TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

Top Artists Line Up for Kim Dotcom’s Megabox

Kim Dotcom is currently involved in a high-profile criminal prosecution in the U.S., but that isn’t stopping him from preparing the launch of a revolutionary new music service. With Megabox, Dotcom aims to make piracy an issue of the past by introducing free music for all. Dotcom told TorrentFreak that some of the world’s top artists have already signed up for the launch, and more are expected to follow.

Megabox first appeared in the news late last year, following the release of the “Mega Song” promo.

The song featured top artists including P Diddy, Will.i.am, Alicia Keys, Snoop Dogg and Kanye West, endorsing the now-defunct Megaupload. At the time, Megaupload founder Kim Dotcom explained that he had plans to put the “dinosaur record labels” out of business with the release of Megabox.

A month later, however, the Megabox domain was seized as part of the criminal case against Dotcom and other members of the so-called “Mega Conspiracy”. While many thought this was the end of the ambitious plans, Megaupload’s founder recently announced that Megabox is not dead yet.

In fact, the events of the past half year make Dotcom more motivated than ever before.

“I am totally excited about changing the music industry forever and giving the power to the artists,” Dotcom told TorrentFreak today. And he has reason to be excited.

Despite the legal woes, Megabox can still count on the support of many of the world’s top musicians. According to Dotcom, several of them have agreed to try the “free music” model.

“Some of the world’s top artists have lined up to launch with us and I want to make sure that they have the launch that they deserve. And of course the same is true for all the hidden talent out there, the artists who want to use Megabox as a launch pad,” Dotcom says.


Megabox

megabox

The basic idea behind Megabox is simple. Give the public access to free music, and cut out the big labels so artists get properly compensated from the revenue being generated.

This revenue comes from the Megakey application that users have to install. Megakey works like an ad blocker, but instead of blocking ads it replaces a small percentage with Mega’s own ads. Those who prefer not to install the app have the option to buy the music instead.

“Music will be free for users who install the Megakey App. Anyone who does not like the App can just purchase the music,” Dotcom explains.

If successful, Megabox will be bad news for the major record labels, who currently enjoy a large cut of music sales. Depending on the revenue that’s generated, for artists Megabox may be an improvement as they get to keep nearly all of the money that comes in.

“These new solutions will allow content creators to keep 90% of all earnings and generate significant income from the untapped market of free downloads,” Dotcom says.

“I created an innovation that could solve the piracy problem,” he adds

That last part is important. Megaupload’s founder believes that this “free music” business model has the potential to decrease music piracy. It won’t be the solution preferred by the major labels, but artists should be encouraged by the offering.

In the weeks to come Kim Dotcom and his colleagues are hoping to get Megabox ready for a public release once there’s more certainty concerning the ongoing extradition attempt. Definitely something to keep an eye on.

Related Posts

Previous Post | Next Post

  • who?

    Go baby go!

    • http://nipp.me/089 Glenda N. Paez

      I believe artists will be better compensated, and people would not steal music anymore! http://FreeLancerGetWork7.notlong.com

    • http://ufil.ms/bK6Pk Katie M. Nelson

      We’re pirates. We like facts. Until you have some, please leave. http://FoxGetPositionWork.blogspot.com

    • Sinistre

      Haha! The old music industry is fucked for good this time!

      They are not needed anymore if they were either.

      It is time for these corporate parasites to check with EDD! Hopefully they will all end up in the street or dead.

      • mehh

        I wouldnt say that.
        All the RIAA has to do it make better deals for the artists.

  • Anon

    MegaBox = 2012 innovative solution 

    Major Labels = What so innovative from them except they get rid of competitors by suing them?

    • FrostyC

      The RIAA knows this is their death certificate. That is why they broke the law to try to stop them in vain. Everyone say it with me; Artists, listeners, composers & performers alike: “FREE AT LAST… FINALLY WE ARE FREE AT LAST!”

      Innovation>Litigation

  • thedude321

    Yes, with this model, similar to the one that google uses, I believe artists will be better compensated, and people would not steal music anymore! :P

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Ender-Wiggin/100000885624281 Ender Wiggin

      might not be so far off, i mean…i’ve got a few thousand tracks, but 9 times in ten i just use pandora or spotify, rather than makiing playlists, or moving stuff from device to device…it’s just faster.   Sometimes my music collection feels like a bag of baseball cards i’ve been lugging around since i was a kid, dont really need them, almost never look at them, but can’t bear to get rid of them.

    • Guest

       A question arises; Why wouldn’t I just use an ad-blocker on the Mega ads? I’m sure someone will make a program to do that, so why should I be more motivated to watch the Mega ads then I am to watch any other ads?

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Gear-Mentation/100003097514663 Gear Mentation

         You won’t be, but advertisers still pay for adverts… we who block the adverts are just wicked that way.

        • Guest

          The image would have to be verified as downloaded I’m guessing until you can play a track. The only way to block it would be to have a separate program that covers the screen area where they are. Pointless really. Why not embrace it and just ignore the ads or do you not have the will power.

        • Nuke

          We are not wicked, we just don’t want shit in our face. Flashing seizure inducing ads and those huge noisy bandwidth wasting flash ads really piss me off. if they can avoid showing that crap, adverts should be quite acceptable on the platform. if you don’t like it, you should just be able to simply ignore it and listen to some sweet sweet music.

        • Guest

          Gear Mentation:

          No, the advertisers don’t pay. Haven’t you ever seen small sites asking you not to use adblock because they don’t get paid? The advertisers don’t pay when the ad is not seen.

          Nuke:

          I’m not sure about you, but I don’t want any ads, regardless of their type.

        • Guest

           @ac772b48d6728242138b1df18c9716e5:disqus You’re a fucking cunt

        • Lord of the Files

          Ads can certainly be annoying, especially those flash based ones. There is a subtle difference between completely random ads on websites I visit and those on Megabox though. One set is unsolicited, the other isn’t. I’m aware of the cost behind using the Megakey application and am willing to accept it as the price I pay for free music. Emphasis on FREE. It’s a very small price to pay and I can always ignore them. If you’re not willing to accept ads, there is still an alternative for you, one that might not even be so bad if the price is right. Many here have said they’re willing to pay so long as the price is reasonable (I’m thinking of AllOfMp3, not Apple). I have admitted this a few times myself simply because it would mean not having to worry about some thugs knocking on my door at 2 in the morning with a search warrant lol. On rare occasions there may actually be some interesting ads worth checking out too, especially if you can customize what kind of ads you’d like to see. The way I see things? It’s better to try this idea and fail than to not try anything at all. If there is even the remotest chance both artists and fans can both come out on top, we should take it, yes? The middle men won’t like it for sure, but who cares about them? They don’t innovate, they just hate.

        • Laura

           In reply to guest
          Its a scam, they get paid either way, I read it soon after ppl were saying “don’t block our ads, there was a counter article showing how they get paid either way with examples. I can’t find it atm, probably buried by crafty seo. Anyways, I did come across this however http://www.techdirt.com/articles/2010030/1649198451.shtml
          Don’t blame your community, ad blocking is not killing any sites…

        • Dom13021973

          You definitely need to understand that nothing is free. It’s just the most fair way to allow you to listen to music without the need to pay for it. I don’t mind advertising as long as I don’t have to pay to listen to the tunes I like.

      • Devineslayer2692

        I think that you may have missed the point. If you just block the adds, you will have to pay for the music. If you pay to block regular adds, the music is free. In this way, the artists will make money either way.

      • Der

         Doesn’t the new Adblock Plus versions have the ability to allow non-intrusive text-based ads?

    • http://profiles.google.com/zerianis10 Christopher Kidwell

      No one is ‘stealing music’. As I keep on pointing out, 99% of people today have cable TV or satellite TV subscriptions, which COME WITH MUSIC CHANNELS!

      There is no ‘stealing’ going on here.

      • Guest

        Bullshit. You’re simply wrong. As of 2006, only around 58% of Americans had basic cable services (source; wikipedia). Note that basic cable does NOT have to contain music stations, and very often does not. As for satellite TV, about 20 million subscribed to Direct TV in 2010, and the numbers have been steadily decreasing because of the poor economy. This leads me to conclude that your claim of 99% is simply wrong. That is also not taking into account piracy from Europe and Asia, where TV is not nearly as prevalent. The U.S. isn’t the only country on Earth you know.

