYONE WANTS TO CONTACT CONGRESS TO STOP SOPA/PIPA PLEASE CALL 202-224-3121 WE MUST STOP THESE BILLS WE CANT LET THESE BILLS PASS

  • Dan

    They should only black out the United States, since we’re supposed to be a free country, not one ruled by a Hussein.

  • Pingback: Strike! Wikipedia founder floats idea of site blackout to protest SOPA | Tech News Aggregator

  • Jpontantas69

    sorry to say, but that’s a really dumb idea. If anything just blank the front page and say “This is what SOPA will do”. Now wikipedia may be full of misproperly cited info that may not be true in the strictest sense, however people do rely on it. As an encyclopedia website it should remain as unbiased as possible and not use actual pieces of info as hostages.

    • Yondee

      It is probable that if SOPA or PIPA passes this Encyclopedia would get shut down. Are you saying that despite this fact they should not shut down information for a day to make a point, even it it helps the same information to be displayed indefinitely?

  • noko

    Facebook should do this too.

    But not temporarily, pref. forever.

  • http://www.xcopfly.com Dan

    It’s just a silly and impractical bill. Wikipedia, a nonprofit, will have to employ lawyers 24/7. It’s just impractical to allow the United States with the thousands of edits, vandalizations, and submissions. My guess is that Wikipedia and YouTube will leave their sites unchanged and will fight this to the Supreme Court. No time in history has every business in the country been forced to be no-wage lawyers for 5 companies.

  • Kevin

    Why don’t sites just leave all US hosting servers? Let them have their garbage and the good sites can be hosted elsewhere. US is a fascist country, we shouldn’t host sites there anyway.

    • Grigorey Istonof

      Don’t blame the people for what our government does! Some of us are trying to stop it. It’s the last three administrations who’ve been trying to turn us into Britain!

    • Pelouze

      The “good” sites you refer to would be ghost towns without all the US media they share for profit.

      How many other countries have as much of their media pirated as the US ?

  • Kevin

    Why don’t sites just leave all US hosting servers? Let them have their garbage and the good sites can be hosted elsewhere. US is a fascist country, we shouldn’t host sites there anyway.

  • http://twitter.com/jianxioy Daryl Yeo

    Yes! Do it! But only after my finals!

  • http://twitter.com/jianxioy Daryl Yeo

    Yes! Do it! But only after my finals!

  • Anonymous

    DONATE…. WIKIPEDIA….. NOW

  • Anonymous

    DONATE…. WIKIPEDIA….. NOW

  • James

    It needs to be done and now! It is an awesome idea for sure! No BS black backgrounds, that is only a minor irritant at most. Blank the pages ALL of them. Will it hurt/inconvenience the users? YES and that is the WHOLE POINT. It shows just how damaging censorship in ANY form is.

    Only with such an extremely drastic move, can our voices against these laws be heard.

  • Pingback: Wikipedia Considers Blackout To Protest SOPA « waweru.net

  • Cody Wang

    I hate SOPA, but oh god, Wikipedia, please don’t do this… I need you to finish a couple of big assignments before winter break :(

  • none

    The people making joking comments about needing Wikipedia to finish finals exams, etc. are starting to piss me off. This isn’t a joke. If SOPA were around 10 years ago, you’d still be running around today to the actual brick and mortar library looking at actual *books* or otherwise scrounging around the ‘net looking for stuff. Wikipedia, YouTube, Facebook, and probably half the sites you rely on now wouldn’t exist because some idiot “copyright holder” would have been able to financially strangle those sites without any hearing or recourse.

    I say do it.

  • Mark

    Yes, do it.

  • Rekrul

    I support blanking out the entire site, but I doubt it will make any difference. The US government really doesn’t care what its people think. It only cares about the corporations that give it money.

    The politicians will probably see the blanked out site and think “Oh how cute! The widdle web site thinks it matters…”

  • Anonymous

    Idea: Google “censors” it’s search result as people have suggested.
    But, they also link to the Wikipedia article about SOPA, which incidentally is also “censored”.

