The Copyright Alliance a few days ago, a public interest group that has strong connections with rightsholders, sent a submission to the U.S. Department of Commerce’s National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), calling for action.
Copyright Alliance Response to NTIA Inquiry
The request is a response to an NTIA inquiry into the current state of the mobile app ecosystem. In particular, the request for comment aims to identify challenges or barriers that restrict app distribution or user adoption.
Piracy is not mentioned in the brief but the Copyright Alliance believes that this issue should be taken into account as well.
“In order to promote lawful competition in the mobile app ecosystem, the Copyright Alliance asks that NTIA consider the harm infringing activity in the mobile app ecosystem causes to legitimate mobile app developers, third party rights holders who license their works for use in legitimate mobile apps, and mobile app users who may be duped into using infringing apps.”
The Alliance points out that app piracy is a growing problem that leads to billions of dollars in lost revenue. Among other things, the submission cites 2018 data from Google, which reported that takedown notices removed more than 14,000 items from the Play Store in that year.
Screening Apps and Devs
While piracy is hard to eradicate entirely, the Copyright Alliance believes that a lot of progress can be made by carefully screening developers and apps before they enter the store.
“One of the most important actions that can be taken to mitigate against such harm is to have the mobile app storefronts engage in reasonable, enhanced screening of the app developers and the mobile apps before they are offers [sic] on the mobile app storefront, and other best practices to deter infringing apps,” the Copyright Alliance writes.
The letter encourages the NTIA to promote a set of best practices for the app ecosystem. This should include “enhanced vetting” of developers, “screening” apps for infringements, and an effective notice and takedown system.
“Such screening and app removal helps competition by removing fraudulent and infringing apps that take away customers from legitimate app developers,” the letter reads.
Apple is a platform that already has tight restrictions and vetting practices in place so the recommendations appear to be mostly directed at Google. That said, when it comes to challenges and barriers, Apple has plenty to say as well.
Apple Weighs In
The iOS platform is already closed to “unvetted” apps and unlike Android, there is no standard option to sideload software on iOS devices. Some people see this as a competitive barrier that aims to maximize control and profitability, but Apple frames it differently.
In its response to the NTIA inquiry, Apple stresses that app screening is crucial to ensure the security of the App Store and iOS. In addition, the ban on sideloading helps to prevent piracy as well.
“[Sideloading] permits threats such as adware, ransomware, or malware, or scammers who exploit apps to mislead users, attack mobile devices’ security features, violate user privacy, and expose developers to piracy and other harms,” Apple writes.
“The increased threat from sideloading would also erode users’ and developers’ trust in the ecosystem, resulting in many users downloading fewer apps from fewer developers, and making fewer in-app purchases.”
Apple stresses that this sideloading threat is recognized by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, the European Agency for Cybersecurity, Europol, and other experts. However, not everyone agrees that sideloading is a problem.
Cydia Counters Apple
The submission from Jay Freeman, who’s also known as ‘saurik’, paints an entirely different picture. According to the creator of the popular sideloading app Cydia, Apple’s closed ecosystem is a barrier that limits competition and harms the public at large.
Freeman notes that the current mobile platforms are doing all they can to lock people in. The cost of switching to a different platform is “ridiculously high” and requires people to carefully rebuild their digital life, which can be a lot of work.
“This circumstance grants the platform which manages to get a user an almost unprecedented level of control over the content they are allowed to access and how their money is spent and directed through their ecosystem,” Freeman writes.
Cydia’s creator also doesn’t believe that sideloading is more dangerous, pointing out that the iOS store has its own scam and fraud issues too. Similarly, jailbreaking doesn’t lead to more piracy either, he argues.
“The US Copyright Office itself–which I’d dare say is one of the most foremost experts on this specific topic–concluded that ‘the record did not demonstrate any significant relationship between jailbreaking and piracy’,” Freeman writes.
The responses from the Copyright Alliance, Apple, and Freeman, show that “challenges” and “barriers” can be looked at from various angles. If and how the NTIA will take the piracy angle into consideration for its final recommendation remains to be seen.