        Also, since you’ve in the past claimed that the vast majority of all piracy is from previously-paid services, not just music piracy, I also have to point out that your television argument fails when considering movies and games, which do not have this type of service in existence.

        If you want to keep to your claim, present evidence. I’ll be honest here; I think you’re just making shit up because it justifies your cause. Just accept it. We pirate stuff we haven’t paid for. Freaking deal with it and stop making stuff up. You’re like the Mafiaa, lying to support your case.

        We’re pirates. We like facts. Until you have some, please leave.

        • Tomato Chain

           Son of a bitch… Sharing is not stealing.. as simple as that.. Get out of here, You MAFIAA scum!!!

        • Guest

          So, in other words, because piracy is allegedly taking place overseas the US suddenly has international jurisdiction?

          Can you imagine what would happen if countries like China and Saudi Arabia could claim the same powers? Your point is ridiculous, and you should be ashamed of yourself.

        • Anon

          notice the shell game played with the numbers:
          only 58% had basic cable service as of 2006. a full 6 years ago.
          also this does not include satellite customers who have music services tied to their service.
          while i will agree games do not have these issues, movies on the other hand clearly do have these issues. may i present game of thrones as proof that cable line movies and and do get pirated. 

          if you want people to take you seriously about your posts, stop playing shell games with ancient numbers that are no longer meaningful and take into account ALL the information available not just that which suites you.

        • Guest

          Tomato Chain: I didn’t say any of that. Read what I wrote again, and it may become aware to you that I am myself a pirate. Just because I’m a pirate doesn’t mean I can’t call out Kidwell’s lies. There are good reasons to be a pirate, but lies are not part of them, and Kidwell is lying.

          Guest: I did not claim that anywhere. Read it again. Kidwell made a claim about ALL piracy (not this time, but he has in the past, as you can see in his comment history). He didn’t make a claim about U.S. piracy, he made a claim about all piracy, so I had to present numbers to prove him wrong. I did not claim that other nations should follow U.S. law on piracy, but you do have to acknowledge that piracy does happen in other countries. Or do you deny this simple fact?

          Read it again and you’ll see that I did not write what you think I did.

          Anon: I was able to find out that cable ownership has decreased in the past two years, not increased, and satellite held steady until at least 2009. I have no reason to believe there has been a sudden jump that would raise the percentage to anywhere the 99% Kidwell claims. Do you have a reason to believe this? If so, present data and prove it.

          If you have numbers that you think are more relevant, present them. I can’t help but notice that you didn’t present any contradictory evidence, you just claimed that mine must be wrong. If you do some research, you may find out that data does not support your view. You may also find that it does support your view. Until you find contradictory data to support your claim, I’m going to stick with mine.

          Also, Game of Thrones is a TV show, not a movie, and it’s a TV show that is very expensive to acquire normally. It is not the example of a norm for TV shows, and it does not represent movies at all.

        • Ahzirr Durrarriss

          Kidwell made a poor choice in wording his comment. Replace the “99%” with the words “the majority” and it become completely accurate, a claim even supported by the somewhat outdated numbers Guest posted. I do believe this is what Kidwell actually meant and that he wasn’t trying to make an actual claim of 99% specifically. The truth is that it’s a relatively common way of saying something to the effect of “most people” and “the majority of folks”, insofar as English is concerned.

          I subscribe to cable for whatever that fact is worth. I get all of the movie channels, specialty channels like HBO, and more music channels than there are network based ones. In addition to the music service that is included which has a ton of different genres and eras, they also provide every radio station within a 400 kilometer radius. It’s hard to feel guilty about downloading any entertainment, especially when the content I download tends to show up on my cable service in no time at all, even the latest movies which show up within three to four months after being released on DVD/BR. The tuner provided as part of my package has the ability to record two HD channels while watching a third and it’s not at all illegal to record stuff for private personal use. Even so, I still prefer bittorrent for television shows. It’s more convenient and requires less effort.

          I may technically be a pirate, but I don’t care because I know they’re getting their cut one way or another. If I didn’t have internet access, I’d just wait until it aired on cable and record it then. I just refuse to pay for anything more than once. If things ever get bad enough due to the heavy handed actions of the copyright industry (like the passing of extremely draconian laws, which so far they’ve failed at here), I will have no qualms about canceling my cable service until things improve. Knowing they’ll happily take the money I give them and use it to prosecute me is enough to make my skin crawl. I do have a concience and want to see artists get paid, but not when the price is freedom and liberty. I’d rather forgo all forms of copyrighted entertainment than pay that particular price.

        • Guest

           No, it still doesn’t become accurate. Guest’s numbers showed basic
          cable packages, which do not necessarily have music channels, so we can
          MAYBE say that it’s true for music piracy, but only if we leave out
          every country except the U.S. when making our judgement. When movies,
          games, and other forms of media are added into the equation, we have to
          conclude that most piracy does not occur in the situations Kidwell
          describes.

          Something to note from your anecdote (oh, and if you want anecdotes, I
          never pirate anything I have already paid for, and I don’t own any type
          of cable because I have piracy). If you are pirating a movie long
          before it is available for the service you paid for, then we can’t
          consider your piracy to be something to be something you have “already
          paid for” because it was not yet available on your service. If pirated
          post DVD-release date, then it would be available on your service, and
          we could count this as an example of already paid for piracy. Otherwise,
          we are removing the factor of time from our judgments, which can not be
          done when time of release is a reason for the piracy.

          Secondly, I did not claim you should feel guilty for piracy. I am a
          pirate myself. That does not mean I will tolerate Kidwell’s lies about
          pirates. As stated above, we are pirates, and we like facts. Considering
          that Kidwell’s claims do not seem to constitute facts even considering
          the generous leeway you give him (and trust me, Kidwell actually thinks
          over 90% of piracy is already paid for. Read his comment history), I
          have nothing against calling him on his bullshit. If piracy is going to
          be taken seriously, it will not be on the backs of obvious lies and
          falsehoods.

      • Guest

         No, it still doesn’t become accurate. Guest’s numbers showed basic cable packages, which do not necessarily have music channels, so we can MAYBE say that it’s true for music piracy, but only if we leave out every country except the U.S. when making our judgement. When movies, games, and other forms of media are added into the equation, we have to conclude that most piracy does not occur in the situations Kidwell describes.

        Something to note from your anecdote (oh, and if you want anecdotes, I never pirate anything I have already paid for, and I don’t own any type of cable because I have piracy). If you are pirating a movie long before it is available for the service you paid for, then we can’t consider your piracy to be something to be something you have “already paid for” because it was not yet available on your service. If pirated post DVD-release date, then it would be available on your service, and we could count this as an example of already paid for piracy. Otherwise, we are removing the factor of time from our judgments, which can not be done when time of release is a reason for the piracy.

        Secondly, I did not claim you should feel guilty for piracy. I am a pirate myself. That does not mean I will tolerate Kidwell’s lies about pirates. As stated above, we are pirates, and we like facts. Considering that Kidwell’s claims do not seem to constitute facts even considering the generous leeway you give him (and trust me, Kidwell actually thinks over 90% of piracy is already paid for. Read his comment history), I have nothing against calling him on his bullshit. If piracy is going to be taken seriously, it will not be on the backs of obvious lies and falsehoods.

        • Guest

          This was to Ahzirr down below. My bad.

  • Pingback: Anonymous

  • Pzf

    Damn, I can’t believe how much I want this to be successful, even if only to crush those greedy corporate bastards. 

    • Guest

      Well Kim is no less greedy that those greedy corporate bastards you are talking about. Already a multi-millionaire and soon to be a billionaire if this takes off. So lets not put this fat potato on some kind of pedestal as he is no Robin Hood.

      • Arbiter

         1/10 for making me reply.
        Troll harder next time, kid.

      • Guest

         The difference is. He innovates.

        Which would you prefer? A wealthy guy that doesn’t learn new tricks. Or an innovator.

      • Anyone

        he provides a great service people gladly pay for
        so he deserves the money he gets, that’s how capitalism works

        he is not exploiting or sueing or censoring or generally being an asshole to other people like the MAFIAA is

      • Guest

        Hahahahaha, oh wow, the industry trolls are scared shitless of Megabox

        Seeing as how Kim Dotcom will be giving 90% of the profits to the artists while the MAFIAA bastards give less than 10% of the profits to the artists, that makes him way fucking less greedy. The “fat potato” deserves to be put on a pedestal. 

        Oh no, he might become a billionaire by doing something positive for the world. Boo hoo.