    Powerful double whammy.

    • http://twitter.com/akuma_river Brandelyn

      They will more likely link it to the http://americancensorship.org/ website which those who are blanking out websites are doing.

  • Pingback: Internet companies opposed to SOPA by amsika - Pearltrees

  • Excds

    Do it! Blank it out!

    If only Google would do it too. Imagine a work day without access to Google and Wikipedia?

  • Jesse almendarez

    We need a demonstration on all questions in a simulated situation with 3 parts. And they must all pass atleast a 60% pass fail score, to be fair to reasons, ability on an overall average, and how it will effect our countries income. Talk to me in person for security detail.

  • Pingback: Jimmy Wales quiere plantar la Wikipedia contra la SOPA

  • Pingback: Wikipedia funderar på att släcka ner på grund av SOPA | iPortal

  • getoffayaweebassa

    wiki is the holy Grail of the internet. shut it down for 5 minutes and we are like,wtf no wiki? please, do as you say, but a minutes downtime will be enough for most of us, i mean, what would you do if you couldn’t look up malkoviches losses in the madoff scheme?

  • Truther

    Hope they follow through.

  • Pingback: Jimmy Wales está dispuesto a dejar en blanco la Wikipedia en oposición a SOPA: Alt1040 #iMAPAS — #iMAPAS

  • http://twitter.com/icanhazsake Ninja

    DailyMotion?

    But I can see your point. It would be nice if the users were greeted with a seizure page in their first access of the day and a big red link written: THIS IS NOT REAL BUT COULD BE WITH SOPA. CLICK TO SEE DETAILS. Then a small link written “I don’t care if youtube gets shut down, take me to the main page already.”

    LoL

  • LOLZ-WIKI

    It’s the only way to inform the public about the SOPA…No one really heard about COICA and what not the MPAA has tried to put through.

    I’m a bit of a pessimist when it comes to this, so I think the politicians WILL ram this bill through and implement it – Then users can piss all over their grave and cry foul when it is TOO LATE.

  • Pingback: Strike! Wikipedia founder floats idea of site blackout to protest SOPA

  • Pingback: Jimmy Wales está dispuesto a dejar en blanco la Wikipedia en oposición a SOPA - La Isla Buscada

  • Carolyn Blake

    Sadly, the people pushing this censorship will neither care nor be affected if Wikipedia disappears. In fact, they would probably rejoice.

    • Yondee

      The intended audience is not the SOPA/PIPA lobbyists, it is the everyday Wikipedia users who do not know that there is even a vote going on that could affect their daily lives.

  • WmDan

    What a nightmare piece of legislation! Go to this page before it is also banned:

    http://www.UnambitiousUs.com – The Online Magazine for Time Wasters

    Movies, Games and Sports – now with YouTube Clip of the Day!
    Get your own stuff published!
    No ads, no bs.

  • Anon

    I think you are missing the point.
    The larger point is that the process that will eventually reveal how merchandise on the internet will be protected so it can be taxed and sold is finally underway after years of unaddressed looting.

    Enjoy your “internet” as you have it while you have it.
    Someday when the net is secured in the same way all other realms and aspects of community are secured we’ll look back at the pirate anarchy and wonder why we gave so much time to this in the first place. Fight a losing battle if you wish. Regulation that secures commerce is coming, maybe not now, maybe not SOPA, but it’s inevitably coming.

    And all you do is demand “freedoms” to take free copies online so as to compel stricter law and greater punishment in the long run. And you think this is wise.

    Anyone who honestly believes the internet will remain a wild west of fraud and infringement in the future is an idiot. And everyone here knows it.

    • Anon

      Copyright monopoly law undermines commerce and the free market.

      http://levine.sscnet.ucla.edu/general/intellectual/againstfinal.htm

      • Anon

        Tell it to the judge.
        Did you really post that pointless, dumbass link here? lol

        • Anon

          Like the reviews for the book say, yes, Judges should read the book. Judges are heavily propagandised by the theiving copyrightist scum too, and as such, yes, I’d easily find a way to enter the book into the court records and get the judge to read it.

