TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

TV Shack Admin Richard O’Dwyer Will NOT Be Extradited To U.S.

Richard O’Dwyer, the UK-based ex-administrator of the video linking website TVShack, will not be extradited to the US to face copyright infringement charges. After a long and hard battle, spearheaded by his mother and supported by Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales, O’Dwyer struck a deal with the U.S. government. Instead of being extradited the student has signed a “deferred prosecution” agreement which means that he keeps his freedom in exchange for paying compensation to the copyright holders.

richardLast year Richard O’Dwyer was arrested by UK police for operating TVShack, a website that listed user-submitted link to TV-shows.

The UK student has since fought a looming extradition to the US. In March, Home Secretary Theresa May officially approved the extradition request from US authorities, but today the news broke that O’Dwyer will stay a free man.

The former TVShack administrator signed a deferred judgment agreement with the U.S. authorities, the BBC reports this morning. As a result, O’Dwyer’s extradition is off the table. He will not be prosecuted in the U.S. but has agreed to pay a small sum compensation to the rightsholders.

A high Court Judge was informed that Richard’s mother Julia O’Dwyer will have to travel to the U.S. to complete the deal.

It is unclear why the U.S. decided to accept an agreement, but there is little doubt that the public protests organized by O’Dwyer’s mother and Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales played an important role.

Jimmy Wales’ petition alone was signed by more than a quarter million people and was covered widely in the mainstream media.

The MPAA, who are believed to be the prime instigators of the case, were not happy with these campaigns and will probably be disappointed by the deal. A few months ago leaked documents revealed that the movie industry group saw Richard O’Dwyer as a purposeful copyright infringer.

mick“O’Dwyer was not a mere ‘middleman.’ He profited heavily from this activity. To call him a ‘middleman’ suggests a lack of involvement in the illegal activity, which is simply not the case,” MPAA wrote.

“Being 24, posing for newspaper photo shoots in a cartoon sweatshirt, and having your mother and Jimmy Wales speak for you, does not mean you are incapable for breaking the law,” they added.

UK Pirate Party leader Loz Kaye on his turn welcomes the deal.

“This decision vindicates the Pirate Party’s view that the extradition request was disproportionate and unnecessary all along. It does not remove the underlying problem though. The US can not be allowed to be the copyright cops of the world. I hope that Richard and Julia O’Dwyer will be able to begin to rebuild their lives now,” he says.

Interestingly enough, Richard O’Dwyer is not the only administrator of a TV-linking site to negotiate a deferred judgment agreement.

TorrentFreak has learned that Brian McCarthy is working on a similar deal in part due to his medical condition. The owner of Texas-based sports streaming site ChannelSurfing.net was arrested in March 2011 after he had his domain name seized.

For Richard and his mother Julia today’s news marks the end of an uncertain and hectic period. They are being advised not to comment on the specifics of the deal just yet, but promised TorrentFreak that there will be plenty of news later.

Related Posts

Previous Post | Next Post

  • thedude321

    Yes! One for the pirates! :P

    • Anonymous

      The British need to grow a pair (of balls) and stop behaving like puppets to the Americans.

      They did it during the Bush-era, too, with the war in Iraq. Look where it got all of us… a crazy recession affecting the entire world.

      RIAA and MPAA are NOT government bodies, stop treating them like ones. Their interests are strictly financial.

      • John Space

        Rule, Britannia?
        Britannia, rule the waves?
        Britons are now slaves of the US!

        • Violated0

          True enough when this agreement was reached under a DPA (Deferred Prosecution Agreement) which is a standard US method of resolving such conflicts and which they extended to UK use last month.

          Since the UK has so far failed to reform the US/UK Extradition Treaty to allow for a Judge to decide if a UK trial is more appropriate then all this case does is to highlight how US law overrides UK law.

          We can be thankful that it is better than extradition but this is hardly the time to sing the glory of Britannia.

        • Sketch

          Lmao, anytime americans go to beat the fuck outta someone, we always stop by to pick up the brits……just the way it is…..although now that i think about it….the last time the brits went to kick the shit outta someone, they plainly told us to stay the fuck out…..(argentina) wtf is up with that??? lmao

        • http://twitter.com/BeatriceBenson7 Beatrice Benson

          Jimmy Wales’ petition alone was signed by more than a quarter million people and was covered widely in the mainstream media. http://youtube.qr.net/jOj8/watch?v=KTju7uI8-1ouuerccdew

        • TinG

          US loves to create concentration camps, just see their story, they did it many times but used different names for that activity.

        • TinG

          I mean “history” not story, heh.

        • Guest

          Rule, Britannia?
          Britannia, rule the waves?
          Britons are now slaves of the USA!

          FTFY!

        • Anon

          Yeah w.e your comment is a load of nonsense… lol

      • PenzancePeer

        According to the ‘Torygraph’ O’Dweyer Admitted making 15k a month from advertising on his site. I notice the TF article studiously avoids mentioning what he was actually making ? as well as what the ‘Small’ settlement might be ??