      • Neil.

         I hope he does become a billionaire, that will be 10 billion less money to the greedy assholes you shill for and 9 billion in the hands of musicians.

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Gear-Mentation/100003097514663 Gear Mentation

         His ass is fat because he innovates.  He isn’t just sitting back raking in profits from copyright or controlling innovators for his own gain like the MAFIAA.

      • Sick

        He’s no Robin Hood, but he isn’t Satan either, the RIAA is.

      • Anonymous

        He can have his money, all I want is some good music.

  • DieScumDie

    More power to the guy i say, those bastards deserve everything they get, and i hope they get fucked good and proper.

    • X2

       x2

  • BlackPropeller

    Replacing other ads with mega’s ads?

    Would that mean that he’d be hurting small to medium webmasters??

    • Violated0

      I would have liked to have seen other sites have a music player API with integrated advertising. Then those sites can offer visitors free music while Mega gets the advertising revenue.

      • BlackPropeller

        That would be so awesome! It’s actually a brilliant idea! monetize sharing somehow…wow!

      • Guest

        I wonder how long this advertising model would work. As more and more webmasters exploit this model, the harder it would get to squeeze the lemon. Afterall, everybody hates ads and more and more people are using adblock. Its been ages since I have seen an ads on the Internet since everything gets blocked.

    • dwpbike

      what does a “small to medium webmaster” look like?

      • BlackPropeller

        webmasters or bloggers who have anywhere from 1 to a couple thousand visitors.

        or even youtubers that monetize their videos.

        It’s hard to make everyone happy, so by helping artists, megabox might hurt other webmasters with the MegaKey app.

        • Gae

          Most of the youtube ads are built into the video player, they are unlikely to be affected.

          As for the rest, assuming that it does not replace every ad on a page and on every single page a person visits, then the impact will be minimal. Some will still be affected but times change and if you can’t move with the change then unfortunately you are out of luck.

        • BlackPropeller

          @bf75dd6a9f901c078bff0595908f3ea2:disqus ,  in-video ads aren’t turned on by default. The ad blocks to the left of videos are still more popular and are always turned on.
          Webmasters can bust out the same line the labels and holywood are using…. we’re losing earnings that we could have had.

          http://img37.imageshack.us/img37/4599/ytads.png 

        • PK

          Youtube videos has ads too? Since when did that happen? Haven’t come across any videos yet with ads.

        • Guest

          You have every right to block ads and to edit a webpage. It is put into the public realm and once you’ve connected and downloaded the page it’s up to you what you do with it. A webmaster can not force you do anything for example see an ad. They can try, but you can also tryh to avoid them.

      • OccamsKatana

         Like a big one, but smaller.

      • Hephaestus

        Like a leprechaun, or Mini me.

      • ScrewEwe2

        A small to medium webmaster is usually between 5 feet & 5 feet 5 inches in stature.

        An example of a large webmaster is attached.

        • PasserBy

          hahhaha. good one.

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/JHLPCHVTRCP7BZFMYXXEHT67Y4 Amy

    what Peter replied I didnt even know that anybody can earn $8628 in 4 weeks on the internet. have you seen this website  (Click on menu Home more information)   http://goo.gl/4c9lU  

  • Pascal Welsch

    so excited!

  • Danny

    The only issue is the likes of TorrentFreak will no longer get an ad revenue stream thanks to the mega key adware.

    As a rule I don’t install adware and rely on adblock for my sanity on the web. I disable adblock on sites that deserve income from my screen space, like TorrentFreak and several other sites I regularly visit.

    • Neil.

       You did read the part about only a small percentage of adds being replaced?

  • http://cyberkiller.pip.verisignlabs.com/ Cyber Killer

    I wonder if there’s going to be a GNU/Linux version.

    • Psycho

       It is most probably a browser add-on so i guess it wont matter what OS you are using, im only speculating but that would be way to do it

  • DarKPenguiN

    I really dont care about Music as I am more an Ebook/Audiobook guy- BUT, what an excellent idea. I would actually use a service like this I think.

  • Mark

    I am really looking forward to this and hope it takes off, fed up with the bigger labels ripping of people.

  • Anonymous

    i believe this is the main reason why Megaupload was targeted for closure by the RIAA etc. imagine how those dinosaurs felt when they learned of the service. the panic that it caused would have been a pleasure to see! from 90% of income from sales dropping to nothing must have given the execs a near heart attack! the most sad parts of this whole incident are that the US government were used to facilitate the raid on Dotcom’s business and shut the website(s) down under false pretenses using false evidence. what Dotcom is proposing could have been done by the labels anyway, had they not been so greedy and used the formula of, sign artists, produce music, pay artists, cater for customers wants, charge sensible prices. now, once the service is up and running, Dotcom is going to be earning money along with the artists, who are going to be earning a lot more than they did previously under the labels greed ridden system, who will be getting nada!

    • Hephaestus

      I am wondering if he is going to work streaming, sat radio, and music for movie revenues into the mix, the would be total destruction for the big record labels. Wiping out the entirety of their future revenue stream. 

  • Interested

    Very nice. If MB works as promised, I sure will start using it instead of TPB.

    • Guest

       I’m pretty sure that TPB has already made deals.  I see no reason why there won’t be an affiliate program.

  • http://twitter.com/Anime4PSP Anime 4 PSP

    Death to outdated record industry. Long live, MegaBox!
    Also want MegaClick to start too.

    • Captain Buzzoverinthehead DFC

      Targeting the moribund music industry…

      Setting phasers to ‘annihilate’…

      Fire!

      It’s the kindest thing to do – put it out of our misery.

  • Guest

    I can hear the noise of the cogs in the dinosaur brains clanking away of the MPAA and RIAA as they now try and come up with yet more faked charges of racketeering, defrauding and profiteering from piracy etc. to be filed against Megabox. They will no doubt get the Megabox website seized with the reason that a criminal (there word) should not be allowed to run a business.

    I truly hope that Megabox benefits the artists in more ways than the MPAA and RIAA ever does and that the MPAA and RIAA become obsolete or very much crippled.

  • Violated0

    Has the US Government really seized Mega”s domains?

    I have checked MegaUpload.com and MegaPorn.com and both seem very much in Mega’s control and listed to their HK address. MegaBox.com is different when it applies a Moniker Privacy Services filter which is not something I would ever expect to see on a US seized domain.

    What is most beautiful about the MegaBox return and that the RIAA and DoJ can do completely nothing to stop this. Mega being attacked due to the MegaBox announcement is a popular “attacking out rival” theory. So if any RIAA member or the DoJ says but one word of criticism about MegaBox then this would be evidence that would be used in Court if this case gets that far.

    So it seems Kim Dotcom is playing a very carefully planned political move and the huge publicity generated is an awesome bonus. Not to forget that very many artists hate the unethical practices of the RIAA and would take a stand against them.

  • YARIGHT

    FUCK this place and its gay tampoon ads

    • Guest

      And you know where you can shove it lol

  • LOLsucks

    Megalomanic idea .. it’s gonna fail.

    • Guest

      Megabox will be Mega awesome and a Mega success.

  • Anonymous

    Piracy will always be an issue as long as idiot singers keep selling their souls to the devil MAFIAA industry.

    It means that the MAFIAA can sue the singers too if they upload their songs to the web without the MAFIAA’s blessing.

    Solution: STAY INDIE!

    • Guest

      As soon as the artists contract expires that they have with them than I can’t see how they can be sued if there is no contract.

  • ElseAndrew

    Killing someone’s revenue stream so they can generate a revenue stream? How is this any better… 

    • Neil.

       It’s called competition, you need to look it up.

      • ElseAndrew

         It’s still bullshit – you’re ranting about people stealing money from artists… But now the artists are going to be stealing from us, like I said it’s no different.

        • Guest

          It’s still better

          #)1 There’s no longer a middleman taking a huge cut

          #)2 They deserve it more due to them putting the actual work in, unlike the MAFIAA industry which gets a free ride and is just a tapeworm like parasite on the incomes of the singers, hence why a lot of them go touring ‘cos the MAFIAA don’t get much if anything from those.

        • teenygozer

           You wrote “you’re ranting about people stealing money from artists… But now the artists are going to be stealing from us” — is that a typo?  Because I’m genuinely confused about how this new set-up makes it so that artists can steal from us.

        • Neil.

           The only way that could happen is if the ‘us’ you refer to are MAFIAA execs.
          In that case you deserve to be cleaned out.