          It is common to argue that intellectual property in the form of copyright and patent is necessary for the innovation and creation of ideas and inventions such as machines, drugs, computer software, books, music, literature and movies. In fact intellectual property is a government grant of a costly and dangerous private monopoly over ideas. We show through theory and example that intellectual monopoly is not necessary for innovation and as a practical matter is damaging to growth, prosperity and liberty.

    • I am Spock

      Are you really this fucking stupid of a dickhead naturally…..or did your mother drop you on your head when a child????

      Wait, I know, you hung around in Steve Jobs reality distortion field too long and now cant go back to normal!!

      Sucks being you.

      • Anonymous

        Yes, he really is this stupid.

        That, or he is indeed a pro-pirate trolling in order to make every reader think the pro-copyright crowd are all incompetent fanatics with lackluster potty training.

        Unfortunately, judging from public statements made by official MPAA/RIAA CEO’s, he’s not far off the markl of what they are actually saying.

    • Anonymous

      As usual a lot of irrelevant nonsense backed by lack of fact, personal opinion, and the idea that information control can work.

      No, seriously. SOPA and any other bill like it will be completely ineffective in stopping copyright infringement. It won’t even dent it.

      However, the bill will be abused and impose a serious threat for any fully legitimate user or business dumb enough not to adapt their business to use the same toolset as used by the pirate crowd. So in essence all this will do is encourage more people to become pirates and share in our technology.

      From any civil liberty perspective SOPA is simply imminent disaster. For the pirates, its actually in practical effect a total win.

  • Anonymous

    phlpn.es/829r8s

  • John Petersen

    Yes, do it. I like Wikipedia and use it regularly, but I can go without for a day in order to support such an important statement. Wikipedia is in a rare position of visibility to both the people and the government. I applaud them for cashing in on their influence on such an important issue.

  • Pingback: Jimmy Wales está dispuesto a dejar en blanco la Wikipedia en oposición a SOPA | EmaCorp News

  • Anonymous

    what ever it takes to protect us from SOPA.
    This bill well destroy hundreds, if not thousands of legitimate online businesses.

  • Pingback: Strike! Wikipedia founder floats idea of site blackout to protest SOPA | Social Network Background Check

  • Archaeus

    We think too much trying to be politically correct and act too little this day. It`s sad … Just do it! That is how the revolutions are born. A bunch of people have and idea that they think is correct and they act upon it.
    Close the damn Wiki for a day or more! Close Google! Close what ever it takes to make them hear you!!!

  • Anonymous

    Here is a list of websites which should participate in this blackout: http://www.alexa.com/topsites

    If they go out for 2 hours, announced beforehand and a counter + visitor counter on the page meanwile, I’m sure they’ll make a huge statement.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_XH3LPSTXI5EF34FEBB5NTMQJMA Jeff Walt

    “I will close public library (so to speak) for people because lawmakers are doing something wrong. And this action of mine will make lawmakers to stop doing what they are doing, because they don’t want my library to be closed for people”.

    Does it make any sense?

    • Yondee

      It makes sense closing the public library to oppose a law that would censor the books inside. It gives the message: “It is possible that, without your action, this inconvenience will become permanent.”

  • Pingback: Wikipedia evalúa “borrarse” en protesta por la ley SOPA - FayerWayer

  • Donohue235

    Yes, do whatever you can to protect your users from government-imposed censorship. While I’m not certain our “leaders” will get the message directly, the blackout would alert countless Wikipedia users of a frightening reality they are completely unaware of or misinformed about.

  • Pingback: SOPA gets in your eyes « Short and Spiky

  • Anonymous

    People may take offense about wikipedia’s actions, but if nothing is done to publicly show that the people DO NOT want this law passed, they will take notice rather than just ignoring the background complaints and listening to the lobbies who want this law passed.