        I imagine that even after costs, he must have been making a fair rake each month? And we really ought not to be sticking up for Clever Dicks who use the mantle of ‘Sharing’ as a useful cover for making loads a money ?????

        • etherkye

          Google makes millions from linking to websites, some of which offer infringing content. All he did was have links as well, so he has done nothing more then google does.

          Also, what he did is LEGAL under UK and EU law, and theres no laws against linking to websites in US law either.

          If he was doing something illegal, then he should have been taken to court and tried, not gone though this stupid farce.

          So sorry Penzance, there is nothing wrong with him making money from links!

          Also, they said in the article that they are not allowed to give details on the settlement or any other details on the case. If you had read the last paragraph then you’d have known that.

        • OccamsKatana

          Regardless, in your opinion, do you feel it’s alright for a foreign body to impose their laws on a sovereign state, when in that sovereign state, no law was broken?

          Short version of that question so you can understand it: In your opinion, is it ok to have the United States be the world police?

          I think you’re missing the whole point of the entire proceedings…..

        • PenzancePeer

          ”Also, they said in the article that they are not allowed to give details on the settlement or any other details on the case. If you had read the last paragraph then you’d have known that.”

          Convenient I’d say :) its likely the Settlement will be for tens of thousands ? and compared to what the guy was pulling, wont be out of order.

          Some of you blokes need to get a grip, amidst all of the shouts of ‘Sharing’ seems there’s plenty who wouldn’t mind living the high life from pirated material ? And thats supposed to be the dividing line line ??

          I’m a BIG fan of Torrented material, but I do realise, that often Clever Dick’s will swim with the shoal for personal gain. The facts reveal this kid to be nothing more than a piss taker who was getting Rich on the back of efforts that were not his own, no doubt had he continued, eventually he would have gone on to become a Tory MP, much like the current Cabinet Minister who made a killing from selling Scraping Software :)

        • Wallace

          “And we really ought not to be sticking up for Clever Dicks who use the mantle of ‘Sharing’ as a useful cover for making loads a money ?????”

          What he did was legal, so yeah, we should. He should owe zero dollars. The planned extradition was an amoral shell game, nothing more, and it proved once again that rightsholders in these cases have no moral authority or moral high ground. Their opinions on filesharing are as relevant to me as Ted Bundy’s opinions on rape.

        • Anyone

          he provided a service that people liked and got money for it through ads
          nothing wrong with that

        • Guest

          @PenzancePeer

          The ads on his popular website generated revenue for him. Aside from my distate for ads in general, I fail to see the problem with this…?

        • Maldoror

          In normal times he would have been put up as the poster boy for young British entrepreneurs. US and UK governments and the **AA have been spinning this from day one.

      • JordanKratz

        RIAA & MPAA Are SCUM.I will be more than happy to see them both die.
        Sick and tired of their BS.

        Wishing the best to Richard O’Dwyer.Hope you do not get imprisoned upon your arrival in the States.

      • Guest

        And you really need to learn that UK government opinion != UK people’s opinion.

        Don’t bother replying if you cannot add anything decent to this thread.

    • PirateSoldier

      Compensation for links. The world has gone mad.

    • Who

      Um…NO not one for the pirates. did you read it?

      “O’Dwyer struck a deal with the U.S. government. Instead of being extradited the student has signed a “deferred prosecution” agreement which means that he keeps his freedom in exchange for paying compensation to the copyright holders.”

      he MUST pay them. so once again this copyright horse shit won.

    • BobTheBus

      rdrd

  • Anyone

    sounds good, but I want details of the deal
    I hope he gets compensation for being harassed for so long

    • http://twitter.com/Mathew30 Mathew Lisett

      him get compensation for being harrased. im sorry i thought i was mis reading that. are you nuts. HES the one thats been wrongful treated like shit, broke no laws in the uk and has been pretty much tortured to sign the deal, how they got him to sign it i dont know, but its HIM that now has to pay the copyright holders. which if this does go through, where the hell is google in this. why havent they been treated like shit and made to pay when in effect they have been doign MORE than him for ages

      • Techanon

        To be fair Google is being harassed too by having to process 666.000 DMCA takedowns a week from the RIAA.

        • http://twitter.com/Mathew30 Mathew Lisett

          gee, thats ok then, i wonder what the son would preffer and be ok with, the threat of extradition and treated like a criminal even though he broke 0% law, OR have the take down notices.

          hmmm let me think.

          look the take down notices dont mean squat when its google and they seemingly are getting touched when the very smaller guys and gals are being treated and hunted down every time.

  • http://www.blockaid.me/ BlockAid DNS

    Well done, and a result finally!

  • ScrewEwe2

    This is great news for Richard and his Mother.

  • TrueNorth

    “A high Court Judge was informed that Richard’s mother Julia O’Dwyer will have to travel to the U.S. to complete the deal.”

    yea then the u.s. authorities will hold her as a co-conspiritor in this court case.

    DON`T TRUST THEM!!!

    • Violated0

      From what I can see she (although they say Richard) is travelling to the US in order to pay the small compensation and to swear that he will never infringe on copyright laws ever again. So no need to be concerned when this is just a formality.