  • Anonymous

    Nice idea, but there’s no way I’m installing adware.

    It all sounds a bit restrictive and tied-in – kind of like iTunes.

    • Jigga-Munt

      Or kind of like having to install torrent software to download torrents. How is it much different?

      • William

        It is different because torrent files do not have vendor lock-in.  Torrents can be downloaded with clients made by several vendors.  There is BitTorrent/µTorrent, Transmission, Shareaza, FrostWire, Vuze, Opera, etc.  There are even embedded BitTorrent clients, such as in the Blizzard Downloader for World of Warcraft, or the Wubi installer for Ubuntu.  The torrent file format is an open standard, available at 
        http://www.bittorrent.org/

        • PasserBy

           True, but if there was no Vendor lock-in then nobody would have to pay for music, instead someone would make plugins for music players like winamp to use the megabox service and stream free music. generating no revenue.
          seriously if the ads bother someone im sure they can port block the port that the app is recieving ads on or filter access to the domain the ads are coming from, same thing everyones already doing with there firewalls, browser addons, and host file.

        • John Spartan

          This guy is a clear example of someone who gives file-sharers a bad name.

        • Guest

          @dc48d3cb04f996b5f01857626f71bf57:disqus Who are you referring to? William? or PasserBy?

    • Logos

       Yes, but it comes without the Apple logo. That’s worth something.

      • Guest

        To dipshits?

    • Anonymouse

       It’s not actually adware you don’t get any more adds it just replaces adds with its own so instead of google tracking you with it’s adds they will be replaced with megabox adds.

  • Guest

    Block other peoples ads, and replace them with your own….?

    wow… thats just… wow. Thats f-ing genius.

    Has anyone else tried this already?

    • Guest

      How would you feel if your website, run by ads that you need to live, starts receiving nothing because people visiting it use megakey ;)

      • Asd

         Kinda like how ppl use adblock plus right now?

        If you didn’t ask for ads, you shouldnt receive ads. It’s by the good grace of the public that we allow people to make money from our eyes. There will always ALWAYS be software to gimp advertising on the net.

        • Guest

           Well, here’s a question then; am I really asking for the Megabox ads? I just want the free music. I don’t really want their ads anymore than I want corporate ads.

          I think I’ll just block them. Someone will release a program allowing us to block the Megabox ads. Then I’ll join Megabox.

  • http://techfleece.com/ Richard Gailey

    “If you build it, they will come”

    Let’s hope that Kim’s future plans work out. Looking forward to seeing this develop.

  • Dnla

    If MAFIAA/Hollywood are so evil, do so many wicked schemes to crush all these innovations, say that such services profit a lot “from piracy” the question is: why they don’t do it themselves, if they care so much about their profits? Do you guys here really think they’re that stupid? No, they know full well what they’re doing. It’s not about being concerned over piracy, it’s not about the money and profits they allegedly “don’t get”. The only thing they want is stay in control of the industry (and they’ll keep their outdated business scheme just to make it easier to control the customers) and dictate to the public what they “need” to get, just what happens in repressive dictatorial regimes, where if you challenge the status quo, you’re fu****. “You’re only allowed to get/do/say what WE want!” If we have freedom of speech, why can’t we say what we want (say, upload a documentary about jews without idiotical backlash about “Hate Speech”, “anti-semitism” and the takedown of the video, without any actual argument to counter that affirmation? What if I try to offer a different point of view of WW2, without it necessarily portraying the Allies as the perfect good guys and the Axis as the text-book example of bad guys (admittedly, the Axis powers did a lot of horrible things, but the Allies also did. I bet many of you never heard of that)? Think about it.)?

    Who do you think runs Hollywood? Why can’t I do the things above without fear of undue punishment?

    • Guest

       ”upload a documentary about jews without idiotical backlash about “Hate Speech”, “anti-semitism” and the takedown of the video,”

      You do have the right to upload the videos. You do not have the right to be shielded from criticism based on what you upload. If you post something that appears bigoted and hateful, you’re

      Oh, and most of those videos aren’t taken down. You can go on youtube or any other video service and see many examples of hateful rhetoric demonizing Jews, Blacks, and every other ethnicity/religion on the face of the earth. There are entire websites devoted to your hateful ideals.

      “Why can’t I do the things above without fear of undue punishment?”

      You can, as many others have. You only have the right to be free from legal punishment, not social punishment. Consider this; much of your punishment comes as a result of you inspiring hatred in other people. Your arguments, founded on hatred, make people dislike you, and you are subject to the consequences of their judgments. That’s not an infringement on any of your rights, it’s a consequence of you making an unlikable and untrue argument. Either deal with it, or cry more.

      Finally, do you want a simple example of why record companies don’t try these ideas; they are run by people who already have well-established ideas about how a business should run. Do you think the 70-year old head of a company wants to try something like giving things away for free, a tactic that would have been idiotic in his day and age? Probably not. It’s not a result of a desire for control, it’s the stasis of businessmen who don’t want to leave established tactics.

      • Dnla

         *I was making the answer, but then clicked on Space and my entire response disappeared, so I had to write it again*

        “You do have the right to upload the videos. You do not have the right to be shielded from criticism based on what you upload. If you post something that appears bigoted and hateful, you’re”

        Who said I’m shielded from criticism? Do you mean that if my video appears “bigoted” and “hateful” to some people, then it should be censored? That’s not how freedom of speech and democracy works, that’s how the things work in a tiranny. If they really dislike my point of view, wouldn’t it help if they actually countered my arguments with real facts and evidence? They could also dislike the video, though that alone obviously doesn’t make them any more right. But it’s still better than just plain removing a video because some people disliked it. That’s called repression and censorship. I know there are plenty of videos expressing views totally different from mine on Youtube and other sites. Does it mean I have the right to have the video removed, even if I dislike it? Obviously not. I just don’t visit such videos, or do one or more of the things above (except, of course, asking for the video to be removed).

        “Oh, and most of those videos aren’t taken down. You can go on youtube or any other video service and see many examples of hateful rhetoric demonizing Jews, Blacks, and every other ethnicity/religion on the face of the earth. There are entire websites devoted to your hateful ideals.”

        Most aren’t, fair enough. But those that get many views and get noticed are. BTW, if you think that stating cold facts about the horrible things the jews did in the past is “hateful rhetoric demonizing the poor Jews”, then more power to you. What about the Nazi that killed lots of lives during WW2, and Stalin killing literally millions of people during his dictatorship? You do agree that’s horrible, don’t you? But if I remember to you that 241 US service men were allowed to be killed in Lebanon by Israel, is that “hateful” and “untrue” as well? Don’t make me laugh. I’ll also mention that jew families own almost all the major private banks in the world, and what do you know, nearly all the countries are indebted, including the trillions by the USA! What about the blue prints of the atomic bomb that they sent to the Communist Russia in 1945, that were made in USA? Do you even know about the dozens of the deportations of jews from Europe during the Middle Age? Surely that would be for some reason. All the UN resolutions that Israel has violated? Maybe you also believe that USA and Israel are “best frendz!111!1!1″?
        And all the things I mentioned are just a drop in the ocean, mind you. I do not hate the jews because they’re jews. I don’t think that all the jews are bad (maybe not even half of them is, there’s no way to measure). In fact, I fully respect those that merely live their lifes (like me). But their many higher-ups (“many” as in all those throughout history) are responsible for their reputation. If you seriously think that I’m telling all this out of pure hate, then at least try to make an actual argument that supports that statement. Name calling isn’t the way.

        “You can, as many others have. You only have the right to be free from legal punishment, not social punishment. Consider this; much of your punishment comes as a result of you inspiring hatred in other people. Your arguments, founded on hatred, make people dislike you, and you are subject to the consequences of their judgments. That’s not an infringement on any of your rights, it’s a consequence of you making an unlikable and untrue argument. Either deal with it, or cry more.”

        Except you’re not free from legal punishment. Try to go into an UN, EU or any other international conference and ask if the “6 million Jews killed” figure is right, and if yes, where is the undeniable evidence. At best you’ll just lose your job. You could very well end up behind the bars.
        And I don’t even need to make such a video. Go to Youtube and you’ll find them. I suggest you to start taking the mainstream press with a grain of salt and try to find some TRUTH about history. And not the one they teach you in school either (that’s filtered as well). I’ve already answered to the rest of your point above.

