TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

Paris Hilton Sex Tape Sharers Wanted For Pirate Russian Roulette

The copyright owners of the Paris Hilton sex tape ‘One Night in Paris’ filed a lawsuit in January against 843 individuals they accused of sharing the now-infamous movie via BitTorrent. Their lawyer has now been told that he may engage in “immediate discovery” in order to find out the identities of the John Doe defendants. Are you worried that your name might be on the list? How about a $500 game of lawsuit Russian roulette? Do you feel lucky? Well, do ya, punk?

one night in parisThe Paris Hilton sex tape, One Night in Paris, became the subject of a new round of pay-up-or-else lawsuits this year. Owners XPays Inc. tracked hundreds of individuals sharing the ‘movie’ on BitTorrent and eventually sued 843 John Does at the District Court of Central California in January.

XPays told the Court that they had “spent a substantial amount of time, money and effort to produce, market and distribute” the tape, and that their profits from Paris Hilton’s horizontal endeavors are now on the wane due to infringements on file-sharing networks.

Fast forward to this month and XPays attorney Michael Fattorosi has just won an expedited discovery from U.S. District Court Judge S. James Otero.

“Plaintiff may engage in immediate discovery in this matter, including the issuing of subpoenas to cable operators and Internet Service Providers to produce any and all documents and/or information sufficient to identify the DOE defendants,” wrote Otero.

The ISPs involved in the case were given 7 days to notify subscribers that XPays were seeking to identify them. In turn, those subscribers were given 21 days from notification date in order to contest the subpoena.

However, according to documents sent by XPays to TorrentFreak last evening, the company is prepared to play a little file-sharing Russian roulette with people who are concerned they could be named in the lawsuit.

“XPays is pleased by the ruling of the Court that we can subpoena the names and addresses of those persons that illegally obtained our content. However, we are also very mindful of people’s privacy and would like to offer amnesty to anyone that would like to voluntarily come forward to resolve their case anonymously and with confidentiality. XPays is not pursuing this lawsuit with the hopes of embarrassing anyone or causing them any amount of shame. We merely want to protect our content,” the email reads.

“At this time anyone who has downloaded a free copy of the HotelHeiress.com Paris Hilton Sex Video aka One Night in Paris, can resolve this matter for $500. XPays believes this to be a very fair offer and one that is a substantial discount from any that will be offered in the future,” the email concludes.

It is worth pointing out that while XPays refers to people “illegally obtaining” content, and in the second paragraph people who have “downloaded a free copy”, the lawsuit they have filed is not related to these issues – it concerns the uploading or distribution of the ‘movie’ in question. Many more people will have downloaded the movie than uploaded it, so this ‘error’ by XPays conveniently helps to draw in more takers.

In addition to implying this is a downloading rather than an uploading amnesty, XPays has also put no geographic limitation on those who they are asking to participate in their scheme. This is interesting because XPays told the court that all of the 843 Does are residents of California. Perhaps, then, those outside California might be less inclined to settle. That brings the number of potential amnesty-seekers down a great deal.

That said, when compared to the cost of defending a lawsuit, $500 is a very small amount indeed and it is a very safe bet that XPays knows that. In fact, you can bet cold hard cash on their strategy being based on this risk-based calculation.

But like all those running these schemes, XPays is hoping that their nerve is stronger than those they target in this game of lawsuit roulette, that people won’t spin the barrel in the fear that the ‘click’ becomes a ‘bang’.

However, XPays are asking for $500 in order for people to opt out of game they may not even be involved in and they currently only have 843 bullets in their barrel aimed loosely at thousands of file-sharers. Furthermore, if the ISPs had 7 days to let the Does know they are being targeted, the 843 should be finding out who they are round about now. At this point, $500 might sound like a safe-ish option to them but why should it sound attractive to anyone else? More lawsuits to come? Only XPays knows that.

So, do you feel lucky?

Related Posts

Previous Post | Next Post

  • Anonymous

    I feel bad for Paris that her intercourse is being sold, and she ain’t earning anything…

    oh yeah, I think people who watch other people having sex are sad. They seem to not be able to have it themselves. that just sucks.

    • Lol12

      lol?