      • MadAsASnake

        Which is ridiculous. Pretty much anything you do infringes in MPAA’s view. Also, it is ridiculous to have to agree not to do something again that you weren’t doing in the first place. Gotta say, it’s probably as good a deal has he’s going to get. It is shameful that something this silly being defended robustly by the foriegn office.

    • grommy

      I will pay every month end of my life…hmm, say 3.- euros to compensate if you like to get more bring on and sue me. (remember one month we pirates donated 12. 000.-£ for good cause!)

  • Violated0

    Very good news indeed and a clear win for us. I like so many people condemned the extradition of Richard O’Dwyer so a very happy day for all.

    They did this agreement to save face but since Richard is only a college student then any compensation would indeed be minor. So they have really let him off the hook and this seems to signify a US/UK change in policy. I can’t say why when either the US does not see this as a good policy or the UK has made clear that such cases could well soon move to UK trails which the US do not want.

    Congratulations to Julia and Richard O’Dwyer and all the people who helped make this day possible. Woo hoo we won!

    • Guest

      Yeah, I agree, If it had been someone in there 30′s who was a multi millionaire with an online storage business would they have offered a deal? Of course they wouldn’t.

  • http://twitter.com/MAFIAAFire MAFIAAFire

    Good for Richard, but the case is still as ridiculous as ever.

  • Guest321

    So he signed a deal to buy freedom by paying compensation (money?) to the copyright holders? What kind of victory is this? This is exactly what the copyright trolls want since they know they don’t have any case against him. A clear win would have been if he walked away with no strings attached and was paid compensation for harassment.

    • Violated0

      Do you think it was a good idea for him to say “no”?

      Simply by paying something arbitrary like $50 means the guy is free, no more court appearances, no extradition, no US trial and best of all this is all before Xmas.

      For the MPAA this is a major loss. Then for the US Government this is a huge climb down where this agreement simply done to save some face. So we got a 98% win but that is still great.

      Richard did his TVShack run and now it is over and done with where it is time for him to retire and to allow other people will take his place.

      • TrueNorth

        chances are i bet it will be a hell of a lot more than $50

        AND if she cant pay what they want while she is in the U.S.of A.hole

        they CAN hold her……

        • Violated0

          No it won’t be “a hell of a lot more” than $50 when it may not even be that. This is not some millions of dollars of compensation when for one all news services have called it “small” and second once any sum has been paid, even $1, then the US Government can chalk up their minor win and say “compensation has been paid”

          You can already rest assured that Richard and Julia O’Dwyer already know the exact value when this agreement would not be announced had the amount asked been unaffordable. In other words they would not leave the UK had it not been payable.

          So within the next 14 days they will travel to the USA to sign the deal and pay this small fee. After that this agreement will be shown to the court and the case will be dropped. With the entire world watching there can be no tricky here when if they did the entire world would see their dishonesty and betrayal.

      • OccamsKatana

        So within the next 14 days they will travel to the USA to sign the deal and pay this small fee. After that this agreement will be shown to the court and the case will be dropped. With the entire world watching there can be no trickery here when if they did the entire world would see their dishonesty and betrayal.

        Violated0, I respectfully point out the fact that the US has been very transparent in their trickery and dishonesty, as everyone very well knows…..

        It wouldn’t surprise me in the least if they pulled some bullshit afterwards.

        (we’ve found no evidence of weapons of mass destruction, but decided to rape them anyway….)

        • Violated0

          OK you got me on that point. However if the US were dishonest then they could not use their DPAs again when no one would trust them. So the greatest gain for the USA would be to use DPAs to neuter many threats in the future.

        • OccamsKatana

          @Violated0 I agree with what you’re saying, but really…. The Mighty US does as they please. Behind the scenes there are too many threats under the guise of ‘agreements’. Take Pakistan in the Afghanistan war….. ‘you’re either with us or against us. Allow us into your country or we’ll take it’…

          Fair enough to say we all know the US doesn’t play fair. I’m Canadian and I don’t trust them. But, I suppose when all developed nations are working towards that New World Order (oh, here we go with the conspiracies! LOL!), one is as bad as the next. Why do we pretend that we still have borders when the mighty US disregards said borders? Because they OWN THE WORLD. Fargin Bastages!

      • MadAsASnake

        I suspect the DOJ is starting to smart a bit over the mass of lies and deceptions underlying the Mega case that are starting to be revealed – and don’t want to do it again with a victim who is altogether more likeable than DotCom.

    • dwpbike

      yes – point being he copped a plea

  • Pingback: TV Shack Admin Richard O'Dwyer Will NOT Be Extradited To US - TorrentFreak - Soicalpost

  • Guest

    The deal states that he has to give undertakings not to infringe on copyrights again. He didn’t infringe to begin with. This is not a win. It might be an okay settlement for him but the site was still lawful. The US needs to fuck off trying to bully people into submission.