    Oh and if SOPA is passed, then there is a fair to good risk of wikipedia getting itself pulled from the net directly…. so a visible action really needs to be taken and to get people talking. Take down wikipedia in the world for 3-5 days with just a banner explaining for each country the reach and implications of SOPA. *that* will get people talking – and it would probably be one of the biggest ad campaigns the world has ever known!

  • Pingback: Jimmy Wales está dispuesto a dejar en blanco la Wikipedia en oposición a SOPA – PiuraLinux Blog

  • Pingback: Jimmy Wales está dispuesto a dejar en blanco la Wikipedia en oposición a SOPA « Carvajal Computación

  • Pingback: Instapundit » Blog Archive » PROTESTS: Wikipedia Mulls Total Blackout to Oppose SOPA. “Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales wants to b…

  • Pingback: Morning Coffee with David Farrell, December 13

  • Anonymous

    From the article: “I oppose the legislation, but that’s a political view. I don’t ever want Wikipedia to take a political view, no matter how much I agree with it,” Ntsimp writes for example.

    This is the problem with allowing 15-year-olds to weigh in on this. It’s a political matter that *directly affects Wikipedia* and this genius doesn’t think Wikipedia should take a stance on it?

    • 0verlord

      Furthermore, Wikipedia is taking a political stance by EXISTING. From the very beginning it was an idealistic project. Therefore, it seems perfectly appropriate for Wikipedia to stage a political protest against censorship.

      I for one will be severely disappointed if they choose not to take a stand.

  • Pingback: Anonymous

  • Guest

    I oppose!!! piracy is always a medium to control the higher costs of products. Even in Wikipedia… Some “autors” has extracted and modified info from articles in another places… that kind of piracy is “legal” because the original info is completely modified and just posted in Wikipedia… this is why Wikipedia is just a site to know better something that is unknow in a very fast way, but not a good source of information to put it as reliable source of information for a formal investigation… Piracy??? jajaja!!! bigger international corporations have their success based on piracy movements… don´t fuck with this crap!!! This is something that everybody knows but nobody talks about it… Even the good pirates has to learn, investigate, even help others to make a good piracy act… Go to tell this iniciative to the Chinese goverment… they completely agree the piracy in their country, they use international laws to fuck other countries and they don´t respect any international investigation and invention and the world is flooded of their pirate products… If you can see, piracy is not just a matter of cibercrime.. is a huge mistake that the world needs to keep working… because thanks to the piracy, many other people have jobs and the possibility to bring food to their houses, when great corporations don´t give a shit for this damned people… piracy brings opportunities… Just a opinion

    • http://www.xcopfly.com Dan

      “Some “autors” has extracted and modified info from articles in another places… that kind of piracy is “legal” because the original info is completely modified and just posted in Wikipedia… this is why Wikipedia is just a site to know better something that is unknow in a very fast way, but not a good source of information to put it as reliable source of information for a formal investigation…”

      So school papers and college theses are piracy too?

      • 0verlord

        It seems that using a dictionary is piracy, too… Just saying.

  • Pingback: A Web Celebrity-Spotting Guide to the Latest Anti-SOPA Site | Con Games

  • 99posts

    DO IT – DO IT – DO IT IT WILL WORK! along with a caption of why of course. “…due to the sopa bill” ‘which is a corporate lie to censor and control content ie; you’

  • Guest

    I donated to Wikipedia, and I support them going dark for a day.

  • MAFALDA

    sopa AGAIN???
    JAJA
    JEJE.

    • Guest

      Eres quien creo que eres? Chih @ Bach#3

  • Advanced

    Unplug USA for month better

    • Anonymous

      The beef would spoil. :(

  • Pingback: Wikipedia evalúa “borrarse” en protesta por la ley SOPA « Jhonny Valgreen News

  • Pingback: Jimmy Wales está dispuesto a dejar en blanco la Wikipedia en oposición a SOPA | www.Faltariamas.com - www.Faltariamas.es

  • Pingback: Wikipedia threatens blackout over anti-piracy bill

  • Pingback: Wikipedia evalúa “borrarse” en protesta por la ley SOPA

  • Anonymous

    Yeah well anyone could just mirror the Wikipedia content.