        “Finally, do you want a simple example of why record companies don’t try these ideas; they are run by people who already have well-established ideas about how a business should run. Do you think the 70-year old head of a company wants to try something like giving things away for free, a tactic that would have been idiotic in his day and age? Probably not. It’s not a result of a desire for control, it’s the stasis of businessmen who don’t want to leave established tactics.”

        That’s ONE of the reasons, true. But others will also want to control the business. Do you not seriously think that corporations and major companies DON’T want to control the market, if they can easily be successful that way? That’s how pretty much every multinational ended up after their darling years ended (Microsoft, Apple, etc).

  • The_seventh_guest

    Im sure the RIAA will come out with a threat to all their artists that if they join MegaBox hell will fall upon them and the devil himself will appear in front of their eyes (which btw will be very appealing to some of the artists, like those cool heavy metal bands from norway), and possibly telling them that Kim Dotcom is going to commit fraud and wont pay them what they deserve, etc etc, and finally RIAA will try to extend their contract ad infinitum with them to avoid them leave their outdated service (who will print your CDs, vinyls, cassestes and 8-tracks, dont leave!)

  • Derf

    Top idea, I hate modern music, Disco, Boogie, Pop, The lyrics go on and on and on, oh how I wish they would stop, but still a top idea.

    Best of Britsh luck to you Mr Dotcom

  • http://twitter.com/Power2All Power2All

    I would use it to release my shit :)

  • Pingback: Dotcom prepara el lanzamiento de MegaBox y asegura que “grandes artistas” ya se sumaron Noticias

  • Guardian1uk

    and can i just suggest that they tell the BPI RIAA etc to FUCK OFF and not allow them ANYWHERE near this new service :)

  • 7seven85

    I hope with this project that Kim will become even more richer than he was with Megaupload.
    Good luck Kim ! You can be sure I will use Megabox !!

    • KimIamDissapoint

      Why doesnt Kim ask for 1% and give the artists 99% instead? Hes extremely wealthy already, and hes still profiting from the business if he does this.

      The artists should be able to pocket as much money as possible.

      I have lost a lot of respect for Kim as soon as I saw his Twitter account. Even though its a good thing he is doing, there is no need to be so arrogant about everything.

      • Shdl28

         yes as a person he is wealthy but to buy real power through lobing, to be able to protect megabox, he needs a lot of money. and once megabox is a 10 bilion company then all the mppa and riaa can run and cover in a corner, cause he will be able to buy entire movie studios. i mean entire sony corp is worth like 14 bilion. if dotcom buys 30% of sony, mpaa and riaa will implode from within

  • Hogspace

    It isn’t going to have the big music archives, only the new stuff, so pretty limited. But if it puts the media moguls and iTunes out of business I’ll buy. 

    • Glib

      … at first, yes.  However, a very solid part of the MAFIAAs profit comes from the first few week’s sales of a record.  Imagine how punishing it will be if any notable amount of those sales are plundered by Mr. Dotcom … crazy.

      • Anyone

        plundered?

  • dwpbike

    i’m ready, why isn’t megabox?       SEARCH RESULT
    Search For : ambient music
    NO RECORD FOUND

  • Pingback: Dotcom MegaBox preparing to launch and that “great artists” and joined | Tech News Pedia

  • Mwhahaha

    If that guy jumped off a cliff I think TF would follow him. ‘Some top artists’. Hmpf. When labels say things that meaningless you call them into question.

    So if you don’t want to buy the music you have to put up with adverts, so it’s like commercial radio, just where you get to pick the playlist. People love adverts right? They don’t do whatever they can to avoid them ever. 

    Also if the songs acquired freely can only play on specific devices which support that app, isn’t that in essence a form of DRM? Something that TF is ever so vocal about when it comes to labels using it.

    None of this looks that new or exciting to me, just a cobbled together version of services that already exist. 

    In essence it’s itunes radio, with the ability to pay to stop the adverts.

    I assume once you’ve paid you can transfer the songs to any device.

     This reminds me of a thing ages ago where they were on about putting ads in the middle of phone calls to make those free. Whatever happened to that innovatory breakthru? hmm.

    Right now we’re seeing MU trying to replace the labels to become the dominant force in the industry. If that happens, they’ll float then be behoven to shareholders and stock prices and in turn will start making decisions which fuck off the consumer. All corporations turn out the same way, no matter where they start. We need the end of corporations controlling media and all but a tiny % going to the creative forces behind what we enjoy.

    • Guest

       It is so obvious that Mwhahaha is a troll no doubt working for the RIAA et all lol

      • Guest

        On the contrary, I think he makes a number of valid points.

        Don’t hate just because you disagree, counter his argument with your own.  So far all you’ve offered here is an ad hominem attack on his character…

        • BigHi5

           Why are you replying to yourself.

        • Censored

           Troll

    • Anyone

      you can pay for MegaBox, the adware is if you don’t want to pay

      • Logos

         And if I don’t want to pay, don’t want the adware, and do want the music?

        • Anyone

          go to thepiratebay as usual

    • http://profiles.google.com/orfetheo Orfeas Theofanis

      My only problem with megabox is that it replaces advertisements from OTHER sites with theirs…
      Why can’t they just have advertisements in the megabox site and pay the artists accordingly?
      I mean when a song gets thousands or millions of hits per day, that’s some good space for advertisements.

      But Mwhahaha , believe it or not, nothing can be free without advertisements. 
      Unless you do it for fun.
      But you can’t ask a singer to put his life on his job (singing) and not be compensated at all…

      • MarlaHughes

        Pirates have been doing that for years. In fact Dotcom encouraged them to do so. 

    • John Spartan

      It hasn’t been mentioned that you will only be able to play the music through the megakey app. If there is indeed this kind of DRM then, yes, MegaKey will surely fail, but you are jumping to conclusions.
      It has ONLY been stated that you need the Megakey app to DOWNLOAD the music, NOT PLAY IT.

  • RandomGuest

    Intrested in the buy feature if the artists are getting 90% of the money. Iinstead of 90% going to “dinosaur record labels”, as it is now.

    Not so intrested in the add-steal app, as that means the artists are going to be stealing revinue from others, which is just as bad as the dinosaur’s stealing the artists money to start with.

  • Alyssa Blindy

    What concerns me a bit, just a tiny bit, is the fact that since the music must be played through the mega key app, it is like a form of DRM that Dotcom is putting on the free music. I hope he doesn’t put DRM on the songs when people buy them. I also hope they are a bit less pricey than iTunes $1.29 songs.

    • Dsf

       do you not understand the word free?

      • Alyssa Blindy

        Of course I do. The songs that are free, have to be played in a certain application. This is a form of DRM being put on the music. You can not disagree with that. The article also said you can buy the music. I was saying that I hope that the sold music for those who do not want the application has no other DRM on it. Have I cleared my comment up enough for you now?

    • Www2

      Mega key is a browser plugin/addon and i think when mega key detect the megabox url he send a spesial header to megabox and day he i am here and can your give the music to this person for free?

  • Lulz

    Clear evidence of a Mega conspiracy to defraud the music industry of its bloated profit margins.

  • Pingback: Top Artists Line Up for Kim Dotcom’s Megabox | Mediafire Search Engine

  • Guest

    I believe you said something about top artists…

  • Megakeyblocker

    I wonder how long after the release it will take for hackers to release a “MegaKey” blocker……………………. 30 min?

  • Amused

    This will never happen. Record companies will never let it happen. I believe they will happily have people assassinated to stop it. Kim Dotcom…watch your back.

  • Anonymous

    I would love to use this knowing the artists are getting paid fair sums of money.
    The model is similar to other services such as Spotify and if spread wide enough could be a major hit. Even with restrictions, the best part of this is knowing a record label will not be making money here.

    • Monster

       yeah…only dotcom.  LOL

      So the labels are replaced by him Same game just switching faces.

      • Anyone

        but in this case he gets 10% and the artist 90%, not the other way around like with labels

  • Pingback: Kim DotCom asegura que varios artistas ya se sumaron al lanzamiento de MegaBox | conecti.ca

  • ActionCalvin

    Dotcom is a con artist. Stop pedestalizing the guy. Any artist who “signs” up for this is an idiot.

    • Neil.

       You sound scared.

    • DocGerbil100

      “Pedestalizing”?

      You’re an American, aren’t you. :D

      • Shhhhh

        Americans are sensitive. If you start pointing out they stole every idea they ever had, they get all defensive and call you names….