  • Pingback: TV Shack Admin Richard O’Dwyer Will NOT Be Extradited To US

  • Non

    I’d be a bit scared that this was a scheme to self extradite yourself.
    Once in the US they’ll nab him for whatever they feel like

    • John

      This is exactly my suspiscion too. Since the Mckinnon case falling through I wouldn’t put it past the US to resort to trickery like this. There’s no sanctions or diplomatic presure the UK could impose that would have any effect. We would just have to roll over and continue with the “special relationship”

  • Embrace Change

    Next up, Kim Dotcom – except there won’t be any agreements, just the USA paying, paying, paying.

    • ThumbsUpThumbsDown

      They may not fare so well once they get him over the pond.

      The case is a monument to the iniquity of existing copyright law and the corporate monopolists that it privileges.

      DotCom is a savvy media manipulator who would very effectively and very publicly attack every single weak spot of that regime.

      In this, he would attract and receive broad political, legal, economic and journalistic support.

      At first, It would be freewheeling war as circus; but, it would end up inevitably in the Constitutionally obsessed universe of the Appellate Courts. That’s not the happiest environment for a DOJ that has acted more like a political hatchet, than a judicial prosecutor.

      What would it mean for Corporate Copyright Distributors if DotCom and MegaUpload were exonerated in the great American homeland?

      Change. It would mean change.

    • TEAM AMERICA

      The Govt won’t be paying a single dime to him. His funds will get released where deemed possible, but all USD funds will be locked forever.

      How do you sue a Govt when the Judge has been paid off already…D’oh?

      • Guest

        I think most of Megauploads money that was seized was banked in Hong Kong and they seized these assets at the request of the US.

  • Kirk

    What a BOSS

  • T2

    id give them the middle finger. what other people do in their country is THERE business period.

  • ThumbsUpThumbsDown

    The settlement brings finality for O’Dwyer.

    Yet, British Subjects, (and the world’s citizens, generally), still face the menace of unreciprocated American claims of extra-territorial jurisdiction.

    We can choose to see this problem in terms of American power; but, perhaps it can be more clearly understood in terms of a fundamentally indecent disregard for national sovereignty on the part of local politicians who appear willing to concede anything in order to sit and smoke and banter around the same table with the Big Boys of global politics and economics.

    National self-respect IS possible.

    After all, there do exist small countries, (Israel, for example). that refuse to extradite their citizens using the same high standards of National Sovereignty that America uses, NO.

    The question is by what political process, and on whose political authority, is Britain made to join the ranks of Banana Republics whose citizens aren’t worth the cost of protecting.

    • Rohe

      [i]National self-respect IS possible[/i]

      The US-Media-Hate-Machine would argue, that you wouldn’t need to blatantly copy US products to do so. Aren’t there local movie products you can copy instead to keep your “medial” freedom? I read that often in cases surrounding shut down domains etc. The US feels responsible, because its 99% US material from their companies thats shared. Even if this sounds somehow false, I understand where they are coming from: you like your own country rights but don’t care about others in other countries.

      • Anyone

        I’ve never been to TvShack, but I’m sure there were also links to BBC programming

      • ThumbsUpThumbsDown

        The very concept that American economic salvation in the coming century is to be discovered via the export of Intellectual Property that can be encased within the confines of existing Copyright and Patent Law is built on quicksand.

        It is true that America has enjoyed a century of competitive advantage in Techniques vastly empowered by its historical investments in academic and research infrastructure; but, that superiority did NOT arise via the contributive benevolence of the American Patent System or the American Copyright System.

        Absolutely the contrary: American competitive advantage has come despite the American patent system and despite the American Copyright system; and, it has been squandered in the protection of privileged monopolies.

        For the last eight decades, the American economy has been gutted by its devoted entrenchment of privileged monopolies in every sector of the national economy. The American Patent and Copyright systems are in every sense the legal expression of this myopia. The dream that America can compensate for its vast competitive global disadvantage in Labor cost by exporting superiority in Techniques in perpetuity is born of despair, but dies of futility.

        Why? First: Because the countries that were re-born out of the ashes of WWII are determined to compete with America on their own advantaged footing. They will not be foreclosed from necessary ideas merely because American power and suasion proclaims them to be “American” Ideas. Second: Because there is nothing more inherently fungible and fugacious than Ideas.
        Whatever ideal copyright system might become possible in an ideal future, our experience proves nothing more clearly than that our existing Copyright and Patent regimes are anything but efficient or equitable.

        Two conclusions: One: America must renounce its dependence on monopolies. They’re politically powerful, but economically inefficient.

        Two: America must get back to building things and infrastructure. It will do this best when it can convince itself that it CAN thrive in a universe of free flowing ideas.

  • Ardvaark

    Bittersweet victory.

    Basically they’re admitting defeat and saying he’s wrong at the same time by forcing him to pay for something that isn’t a crime in the UK, in order for them to admit that they were wrong and that his acts only involve UK jurisdiction after all.

    still a victory though as long as the value isn’t pulled out of the MAFIAA’s ass..