      Its always nice to rub one out prior to sex… why the fuck would I just “use my mind?”

    • DarknezzFallz

      LoL someone is lieing to themselfs not just everyone here on TF
      Not to mention that what they are doing wont go too far.. I would even be happy to pull the trigger first.

    • AM_Gov_Hate

      hey.. idiot… shes making money from it… her company is selling it!

      • http://twitter.com/zarathustra2k1 zar athustra

        PPOSTFU…

      • TheKhaos24

        That’s not her company bud…

  • ACS:Law v2

    This puts a whole new slant on “specualtive invoicing”.

    I will call it “speculative outvoicing”.

    People will fall for this scam like so many others.

    At the moment there are 61 seeders and 5 leechers for the film on the pirate bay, I guess she’s not as hot as she (or the producers) think.

    • The Unicorn’s Leprechan

      Thanks for the tip on TPB seed count….DLing now

  • http://twitter.com/ezee ezee

    I think it’s time a bunch of people wrote in with their unicorn and leprechaun advise ;)

    @500 it’s half priced!

  • Anonymous

    Not an other one….
    “”"
    Pay up or we will publicly shame you. It could be YOU…. Pay up or else !

    We will tell your wife… your kids… your employer…EVERYONE… you STOLE downloaded porn , of Paris HillFukUgyFace-ilton…. getting a’ , sexxy timed..
    “”"
    WTF… This is appauling… The trend seems , set to grow…

  • Thedude

    I’m confused,…A company that is using a celebrity, filmed during intercourse, in a movie they distribute,..without ever obtaining a signed release from her, are in turn suing those who unlawfully distribute that movie?

    • http://twitter.com/ezee ezee

      Copyright and American law – leave all sense of rationality, fairness and common sense at the door before entering please.

    • Momo

      The law says the copyrights are held by whoever held the camera, and this is what we get for putting a stupid idea like automatic copyrights into law.

      When was the last time you were on holiday and had a stranger take a picture of you? Well, the stranger has the copyrights on your picture – theoretically, you need his permission to publish it (e.g. put it on Flickr)!!

      • http://billy.wenge-murphy.com/ Billy Wenge-Murphy

        Lucky in that case, you also have your own “right of publicity” (basically, showing your face around or otherwise exploiting your identity or likeness without permission) – and you get MUCH greater protection as a non-celebrity! (“public figures” have less protection regarding use of their image or damage to their character)

        But yes, I agree that it’s stupid this gets protection at all. Lazily and unskillfully aiming a camera at unrehearsed fucking and sucking is not “creative” in any meaningful way that deserves protection. It should be denied copyright protection as being merely functional – you were merely recording happenings, not making art of them.

      • Anonymous

        Doesn’t portrait rights come in to play here? They will have had to pay her for that.

  • Anon

    Why bother pirating Paris Hilton in the first place?

    • anon anon anon

      Hands up (or like this comment) all those that think that the tape was leaked to bolster public opinion and (fortunately for the public) it failed

      • Phobophobia

        “no such thing as bad publicity” – really? i dont think so…

  • RIAAtarded

    can we sue the rights holder for the movie being crap and bill them for the lost hours of your life.

  • townie2

    i wouldn’t pay $500 to see Paris Hilton nude live, lol.

  • Gargamel

    Who would want to see that ugy skank naked in the 1st place when your on the internet and all the worlds porn at your fingertips?

    • Rebel

      Because i’m a rebel.

  • http://disqus.com/ Rob8urcakes

    The District Judge – Y’all are charged with the unlawful distribution of this item of sheer smut that was recorded without permission of the main protagonists and therefore unlawfully obtained by the Plaintiff. How do you plead?

    The Defendant – Not guilty, Your Honor!
    The Prosecution – Our evidence obtained under subpeona from an ISP clearly shows that on the date & time in question your internet account was used, beyond all reasonable doubt whatsoever, to share this digital file with persons unknown, somewhere on planet Earth with beings just as capable as you. Do you deny this evil and heinous crime?

    The Defendant – Yes, I of course do. That’s what “not guilty” means you ignorant fuckwit (Aside – pardon me Your Honor, but is he taking the piss now?)