        …in a language they stole.

  • anonymous

    Putting ads on megabox site is fair, but replacing others ads isn’t fair in my opinion. What they are going to do is, helping artist but ruining other webmasters. 

    am i missing something?

    • Reason

       It isn’t their job to help other webmasters. Their only responsibility is to help their customers, both the artists and the consumers. Outside of that, it’s not their concern.

  • http://twitter.com/bbgameruk BBgamer

    Not really happy about the whole adware scenario and replacing adverts on other websites. Many websites rely on the stream of income from adverts to stay up. This is basically taking all the revenue from them and giving it to Mr Dotcom. 

    No doubt there’ll be a userscript/chrome extension to fake the install of MegaKey.

  • Monster

    He’s just as bad as the Record labels.  He’s out for money plain and simple. He says the artist will get all this money but he wouldnt do it unless he was getting the majority of it. …just like the labels.  LOL 

  • Sketch

    meh, i’ll still use bit torrent……

    • ScrewEwe2

      I’ll still use BitTorrent too, or whatever file acquisition protocol follows. I’m not interested in being tied to a computer or smart phone so I can listen to a song via a browser ap. I will take what I want, from where I want, how I want and when I want so I can share it with who I want and how I want. When MegaBox can get me free cracked versions of Autodesk 3ds Max, Adobe CS6 or the complete catalogue of Janes Addiction’s discography in FLAC format I’ll take notice.

      I wish Kim the best of luck in the Mega Upload case and also in the MegaBox endeavor.

  • Pingback: Kim DotCom asegura que varios artistas ya se sumaron al lanzamiento de MegaBox

  • RankoNanko

    I dont get it man, how does fatboy do it? Scary.
    Mostly-Anon.tk 

  • Pingback: Torrent News » Certains des meilleurs artistes au monde feraient la queue pour être présents sur MEGABOX!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Gear-Mentation/100003097514663 Gear Mentation

    I have absolutely no intention of using this service, but if the software is benign I would install it just to support this effort!  What do I care where the adverts come from?  I also love the idea of subverting the control of advertisers.

  • Neil.

    The shills are out in force on this one.
    Looks like the music industry thinks thus could succeed.

  • Blown away by idiots

    This is completely ignorant, and proves that Kim has absolutely no idea how the business side of entertainment works.

    First of all, “major record labels” that Kim claims to want to put out of business are the folks responsible for funding the music that delusional pirates think is their right to consumer free of charge.

    Second of all, it doesn’t matter what Kim, Megabox, or the artists themselves would “like” to do. Artists who have signed their rights away in exchange for money (or >80% of the music listened to on any music service, or pirated, for that matter) have no choice in the matter. Let them do an illegal deal with Megabox to collect “90% of the revenue”. Any artist who has a record deal that collects 1 penny from Megabox will immediately be sued by the contract-holding label.

    The thing that idiots like Kim, or anyone who thinks they are justified in stealing music they haven’t paid for, forget, is that no one forces an artist to sign a record contract. The artist does it on their own free will. And because of the large sum of money the label invests in the artist, everyone gets to listen to music for free on the radio and Spotify, or purchase the music legally from any of the number of retail outlets that exist. IF MAJOR LABELS DIDN’T FUND THE MUSIC THAT YOU STEAL, THERE WOULD BE NO KATY PERRY AND LADY GAGA. And whether you think that Katy Perry and Lady Gaga are good or bad, the fact remains that it is the most listened to and the most pirated music out there.

    Quit whining about what is actually a very clear and willful agreement that the artist makes with the label. Quit deluding yourself that you are owed music for free. You are owed nothing in this life. Especially entertainment.

    This will fail as does every ignorantly put together business plan does. Without question.

    • Neil.

       If artists are free to sign with the music monopoly (not much freedom when there isn’t any real alternative though) then they are equally free to sign with Megabox which is something that terrifies people like you.
      But you keep on supporting the status quo with all the other greedy Luddite.

      • Blown away by idiots

        Hey Neil.

        I happen to work in technology innovation. Just the rare case of an innovator who has respect for the protection of intellectual property and capitalism. Maybe I wasn’t teased enough in high school. And I’m the opposite of a luddite, so you’re really putting the ASS in assume.

        If Megabox wants to start a new contract with unsigned artists, then you are absolutely correct. Unsigned artists are free to sign with whomever they want. But I don’t think this is what Kim or anyone involved has in mind.

        Kanye West can NOT sign up with Megabox, or Def Jam will sue him and Megabox. Who is going to want to use a service with only unsigned artists on board? Not the people who use Pirate Bay, according to the statistics presented right here on Torrentfreak.

        No one is forced to sign with a music “monopoly” (although it is technically an oligarchy with a small but widely distributed long tail). However, if you want to be a pop star, you really have no other choice. Becoming a pop star takes millions in resources. And you blame artists for wanting to achieve this status? I don’t.

        All artists that are in it for the art – don’t sign to majors! Sign with Megabox. And maybe if you put in enough hours and are actually good, the time will come when you can negotiate with labels on your terms, because you’ll have negotiating power. And then you can include a clause in your contract to do a deal with Megabox.

        I’m not terrified. Not scared. Nope. Not even a little. I’m blown away by ignorance is the correct description.

        -B.A.B.I.

        • http://www.facebook.com/people/Gear-Mentation/100003097514663 Gear Mentation

           I’d like to see some documentation- does an artist sign away all future work to a label?

        • Neil.

          @BlackPropeller:disqus
          Of course they don’t, this guy is such an obvious shill, desperate to ridicule this business model because it it something that could actually succeed. He obviously doesn’t believe in competition and thinks the current monopoly and feudalistic contracts cannot be challenged and also that artists should be like indentured servants bound to their masters for life. As much as this guy might dislike the idea all contracts have a limited time and once over artists are free to sign another with whoever they choose however much this chump might pretend otherwise.

        • Legbamel Not-Pop

           They sign away rights to the music the label produces, which is the music that everyone wants to steal, anyway.  And they commit to making so many records and probably x number of appearances and whatnot.  Any music they make under that contract belongs to the contract holder, not the musician.  THAT’S why they can’t put it on MegaWhatever without the consent of the label.

          The contract expires once its terms have been fulfilled but the ownership of the music does not revert to the performer.  The writer has control of the lyrics and the composer control of the instrumentation, in some if not many cases, but the recorded (digitized, over-produced) performance sold on the platinum album belongs to the label.  All MegaStuff does it try to set itself up as distribution for future albums if a massively-popular artist does go indie.  They’d have to convince their auto-tune artists to go with them, though.

  • mc007

    As artists you still need labels for promotions outside the net ! That’s indeed stupid to say :  “solved”

  • FukuSOPA

    I’m for this 110%! Next the movie industry needs to go down this way. They are the biggest fucks in existence.

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/YQSLS3F7VIQZS2CQNPWQCF6344 Barber

    what Francis said I am surprised that a single mom able to profit $4080 in one month on the internet. did you see this web link (Click on menu Home more information)  http://goo.gl/4O4Zp   

  • Guest

    The replacing other ads with megabox ads seems to me like it would be a violation of antitrust law unless there’s a way for webmasters to block it from working on their sites

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Gear-Mentation/100003097514663 Gear Mentation

       I doubt that, since it is user-installed, and thus the user is responsible, not the advertiser or creator of the program.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Gear-Mentation/100003097514663 Gear Mentation

    Question: do the artists who are with the MAFIAA sign away their rights to all their works?  Are they unable to go to another label… or to Megabox?

    • Blown away by idiots

      Gear Mentation,

      Every contract is specific to an artist, and the amount of bargaining power an artist has is also different, so there is not a single answer to your question.

      However, the vast majority (>90%) of contracts artists sign give away EXCLUSIVE distribution rights. Those exclusive rights are why the label gives the artist money, invests millions in promotion and tours, and pays money to radio stations to launch hit songs.

      Sometimes these rights do not extend to every album or song that an artist has created, for example, if an indie label released a debut album, that album may or may not be covered in a subsequent contract. Often, the label will purchase the rights to that debut album from the indie label, though.

      -B.A.B.I.

      • Guest

        And once the contract has expired then the MAFIAA cannot sue them and they are FREE to go to Megabox

        • Blown away by idiots

          Guest,

          You’re missing the point. The contract does not “rent” the recordings. It buys the recordings. Any sound recordings bought by the label through the contract are the property of the label forever. When the contract is over, the artist can sell new recordings to a new label, or stay independent. See Radiohead.