  • ndmushroom

    I don’t see why this is a victory. I mean, sure, on a personal level the fact that O’Dwyer won’t have to face charges in the US is a good thing, but compensating the copyright holders in exchange is in fact setting a precedent where every site administrator can be held liable under US law no matter where he lives. As far as the “copyright cause” is concerned, it would be much better to have O’Dwyer tried (and found guilty, if necessary) on UK soil for breaking UK laws than to accept that US law applies to all netizens in the world. If we’re asked to obey US legislation no matter where we live, why shouldn’t we be able to vote in the US elections to shape said legislation?

    • Guest

      I think we need a Britain ‘Hollywood’ party. Lets revolt against our US oppressors like they did to us in Boston over tea taxes.

      • Violated0

        What is this? Raid the Southampton port and toss all the DVD and BluRays cargo containers into the water? :-)

  • ITS-A-TRAP!!!

    It could be a trap!

    Fugitive Angel Resendiz made a deal with US authorities while living in Mexico, and voluntarily came to the United States on the promise that he would be sent to a psychiatric hospital rather than prison.

    But once on US soil, that promise was immediately broken and Angel Resendiz was sentenced to death and executed, despite pleas from the Mexican government that this was a dirty trick.

    Richard O’Dwyer may be in for the same kind of treatment. Once he sets foot in the US, he will at the mercy of a “justice” system with a long history of breaking promises.

    • Violated0
    • Guest321

      Its entirely possible. And I bet the UK government won’t step in to save his arse if something like that does happen since they didn’t hesitate to sell him out in the first place.

      Why does he have to travel to US to sign the deal? He is the victim here. The US govt should send its representatives to UK to take the signature from him at his place of convenience.

      • Anyone

        or at the embassy (technically that is US soil, so they could arrest him there as well)

      • ScrewEwe2

        I agree. It’s a huge hardship to expect he or his mother, or both, to buy a roundtrip ticket(s), pay for lodging, travel, food, etc., to sign some bogus dox. I would imagine that part of the US government’s reasons for caving on the extradition is the precedent it could set for such a trivial case, and I believe there are people that are in, or were in government that the US doesn’t want extradited to wherever. Isn’t Dubya wanted on war crimes in the World Court, or some other countries, so he can’t go on vacation to Pakistan or lovely Iran as a private citizen? I’m pretty sure the US government doesn’t recognize the World Court’s jurisdiction to prosecute US citizens. Personally, I think the World Court is 1 step too close to an eventual New World Order.

        • Again

          The US does not recognize any other courts but its own, including the International Court of Justice.

          After the US famously lost in that court against Nicaragua, Washington’s response went something like “fµck you – we’re not paying and you can’t make us!”

          Google Nicaragua v. United_States

          In reality, there is only one “legal system” that ever counts: the law of the gun

  • Bollocks to them all

    IF someone tells me where I can download a file (copyright protected file that is) and then I go and download it I have broken the law, not the person who told me where I could find the file. If the person who told me where I could download the file happened to be giving out fliers to a burger restaurant (and being paid to do so, ie advertising) then he has not profited by telling me where the file is available.

  • http://twitter.com/jokenball jokenball

    He should not have paid them fuck all.

  • Asashii

    and how many people will he roll-over for his freedom, hmmm i smell a rat!

  • Guest

    “”The MPAA, who are believed to be the prime instigators of the case, were not happy with these campaigns and will probably be disappointed by the deal.”"

    Why should the MPAA not be happy, although they will loose out on the millions that they claim to have lost by signing a deal and receiving some form of compensation (which by the way we all know that not one penny of the money will not be given to the artists or movie studios). In there eyes by signing this deal is still in a way showing that linking is still a criminal offence even though the O’Dwyer case was dropped by the CPS because it was not a criminal offence. It was only after a private prosecution by the MPAA and a request for extradition that his extradition was warranted.

    In any case whatever the deal is signed O’Dwyer will not have been convicted of a criminal offence and therefore he will not have a criminal record in the UK.

    • Anyone

      but think of all the millions the MPAA wasted bribing politicians
      now they can’t extort that out of an innocent student

    • MadAsASnake

      Why the MPAA should have a view of any value on this is beyond me. The US DOJ needs to get the MAFIAA claws out of its ass.

  • Hghjf

    15 grand a month aint sharing….thats business

    • Ardvaark

      First of all he isn’t making that much and even if he did, servers, domains and bandwidth aren’t free nor cheap so there goes a big chunk of his money.

      As for the very small part left, there isn’t anything wrong with that since he’s providing a simple and legal indexing service and getting revenue out of ads from page views. He’s not even selling or hosting anything that isn’t his.

      Also I’m pretty sure you’re still allowed to profit as much as you want from the things you yourself create. (although the MAFIAA doesn’t quite like that seeing as they take such large chunks from the same artists they’re supposed to help)

    • ThumbsUpThumbsDown

      Don’t be jealous. It’s a more equitable and more efficient distribution model; based on wide open access, rather than choke-point monopoly.

  • The_Strawbear

    Arresting him was like suing the TV guide because it lists a show which then makes defamatory comments about someone.

    Anyway, good to hear he’s staying home.