    Prosecution – I enter into the official record these documents proving your guilt. And WHAT do you have to say about THAT?
    Defendant – Well, I enter into the public record the fact that I’m 12 year old, 100% gay, haven’t ever had an erection (let alone sex), and am allergic to Viagra as well as women.
    …. Daddy, can I get a cuddle please?

    • Eloh

      ROFL!!! XD

  • trustnoone

    Thats bull shit!!! its not like the xpay people can copy right it can they? since paris hilton made the tape. The only person that can is paris hilton? otherwise wouldn’t that mean I can hit up something made freely for example ubuntu (or something that doesn’t have any copyright), and then legally make people pay for it?!!

  • PleaseRemoveDisqus

    Her sex tape isn’t even all that good. It’s cringe-making, not hot:
    Man: “She likes the cock”
    Paris: “No, you like it”.

    It’s 10 minutes of shite. Not worth downloading for free. Actually, I’d have to be GIVEN money to download it for free. FFS…

    • Lothor The Evil

      If you think it’s crap and have not downloaded it, does that mean you actually payed for it? How can you say something is crap if you indicate you have never seen it? I downloaded it once. Thought it was boring crap.

  • Peter

    It’s the PIMP trying to collect off his well used HOE.

  • Dr_Faustus
    • Anonymous

      Someone’s medical records should not be on public display.

      • Herpes

        Her nasty infected poon shouldn’t be on display either, but that sure hasn’t stopped her from flashing it to the public on more occasions than anyone cares to remember. I wonder – can her DVD give you VD? Man, I sure hope those 843 John Does didn’t download a virus!

      • Herpes

        Her nasty infected poon shouldn’t be on display either, but that sure hasn’t stopped her from flashing it to the public on more occasions than anyone cares to remember. I wonder – can her DVD give you VD? Man, I sure hope those 843 John Does didn’t download a virus!

    • Me

      Lots of people have herpes. It doesn’t mean they are dirty, sleep around or anything else.

      • Herpes

        It does in her case. And she still owes me $500.00! Cheap bimbo…

      • Herpes

        It does in her case. And she still owes me $500.00! Cheap bimbo…

    • Herpes

      I want $500.00 from her for infecting herself without my consent.

      I haz copyrightz.

  • Anonymous

    LOL at the thief trying to sue people for robbing him of what he stole.

  • markie

    Who cares about what Paris Hilton does? She has made other nude clips that has made there rounds online.

    One Night In Paris. Get over it. The internet is for porn hasn’t anybody worked that out yet.

  • Momo

    No editorial from Rick Falkvinge this week?

    I has a sad :(

  • SteRipper

    Damn – I was gonna get the movie.

  • Anonymous

    “At this time anyone who has downloaded a free copy of the HotelHeiress.com Paris Hilton Sex Video aka One Night in Paris, can resolve this matter for $500. XPays believes this to be a very fair offer and one that is a substantial discount from any that will be offered in the future,” the email concludes.”

    For $500 I hope they throw in a free screw with Paris Hilton. Maybe the only reason many would consider paying it. Still that girl sure is a skinny one, each to their own, and where fame and fortune are not all to life.

    I can also see why she made a sequel when the first so-called “stolen” one of her getting some doggie could have been better. You are more left remembering her glowing eyes on night shot mode.

    And damn that woman when I am sure more people have seen her having sexual intercourse than any other woman on this planet. Make your daddy proud hon. And what a great role model for young girls then to be famous due to taking some meat. At least she has a good business mind behind her bimbo act.

    The only good thing about Paris Hilton’s sex videos is that they have taught many of those going through puberty where to stick it. They are also soft porn enough to be quite harmless.

  • LLOLsucks

    If my dog was humping her, I’d pull him off her.. Can’t believe people would want to download *THAT*

    • Anonymous

      I would video tape that. See, that is why you don’t make more money that you do.

  • InterWebz

    Remember folks if you are a company/coporation feel free to blackmail, exploit, and con the public. Its only criminal if you do so and don’t pay taxes.

  • Guest

    So what happens if some of the accused persons are found to be juveniles? The film makers are demanding payment for a pornographic video from a child? Sounds like they could be in some trouble for that.