          Note to TorrentFreak: It seems that a large number of your readers are grossly ignorant of how the entertainment industries function and how (and more importantly, WHY) business is done in its current manifestation, for better or worse. Maybe an impartial (too much to ask?) description of these industries would benefit the discussion. The risk is that when your readers learn how and why things are done the way they are, they might lose some of that vitriol that characterizes them so well, and lose some of the passion that drives them to your site every day, and you might lose out on your advertising revenue.

          -B.A.B.I.

        • http://www.facebook.com/people/Gear-Mentation/100003097514663 Gear Mentation

          Yes, in response to “Blown away by idiots” below, I agree that a discussion why things are done the way they are would be helpful. The thing is, the way it’s done is dead.  This is a given, no matter why it’s done that way.  So what we’re wondering here is, “why should people be prosecuted for doing things a new way?”  We are angry that certain people don’t want to change, and are taking it out on individuals or trying to reverse the change by passing more laws… which will only have the effect of making some people miserable and violating their rights, rather than the supposedly desired result of eliminating the new paradigm.  Because of this dynamic, you have the vitriol.  (And why is it impossible to respond directly to “Blown away by idiots” below?).

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Gear-Mentation/100003097514663 Gear Mentation

         I see, thanks.  Yes, that would be a limiting factor.  Well, I hope there is some way for artists to adapt to the new environment.

      • Conservative

        Blown Away by Idiots wrote “…
        and pays money to radio stations to launch hit songs.”

        Do you have any proof that this record label actually paid money to a radio station?  Or are you merely repeating what they want you to believe?  What is the name of the record label and how much did they pay?  For which song did they pay? 

        Thanks for the info.

  • Pingback: Kim Dotcom. Hollywood’s Arch Villain or Scary New Future. « techhollywood

  • ACTA_FOOL

    BREAKING NEWS CANADA!

    Copyright Act Bill C-11 has just passed Senate and awaiting Royal Assent.
     

    • ACTA_FOOL

       The Governor-General has granted Royal Assent to Bill C-11, the Copyright Modernization Act.

      Now the law

    • hmmm

      fuck

  • http://7-books.net/ SleepyJohn

     Kim Dotcom may seem an unlikely hero but they don’t all come in spangled tights and capes. Thanks to the despicable behaviour of the MAFIAA and its US Government goons-for-hire he has garnered a lot of public sympathy and huge, priceless worldwide publicity. Now, thanks to the integrity of the NZ Chief Judge, it seems likely he will escape the clutches of the Third World mentality gangsters that control the ‘Land of the Free’.

    If he then sets up Megabox as described he will undoubtedly become a
    hero to those of us who genuinely fear the internet being taken over by the
    criminals of the American MAFIAA. And if he makes a lot of money by
    providing both artists and customers with a first-rate service, then
    good luck to him. Future entrepreneurs will have something to learn
    from that.

    And even if he simply opens people’s eyes to a possible different pathway, and sticks one on the odious turds of the MAFIAA in the process, he will get my vote for that. Nothing, but nothing could be worse than the present system. And the question of artists currently signed to labels is irrelevant – I doubt they can contractually fart without being sued, so they will have to live with that. This is about the future, and I know where I would look first if I were a young musician, just as young writers are going straight to the likes of Smashwords rather than spend years trailing round traditional publishers in search of the hopeless old-fashioned dream.

  • Chrish9899

    I suspect this will lead to lots of rights disputes between labels and artists, or are all these “big” artists producing the music that’s availible on megabox ENTIRERLY themselves?

  • Pingback: Kim Dotcom asegura que varios artistas ya se sumaron al lanzamiento de Megabox | SYSCOM-GUEPAL

  • Half Life

    This technically is the reason the RIAA got the U.S government to go after him in the first place. Any idiot could see that.

    I am sorry to say, the U.S. government has no interests in the people, only big businesses who throw money at political gifts and campaigns. It’s so fucking sad, it hurts.

    If you look at most of the laws in America, the enforment, penalties, and fees just to defend yourself, you have more god damned rights in Iran than here.

    For example, you go out with friends, have two beers, then drive home. A DUI will land you the same penalties as an armed thief. You steal a few million as a banker and you get 10 years, you rape a child you get 10 years, or the kill a mini-mart worker and you get six years. The judicial system doesn’t care about you. All they care about is fucking you.

    • DocGerbil100

      “This technically is the reason the RIAA got the U.S government to go after him in the first place. Any idiot could see that.”

      Maybe I’m an idiot, but actually, I didn’t draw that conclusion when the MU bust first took place.  I thought the logistical hassle of getting that many multi-national police forces to carry out raids in synchrony made it impossible for the (then relatively-recent) announcement to have had anything to do with it.

      I only changed my opinion afterward, when I started reading comments here about US government agencies allegedly wiretapping suspects and then getting retrospective warrants for it – I hadn’t realised the US legal system was quite that badly broken. :/

  • DocGerbil100

    Hmmm…  “Can this system work?”, I ask myself.

    • Are there good and / or popular performing artists, songwriters, producers, etc, unhappy with the status quo with regard to the revenue split between publishers, distributors and creators?
    - I think the answer is yes – and in large numbers.

    • Are enough of them unhappy enough to want to take a risk with Megabox?
    - Based on the Megasong, the answer would seem to be yes.

    • Are there enough of these creative workers currently or imminently outside of the restrictive contracts imposed by their usual publishers for there to be a marketable quantity of new material produced in the first year?
    - Yes, the nature of the industry is such that there are always good artists (etc) reaching the end of their contracts at any given time.

    • Does Kim and / or his team have the connections and influence necessary to get them to produce material for Megabox?
    - Based (again) on the Megasong, the answer would seem to be yes.

    • Do they have the ability to create a browser-based system that does what it’s supposed to, without undue hassles for the end user?
    - Given the effectiveness of Megaupload, the answer would seem to be plainly, yes.

    • Do they have enough marketing savvy to sell both the new service and the works therein to the “average” punter?
    - Given (again) the effectiveness of Megaupload’s marketing, as well as the Megasong, the answer would seem to be plainly, yes.

    • Aside from Kim and much of his team fighting a massive legal battle, is there any obvious legal impediment to launching this service?
    - None I can think of, although it’s not impossible that UMG could go completely batshit crazy and risk everything with a swarm of bogus DMCAs and court-submissions to try and cut off Megabox’s payment-providers (UMG’s managers would be fined heavily and might well go to jail for perjury afterwards, but that wouldn’t necessarily stop them – they haven’t exactly been rational so far).

    • Are there a large number of ethical file-sharers who are (like myself) prepared to support this venture with real money for the artists they like, as a matter of principle?
    - Based purely on the number of Steam users who also have BT clients installed (latest count = over 41%, or around $410,000,000 a year for the games industry), the answer would seem to be yes.

    • Is there a swarm of trolls on TF trying hard to convince us that it’s guaranteed to fail, without actually giving any particularly compelling reasons why?
    - Yes.

    • Does my gut-instinct tell me this has a chance of success?
    - Barring substantial, plainly-dishonest and almost-certainly illegal intervention by the US government, I think it probably will, yes.

    • Are there likely to be big, fat, salty tears soaking into my snowy-white pillow when the RIAA’s biggest supporters start going out of business?
    - Not bloody likely.

    Let’s see what happens. :D

  • jojo

    this guy is brilliant- one o the great innovators of our time

  • Guest

    I’m lucky I haven’t uninstalled megakey and megaupload uploader yet! Crush all the greedy large corporations and spread free information around!

  • http://twitter.com/DHRYDER305 Josh

    I have a question. most if not all of these “top artists” are chained to record deals. meaning they dont own their music. how are they going to get the music on there if the music labels own it. alot of the artists have their own record label but its always partnered with a major label.

  • Guest

    this will take a few years to “flower”, since when a recording company signs you, you have to sign a future deal also. you must meet the requirements of those contracts before you can publish your own music & post it without them. Prince had that problem and they spanked him by taking his name for a few years.

    the main problem i see with this business model is that the recording companies can post the artist’s contracted content & still keep raking in the dough. the same holds true for authors & actors. crazy signing contracts lock them in to signing deals that are impossible to break. (just ask “the Rock” about Disney!)

  • PRIVACY is priceless to me

    The U$A is guilty of conspiracy against humanity. No other excuse of a country has ever conspired to exterminate and enslave all humanity has they do!