  • Anonymous

    this is obviously good news! however, the down sides are that he has still had to plead guilty and has to pay compensation just for linking to other sites, which previously under UK law was not illegal and giving people what the industries themselves refuse to do, fucking obnoxious morons! strange how UK law has been changed substantially, just to please a US industry that refuses to help itself by giving customers what they ask for. i wonder what the chances are of me getting the law changed for something that i want, like having dishonest politicians thrown into prison!

  • Searinox

    Democracy works! With the advent of the internet, angry activists, from inside a country and from all over the world, can now make an impact! We took down SOPA, PIPA, ACTA, and now this! Keep staying in touch! Keep supporting! Keep spreading the word! Stay vigilant! Keep your eyes on the TPP and similar threats! Let’s create a democracy 2.0 and a climate where WE are in charge!

    • Guest

      Definitely keep the heat on the TPP. It still has a healthy pulse, and Obama is said to be “deadly serious”, to quote NZ Prime Minister John Key, about getting the TPP pushed through.

      I think some SOPA-style internet blackouts and ACTA-style street protests are in order.

  • Edward Blackbeard Thatch

    isn’t it about time we here in england found something that is illegal here and not in america and demand whoever for whatever reason for extradition? if international boundries and independent countries mean jack shit to the yanks, fuck the cunts and play them at thier own game.

    being a war criminal is illegal here, lets have bush sent over for sentancing for his war crimes for starters.

    • MadAsASnake

      Why not extradite Dodd and prosecute him for bribery. That is definitely a criminal offense both here and the US, he has plainly done it, and the US isn’t prosecuting… bring his twisted ass here and slam him in a UK jail.

      • Anyone

        and after he served his sentence extradite him to another country to start all over again

  • http://pirateshit.com/ Morpheus

    Lucky! but i really think that britishers need to stop being a bitch for americans.

    MPAA and RIAA are just 2 big bugs just just want to make money on the blood of others.

    • inValid

      Britain has it’s own media interests, too, itself having quite a big industry. That they’re prepared to send off their own people merely indicates that they’re in agreement with the principle of punishment for the act of linking, though likely deluded by the idea that the U.S. would itself reciprocate by extraditing their own citizens.

  • http://torrentfreak.com/ Rob8urcakes

    I’m extremely suspicious with this so-called deal that involves the O’Dwyer’s to travel to and appear in person in the USA for such a trivial allegation of CopyWrong infringement.

    Quite simply I don’t trust the USA.
    I don’t trust the USA’s judicial system.
    And I don’t trust that the US will honourably agree to whatever the terms of agreement are.

    I’d also like to know what this “small sum” is that he’s to pay to the MAFIAA.

    In fact when I first heard this news this morning at 11am on the BBC Radio 4, I texted Julia O’Dwyer and offered no congratulations. What I did ask was whether or not she and Richard were happy with the deal or was just a rip-off.

    Her response was that she’d only just heard the news herself.

    So we REALLY need more details about this before we can start having a party and celebrating true justice.

    I hope the USA isn’t going to betray Richard in any way whatsoever if there’s an agreement that requires his signature. And why can’t that be done by post anyway ffs?

    Sorry, but I just don’t trust these USA bastards to hold to their part of whatever the deal is :(

    • Guest

      I am in agreement here, I do not trust the US at all especially that McKinnon’s extradition was rejected. And why now are the US offering this deal when the extradition hearing is due to be heard at the High Court shortly??? Maybe the US feels that the extradition will be rejected and in order to avoid the extradition being rejected and to get some justice that they are offering this deal. We all know that O’Dwyers case was rejected by the CPS because they say that there is no evidence to convict and yet the US pursued his extradition because they say what he did was a crime in there country.

      It does seem rather fishy to me and I have this feeling that when he goes to the US that somehow the deal will be completely forgotten about or some other charge will be dreamed up and laid on him when he gets there and he will end up in prison awaiting trial.

      Why can’t the US send the documentation to the US embassy here for him to sign here in the UK it surely can’t be that difficult for them to do so.

    • MadAsASnake

      I think the O’Dwyers should pursue an explanation and apology from Teresa May and the Home Office. What he did was not illegal here or in the US, so why was extradition even considered?

      • Guest

        Why are the US offering this deal now when the High Court will be shortly be hearing the extradition appeal? I doubt Teresa May or the Home Office will give an explanation or an apology as they will no doubt say that this deal is for the matter of the US and the O’Dwyers to deal with.

    • GO RICHARD!

      You’re not dealing with Iran or a Dictator (even though it might appear so), but you can’t just keep his mother as “hostage”. What are they going to charge her with? Accomplice to the crime?

    • Violated0

      Part of this DPA is that they are not allowed to mention the terms of the agreement nor mention the exact value involved. So there will be no details forthcoming or the DPA would be voided.

    • Jimmy

      100% this is a crock of s**t – you can’t try to extradite somebody and then drop it whenever you feel like – it’s makes a mockery of the extradition laws, and would just imply that the mafia have sickening control over governments. Something is up here and it totally stinks.