    • Rebel

      They’d bill/sue/charge the parents. As a minor, I keep that in mind when DL’ing shit.

      I haven’t downloaded this though, as I’m definitely not interested in Paris. ;)

  • Fugasmic

    Just as well my wife loves watching porn as well, and I can tell you she wasn’t too impressed with Paris’s blowjob abilities.

  • noko

    I’d pay $500 to see Paris Hilton play Russian Roulette.

    I detest that woman!

  • Anonymous

    So eeh, all these people have a personal (non dynamic) IP address (assigned to each person in the household) that no one else can use? So we can sue an individual, not a household of random people living together.

    Including for example, the person renting a room upstairs, all people living in the same dorm, people in special homes for special people, friends, neighbors, people in a car outside your home, schools, workplace ect and all people in there. Will they be suing grandmothers and pastors again like in the UK?

    On top of that; is something preventing me from spoofing their IP right now (really just typing in the IP i want)? Using the exact same IP at the same time they are. Give me the judge’s IP address than. If it is a fixed address he will have to agree that he is guilty if i download paris porn with his IP.

    And their wifi can not be used by any 12 year old starting backtrack and following the exact instructions in a youtube video? Really? I was not aware of this amazing new technological breakthrough… No seriously, i laugh, but i cry. IP addresses are not proof of anything.

    It is like having speeding camera’s in a world where licence plates are white-boards written on with a magic marker. And the law should protect people that do not understand that others can use their number by simply writing it on the back of their car. Would you be ok with your grandma receiving my tickets because i use her plates?

  • Whoehahaha

    I don’t get it,…. everyone here talks about protection, but euh dudes…….. they did not use protection as far as I could see :D

  • Whatever

    @”We merely want to protect our content”
    How do they achieve this with asking $500 for down/uploading (NOT) their content.
    Its like protecting the lives of people who died in a car accident by paying out the insurance money. If they really wanted to protect it they should anounced that they will be monitoring p2p for “illegal” copies before starting to sell it.

    @Paris worth/not worth watching.
    I think it is just human curiosity and has much more todo with watching people in accidents and natural disasters than watching porn. Its also the reason that there are likely much more people that download it than buy it (and if its really just 10 minutes, can’t imagine anyone wanting to pay for that while they can get a full movie).

  • Sarip

    This is the kind of movie you’ll regret downloading, it’s a total waste of bandwidth and time. Unless you are looking for proof that Paris isn’t even any good at sucking c*ck.

  • J.

    OK, could someone explain the difference between a porn movie & a sex tape….

    It was my understanding that a sex tape was just 2 (or more – or 1 I suppose) individuals who happened to decide to film themselves getting it on for whatever reason….

    So how is it that XPays “spent a substantial amount of time, money and effort to produce, market and distribute”

    Shouldn’t it just be Paris & whomever she was spending ‘quality time’ with? If there was a whole team there, doesn’t that make it porn?

  • Ad

    Hell….being sued for sharing this would be more humiliating than sharing a Uwe Boll film! Who *wouldn’t* pay to prevent it from coming to light? ;-)

  • Pingback: Paris Hilton porn owner to pirates: pay up or face litigation | MyCE – My Consumer Electronics

  • Sociacioux

    I would rather poke my eyes with a hot needle than watch that sh!t.

  • BTGuard - BitTorrent Anonymously

NewsBits

Even more news...

  • The Pirate Bay Isn’t Down Completely, Just Having a Few Issues

    Twitter and Facebook, not to mention the TorrentFreak inbox, are currently alive with complaints that The...

  • Pirate Bay Founder Gottfrid Svartholm on Freedom of Speech

    Freedom of speech is a highly valued commodity, but should people be allowed to say whatever...

  • Blu-ray Anti-Piracy Tech Stops Discs and Promotes Purchases

    An anti-piracy system present in all official Blu-ray players since 2012 has received a fresh update...

  • Foxtel Breeds Pirates by Locking Up Game of Thrones

    One of the main reasons why people turn to piracy is the lack of legal alternatives....

  • UK Student Admits Breaching Sony Copyrights With Leak of PS3 SDK

    Last year an Internet user known as El Nomeo leaked version 3.70 of Sony’s Playstation3 SDK...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

PopularArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.