    And piracy will survive the megashit fiasco, there’ll be piracy until humanity grows up and gets rid of religion/capital/state forever.

    ANARCHY NOW!

  • divide by zer0

    Who are these “world’s top artists” who have signed up for Megabox? Any names released?

    Also, people say 10% is too much for KD but operating costs, advertising, salaries, future legal bombardments etc need to be paid for. And, we don’t know how much the tracks will cost (a shed load less than through iTunes I imagine) so it’s a bit soon to say 10% is too much.

  • Pingback: Top Artists Line Up for Kim Dotcom’s Megabox | Hackton - Latest file sharing news blog

  • Pingback: Free and thinking » Musik - IDG.se - Störst på IT, dagliga IT-nyheter, tester, forum, guider och nyhetsbrev mm

  • http://www.webstatsart.com/ Webstats Art

    The more options for artists, the better it is for them

  • http://7-books.net/ SleepyJohn

    You only have to look at what is happening in the book publishing industry to see that something along Megabox lines is a dead cert to be successful, and is thus quite clearly the real reason for the Megaupload raid, as many have observed. It is now possible for an aspiring author to send a simple Word file to Smashwords and have it converted for free into half a dozen or more digital book formats, which Smashwords will then put up for sale in a number of big outlets including Apple. All within 2 days and all for free and no binding contract of any kind. Smashwords takes a straightforward small cut from the sale of each book. There is talk of adverts subsidising even this. All production, editing and marketing are under the total control of the authors, and firms are springing up like mushrooms to offer such individual services.

    Authors sell books for between 1 and 3 dollars mostly, so the opportunities for both authors and readers are quite phenomenal. Traditional publishers have to accept it and move with the times, or move out. The spoilt, vicious little criminal brat that is the US Media Industry will have to do the same. Never mind the kerfuffle that will ensue to begin with as musicians discover the real small print in their contracts; the crunch will come when the bottomless pit of starstruck aspiring musicians that the Industry has in the past been able to ruthlessly milk at its leisure will dry up in a few minutes flat when the likes of Megabox (and doubtless many competing clones) takes off.

    Even the MAFIAA and its government goons will not be able to order aspiring musicians to sign up with them. I don’t think there is any question that Megabox spells DOOM for the US Music Industry as it stands, and therefore should be supported whatever you think of the man running it. If he can get past the legal thuggery on offer from his competiters and establish the precedent, he will pave the way for many others to follow, so you will be able to choose the one you prefer.

    You can even choose the traditional route if you like, and sign a contract recently described by a long-serving musician  in NZ as “close to legal slavery”. However, my researches would indicate that this is not a viable option for the future.

  • César Equis

    Way to go Dotcom, time to bury those living dead pigs of the music industry!

  • GuyFaceAwesomeSaucem

    So this works by switching a websites ads with MegaBox ads. So instead of taking money away from artists and record labels, we are now taking money away from websites (which often typically need revenue more than many artists)?

    Whilst I think the music industries business model is outdated, I’d be much happier for the music industry to lose money than small websites which depend on their advertising for revenue.

    • Lovingdesigns

      Switching SOME ads, not all. Since many people already use ad-blockers i don’t think Megabox will make much of a difference.

  • hmmm

    megabox is just adware? Lame, had hoped for something better.

  • Guest

    I like it.
    Uses the same simple add based system used by radio, tv and pirate sites but gives almost all profits to the artists and it is so simple that everyone could use it.

  • Miami Sunset

    In the meantime people can get free music from Mininova.

  • Asdf

    I had big hopes for this service, but they are gone now. I don’t want to install an app that has detremental effects on me. Why the hell is it impossible to make a steam pentant for music?? I’d use that. But Megabox isn’t one apparently. Sadly.

  • Pingback: Megabox: Kim Dotcom kündigt Start von Musikdienst an - PC-PEDIA.DE

  • Daniel Hammer

    As far as I can tell http://bandcamp.com already cuts the labels out, and connects the artist directly with the fans, with full “pre-listen” to the songs and download available in most formats. Without any artificial limits on access to artists work across country borders.

    I don’t consider “Megabox” revolutionary, quite the contrary, I consider it redundant and hope that artists focus on delivering content via services that already exists and work.

    I’m not in anyway affiliated with bandcamp.com, I’m just as happy customer that would like to see more diversity on bandcamp.com and I’m annoyed everytime someone new proclaims they’ve created a new solution to a problem that’s already been solved years ago.

    • Lovingdesigns

      I would not call bandcamp’s crippled 30-second tracks an alternative. If i am to even concider buying an album, i wan’t to listen to the whole album several times. Then if i LIKE it, i buy it or try to donate directly to the artists.

  • Daniel Hammer

    double post, removed

  • RonaldoGEne

    Laura… if banners don’t show get served to visitors since they have adblock enabled, they don’t count as traffic, therefore the company doesn’t pay. It’s a basic fucking premise.

    Yes adblock takes away ad revenue. To say otherwise proves you lack some basic knowledge of how websites earn revenue in the first place.

  • Jako klopper

    I think, cause we have been so used to getting things for free, that the thought of paying seems silly. But facing the fact that america wants to be everywhere at once with everything, but not concentrating on the facts on hand, such as the education system, national security and so forth. Kim`s idea seems great. Hopefully is supports international artists like where I am from.

  • http://www.totallyfuzzy.net/ mephisto

    Dotcom should take his problems out on the RIAA and the labels, not take them out on just about every website owner on the web. This is no revolution. This is malware, pure and simple. Many people depend on the miserable couple of dollars they make through advertising on their sites, if only to pay for their monthly server bills, if dotcom thinks he has the right to interfere with that he ain’t no hero but nothing more than a self-serving jerk. 

    You can expect scripts to block his service or anybody using it as soon as it will be released. And don’t expect google/adsense/doubleclick to just take this lying down. Even the biggest label in the world Universal Music is tiny compared to the global advertising industry or even Google alone. Even the RIAA in its entirety means nothing compared to Google alone.

    What the hell are these people thinking that they can just mess around with other people’s source of income like that? Or rather: are these people thinking AT ALL? If they think they can get away with a stunt like this, they haven’t seen nothing yet.  

    As supportive as I have been of Dotcom so far, this is crossing a line that he’d better stay behind. There is NO justfication, none whatsoever, for a service like this, interfering with advertising on other people’s sites, on their property even, strictly taken. What’s next? Inserting his shit into your gmail/hotmail/yahoo mail account?

    This doesnt have anything to do with coming up with a new music distribution model anymore. So Apple is gonna be allowed to do the same thing too then and just Insert or overlay iTunes ads over your adsense ads, or even better over Dotcoms megabox ads. And Google Play has the same rights too then I assume. Where will it end?

    This isn’t gonna stand. His major supporters will turn against him. And it may very well land him in jail. And deservedly so if he’s this arrogant – or is it stupid? – to think that this could even be considered legitimate practices.

  • http://www.facebook.com/paco.meralgl Paco Meralgl

    the use of megakey is stealing to webmasters and spy to the users

  • steve

    I don’t think megakey will stand up in the court system, megakey steals adspace on websites you visit. It has a potential lawsuit in the making.

    Sounds pretty cool though as long as people sign their rights over to mega to digitally distribute it certainly has the potential to fix the scarcity that the current business models have. Hell it even supports the independent musicians that we never get to hear of no thanks to the shitty current music industry. This will challenge their business model and force them to change, but I can see a lot of legal battles ahead.

  • BTGuard - BitTorrent Anonymously

NewsBits

Even more news...

  • The Pirate Bay Isn’t Down Completely, Just Having a Few Issues

    Twitter and Facebook, not to mention the TorrentFreak inbox, are currently alive with complaints that The...

  • Pirate Bay Founder Gottfrid Svartholm on Freedom of Speech

    Freedom of speech is a highly valued commodity, but should people be allowed to say whatever...

  • Blu-ray Anti-Piracy Tech Stops Discs and Promotes Purchases

    An anti-piracy system present in all official Blu-ray players since 2012 has received a fresh update...

  • Foxtel Breeds Pirates by Locking Up Game of Thrones

    One of the main reasons why people turn to piracy is the lack of legal alternatives....

  • UK Student Admits Breaching Sony Copyrights With Leak of PS3 SDK

    Last year an Internet user known as El Nomeo leaked version 3.70 of Sony’s Playstation3 SDK...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

PopularArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.