  • Guest

    My Ackbar Sense is tingling…

  • Xi_ruler

    This isn’t a victory for O’Dwyer, its a surrender. Did he have to sign away his first-born child as part of the payment?

    If it isn’t against the law in your own country, then no one should have to fear extradition to another country.

  • GO RICHARD!

    CONGRATS TO RICHARD AND HIS MUM.

    Without such a loving & caring mum he would not have survived this ordeal of the ‘unknown’. Facing 5 years in an American penetentiary with hardened criminals (& rapists) for such a petty “crime” (not even a crime in the UK) doesn’t add up.

    It is only a matter of time before the MPAA finds ANOTHER scapegoat they can smash up and put on an extradition case. The MPAA has no idea what Richard and his mother has gone through…Horrible, horrible, horrible and to think the Home Secretary would sign off one of its citizens for some complete made-up nonsense law, I only got one thing to say: Fuck you and I hope your political career falls short you dumb naive c*nt.

    Good day and Godbless.

  • Z z

    DOJ & ICE should have to pay damages and costs both to England and to Richard O’Dwyer.

    By the laws of England, Richard O’Dwyer was legal. If the US does not respect the laws of other countries, why should other countries respect US laws!

    • Guest

      They will not pay damages and costs because if this deal is signed then to the US there is nothing for them to pay but only for O’Dwyer to pay compensation. Anything that the US does will only be in there own self interest whereby they are not going to be the ones to pay out any money.

  • UK Home Secretary Cow
  • The Doctor

    I only have six words to say about Theresa May:

    Don’t you think she looks tired?

    • Anyone

      great reference

  • 1hhh1

    The UK papers report that he will now travel to the US to complete the deal, pay a small sum in compensation and give undertakings not to infringe copyright laws again.

    If true he’s a fool.

    • chronoss

      just like obama saying we want hackers to work for us then two russians went and they busted them when they arrived.

      you watch hes so stupid sign the deal in england you nitwit and in fact tell htem to fuck themsleves….and take it like a man and cost there system money….stop ahving mom drain her pocket books and 30 years prison is = to nearly 3 million cost to them so they need ot sue a TON more kids to recoup that cost…

    • TRAPTRAP

      If it’s him, then he’s it’s a trap. If it’s his mum then cool. Other question is – who’s paying for the flight and hotel?

  • Tmc80tmc

    Sounds like extortion to me…
    This will probably set a precedent in the future for more international application US laws abroad.

    • chronoss

      no more law for the uk just have your masters in teh usa do it for you

  • IonOtter

    They wanted to put him in prison for life and fine him squintillions of dollars, and all of a sudden, they make a deal that says, “Come over here and pay $20 and sign this paper?”

    Bill Cosby: “….right(!)”

    Yeah, no, I don’t think so. Tell you what, you send that paperwork over here, and I’ll go straight to the local magistrate and sign it right here in Merry Old England.

  • Andrew Lee

    I don’t get this at all why in the hell did they do a 180.. Unless they think the UK was going to cave into public pressure to drop this bullshit case anyways. It seems like a trap because there is no reason he could not do the payment via one of the many online payment hubs that exist. My government is full of scam artist politicians don’t trust them because they’ll fuck you the first chance they get.

    If we take him soon as he gets here what would the UK really do about it? They’re influenced by the RIAA & MPAA just as much as we are. My government and their government both have no problem bending over backwards to provide favors “open wide I mean hardly open” to their masters.

  • chronoss

    so he puts more cash into the system to keep it harming more people
    nice job dumbass
    better to cost them money and think that way then to sell out and bend over lile a lil girlie boy

  • CrazyBrit

    Ok, so call me slow, but what happened to innocent until proven guilty. If he’s not been found guilty of any crimes… after all there’s been no trial… so how come he has to come over to the US to pay a “small” fine!

    While I’m really glad that the extradition won’t happen, the whole things’s been a pile of bollocks from the start.This just adds to it! IMHO that is :)

    • Violated0

      Yes it is a case that should never have happened.

      Even worse this leaves many UK administrators of file sharing websites not knowing what the law is and how this affects them. TVShack from all we know was a lawful website confirmed by the CPS refusing to take action but here we are with Theresa May happy to ship such administrators to face US law. So this is a sovereignty crisis when no UK citizen while living in the UK and obeying established UK law should need to follow US law or be forced to do so.

      As to your point then this DPA is a private contract agreement where they are saying “you be good in the future and we will drop charges”. If Richard was unhappy with the terms he could have refused meaning the fee paid is not some court imposed punishment or admission of guilt.

  • Gen. Eric Guy

    Despiet no longer being extradited, I think the TSA will decide to fuck with him anyway, “just because we can”.

    God help you O’Dwyers, if you have some hostile TSA agents messing with you, and finding a reason to imprison you anyway as “terrorists”.

  • hiomio
  • D.

    When is the entertainment industry finally going to give up on that cash cow and move on to something else? Nobody wants them around. Nobody benefits but these blood-sucking middlemen. The artists don’t benefit, the writers don’t benefit, and the consumer doesn’t benefit. Society doesn’t benefit either; instead of a free and creative art, music, film, and writing scene, we have some sort of bureaucratic monstrosity, out of which nothing good comes for anyone.