  • Chris Shaeffer

    Now get Google to participate.

  • Pingback: Jimmy Wales considers blacking out Wikipedia to protest SOPA | Ebooks on Crack

  • Anonymous

    This is crucial. It’s Big Brother versus Freedom.

  • Pingback: What’s So Wrong With SOPA?

  • Dan Rohr

    Jimmy-John Galt. Sounds good to me. If I were brave enough – as I think Jimmy is – I’d block government access, indefinitely, too.

  • Pingback: A Web Celebrity-Spotting Guide to the Latest Anti-SOPA Site

  • Pingback: Pure Decking 0049 Show Notes |

  • Pingback: Scientists Make "God Particle" Announcement, Brazil Gets iTunes Upgrade, Google Maps Street View Explores Post-Tsunami Japan

  • Pingback: genool.ueuo.com» Blog Archive » Wikipedia Bethinks Total Blackout to Oppose SOPA

  • http://twitter.com/SisterSebaceous Timmy

    Instead of a global blackout, blackout Wikipedia to US-based IP addresses only.
    Better still: black out just to IP addresses from giant ISPs that support the bill.

  • Pingback: Wikipedia Mulls Total Blackout to Oppose SOPA « Fresh Coffee News

  • Neotoasty

    To graws:

    You’re proving my point. People are too lazy and stupid to find cold hard facts because they’re under the illusion that wikipedia knows all. Lol…just….lol. Whatever lazyass, Wikipedia isn’t everything.

  • Pingback: Wikipedia Could Go Dark to Oppose SOPA Anti-Piracy Bill | Dice Blog Network

  • Pingback: Get Clean with some Water and SOPA | digitalamerica_proudtogame

  • Anon

    Do it.

  • MD3

    Just do it!

    But make to black out ALL LANGUAGES!!!

    This bill would affect the WORLD.

  • Just do it!

    1 day is too little!

    A WEEK AT LEAST.

  • Anonymous

    I’d bet money that if SOPA passes, that the country is going to go to the Senate and House and start ‘re-electing’ the people ourselves.
    I, for one, am gonna move to Canada when Im older, because I refuse to live in a country where the people are censored by its corrupt and borderline communist government.

  • Pingback: We’d feel dirty not posting about SOPA today.. | Earthgrid

  • Pingback: We’d feel dirty not posting about SOPA today.. : Digital Agency

  • Pingback: PatrickBay.ca -

  • Anonymous

    phlpn.es/829r8s

  • Anonymous

    tinyurl.ie/7fb

  • Pingback: Break Out the Encyclopedia Britannica: Wikipedia May Go Dark to Protest SOPA | Lose Your Fear

  • Mimi

    Please sign this petition to STOP S.O.P.A:
    http://www.change.org/petitions/congress-do-not-pass-the-sopa-bill

  • Harquebus

    I would just block all IP addresses originating in the U.S. They can have their internet and we’ll have ours.

  • Pingback: The Collage of Censorship

  • Pingback: Wikipedia Mulls Total Blackout to Oppose SOPA | Conspiring Pirates

  • BTGuard - BitTorrent Anonymously

NewsBits

Even more news...

  • The Pirate Bay Isn’t Down Completely, Just Having a Few Issues

    Twitter and Facebook, not to mention the TorrentFreak inbox, are currently alive with complaints that The...

  • Pirate Bay Founder Gottfrid Svartholm on Freedom of Speech

    Freedom of speech is a highly valued commodity, but should people be allowed to say whatever...

  • Blu-ray Anti-Piracy Tech Stops Discs and Promotes Purchases

    An anti-piracy system present in all official Blu-ray players since 2012 has received a fresh update...

  • Foxtel Breeds Pirates by Locking Up Game of Thrones

    One of the main reasons why people turn to piracy is the lack of legal alternatives....

  • UK Student Admits Breaching Sony Copyrights With Leak of PS3 SDK

    Last year an Internet user known as El Nomeo leaked version 3.70 of Sony’s Playstation3 SDK...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

PopularArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.