    It is like a nation that had no natural water, so a company manufactured it, slapped a copyright on it, and sold it to people. Then all of a sudden it rained from the skies and nobody needed to buy it anymore, and so the water industry desperately tried to force people to continue to buy it and made it illegal to take the free water available to them. This is just like the entertainment industry. Just die already. Just give up and die. You bled the people dry for long enough, just let us have our entertainment and support the actual creators ourselves and stop meddling with it and trying to make money where there is none to be made. Just piss off and let us drink our free water.

    *note: the fact that we buy bottled water is an unrelated absurdity and has no place in this analogy.

  • D.

    I love how China know show to stand up to the States. Sure, they cooperate and help bust a big pirate from time to time in order to pretend to care and appease the US, but ultimately they are laughing it up over there. Say what you will about China (and yes there many bad things about the country) but at least they have the kahunas to basically say “we don’t respect or give a crap about copyright or any other form of right holding, and we are going to copy whatever the hell we want”. Man, you gotta respect that.

    It is good to see a prosperous country that operates just fine and has absolutely no need for archaic copyright laws. They are setting the example of a country that not only rejects copyright, but never valued it in the first place. The mistake we made in the west was marrying ourselves to the silly idea that you can own ideas or information. Now we are like a baby having our candy torn away, when really we shouldn’t have had that candy in the first place. Man I can’t wait until we finally bury this ridiculous notion and get on with our lives, unfettered by the claws of blood-sucking industries manipulating our law system. A system that was meant to protect its citizens and see to our prosperity, not serve industries that only seek to fuck us in the ass.

  • BobMail

    Another wonderfully misleading story from TorrentFreak.

    He won’t be extradited only because he is going to the US of his own accord, without waiting for the British courts to rule or for the extradition process to go forward.

    It doesn’t make him any less guilty, it just makes him a little more of a man for being willing to face up to justice for his crimes.

    Make no mistake: Anyone making a living off of pirating copyright material will be prosecuted. In the long run, these guys harm your cause by making it about money, and not about freedom or anything like that.

    • Fredrika

      > “It doesn’t make him any less guilty, it just makes him a little more of a man for being willing to face up to justice for his crimes.”

      You seem confused. He didn’t commit any crimes? He is 100% innocent. What he did was fully legal within the relevant jurisdiction.

      > “Anyone making a living off of pirating copyright material will be prosecuted.”

      Which he wasn’t.

      > “In the long run, these guys harm your cause by making it about money, and not about freedom or anything like that.”

      Why do you blame the victim?

  • Foff

    It is quite clear why this deal was struck. The election is over, this case has a jurisdiction problem. No court in the US really has proper jurisdiction so the case would fail on that alone. The cost vs benefit. Why extradite spend a million or more on a long trial a get a short sentence. One year less and a small fine. The doj would like total stupid asses to waste any more manpower on this case when there are many many much more important crimes they ought to be spending their budget and effort on.

  • Pingback: Richard O’Dwyer no será extraditado a Estados Unidos

  • Pingback: Richard O’Dwyer no será extraditado a Estados Unidos - Marketing digital : Marketing digital

  • Pingback: Richard O’Dwyer no será extraditado a Estados Unidos | El Tenanpa

  • Pingback: Richard O’Dwyer will not be extradited to the U.S. | Tech Crash

  • Pingback: Richard O’Dwyer no será extraditado a Estados Unidos | TodoMdP

  • Dumb Ass

    Richard O’dwyer is a dumb ass for doing this.

  • Pingback: Richard O’Dwyer no será extraditado a Estados Unidos | SONSEMAR NOTICIAS

  • hiogio
  • piofiu
  • wandaole
  • Pingback: TV Shack Admin Richard O’Dwyer Will NOT Be Extradited To U.S. | Zombie Torrents - Ultimate Torrents Downloads

  • Pingback: Quickthink » Blog Archive » Mr. O’Dwyer, Six Strikes and Trends

  • BTGuard - BitTorrent Anonymously

NewsBits

Even more news...

  • The Pirate Bay Isn’t Down Completely, Just Having a Few Issues

    Twitter and Facebook, not to mention the TorrentFreak inbox, are currently alive with complaints that The...

  • Pirate Bay Founder Gottfrid Svartholm on Freedom of Speech

    Freedom of speech is a highly valued commodity, but should people be allowed to say whatever...

  • Blu-ray Anti-Piracy Tech Stops Discs and Promotes Purchases

    An anti-piracy system present in all official Blu-ray players since 2012 has received a fresh update...

  • Foxtel Breeds Pirates by Locking Up Game of Thrones

    One of the main reasons why people turn to piracy is the lack of legal alternatives....

  • UK Student Admits Breaching Sony Copyrights With Leak of PS3 SDK

    Last year an Internet user known as El Nomeo leaked version 3.70 of Sony’s Playstation3 SDK...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

PopularArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.